Search

Itepekimab, a monoclonal antibody against interleukin‐33, has demonstrated clinical utility in previous studies in patients with asthma and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An autoinjector (AI) has been developed for administering itepekimab to facilitate further development. This study compared pharmacokinetics of single 300‐mg itepekimab subcutaneous administration via an AI versus a prefilled syringe (PFS). Of 90 healthy volunteers enrolled in this Phase 1, parallel‐design, randomized study and stratified by body weight (50 to <70 kg, ≥70 to <80 kg, ≥80 to 100 kg) and injection site (abdomen, thigh, or arm), 84 completed the study. Systemic exposure of itepekimab was similar for both groups. Point estimates for geometric mean ratios of pharmacokinetic parameters for AI versus PFS groups were 1.01 for maximum serum concentration, 1.06 for area under the serum concentration‐time curve to the last quantifiable concentration, and 1.04 for area under the serum concentration‐time curve extrapolated to infinity. The exposure was similar for both devices in each body weight and injection site subgroup. Overall, systemic exposure of 300‐mg single‐dose itepekimab in healthy participants was comparable when administered subcutaneously via an AI device and PFS, with an acceptable safety profile in both device groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

In order to improve the feeding efficiency of the push-rod device of the pre-filled syringe, the simulation analysis was carried out based on the JKR model of EDEM software. With the push-rod as the research object and the discharge number in specified time period as the evaluation index, the influences of the inner tray rotation speed, the outer tray rotation speed, the tilt angle of the inner rotation tray, the angle of the cone tray and the outer rotation radius on the discharge efficiency of the push-rod were investigated. Firstly, single factor analysis was carried out to determine the influence of each single factor and screen out the four factors that with greater influence. Then the orthogonal design of four factors and three levels was carried out to determine the optimal parameter combination and the order of the influence degree of each factor on the discharge efficiency. The discharge stability was studied and the best feeding method was obtained. Finally, the experimental validation was carried out. The results show that the maximum error of simulation and test is 9.6%, which indicates that the simulation analysis of the model is reliable. Under the condition of the best parameter combination, the discharge efficiency is improved by 29.8% compared with the original data. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] • This review provides a systematic summary of FDA-approved biologic-device combination products regarding their device configurations, routes of administration, formulations, instructions for use, etc. • While prefilled syringes, autoinjectors and pen injectors remain as the mainstay of medical devices, innovative modifications like dual-chamber design and novel devices like on-body injector also emerged as promising presentations. • Insulin related combination products are all delivered by pen injectors with multi-dose cartridges subcutaneously. Vaccine-device combination products are presented with PFS and administered through the intramuscular route. • Around 40 % of products employ high-concentration formulations (≥ 100 mg/mL), and 78 % of mAb products are at high concentrations. With the remarkably strong growth of the biopharmaceutical market, an increasing demand for self-administration and rising competitions attract substantial interest to the biologic-device combination products. The ease-of-use of biologic-device combination products can minimize dosing error, improve patient compliance and add value to the life-cycle management of biological products. As listed in the purple book issued by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA), a total of 98 brand biologic-device combination products have been approved with Biologic License Application from January 2000 to August 2023, where this review mainly focused on 63 products containing neither insulin nor vaccine. Prefilled syringes (PFS) and autoinjectors are the most widely adopted devices, whereas innovative modifications like needle safety guard and dual-chamber design and novel devices like on-body injector also emerged as promising presentations. All 16 insulin products employ pen injectors, while all 19 vaccine products are delivered by a PFS. This review provides a systematic summary of FDA-approved biologic-device combination products regarding their device configurations, routes of administration, formulations, instructions for use, etc. In addition, challenges and opportunities associated with biologic-device compatibility, regulatory complexity, and smart connected devices are also discussed. It is believed that evolving technologies will definitely move the boundaries of biologic-device combination product development even further. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Summary: Peri‐operative medication safety is complex. Avoidance of medication errors is both system‐ and practitioner‐based, and many departments within the hospital contribute to safe and effective systems. For the individual anaesthetist, drawing up, labelling and then the correct administration of medications are key components in a patient's peri‐operative journey. These guidelines aim to provide pragmatic safety steps for the practitioner and other individuals within the operative environment, as well as short‐ to long‐term goals for development of a collaborative approach to reducing errors. The aim is that they will be used as a basis for instilling good practice. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ligelizumab is a highly potent, humanized IgG1, anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. To explore its optimal subcutaneous delivery, the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and tolerability of ligelizumab from two Phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers (HVs) and four Phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) were assessed. Using different injection volumes or durations of a liquid-in-vial (LIVI) formulation or different formulations (LIVI vs. prefilled syringe (PFS)), single-dose ligelizumab showed comparable PK exposure in HVs. Steady-state exposure of ligelizumab was also comparable between LIVI and PFS following multiple dosing in CSU patients. The total IgE level (a PD marker) and tolerability were similar between the two formulations in both HVs and patients. Furthermore, the PK, total IgE, and tolerability were comparable for PFS administered either by patients or healthcare providers (HCPs). Collective evidence demonstrated that the injection duration or volume, formulation, or administrator had no apparent impact on the PK, PD, and tolerability of ligelizumab, supporting no clinically relevant difference between LIVI and PFS, and that PFS can be administered by patients or HCPs. This report provides a comprehensive assessment based on data of multiple clinical endpoints from both HVs and patients to inform formulation development and commercial use of a monoclonal antibody. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

PurposeTo compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS).MethodsDatasets of the intravitreal injection service of the Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich and the Technical University Munich, Germany, were screened for documentation of TVL after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. The observation period included two full months prior to the introduction of the novel PFS and two months afterwards. TVL was defined as loss of perception of hand motion for a duration of >30 s.ResultsOver a period of four months, 1720 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were administered in 672 patients. There were 842 injections with the old VS, and 878 injections using the novel PFS. Using the VS, TVL was noted during two injections (0.24%) in two patients, as compared to 11 cases of TVL (1.25%) in 10 patients with the PFS (p = 0.015). Using the PFS, patients had a 5.3-fold risk of TVL as compared to the VS (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.2–24.1; p = 0.0298).ConclusionThere was a more than five-fold risk of TVL using the novel pre-filled aflibercept syringe as compared to the established vial system. During informed consent, this risk should be discussed.

