Search

Abstract Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) transformation accounts for 3–14% of resistance in EGFR-TKI relapsed lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), with unknown molecular mechanisms and optimal treatment strategies. We performed transcriptomic analyses (including bulk and spatial transcriptomics) and multiplex immunofluorescence on pre-treated samples from LUADs without transformation after EGFR-TKI treatment (LUAD-NT), primary SCLCs (SCLC-P) and LUADs with transformation after EGFR-TKI treatment (before transformation: LUAD-BT; after transformation: SCLC-AT). Our study found that LUAD-BT exhibited potential transcriptomic characteristics for transformation compared with LUAD-NT. We identified several pathways that shifted during transformation, and the transformation might be promoted by epigenetic alterations (such as HDAC10, HDAC1, DNMT3A) within the tumor cells instead of within the tumor microenvironment. For druggable pathways, transformed-SCLC were proved to be less dependent on EGF signaling but more relied on FGF signaling, while VEGF-VEGFR pathway remained active, indicating potential treatments after transformation. We also found transformed-SCLC showed an immuno-exhausted status which was associated with the duration of EGFR-TKI before transformation. Besides, SCLC-AT exhibited distinct molecular subtypes from SCLC-P. Moreover, we constructed an ideal 4-marker model based on transcriptomic and IHC data to predict SCLC transformation, which obtained a sensitivity of 100% and 87.5%, a specificity of 95.7% and 100% in the training and test cohorts, respectively. We provided insights into the molecular mechanisms of SCLC transformation and the differences between SCLC-AT and SCLC-P, which might shed light on prevention strategies and subsequent therapeutic strategies for SCLC transformation in the future.

Abstract Introduction Identifying new biomarkers for predicting immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) response in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is crucial. We aimed to assess the variant allele frequency (VAF)-related profile as a novel biomarker for NSCLC personalized therapy. Methods We utilized genomic data of 915 NSCLC patients via cBioPortal and a local cohort of 23 patients for model construction and mutational analysis. Genomic, transcriptomic data from 952 TCGA NSCLC patients, and immunofluorescence (IF) assessment with the local cohort supported mechanism analysis. Results Utilizing the random forest algorithm, a 15-gene VAF-related model was established, differentiating patients with durable clinical benefit (DCB) from no durable benefit (NDB). The model demonstrated robust performance, with ROC-AUC values of 0.905, 0.737, and 0.711 across training (n = 313), internal validation (n = 133), and external validation (n = 157) cohorts. Stratification by the model into high- and low-score groups correlated significantly with both progression-free survival (PFS) (training: P

Abstract Background In the era of second-generation ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ALK-TKIs), there was a paucity of data regarding the progression patterns, resistant mechanisms, and subsequent therapeutic approaches for ALK-positive (ALK+) non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC were retrospectively selected from our center. Cohort 1 consisted of patients who experienced disease progression after receiving first-line alectinib treatment (n = 20), while Cohort 2 included patients who progressed following sequential treatment with crizotinib and second-generation ALK-TKIs (n = 53). Oligo-progression was defined as the occurrence of disease progression in no more than three lesions. Symptomatic progression was determined when patients developed new symptoms or experienced worsening of pre-existing symptoms during radiological progression. Results The incidence of central nervous system (CNS) progression and symptomatic CNS progression was significantly lower in Cohort 1 compared to patients treated with crizotinib, with rates of 15.0% vs. 56.6% (p = 0.002) and 5.0% vs. 32.1% (p = 0.016), respectively. A total of 60.3% (44/73) patients underwent repeated biopsy and next-generation sequencing subsequent to the second-generation ALK-TKI resistance, with secondary mutation in ALK kinase domain emerging as the predominant mechanism of resistance (56.8%). Local therapy was applied to 50% of oligo-progression cases. Subsequent ALK-TKIs demonstrated significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS) (8.6 m vs. 2.7 m, p = 0.021, HR = 0.43, 95%CI: 0.15–0.85) and long-term overall survival (OS) (NA vs. 11.9 m, p = 0.132, HR = 0.50, 95%CI: 0.18–1.25) in patients harboring ALK resistance mutations, compared to those without such mutations. For patients without ALK-resistant mutations following progression on second-generation ALK-TKIs, there was no statistically significant difference in survival outcomes between subsequent chemotherapy or alternative ALK-TKI treatments. Conclusions First-line alectinib demonstrated superior efficacy in protecting the CNS compared to crizotinib. For patients with ALK-resistant mutations following the resistance to second-generation ALK-TKIs, appropriate sensitive ALK-TKI should be administered; for those without such mutations, the selection of chemotherapy or third-generation ALK-TKI should be based on the patient’s overall physical health and personal preferences.

