Search

Background Endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided lumen-apposing metal stents (LAMS) are preferred for draining symptomatic large pancreatic fluid collections (PFCs). A concurrent coaxial double-pigtail plastic stent (DPPS) is proposed to reduce adverse events associated with LAMS. We aimed to perform a comparative outcome analysis of LAMS with or without DPPS for PFCs. Methods Electronic databases from January 2005 through July 2023 were searched for studies comparing the use of LAMS with or without DPPS for PFCs. Pooled proportions were calculated using fixed (inverse variance) and random-effects (DerSimonian-Laird) models. Results After reviewing 1780 studies, we extracted data from 6 studies comprising 348 patients. The weighted odds of overall technical success, using LAMS plus DPPS compared to LAMS alone, were 0.53 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.15-1.83), and the odds of clinical success were 1.10 (95%CI 0.59-2.05). The weighted odds of total adverse events with LAMS compared to LAMS plus DPPS were 2.21 (95%CI 1.37-3.59). Analysis of individual adverse events showed that the odds of stent occlusion when LAMS alone was used compared to LAMS plus DPPS was 2.36 (95%CI 1.12-4.98). The odds of bleeding were 1.84 (95%CI 0.77-4.38), and the odds of stent migration 0.95 (95%CI 0.40-2.23). Conclusions EUS-guided LAMS placement is the current standard of care for managing symptomatic large PFCs. Concurrent use of coaxial DPPS can mitigate the overall adverse events observed with LAMS, while maintaining similar technical and clinical success. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is an effective resection technique for early cancers and large gastrointestinal luminal lesions. However, ESD is technically challenging, with the potential for severe adverse events. Scissor-type ESD (ST-ESD) knives with an inner cutting edge and an electrically insulated external coating could mitigate some of these risks. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of ST electrosurgical knives when used for ESDs. Methods: Electronic databases were queried for studies from January 2005 through December 2022 evaluating the performance of ST-ESD knives. Fixed- and random-effects models were used to calculate pooled proportions. Heterogeneity was assessed using the I2 test and by constructing funnel plots, while bias was calculated using Egger and Harbord bias indicators. Results: Final analysis included data from 17 studies comprising 1652 ESD procedures. The pooled en bloc resection rate and R0 resection rate were 97.94% (95% confidence interval [CI] 97.20-98.57) and 94.32% (95%CI 93.11-95.43), respectively. The main adverse events were perforation and delayed post-procedural bleeding, with pooled rates of 1.07% (95%CI 0.63-1.62) and 1.86% (95%CI 1.26-2.56), respectively. There was no heterogeneity, as indicated by an I2 score of 0% (95%CI 0-44.50%). The mean procedure time was 67.45 min (95%CI 58.01-76.89). Conclusions: Our analysis shows that ST-ESD knives deliver consistently good performance across various locations in the gastrointestinal lumen and lesion sizes, with a good safety profile. This could be particularly appealing to newer adopters of ESD. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Heller myotomy has been considered the standard surgical treatment for patients with achalasia. Since the initiation of peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM), it has represented an alternative for treating patients with achalasia. Over the years, numerous prospective and retrospective studies with POEM use for achalasia have been published. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis to evaluate the efficacy and safety of POEM in patients with achalasia. Methods: Publications investigating the safety and efficacy of POEM in patients with achalasia were searched in Medline, Ovid Journals, Medline non-indexed citations, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and Database of Systematic Reviews. Pooling was conducted by both fixed and random effects models. Results: The initial search identified 328 reference articles; of these, 34 relevant articles were selected and reviewed. Data was extracted from 20 studies (n = 1753) which met the inclusion criteria. In pooled analysis, the clinical success of POEM at 3 months was 94% (95% CI = 93-95). The pooled clinical success of POEM at 12 months was 91% (95% CI = 90-92). The pooled rate of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) was 21% (95% CI = 19-23), esophagitis was reported in 16% (95% CI = 15-18), pneumomediastinum in 4% (95% CI = 3-6), cervical emphysema in 12% (95% CI = 10-13), pneumoperitoneum in 8% (95% CI = 7-10), pneumothorax in 5% (95% CI = 4 - 6), pleural effusion in 3% (95% CI = 2-3), post-operative bleeding in 4.29% (95% CI = 1.91 -7.61) and aspiration pneumonia in 3.08% (95% CI = 1.13-5.97) of the patients after POEM. Conclusion: This meta-analysis suggests that POEM is a highly effective and safe endoscopic treatment for patients with achalasia and a reasonable alternative to Heller myotomy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS : Peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is a minimally invasive endoscopic procedure for the treatment of achalasia and certain spastic esophageal motility disorders, delivering excellent results in experienced hands. However, this complex and technically challenging procedure requires advanced endoscopic skills. The aim of this study was to conduct a systematic review and meta-analysis of current data to evaluate the learning curve for POEM in new adopters of this technique. METHODS : Electronic databases (PubMed, Embase, and Cochrane Library) from inception to November 2021 were searched for publications addressing the learning curve in POEM. Pooling was conducted by both fixed- and random-effects models. Secondary outcomes reviewed were clinical success defined by Eckardt score ≤ 3 when available and adverse events. RESULTS : Eight studies involving 1904 patients met the inclusion criteria. In the pooled analysis, new adopters of POEM attained proficiency at a mean of 24.67 procedures (95 %CI 23.93 to 25.41). Once proficiency was achieved, the pooled total procedure time plateaued at a mean of 85.38 minutes (95 %CI 81.48 to 89.28), the pooled mean procedure time per centimeter of myotomy was 6.25 minutes (95 %CI 5.69 to 6.82), and the pooled mean length of myotomy was 11.49 cm (95 %CI 10.90 to 12.08). CONCLUSIONS : Our analysis showed that new adopters of POEM with previous advanced endoscopy experience required about 25 procedures to attain proficiency. The average time for each procedure once proficiency was attained was about 85 minutes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]