Prefilled syringes are widely used as a primary container for therapeutic proteins because they are more convenient than glass vials. The stability of biologic molecules can be affected by different syringe materials and techniques, such as silicone oil levels and coating method, amount of tungsten remaining in the glass barrel after using a tungsten pin to create the needle hole, and end of the syringe, which can be Luer locked or pre-staked with a needle. We investigated the impact of these parameters by using a monoclonal antibody to collect the antibody's stability profile and the prefilled syringes' functionality data. Silicone oil levels had no impact on aggregation levels, and particle counts were lowest for silicone oil–free syringes. Functionality performance was similar and did not change throughout all stability time points for all syringe configurations. The break-loose force for Ompi syringes was initially lower and increased over time to align with those of the other configurations, all of which remained well below 25 N. Tungsten contaminants and agitation stress from shipping studies did not impact quality attributes. This work can help guide the development of similar products in prefilled syringes to ensure selection of the primary container that provides adequate stability for the protein, as well as maintain the desired functionality features over the shelf life of the drug product. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A prototype reusable large-volume (2mL) autoinjector (LVAI) was designed to compare injection performance of a novel 27 gauge ultra-thin wall (UTW) pre-filled syringe (PFS) cannula (8mm external cannula length, 14.4mm total needle length) against an existing 27 gauge special thin wall (STW) PFS cannula (12.7mm external cannula length, 19mm total needle length) across a range of injectate viscosities (2.3-30 cP) in a series of in vivo feasibility studies in swine. The UTW cannula had an approximately 30% greater cross-sectional lumen area than the STW cannula. The target exposed needle length was adjusted to ensure appropriate needle penetration depth and achieve injectate deposition in the subcutaneous (SC) tissue. Delivery time and volume, injection site leakage, injectate depot location, and local tissue effects were examined. The STW and UTW cannulae both provided effective SC delivery of contrast placebo solutions, and were able to accommodate injectate viscosity up to 30 cP without quantifiable leakage from the tissue and with minor tissue effects which resolved within 1-2 hours. Delivery times at each viscosity were significantly different between PFS types with the UTW PFS producing faster delivery times. In a histological substudy of the UTW cannula using injectate viscosities up to 50 cP, injection site reactions were rare and, when present, were of minimal severity. This series of studies demonstrates the feasibility of LVAI SC injection and informs autoinjector and PFS design considerations. Use of a UTW cannula may enable more rapid LVAI injections with minimal tissue effects, especially for higher viscosity formulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ligelizumab is a highly potent, humanized IgG1, anti-IgE monoclonal antibody. To explore its optimal subcutaneous delivery, the pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamics (PD), and tolerability of ligelizumab from two Phase 1 studies in healthy volunteers (HVs) and four Phase 2 and 3 studies in patients with chronic spontaneous urticaria (CSU) were assessed. Using different injection volumes or durations of a liquid-in-vial (LIVI) formulation or different formulations (LIVI vs. prefilled syringe (PFS)), single-dose ligelizumab showed comparable PK exposure in HVs. Steady-state exposure of ligelizumab was also comparable between LIVI and PFS following multiple dosing in CSU patients. The total IgE level (a PD marker) and tolerability were similar between the two formulations in both HVs and patients. Furthermore, the PK, total IgE, and tolerability were comparable for PFS administered either by patients or healthcare providers (HCPs). Collective evidence demonstrated that the injection duration or volume, formulation, or administrator had no apparent impact on the PK, PD, and tolerability of ligelizumab, supporting no clinically relevant difference between LIVI and PFS, and that PFS can be administered by patients or HCPs. This report provides a comprehensive assessment based on data of multiple clinical endpoints from both HVs and patients to inform formulation development and commercial use of a monoclonal antibody.

This study aimed to compare the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of the prefilled syringe (PFS) with lyophilized (LYO) recombinant human tumor necrosis factor‐α receptor II:lgG Fc fusion protein (rhTNFR:Fc) in healthy Chinese male subjects. A single‐center, randomized, open‐label, 2‐period, crossover study was performed in healthy Chinese male subjects. Subjects were randomly assigned into 2 sequences and received a subcutaneous injection of 25 mg rhTNFR:Fc PFS or rhTNFR:Fc LYO (Anbainuo), with a 35‐day washout between the 2 periods. Blood samples were collected at specified time intervals, and then serum concentrations of rhTNFR:Fc were analyzed by enzyme‐linked immunosorbent assay. The maximum serum concentration, area under the concentration‐time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were all calculated and evaluated. Meanwhile, safety and immunogenicity were also assessed. A total of 82 subjects completed the study, and six subjects withdrew for various reasons. The 90%CIs for geometric mean ratios of maximum serum concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last quantifiable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were all within the equivalence range of 80% to 125%. Safety was comparable between the 2 formulations with low immunogenicity. rhTNFR:Fc PFS exhibited similar pharmacokinetic and safety profiles of rhTNFR:Fc LYO (Anbainuo) in healthy Chinese male subjects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The purpose of this study was to develop a cost-effectiveness model for manufacturer-prepared prefilled ready-to-administer (RTA) syringe products versus the traditional vial-and-syringe administration of intravenous (IV) opioids. Methods: Cost parameters included cost of manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product, traditional vial and syringe, drug preparation, drug administration, drug waste, and severity of error. Effectiveness endpoint included number of preparation and administration errors in each comparator arm. Simple decision tree was used, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated as the reduction in the incremental errors per observation with RTA compared with traditional vial-and-syringe method. One-way sensitivity analysis (OWSA) and probabilistic sensitivity analysis (PSA) were conducted to test the robustness of the model. TreeAge Pro software was used to create and analyze the decision model. All the cost parameters were converted to USD 2021. Results: Base-case analysis showed that the cost of the RTA arm was lower by $182.61 and the number of errors in the RTA arm was lower by 94%, compared with the traditional vial-and-syringe arm. The manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product was found to be cost-effective with an incremental savings of $22,554 per additional error avoided. Sensitivity analysis showed that ICER value was most sensitive to the probability of errors; however, the results were robust in showing that RTA is the preferred cost-effective option, when both the costs and effectiveness parameters were varied substantially. Conclusion: This economic evaluation analyzed costs of using manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product IV opioids and incremental benefits in terms of reduced errors, adverse events, and their associated costs. Manufacturer-prepared prefilled RTA syringe product was found to be cost-effective, demonstrating cost savings by reduction in the error rates. Integrating and adopting RTA syringe products within a health system could play an important role in improving care, building efficiency, increasing patient safety, and saving money. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A prefilled syringe (PFS) should be able to be adequately and consistently extruded during injection for optimal safe drug delivery and accurate dosing. To facilitate appropriate break-loose and gliding forces (BLGFs) required during injection, certain primary packaging materials (PPMs) such as the syringe barrel and plunger are usually coated with silicone oil, which acts as a lubricant. Due to its direct contact with drug, silicone oil can increase the number of particles in the syringe, which could lead to adverse interactions. Compliance with regulatory-defined silicone oil quantities in certain drug products, such as ophthalmics, presents a trade-off with the necessity for desirable low and consistent BLGF. In addition to its siliconization, the dimensional accuracy of the PPM has an important role in controlling the BLGF. The dimensions of the PPM are individualized depending on the product and its design and have certain tolerances that must be met during manufacturing. Most studies on ophthalmics focused on the adverse interactions between silicone oil and the drug. To the authors' knowledge, there have been no public studies so far that have investigated the impact of the dimensional variability of the PPM on the BLGF in ophthalmic PFSs. In this study, we applied advanced optical shaft and tactile measuring technologies to investigate this impact. The syringes investigated were first sampled during aseptic production and tested for the BLGF. Subsequently, defined dimensions of the PPM were measured individually. The results showed that the dimensional variability of the PPM can have a negative impact on the BLGF, despite their conformity to specifications, which indicates that the currently available market quality of PPMs is improvable for critical drug products such as ophthalmics. This study could serve as an approach to define product-specific requirements for primary packaging combinations and thus appropriate specifications based on data during the development stage of drug products., (© PDA, Inc. 2024.)

