Search

Background/aims: : Bismuth-based quadruple therapy (BQT) is a treatment option for clarithromycin-resistant Helicobacter pylori (HP) infection. The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of 7-day BQT with that of 14-day BQT as first-line treatment for clarithromycin-resistant HP infection., Methods: : A total of 162 treatment-naïve patients with peptic ulcer disease and clarithromycin-resistant HP infection confirmed by real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR) were enrolled. The enrolled patients were prospectively randomized to receive BQT for either 7 or 14 days of treatment. Eradication of HP infection was assessed using a 13 C-urea breath test. Eradication and adverse event rates of the two groups were assessed., Results: : The overall eradication rates in the intention-to-treat (ITT) and per-protocol (PP) analyses were 83.0% (95% confidence interval [CI], 77.2% to 88.9%; 132/159) and 89.8% (95% CI, 84.9% to 94.7%; 132/147), respectively. The eradication rates in the ITT analysis were 79.0% (64/81) in the 7-day group and 87.2% (68/78) in the 14-day group (p=0.170). The eradication rates in the PP analysis were 86.5% (64/74) in the 7-day group and 93.2% (68/73) in the 14-day group (p=0.182). Clinically significant adverse events occurred in 18.2% of patients. There was no statistically significant difference in the rates of individual or all adverse events between the two groups., Conclusions: : Both 7-day and 14-day BQT were effective and safe as first-line therapy for HP infections identified as resistant to clarithromycin by RT-PCR. For clarithromycin-resistant HP infections, 7-day BQT may be sufficient as first-line therapy.

Background: Esomeprazole use is increasing in dogs, but the gastrointestinal adverse events associated with q12h dosing necessitate pharmacodynamic evaluation of a reduced dose and frequency of administration., Objectives: To compare the efficacy of 2 doses of (q24h) esomeprazole in raising intragastric pH in dogs., Animals: Nine healthy, client-owned dogs, >20 kg., Methods: Prospective, randomized, double blinded, crossover study. Esomeprazole (0.5 or 1 mg/kg q24h) was orally administered for up to 5 days per treatment arm, and the mean percentage time intragastric pH was ≥3 (MPT3) and ≥4 (MPT4) for 24 hours periods were compared to pretreatment pH using a continuous pH monitoring system. Dogs failing to reach pH goals (MPT3 ≥75%, MPT4 ≥66%) with once daily dosing received esomeprazole 1 mg/kg PO q12h to determine if a higher dose would improve acid suppression., Results: No significant difference in the MPT3 or MPT4 was identified between treatments for any time point (P > .05). Both doses increased the MPT pH ≥3 and 4 median [range] (0.5 mg/kg, 1 mg/kg) on days 1 (MPT3: 76.8% [44-100], 69.2% [28.2-100]; MPT4: 65.6% [16.7-99.3], 54.9% [14.9-93.3]; P = .0009) and 2 (MPT3:77.2% [27.4-100], 75.4% [49.4-89.5]; MPT4: 66.3% [15.5-100], 59.7% [33.8-81.2]; P = .0005) of PPI treatment compared to pretreatment (MPT3: 58.3% [0.02-93.9], 52.6% [6.1-94.7]; MPT4: 25.2% [0-86.8], 32.4% [1.8-89.3]). Six dogs (66%, [0.36, 0.97]) reached pH goals established in humans with q24h dosing., Conclusions and Clinical Importance: Both q24h PO esomeprazole doses were effective in raising intragastric pH, despite high intersubject variability, but 33% of dogs required q12h dosing to reach pH goals., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Veterinary Internal Medicine published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.)

Abstract: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used for a number of gastric-acid related diseases. Although these agents demonstrate enhanced efficacy and tolerability compared with other acid-suppressive therapies, long-term use is associated with a number of adverse reactions. This article summarizes appropriate indications for short- and long-term use of PPIs and describes deprescribing strategies that clinicians can use to reduce unnecessary PPI use in their patients., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Physician Associates.)

Introduction: The concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) potentially increases the risk of acute kidney injury (AKI). However, the risk of AKI has not been comprehensively assessed for the concomitant use of NSAIDs with gastroprotective agents such as misoprostol and PPIs. The objective of this study was to evaluate whether the use of various gastroprotective agents affects the risk of AKI in patients receiving NSAIDs., Methods: The data analyzed were obtained from the JMDC hospital-based administrative claims database between April 2014 and August 2022. Histamine-2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs) were compared with PPIs or misoprostol in patients receiving NSAIDs. The primary outcome was the incidence of AKI. The covariates considered were age and sex, admission to intensive care unit, presence of comorbidities based on the modified Charlson Comorbidity Index, and use of renin-angiotensin system inhibitors, loop diuretics, other diuretics, and lithium. AKI was identified by changes in serum creatinine. The distribution of AKI was analyzed using the log-rank test, and estimates of the incidence of AKI were compared among the groups using a Cox proportional hazards model with time-varying variables. Models were adjusted using a doubly robust method that accounts for the inverse probability of treatment weighting at baseline while adjusting for covariates., Results: After screening, 11,688 patients were eligible for inclusion (1729 for H2RAs, 368 for misoprostol, and 9591 for PPIs). AKI occurred in 0.5% of H2RA recipients and 1.1% of PPI recipients; no AKI was observed in the misoprostol group. Compared with H2RAs, the risk of AKI tended to be higher with PPIs (adjusted hazard ratio 1.83, 95% confidence interval 0.92-3.63, p = 0.08)., Conclusion: Compared with H2RAs, PPIs may increase the risk of AKI in patients receiving NSAIDs, although no statistically significant difference was observed. Further research is required to assess the risk trade-off with consideration of both peptic ulcer prevention and the increased risk of AKI in patients concurrently treated with NSAIDs and H2RAs, misoprostol, or PPIs., (© 2024 The Author(s). Pharmacotherapy: The Journal of Human Pharmacology and Drug Therapy published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of Pharmacotherapy Publications, Inc.)

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) rank among the most frequently prescribed medications to treat acid-related diseases. Mounting concerns surround the potential for serious adverse events, including cardiovascular events, associated with their prolonged use/misuse., Areas Covered: This comprehensive review explores cardiovascular adverse events linked to PPI use among high-risk cardiovascular patients. A structured search was conducted on PubMed., Expert Opinion: Many patients with cardiovascular disease who require antiplatelet treatment will require long-term PPI treatment. Interpreting the published data is not straightforward. First, because there is no plausible mechanistic explanation for PPIs to induce cardiovascular events apart from the potential interaction with the metabolism of thienopyridines. Although several observational studies have shown an increased cardiovascular risk and mortality in patients taking long-term PPIs, most available clinical trials and meta-analyses of available studies do not. However, the absence of firm evidence of this link does not necessarily imply that this association does not exist, and other hypothesis must be explored. Anemia is a common event in patients who take antiplatelet therapy and PPIs, and it is a factor associated with cardiovascular events and death. Anemia in these patients is often attributed to erosive lesions of the small intestine, where PPI may play a key role by modifying the microbiota.

Background: Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ), prevalent in developing regions, is a key factor in gastrointestinal diseases. Despite the common use of bismuth-based quadruple therapy, its drawbacks have prompted the search for alternatives. Recently, vonoprazan, a novel acid suppressant, has shown promise in combination with antibiotics as a dual therapy for H. pylori eradication. This study aimed to assess the therapeutic outcomes and adverse events of vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy compared to quadruple therapy., Methods: A randomized controlled trial (RCT) enrolled H. pylori -infected patients at Zhejiang Hospital. Participants were randomly assigned to dual and quadruple therapy groups. The primary endpoints were H. pylori eradication and adverse events., Results: Of the 400 patients studied from April 2022 to June 2023, In the intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis, the eradication rates of H. pylori in vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy group and quadruple therapy group were 94.0% and 87.0%, respectively, p  = 0.017. In the per-protocol (PP) analysis were 97.9% and 93.0%, p  = 0.022. Additionally, the dual therapy group had a significantly lower incidence of adverse events (19%) compared to the quadruple therapy group (53%) ( p  < 0.001)., Conclusion: Vonoprazan-amoxicillin dual therapy demonstrates superior eradication efficacy and reduced adverse events compared to quadruple therapy in H. pylori -infected patients, suggesting its potential for clinical application and promotion.