Summary: Background: This was a multicenter, single-arm dose-ranging phase 2 study aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of LY01610, a liposomal irinotecan, at various doses for patients with relapsed small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Methods: This study (NCT04381910) enrolled patients with relapsed SCLC at 10 hospitals across China, who have failed with previous platinum-based treatments. LY01610 was administered at doses of 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2. Primary endpoints were investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR) and investigator-assessed duration of response (DoR). Secondary endpoints included investigator-assessed disease control rate (DCR), investigator-assessed progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. Findings: From September 3, 2020 to March 3, 2022, a total of 66 patients were enrolled, with 6, 30, and 30 allocated to the 60 mg/m2, 80 mg/m2, and 100 mg/m2 dose groups, respectively, with 68% (45/66) having a chemotherapy-free interval

Abstract MDM2 has been established as a biomarker indicating poor prognosis for individuals undergoing immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) treatment for different malignancies by various pancancer studies. Specifically, patients who have MDM2 amplification are vulnerable to the development of hyperprogressive disease (HPD) following anticancer immunotherapy, resulting in marked deleterious effects on survival rates. The mechanism of MDM2 involves its role as an oncogene during the development of malignancy, and MDM2 can promote both metastasis and tumor cell proliferation, which indirectly leads to disease progression. Moreover, MDM2 is vitally involved in modifying the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) as well as in influencing immune cells, eventually facilitating immune evasion and tolerance. Encouragingly, various MDM2 inhibitors have exhibited efficacy in relieving the TIME suppression caused by MDM2. These results demonstrate the prospects for breakthroughs in combination therapy using MDM2 inhibitors and anticancer immunotherapy.