Risankizumab is approved for treatment of moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. Availability of a patient-controlled single self-injection of risankizumab may improve adherence and long-term management of psoriasis. To investigate efficacy, safety, and usability of a new risankizumab 150 mg/mL formulation administered as a single subcutaneous injection via prefilled syringe (PFS) or autoinjector (AI). Efficacy, safety, usability, and acceptability of risankizumab 150 mg/mL PFS or AI were investigated in adults with moderate to severe psoriasis in two phase 3 studies. Study 1 was a multicenter, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study that investigated 150 mg/mL risankizumab PFS; study 2 was a multicenter, single-arm, open-label study that investigated 150 mg/mL risankizumab AI. At week 16, risankizumab 150 mg/mL demonstrated efficacy vs. placebo (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index ≥90% improvement (PASI 90), 62.9% vs. 3.8%; static Physician Global Assessment (sPGA) 0/1, 78.1% vs. 9.6%; both p<.001) in study 1; in study 2, PASI 90 and sPGA 0/1 were 66.7%, and 81.5%, respectively. All patients successfully self-administered study treatments via PFS or AI. Acceptability of self-injection was high in both studies. Efficacy and safety of risankizumab 150 mg/mL were comparable with results from previous risankizumab phase 3 studies using the 90 mg/mL formulation. The efficacy, safety, and usability of 150 mg/mL risankizumab delivered as a single PFS or AI injection support use of this new formulation in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. NCT03875482 and NCT0387508 [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Purpose: This study aimed to compare the risk for post-injection endophthalmitis between different anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) agents and syringe preparation techniques. Methods: A retrospective study of anti-VEGF injections performed in 3 large ophthalmology departments between 2013 and 2019 was conducted. Injections were categorized according to the drug and the syringe-filling technique – prefilling by a hospital pharmacy, prefilling by a good manufacturing practice (GMP) pharmacy, self-drawing from the vial by the injecting physician, and use of a prefilled syringe. Cases of endophthalmitis were identified, and their rates were analyzed. Results: A total of 197,402 injections were included, and 53 cases of endophthalmitis were identified (0.027% risk). The risk of endophthalmitis following injections with syringes that were prefilled by GMP pharmacies or the manufacturers was significantly lower than that following injections which were self-drawn by the physician (0.019% vs. 0.055%, p < 0.0001). For ranibizumab, risk of endophthalmitis decreased since it became available in a prefilled syringe (0.054% vs. 0.014%, p = 0.066), bordering on statistical significance. Conclusions: The syringe-filling technique is an important factor determining risk of post-injection endophthalmitis. Use of GMP-grade prefilling by professional pharmacies or the manufacturers significantly reduces this risk and should be the technique of choice for all drugs administered by intravitreal injection. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Methotrexate is the most commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug recommended in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. It can be administered orally or subcutaneously, the latter method is associated with fewer side effects and higher drug bioavailability. Nevertheless, the pain associated with injection is a considerable drawback of this treatment option in the pediatric population. Currently, there are two single-use subcutaneous injection devices available: the prefilled syringe and the prefilled pen. This prospective, two-sequence crossover study aimed to compare ease of use, frequency of therapy side effects, injection-site pain and parent/patient preference of those methotrexate parenteral delivery systems. Methods Twenty-three patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, already treated with subcutaneous methotrexate in the form of prefilled syringe in the period October 2018 – April 2019 completed a questionnaire evaluating their experience with this device. Subsequently, children received a one-month supply of pen autoinjector and completed the same questionnaire, regarding their experience with the new methotrexate delivery system. If the patient was not performing the injections himself the questionnaires were completed by the caregiver administrating MTX. The results obtained in both questionnaires were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Results 82,6% patients and their caregivers voted for the prefilled pen as their preferred method of subcutaneous methotrexate administration. Moreover, the injection with the prefilled pen was reported as less painful in comparison to the prefilled syringe (p

Background: Several biologics for the treatment of severe asthma are available as self-administration devices., Objective: We performed a systematic literature review to understand the use, benefits, and challenges of these self-administration devices., Methods: Electronic databases and conference proceedings were searched using terms for asthma, biologic treatment, and at-home/self-administration (GSK study 213094). Publications were scanned for relevance using prespecified Population, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design (PICOS) criteria. Data on efficacy, safety, patient experience, and economic outcomes were extracted; study quality was assessed. A firsthand patient perspective was obtained., Results: Thirty-five of 504 records met the inclusion criteria. Across four phase 3 studies, ≥95% of biologic self-administrations were successful on the basis of predefined criteria. At-home self-administration was preferred over in-clinic administration by 43-96% of patients across 5 studies. Most patients (≥89%) in two phase 3 studies reported completing self-administration easily without repeated reference to instructions; high proportions of patients (≥98%) were confident in their ability to self-administer their biologic, and ≥96% rated it as extremely, very or moderately easy to self-administer. Across 16 studies reporting efficacy data, there was evidence of reduced blood eosinophil counts and improved asthma control with biologic self-administration, with improved health-related quality of life shown across 6 studies. Economic outcomes data were limited. From a patient perspective, autonomy is the major benefit of self-administration., Conclusion: Although more evidence is needed, this systematic literature review provides consistent evidence of high injection success rates and, supported by a patient perspective, preference for self-administration of biologics among patients with severe asthma., Competing Interests: Funded by GSK (study 213094). Disclosure of potential conflict of interest: S. Boccaletti at the time of the study was a GSK employee. R. Alfonso-Cristancho and W. Ahmed are employees of GSK and hold stocks and shares. A. Eze, L. Badgujar, N. Halfpenny, and D. Heldt are employees of OPEN Health which received payment from GSK to conduct this study. P. Auti and C. Alleman at the time of the study were employees of OPEN 10.13039/100018696Health who received funding from GSK to conduct this study. L. Sergison declares no relevant conflicts of interest., (© 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology.)