Introduction: Keverprazan is a novel potassium-competitive acid blocker. The advantages of keverprazan as a potent acid suppressor in Helicobacter pylori eradication have not yet been demonstrated. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of keverprazan as a component of bismuth quadruple therapy in H. pylori treatment., Methods: Adult patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled and randomised to take keverprazan (KEV group)- or esomeprazole (ESO group)-quadruple therapy. The regimens contained keverprazan 20 mg or esomeprazole 20 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg and bismuth potassium citrate 240 mg and were administered twice daily for 14 days. The primary endpoint was the H. pylori eradication rate at 4 weeks after treatment., Results: The full analysis set showed that the H. pylori eradication rates were 87.8% (252/287) and 82.52% (236/286) for the KEV and ESO groups, respectively (difference: 5.29%; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.55-11.18). Keverprazan was superior to esomeprazole in terms of eradication rate in the per protocol set (P=0.0382). The eradication rates for patients resistant or non-resistant to clarithromycin were both numerically higher in the KEV group than the ESO group (83.45% vs. 76.98% for clarithromycin-resistance; 92.31% vs. 88.16% for clarithromycin-non-resistance). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the KEV and ESO groups (76.31% vs. 77.62%), with most adverse events (>90%) being mild in severity. No TEAEs led to death in either group., Conclusions: Keverprazan 20 mg twice daily, used as a component of bismuth quadruple therapy, provided effective H. pylori eradication and was non-inferior to an esomeprazole-based regimen., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Description: The purpose of this American Gastroenterological Association (AGA) Institute Clinical Practice Update (CPU) is to summarize the available evidence and offer expert Best Practice Advice on the integration of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) in the clinical management of foregut disorders, specifically including gastroesophageal reflux disease, Helicobacter pylori infection, and peptic ulcer disease., Methods: This expert review was commissioned and approved by the AGA Institute Governing Board and CPU Committee to provide timely guidance on a topic of high clinical importance to the AGA membership. This CPU expert review underwent internal peer review by the CPU Committee and external peer review through the standard procedures of Gastroenterology. These Best Practice Advice statements were developed based on review of the published literature and expert consensus opinion. Because formal systematic reviews were not performed, these Best Practice Advice statements do not carry formal ratings of the quality of evidence or strength of the presented considerations. Best Practice Advice Statements BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 1: Based on nonclinical factors (including cost, greater obstacles to obtaining medication, and fewer long-term safety data), clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as initial therapy for acid-related conditions in which clinical superiority has not been shown. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 2: Based on current costs in the United States, even modest clinical superiority of P-CABs over double-dose proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may not make P-CABs cost-effective as first-line therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 3: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy for patients with uninvestigated heartburn symptoms or nonerosive reflux disease. Clinicians may use P-CABs in selected patients with documented acid-related reflux who fail therapy with twice-daily PPIs. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 4: Although there is currently insufficient evidence for clinicians to use P-CABs as first-line on-demand therapy for patients with heartburn symptoms who have previously responded to antisecretory therapy, their rapid onset of acid inhibition raises the possibility of their utility in this population. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 5: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy in patients with milder erosive esophagitis (EE) (Los Angeles classification of erosive esophagitis grade A/B EE). Clinicians may use P-CABs in selected patients with documented acid-related reflux who fail therapy with twice-daily PPIs. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 6: Clinicians may use P-CABs as a therapeutic option for the healing and maintenance of healing in patients with more severe EE (Los Angeles classification of erosive esophagitis grade C/D EE). However, given the markedly higher costs of the P-CAB presently available in the United States and the lack of randomized comparisons with double-dose PPIs, it is not clear that the benefits in endoscopic outcomes over standard-dose PPIs justify the routine use of P-CABs as first-line therapy. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 7: Clinicians should use P-CABs in place of PPIs in eradication regimens for most patients with H pylori infection. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 8: Clinicians should generally not use P-CABs as first-line therapy in the treatment or prophylaxis of peptic ulcer disease. BEST PRACTICE ADVICE 9: Although there is currently insufficient evidence for clinicians to use P-CABs as first-line therapy in patients with bleeding gastroduodenal ulcers and high-risk stigmata, their rapid and potent acid inhibition raises the possibility of their utility in this population., (Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background: Vonoprazan is a new acid-suppressing drug that provides an additional choice for eradicating Helicobacter pylori. The effectiveness and safety of vonoprazan and high-dose amoxicillin (VHA) dual therapy requires study in a systematic analysis., Materials and Methods: A comprehensive search of the literature from the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases was conducted up to 16 May 2024. Trials comparing H. pylori eradication rates, adverse events, and compliance of VHA dual therapy with that of other therapies were included. RevMan 5.4 was used for statistical analysis., Results: Eleven randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and two retrospective clinical studies with 4570 samples were included. VHA dual therapy had superior H. pylori eradication rates (intention-to-treat [ITT]: 86.0% vs. 80.7%; odds ratio [OR]=1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.07-1.73; P=0.01; per-protocol [PP]: 90.6% vs. 85.7%; OR=1.42; 95% CI 1.07-1.88; P=0.02), fewer adverse events (15.4% vs. 27.7%; OR=0.49; 95% CI 0.35-0.68, P<0.0001), and similar compliance (94.6% vs. 93.2%; OR=1.27; 95% CI 0.98-1.64; P=0.07) compared with other guideline therapies. According to subgroup analysis with PP data, VHA dual therapy is more effective than bismuth quadruple therapy based on proton-pump inhibitors (P-BQT) (93.5% vs. 89.3%; OR=1.76; 95% CI 1.03-3.00; P=0.04). In addition, the eradication rates for 7-day, 10-day and 14-day VHA dual therapy were 65% (95% CI 0.55-0.75), 92% (95% CI 0.91-0.94) and 93% (95% CI 0.90-0.97), respectively., Conclusion: VHA dual therapy for 10 or 14 days showed superior efficacy and safety compared with therapies recommended by the guidelines and should be prioritised for adoption., Competing Interests: Declarations Funding: This work was supported by grants from Shaanxi Health Scientific Research Innovation Team Project (No. 2024TD-06) and Shaanxi Key Research & Development Project (No. 2023-ZDLSF-35). Competing Interests: None. Ethical Approval: Not required. Sequence Information: Not applicable., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Gastric cancer (GC) is one of the most lethal malignancies worldwide. Helicobacter pylori is the primary cause of GC; therefore, its eradication reduces the risk of developing this neoplasia. There is extensive evidence regarding quadruple therapy with relevance to the European population. However, in Latin America, data are scarce. Furthermore, there is limited information about the eradication rates achieved by antibiotic schemes in European and Latin American populations., Objective: To compare the effectiveness of standard triple therapy (STT), quadruple concomitant therapy (QCT), and bismuth quadruple therapy (QBT) in six centers in Europe and Latin America., Methods: A retrospective study was carried out based on the LEGACy registry from 2017 to 2022. Data from adult patients recruited in Portugal, Spain, Chile, Mexico, and Paraguay with confirmed H. pylori infection who received eradication therapy and confirmatory tests at least 1 month apart were included. Treatment success by each scheme was compared using a mixed multilevel Poisson regression, adjusting for patient sex and age, together with country-specific variables, including prevalence of H. pylori antibiotic resistance (clarithromycin, metronidazole, and amoxicillin), and CYP2C19 polymorphisms., Results: 772 patients were incorporated (64.64% females; mean age of 52.93 years). The total H. pylori eradication rates were 75.20% (255/339) with STT, 88.70% (159/178) with QCT, and 91.30% (191/209) with QBT. Both quadruple therapies (QCT-QBT) showed significantly higher eradication rates compared with STT, with an adjusted incidence risk ratio (IRR) of 1.25 (p: <0.05); and 1.24 (p: <0.05), respectively. The antibiotic-resistance prevalence by country, but not the prevalence of CYP2C19 polymorphism, showed a statistically significant impact on eradication success., Conclusions: Both QCT and QBT are superior to STT for H. pylori eradication when adjusted for country-specific antibiotic resistance and CYP2C19 polymorphism in a sample of individuals residing in five countries within two continents., (© 2024 The Author(s). United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are reported to decrease the efficacy of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), but there are few reports on the association between ICI efficacy and antacids other than PPIs, and simultaneous examination of the effects of antacids, corticosteroids, and non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) on ICI therapy., Methods: We conducted a retrospective study of 381 patients with non-small cell lung cancer who received ICI therapy from January 1, 2016 to December 31, 2022. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) and the secondary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS). Antacids included histamine type 2 receptor antagonists (H2RAs), PPIs, and potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs)., Results: Antacids were administered to 218 patients, including 168 with PPIs, 37 with P-CABs, and 13 with H2RAs. Patients with antacids had worse median PFS and OS than those without antacids (PFS, 2.9 vs. 6.2 months; OS, 12.3 vs. 24.0 months), and those with PPIs, P-CABs, or H2RAs had similar results. However, there were no significant differences between patients with and without antacids when stratified by corticosteroid and NSAID use. Multivariate analyses showed that corticosteroids and NSAIDs administered for cancer-associated symptoms were related to poor prognosis, but antacids including PPIs, P-CABs, or H2RAs were not related., Conclusions: Antacids were not related to ICI efficacy when NSAIDs or corticosteroids were taken into consideration. This may be because the most frequent reason for administering NSAIDs and corticosteroids was cancer-associated symptoms, which are a poor prognostic factor, and most of the patients treated with these medications also received antacids., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors have no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Japanese Respiratory Society. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) reportedly reduce upper gastrointestinal bleeding (UGIB) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). However, whether the benefits of PPIs differ in high-risk subgroups is unknown., Methods and Results: Among 24,563 patients undergoing first PCI in the CREDO-Kyoto registry Cohort-2 and -3, we evaluated long-term effects of PPI for UGIB, defined as GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding, in several potential high-risk subgroups. In the study population, 45.6% of patients were prescribed PPIs. Over a median 5.6-year follow-up, PPIs were associated with lower adjusted risk of UGIB (hazard ratio [HR] 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.50-0.80; P<0.001) and a non-significant but numerically lower risk of any gastrointestinal bleeding (HR 0.84; 95% CI 0.71-1.01; P=0.06). PPIs were not associated with a lower risk of GUSTO moderate/severe bleeding (HR 1.04; 95% CI 0.94-1.15; P=0.40) or a higher adjusted risk of myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke (HR 1.00; 95% CI 0.90-1.12; P=0.97), but were associated with higher adjusted mortality risk (HR 1.18; 95% CI 1.09-1.27; P<0.001). The effects of PPIs for UGIB, myocardial infarction or ischemic stroke, and all-cause death were consistent regardless of age, sex, acute coronary syndrome, high bleeding risk, oral anticoagulant use, and type of P2Y 12 inhibitor., Conclusions: PPIs were associated with a lower risk of UGIB and a neutral risk of ischemic events regardless of high-risk subgroup.

