Search

Inferior vena cava thrombosis (IVCT) is rare. Thrombophilia is one of the important risk factors. It is also uncommon for gene mutations in F9 gene to cause thrombosis but not hemorrhage. A 35-year-old male patient was admitted to our department with left lower limb swelling without an obvious cause for 1 day. Through contrast-enhanced computed tomography and color Doppler ultrasound, he was found to have lower extremity deep vein thrombosis, IVCT and pulmonary embolism. Through whole-exome sequencing analysis, he was found to carry a 925.7 kb duplication (chrX:137939698-138865419, hg19) encompassing ATP11C , SRD5A1P1 , MCF2 , FGF13 and F9 genes. This duplication of F9 gene was not detected in his parents. Other thrombophilic genes defects were not found. The factor IX activities of this patient, his father and mother were 194, 70 and 148, respectively. He was treated with catheter-directed thrombolysis, AngioJet-assisted pharmaco-mechanical thromboectomy and manual aspiration thromboectomy. Complete recanalization of left femoral, iliac veins and inferior vena cava was achieved. F9 gene duplication is a rare mutation, which can induce multiple venous thrombosis through increasing the activity level of factor IX in plasma. IVCT is a serious type of venous thrombosis. Personalized intervention treatment plans should be developed based on the different clinical characteristics of each case to achieve a higher benefit-risk ratio., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Targeted therapy is used to treat lung adenocarcinoma caused by epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain and rare subtypes (<5%) of non-small cell lung cancer. These subtypes include fusion oncoproteins like anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS1, rearranged during transfection (RET), and other receptor tyrosine kinases (RTKs). The use of diverse selective oral inhibitors, including those targeting rat sarcoma viral oncogene homolog (KRAS) mutations, has significantly improved clinical responses, extending progression-free and overall survival., Areas Covered: Resistance remains a critical issue in lung adenocarcinoma, notably in EGFR mutant, echinoderm microtubule associated protein-like 4 (EML4)-ALK fusion, and KRAS mutant tumors, often associated with epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EMT)., Expert Opinion: Despite advancements in next generation EGFR inhibitors and EML4-ALK therapies with enhanced brain penetrance and identifying resistance mutations, overcoming resistance has not been abated. Various strategies are being explored to overcome this issue to achieve prolonged cancer remission and delay resistance. Targeting yes-associated protein (YAP) and the mechanisms associated with YAP activation through Hippo-dependent or independent pathways, is desirable. Additionally, the exploration of liquid-liquid phase separation in fusion oncoproteins forming condensates in the cytoplasm for oncogenic signaling is a promising field for the development of new treatments.

Purpose: To characterize treatment patterns and real-world clinical outcomes of patients with metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) who developed progression on an anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1, herein referred to as anti-PD-(L)1, and platinum-doublet chemotherapy., Methods: Eligible oncologists/pulmonologists in the United States, Europe (France, Germany, and United Kingdom), and Japan completed electronic case report forms for patients with mNSCLC (no evidence of EGFR/ALK/ROS1 alterations). Eligible patients had disease progression on/after an anti-PD-(L)1 and platinum-doublet chemotherapy (received concurrently or sequentially), initiated a subsequent line of therapy (LOT) between 2017 and 2021, and had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status 0-2 at this subsequent LOT initiation (index date). Overall survival (OS), time to treatment discontinuation (TTD), and real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS) after index were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis., Results: Overall, 160 physicians (academic, 54.4%; community, 45.6%) provided deidentified data from 487 patient charts (United States, 141; Europe, 218; Japan, 128; at mNSCLC diagnosis: median age 66 years, 64.7% male, 81.3% nonsquamous, 86.2% de novo mNSCLC; at line of interest initiation: 86.0% ECOG 0-1, 39.6% liver metastases, 18.9% brain metastases, 79.1% smoking history). The most common treatment regimens upon progression after anti-PD-(L)1/platinum-doublet chemotherapy were nonplatinum chemotherapy (50.5%), nonplatinum chemotherapy plus vascular endothelial growth factor receptor inhibitor (12.9%), and platinum-doublet chemotherapy (6.6%). Median OS was 8.8 months (squamous, 7.8 months; nonsquamous, 9.5 months). Median TTD was 4.3 months (squamous, 4.1 months; nonsquamous, 4.3 months). Median rwPFS was 5.1 months (squamous, 4.6 months; nonsquamous, 5.4 months)., Conclusion: In this multiregional, real-world analysis of pooled patient chart data, patients with mNSCLC who had disease progression after anti-PD-(L)1/platinum-doublet chemotherapy had poor clinical outcomes with various treatment regimens, demonstrating an unmet clinical need for effective options after failure on anti-PD-(L)1 and platinum-doublet chemotherapy treatments.

Introduction: Lorlatinib is a potent, brain penetrant, next-generation ALK/ROS1 TKI, with high response rates and durable responses, including the brain. However, a significant drawback is the manifestation of neurocognitive adverse events (NCAEs). Despite being generally low-grade in severity, these NCAEs can be physically and mentally disabling. Extensive neurocognitive testing in this group of patients is lacking; therefore we conducted this study., Patients and Methods: This observational prospective study was conducted across 3 Dutch university hospitals. Patients with metastatic NSCLC with an ALK- or ROS1-rearrangement and having an indication to start lorlatinib in daily clinical practice were eligible. The primary endpoints were to identify changes in neurocognitive functioning, measured through neurocognitive assessment at intervals of 2 weeks and 2 months after starting lorlatinib, in comparison to baseline. As a secondary endpoint, the correlation between neurocognitive impairment and self-reported neurocognitive dysfunction was examined., Results: Between June 2019 and October 2022, 22 patients were included. Among the various neurocognitive tests administered, only the Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised parts b and c demonstrated a significant and clinically relevant decrease in scoring 2 weeks post initiation of lorlatinib (P = .036 and P = .003, respectively). However, these returned to baseline at the 2-month evaluation. The questionnaires did not result in significantly different outcomes over time., Conclusion: Lorlatinib treatment did not result in a sustained and significant decline within any of the specified neurocognitive domains., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Targeted therapies, such as crizotinib and ceritinib, have shown promising results in treating non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with specific oncogenic drivers like anaplastic lymphoma kinase ( ALK ), c-ros ( ROS1 ) oncogene, etc. This study aims to assess the cost-effectiveness of these therapies for patients with NSCLC in India., Methods: The Markov model consisted of three health states: progression-free survival, progressive disease, and death. Lifetime costs and consequences were estimated for three treatment arms: crizotinib, ceritinib, and chemotherapy for patients with ALK - and ROS1 -positive NSCLC. Incremental cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained with crizotinib and ceritinib was compared to chemotherapy and assessed using a willingness-to-pay threshold of one-time per capita gross domestic product in India., Results: The total lifetime cost per patient for ALK -positive NSCLC was ₹332,456 ($4,054 US dollars [USD]), ₹1,284,100 ($15,659 USD), and ₹2,337,779 ($28,509 USD) in the chemotherapy, crizotinib, and ceritinib arms, respectively. The mean QALYs lived per patient were 1.20, 2.21, and 3.34, respectively. For patients with ROS1 -positive NSCLC, the total cost was ₹323,011 ($3,939 USD) and ₹1,763,541 ($21,507 USD) for chemotherapy and crizotinib, with mean QALYs lived per patient of 1.16 and 2.73, respectively. Nearly 92% and 81% reduction in the price of ceritinib and crizotinib is required to make it a cost-effective treatment option for ALK - and ROS1 -positive NSCLC, respectively., Conclusion: Our study findings suggest that the prices of ceritinib and crizotinib need to be reduced significantly to justify their value for inclusion in India's publicly financed health insurance scheme for treatment of patients with locally advanced/metastatic ALK - and ROS1 -positive NSCLC, respectively.

Background: Selecting therapeutic strategies for cancer patients is typically based on key target-molecule biomarkers that play an important role in cancer onset, progression, and prognosis. Thus, there is a pressing need for novel biomarkers that can be utilized longitudinally to guide treatment selection., Methods: Using data from 508 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients across three institutions, we developed and validated a comprehensive predictive biomarker that distinguishes six genotypes and infiltrative immune phenotypes. These features were analyzed to establish the association between radiological phenotypes and tumor genotypes/immune phenotypes and to create a radiological interpretation of molecular features. In addition, we assessed the sensitivity of the models by evaluating their performance at five different voxel intervals, resulting in improved generalizability of the proposed approach., Findings: The radiomics model we developed, which integrates clinical factors and multi-regional features, outperformed the conventional model that only uses clinical and intratumoral features. Our combined model showed significant performance for EGFR, KRAS, ALK, TP53, PIK3CA, and ROS1 mutation status with AUCs of 0.866, 0.874, 0.902, 0.850, 0.860, and 0.900, respectively. Additionally, the predictive performance for PD-1/PD-L1 was 0.852. Although the performance of all models decreased to different degrees at five different voxel space resolutions, the performance advantage of the combined model did not change., Conclusions: We validated multiscale radiomic signatures across tumor genotypes and immunophenotypes in a multi-institutional cohort. This imaging-based biomarker offers a non-invasive approach to select patients with NSCLC who are sensitive to targeted therapies or immunotherapy, which is promising for developing personalized treatment strategies during therapy., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: While crizotinib and entrectinib have been approved to treat ROS1 fusion-positive ( ROS1+ ) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), unmet needs remain. These unmet needs include treatment options for patients with resistance mutations and efficacious options even in the presence of brain metastasis while simultaneously avoiding unwanted neurological side effects., Areas Covered: Taletrectinib was designed to: improve efficacy; overcome resistance to first-generation ROS1 inhibitors; and address central nervous system penetration while conferring fewer neurological adverse events. All of these features are demonstrated and supported by data from the phase I and the regional phase II TRUST-I clinical trial. Here, we describe the preclinical and clinical characteristics of taletrectinib and evaluate the data from phase I and II studies and review the rationale and design of TRUST-II, a global phase II study of taletrectinib, which is enrolling patients in North America, Europe, and Asia., Expert Opinion: Taltrectinib has the potential to improve PFS based on its greater potency against ROS1+ tumors and high CNS penetration. By selectively inhibiting ROS1 wild-type and its resistant mutations over TRKB , taltrectinib has a better safety profile with minimal CNS-related AEs compared to other ROS1+ inhibitors.