Abstract. Background:. The brain is a common metastatic site in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), resulting in a relatively poor prognosis. Systemic therapy with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) is recommended as the first-line treatment for EGFR-mutated, advanced NSCLC patients. However, intracranial activity varies in different drugs. Thus, brain metastasis (BM) should be considered when choosing the treatment regimens. We conducted this network meta-analysis to explore the optimal first-line therapeutic schedule for advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with different BM statuses. Methods:. Randomized controlled trials focusing on EGFR-TKIs (alone or in combination) in advanced and EGFR-mutant NSCLC patients, who have not received systematic treatment, were systematically searched up to December 2021. We extracted and analyzed progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). A network meta-analysis was performed with the Bayesian statistical model to determine the survival outcomes of all included therapy regimens using the R software. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were used to compare intervention measures, and overall rankings of therapies were estimated under the Bayesian framework. Results:. This analysis included 17 RCTs with 5077 patients and 12 therapies, including osimertinib + bevacizumab, aumolertinib, osimertinib, afatinib, dacomitinib, standards of care (SoC, including gefitinib, erlotinib, or icotinib), SoC + apatinib, SoC + bevacizumab, SoC + ramucirumab, SoC + pemetrexed based chemotherapy (PbCT), PbCT, and pemetrexed free chemotherapy (PfCT). For patients with BM, SoC + PbCT improved PFS compared with SoC (HR = 0.40, 95% CI: 0.17–0.95), and osimertinib + bevacizumab was most likely to rank first in PFS, with a cumulative probability of 34.5%, followed by aumolertinib, with a cumulative probability of 28.3%. For patients without BM, osimertinib + bevacizumab, osimertinib, aumolertinib, SoC + PbCT, dacomitinib, SoC + ramucirumab, SoC + bevacizumab, and afatinib showed superior efficacy compared with SoC (HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.20–0.90; HR = 0.46, 95% CI: 0.31–0.68; HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.34–0.77; HR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.38–0.66; HR = 0.62, 95% CI: 0.43–0.89; HR = 0.64, 95% CI: 0.44–0.94; HR = 0.61, 95% CI: 0.48–0.76; HR = 0.71, 95% CI: 0.50–1.00), PbCT (HR = 0.29, 95% CI: 0.11–0.74; HR = 0.31, 95% CI: 0.15–0.62; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.17–0.69; HR = 0.34, 95% CI: 0.18–0.64; HR = 0.42, 95% CI: 0.21–0.82; HR = 0.43, 95% CI: 0.22–0.87; HR = 0.41, 95% CI: 0.22–0.74; HR = 0.48, 95% CI: 0.31–0.75), and PfCT (HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06–0.32; HR = 0.15, 95% CI: 0.09–0.26; HR = 0.17, 95% CI: 0.09–0.29; HR = 0.16, 95% CI: 0.10–0.26; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12–0.35; HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12–0.39; HR = 0.20, 95% CI: 0.12–0.31; HR = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.16–0.34) in terms of PFS. And, SoC + apatinib showed relatively superior PFS when compared with PbCT (HR = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.22–0.92) and PfCT (HR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.12–0.39), but similar PFS to SoC (HR = 0.65, 95% CI: 0.42–1.03). No statistical differences were observed for PFS in patients without BM between PbCT and SoC (HR = 1.49, 95% CI: 0.84–2.64), but both showed favorable PFS when compared with PfCT (PfCT vs. SoC, HR = 3.09, 95% CI: 2.06–4.55; PbCT vs. PfCT, HR = 0.14, 95% CI: 0.06–0.32). For patients without BM, osimertinib + bevacizumab was most likely to rank the first, with cumulative probabilities of 47.1%. For OS, SoC + PbCT was most likely to rank first in patients with and without BM, with cumulative probabilities of 46.8%, and 37.3%, respectively. Conclusion:. Osimertinib + bevacizumab is most likely to rank first in PFS in advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients with or without BM, and SoC + PbCT is most likely to rank first in OS.

Abstract Background Patients with brain oligometastases have better prognosis than those with synchronous extracranial metastases in non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, studies focusing on intracranial‐only recurrence after curative surgery remained scarce. This study aimed to explore distinct features of patients with exclusive brain relapse after resection of lung adenocarcinoma. Methods Records were retrospectively reviewed of 2809 patients who had complete resection and pathologically confirmed stage IB‐IIIA NSCLC in our hospital from October 2012 to September 2019. Patients were enrolled if they were adenocarcinoma and developed intracranial recurrence thereafter. They were divided into two groups depending on whether they had synchronous extracranial metastases. Clinical and pathological features of patients enrolled were collected and compared between groups. Results Ninety‐seven lung adenocarcinoma patients with intracranial recurrences were enrolled. The median follow‐up time was 40 months. Fifty patients (51.5%) had brain oligometastases and 47 patients had synchronous extracranial metastases (ECM). Multivariate logistic regression suggested EGFR‐sensitive mutation and male sex were positively correlated to brain‐only recurrence (OR = 2.59, 95%CI 1.04–6.84 and OR = 2.58, 95% CI 1.05–6.75), while higher clinical stage was associated with synchronous ECM (stage II (OR = 0.33, 95%CI 0.09–1.14) or stage IIIA (OR = 0.54, 95%CI 0.20–1.38) versus stage I). No other pathological feature (lymphovascular invasion, visceral pleural invasion, low tumor differentiation, etc.) or adjuvant chemotherapy was associated with intracranial‐only relapse after complete resection of primary tumor. Conclusion Among patients with brain relapse after resection of lung adenocarcinoma, patients with EGFR mutations might have intracranial relapse only without synchronous extracranial metastases. Further prospective studies are warranted to verify this.