It is common to routinely prescribe gastric ulcer prophylaxis with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) when administering high-dose glucocorticoids (GC) (> 30 mg/day of prednisone equivalent) or during prolonged time (> 15 days). This routine is due to a risk profile considered safe for PPIs in comparison to the possible severe consequences of developing a gastric ulcer. Given the numerous adverse effects associated with PPIs, it is preferable to question the risk-benefit balance when prescribing them. The objective of this article is to summarize the evidence for gastric ulcer prophylaxis with PPI in the event of GC treatment, in an outpatient medical setting or in acute care (excluding intensive care)., Competing Interests: les auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Background: Helicobacter pylori ( H. pylori ) eradication rates have declined with the rise of antibiotic-resistant strains in recent years. Although highly effective with a low prevalence of resistance, standard dose tetracycline is associated with frequent adverse events. The efficacy and safety of low-dose tetracycline as part of tetracycline and amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy are not well described., Aim: To compare the efficacy and safety of low-dose compared to standard dose tetracycline with combined amoxicillin-containing bismuth quadruple therapy in patients with H. pylori infection., Methods: Consecutive patients with H. pylori infection receiving tetracycline, amoxicillin, proton pump inhibitor, and bismuth for 14 days at Sir Run Run Shaw Hospital (1/2022-6/2023) were evaluated. The low-dose tetracycline group received tetracycline 500 mg twice daily (bid) while the standard dose group received 750 mg bid or 500 mg three times daily (tid). Primary endpoints were H. pylori eradication rate and treatment-related adverse events., Results: The mean age of the 218 patients was 48.7 ± 14.0 years, 120 (55%) were male, and 118 (54.1%) received treatment as primary therapy. Furthermore, 73 (33%) patients received low-dose tetracycline (500 mg bid) and 145 (67%) received standard dose tetracycline including 500 mg tid in 74 (33%) and 750 mg bid in 71 (33%). On intention-to-treat analysis, H. pylori eradication rates were 89% [95% confidence interval (CI): 82%-96%] in the 500 mg bid group, 82% (95%CI: 74%-91%) in the 500 mg tid group, and 79% (95%CI: 69%-89%) in the 750 mg bid group without a statistically significant difference ( P = 0.25). The incidence of adverse events was lower in the low-dose compared to the standard dose group (12.3% vs 31.1% or 23.9%; P = 0.02)., Conclusion: Low-dose tetracycline combined with amoxicillin quadruple therapy for 14 days achieved a high eradication rate and fewer adverse events compared to the standard dose tetracycline regimen in patients with H. pylori infection., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: All the authors report no relevant conflicts of interest for this article., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Vonoprazan (VPZ) has been shown to have superior acid-inhibitory effects compared to proton pump inhibitors (PPIs). However, there is a paucity of research examining the efficacy of vonoprazan-based bismuth quadruple therapy (VBQT) in the eradication of primary Helicobacter pylori infection. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of VBQT as a first-line treatment for H pylori eradication. This retrospective, real-world, single-arm study included consecutive treatment-naive patients who received VBQT (VPZ 20 mg, amoxicillin 1000 mg, clarithromycin 500 mg, bismuth potassium citrate 220 mg, all administered twice daily for 14 days) for H pylori eradication between March 1, 2021, and May 30, 2023. The study included both outpatients and inpatients. Eradication rates were assessed using 13C-urea breath tests or 14C-urea breath tests performed 4 to 6 weeks after treatment. The primary outcomes included eradication rates, adverse events, and treatment compliance. A total of 612 H pylori-infected patients were included in the study. The intention-to-treat (ITT), modified ITT (MITT), and per-protocol analyses showed H pylori eradication rates of 84.3% (95% CI: 812% to 87.1%), 95.9% (95% CI: 93.9% to 97.4%), and 96.4% (95% CI: 94.4% to 97.8%), respectively. In the ITT analysis, the adverse event rate was 12.7%, and the treatment compliance rate was 96.9%. In real-world practice, the VBQT regimen demonstrates excellent efficacy and favorable tolerability as a first-line therapy for H pylori eradication., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs), which inhibit gastric acid secretion, are frequently prescribed to patients with Parkinson's disease (PD). Levodopa, the gold-standard treatment for PD, demonstrates enhanced solubility in acidic environments. Although PPIs increase gastric pH and may affect levodopa absorption, the effect of concomitant PPI use on levodopa pharmacokinetics in patients with PD remains unknown. This study aimed to investigate the effect of the concomitant use of esomeprazole, a PPI, on the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and carbidopa and clinical symptoms in patients with PD., Methods: We prospectively enrolled 40 patients with PD and compared the pharmacokinetics of levodopa and carbidopa and clinical symptoms before and two weeks after the concomitant use of esomeprazole., Results: The plasma concentrations of levodopa 30 min after concomitant oral administration of levodopa and esomeprazole were significantly lower (4.92 ± 4.10 μmol/L) than those without concomitant esomeprazole use (6.26 ± 3.75 μmol/L; p = 0.027). The plasma concentrations of carbidopa showed no significant differences with respect to concomitant esomeprazole use. Significant elevation was recorded in all subscores of the Movement Disorder Society-sponsored revision of the Unified Parkinson's disease Rating Scale scores after concomitant use of esomeprazole. No significant differences were observed between Helicobacter pylori-negative and Helicobacter pylori-positive patients. Non-elderly patients (age ≤ 70 years) tended to be more susceptible to the effect of esomeprazole on levodopa pharmacokinetics and clinical symptoms., Conclusions: The unnecessary use of PPIs should be avoided in patients with PD, especially in non-elderly patients, to improve absorption of levodopa., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: This systematic review evaluated the available evidence on the effects of proton pump inhibitors during pregnancy on preeclampsia and related maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes., Data Sources: Five electronic databases (MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Global Medicus Index) were searched on November 17, 2023., Study Eligibility Criteria: Randomized controlled trials of pregnant women who used any class or dose of proton pump inhibitor were eligible., Methods: A meta-analysis was conducted for all outcomes of interest using random-effects models. Results were presented as risk ratios or mean difference. Quality assessment was performed using the Risk of Bias 2 tool, and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations assessment was completed to evaluate the certainty of the evidence. The study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews under identifier CRD42023423673., Results: Our search identified 3879 records that were screened independently by 2 authors. Nine reports (describing 8 trials) met our eligibility criteria, however, 6 trials were ultimately excluded from our analysis because women were only given proton pump inhibitors immediately before cesarean delivery for acid aspiration prevention. The 2 trials that were included in the meta-analysis evaluated the treatment of 177 women with diagnosed preeclampsia. For the primary outcomes, moderate-certainty evidence showed that the use of proton pump inhibitors likely has no effect on the risk for hemolysis, elevated liver enzymes, and low platelet count syndrome (risk ratio, 1.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.37-3.99; I²=0%) or perinatal mortality (risk ratio, 0.81; 95% confidence interval, 0.36-1.79; I²=0%), and there were insufficient data to conduct a meta-analysis on all other primary outcomes, including eclampsia and neonatal mortality. No trials investigated the use of proton pump inhibitors for the prevention of preeclampsia., Conclusion: Given the limited outcome data, we are uncertain about the effect of proton pump inhibitors on women with preeclampsia. Further trials are required to determine what (if any) effects proton pump inhibitors might have for preeclampsia prevention or treatment., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Anaprazole is a proton pump inhibitor. This study aims to elucidate absorption, metabolism, and excretion pathways of anaprazole sodium in the human body. A total of 4 healthy Chinese male subjects were administered a single oral dose of 20 mg/100 µCi of [ 14 C]-anaprazole sodium enteric-coated capsules. The whole blood, plasma, and excreta were analyzed for a total radioactivity (TRA) and metabolite profile. The cumulative radioactivity excretion rate was 93.2%, with 53.3% and 39.9% of the radioactive dose excreted in urine and feces, respectively, and 91.6% of dose recovered within 96 hours after dosing. The parent drug, anaprazole, showed good absorption and was extensively metabolized majorly to thioether M8-1 via nonenzymatic metabolism. Overall, 35 metabolites were identified in plasma, urine, and fecal samples. Anaprazole was the most abundant component in plasma followed by the thioether M8-1, accounting for 28.3% and 16.6%, respectively, of the plasma TRA. Thioether carboxylic acid XZP-3409 (26.3% of urine TRA) and XZP-3409 oxidation and dehydrogenation product M417a (15.1% of fecal TRA) were the major metabolites present in urine and feces, respectively. Anaprazole was undetectable in urine, while fecal samples showed traces (0.07% dose). Blood/plasma ratios of the radioactivity (approximately 0.60) remained consistent over time. Anaprazole showed good absorption and was extensively metabolized majorly to thioether M8-1 via nonenzymatic metabolism, and cytochrome P450 3A4 also contributed to its metabolism in healthy individuals., (© 2024, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Background and Aim: The association between long-term proton-pump inhibitors (PPIs) use and malignancies had long been discussed, but it still lacks consensus. Our study investigated the association between PPI use and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) recurrence following curative surgery., Methods: We retrospectively enrolled 6037 patients with HCC who underwent hepatectomy. Patients were divided into four groups according to their PPI usage. (non-users: < 28 cumulative defined daily dose [cDDD]; short-term users: 28-89 cDDD; mid-term users: 90-179 cDDD, and long-term users: ≥ 180 cDDD, respectively). Recurrence-free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) were analyzed using Kaplan-Meier method and Cox proportional hazard models., Results: Among the 6037 HCC patients, 2043 (33.84%) were PPI users. PPI users demonstrated better median RFS (3.10 years, interquartile range [IQR] 1.49-5.01) compared with non-users (2.73 years, IQR 1.20-4.74; with an adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] of 0.57, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.44-0.74, P < 0.001). When considering the cumulative dosage of PPI, only long-term PPI users had significant lower risk of HCC recurrence than non-PPI group (adj-HR: 0.50; 95% CI: 0.35-0.70; P < 0.001). Moreover, the impact of long-term PPIs use on improving RFS was significant in most of the subgroup analysis, except in patients with advanced tumor stages, with non-cirrhosis, or with a history of chronic kidney disease. However, there were no significant differences in median OS between PPI users and non-users (4.23 years, IQR 2.73-5.86 vs 4.04 years, IQR 2.51-5.82, P = 0.369)., Conclusion: Long-term PPI use (≥ 180 cDDD) may be associated with a better RFS in HCC patients after hepatectomy., (© 2024 Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Introduction: The administration of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) is a common practice to reduce gastro-esophageal adverse events associated with drug treatments but may impair absorption and exposure to oncology drugs. This study investigated the effect of concomitant administration of PPIs and pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib on survival of patients with metastatic clear cell renal carcinoma (mRCC)., Patients and Methods: Total 451 patients receiving pazopanib, sunitinib and cabozantinib as first line treatment were enrolled in this retrospective study. Patients were defined as "no concomitant PPIs (PPI-)" if no PPIs were administered during TKIs, and as "concomitant PPIs (PPI+)" if the administration of PPIs was at least 75% of the time during which TKIs were given., Results: Eighty patients administered pazopanib were PPI- and 86 PPI+; no difference in PFS was observed (10.7 vs. 11.9 months, P = .79). If patients were stratified as short (n = 89) and long (n = 77) responders, there was a significant difference in terms of PFS in PPI+ (n = 47) versus PPI- (n = 30) in long responders, being 24.7 versus 38 months (P = .04), respectively. In the sunitinib cohort, no significant difference of PFS in PPI+ (n = 102) versus PPI- (n = 131) was found, being 11.3 versus 18.1 months, respectively (P=0.15). In the cabozantinib cohort, there was a statistically significant difference in PFS of PPI+ versus PPI- (6 months vs. not reached, P = .04). No correlation with adverse events was found., Conclusions: This study demonstrates an association between PPIs and impaired PFS in mRCC patients given pazopanib and cabozantinib and recommends caution on their concomitant use., Competing Interests: Disclosure CP acted as a consultant and/or a speaker for Angelini Pharma, Biorek, BMS, Eisai, General Electric, Ipsen, Medendi, and MSD, and as a protocol steering committee member for BMS, Eisai, and MSD. MR received honoraria as a speaker/consultant by Astra Zeneca, MSD, BMS, Janssen, Merck and Gilead. MDR received fees from Astellas, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Novartis, Pfizer, Bio-Rad, Janssen, Sanofi-Aventis, Roche, and Ipsen; RD reports receiving speaker bureau/advisor's fee from Ipsen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sanofi Genzyme, AstraZeneca, Janssen, Gilead, Lilly, Gilead, and EUSA Pharma. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Introduction: Tegoprazan (TPZ), a potassium-competitive acid blocker, exerts a strong acid-suppression effect and a rapid onset of action. However, research on TPZ-amoxicillin (TA) dual treatment is limited. Here, we compared the safety and efficacy of TPZ-amoxicillin dual treatment and TPZ, bismuth potassium citrate, amoxicillin, and clarithromycin (TBAC) quadruple therapy in patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection over a 14-day treatment period., Methods: A total of 236 patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori were enrolled in this multicenter, prospective, open-label, and randomized controlled study. Patients randomly received either TA dual or TBAC quadruple therapy. The incidence of adverse reactions and treatment compliance were recorded and then analyzed., Results: The intention-to-treat analysis revealed that H. pylori eradication rates were 83.9% (95% confidence interval 78.2%-91.3%) and 81.4% (95% confidence interval 74.2%-88.5%) for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively, with no statistically significant difference between them ( P = 0.606). The per-protocol analysis revealed that the H. pylori eradication rates were 88.3% and 84.8% for the TA and TBAC groups, respectively ( P = 0.447). The incidence of adverse reactions was significantly lower in the TA group than in the TBAC group (4.2% vs 15.3%, P = 0.004). Moreover, the TA group demonstrated substantially higher treatment compliance than the TBAC group (94.1% vs 89.0%, P = 0.020)., Discussion: The TA dual therapy successfully eradicated H. pylori with a high eradication rate and a low incidence of adverse reactions. Therefore, this treatment is recommended as an alternative course for patients newly diagnosed with H. pylori infection., Competing Interests: CONFLICT OF INTEREST STATEMENT, (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are among the most prescribed drugs. A clinical decision support system (CDSS) could improve their rational use., Aim: The impact of an electronic algorithm (e-algorithm) implemented in a CDSS on potentially missing or inappropriately prescribed PPIs at hospital discharge, its specificity and sensitivity, and the outcome of the alerts issued were analysed., Method: An e-algorithm continuously monitored patients of a tertiary care hospital for missing or inappropriate PPIs. Following relevance assessment by a pharmacist, the alerts raised were either displayed in the patients' electronic record or dismissed. After a three-month period, all adult patients' records were retrospectively reviewed for missing or inappropriate PPIs at discharge. The results were compared with a corresponding period before CDSS introduction. Sensitivity, specificity and outcome of alerts were quantified., Results: In a 3-month period with 5018 patients, the CDSS created 158 alerts for missing PPIs and 464 alerts for inappropriate PPIs. PPI prescribing was proposed 81 times and PPI termination 122 times, with acceptance rates of 73% and 34%, respectively. A specificity of 99.4% and sensitivity of 92.0% for missing PPIs and a specificity of 97.1% and a sensitivity of 69.7% for inappropriate PPIs were calculated. The algorithm reduced incidents of missing PPIs by 63.4% (p < 0.001) and of inappropriate PPIs by 16.2% (p = 0.022)., Conclusion: The algorithm identified patients without necessary gastroprotection or inappropriate PPIs with high specificity and acceptable sensitivity. It positively impacted the rational use of PPIs by reducing incidents of missing and inappropriate PPIs., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used due to their affordability and minimal severe side effects. However, their influence on the efficacy of cancer treatments, particularly androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSIs), remains unclear. This study investigates the impact of PPI usage on the treatment outcomes in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)., Methods: A total of 117 mCRPC patients were retrospectively analyzed and divided into two groups based on the concomitant use of PPI at the initiation of ARSI treatment: PPI+ (n = 38) and PPI- (n = 79). Patient characteristics, including age at ARSI treatment administered, prostate-specific antigen (PSA) value at ARSI treatment administered, International Society of Urological Pathology grade group at prostate biopsy, metastatic site at ARSI treatment administered, prior docetaxel (DTX) treatment, and type of ARSI (abiraterone acetate or enzalutamide) were recorded. Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and PSA response rates were compared between the two groups. Patients were further stratified by clinical background to compare PFS and OS between the two groups., Results: The PPI- group exhibited significantly extended PFS and a trend toward improved OS. For PSA response (reduction of 50% or more from baseline), the rates were 62.3% and 45.9% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. For deep PSA response (reductions of 90% or more from baseline), the rates were 36.4% and 24.3% in the PPI- group and the PPI+ group, respectively. The effects were consistent across subgroups divided by prior DTX treatment and type of ARSI administered., Conclusions: The administration of PPIs appears to diminish the therapeutic efficacy of ARSIs in mCRPC patients. Further prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings and explore the biological mechanisms involved., (© 2024 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objective: This meta-analysis aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of potassium-competitive acid blockers (P-CABs) and proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) in treating erosive esophagitis (EE)., Methods: PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science were systematically searched using predefined search terms up to January 2024. Relevant randomized controlled trials were included. The outcoming were the EE healing rate and treatment-related adverse events incidence., Results: Nine randomized controlled trials involving 4012 patients were included. Patients receiving P-CAB exhibited a significantly better overall healing rate compared with PPI at week 2 [risk ratio (RR) = 1.06], but no statistical difference was observed at week 4 and week 8. Subgroup analysis revealed that P-CAB demonstrated a higher healing rate for patients with Los Angeles (LA) grade C/D, regardless of the assessment at week 2 (RR = 1.17), week 4 (RR = 1.10), or week 8 (RR = 1.08). However, no significant difference was found between PPI and P-CAB for patients with LA grade A/B at week 2, week 4, or week 8. Furthermore, patients treated with P-CAB had lower recurrence rates during maintenance therapy compared with PPI (RR = 0.79). In terms of safety, P-CAB was associated with a lower incidence of headache compared with PPI (RR = 0.32), with no statistical difference found in any treatment-related adverse events between the two groups., Conclusions: P-CAB was found to be safe and effective for EE treatment compared with PPI, particularly in 2-week short-term treatment, severe EE (LA grade C/D) treatment, or maintenance therapy. Limitations such as potential heterogeneity among included trials should be considered in the interpretation of these findings., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background and Aims: Heartburn is the most common symptom seen in gastroenterology practice. We aimed to optimize cost-effective evaluation and management of heartburn., Methods: We developed a decision analytic model from insurer and patient perspectives comparing 4 strategies for patients failing empiric proton pump inhibitors (PPIs): (1) PPI optimization without testing, (2) endoscopy with PPI optimization for all patients, (3) endoscopy with PPI discontinuation when erosive findings are absent, and (4) endoscopy/ambulatory reflux monitoring with PPI discontinuation as appropriate for phenotypic management. Health outcomes were respectively defined on systematic reviews of clinical trials. Cost outcomes were defined on Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services databases and commercial multipliers for direct healthcare costs, and national observational studies evaluating healthcare utilization. The time horizon was 1 year. All testing was performed off PPI., Results: PPI optimization without testing cost $3784/y to insurers and $3128 to patients due to lower work productivity and suboptimal symptom relief. Endoscopy with PPI optimization lowered insurer costs by $1020/y and added 11 healthy days/y by identifying erosive reflux disease. Endoscopy with PPI discontinuation added 11 additional healthy days/y by identifying patients without erosive reflux disease that did not need PPI. By optimizing phenotype-guided treatment, endoscopy/ambulatory reflux monitoring with a trial of PPI discontinuation was the most effective of all strategies (gaining 22 healthy days/y) and saved $2183 to insurers and $2396 to patients., Conclusions: Among patients with heartburn, endoscopy with ambulatory reflux monitoring (off PPI) optimizes cost-effective management by matching treatment to phenotype. When erosive findings are absent, trialing PPI discontinuation is more cost-effective than optimizing PPI., (Copyright © 2024 AGA Institute. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of seven-day treatment with rabeprazole (Razo ® ) 20 mg once daily in patients with NERD and esophagitis based on monitoring the results of pH-impedancemetry of the stomach and esophagus and assessment of clinical symptoms., Materials and Methods: Thirty patients with typical GERD manifestations were examined. The study included patients who underwent pH-impedancemetry, endoscopic examination, and were prescribed treatment with rabeprazole at a dose of 20 mg once a day. Clinical monitoring was performed during three visits: before treatment, after 3 days, and after 7 days of treatment. Control pH-impedancemetry was performed after 7 days of therapy. The third visit was the endpoint of the study., Results: After 7 days of treatment, the response rate for heartburn was 86.7% in the overall group of patients with GERD, 94.4% in those with NERD, and 75.0% in patients with esophagitis stage A and B. After 7 days of therapy with rabeprazole, we registered a significant decrease in the total number of refluxes (from 88 to 54; p< 0.001), the number of acid refluxes (from 53 to 22; p< 0.001), the DeMeester index (from 23.81 to 7.62; p< 0.001), and AET (from 7.54 to 2.01; p< 0.001) in the esophagus and an increase in the median daily pH (from 1.8 to 5.4; p< 0.001) and the time with pH>4 in the stomach (from 2.57 hours and 10.7% up to 12.3 hours and 51.3%; p< 0.001). 7-day therapy with rabeprazole was accompanied by a significant improvement in GERD patients in all parameters of quality of life. 100% of patients with GERD rated their satisfaction with therapy as "good" and "very good"., Conclusion: As a result of 7-day therapy of patients with NERD and esophagitis with Razo ® at a dose of 20 mg per day, an excellent clinical response was obtained, confirmed by a marked optimization of pH-impedancemetry parameters.