Introduction: The present study aimed to monitor peritoneal neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (pNGAL) during peritonitis episodes and to enhance its diagnostic value by evaluating pNGAL at scheduled times in parallel with white blood cell (WBC) count. In addition, we investigated possible correlations between pNGAL and the etiology of peritonitis, evaluating it as a possible marker of the clinical outcome., Methods: Twenty-two patients with peritoneal dialysis (PD)-related peritonitis were enrolled. Peritonitis was divided into Gram-positive, Gram-negative, polymicrobial, and sterile. WBC count and neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in PD effluent were measured at different times (days 0, 1, 5, 10, 15, and/or 20 and 10 days after antibiotic therapy discontinuation). NGAL was measured by standard quantitative laboratory-based immunoassay and by colorimetric NGAL dipstick (NGALds) (dipstick test)., Results: We found strong correlations between peritoneal WBC, laboratory-based NGAL, and NGALds values, both overall and separated at each time point. On day 1, we observed no significant difference in WBC, both NGALds (p = 0.3, 0.9, and 0.2) between Gram-positive, Gram-negative, polymicrobial, and sterile peritonitis. No significant difference has been found between de novo versus relapsing peritonitis for all markers (p &gt; 0.05). We observed a parallel decrease of WBC and both NGAL in patients with favorable outcomes. WBC count and both pNGAL resulted higher in patients with negative outcomes (defined as relapsing peritonitis, peritonitis-associated catheter removal, peritonitis-associated hemodialysis transfer, peritonitis-associated death) at day 10 (p = 0.04, p = 0.03, and p = 0.05, respectively) and day 15 (p = 0.01, p = 0.04, and tendency for p = 0.005). There was a tendency toward higher levels of WBC and NGAL in patients with a negative outcome at day 5. No significant difference in all parameters was proven at day 1 (p = 0.3, p = 0.9, p = 0.2) between groups., Conclusion: This study confirms pNGAL as a valid and reliable biomarker for the diagnosis of PD-peritonitis and its monitoring. Its trend is parallel to WBC count during peritonitis episodes, in particular, patients with unfavorable outcomes., (© 2023 S. Karger AG, Basel.)

Objectives: Obesity and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have a complicated relationship. While weight alone does not cause PsA, it is suspected to cause worse symptoms. Neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) is secreted through various cell types. Our objective was to assess the changes and trajectories in serum NGAL and clinical outcomes in patients with PsA during 12 months of anti-inflammatory treatment., Method: This exploratory prospective cohort study enrolled PsA patients initiating conventional synthetic or biological disease-modifying anti-rheumatic drugs (csDMARDs/bDMARDs). Clinical, biomarker, and patient-reported outcome measures were retrieved at baseline, and 4 and 12 months. Control groups at baseline were psoriasis (PsO) patients and apparently healthy controls. The serum NGAL concentration was quantified by a high-performance singleplex immunoassay., Results: In total, 117 PsA patients started a csDMARD or bDMARD, and were compared indirectly at baseline with a cross-sectional sample of 20 PsO patients and 20 healthy controls. The trajectory in NGAL related to anti-inflammatory treatment for all included PsA patients showed an overall change of -11% from baseline to 12 months. Trajectories in NGAL for patients with PsA, divided into treatment groups, showed no clear trend in clinically significant decrease or increase following anti-inflammatory treatment. NGAL concentrations in the PsA group at baseline corresponded to the levels in the control groups. No correlation was found between changes in NGAL and changes in PsA outcomes., Conclusion: Based on these results, serum NGAL does not add any value as a biomarker in patients with peripheral PsA, either for disease activity or for monitoring.

Brain metastases (BMs) represent the most common intracranial tumors in adults, and most commonly originate from lung, followed by breast, melanoma, kidney, and colorectal cancer. Management of BM is individualized based on the size and number of brain metastases, the extent of extracranial disease, the primary tumor subtype, neurological symptoms, and prior lines of therapy. Until recently, treatment strategies were limited to local therapies, like surgical resection and radiotherapy, the latter in the form of whole-brain radiotherapy or stereotactic radiosurgery. The next generation of local strategies includes laser interstitial thermal therapy, magnetic hyperthermic therapy, post-resection brachytherapy, and focused ultrasound. New targeted therapies and immunotherapies with documented intracranial activity have transformed clinical outcomes. Novel systemic therapies with intracranial utility include new anaplastic lymphoma kinase inhibitors like brigatinib and ensartinib; selective "rearranged during transfection" inhibitors like selpercatinib and pralsetinib; B-raf proto-oncogene inhibitors like encorafenib and vemurafenib; Kirsten rat sarcoma viral oncogene inhibitors like sotorasib and adagrasib; ROS1 gene rearrangement (ROS1) inhibitors, anti-neurotrophic tyrosine receptor kinase agents like larotrectinib and entrectinib; anti-human epidermal growth factor receptor 2/epidermal growth factor receptor exon 20 agent like poziotinib; and antibody-drug conjugates like trastuzumab-emtansine and trastuzumab-deruxtecan. This review highlights the modern multidisciplinary management of BM, emphasizing the integration of systemic and local therapies., Competing Interests: M.S.A. has provided updated disclosures that encompass a range of professional involvements. In terms of grants, he has received support from Seagen. Additionally, his consultations extend to various organizations, including but not limited to Bayer, Novocure, Kiyatec, Insightec, GSK, Xoft, Nuvation, Cellularity, SDP Oncology, Apollomics, Prelude, Janssen, Tocagen, Voyager Therapeutics, Viewray, Caris Lifesciences, Pyramid Biosciences, Varian Medical Systems, Cairn Therapeutics, Anheart Therapeutics, Theraguix, Menarini Ricerche, Sumitomo Pharma Oncology, Autem therapeutics, and GT Medical Technologies. Furthermore, he serves on the Scientific Advisory Board of Cairn Therapeutics, Pyramid Biosciences, Modifi biosciences, and Bugworks. Additionally, his stock holdings include shares in Mimivax, Cytodyn, MedInnovate Advisors LLC, and Trisalus Lifesciences. These disclosures aim to provide transparency regarding his professional engagements and affiliations., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors (IMTs) are often driven by anaplastic lymphoma kinase fusions and less frequently by alternative fusions such as ROS1 . We describe the clinical characteristics, treatment approach, and outcome for a series of young patients with IMTs and ROS1 alterations., Methods: This was a retrospective, international, multicenter study analyzing young patients (younger than 21 years) with ROS1 -altered IMTs treated in 10 European referral centers between 2014 and 2022. Patients were included in the European pediatric Soft tissue sarcoma Study Group NRSTS-2005 protocol or registered in the Soft Tissue Sarcoma Registry. Primary surgery was recommended if a microscopic radical resection was feasible without mutilation. No standard systemic treatment protocol was available, but several medical options were recommended., Results: A total of 19 patients (median age 8.3 years) were included. Most patients had a biopsy at diagnosis (Intergroup Rhabdomyosarcoma Study [IRS] I; n = 2, IRS II; n = 1, IRS III biopsy; n = 11, IRS III resection; n = 3, IRS IV; n = 2). Twelve patients received neoadjuvant systemic therapy in first line (four received multiple treatments): high-dose steroids (n = 2), vinorelbine/vinblastine with methotrexate (n = 6), or ROS1 inhibitors (n = 8). After a median follow-up of 2.8 years (range, 0.2-13.4), seven patients developed an event. The 3-year event-free survival was 41% (95% CI, 11 to 71), and the 3-year overall survival was 100%., Conclusion: Outcome for ROS1 -altered IMTs appears excellent. A complete resection at diagnosis was often not feasible, and most patients needed neoadjuvant therapy. Patients who developed a tumor event could be cured with reinitiation of systemic therapy and/or surgery. This approach illustrates a switch in treatment philosophy moving from immediate, often mutilating, surgery to systemic (targeted) therapy as a bridge to more conservative surgery later in the treatment course.

Up to 15-20% of cancer patients experience one or more episodes of venous thromboembolism during cancer disease. Approximately 80% of all cancer-associated venous thromboembolic events occur in non-hospitalized patients. Routine thromboprophylaxis for outpatients with cancer who start new anticancer treatment is currently not recommended by the international guidelines due to the high heterogeneity of these patients in terms of VTE or bleeding risks, the difficulties in selecting patients at high risk, and the uncertainty of duration of prophylaxis. Although the international guidelines endorsed the Khorana score for estimating the thrombotic risk in ambulatory cancer patients, the discriminatory performance of this score is not completely convincing and varies according to the cancer type. Consequently, a minority of ambulatory patients with cancer receive an accurate screening for primary prophylaxis of VTE. The aim of this review is to provide support to physicians in identifying those ambulatory patients with cancer for whom thromboprophylaxis should be prescribed and those that should not be candidate to thromboprophylaxis. In absence of high bleeding risk, primary thromboprophylaxis should be recommended in patients with pancreatic cancer and, probably, in patients with lung cancer harboring ALK/ROS1 translocations. Patients with upper gastrointestinal cancers are at high risk of VTE, but a careful assessment of bleeding risk should be made before deciding on antithrombotic prophylaxis. Primary prevention of VTE is not recommended in cancer patients at increased risk of bleeding as patients with brain cancer, with moderate-to-severe thrombocytopenia or severe renal impairment., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Società Italiana di Medicina Interna (SIMI).)

