Search

Copyright of Clinical Research in Cardiology Supplements is the property of Springer Nature and its content may not be copied or emailed to multiple sites or posted to a listserv without the copyright holder's express written permission. However, users may print, download, or email articles for individual use. This abstract may be abridged. No warranty is given about the accuracy of the copy. Users should refer to the original published version of the material for the full abstract. (Copyright applies to all Abstracts.)

Abstract Background Coronary computed tomography angiography has become the foremost noninvasive imaging modality of the coronary arteries and is used as an alternative to the reference standard, conventional coronary angiography, for direct visualization and detection of coronary artery stenoses in patients with suspected coronary artery disease. Nevertheless, there is considerable debate regarding the optimal target population to maximize clinical performance and patient benefit. The most obvious indication for noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography in patients with suspected coronary artery disease would be to reliably exclude significant stenosis and, thus, avoid unnecessary invasive conventional coronary angiography. To do this, a test should have, at clinically appropriate pretest likelihoods, minimal false-negative outcomes resulting in a high negative predictive value. However, little is known about the influence of patient characteristics on the clinical predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography. Previous regular systematic reviews and meta-analyses had to rely on limited summary patient cohort data offered by primary studies. Performing an individual patient data meta-analysis will enable a much more detailed and powerful analysis and thus increase representativeness and generalizability of the results. The individual patient data meta-analysis is registered with the PROSPERO database (CoMe-CCT, CRD42012002780). Methods/Design The analysis will include individual patient data from published and unpublished prospective diagnostic accuracy studies comparing coronary computed tomography angiography with conventional coronary angiography. These studies will be identified performing a systematic search in several electronic databases. Corresponding authors will be contacted and asked to provide obligatory and additional data. Risk factors, previous test results and symptoms of individual patients will be used to estimate the pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease. A bivariate random-effects model will be used to calculate pooled mean negative and positive predictive values as well as sensitivity and specificity. The primary outcome of interest will be positive and negative predictive values of coronary computed tomography angiography for the presence of coronary artery disease as a function of pretest likelihood of coronary artery disease, analyzed by meta-regression. As a secondary endpoint, factors that may influence the diagnostic performance and clinical value of computed tomography, such as heart rate and body mass index of patients, number of detector rows, and administration of beta blockade and nitroglycerin, will be investigated by integrating them as further covariates into the bivariate random-effects model. Discussion This collaborative individual patient data meta-analysis should provide answers to the pivotal question of which patients benefit most from noninvasive coronary computed tomography angiography and thus help to adequately select the right patients for this test.

Background.: The favorable prognostic significance of normalTl stress perfusion images, even in the presence of known coronary artery disease, has been well documented. Relatively few data are available with regard to the prognostic significance of normal planar and single-photon emission computed tomographic (SPECT) stressTc-labeled sestamibi (Tc-sestamibi) images. Methods and Results.: The prognostic significance of normal exerciseTc-sestamibi myocardial perfusion imaging was evaluated in 208 consecutive patients. All patients were referred for evaluation of chest pain syndrome. One hundred eight patients (52%) underwent SPECT imaging, 79 patients (38%) underwent planar imaging, and 21 patients (10%) underwent both planar and SPECT imaging. One hundred seventy-five patients (84%) had a normal or nondiagnostic exercise electrocardiogram, and 33 patients (16%) had a positive exercise electrocardiogram. Follow-up was 13.5 ±2 months and was complete in 99.5% of patients. No patient died of cardiac causes during follow-up. One patient (0.5%) had a nonfatal myocardial infarction and four patients (2%) had unstable angina necessitating revascularization. There was no difference in rate of cardiac events between men and women or whether SPECT or planar imaging was used. However, 33 patients with normalTc-sestamibi imaging and a positive exercise electrocardiogram had a significantly higher cardiac event rate than had patients with negative exercise electrocardiograms (9% vs 1%, p < 0.025). Conclusion: Patients with normalTc-sestamibi exercise SPECT or planar imaging results and a normal or nondiagnostic exercise electrocardiogram have a favorable 1-year prognosis. Patients with normalTc-sestamibi images and a positive stress electrocardiogram have a less favorable outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]