Abstract Objectives Central nervous system (CNS) metastases including brain metastases (BM) and leptomeningeal metastases (LM) are frequent in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and are correlated with poor outcomes. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy of single-agent furmonertinib 160 mg or combining with anti-angiogenic agent in NSCLC patients who had developed BM/LM progression from previous tyrosine kinase inhibior (TKI) treatment. Methods EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients who developed BM (the BM cohort) or LM progression (the LM cohort) were included, having received furmonertinib 160 mg daily as second-line or later treatment, with or without anti-angiogenic agents. The intracranial efficacy was evaluated by intracranial progression-free survival (iPFS). Results Totally 12 patients in the BM cohort and 16 patients in the LM cohort were included. Almost one half of patients in the BM cohort and a majority in the LM cohort had a poor physical status, with a Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG-PS) ≥2. The administration of single-agent furmonertinib or combination treatment achieved a median iPFS of 3.6 months (95%CI 1.435–5.705) in the BM cohort, and 4.3 months (95%CI 2.094–6.486) in the LM cohort. Subgroup and univariate analysis has shown that a good ECOG-PS correlated with a favorable efficacy of furmonertinib in the BM cohort (median iPFS = 2.1 with ECOG-PS ≥ 2 vs. 14.6 months with ECOG-PS

Abstract Introduction Dysregulated ARID1A expression is frequently detected in lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) and mediates significant changes in cancer behaviors and a poor prognosis. ARID1A deficiency in LUAD enhances proliferation and metastasis, which could be induced by activation of the Akt signaling pathway. However, no further exploration of the mechanisms has been performed. Methods Lentivirus was used for the establishment of the ARID1A knockdown (ARID1A-KD) cell line. MTS and migration/invasion assays were used to examine changes in cell behaviors. RNA-seq and proteomics methods were applied. ARID1A expression in tissue samples was determined by IHC. R software was used to construct a nomogram. Results ARID1A KD significantly promoted the cell cycle and accelerated cell division. In addition, ARID1A KD increased the phosphorylation level of a series of oncogenic proteins, such as EGFR, ErbB2 and RAF1, activated the corresponding pathways and resulted in disease progression. In addition, the bypass activation of the ErbB pathway, the activation of the VEGF pathway and the expression level changes in epithelial–mesenchymal transformation biomarkers induced by ARID1A KD contributed to the insensitivity to EGFR-TKIs. The relationship between ARID1A and the sensitivity to EGFR-TKIs was also determined using tissue samples from LUAD patients. Conclusion Loss of ARID1A expression influences the cell cycle, accelerates cell division, and promotes metastasis. EGFR-mutant LUAD patients with low ARID1A expression had poor overall survival. In addition, low ARID1A expression was associated with a poor prognosis in EGFR-mutant LUAD patients who received first-generation EGFR-TKI treatment. Video abstract

Abstract Surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy is the standard of care for selected patients with early‐stage or locally advanced non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, many of these patients still experience postoperative recurrence at 5 years. At present, peri‐operative treatment methods are emerging to prevent early relapse, such as targeted therapy and immunotherapy. Investigation on predictive biomarkers of responses to adjuvant and neoadjuvant therapies is also continuously ongoing. Immunotherapy represented by immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), either by monotherapy or in combination with chemotherapy, has shown benefit in promoting pathological responses and prolonging survival for patients with NSCLC without oncogenic mutations. Exploratory studies have also provided evidence regarding the selection of patients who benefit from ICI‐based perioperative treatment. This review focuses on the existing data of current clinical trials of adjuvant and neoadjuvant strategies with ICIs in resectable NSCLC, the exploration of predictive biomarkers, and the perspectives and urgent challenges in the future.