Introduction/background: This study was designed to describe real-world changes in biomarker testing among patients with non-squamous, metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) in a community oncology setting from 2015 to 2020., Patients and Methods: This retrospective study randomly selected 500 adult patients diagnosed with nonsquamous mNSCLC to undergo chart review and data extraction. Data were extracted and validated by 2 independent abstractors. Biomarker testing rates were described before and after national guideline updates and FDA approval of targeted agents., Results: At least 1 biomarker test was received by 89.4% of patients with mNSCLC. Of all patients, 46.6%, 34.6%, and 8.2% received both single-gene and next generation sequencing (NGS)-based testing, single-gene testing only, and NGS-based testing only, respectively. However, there were changes in testing rates at the time of drug approvals for targeted agents. Biomarker testing increased for ALK (45.0% before to 78.3% after ALK-targeted drug approval), BRAF (from 20.0% to 67.8%), EGFR (from 20.0% to 78.2%), NTRK (from 34.6% to 55.7%), and ROS1 (increased from 29.6% before approval to 74.2% after). Biomarker testing increased after changes were made to national guidelines for BRAF (from 18.8% before to 68.1% after inclusion in guidelines), NTRK (from 37.2% to 56.5%), and ROS1 (increased from 40.8% to 74.5% after guideline updates). Targeted therapy was received by 62.4% of patients with a positive biomarker., Conclusion: Increases in biomarker testing rates were observed relative to targeted agent approvals and national guideline updates. However, many patients with non-squamous mNSCLC did not receive full genotyping in accordance with national guidelines and represent an opportunity to identify reasons and solutions for barriers to care., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

The randomized, double-blinded, multi-center, phase III GEMSTONE-302 ( NCT03789604 ) study evaluated the efficacy and safety of sugemalimab versus placebo in combination with chemotherapy as first-line treatment for metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). In this study, 479 treatment-naive patients with stage IV squamous or non-squamous NSCLC without known EGFR sensitizing mutations, ALK, ROS1 or RET fusions were randomized (2:1) to receive 1,200 mg of sugemalimab (n = 320) or placebo (n = 159) every 3 weeks in combination with platinum-based chemotherapy for up to four cycles, followed by maintenance therapy with sugemalimab or placebo for squamous NSCLC and sugemalimab or placebo plus pemetrexed for non-squamous NSCLC. Placebo-treated patients could cross over to receive sugemalimab monotherapy on disease progression. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS) and the secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS) and objective response rate. Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy has demonstrated significant PFS prolongation in the primary analysis as reported previously. As of 22 November 2021, the prespecified interim OS analysis showed significant improvement with the addition of sugemalimab to chemotherapy (median OS = 25.4 versus 16.9 months; hazard ratio = 0.65; 95% confidence interval = 0.50-0.84; P = 0.0008). Sugemalimab plus chemotherapy provided superior PFS and OS compared to placebo plus chemotherapy, supporting the use of sugemalimab as a first-line treatment option for metastatic NSCLC., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature America, Inc.)

During the last 2 decades, the understanding of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has evolved from a purely histologic classification system to a more complex model synthesizing clinical, histologic, and molecular data. Biomarker-driven targeted therapies have been approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration for patients with metastatic NSCLC harboring specific driver alterations in EGFR, HER2, KRAS, BRAF, MET, ALK, ROS1, RET, and NTRK. Novel immuno-oncology agents have contributed to improvements in NSCLC-related survival at the population-level. However, only in recent years has this nuanced understanding of NSCLC permeated into the systemic management of patients with resectable tumors., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The AXL signaling pathway is associated with tumor growth as well as poor prognosis in cancer. Here, we highlight recent strategies for targeting AXL in the treatment of solid and hematological malignancies., Recent Findings: AXL is a key player in survival, metastasis, and therapeutic resistance in many cancers. A range of AXL-targeted therapies, including tyrosine kinase inhibitors, monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates, and soluble receptors, have entered clinical development. Notably, AXL inhibitors in combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors demonstrate early promise; however, further understanding of predictive biomarkers and treatment sequencing is necessary. Based on its role in tumor growth and drug resistance, AXL represents a promising therapeutic target in oncology. Results from ongoing clinical trials will provide valuable insights into the role of AXL inhibitors, both as single agents and in combination with other therapies., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)

RET and ROS1 are becoming key targets for targeted therapy. To show current landscape of ROS1 and RET targets, a patent analysis was performed. The present results indicated that inhibitor structures of ROS1 target demonstrated unique elements compared with inhibitor structures of RET or BRAF targets. Our study was the first time to uncover that a number of inhibitor structures of ROS1 target contained sulfur and boron elements. The inhibitors of RET target could be developed for treatment of various cancers, including lung cancer, thyroid cancer, and other solid tumor, while the inhibitors of ROS1 target are virtually developed for treatment of lung cancer. Our findings provide a new insight for drug discovery of ROS1 and RET target.

Brigatinib is a next-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor approved for the treatment of patients with ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A phase 1 drug-drug interaction study was conducted to evaluate the effect of multiple-dose administration of brigatinib on the single-dose pharmacokinetics of midazolam, a sensitive cytochrome P450 3A substrate. In cycle 1, patients with ALK+ or ROS1+ solid tumors, including NSCLC, received a single 3-mg dose of midazolam as an oral solution alone on day 1 and then coadministered with brigatinib on day 21 (brigatinib 90 mg once daily on days 2-8; 180 mg once daily on days 9-28). After cycle 1, patients could continue to receive brigatinib in 28-day treatment cycles. The primary study objective was to characterize the effect of brigatinib 180 mg once daily on midazolam pharmacokinetics. The secondary objective was to assess safety. Exploratory efficacy endpoints included objective response rate and progression-free survival. Brigatinib was generally well tolerated, and safety data were consistent with the known safety profile. Among the 10 patients with ALK+ NSCLC, the confirmed objective response rate was 30% and median progression-free survival was 7.2 months. Coadministration of brigatinib reduced midazolam maximum observed plasma concentration by ≈16% (geometric least-squares mean ratio, 0.836 [90%CI, 0.662-1.056]) and area under the plasma concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity by ≈26% (geometric least-squares mean ratio, 0.741 [90%CI, 0.600-0.915]). Thus, brigatinib is a weak inducer of cytochrome P450 3A in vivo., (© 2023, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Importance: Over the past 10 years, treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) has been continually revolutionized. However, standard clinical trials may not reflect current multiple lines of treatment and corresponding outcomes in a timely manner., Objective: To investigate outcomes associated with new treatment of NSCLC in a clinical setting., Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study included patients with NSCLC between January 1, 2010, and November 30, 2020, who received any anticancer treatment at Samsung Medical Center in Korea. Data were analyzed from November 2021 through February 2022., Exposures: Clinical and pathological stage, histology, and major druggable sequence variation, including epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), ROS1, RET, MET exon 14 skipping, BRAF V600E, KRAS G12C, and NTRK between 2 periods (period I: 2010-2015 vs period II: 2016-2020)., Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the 3-year survival rate of NSCLC. Secondary outcomes included median overall survival, progression-free survival, and recurrence-free survival., Results: Among 21 978 patients with NSCLC (median [range] age at diagnosis, 64.1 [57.0-71.0] years; 13 624 males [62.0%]), there were 10 110 patients in period I and 11 868 patients in period II; adenocarcinoma (AD) was the predominant histology (7112 patients [70.3%] in period I and 8813 patients [74.3%] in period II). There were 4224 never smokers [41.8%] in period I and 5292 never smokers [44.6%] in period II. Compared with patients in period I, patients during period II were more likely to undergo molecular tests in the AD (5678 patients [79.8%] vs 8631 patients [97.9%]) and non-AD (1612 of 2998 patients [53.8%] and 2719 of 3055 patients [89.0%]) groups. In patients with AD in period I, 3-year survival rates were 92.8% (95% CI, 91.8%-93.7%), 72.4% (95% CI, 68.3%-76.8%), 56.7% (95% CI, 53.4%-60.2%), and 28.7% (95% CI, 27.0%-30.4%) for stage I, II, III, and IV, respectively. In period II, 3-year survival rates of patients with AD were 95.1% (95% CI, 94.4%-95.9%), 82.5% (95% CI, 79.1%-86.1%), 65.1% (95% CI, 61.8%-68.6%), and 42.4% (95% CI, 40.3%-44.7%) for each stage, respectively. In patients without AD, 3-year survival rates were 72.0% (95% CI, 68.8%-75.3%), 60.0% (95% CI, 56.2%-64.1%), 38.9% (95% CI, 35.6%-42.5%), and 9.7% (95% CI, 7.9%-12.1%) for each stage in period I. In period II, the 3-year survival rates of patients without AD were 79.3% (95% CI, 76.3%-82.4%), 67.3% (95% CI, 62.8%-72.1%), 48.2% (95% CI, 44.5%-52.3%), and 18.1% (95% CI, 15.1%-21.6%) for each stage., Conclusions and Relevance: In this cohort study of 10 years of clinical data, survival outcomes were improved across all stages, with larger increases in patients with stage III to IV disease. The incidence of never-smokers and the use of molecular testing increased.