Objective: The aim of this study was to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of the nine most widely studied Vonoprazan (VPZ)-based treatment regimens along with traditional Proton pump inhibitor (PPI)-based treatment regimens in eradicating Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection., Design: Through searching PubMed, Embase, Cochrane Library, Web of Science, we exclusively included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to investigate the efficacy of VPZ-based and PPI-based therapies for H. pylori infection. The included studies were evaluated for methodological quality using the Cochrane bias risk assessment tool, and the data analysis software was used to analyze the data accordingly., Results: The RCTs were collected from the earliest available date up to August 2023. Twenty-one RCTs were included, with a total sample size of 5481. The results of the network meta-analysis showed that the eradication rate of the VPZ-based quadruple 14-day (VPZ-Q14) treatment regimen in Intention-to-treat (ITT) analysis was the highest (SUCRA: 0.874); The eradication rate of the VPZ-based quadruple 10-day (VPZ-Q10) treatment plan in Per-protocol (PP) analysis was the highest (SUCRA: 0.849). All regimens were well tolerated without significant differences. According to the probability ranking of safety, high-dose VPZ-based dual 14-day therapy (H-VPZ-D14) ranked first in SUCRA, reaching 0.952. This indicates that H-VPZ-D14 treatment is the safest with a relatively low incidence of adverse effect. Therefore, VPZ-based therapies not only have a higher eradication rate, but also possess satisfactory safety., Conclusion: Compared with traditional PPI-based therapies, VPZ-based therapies have shown superior eradication effects. Based on the Ranking Plot of the Network, the VPZ-Q14 or VPZ-Q10 treatment regimen for H. pylori has a higher eradication rate and acceptable differences compared to other treatment regimens. In addition, for regions with high antibiotic resistance rates, we recommend a 14-day quadruple therapy with bismuth based on VPZ., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are frequently overprescribed and maintained without clear indication, leading to significant clinical and economic consequences. Deprescribing, which involves discontinuing or reducing the dose of a medication, lacks clear guidelines for PPIs, despite various approaches being described. Gradual tapering of PPIs appears to be an effective strategy, especially when combined with non-pharmacological measures and multimodal interventions. Additionally, it is crucial to involve the patient in the discussion and ensure a post-tapering follow-up plan., Competing Interests: Le Pr Omar Kherad est membre de l’assemblée « smartermedicine Choosing Wisely Switzerland » et président du groupe de travail « Choosing wisely » au sein de la fédération européenne de médecine interne. Les autres auteurs n’ont déclaré aucun conflit d’intérêts en relation avec cet article.