Purpose: To review the first Research and Safety in Therapeutics (ReST) Committee webinar and summarize the most current recommendations regarding diagnosis and management. Methods: The ReST Committee is comprised of members of the American Society of Retina Surgeons (ASRS). At regular internal meetings, safety issue reports from the website are reviewed. A webinar series was started in 2021 to update members on multiple relevant potential safety events. Results: Topics reviewed in the webinar included pentosan polysulfate sodium (Elmiron) maculopathy, intraocular pressure elevation reported with the aflibercept prefilled syringe (PFS), and brolucizumab-associated inflammation with occlusive retinal vasculitis. Retinal toxicity related to intraoperative medications was reviewed, including hemorrhagic occlusive retinal vasculitis after intraocular vancomycin, dilution errors with intravitreal aminoglycosides, inadvertent overdoses of cefuroxime after cataract surgery, and toxic posterior segment syndrome after dropless cataract surgery using compounded triamcinolone-moxifloxacin. Indocyanine green toxicity has been reported after its use as an adjuvant during macular hole surgery. Conclusions: The past decade has seen advances in retinal pharmaceuticals and drug-delivery devices. The ASRS ReST Committee collects data from its website reporting system to inform members about up-to-date pharmaceutical and device safety concerns. Recently, a webinar was used to inform members of pigmentary maculopathy associated with pentosan polysulfate sodium, safety regarding the aflibercept PFS, intraocular inflammation and occlusive retinal vasculitis secondary to brolucizumab, and retinal toxicity from intraoperative ocular medications., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of the article., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Background: We assessed pain, acceptability, patient preference, and tolerability of patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis after switching guselkumab from a prefilled syringe to One-Press autoinjector pen., Methods: Patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis treated for at least 6 months with guselkumab syringe were recruited from Jan 2019 to Dec 2022. Gender, age, diagnosis, self-administration, and pain perception of guselkumab prefilled syringe were recorded. At the first visit, patients completed a post-auto-injection syringe questionnaire before starting auto-injection pen administration. After 2 and 6 months of guselkumab self-injection using the One-Press autoinjector pen, patient experience, adherence, preference, pain, and safety of each administration were assessed using post-guselkumab by One-Press autoinjector pen questionnaire., Results: 40 patients [psoriasis n=34, psoriatic arthritis n=6] were included. All patients self-administered guselkumab by One-Press autoinjector pen. Pain at the injection site was significantly reduced with the use of the One-Press autoinjector pen. All patients considered that using One-Press autoinjector pen was easier than the syringe, 98% chose the pen as their preferred delivery system., Conclusion: The One-Press autoinjector pen for guselkumab administration is presented as a preferred option, with a high satisfaction and less painful compared to the administration of guselkumab in a prefilled syringe., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no affiliations with or financial interest in any company or organization that could conflict with the views expressed in this manuscript., (Copyright © 2024 Sociedad Española de Farmacia Hospitalaria (S.E.F.H). Publicado por Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Fremanezumab (AJOVY; Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd, Netanya, Israel), approved for the preventive treatment of migraine, is available as a subcutaneous injection either once a month or once every 3 months using an autoinjector or a prefilled syringe. The present study evaluated the pharmacokinetic (PK) bioequivalence of a single subcutaneous injection of fremanezumab 225 mg administered using an autoinjector compared to a prefilled syringe in healthy volunteers. Blood samples for PK and antidrug antibodies were collected before and after dosing. Safety and tolerability assessments included physical examinations, adverse event reporting, laboratory evaluations, and immunogenicity. Following single‐dose administration, the mean concentration‐time profiles for the 2 treatment groups (autoinjector, n = 106; and prefilled syringe, n = 110) were similar. The point estimates for the back‐transformed ratio (autoinjector/prefilled syringe) of geometric least squares means of maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 to the time of the last measurable drug concentration, and area under the plasma concentration–time curve from time 0 extrapolated to infinity were 1.03, 1.04, and 1.05, respectively, with the 90% confidence intervals entirely contained within bioequivalence margins of 0.8 to 1.25. For both groups, median time to maximum observed concentration was 5 days and mean terminal elimination half‐life was approximately 29 days. Treatment‐related adverse events were reported by 39 (36%) subjects in the autoinjector group and 26 (24%) in the prefilled syringe group, and the majority were nonserious injection site reactions. The incidence of treatment‐emergent antidrug antibody response was low and evenly distributed between the autoinjector (n = 3; 3%) and prefilled syringe (n = 4; 4%) groups. These results indicate that the fremanezumab autoinjector presentation provides an easy‐to‐use bioequivalent PK profile with a similar safety and tolerability profile to that of the prefilled syringe. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Gary T Ferguson,1 Jeremy Cole,2 Magnus Aurivillius,3 Paul Roussel,4 Peter Barker,4 Ubaldo J Martin4 On behalf of the GRECO study investigators1Pulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, Farmington Hills, MI, USA; 2OK Clinical Research, LLC, Edmond, OK, USA; 3AstraZeneca, Mölndal, Sweden; 4AstraZeneca, Gaithersburg, MD, USACorrespondence: Gary T FergusonPulmonary Research Institute of Southeast Michigan, 29255 West 10 Mile Road, Suite A, Farmington Hills, MI 48336, USATel +1-248-478-6806Fax +1-248-478-6908Email garytferguson@msn.comPurpose: Accessorized prefilled syringes (APFS) have demonstrated functionality and reliability for subcutaneous (SC) delivery, including self-administration, of benralizumab 30 mg in the clinic or at home. The multicenter, open-label GRECO study (NCT02918071) assessed functionality and reliability of a single-use autoinjector (AI) for at-home benralizumab administration by patients or their caregivers.Patients and methods: Adults with severe asthma received benralizumab SC injections at the study site at Weeks 0, 4, and 8. The first dose was administered by health care providers. Patients/caregivers had the option of administering the second dose and were required to administer the third dose under supervision. At Weeks 12 and 16, patients/caregivers administered benralizumab via AI at home. After each administration, patients/caregivers completed questionnaires concerning administration and device functioning. All AI devices used were returned for evaluation.Results: A total of 595 AIs were used for 121 patients (mean age 48.5 years; 64% female) in the clinic and at home. Of 116 participants, 113 (97.4%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 92.63–99.46) and 112 (96.6%; 95% CI: 91.41–99.05) successfully administered benralizumab at home at Weeks 12 and 16, respectively; 108 (93.1%; 95% CI: 86.86–96.98) were successful on both occasions. Throughout the study, 10 (1.7%) AI administrations were unsuccessful: 8 (1.3%) because of user error, 1 (0.2%) with undetermined cause, and 1 (0.2%) because of a manufacturing defect. Benralizumab efficacy (assessed by Asthma Control Questionnaire 6 score) and pharmacokinetics for patients using the AI were comparable to published results for patients receiving benralizumab via syringe in a clinical setting. No new or unexpected safety findings were observed.Conclusion: AIs were functional, reliable, and performed well in the clinic and at home. Nearly all patients and caregivers successfully administered SC benralizumab via AI. Benralizumab availability in AI and APFS could provide patients with choices for self-administration.Keywords: Autoinjector, benralizumab, biologic, clinical trial, delivery system, eosinophil, prefilled syringe, subcutaneous