Background: Iruplinalkib (WX-0593) is an anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)/c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor. Here we reported the single-arm, phase II study (INTELLECT) results of the efficacy and safety of iruplinalkib for ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients., Methods: ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC patients aged ≥18 years, with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0-2 were eligible. Patients received iruplinalkib 180 mg orally once daily for a 21-day cycle with a 7-day lead-in phase at 60 mg orally once daily. The primary endpoint was the independent review committee (IRC)-assessed objective response rate (ORR)., Results: From August 7, 2019, to October 30, 2020, 146 patients were included. As of the data cut-off date on November 30, 2021, the median follow-up time was 18.2 months (95% confidence interval [CI] 16.8-18.8). IRC-assessed ORR and disease control rate (DCR) were 69.9% (95% CI 61.7-77.2%) and 96.6% (95% CI 92.2-98.9%), respectively. Investigator-assessed ORR and DCR were 63.0% (95% CI 54.6-70.8%) and 94.5% (95% CI 89.5-97.6%), respectively. Investigator-assessed median duration of response and progression-free survival (the same as median time to progression) were 13.2 months (95% CI 10.4-17.7) and 14.5 months (95% CI 11.7-20.0), respectively. Corresponding IRC-assessed results were 14.4 months (95% CI 13.1-not evaluable [NE]), 19.8 months (95% CI 14.5-NE), and NE (95% CI 14.5-NE), respectively. Investigator-assessed intracranial ORRs were 46% (41/90, 95% CI 35-56%) in patients with central nervous system metastases and 64% (27/42, 95% CI 48-78%) in patients with measurable intracranial lesions. Overall survival data were immature. Treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) occurred in 136/146 (93.2%) patients. The most common TRAEs were aspartate aminotransferase increased (63 [43.2%]), alanine aminotransferase increased (54 [37.0%]), and blood creatine phosphokinase increased (51 [34.9%]). Dose interruption, reduction, and discontinuation due to TRAEs occurred in 21 (14.4%), 16 (11.0%), and four (2.7%) patients, respectively., Conclusions: In this study, iruplinalkib (WX-0593) demonstrated favorable efficacy and manageable safety profiles in patients with ALK-positive crizotinib-resistant advanced NSCLC. Iruplinalkib could be a new treatment option for this patient population., Trial Registration: Center for Drug Evaluation of National Medical Products Administration of China: CTR20190789, registered on April 28, 2019; ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04641754, registered on November 24, 2020., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Non-small cell lung cancer with leptomeningeal metastasis (NSCLC-LM) is emerging as a new management challenge for oncologists and is associated with poor prognosis. This study aimed to investigate the molecular characteristics and prognostic factors of NSCLC-LM., Methods: This retrospective study included 97 patients with NSCLC-LM between January 2015 and October 2021. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were evaluated. Gene mutations were detected by next-generation sequencing (NGS)., Results: The median PFS and OS were 8.4 (95 % confidence interval [CI]: 4.839-11.901) and 14.0 (95 % CI: 9.254-18.746) months, respectively. Sixty-seven patients harboured epidermal growth factor receptor-mutated (EGFRm): L858R (34), 19del (29), T790M (13), and G719C with L861Q (1). Other mutations included ALK (5), ROS1 (3), KRAS (1), TP53 (14), MET amplification (6). The detection rate and types of circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) samples were higher than the paired plasma samples. Patients with EGFR mutations had a longer median OS than those without mutations (19.0 vs. 13.0 months, P = 0.015). Patients with gene mutations had shorter median OS than those without mutations, such as ALK (11.8 vs. 19.9 months, P = 0.014), ROS1 (12.7 vs. 19.8 months, P = 0.014), KRAS (4.0 vs. 19.0 months, P = 0.005), TP53 (15.0 vs. 19.0 months, P = 0.014), and MET amplification (6.0 vs. 19.0 months, P = 0.003). Multivariate analysis indicated that MET amplification was an independent predictor of poor survival. Along with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status (ECOG PS) ≥ 3, LM accompanied with brain parenchymal metastasis (BPM), extracranial disease, and seizures were independent predictors of poor survival, whereas intrathecal chemotherapy, and third-generation EGFR-TKIs were independent predictors of favorable survival., Conclusions: CSF ctDNA detected using NGS had a high sensitivity for NSCLC-LM, showing high potential in detecting driver and drug-resistant gene mutations. Genomic profiles, combined with clinically relevant prognostic factors, will guide individualised treatments and improve the outcomes of NSCLC-LM patients., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: Many patients with actionable driver oncogenes (ADOs) are never identified and thus never receive targeted treatment. This study evaluated the economic impact and the potential life-years gained (LYG) that can be attributed to the extent of next-generation sequencing (NGS) testing in the United States compared with single-gene testing (SGT) in patients with metastatic nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer in the United States., Methods: A model was developed to evaluate incremental rates of SGT or NSG testing on the basis of LYG and cost per LYG. ADOs included for NGS included EGFR , ALK , ROS1 , BRAF , RET , MET , and NTRK . SGT included EGFR and ALK . Assumptions were made for expected incidence of ADOs. Survival distributions were fit to published trial averages of median and 5-year overall survival. Treatment costs were estimated from drug cost averages. Reimbursement costs were based on data from the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services., Results: Each incremental 10% increase in NGS testing produces an average of 2,627.4 additional LYG, with an average cost savings per LYG of $75 US dollars (USD). Replacing SGT at the current rate of 80% with NGS testing would result in an average additional 21,09.6 LYG and reduce cost per LYG by an average of $599 USD. If 100% of eligible patients were tested with NGS and each identified patient had matched treatment, the total average cost per LYG would be $16,641.57 USD., Conclusion: On the basis of current evidence, population-level simulations demonstrate that clinically relevant gains in survival with non-negligible reduction in costs are obtainable from widespread adoption of NGS testing and appropriate treatment matching for patients with advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer.

Targeted therapy has stepped into the perioperative treatment arena and launched a radical revolution in the treatment of early-stage oncogene-driven non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). A series of practice-changing clinical trials has enriched the therapeutic perspectives of potentially curable NSCLC. While the CTONG1104 trial took the first step in investigating the adjuvant gefitinib - a first-generation epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI), for the treatment of resected EGFR-mutated NSCLC - the subsequent ADAURA study marked adjuvant osimertinib as the standard of care for resected EGFR-mutant NSCLC. Other targeted agents matched for ALK, ROS1, NTRK, BRAF V600, and RET molecular alterations are also currently being evaluated in the adjuvant and neoadjuvant settings, and there is an urgent need to study biomarker selection, optimal duration, and paradigm making. All these efforts are intended to hit the same target, which is to treat patients on a more personalized level. We review herein the recent major breakthroughs in perioperative targeted therapy for oncogene-driven NSCLC, focusing especially on data from published clinical trials. We discuss challenges from surgical, pathological, and oncological perspectives, and provide recommended strategies for the clinical management of early-stage NSCLC patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Professor Yi-Long Wu reports consulting and advisory services and declares speaker fees for Roche, AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly, Boehringer Ingelheim, Sanofi, MSD and BMS. All other authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Therapeutic landscape of lung cancer has undergone a dramatic shift due to the better understandings of disease biology and the identification of oncogenic driver alterations. Consequently, the new classification paradigm of non-small-cell lung cancer is further characterized by molecularly defined subsets, and making the therapeutic landscape increasingly complex. Driver gene mutations have been found in approximately 75% of Japanese non-squamous, non-small-cell lung cancers. Among these, the gene mutations for which molecularly-targeted therapies are being developed include EGFR mutations, ALK fusion gene, ROS1 fusion gene, BRAF V600E mutation, MET exon 14 skipping mutation, KRAS G12C mutation, RET fusion gene, and NTRK fusion gene. When limited to fusion genes, as of June 2022, crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, and lorlatinib are approved for the ALK fusion gene; crizotinib and entrectinib for the ROS1 fusion gene; selpercatinib for the RET fusion gene; entrectinib and larotrectinib for the NTRK fusion gene have been approved in Japan. This article summarizes the therapeutic development of each fusion gene mutation, as well as the therapeutic outcomes and adverse events of the approved drugs.