Background: With the increasing prevalence of antibiotic resistance, real-world data on the optimal empirical second-line therapy for Helicobacter pylori are still limited., Objectives: To evaluate the real-world efficacy of various second-line therapies for H. pylori., Patients and Methods: This was a retrospective population-based cohort study of all H. pylori-infected patients who had received the second-line treatment after the failure of primary clarithromycin triple therapy in Hong Kong between 2003 and 2018. The retreatment success rates of different second-line therapies were evaluated., Results: A total of 7591 patients who received second-line treatment were included. Notably, the most commonly prescribed regimen was still clarithromycin triple therapy, but the frequency of use had decreased from 59.5% in 2003-06 to 28.7% in 2015-18. Concomitant non-bismuth quadruple therapy had emerged as the commonest regimen (from 3.3% to 43.9%). In a validation analysis, the sensitivity and specificity of retreatment-inferred second-line treatment failure were 88.3% and 97.1%, respectively. The overall success rate of second-line therapies was 73.6%. Bismuth quadruple therapy had the highest success rate of 85.6%, while clarithromycin triple therapy had the lowest success rate of 63.5%. Specifically, bismuth/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, metronidazole/tetracycline triple, levofloxacin/metronidazole/tetracycline quadruple, rifabutin/amoxicillin triple and amoxicillin/levofloxacin triple therapies had relatively higher success rates over 80%. Age, treatment duration, baseline conditions and first-line treatment used were associated with success rate., Conclusions: Bismuth quadruple therapy was the most effective second-line regimen for H. pylori in this real-world study. Despite a very low success rate, clarithromycin-containing triple therapies were still commonly used as second-line regimens., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The eradication of Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) is crucial due to its rising prevalence and increasing resistance. Bismuth-containing quadruple therapies (BcQTs) have been proposed as a viable treatment option; however, the optimal duration for it remains contentious. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the clinical efficacy of short-term BcQT (defined as 7 or 10 days) with a standard 14-day course., Methods: A systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library was conducted for randomized controlled trials published in English until June 20, 2024. Eligibility criteria were applied to identify relevant studies. Summary risk ratios (RRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for the included studies regarding eradication rates, adverse effects, and compliance. This systematic review and meta-analysis was conducted in accordance with the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) statement and was previously registered in PROSPERO under registration number CRD42024547773., Results: This meta-analysis finally included 15 trials involving a total of 4505 patients. The eradication rates for short courses of BcQT were lower than those for the 14-day course (RR 0.96, 95% CI 0.93-0.99). However, the eradication rate for the 10-day therapy was comparable to that of the 14-day therapy (RR 0.98, 95% CI 0.95-1.00). Subgroup analyses of antibiotic combinations indicated that tetracycline and metronidazole combinations yielded similar H. pylori eradication rates in the 7-day versus the 14-day BcQT (RR 0.93, 95% CI 0.84-1.02). In the potassium-competitive acid blocker subgroup, the eradication rates remained similar across the 14-day group and the short-course treatment groups, whether evaluating the short-term treatment groups as a whole or the 7- and 10-day subgroups separately. Additionally, the adverse effects and compliance associated with the short course of BcQT were comparable to those of the 14-day therapy., Conclusion: A 10-day course of BcQT may represent the optimal treatment duration. Nevertheless, the choice of antibiotic combination should be guided by the regional antibiotic resistance patterns of H. pylori, as combinations with lower resistance rates are more effective., Trial Registration: PROSPERO number: CRD42024547773., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Treatment with potassium-competitive acid blockers has shown acceptable efficacy in Helicobacter pylori eradication. In regions like Korea, where the clarithromycin resistance rate is high, alternative combinations like non-bismuth quadruple therapies have shown favorable results. This study compared the outcomes of sequential eradication therapy with new potassium-competitive acid blocker tegoprazan and conventional esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy., Materials and Methods: Patients with Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) infection were consecutively recruited. Patients were allocated to either an esomeprazole-containing sequential or a tegoprazan-containing sequential therapy group. Sequential therapy comprised esomeprazole (40 mg) or tegoprazan (50 mg) plus amoxicillin (1000 mg) twice daily for the initial 5 days, followed by esomeprazole (40 mg) or tegoprazan (50 mg) with clarithromycin (500 mg) and metronidazole (500 mg) twice daily for the remaining 5 days. Eradication rate, compliance, and adverse events were recorded., Results: A total of 406 patients with H. pylori infection were enrolled in the trial and analyzed per protocol. Eradication rate by intention-to-treat and per-protocol was 83.8% (95% confidence interval [CI]: 78.7-88.9) for esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy, and 87.1% (95% CI: 82.5-91.8) for tegoprazan-containing sequential therapy, with no statistical significance (p = 0.399). Additionally, there was no statistically significant difference in treatment compliance between the two groups. Nausea was more prevalent (23.3%, 27/202) with sequential tegoprazans than with esomeprazole-containing sequential therapy (14.2%, 29/204; p = 0.022)., Conclusion: Tegoprazan-containing 10-day sequential eradication treatment demonstrated similar eradication efficacy compared to esomeprazole-containing treatment, even in regions with high antimicrobial resistance, such as Korea., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT06382493., (© 2024 The Author(s). Helicobacter published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: The optimal dosage of minocycline remains unclear for Helicobacter pylori (H. pylori) eradication. We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of four different regimens with minocycline and metronidazole compared to classical bismuth quadruple therapy for H. pylori rescue treatment., Materials and Methods: From March 2021 to March 2024, refractory H. pylori-infected patients with at least two previous treatment failures who received 14-day therapy with b.i.d. proton pump inhibitor 20 mg and bismuth 220 mg, plus tetracycline 400 mg q.i.d and metronidazole 400 mg q.i.d (BQT), or minocycline 50 mg q.i.d and metronidazole 400 mg q.i.d (PBMn 4 M 4 ), or minocycline 50 mg t.i.d and metronidazole 400 mg t.i.d (PBMn 3 M 3 ), or minocycline 50 mg b.i.d and metronidazole 400 mg q.i.d (PBMn 2 M 4 ), or minocycline 50 mg b.i.d and metronidazole 400 mg t.i.d (PBMn 2 M 3 ) were included in this retrospective study. H. pylori eradication was assessed by 13 C-urea breath test at least 6 weeks after treatment. All adverse effects during treatment were recorded., Results: Totally, 823 patients were enrolled: 251 with BQT, 97 with PBMn 4 M 4 , 191 with PBMn 3 M 3 , 108 with PBMn 2 M 4 , and 176 with PBMn 2 M 3 . The eradication rates of BQT, PBMn4M4, PBMn3M3, PBMn2M4, and PBMn2M3 were 89.2%, 87.6%, 91.6%, 88.0%, and 91.5%, respectively, by intention-to-treat analysis; 96.1%, 97.7%, 97.8%, 96.9%, and 97.6%, respectively, by modified intention-to-treat analysis; 97.1%, 97.5%, 97.7%, 96.8%, and 97.6%, respectively, by per-protocol analysis. Metronidazole resistance did not affect the efficacy of all groups. PBMn 2 M 3 group achieved the greatest compliance and the fewest moderate and severe adverse events., Conclusions: The novel bismuth-containing quadruple therapy with a low dose of minocycline and metronidazole is an alternative to classical bismuth quadruple therapy for H. pylori rescue treatment with superior safety and compliance., Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT06332599., (© 2024 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Introduction: Patients on systemic oral anticoagulation with vitamin K antagonists (VKA) or non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOAC) often require triple therapy following percutaneous coronary intervention, substantially increasing the risk of bleeding. Gastroprotective agents like proton pump inhibitors (PPI) are often employed to mitigate this risk, despite potential competitive inhibition between P2Y12-receptor inhibitors, NOACs, and VKAs. While the interactions and clinical outcomes of PPIs and DAPT have been frequently explored in literature, not many studies have evaluated the same outcomes for triple therapy., Areas Covered: This comprehensive narrative review of three studies on PPIs and triple from the PubMed/MEDLINE database supplemented by 23 other relevant studies aims to use the available literature to analyze the potential interactions between PPIs and triple therapy while shedding light on their mechanisms, clinical implications, and areas for optimization., Expert Opinion: If triple therapy is indicated following PCI, then patients at high-risk for bleeding may benefit from transition to apixaban and a PPI to lower the risk of gastrointestinal bleeding. More research is needed to determine the role of PPIs in triple therapies in prevention of gastrointestinal bleeding or potentiation of other adverse outcomes.