Thérèse M Sassalos,1 Yannis M Paulus1,2 1Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, W.K. Kellogg Eye Center, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 2Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA Abstract: Intravitreal injections of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) medications play an increasingly critical role in numerous retinal vascular diseases. Initially, anti-VEGF medications came in vials that had to be drawn up by the physician into a syringe for administration. In 2018, the US Food and Drug Administration (US FDA) approved the ranibizumab 0.3 mg prefilled syringe (PFS), and in October 2016, the US FDA approved the ranibizumab 0.5 mg PFS. This article discusses the advantages of the PFS, including reduced injection time, possible reduced risk of endophthalmitis, reduction in intraocular air bubbles and silicone oil droplets, and improved precision in the volume and dose of intravitreal ranibizumab administered, along with possible disadvantages. Implications of the innovation of the PFS on intravitreal injection technique and clinical practice pattern are discussed and reviewed. Keywords: intravitreal injection, intravitreous injection, anti-VEGF, ranibizumab, prefilled syringe, diabetic retinopathy

Introduction: Etrolizumab is a novel, dual-action anti-β7 integrin antibody studied in phase 3 trials in patients with inflammatory bowel disease. An autoinjector (AI) is being developed in parallel to complement the prefilled syringe with needle safety device (PFS-NSD) for subcutaneous (SC) administration in these trials. Here we demonstrate the comparable pharmacokinetics, tolerability, and safety of both devices.Methods: This randomized, open-label, two-part study in healthy participants evaluated the comparability of etrolizumab exposure between the AI and the PFS-NSD. Part 1 (pilot) involved a small number of participants, and initial results were used to finalize the design of the larger part 2 (pivotal) study. In both parts, participants were randomly assigned to receive a single SC dose of etrolizumab 105 mg by AI or PFS-NSD. Randomization was stratified by body weight. Primary pharmacokinetic outcomes were Cmax, AUClast, and AUC0-inf.Results: One hundred and eighty healthy participants (part 1, n = 30; part 2, n = 150) received a single SC dose of etrolizumab by AI or PFS-NSD. Primary pharmacokinetic results from part 1 supported modification of the part 2 study design. Results from part 2 demonstrated that etrolizumab exposure was equivalent between devices, with geometric mean ratios (GMRs) between AI and PFS-NSD of 102% (90% confidence interval [CI] 94.2-111) for Cmax, 98.0% (90% CI 89.3-107) for AUClast, and 97.6% (90% CI 88.6-107) for AUC0-inf. Median tmax and mean terminal t1/2 were also similar between devices. GMRs and 90% CIs of all primary pharmacokinetic parameters were fully contained within the predefined equivalence limits (80-125%).Conclusion: This pharmacokinetic study demonstrated that single SC injections of etrolizumab 105 mg using an AI or a PFS-NSD resulted in equivalent etrolizumab exposure and similar safety and tolerability in healthy participants. Taken together, these results support the use of an AI for etrolizumab administration.Trial Registration: NCT02996019. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

[Display omitted] Formulating biopharmaceuticals is a challenging task due to their complex and sensitive nature. Protein drugs are typically marketed either as an aqueous solution or as a lyophilizate. Usually aqueous solutions are preferred as neither drying nor reconstitution are required. But it may be unfeasible if the protein features low stability. An interesting alternative to avoid at least reconstitution are protein powder suspensions in non-aqueous vehicles. Such formulations combine the ready-to-use approach with the high protein stability in the solid state. Additionally, protein powder suspensions offer a potentially lower viscosity compared to aqueous solutions at high protein concentrations. Besides injection, other application routes might also benefit from the protein powder approach such as topical or inhalational delivery. Protein powders, which can be dispersed in the non-aqueous suspension vehicle, are usually prepared by spray-drying or freeze-drying with an additional milling step, but other techniques have also been described in literature. An ideal powder preparation technique results in minimum protein damage and yields particle sizes in the lower micrometre range and homogeneous particle size distribution enabling subcutaneous or intramuscular injection through hypodermic needles. As suspension vehicles traditional non-aqueous injectable liquids, such as plant oils, may be selected. But they show an inherent high viscosity, which can lead to unacceptable glide forces during injection. Furthermore, the vehicle should provide high product stability with respect to protein integrity and suspension resuspendability. This review will describe how proteins can be formulated as protein powder suspensions in non-aqueous vehicles for subcutaneous injection including potential vehicles, protein powder preparation techniques, protein and suspension physical stability, as well as the use in the field of high concentration protein formulations. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A new development in drug compounding is the production of ready-to-administer sterilized prefilled syringes. A challenge with these syringes is the method of terminal sterilization. There is no information available whether water cascade sterilization is a suitable method. We investigated the effect of this sterilization method on cyclic olefin (co)polymer (CCP/COC) syringes.