Abstract Background Treatment options for Chinese patients with locally advanced or metastatic squamous‐cell non‐small‐cell lung cancer (sqNSCLC) after failure of first‐line chemotherapy are limited. This study (ORIENT‐3) aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of sintilimab versus docetaxel as second‐line treatment in patients with locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC. Methods ORIENT‐3 was an open‐label, multicenter, randomized controlled phase 3 trial that recruited patients with stage IIIB/IIIC/IV sqNSCLC after failure with first‐line platinum‐based chemotherapy. Patients were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive either 200 mg of sintilimab or 75 mg/m2 of docetaxel intravenously every 3 weeks, stratified by the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS) in the full analysis set (FAS). Secondary endpoints included progression‐free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR) and safety. Results Between August 25, 2017, and November 7, 2018, 290 patients were randomized. For FAS, 10 patients from the docetaxel arm were excluded. The median OS was 11.79 (n = 145; 95% confidence interval [CI], 10.28‐15.57) months with sintilimab versus 8.25 (n = 135; 95% CI, 6.47‐9.82) months with docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74; 95% CI, 0.56‐0.96; P = 0.025). Sintilimab treatment significantly prolonged PFS (median 4.30 vs. 2.79 months; HR: 0.52; 95% CI, 0.39‐0.68; P < 0.001) and showed higher ORR (25.50% vs. 2.20%, P < 0.001) and DCR (65.50% vs. 37.80%, P < 0.001) than the docetaxel arm. The median DoR was 12.45 (95% CI, 4.86‐25.33) months in the sintilimab arm and 4.14 (95% CI, 1.41‐7.23) months in the docetaxel arm (P = 0.045). Treatment‐related adverse events of grade ≥ 3 were reported in 26 (18.1%) patients in the sintilimab arm and 47 (36.2%) patients in the docetaxel arm. Exploratory biomarker analysis showed potential predictive values of expression levels of two transcription factors, including OVOL2 (HR: 0.35; P < 0.001) and CTCF (HR: 3.50; P < 0.001)，for sintilimab treatment. Conclusions Compared with docetaxel, sintilimab significantly improved the OS, PFS, and ORR of Chinese patients with previously treated locally advanced or metastatic sqNSCLC.

Abstract Background Conteltinib (CT-707) is a potent second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) showing promising anti-tumor activities in preclinical studies. This study aimed to assess the safety, pharmacokinetic (PK), and efficacy of conteltinib in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods In this multicenter, single-arm, open-label, first-in-human phase 1 study, conteltinib was taken orally at doses of 50 to 800 mg quaque die (QD) in a dose-escalation phase. If the response was observed in a dose cohort of the dose-escalation phase, dose expansion was started. The primary endpoints were maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), and adverse events assessed by investigators. Results Between April 13, 2016, and February 8, 2020, 64 ALK-positive NSCLC patients were enrolled, including 41 (64.1%) patients with ALK TKI-naïve and 23 (35.9%) patients who received crizotinib previously. In the dose-escalation phase, 26 patients were treated with conteltinib at doses of 50 mg, 100 mg, 200 mg, 300 mg, 450 mg, 600 mg, and 800 mg QD. One DLT event was reported at the dose of 600 mg. MTD was not reached. Overall, 58 (90.6%) patients experienced treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs) and 9 (14.1%) patients had grade ≥ 3 TRAEs. The most common TRAEs were diarrhea (46 [71.9%]), serum creatinine elevated (29 [45.3%]), aspartate aminotransferase elevated (25 [39.1%]), and nausea (24 [37.5%]). Among 39 ALK TKI-naïve patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 64.1% (25 of 39; 95% confidence interval [CI], 47.2–78.8), median progression-free survival (PFS) was 15.9 months (95% CI, 9.26–23.3), and median duration of response (DoR) was 15.0 months (95% CI, 9.06–25.8). Among 21 patients who received crizotinib previously, the ORR was 33.3% (7 of 21; 95% CI, 14.6–57.0), median PFS was 6.73 months (95% CI, 4.73–8.54), and median DoR was 6.60 months (95% CI, 3.77–13.3). Conclusions In this study, conteltinib showed manageable safety profile, favorable PK properties, and anti-tumor activity in advanced ALK-positive NSCLC patients. The recommended phase 2 dose was determined to be 600 mg QD for ALK TKI-naïve patients and 300 mg bis in die (BID) for patients who received crizotinib previously. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02695550.