Background and Objectives: Numerous clinical concerns have been expressed regarding the potential worsening of cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitor effects in breast cancer patients because of co-administration of proton pump inhibitors. Hence, this study evaluated the effects of proton pump inhibitors on the pharmacokinetics of palbociclib and ribociclib in terms of  cytochrome P450 (CYP) 3A4 and P-glycoprotein involvement., Methods: The effects of omeprazole and rabeprazole on drug metabolism and efflux of these drugs were investigated using molecular docking, metabolic stability assay in rat liver microsomes, human recombinant CYP3A4 (rCYP3A4) enzymes, and Caco-2 cell monolayers, and in vivo pharmacokinetics with omeprazole and rabeprazole in (5 and 10 mg/kg) 30 min and 7 days before orally dosing palbociclib and ribociclib (10 mg/kg)., Results: Omeprazole and rabeprazole inhibited CYP3A4 enzyme activity in rCYP3A4 baculosomes with a 50-60% inhibition at 30 μM. Additionally, both omeprazole and rabeprazole (10 µm) significantly reduced the P-glycoprotein-mediated drug efflux of palbociclib and ribociclib. The 7-day pretreatment of omeprazole at a dose of 10 mg/kg resulted in 24% and 26% reductions in palbociclib's mean maximum plasma concentration) C max  and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC 0-24 h ), respectively. Palbociclib's pharmacokinetics were not significantly altered by the pretreatment with rabeprazole; however, ribociclib pharmacokinetics exhibited an 83.94% increase in AUC 0-24 h ., Conclusion: The findings indicate that long-term treatment with therapeutic doses of both omeprazole and rabeprazole can alter the pharmacokinetics of palbociclib and ribociclib. The co-administration of rabeprazole may alter the pharmacokinetics of palbociclib and ribociclib via CYP enzyme and P-glycoprotein inhibition., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Purpose: Patients in the intensive care unit (ICU) commonly receive stress ulcer prophylaxis drugs, either proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) or histamine-2 receptor blockers (H2RBs). The goal of this research was to evaluate the impact of these drugs on mortality among ICU patients hospitalized for major adverse cardiovascular and cerebrovascular events (MACCEs)., Methods: ICU patients hospitalized for MACCEs were sourced from the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care-III database. We performed a propensity score matching analysis to match patients treated with PPIs to those treated with H2RBs for stress ulcer prophylaxis. The outcome was 90-day mortality. We used multivariable Cox regression analyses to compare the effect. Hazard ratio (HR), 95% CIs, and P values were reported from the model., Findings: From 2001 to 2012, a total of 3577 patients hospitalized for MACCEs (1997 received PPIs and 1580 received H2RBs) were admitted. The 90-day mortality was 23.7% (848/3577); it was 27% (540/1997) and 19.5% (308/1580) for PPIs and H2RBs users, respectively. The PPI group exhibited a greater 90‑day mortality in comparison to the H2RBs group (relative risk = 1.17; P = 0.036), after conditioning on potential confounder. The results remained robust in propensity score matching, sensitivity analyses, and subgroup analyses., Implications: PPIs for stress ulcer prophylaxis were linked to an increased risk of in-hospital mortality than H2RBs in patients hospitalized for MACCEs. Further investigation of this association and validation of its clinical significance is needed., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest None., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Guidelines provide various recommendations for the use of proton pump inhibitors (PPI) to prevent upper gastrointestinal (UGI) bleeding in acute myocardial infarction (MI) treatment with dual antiplatelet therapy (DAPT). We evaluated the effects of PPIs in reducing the risk of severe UGI bleeding in patients with MI receiving DAPT., Methods: This retrospective cohort study included patients admitted for acute MI between 2014 and 2018, based on a nationwide health claims database in Korea. Primary outcome was admission for severe UGI bleeding requiring transfusion within 1 year of MI diagnosis. A multivariable Cox regression model was used to calculate the association between PPI use and severe UGI bleeding risk., Results: Of 100,556 patients with MI on DAPT (mean age, 63.7 years; 75.4% men), 37% were prescribed PPIs. Based on risk assessment for UGI bleeding, among 6,392 (6.4%) high-risk and 94,164 (93.6%) low-risk patients, 50.5% and 35.8% received PPIs, respectively. Overall, 0.5% of the patients experienced severe UGI bleeding within 1 year after MI. The use of PPI was associated with a reduced risk of severe UGI bleeding (hazard ratio [HR], 0.57; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47-0.70; P < 0.001). The benefits of PPIs were consistent in high-risk (HR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.45-1.13; P = 0.147) and low-risk (HR, 0.54; 95% CI, 0.43-0.68; P < 0.001) patients (P for interaction = 0.481)., Conclusions: Among Korean patients with MI receiving DAPT, PPIs were underutilized, even among those at high risk of severe UGI bleeding. Nonetheless, PPI use reduced severe UGI bleeding in low- and high-risk groups., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aim: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) may increase the risk of COVID-19 among non-vaccinated subjects via various mechanisms, including gut dysbiosis. We aimed to investigate whether PPIs also affect the clinical outcomes of COVID-19 among vaccine recipients., Methods: This was a territory-wide cohort study of 3 272 286 vaccine recipients (aged ≥ 18 years) of ≥ 2 doses of either BNT162b2 or CoronaVac. Exclusion criteria included prior gastrointestinal surgery, immunocompromised status, and prior COVID-19. The primary outcome was COVID-19, and secondary outcomes included COVID-19-related hospitalization and severe infection (composite of intensive care unit admission, ventilatory support, and/or death). Covariates include age, sex, the Charlson Comorbidity Index, comorbidities, and concomitant medication use. Subjects were followed from index date (first dose of vaccination) until outcome occurrence, death, additional dose of vaccination, or March 31, 2022. Exposure was pre-vaccination PPI use (any prescription within 90 days before the index date). Propensity score (PS) matching and a Poisson regression model were used to estimate the adjusted incidence rate ratio (aIRR) of outcomes with PPI use., Results: Among 439 154 PS-matched two-dose vaccine recipients (mean age: 65.3 years; male: 45.7%) with a median follow-up of 6.8 months (interquartile range: 2.6-7.9), PPI exposure was associated with a higher risk of COVID-19 (aIRR: 1.08; 95% confidence interval [95% CI]: 1.05-1.10), hospitalization (aIRR: 1.20; 95% CI: 1.08-1.33), and severe infection (aIRR: 1.57; 95% CI: 1.24-1.98). Among 188 360 PS-matched three-dose vaccine recipients (mean age: 62.5 years; male: 49.0%; median follow-up: 9.1 months [interquartile range: 8.0-10.9]), PPIs were associated with higher infection risk (aIRR: 1.11; 95% CI: 1.08-1.15) but not other outcomes., Conclusions: Although PPI use was associated with a higher COVID-19 risk, severe infection was limited to two-dose but not three-dose vaccine recipients., (© 2024 The Authors. Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology published by Journal of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Foundation and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.)