Purpose: Injection devices for administration of biopharmaceuticals enable subcutaneous self-administration by patients. To meet patient specific capabilities, injection forces need to be characterized. We address the open question of whether tissue resistance significantly contributes to overall injection forces, especially for large injection volumes. Methods: Subcutaneous tissue resistance was systematically quantified for injection volumes up to 11 mL depending on viscosity (1–20 mPa·s) and injection rates (0.025–0.2 mL/s) using Göttingen Minipigs as the animal model. The contribution of an artificially applied external force at the injection site simulating autoinjector needle cover depression was tested between 2.5–7.5 N. Results: Tissue resistance reached average values of ~120 mbar for injection volumes up to 11 mL independent of viscosity and injection rate, and maximum values of 300 mbar were determined. Artificially applied external forces led to higher values, independent of the absolute applied force — maximum values of 1 bar were obtained when injecting 4.5 mL of the 20 mPa·s solution at an injection rate of 0.1 mL/s with the application of an artificial 5 N force, corresponding to ~450 mbar. All conditions yield defined injection sites suggesting tissue resistance is defined by mechanical properties of the subcutaneous tissue. Conclusions: We set our results in relation to overall injection forces, concluding that maximum values in tissue resistance may cause challenges during subcutaneous injection when using injection devices. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Methotrexate is the most commonly used disease-modifying antirheumatic drug recommended in the treatment of juvenile idiopathic arthritis. It can be administered orally or subcutaneously, the latter method is associated with fewer side effects and higher drug bioavailability. Nevertheless, the pain associated with injection is a considerable drawback of this treatment option in the pediatric population. Currently, there are two single-use subcutaneous injection devices available: the prefilled syringe and the prefilled pen. This prospective, two-sequence crossover study aimed to compare ease of use, frequency of therapy side effects, injection-site pain and parent/patient preference of those methotrexate parenteral delivery systems. Methods: Twenty-three patients with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, already treated with subcutaneous methotrexate in the form of prefilled syringe in the period October 2018 – April 2019 completed a questionnaire evaluating their experience with this device. Subsequently, children received a one-month supply of pen autoinjector and completed the same questionnaire, regarding their experience with the new methotrexate delivery system. If the patient was not performing the injections himself the questionnaires were completed by the caregiver administrating MTX. The results obtained in both questionnaires were compared using the Wilcoxon matched-pairs signed-rank test. Results: 82,6% patients and their caregivers voted for the prefilled pen as their preferred method of subcutaneous methotrexate administration. Moreover, the injection with the prefilled pen was reported as less painful in comparison to the prefilled syringe (p < 0.01). Side effects of methotrexate were less pronounced after the prefilled pen treatment, this difference was most prominent regarding gastrointestinal adverse events associated with the injection (p < 0.01). Conclusion: Administration of methotrexate using the pen device is a promising way of subcutaneous methotrexate delivery in children with juvenile idiopathic arthritis, as the injection is less painful and associated with fewer side effects. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Aims: The aim of the study was to compare the pharmacokinetics (PK), safety and tolerability of secukinumab with different devices for subcutaneous (s.c.) administration of 2 mL. Methods: A phase 1 study in healthy subjects with 6 devices to administer 2 mL injection volumes was conducted to evaluate the serum PK, safety and tolerability of secukinumab following single s.c. injection of 300 mg in the abdomen (either side) or in the thigh (either leg). Primary PK endpoints were maximum observed serum concentration and area under the serum concentration–time curve. The impact of device, site and side of injection on serum exposure was evaluated. In a phase 3 study in psoriasis patients, PK of secukinumab was evaluated following multiple s.c. injections of 300 mg by either 2 × 1‐mL prefilled syringe or 1 × 2‐mL prefilled syringe. Results: Mean serum concentration–time profiles for administration as 2 × 1 mL injections or as 1 × 2 mL injections were similar. With an injection volume of 2 mL, perceived injection pain was not different from 2 × 1 mL injections. A nonclinically significant difference in PK endpoints was observed between thigh and abdomen. Results with a 2 mL prefilled syringe in a 1‐year phase 3 study in patients confirmed PK results observed in the phase 1 study. Conclusion: Collective evidence from both studies demonstrated that 2‐mL injections of secukinumab into the abdomen or thigh using different devices resulted in comparable PK characteristics and were all well tolerated without noticeable local reactions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Compared to glass prefilled syringes (PFSs), cyclic olefin polymer (COP) PFS showed more consistent and predictable extrusion forces when exposed to a variety of excipient combinations (buffers, tonicity agents, and surfactants) at various accelerated storage conditions. Furthermore, COP PFSs also showed significantly less variance in extrusion forces within each individual stroke, which is critical for precision applications. Observed performance differences can be explained by fundamental differences in the stability and homogeneity of the primary packaging materials (i.e., COP vs siliconized glass) and their physicochemical interactions with excipients., (© PDA, Inc. 2024.)

Aim: The current study compared preparation time, errors, satisfaction, and preference for a prefilled syringe (PFS) versus two RSV vaccines requiring reconstitution (VRR1 and VRR2) in a randomized, single-blinded time and motion study., Methods: Pharmacists, nurses, and pharmacy technicians were randomized to a preparation sequence of the three vaccines. Participants read instructions, then consecutively prepared the three vaccines with a 3-5-min washout period in between. Preparations were video recorded and reviewed by a trained pharmacist for preparation time and errors using predefined, vaccine-specific checklists. Participant demographics, satisfaction with vaccine preparation, and vaccine preference were recorded. Within-subjects analysis of variance was used to compare preparation time. Mixed-effects Poisson and ordered logistic regression models were used to compare the number of preparation errors and satisfaction scores, respectively., Results: Sixty-three pharmacists (60%), nurses (35%), and pharmacy technicians (5%) participated at four sites in the United States. The least squares mean preparation time per dose for PFS was 141.8 s (95% CI = 156.8-126.7; p  <.0001) faster than for VRR1, 103.6 s (95% CI = 118.7-88.5; p  <.0001) faster than for VRR2, and 122.7 s (95% CI = 134.2-111.2; p  <.0001) faster than the pooled VRRs. Overall satisfaction (combined "Very" and "Extremely") was 87.3% for PFS, 28.6% for VRR1, and 47.6% for VRR2. Most participants (81.0%) preferred the PFS vaccine., Limitations: The study is limited by the inability to completely blind observers. To minimize the effects of order, we utilized a 3-sequence block design; however, the order in which the vaccines were prepared may have affected outcomes. Participants were assessed once, whereas if repeated preparations were performed there may have been trained efficiencies gained for each vaccine., Conclusion: PFS vaccines can greatly simplify the vaccine preparation process, allowing administrators to prepare almost four times more doses per hour than with vial and syringe systems.

The sterile barrier is one of the most important aspects of the container closure integrity (CCI) for a prefilled syringe (PFS or syringe). This crucial barrier enables the protection of the syringe contents from contamination. The plunger stopper (stopper) is naturally in a stationary position that is controlled by the static friction between the plunger stopper and the syringe barrel wall. When an applied force is greater than the static friction, which is commonly known as the break-loose force, the plunger stopper will move. In such conditions, the stopper movement can further be increased if an air bubble (AB) is introduced between the liquid fill in the syringe and the stopper during the stoppering process. This additional movement can occur when the pressure differential between the gaseous headspace inside the syringe and the external atmosphere is large enough that the force exerted on the stopper exceeds the break-loose force of the syringe. This can occur during altitude or temperature changes incurred during aerial or mountainous transport. This article, therefore, discusses the relationship between stopper movement and initial headspace (air bubble size/ABS) in a 2.25 mL Type I glass syringe using theoretical and empirical approaches. The results showed the maximum initial headspace needed to enable CCI at specified altitudes and plunger stopper movements for the syringe-plunger stopper combination used in the study. Empirical data also indicated that CCI can be maintained for this syringe-plunger stopper combination with up to 9.0 mm initial headspace at altitudes up to 17,000 feet., (© PDA, Inc. 2023.)