Abstract Background Adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) is considered for high‐risk patients in stage IB lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD). However, these risk factors are recognized as negative prognostic factors, not as predictors of ACT efficacy. This study aimed to analyze the efficacy of ACT in stage IB patients by retrospectively examining patients who had recurrence. Methods We reviewed 1399 patients with stage IB (American Joint Committee on Cancer 7th edition) LUAD from 2012 to 2017 in our institution and found 147 patients with recurrence. The last follow‐up date was December 30, 2021. One‐to‐one propensity‐score matching (PSM) was used to reduce the potential selection bias. Results Fifty‐five (37.4%) patients had received ACT and 92 (62.6%) had not (non‐ACT). Patients with ACT were younger (p

Abstract Introduction EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are associated with a poor response to immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), and only 20% of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations benefit from immunotherapy. Novel biomarkers or therapeutics are needed to predict NSCLC prognosis and enhance the efficacy of ICIs in NSCLC patients harboring EGFR mutations, especially lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) patients, who account for approximately 40–50% of all NSCLC cases. Methods An ARID1A-knockdown (ARID1A-KD) EGFR-mutant LUAD cell line was constructed using lentivirus. RNA-seq and mass spectrometry were performed. Western blotting and IHC were used for protein expression evaluation. Effects of 3-MA and rapamycin on cells were explored. Immunofluorescence assays were used for immune cell infiltration examination. Results ARID1A expression was negatively associated with immune cell infiltration and immune scores for ICIs in LUAD with EGFR mutations. In vitro experiments suggested that ARID1A-KD activates the EGFR/PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway and inhibits autophagy, which attenuates the inhibition of Rig-I-like receptor pathway activity and type I interferon production in EGFR-mutant LUAD cells. In addition, 3-MA upregulated production of type I interferon in EGFR-mutant LUAD cells, with an similar effect to ARID1A-KD. On the other hand, rapamycin attenuated the enhanced production of type I interferon in ARID1A-KD EGFR-mutant LUAD cells. ARID1A function appears to influence the tumor immune microenvironment and response to ICIs. Conclusion ARID1A deficiency reverses response to ICIs in EGFR-mutant LUAD by enhancing autophagy-inhibited type I interferon production. Video Abstract

Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) is generally considered a 'homogenous' disease, with little documented inter-tumor heterogeneity in treatment guidance or prognosis evaluation. The precise identification of clinically relevant molecular subtypes remains incomplete and their translation into clinical practice is limited. In this retrospective cohort study, we comprehensively characterized the immune microenvironment in SCLC by integrating transcriptional and protein profiling of formalin-fixation-and-paraffin-embedded (FFPE) samples from 29 patients. We identified two distinct disease subtypes: immune-enriched (IE-subtype) and immune-deprived (ID-subtype), displaying heterogeneity in immunological, biological, and clinical features. The IE-subtype was characterized by abundant immune infiltrate and elevated levels of interferon-alpha/gamma (IFNα/IFNγ) and inflammatory response, while the ID-subtype featured a complete lack of immune infiltration and a more proliferative phenotype. These two immune subtypes are associated with clinical benefits in SCLC patients treated with adjuvant therapy, with the IE-subtype exhibiting a more favorable response leading to improved survival and reduced disease recurrence risk. Additionally, we identified and validated a personalized prognosticator of immunophenotyping, the CCL5/CXCL9 chemokine index (CCI), using machine learning. The CCI demonstrated superior predictive abilities for prognosis and clinical benefits in SCLC patients, validated in our institute immunohistochemistry cohort and multicenter bulk transcriptomic data cohorts. In conclusion, our study provides a comprehensive and multi-dimensional characterization of the immune architecture of SCLC using clinical FFPE samples and proposes a new immune subtyping conceptual framework enabling risk stratification and the appropriate selection of individualized therapy.

