1. A Clinical Study of Efficacy of Diathermy Incision Vs Scalpel Incision in Patients Undergoing Open Hernia Surgery.
- Author
-
sahoo, Satya prakash, Pradhan, Jagannath, Pahi, Soudamini, Duari, Rathin Kumar, Nayak, Sanjit Kumar, and Patra, Sanghamitra
- Subjects
- *
DIATHERMY , *HERNIA surgery , *MANN Whitney U Test , *INGUINAL hernia , *SURGICAL complications , *VISUAL analog scale - Abstract
Introduction: An incision is a slit or cut used to get access to deeper tissues. Electro cautery is a medical procedure that involves burning a specific portion of the body to remove or close it. Although worries of severe scarring and slower wound healing have limited its use for skin incision, electro-cautery is becoming increasingly often used for tissue dissection. Materials and methods: In this prospective randomised study, 60 patients undergoing mesh plasty for inguinal hernia were divided into two groups. In Group A, a skin incision is produced using electrocautery, while Group B uses a scalpel. The two groups are compared in terms of postoperative discomfort, wound complications, and the use of analgesics. Finally, the Mann-Whitney U Test is used to assess and compare the results for the two groups. Results: Pain will be measured six, twelve, and twenty-four hours after surgery using a graphical visual analogue scale. In the event that the pain score exceeds 4, INJ.DICLOFENAC 50 mg IM will be administered. In the post-operative phase, complications recorded in hospital stay are quantified by means of Seroma-discharge of serous collection at suture site, and Hematoma-blood collection. Conclusion: The outcomes of both groups, namely the diathermy and Scalpel groups, have been proven to be equivalent based on the findings of this research of the following: 1) postoperative pain, 2) the need for analgesics, and 3) wound complications after surgery. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024