Prefilled syringes (PFS) constitute a widely used medical device for drug delivery particularly for the drugs of biological origin. Interactions between the product contents and the components of the PFS play a critical role in determining the suitability of selected PFS. A diluent (with benzyl alcohol/BzOH as a preservative) containing PFS used for reconstitution of the lyophilized product revealed a systematic decrease in the BzOH content during accelerated and stress stability program. Investigation was carried out to understand and identify the underlying causes of this phenomenon. BzOH has a varying propensity to bind to the rubber components (stopper and tip-cap) of the PFS. Vapor permeation behavior across the tip-cap of the PFS was studied via headspace-gas chromatography-mass spectroscopy (HS-GC-MS) enabled analysis. Depending on the properties of the rubber components, BzOH can not only bind but also traverse across them, resulting in a systematic loss during the course of the stability. PFS can allow not only water vapor permeation across the tip-cap as shown in previous studies, but also molecules like benzyl alcohol. This phenomenon stresses the need for careful selection of the components of the primary packaging and also provides an opportunity to deploy novel tools like HS-GC-MS in the early selection of the optimal primary packaging configuration. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: BI 695501 has shown similar efficacy, safety, and immunogenicity to the adalimumab reference product, Humira®. We present two phase 1 studies comparing the pharmacokinetics, safety, and immunogenicity of BI 695501 delivered via autoinjector (AI) vs. prefilled syringe (PFS).Methods: Both trials were randomized, open-label, parallel-group studies undertaken in subjects aged ≥ 18-65 years. VOLTAIRE®-AI (NCT02606903) recruited healthy, Caucasian, male, non-athletic volunteers with BMI ≥ 18 to ≤ 30 kg/m2. VOLTAIRE®-TAI (NCT02899338) recruited healthy men and women with BMI > 17.5 to < 35 kg/m2. In both studies, a single dose of BI 695501 40 mg was administered via AI or PFS to the abdomen (VOLTAIRE®-AI) or thigh (VOLTAIRE®-TAI). The observation period was 43/57 days and the safety follow-up was 70 days. Co-primary endpoints were AUC0-1032 or AUC0-1368, Cmax, and AUC0-∞. Safety and immunogenicity were assessed.Results: Subjects (VOLTAIRE®-AI: N = 71; VOLTAIRE®-TAI: N = 162) were randomized to AI (n = 35; n = 81) or PFS (n = 36; n = 81). Baseline characteristics were balanced between treatment groups in each study. Total exposure of BI 695501 was similar for both groups; adjusted geometric mean ratios for AUC0-∞, AUC0-1032, and Cmax were 106.17, 104.09, and 114.83%, respectively, for VOLTAIRE®-AI; 103.19, 101.71 (AUC0-1368), and 100.11% for VOLTAIRE®-TAI. In both studies, similar immunogenicity was observed between groups in terms of frequency of binding and neutralizing anti-drug antibody-positive subjects. Incidence of adverse events was similar for both groups.Conclusions: Pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity of BI 695501 delivered via AI were similar to administration using a PFS, independent of injection site. No differences are expected between AI and PFS use in clinical practice.Funding: Boehringer Ingelheim. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Vaccine-related errors (VREs) result from mistakes in vaccine preparation, handling, storage, or administration. We aimed to assess physicians’ and nurses’ experiences of VREs in South Korea, focusing on reconstitution issues, and to understand the barriers to and facilitators of preventing them. This was a cross-sectional study using an internet-based survey to examine experiences of reconstitution-related errors, and experience or preference with regard to ready-to-use vaccines (RTU) by physicians and nurses. A total of 700 participants, including 250 physicians and 450 nurses, responded to the questionnaire. In total, 76.4% and 41.5% of the physicians and nurses, respectively, reported an error related to reconstituted vaccines. All errors had been reported as experienced by between 4.9% and 52.0% of physicians or nurses. The errors were reported to occur in more than one in 100 vaccinations for inadequate shaking of vaccines by 28.0% of physicians and 6.9% of nurses, incomplete aspiration of reconstitution vials by 28.0% of physicians and 6.4% of nurses, and spillage or leakage during reconstitution by 20.8% of physicians and 6.9% of nurses. A total of 94.8% of physicians had experience with RTU vaccines, and all preferred RTU formulations. In conclusion, this study highlights the high frequency and types of reconstitution-related errors in South Korea. RTU vaccines could help reduce the time needed for preparation and reduce the risk of errors in South Korea.

Purpose: To compare the risk of transient vision loss (TVL) probably attributable to a severe intraocular pressure spike after intravitreal aflibercept application using the novel prefilled syringe (PFS) vs. the established vial system (VS)., Methods: Datasets of the intravitreal injection service of the Ludwig Maximilians-University Munich and the Technical University Munich, Germany, were screened for documentation of TVL after intravitreal injection of aflibercept. The observation period included two full months prior to the introduction of the novel PFS and two months afterwards. TVL was defined as loss of perception of hand motion for a duration of >30 s., Results: Over a period of four months, 1720 intravitreal injections of aflibercept were administered in 672 patients. There were 842 injections with the old VS, and 878 injections using the novel PFS. Using the VS, TVL was noted during two injections (0.24%) in two patients, as compared to 11 cases of TVL (1.25%) in 10 patients with the PFS ( p  = 0.015). Using the PFS, patients had a 5.3-fold risk of TVL as compared to the VS (OR: 5.33; 95% CI: 1.2-24.1; p  = 0.0298)., Conclusion: There was a more than five-fold risk of TVL using the novel pre-filled aflibercept syringe as compared to the established vial system. During informed consent, this risk should be discussed., Competing Interests: JK received previous speaker honoraria from Novartis Pharma GmbH. BS received previous speaker honoraria and travel expenses from Novartis Pharma GmbH and Topcon Corporation. MM received previous speaker honoraria from Novartis Pharma GmbH, Allergan GmbH, Bayer AG, Heidelberg Engineering GmbH, and Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, and research grants for clinical trials Bayer AG, Novartis Pharma GmbH, and Roche AG. SP received previous speaker honoraria, personal consultation honoraria and travel expenses from Novartis Pharma GmbH, Oertli AG, Bayer AG, Alcon Pharma GmbH and Allergan GmbH. JS received previous speaker honoraria, personal consultations honoraria and travel expenses from Apellis Pharmaceuticals GmbH, Novartis Pharma GmbH, Bayer AG, Roche AG, Carl Zeiss Meditec AG, Oculentis OSD Medical GmbH and Allergan GmbH. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2023 Klaas, Bui, Maierhofer, Schworm, Maier, Priglinger and Siedlecki.)