Background: Lung cancer is the second most common cancer and leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide. Recent advances in molecular testing and targeted therapy have improved survival among patients with metastatic non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We sought to quantify and describe molecular testing among metastatic non-squamous NSCLC cases in selected Southeast Asian countries and describe first-line therapy chosen., Patients and Methods: A retrospective study was conducted based on incident lung cancer cases diagnosed between 2017 and 2019 in Lampang (Thailand), Penang (Malaysia), Singapore and Yogyakarta (Indonesia). Cases (n = 3413) were defined using the International Classification of Diseases for Oncology third edition. In Singapore, a clinical series obtained from the National Cancer Centre was used to identify patients, while corresponding population-based cancer registries were used elsewhere. Tumor and clinical information were abstracted by chart review according to a predefined study protocol. Molecular testing of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) gene rearrangement, ROS1 gene rearrangement and BRAF V600 mutation was recorded., Results: Among 2962 cases with a specified pathological diagnosis (86.8%), most patients had non-squamous NSCLC (75.8%). For cases with staging information (92.1%), the majority presented with metastatic disease (71.3%). Overall, molecular testing rates in the 1528 patients with stage IV non-squamous NSCLC were 67.0% for EGFR, 42.3% for ALK, 39.1% for ROS1, 7.8% for BRAF and 36.1% for PD-L1. Among these patients, first-line systemic treatment included chemotherapy (25.9%), targeted therapy (35.6%) and immunotherapy (5.9%), with 31% of patients having no record of antitumor treatment. Molecular testing and the proportion of patients receiving treatment were highly heterogenous between the regions., Conclusions: This first analysis of data from a clinically annotated registry for lung cancer from four settings in Southeast Asia has demonstrated the feasibility of integrating clinical data within population-based cancer registries. Our study results identify areas where further development could improve patient access to optimal treatment., Competing Interests: Disclosure RS is involved in advisory boards for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Lily, Merck, Merck Serono, Novartis, Pfizer, Puma, Roche, Taiho, Takeda, Yuhan and has received research grants from AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim. RK has been an advisor/speaker or received honorarium from AstraZeneca, Pfizer, Merck, MSD, BMS, J&J, Ipsen, Eisai, Amgen, Novartis, Lucence Therapeutics and Astellas. NP has consulting or advisory roles with AstraZeneca, Novartis and Roche. SP has consulting/advisory roles with AbbVie, Amgen, Arcus, AstraZeneca, Bayer, Beigene, Biocartis, BioInvent, Blueprint Medicines, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Clovis, Daiichi Sankyo, Debiopharm, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Elsevier, F-Star, Fishawack, Foundation Medicine, Genzyme, Gilead, GSK, Illumina, Imedex, IQVIA, Incyte, iTeos, Janssen, Medscape, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Merck Serono, Merrimack, Novartis, Novocure, Oncology Education, Pharma Mar, Phosplatin Therapeutics, PER, Pfizer, PRIME, Regeneron, RMEI, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi, Seattle Genetics, Takeda and Vaccibody; has talked in organized public events for AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, ecancer, Eli Lilly, Foundation Medicine, Illumina, Imedex, Medscape, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Mirati, Novartis, PER, Pfizer, Prime, Roche/Genentech, RTP, Sanofi and Takeda; has been a principal investigator in trials (institutional financial support for clinical trials) sponsored by Amgen, AstraZeneca, Beigene, Bristol-Myers Squibb, GSK, Merck Sharp and Dohme, and Roche/Genentech. RSt has been an invited speaker for Amgen, AstraZeneca, Blueprint, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Novartis and Roche; has been on advisory boards for AstraZeneca, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, GSK, MSD, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Seattle Genetics and Takeda; has received institutional support (ETOP, IBCSG) from AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Daiichi Sankyo, Celgene, Ipsen, Janssen, Mirati, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre and Roche. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest. Where authors are identified as personnel of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization, the authors alone are responsible for the views expressed in this article, and they do not necessarily represent the decisions, policy, or views of the International Agency for Research on Cancer/World Health Organization., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) is a rare high-grade neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. Little is known about the differences between the pure and combined LCNEC subtypes, and thus we conducted this study to provide more comprehensive insight into LCNEC., Methods: We reviewed 221 patients with pure LCNEC (P-LCNEC) and 120 patients with combined LCNEC (C-LCNEC) who underwent pulmonary surgery in our hospital to compare their clinical features, driven genes' status (EGFR/ALK/ROS1/KRAS/BRAF), and adjuvant chemotherapy regimens. Propensity score matching (PSM) was applied to reduce selection bias., Results: The P-LCNEC group included a higher proportion of males and smokers than the C-LCNEC group. Furthermore, the C-LCNEC group had higher incidences of visceral pleural invasion (VPI), EGFR mutation and ALK rearrangement compared with the P-LCNEC group. Expression of neuroendocrine markers (CD56, CGA, and SYN) and recurrence patterns were not significantly different between the two groups. The P-LCNEC group had better disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) compared with the C-LCNEC group (median DFS: 67.0 vs. 28.1 months, p = 0.021; median OS: 72.0 vs. 45.0 months, p = 0.001), which was further confirmed by the PSM method (p = 0.004 and p < 0.001, respectively). Adjuvant chemotherapy was also an independent factor for DFS and OS. Subgroup analysis found that regardless of whether it was for the entire LCNEC group or the P- and C-LCNEC subtypes, the small cell lung cancer (SCLC) regimens presented with superior survival compared with the non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) regimens., Conclusion: P-LCNEC was associated with more favorable prognosis compared with C-LCNEC. SCLC-based adjuvant chemotherapy was more appropriate for LCNEC patients than NSCLC-based regimens, regardless of whether they were the pure or combined LCNEC subtypes. C-LCNEC patients may be the potential beneficiary of targeted therapy., (© 2022. Society of Surgical Oncology.)

Lorlatinib is a third-generation, brain-penetrant anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and c-ros oncogene 1 (ROS1) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) with robust intracranial activity in patients with ALK- or ROS1-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Data from the ongoing open-label, single-arm, multicenter, phase-1/2 study of lorlatinib in patients with metastatic ALK- or ROS1-positive NSCLC were used to further investigate the potential brain penetration of lorlatinib. Patients received escalating lorlatinib doses (10-200 mg once daily or 35-100 mg twice daily) or the approved dosing (100 mg daily). Plasma was collected from all patients, and cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) was collected at baseline and during the study from 5 patients with suspected or confirmed leptomeningeal carcinomatosis or carcinomatous meningitis. For those 5 patients, lorlatinib concentrations ranged from 2.64 to 125 ng/mL in the CSF and from 12.7 to 457 ng/mL in the plasma; free plasma concentrations ranged from 4.318 to 155.385 ng/mL. The CSF/free plasma ratio was 0.77 (R 2  = 0.96 and P < .001). Using a post-hoc population pharmacokinetic model, the average steady-state unbound plasma concentration of lorlatinib was derived and the CSF concentration was estimated for all patients. Known minimum efficacy concentrations (C eff ) for wild-type and mutated (L1196M and G1202R) ALK were used to derive central nervous system (CNS) C eff . Estimated CNS concentrations exceeded the derived CNS C eff values in all patients for wild-type ALK and the ALK L1196M mutation, and in 35.8% of patients for the ALK G1202R mutation. Projected lorlatinib CNS concentrations were consistent with the high intracranial response rates reported in clinical trials and provide further evidence of the potent CNS penetration of lorlatinib., (© 2022 The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Next-generation sequencing (NGS) has been implemented in clinical oncology for diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic guidance. Among the various NGS applications in molecular oncology, we focused on the following topics: laboratory standards for targeted gene panels (somatic mutations) and therapeutic guidance based on NGS of lung cancer and rare cancers, namely sarcomas and cancers of unknown primary. Multiple quality control checkpoints should be addressed in the pre-analytical phase for good quality and interpretation of the NGS results. It includes tumor size and cellularity, tissue processing and decalcification, tumor fraction, tumor viability, fixatives, and staining. Communication between clinicians and laboratory support is also essential. In lung cancer, all patients with non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer should be tested with a NGS panel, and it should include not only genes with approved targeted therapies (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, MET, NTRK, RET, and ROS1) but also genes with potentially actionable genomic alterations (HER2 and KRAS). Since there is a lack of extensive knowledge regarding the use of NGS in rare tumors performing comprehensive genomic profiling, NGS panels to better manage the disease are recommended. Moreover, other patients with other incurable solid tumors may benefit from being included in biomarker-driven clinical trials. Multidisciplinary tumor boards with the participation of experts with the ability to integrate genomic profiling data are essential to tailor the best strategy for each patient. Considering that there are no national guidelines, this article aims to guide laboratory and clinical practice for the use of NGS in the context of lung cancer, rare tumors, and cancer of unknown primary in Portugal.