Background: With the increasing resistance to antimicrobial agents, susceptibility-guided tailored therapy has been emerging as an ideal strategy for Helicobacter pylori treatment. However, susceptibility-guided tailored therapy requires additional cost, time consumption, and invasive procedure (endoscopy) and its superiority over empirical quadruple therapy as the first-line H. pylori treatment remains unclear., Aims: To compare the efficacy of culture-based susceptibility-guided tailored versus empirical concomitant therapy as the first-line Helicobacter pylori treatment., Methods: This open-label, randomized trial was performed in four Korean institutions. A total of 312 Patients with H. pylori-positive culture test and naïve to treatment were randomly assigned in a 3:1 ratio to either culture-based susceptibility-guided tailored therapy (clarithromycin-based or metronidazole-based triple therapy for susceptible strains or bismuth quadruple therapy for dual-resistant strains, n = 234) or empirical concomitant therapy (n = 78) for 10 days. Eradication success was evaluated by 13 C-urea breath test at least 4 weeks after treatment., Results: Prevalence of dual resistance to both clarithromycin and metronidazole was 8%. H. pylori eradication rates for tailored and concomitant groups were 84.2% and 83.3% by intention-to-treat analysis (p = 0.859), respectively, and 92.9% and 91.5% by per-protocol analysis, respectively (p = 0.702), which were comparable between the two groups. However, eradication rates for dual-resistant strains were significantly higher in the tailored group than in the concomitant group. All adverse events were grade 1 or 2 based on the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events and the incidence was significantly lower in the tailored group. The proportion of patients discontinuing treatment for adverse events was comparable between the two groups (2.1% vs. 2.6%)., Conclusions: The culture-based susceptibility-guided tailored therapy failed to show superiority over the empirical concomitant therapy in terms of eradication rate. Based on these findings, the treatment choice in clinical practice would depend on the background rate of antimicrobial resistance, availability of resources and costs associated with culture and susceptibility testing., (© 2024 The Author(s). United European Gastroenterology Journal published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of United European Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: Proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use has been associated with an increased risk of gastrointestinal and upper respiratory infections in children. There are limited longitudinal data on the effect of PPI in children. The goal of this prospective observational study was to compare the stool and oropharyngeal microbiome of children before and after starting PPIs., Methods: We prospectively recruited participants from a gastroenterology clinic. Consented participants provided stool samples and oropharyngeal swabs at baseline and after 8 weeks of PPI therapy. Microbiome changes were measured by analyzing 16S sequencing from both body sites at both time points., Results: Thirty-four participants completed the study and provided samples both at baseline and after 8 weeks on PPI therapy. Of those, 24 participants had sufficient sequencing from both stool and oropharyngeal samples at both time points. There were no differences between the pre-PPI and post-PPI samples using beta-diversity metrics in either the oropharynx or stool. There were, however, significant changes in specific taxa. There was an enrichment of Streptococcus in the stool after PPI use and a reduction in the relative abundance of Bifidobacterium , Peptostreptococcus , and Turicibacter ( P -values < 0.01). Furthermore, there was an increase in the relative abundance of oropharyngeal bacteria in the stool after PPI therapy. This enrichment of oropharyngeal bacteria in the stool was most prominent in younger participants., Discussion: Further investigation is needed to determine the clinical and microbial factors that predispose or protect against microbiome changes due to PPI use and why young children are more susceptible to this PPI effect., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Introduction: Peptic ulcer disease (PUD) and postprocedural artificial ulcers are common ulcer disease. For them, proton pump inhibitor (PPI) and potassium-competitive acid blocker (P-CAB) are commonly used in clinical practice. PPI requires acid, time, and multiple doses, but P-CAB has fewer limitations. We compared the efficacy, safety, and prevention of PPI and P-CAB in PUD or artificial ulcer., Methods: We searched PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov , Embase, Cochrane Library, and Web of Science databases for all studies. All eligible randomized controlled trials up to August 5, 2023, were included. Healing rates, shrinking rates, treatment-emergent adverse events rates, and recurrence rates were measured. Risk of bias, sensitivity analyses, and heterogeneity were also performed., Results: Twenty researches that were selected from 926 screening studies and in total 6,551 participants were included. The risk ratio (RR) of healing rate with P-CABs vs PPIs of PUD at 4 weeks was RR 1.01 (95% confidence interval 0.98-1.04). In addition, the healing rate distinction of artificial peptic ulcer was RR 1.04 (0.89-1.22), and the shrinking rate was mean difference 0.10 (-1.30-1.51). The result of treatment-emergent adverse event rate of PUD was RR 1.11 (0.91-1.35), and the delayed bleeding rate of artificial ulcer was RR 0.35 (0.16-0.80). The RR for recurrence rate of drug-related ulcers was 0.45 (0.25-0.81)., Discussion: P-CAB is noninferior in healing artificial ulcer and PUD, also the incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events. But, there may be a statistical advantage in holding back delayed bleeding and preventing drug-induced ulcers. More standardized experiments are needed for further applications and more precise conclusions., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of The American College of Gastroenterology.)