Abstract Objective Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring proves to be a promising approach to assess response and predict survival in epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐mutated non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients treated with tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, whether the dynamic changes in ctDNA EGFR mutation status have the same predictive value as ctDNA remains unknown. This study aims to explore the predictive value of dynamic changes in both ctDNA and ctDNA EGFR status. Methods A retrospective analysis was performed using 91 ctDNA samples from a cohort of 28 patients who were diagnosed with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC and treated with EGFR‐TKIs, including 14 patients treated with first‐/second‐generation TKIs and 14 treated with osimertinib. Blood samples at baseline (BL), within 4 weeks after TKI initiation (Week4), within 12 weeks before progression (pre‐PD), and at progression were collected. The relationship alternatives in ctDNA status, ctDNA EGFR status and response to EGFR‐TKIs as well as progression‐free survival (PFS) were analyzed. Results We categorized 20 BL‐ctDNA positive patients with available Week4‐ctDNA into two groups: ctDNA‐clearance (N = 7, 35%) and ctDNA‐non‐clearance (N = 13, 65%). The ctDNA‐clearance group had better PFS than the ctDNA‐non‐clearance group (ctDNA‐clearance vs. ctDNA‐non‐clearance, p = 0.091, hazard ratio [HR] = 0.42, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.15–1.19). According to Week4‐EGFR status, we observed that PFS was significantly longer in EGFR‐clearance patients than EGFR‐non‐clearance groups, (p = 0.011, HR = 0.23, 95% CI = 0.08–0.72). We then categorized patients into three subgroups according to Week4‐ctDNA and Week4‐EGFR status: non‐clearance (N = 9), only‐EGFR‐clearance (concomitant alterations non‐clearance) (N = 4), and all‐clearance (N = 7). The nonclearance group had a significantly worse PFS than the all‐clearance group (median PFS = 5.07 vs. 11.40 months, p = 0.029, HR = 3.45, 95% CI = 1.05–11.49). The only‐EGFR‐clearance group had a similar PFS to the all‐clearance group (p = 0.607), which was longer than that of the non‐clearance group (median PFS = 9.20 vs. 5.07 months, p = 0.060, HR = 0.25, 95% CI = 0.05–1.18). We found that the all‐clearance group had a similar objective response rate (ORR) to the only‐EGFR‐clearance group (p = 1.000) and a higher ORR than the non‐clearance group (p = 0.012). Conclusion Monitoring of EGFR clearance in ctDNA is promising and cost‐effective in assessing response and predicting survival in EGFR‐mutated NSCLC patients treated with EGFR‐TKIs, with similar predictive value to ctDNA surveillance.

Abstract Background Although targeted agents have been gradually applied in the treatment of HER2-mutated non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in recent years, patients’ therapeutic demands are far from being met. PATHER2 was the first phase 2 trial to explore the efficacy and safety of the HER2-targeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) pyrotinib plus the antiangiogenic agent apatinib in previously treated HER2-altered metastatic NSCLC patients. Methods HER2-mutated or HER2-amplified metastatic NSCLC patients who had failed at least first-line chemotherapy or HER2-targeted TKIs received oral pyrotinib 400 mg plus apatinib 250 mg once daily until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was the investigator-assessed objective response rate (ORR). Results Between March 2019 and December 2020, 33 patients were enrolled; 13 (39.4%) presented brain metastases, and 16 (48.5%) had received at least two lines of prior chemotherapy or HER2-targeted TKIs. As of September 20, 2021, the median follow-up duration was 11.3 (range, 3.5–26.0) months. The investigator-assessed ORR was 51.5% (17/33; 95% CI, 33.5 to 69.2%), and the disease control rate was 93.9% (31/33; 95% CI, 79.8 to 99.3%). The median duration of response, progression-free survival, and overall survival were 6.0 (95% CI, 4.4 to 8.6) months, 6.9 (95% CI, 5.8 to 8.5) months, and 14.8 (95% CI, 10.4 to 23.8) months, respectively. The most frequent grade ≥ 3 treatment-related adverse events included diarrhea (3.0%) and hypertension (9.1%). No treatment-related deaths were reported. Conclusions Pyrotinib plus apatinib demonstrated promising antitumor activity and a manageable safety profile in HER2-mutated or HER2-amplified metastatic NSCLC patients. Trial registration Chinese Clinical Trial Registry Identifier: ChiCTR1900021684 .