Purpose: To evaluate the effect of syringe type on developing sustained intraocular pressure (IOP) increases. Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients in a single academic center receiving antivascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) injections from 2012 to 2022 for various indications. Patients were grouped by anti-VEGF treatment of either vial-drawn or prefilled syringe delivery. Trends in IOP were recorded for 1 year after treatment began. Development of sustained IOP increase, ocular hypertension, and glaucoma was recorded. Sustained IOP increase was defined as ≥5 mm Hg above baseline for at least 4 weeks. Results : Of 257 total patients, 6 (2.3%) developed sustained IOP increases throughout the study's duration. No significant differences were noted with respect to prefilled versus vial-drawn syringe status on the development of sustained IOP increases or incident glaucoma (IOP: 1.8% vs 2.7%, respectively, P  = .65; glaucoma: 0.0% vs 2.0%, respectively, P  = .14). Patients treated with prefilled syringes were significantly less likely to develop ocular hypertension (2.8% vs 8.8%, P  < .05). Conclusions: This study found that aflibercept intravitreal injection with prefilled syringes was not associated with a significant increase in IOP-related adverse effects when compared with those treated with vial-drawn syringes., Competing Interests: The author(s) declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: Dr. Rachitskaya reports grant support from AGTC, Apellis, Genentech, NGM, and Novartis and consulting fees from Alcon, Apellis Genentech, Novartis, Regeneron, Zeiss. Dr. Talcott reports speaking fees from Genentech, grant support from Zeiss, and consulting fees from Genentech, Eyepoint, Apellis, and Regenxbio. Dr. Singh reports personal fees from Genentech/Roche, Alcon/Novartis, Zeiss, Bausch + Lomb, and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals and grant support from Apellis and Graybug. Dr. Sharma reports personal consulting fees from Alimera, Abbvie, Clearside, Eyepoint, Genentech/Roche, Bausch + Lomb, Regenxbio, and Regeneron and contracted research funding to his institution from Gilead, Abbvie, Genentech/Roche, Santen, and IONIS., (© The Author(s) 2023.)

Canakinumab, a high‐affinity human anti‐interleukin‐1β monoclonal antibody, is being used for the treatment of a broad spectrum of inflammatory diseases. This phase 1 study compared the relative bioavailability of a single dose of subcutaneous canakinumab either self‐administered with an autoinjector (AI) or administered by a health care professional (HCP) with a prefilled safety syringe (SS) in healthy subjects. The study enrolled 80 subjects randomized 1:1 to receive 150 mg/mL of a liquid formulation of canakinumab via an AI or SS into either the thigh or abdomen. The geometric mean ratio (90% confidence interval [CI]) of Cmax was 1.09 (0.97‐1.21), AUClast was 1.06 (0.96‐1.17), and AUCinf was 1.05 (0.94‐1.18) for the AI versus SS. The 2‐sided 90%CIs that compared self‐administration with the AI versus administration by an HCP using the SS were entirely within the bioequivalence limits of 80%‐125%. Two subjects in the AI group and 1 in the SS group experienced mild injection‐site reactions. No immunogenicity response was detected in the 307 samples analyzed for immunogenicity. No discontinuations because of adverse events were reported in this trial. Canakinumab administration with an AI or SS has a comparable bioavailability, meeting bioequivalence criteria. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prefilled syringes (PFSs) are increasingly preferred over vials as container closure systems (CCSs) for injectable drug products when facilitated or self-administration is required. However, PFSs are more complex compared to CCSs consisting of vial, rubber stopper, and crimp cap. Container closure integrity (CCI) assurance and verification has been a specific challenge for PFSs as they feature several sealing areas. A comprehensive understanding of the CCS is necessary for an appropriate CCI assessment as well as for packaging development and qualification. A comprehensive CCI assessment of 6 different PFSs from 3 different manufacturers (including 1 polymeric PFS) was conducted using helium leak testing. PFS components were manipulated to systematically assess the contribution of the different sealing areas to CCI, namely rigid needle shield (RNS)/needle, RNS/tip cone, and the individual ribs of a syringe plunger. The polymeric PFS required an equilibrium measurement for accurate container closure integrity testing. The different sealing areas and a single plunger rib were shown to provide adequate CCI. Acceptable tip cap movement until the point of CCI failure was estimated. The assessment of acceptable tip cap movement demonstrated the importance of considering the RNS/tip cone seal design to ensure CCI of the PFS upon post assembly possesses and shipment. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Sarilumab is a human monoclonal antibody that blocks the interleukin-6 receptor alpha (IL-6Rα). The phase 3 SARIL-RA-EASY study (EASY) assessed the robustness of an autoinjector (pen) for administering sarilumab when used by adults with active moderate-to-severe rheumatoid arthritis (RA) who are candidates for anti-IL-6R therapy in an unsupervised real-world setting.Methods: EASY was a 12-week, multicenter, randomized, open-label, parallel-group usability study of the sarilumab pen and prefilled syringe. Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 to sarilumab 150 or 200 mg every 2 weeks (q2w) administered via pen or syringe, plus background disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs. Patients reported their ability to remove the pen cap and initiate and complete injections; negative responses were defined as product technical complaints (PTCs). The primary endpoint was the number of validated product technical failures (PTFs; PTC with a validated technical cause). This study was not powered to demonstrate bioequivalence or differences in efficacy among groups.Results: A total of 217 patients were randomized. There were 600 successful injections with the sarilumab pen in 108 patients and no pen-associated PTFs. One PTC was observed (the pen was mistakenly activated before injection). At week 12, 88% of patients indicated the pen was “easy” to use, and 98% reported they were “satisfied” with the pen. Proportions of patients achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20/50/70 response and a 28-joint disease activity score by C-reactive protein < 2.6 were similar at each dose between the pen and syringe groups, as were the pharmacokinetics. There were no clinically meaningful differences in adverse events (AEs), serious AEs, and AEs leading to discontinuation in the pen and syringe groups. The most common treatment-emergent AEs were infections and neutropenia.Conclusion: This study demonstrated the ease of use and robustness of the sarilumab pen when used by patients with RA in an unsupervised setting. Pharmacokinetics, safety, and efficacy were generally similar for the pen and syringe groups (NCT02057250).Funding: Sanofi Genzyme and Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Trial Registration: Clinicaltrials.gov identifier, NCT02057250. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]