Background: Treatment of lung cancer is getting more personalized nowadays and medical practitioners are moving away from conventional histology-driven empirical treatments, platinum-based chemotherapy, and other invasive surgical resections and have started adopting alternate therapies in which therapeutic targets are patient's molecular oncogenic drivers., Aim: The aim of the current study is to extract meaningful information from the online somatic mutation data (retrieved from cBioPortal) of 16 most significantly mutated oncogenes in non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), namely EGFR, NRAS, KRAS, HER2 (ERBB2), RET, MET, ROS1, FGFR1, BRAF, AKT1, MEK1 (MAP2K1), PIK3CA, PTEN, DDR2, LKB1 (STK11) and ALK, for improving our understanding of the pathobiology of the lung cancer that can aid decision-making on critical clinical and therapeutic considerations., Methods: Using an integrated approach comprising 4 steps, the oncogenic potential of 661 missense non-synonymous single nucleotide polymorphisms (nsSNPs) in 16 genes was ascertained using 2059 NSCLC (1575 lung adenocarcinomas, 484 lung squamous cell carcinomas) patients' online mutation data. The steps used comprise sequence/structure homology-based prediction, scoring of conservation of mutated residues and positions, prediction of resulting molecular and functional consequences using machine-learning and structure-guided approach., Results: Out of a total of 661 nsSNPs analyzed, a set of 29 nsSNPs has been identified as conserved high confidence mutations in 10 of 16 genes relevant to the under study. Out of 29 conserved high confidence nsSNPs, 4 nsSNPs (EGFR N1094Y, BRAF M620I, DDR2 R307L, ALK P1350T) have been found to be putative novel rare genetic markers for NSCLC., Conclusions: The current study, the first of its kind, has provided a list of deleterious non-synonymous somatic mutations in a selected pool of oncogenes that can be considered as a promising target for future drug design and therapy for patients with lung adenocarcinomas and squamous cell carcinomas., (Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Cancer patients suffer high risk of venous thromboembolism (VTE). Cancer-associated VTE (CAT) causes hospitalization, morbidity, delayed cancer treatment, and mortality; therefore, exceptional CAT prevention and management are imperative., Methods: This review offers practical recommendations and treatment algorithms for eight complex, clinically relevant situations posing great uncertainty regarding management and requiring an urgent decision: VTE prophylaxis in ambulatory cancer patients with pancreatic pancreas (1) or lung cancer with molecular alterations (2); optimal management of VTE during antineoplastic treatment with antiangiogenics (3) or chemotherapy (4); protracted VTE treatment, determinants; (5) drugs used (6), and optimal VTE management in situations of high bleeding risk (7) or recurrent VTE (8)., Results: With the evidence available, primary thromboprophylaxis in patients with lung cancer harbouring ALK/ROS1 translocations or pancreatic cancer receiving ambulatory chemotherapy must be appraised. If antiangiogenic therapy can yield a clear benefit and the patient recovers from a grade 3 thrombotic event, it can be cautiously re-introduced in selected cases, provided that the person agrees to assume the risk after being duly informed. Anticoagulation maintenance beyond 6 months is recommended in individuals with metastatic tumours, on active treatment, or at high risk for recurrent VTE without bleeding risk. In such cases, LMWH and DOACs are safe, being mindful that the latter could entail a higher risk of bleeding; consequently, they should be used judiciously in more haemorrhagic tumours, such as gastrointestinal cancers. In cases of recurrent VTE, the presence of active cancer, infra-therapeutic dose, and anticoagulant treatment failure must be ruled out. In individuals with platelet counts of 25,000-50,000 and VTE liable to recur who need anticoagulation, full-dose LMWH and transfusion support can be contemplated to reach values of > 50,000. In CAT unlikely to recur, decreasing the LMWH dose by 25-50% is recommended. Renal impairment associated with thrombosis must be treated with LMWHs; there is no need to adjust the dose in patients with CrCl > 30; with CrCl = 15-30, dose adjustment is advised, and suspended when CrCl is < 15., Conclusion: We provide useful advice for complex, clinically relevant situations that clinicians treating CAT must face devoid of any unequivocal, strong, evidence-based recommendations., (Copyright © 2022 European Federation of Internal Medicine. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The number of targeted drugs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is ever-expanding and requires testing of an increasing number of predictive biomarkers. We present a comprehensive real-world evaluation of molecular testing and treatment selection in stage IV NSCLC patients in the Netherlands from 2017 to 2019., Materials and Methods: Molecular pathology reports of NSCLC patients were collected from the Dutch Pathology Registry in time intervals between Oct-2017 and April-2019 (N = 5,038 patients) to study diagnostic yield. Linkage between the Dutch Pathology Registry and the Netherlands Cancer Registry enabled studying molecular testing rates for stage IV NSCLC initially diagnosed in 2017-Q4 (N = 1,193) and application of targeted therapy in stage IV NSCLC patients with potentially druggable alterations reported between Oct-2017 and June-2018 (N = 401)., Results: Predictive molecular testing was performed in 85.0% of adenocarcinomas, 60.4% of NSCLC-not otherwise specified (NOS) and 17.4% of squamous cell carcinomas. Testing rates were highest for EGFR and ALK (adenocarcinoma: 82.7% and 80.7%, respectively). Incidence of molecular driver alterations (i.e. EGFR, KRAS, ALK, ROS1, BRAF, MET, ERBB2, FGFR1) was 61.1% for adenocarcinomas, 42.3% for NSCLC-NOS, and 24.7% for squamous cell carcinomas. Therapeutically relevant alterations were detected at a higher frequency by NGS- versus non-NGS-approaches (adenocarcinoma: 62.4% versus 56.5%, respectively (P = 0.004)) due to a lower failure rate, more comprehensive testing and higher sensitivity. Uptake of treatment with a registered targeted therapy in eligible patients varied per actionable target, i.e. EGFR: 85.8%, ALK: 74.7%, ROS1: 33.7%, BRAF: 51.5%. Treatment with agents in clinical studies/compassionate use was lower, i.e. MET: 22.8%, HER2: 18.9%, RET: 6.7%., Conclusion: Real-world data show NGS-based approaches to be superior to non-NGS. Uptake of molecular testing and the corresponding targeted treatments was less than expected based on guidelines and even more so for trials, off-label use and compassionate use, indicating less than optimal access to rational treatment options., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: The ten-eleven translocation 1 (TET1), which is essential for active DNA demethylation, plays a multifaceted role in the pathogenesis of colorectal cancer. The study has demonstrated the association of TET1 mutations with a high response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in diverse cancers. However, the relationship between TET1 mutations and the response to ICIs in colon cancer is still lacking., Methods: The prognosis, predictive markers, immune characteristics, mutation number of DNA damage repair (DDR) pathways, pathway enrichment, and drug sensitivity conditions were all compared between TET1-mutated and wild-type patients with colon adenocarcinoma (COAD)., Results: The overall survival of patients with TET1 mutations in the ICI-treated cohort was significantly longer than those without (p = 0.0059). Compared with the wild-type patients, TET1-mutated patients had higher tumor mutational burden and neoantigen load, enhanced abundance of tumor-infiltrating immune cells, increased expression of immune-related genes, and mutation number of DDR pathways. Additionally, the patients with TET1 mutations were found to be more sensitive to lapatinib and 5-fluorouracil., Conclusion: These findings suggest that TET1 mutations may serve as a potential biomarker for the response to ICIs in COAD patients., (© 2022. The Author(s).)

Despite the discovery of RAS oncogenes in human tumor DNA 40 years ago, the development of effective targeted therapies directed against RAS has lagged behind those more successful advancements in the field of therapeutic tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting other oncogenes such as EGFR , ALK , and ROS1 . The discoveries that (1) malignant RAS oncogenes differ from their wild-type counterparts by only a single amino acid change and (2) covalent inhibition of the cysteine residue at codon 12 of KRAS G12C in its inactive GDP-bound state resulted in effective inhibition of oncogenic RAS signaling and have catalyzed a dramatic shift in mindset toward KRAS -driven cancers. Although the development of allele-selective KRAS G12C inhibitors has changed a treatment paradigm, the clinical activity of these agents is more modest than tyrosine kinase inhibitors targeting other oncogene-driven cancers. Heterogeneous resistance mechanisms generally result in the restoration of RAS/mitogen-activated protein kinase pathway signaling. Many approaches are being evaluated to overcome this resistance, with many combinatorial clinical trials ongoing. Furthermore, because KRAS G12D and KRAS G12V are more prevalent than KRAS G12C , there remains an unmet need for additional therapeutic strategies for these patients. Thus, our current translational standing could be described as "the end of the beginning," with additional discovery and research innovation needed to address the enormous disease burden imposed by RAS -mutant cancers. Here, we describe the development of KRAS G12C inhibitors, the challenges of resistance to these inhibitors, strategies to mitigate that resistance, and new approaches being taken to address other RAS -mutant cancers.

Objectives: A cost-effectiveness analysis comparing comprehensive genomic profiling (CGP) of 10 oncogenes, targeted gene panel testing (TGPT) of 4 oncogenes, and no tumor profiling over the lifetime for patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma from the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services' perspective was conducted., Methods: A decision analytic model used 10 000 hypothetical Medicare beneficiaries with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma to simulate outcomes associated with CGP (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ERBB2, MET, NTRK1, NTRK2, NTRK3, RET, ROS1), TGPT (ALK, BRAF, EGFR, ROS1), and no tumor profiling (no genes tested). First-line targeted cancer-directed therapies were assigned if actionable gene variants were detected; otherwise, nontargeted cancer-directed therapies were assigned. Model inputs were derived from randomized trials (progression-free survival, adverse events), the Veterans Health Administration and Medicare (drug costs), published studies (nondrug cancer-related management costs, health state utilities), and published databases (actionable variant prevalences). Costs (2019 US$) and quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) were discounted at 3% per year. Probabilistic sensitivity analyses used 1000 Monte Carlo simulations., Results: No tumor profiling was the least costly/person ($122 613 vs $184 063 for TGPT and $188 425 for CGP) and yielded the least QALYs/person (0.53 vs 0.73 for TGPT and 0.74 for CGP). The costs per QALY gained and corresponding 95% confidence interval were $310 735 ($278 323-$347 952) for TGPT vs no tumor profiling and $445 545 ($322 297-$572 084) for CGP vs TGPT. All probabilistic sensitivity analysis simulations for both comparisons surpassed the willingness-to-pay threshold ($150 000 per QALY gained)., Conclusion: Compared with no tumor profiling in patients with metastatic lung adenocarcinoma, tumor profiling (TGPT, CGP) improves quality-adjusted survival but is not cost-effective., (Copyright © 2021 International Society for Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research, Inc. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The treatment landscape of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients has dramatically changed over the past 10 years, particularly thanks to the advent and development of several tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) targeting oncogenic drivers. Among them, patients bearing anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) translocations, which are causative of 3-5% of all advanced NSCLC, have seen dramatically improved their clinical outcomes moving life expectancy at 5 years from less than 5% to 50%. In fact, multiple ALK inhibitors (ALKi) entered in the therapeutic algorithm of ALK+ patients, multiplying their treatment opportunities. Remarkably, in the near future we could take advantage of up to different 6 molecules for the first-line approach (crizotinib, ceritinib, alectinib, brigatinib, plus ensartinib and lorlatinib). Among available ALKi, brigatinib, a second-generation (2G) inhibitor, showed notable activity in this setting, also against central nervous system (CNS) disease, and a good safety profile, supporting its approval as upfront treatment based on the ALTA-1L trial results. With a peculiar profile of enzymatic targets, brigatinib represents a valuable opportunity in the ALK targeting journey, albeit having to balance its safety profile. The abundance of therapeutic options for these patients poses nontrivial questions; in absence of direct comparisons of efficacy is not easy to define the best approach and, more compelling, the correct administration sequence in order to give the best therapeutic chances to ALK+ lung cancer patients. In such wide variety of options, we reviewed the preclinical and clinical efficacy data of brigatinib, its pharmacological and safety profile, like also actual and potential future applications in the ALK+ NSCLC scenario. Through a spurious exercise of an indirect comparison with other available 2G ALKi, we tent to summarize the required knowledge to properly choose the best drug at the right time. Furthermore, we reviewed available data on molecular resistance mechanisms and putative therapeutic applications in other contexts, such as ROS1+ NSCLC patients or EGFR+ ones progressing to osimertinib.