Background: Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are widely used in cancer patients despite accumulating data showing that they can impact the efficacy of major anticancer drugs. This is particularly important with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (CPIs)., Results: Most TKIs require gastric acidity for their absorption and some retrospective series demonstrated that coprescription decreases the survival benefit of some TKI use (erlotinib, gefitinib and pazopanib). Relations between microbiota, the immune system, and the efficacy of immunotherapy are now obvious, just as modifications to gut flora after PPIs use are well-known. Many retrospective articles, including articles based on individual-participant data from randomized studies, demonstrated that patients treated with CPIs have a poorer outcome (overall survival, progression-free survival and response rate) when they received PPIs concomitantly, while there was no impact of such coprescription among patients in control arms, not treated with immunotherapies. Similar data were also observed in patients treated with palbociclib., Conclusion: For these interactions, it is very important to use the precautionary principle and warn patients and physicians about this. In patients who require acid suppression because of severe symptoms, using antacids or H2 blockers could be recommended., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background & Aims: High-dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy has been recommended to prevent rebleeding of high-risk peptic ulcer (PU) after hemostasis. Vonoprazan has been proven to be noninferior to PPIs in various acid-related diseases. This study aimed to compare the efficacy of vonoprazan vs PPI for preventing high-risk PU rebleeding after hemostasis., Methods: A multicenter, randomized, noninferiority study was conducted in 6 centers. Pre-endoscopic and endoscopic therapy were performed according to standard protocol. After successful hemostasis, patients with high-risk PU bleeding (Forrest class Ia/Ib, IIa/IIb) were randomized into 1:1 to receive vonoprazan (20 mg twice a day for 3 days, then 20 mg once a day for 28 days) or high-dose PPI (pantoprazole intravenous infusion 8 mg/h for 3 days, then omeprazole 20 mg twice a day for 28 days). The primary outcome was a 30-day rebleeding rate. Secondary outcomes included 3- and 7-day rebleeding rate, all-cause and bleeding-related mortality, rate of rescue therapy, blood transfusion, length of hospital stay, and safety., Results: Of 194 patients, baseline characteristics, severity of bleeding, and stage of ulcers were comparable between the 2 groups. The 30-day rebleeding rates in vonoprazan and PPI groups were 7.1% (7 of 98) and 10.4% (10 of 96), respectively; noninferiority (within 10% margin) of vonoprazan to PPI was confirmed (%risk difference, -3.3; 95% confidence interval, -11.2 to 4.7; P < .001). The 3-day and 7-day rebleeding rates in the vonoprazan group remained noninferior to PPI (P < .001 by Farrington and Manning test). All secondary outcomes were also comparable between the 2 groups., Conclusion: In patients with high-risk PU bleeding, the efficacy of vonoprazan in preventing 30-day rebleeding was noninferior to intravenous PPI. (ClinicalTrials.gov, Number: NCT05005910)., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Recent studies suggest that Omeprazole, a widely used treatment for gastric acid-related disorders, may have a significant effect on human cognition. However, there is no consensus on the matter. Though some studies suggest the drug is associated with an increased risk of cognitive decline, memory impairment, and dementia, this issue has not been sufficiently studied. Therefore, the goal of this study was to investigate the cognitive impairments associated with long-term Omeprazole treatment, with a focus on memory, attention, and executive functions. Additionally, we sought to verify whether the duration of treatment was associated with the magnitude of the associated cognitive impairments. The sample consisted of 30 participants of both genders treated with Omeprazole (experimental group) and 30 participants who did not use the drug (control group). The cognitive assessment battery: Verbal Fluency, Rey Auditory-Verbal Learning, Attention Assessment Battery, Five Digit Test, Hayling Test, and NEUPSILIN Subtest. The groups were compared using Student's T-tests, and the association between treatment duration and cognitive performance was examined using Pearson's coefficients. The results showed significant group differences in verbal fluency, short-term episodic memory, selective attention, and executive functions. The duration of Omeprazole treatment was also positively associated with the magnitude of cognitive impairment.

Background: Evidence suggests proton pump inhibitor (PPI) use may attenuate the effect of abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) in metastatic prostate cancer via the modification of gut microbiota. This study aimed to examine whether concomitant PPI use is associated with survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer treated with androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) and AAP., Methods: Post-hoc analysis was conducted in patients with metastatic castration-sensitive prostate cancer (mCSPC) and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) treated in the LATITUDE, COU-AA-301, and COU-AA-302 trials (ADT vs. ADT plus AAP). PPI users and non-users were compared for restricted mean overall survival time (RMOST) and restricted mean progression-free survival time (RMPFST) based on inverse probability of treatment weight (IPTW)-adjusted Kaplan-Meier curves. IPTW-adjusted Cox regression models were used to assess heterogeneity of treatment effect., Results: In patients treated with AAP, PPI use was associated with inferior RMOST [difference (95% confidence interval): -4.2 (-7.0 to -1.4)] and RMPFST [-3.5 (-6.6 to -0.4)] compared with non-users. However, RMOST and RMPFST were similar between PPI users and non-users in patients treated with ADT alone [RMOST, -2.6 (-5.8 to 0.6); RMPFST, -1.7 (-4.8 to 1.4)]. Interaction term analyses did not show evidence of heterogeneity in treatment effect between AAP and ADT, despite the prominent treatment effect shown in mCSPC vs. mCRPC., Conclusions: PPI use may be associated with inferior survival in patients with metastatic prostate cancer who receive ADT plus AAP. Discontinuing unnecessary PPI use might improve those outcomes., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

Abstract: Helicobacter pylori is the most common chronic bacterial infection worldwide. Because of the risk for chronic gastritis, peptic ulcer disease, and gastric malignancy, all patients with H. pylori should be treated. Unfortunately, eradication rates remain low, and barriers to successful treatment include inadequate acid suppression, locoregional antibiotic resistance, and patient nonadherence to complicated treatment regimens. Vonoprazan, a new medication for the treatment of H. pylori infections, provides more potent acid suppression and is simpler to dose than proton pump inhibitors. This article provides a data-driven algorithm for incorporating vonoprazan into the treatment of patients with H. pylori infections., (Copyright © 2024 American Academy of Physician Associates.)

Background: Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a severe postoperative complication in patients undergoing major surgery. Proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) are used preoperatively as prophylaxis for postoperative gastrointestinal bleeding. Whether preoperative PPI use is associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI remains uncertain., Methods: This retrospective cohort study used electronic medical records from the clinical data warehouse of Peking University First Hospital to screen all adult hospitalizations undergoing major surgery between 1 January 2018 and 31 December 2020. Exposure was preoperative PPI use, defined as PPI use within 7 days before major surgery. The primary outcome was postoperative AKI, defined as AKI occurring within 7 days after major surgery; secondary outcomes included in-hospital AKI and in-hospital mortality., Results: A total of 21,533 patients were included in the study (mean [ SD ] age, 57.8 [15.0] years; 51.2% male), of which 944 (4.4%) were prescribed PPI within 7 days before major surgery (PPI users). Overall, 72 PPI users (7.6%) and 356 non-users (1.7%) developed postoperative AKI. After adjustment, preoperative PPI use was associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI (adjusted OR, 1.47; 95% CI, 1.04-2.07) and in-hospital AKI (adjusted OR, 1.41; 95% CI, 1.03-1.94). Moreover, subgroup analyses showed that the risk of PPI on postoperative AKI was amplified by the concomitant use of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs or diuretics. No significant difference was observed between preoperative PPI use and in-hospital mortality in the fully adjusted model (adjusted OR 1.63; 95% CI, 0.55-4.85)., Conclusions: Preoperative PPI use was associated with an increased risk of AKI in patients undergoing major surgery. This risk may be enhanced by the concomitant use of other nephrotoxic drugs. Clinicians should weigh the pros and cons before initiating PPI prophylaxis.

Introduction: The use of proton-pump inhibitors (PPI) is linked with infrequent but serious adverse events, including acute kidney injury, chronic kidney disease (CKD) and progression of CKD. Data on renal safety in routine use of PPI are more relevant to clinical practice. We studied whether such use of PPI is associated with renal dysfunction., Methods: Patients taking PPI for at least six weeks had serum creatinine tested pre (n = 200) and post (n = 180) recruitment. These patients were then advised to follow-up: those taking PPI for at least 90 days in the next six months (n = 77) and at least another 90 days in the following six months (n = 50), had serum creatinine tested at such follow-up. Renal dysfunction was defined as any increase in serum creatinine level above baseline., Results: The 200 patients recruited had mean age 39.6 (SD 9.2) years. Ninety-eight (49%) patients had a history of previous PPI use (median six months; interquartile range [IQR] 3-24). Only 20 (11.1%) patients at six weeks, 11 (14.3%) at six months and six (12%) at one year had increase in creatinine level; a majority of them had less than 0.3 mg/dL increase. Ten of these 20 (six weeks), five of 11 (six months) and five of six (one year) had other risk factors for renal dysfunction. No patient developed CKD during the study period., Conclusions: Mild and non-progressive increase in serum creatinine occurred in 10% to 15% of patients on routine PPI use. A majority of them had other risk factors. Small sample size and short follow-up duration are a few limitations of this study., (© 2024. Indian Society of Gastroenterology.)