Objectives: The evaluation of an increasing number of diagnostic and predictive markers is playing a central role in precision thoracic oncology. Multiplex immunohistochemistry (mIHC), alongside next-generation sequencing, is ideally situated for this purpose and maximizes tumor tissue preservation for molecular analyses that use increasingly large panels. However, the standardization and validation of mIHC that supports routine clinical laboratory processes are mandatory. After a previous proof-of-concept study, we now (i) optimized two automated four-plex assays on a commercially available IHC autostainer for use in daily practices worldwide and (ii) evaluated the repeatability and concordance of the assessment of the cell density., Patients and Methods: Two four-plex mIHC assays [i) TTF1, p40, PD-L1, CD8; and, ii) ALK, ROS1, BRAFV600E, NTRK] were optimized on the BenchMark ULTRA autostainer (Ventana Medical Systems, Inc.), as determined in comparison to conventional IHC chromogenic assays. Intra-site repeatability was evaluated on serial tumor sections from non-small cell lung carcinomas (NSCLC). The concordance was assessed by linear fit to plots of the percentage staining evaluated on tumor sections from 89 NSCLC patients., Results: Following optimization, an average concordance for a staining rate of 95.4% was achieved between conventional IHC and mIHC across all selected markers. Assessment of intra-site repeatability showed strong concordance for all these markers (average, R 2  = 0.96; P-value < 0.001)., Conclusions: Our optimized mIHC assay gave a sensitive and repeatable assessment of two panels of eight diagnostic and predictive biomarkers for NSCLC. The availability of standardized protocols to determine these biomarkers on a widely available IHC platform will expand the number of pathology laboratories able to determine the eligibility of patients with NSCLC for targeted treatment or immunotherapy in a reliable and concordant manner, thus providing a unique sample-sparing tool to characterize limited tissue samples in thoracic oncology., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Kinase gene fusions are strong driver mutations in neoplasia; however, kinase intergenic-breakpoint rearrangements (IGRs) confound the detection of such fusions and of targeted treatments. We aim to provide an overview of kinase IGRs in a large lung cancer cohort and examine real-world survival outcomes of patients with such fusions., Methods: Mutational profiles analyzed using targeted next-generation sequencing of 425 cancer-related genes between June 2016 and July 2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Patients' demographic data, clinical characteristics, and survivals were analyzed. RNA sequencing or immunohistochemical assays were carried out to verify chimeric fusion products., Results: We identified 3411 patients with kinase fusions from a cohort of 30 450 patients with lung cancer, and 624 kinase IGR events were identified in 538 of the 3411 patients. The most frequently identified kinase genes included anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK), RET proto-oncogene (RET), ROS proto-oncogene 1 (ROS1), Erb-B2 receptor tyrosine kinase 2/3 (ERBB2/3), and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). Our data showed that most (67%) kinase IGRs occurred on the same chromosome and kinase domains remained intact at the 3'-end. Approximately 3% (19/624) of the kinase IGRs had one genomic breakpoint located in gene promoter regions, including nine fusion events involving ALK, RET, ROS1, EGFR, ERBB2, or fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3). Among the 538 patients with kinase IGRs, 167 (31%) lacked oncogenic driver mutations, among which 28 received targeted therapies in real-world practice. Notably, three ALK IGR patients who harbored no canonical oncogenic aberrations were confirmed with an EML4-ALK chimeric fusion product by RNA sequencing and/or ALK immunohistochemical assays. One patient demonstrated a favorable clinical outcome after 14 months on crizotinib. An additional two patients who had ROS1 IGRs demonstrated a clinical benefit after 13 and 19 months on crizotinib, respectively., Conclusion: A large real-world lung cancer cohort with kinase IGRs was comprehensively analyzed for their molecular characteristics. The data indicated the potential oncogenic function of kinase IGRs and their outcomes following the administration of targeted therapies., Competing Interests: Disclosure YM, QO, and XW are employees of Nanjing Geneseeq Technology Inc., Jiangsu, China. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: ROS1-rearranged (ROS1+) non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a rare lung cancer with limited treatment options. Phase I-II studies with ROS1-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) included small numbers of patients and real-world data are lacking. We investigate the efficacy and safety of lorlatinib, a third-generation TKI targeting ALK and ROS1, in patients with ROS1+ NSCLC treated through an expanded access program., Methods: Consecutive patients with advanced ROS1+ NSCLC treated with lorlatinib between October 2015 and June 2019 were included. Data were collected from medical records. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival., Results: Out of the 80 patients included, 47(59%) were female, 49(62%) never smokers (less than 100 cigarettes over the lifetime), and 68(85%) had stage IV NSCLC at diagnosis. Most frequent histology was adenocarcinoma (95%) and median age was 58.2 years. At the time of lorlatinib initiation, 51(64%) patients had brain metastases and 55(81%) were PS 0-1. Lorlatinib was administered as second/third/fourth/fifth+ line in 29%/28%/18%/26% of patients. All patients previously received at least one ROS1 TKI, and 55(69%) previously received chemotherapy. Median follow-up from lorlatinib initiation was 22.2 months. Median progression-free survival and overall survival from lorlatinib initiation were 7.1 months [95% confidence interval (CI) 5.0-9.9 months] and 19.6 months (95% CI 12.3-27.5 months). Median duration of treatment with lorlatinib was 7.4 months (95% CI 6.5-13.1 months). Overall response and disease control rates were 45% and 82%, respectively. The central nervous system response rate was 72%. Treatment was stopped due to toxicity in 10 patients (13%). The safety profile was consistent with previously published data., Conclusions: Lorlatinib is a major treatment option for advanced refractory ROS1+ NSCLC in treatment strategy., Competing Interests: Role of the funder The funding source had no role in the design, data collection, analysis, or interpretation of the study, or in the preparation of this manuscript. Disclosure SB reports non-financial support from Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Roche, Pfizer, personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, grants from Intergroupe Francophone de Cancérologie Thoracique. BB reports grants from Abbvie, Amgen, Aptitude Health, AstraZeneca, BeiGene, Blueprint Medicines, Bristol Myers Squibb (BMS), Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, Cergentis, Cristal Therapeutics, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly, GlaxoSmithKline, Inivata, Janssen, Onxeo, OSE Immunotherapeutics, Pfizer, Roche-Genentech, Sanofi, Takeda, Tolero Pharmaceuticals. DMS reports grants from Pfizer, Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, Merck Sharp & Dohme (MSD), personal fees from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, Lilly, BMS, MSD, Novartis, Amgen, Abbvie, Becton Dickinson, and non-financial support from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD. JC reports personal fees from Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Novartis, AstraZeneca, MSD, BMS, and Boehringer Ingelheim. VW reports honoraria from Roche, AstraZeneca, BMS, MSD and non-financial support from Roche, Pfizer. BR reports grants or contracts from Chugai, consulting fees from BMS, AstraZeneca, Roche, support for attending meetings and/or travel from BMS, Amgen, MSD, Roche. JB reports personal fees for advisory boards and educational symposia from AstraZeneca, Bayer, BMS, MSD, Roche, Daichii, and Servier. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Purpose of Review: The current review presents clinically relevant driver alterations in nonsmall cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and the targeted treatments currently available for clinical use as well as those in clinical trials and advanced stages of drug development., Recent Findings: Mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor, human epidermal growth factor receptor 2, proto-oncogene B-RAF (BRAF), proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1), rearranged during transfection (RET) and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase are rare genetic driver alterations, each present in a small subset of patients with NSCLC. Treatments targeting BRAF, ROS1, RET and neurotrophic tyrosine kinase are approved in Europe, and promising treatments targeting mesenchymal-epithelial transition factor and human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 are available in clinical trials and compassionate use programs. The response rates, duration of response and tolerability observed in trials of targeted drugs in this setting are presented in detail here., Summary: While rare driver alterations are, by definition, rare, their recognition can change the course of NSCLC for those patients affected. Targeted treatments for many rare driver alterations are well tolerated and effective. Screening for molecular changes in advanced NSCLC should include screening for rare drivers, and patients should be directed to clinical trials in setting where treatment of the driver alterations is not otherwise available., (Copyright © 2021 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Pancreatic cancer is the third leading cause of cancer-related deaths in the United States with a 5-year survival less than 5%. Resistance to standard therapy and limited response to immune checkpoint blockade due to the immunosuppressive and stroma-rich microenvironment remain major challenges in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. A key cellular program involved in therapy resistance is epithelial plasticity, which is also associated with invasion, metastasis, and evasion of immune surveillance. The receptor tyrosine kinase AXL is a key driver of tumor cell epithelial plasticity. High expression and activity of AXL is associated with poor prognosis, metastasis, and therapy resistance in multiple types of cancer including pancreatic. Here, we show that an AXL inhibitor (TP-0903), has antitumor and therapy sensitizing effects in preclinical models of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA). We demonstrate that TP-0903 as a single agent or in combination with gemcitabine and/or anti-programmed cell death protein 1 (PD1) antibody has anti-metastatic and anti-tumor effects in PDA tumor bearing mice, leading to increased survival. In addition, gene expression analysis of tumors demonstrated upregulation of pro-inflammatory and immune activation genes in tumors from TP-0903-treated animals compared with the vehicle, indicating pharmacologic inhibition of AXL activation leads to an immunostimulatory microenvironment. This effect was augmented when TP-0903 was combined with gemcitabine and anti-PD1 antibody. These results provide clear rationale for evaluating TP-0903 in the treatment of pancreatic cancer., (©2021 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Lung cancer accounts for approximately 1 in 10 new cancer diagnoses annually and is responsible for the most cancer-associated deaths in Australia. Despite such figures, there is reason for optimism with many practice-changing developments to report for the management of patients with thoracic malignancies over the last few years. We outline such changes, including the emerging role of immunotherapy in the neoadjuvant and adjuvant setting for patients with localised non-small-cell lung cancer, as well as the established standard of consolidation immunotherapy following definitive chemoradiotherapy for those with locally advanced disease. In the metastatic setting, combination chemotherapy-immunotherapy approaches have become the new paradigm for most patients in the absence of a recognised driver mutation. A range of novel targeted therapies now exist and are Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme (PBS)-subsidised for targets such as EGFR, ALK and ROS1, with many others, such as KRAS G12C, NTRK, MET, RET and HER2, also with therapies rapidly being developed. Even among patients with small-cell lung cancer, who account for the worst prognoses and until recently have received a chemotherapy regimen that has remained unchanged in over 20 years, there is a new standard-of-care in combination chemotherapy-immunotherapy. Furthermore, immunotherapy and potentially anti-vascular endothelial growth factor agents now also play a role in mesothelioma treatment. Last, given recent developments in immunotherapy, targeted therapy and combination approaches in the non-small-cell lung cancer space, there is an increasing recognition of the diversity of lived experience for such patients and need for survivorship programmes to acknowledge such nuances., (© 2021 Royal Australasian College of Physicians.)

Background: As a metabolic reprogramming feature, cancer cells derive most of their energy from aerobic glycolysis, while its regulatory mechanisms and therapeutic strategies continue to be illusive., Methods: Integrative analysis of publically available expression profile datasets was used to identify critical transcriptional regulators and their target glycolytic enzymes. The functions and acting mechanisms of transcriptional regulators in cancer cells were investigated by using in vitro and in vivo assays. The Kaplan-Meier curve and log-rank assay were used to conduct the survival study., Results: Salmonella pathogenicity island 1 (SPI1/PU.1), a haematopoietic transcription factor, was identified to facilitate glycolytic process, tumourigenesis, invasiveness, as well as metastasis of colon cancer cells, which was interplayed by tumour-associated neutrophils. Mechanistically, neutrophils delivered SPI1 mRNA via extracellular vesicles, resulting in enhanced SPI1 expression of cancer cells. Through physical interaction with SPI1-related protein (SPIB), SPI1 drove expression of glycolytic genes within cancer cells, which in turn induced polarization of neutrophils via glycolytic metabolite lactate. Depletion of neutrophils or SPIB-SPI1 interaction in cancer cells significantly inhibited glycolytic process, tumourigenesis and aggressiveness. Upregulation of SPI1 or SPIB was found to be associated with poor prognosis in patients suffering from colon cancer., Conclusions: Therapeutic targeting of SPIB/SPI1-facilitated interplay of cancerous cells and neutrophils suppresses aerobic glycolysis and progression of cancer., (© 2021 The Authors. Clinical and Translational Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Shanghai Institute of Clinical Bioinformatics.)

Rationale: Although anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitors are effective treatment options for ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with central nervous system (CNS) metastasis, achieving long-term survival in patients with NSCLC with meningeal carcinomatosis resistant to ALK inhibitors is difficult. Lorlatinib, a third-generation ALK inhibitor, was designed for selective CNS penetration, and exerts potent antitumor activity against tumors resistant to first- and/or second-generation ALK inhibitors. However, there is limited information about the activity of lorlatinib in ALK inhibitor-resistant meningeal carcinomatosis. Here, we report a case of ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma with meningeal carcinomatosis in which lorlatinib was used after resistance to alectinib and brigatinib., Patients Concerns: A 55-year-old woman with no history of smoking presented to our hospital with a swelling on the left neck. Clinical imaging and histopathological examination revealed a tumor of adenocarcinoma histology in the left upper lung with no CNS metastasis., Diagnoses: The patient was diagnosed with ALK-positive lung adenocarcinoma (cT3N3M1b: stage IVA)., Interventions: She received the second-generation ALK inhibitors, alectinib and brigatinib, in the first and second-line settings, respectively. However, she developed meningeal carcinomatosis. Hence, treatment with lorlatinib was initiated in the third-line setting., Outcomes: The symptoms associated with meningeal carcinomatosis, such as disturbance of consciousness and diplopia, improved dramatically. At 8 months from the initiation of lorlatinib, the patient remained well without disease progression., Lessons: Lorlatinib is an effective treatment option for patient with ALK-positive NSCLC who develop meningeal carcinomatosis resistant to second-generation ALK inhibitors. Therefore, lorlatinib should be considered in such cases, even when patients exhibit serious symptoms associated with meningeal carcinomatosis., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interests to disclose., (Copyright © 2021 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Lung cancer is a highly heterogeneous disease often driven by well-characterized driver mutations. Although the best studied are common alterations in the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) oncogenes, rapid advances in molecular characterization has led to the development of novel therapeutics that inhibit additional oncogenic alterations in advanced NSCLC. The literature search identified 62 eligible phase I/II clinical trials or integrated analyses of assessing novel targeted agents against the following molecular alterations: ROS1-rearranged, BRAF V600E-mutant, NTRK-rearranged, MET-altered, uncommon EGFR-mutant, RET-rearranged, HER2-positive, KRAS G12C-mutant and NRG1-rearranged. This rapidly evolving field has produced many new targeted treatment options and promising outcomes have led to the FDA approval of seven novel agents for use in ROS1-rearranged, BRAF V600E-mutant, NTRK-rearranged, MET exon 14 skipping-mutant or RET-rearranged advanced NSCLC. Research continues at a rapid pace, with a number of phase III trials underway to fully evaluate new promising agents under development for improving outcomes in patients with NSCLC harboring distinct molecular subtypes. This review will provide a comprehensive summary of existing data as well as a user-friendly guide on the current status of novel targeted therapy in oncogene-driven advanced NSCLC., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest We declare that we have no financial and personal relationships with other people or organizations that can inappropriately influence our work, there is no professional or other personal interest of any nature or kind in any product, service and/or company that could be construed as influencing the position presented in, or the review of, the manuscript entitled.

Rearrangements in the anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) and proto-oncogene tyrosine-protein kinase ROS (ROS1) genes characterise two distinct molecular subsets of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) tumours. Lorlatinib is a third-generation ALK/ROS1 tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) shown to have systemic and intracranial activity in treatment-naive patients and in those who progressed on first- and second-generation TKIs. Despite being generally well tolerated, lorlatinib has a unique and challenging safety profile that includes hyperlipidaemia and central and peripheral nervous system adverse events (AEs). This article summarises a set of strategies designed to monitor and manage lorlatinib-related AEs that were agreed upon by a multidisciplinary panel of specialists in a meeting held in July 2020. Among the recommendations hereby described, special emphasis was placed on communication: prescribing physicians should inform patients and their families/caregivers about the likelihood and nature of lorlatinib AEs, encouraging them to report any symptoms, while at the same time reassuring them that most events are manageable and resolve spontaneously and have little to no interference with cancer treatment. Importantly, all patients should undergo a set of baseline assessments, including biochemical analysis, evaluation of cardiovascular risk, electrocardiogram (ECG), neurological evaluation and contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging of the brain, which should be repeated regularly during lorlatinib treatment. Supportive medications to treat or relieve lorlatinib AEs were also discussed, as were the conditions requiring specialist consultations and/or adjustments in lorlatinib therapy. The overall goal of this article is to serve as a practical guide for oncologists to systematically and effectively approach lorlatinib AEs., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Purpose of Review: Molecular drivers are increasingly identified as therapeutic targets for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This review focuses on the role of ROS1 inhibitors in treating relapsed/metastatic ROS-1 altered (ROS1+) NSCLC., Recent Findings: Four FDA-approved drugs have significant activity against ROS1+ NSCLC: crizotinib, ciritinib, lorlatinib, and entrectinib. Each drug yields an overall response rates exceeding 60% with ciritinib, lorlatinib, and entrectinib possessing intracranial activity. The drugs have manageable toxicity profiles. ROS1 alterations are rare molecular drivers of NSCLC that can be effectively treated with a variety of ROS1-targetd drugs. New agents are being identified that may treat resistance mutations.

Proteins of the Bcl-2 family are known as regulators of apoptosis, one of the most studied forms of programmed cell death. The Bcl-2 protein family is represented by both pro- and antiapoptotic members. Antiapoptotic proteins are often exploited by tumor cells to avoid their death, thus playing an important role in carcinogenesis and in acquisition of resistance to various therapeutic agents. Therefore, antiapoptotic proteins represent attractive targets for cancer therapy. A detailed investigation of interactions between Bcl-2 family proteins resulted in the development of highly selective inhibitors of individual antiapoptotic members. These agents are currently being actively studied at the preclinical and clinical stages and represent a promising therapeutic strategy, which is highlighted by approval of venetoclax, a selective inhibitor of Bcl-2, for medical use. Meanwhile, inhibition of antiapoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins has significant therapeutic potential that is yet to be revealed. In the coming era of precision medicine, a detailed study of the mechanisms responsible for the sensitivity or resistance of tumor cells to various therapeutic agents, as well as the search for the most effective combinations, is of great importance. Here, we discuss mechanisms of how the Bcl-2 family proteins function, principles of their inhibition by small molecules, success of this approach in cancer therapy, and, eventually, biochemical features that can be exploited to improve the use of Bcl-2 family inhibitors as anticancer drugs.

Our previous study demonstrated that cadmium (Cd) is an effective inducer of mitophagy, which is mainly mediated by PINK1/Parkin pathway. However, the role of other mitophagy pathways in Cd-induced mitophagy remains elusive. The present study employed HeLa cells, lacking fully functional Parkin, as a cell model to study Parkin-independent mitophagy pathway induced by Cd. Our results showed that BCL2/adenovirus E1B 19 kDa protein-interacting protein 3-like (Bnip3L/NIX), an outer mitochondrial membrane mitophagy receptor, could provide an alternate pathway for Cd-induced mitophagy in HeLa cells. Specifically, 10 μM Cd for 12 h induced mitophagy in GM00637 and HeLa cells which was assessed by mitochondrial fusion to lysosomes and decreased expression of mitochondrial markers such as COX-IV and HSP60. Notably, in GM00637 cells, Cd-induced mitophagy was predominantly mediated by PINK1/Parkin pathway as evinced by translocation of Parkin to mitochondria. Interestingly, in HeLa cells, significant increase in NIX expression was occurred and mitophagy was induced under Cd exposure, suggesting NIX compensates lost role of Parkin in Cd-induced mitophagy in HeLa cells. These results were verified by knocking down NIX using siRNA in HeLa cells, which lead to abolished mitophagy process. Moreover, NIX phosphorylation at serine-81 significantly increased in cells treated with Cd implying that phosphorylation of NIX plays an important role in NIX-mediated mitophagy. These findings reveal a novel mechanism of Cd toxicity and suggest a compensatory role of NIX in Cd-induced mitophagy., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare no competing interests., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)