Abstract Objective Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) are the current standard of care for advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients harboring EGFR activating mutations. However, the optimal strategy for elderly NSCLC patients is still under debate. This study was designed to explore the optimal first-line regimens by comparing diverse strategies for elderly and non-elderly EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients. Methods A systematic review was conducted to summarize all available randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases, and international conferences before September 30, 2020. The primary outcome was progression free survival (PFS), and the secondary outcome was overall survival (OS). A network meta-analysis (NMA) was constructed using the Bayesian statistical model to synthesize the survival outcomes of all the treatments. Results In total, 12 RCTs were deemed eligible for inclusion with 3779 patients who have received 10 diverse treatments including EGFR-TKIs. Results from the Bayesian ranking suggested that osimertinib was most likely to rank the first in overall population and in elderly patients in PFS, with the cumulative probabilities of 42.20% and 31.46%, respectively. In non-elderly group (younger than 65 years old), standard of care (SoC, representing first-generation EGFR-TKIs in this NMA) + chemotherapy ranked the first (31.66%). As for OS, SoC + chemotherapy ranked first in all patients (64.33%), patients younger than 65 years old (61.98%), or older than 65 years old (34.45%). Conclusion The regimen of osimertinib is associated with the most favorable PFS in elderly advanced EGFR-mutated NSCLC patients, while SoC + chemotherapy is the optimal strategy in PFS for non-elderly NSCLC patients harboring EGFR activating mutations, and in OS for both elderly and non-elderly EGFR-mutated advanced NSCLC patients. Trial registration INPLASY protocol 2020100061 https://doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2020.20.0061 .

Abstract Objective Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is one of the most aggressive malignancies characterized by neuroendocrine (NE) differentiation. The Delta‐like protein 3 (DLL3), as a direct downstream target of ASCL1, is involved in NE differentiation and carcinogenesis of SCLC. This study aims to investigate the relationship between ASCL1 and DLL3 expressions and their clinicopathological implications in SCLC. Methods A total of 247 surgically resected pure SCLC samples with limited clinical stage and follow‐up data were retrieved in this retrospective study. ASCL1 and DLL3 protein expression was detected by immunohistochemistry staining. The correlations between ASCL1 and DLL3 expressions, as well as their clinicopathological features, were analyzed by χ2 tests. Disease‐free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) in SCLC patients with ASCL1/DLL3 low and high expressions were compared by the Kaplan‐Meier method and log‐rank tests. Results ASCL1 high expression was detected in 105 (42.5%) patients. Its expression was positively correlated with the clinical stage (p = 0.02) and nerve invasion (p = 0.03). DLL3 high expression was observed in 188 (72.8%) patients and was correlated with vascular invasion (p = 0.04). ASCL1 expression was positively associated with DLL3 expression (p = 0.03). In addition, DLL3 expression has a strong correlation with the expression of thyroid transcription factor‐1 (TTF1) and conventional NE markers. Conclusion ASCL1 and DLL3 were highly expressed in SCLC tumor samples, and a positive correlation between these two markers was observed. Co‐analysis of ASCL1 and DLL3 may identify a distinct SCLC subgroup benefit from targeted therapy. Therefore, ASCL1 and DLL3 could be potential biomarkers served for the selection of related patients.

Abstract Background There is a need for the development of therapies to delay cancer progression and prolong survival after initial chemotherapy for the treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Since apatinib has been found to exert promising effects on cancer patients after standard first‐line chemotherapy, this study aimed to investigate apatinib as a maintenance treatment following first‐line chemotherapy in extensive disease (ED)‐SCLC. Methods The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression‐free survival (PFS). The secondary endpoints included toxicity and safety. Apatinib (250 mg/day) was administered during the chemotherapy interval and as maintenance therapy after 4–6 cycles until the patient's disease progressed, the patient died, or became intolerant to the drug's toxicity. Results The patients who received apatinib maintenance treatment had a median PFS of 3.7 months (95% CI: 1.3–6.2 months). The median OS was 16.3 months (95% CI: 9.7–22.8 months). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 50.0% and 66.7%, respectively. Two patients required dose reduction due to adverse effects (AEs). The most common AEs included hypertension (n = 4, 33.3%) and hand‐foot‐skin reaction (n = 2, 16.7%). One patient developed diarrhea, while another patient developed hemoptysis. The most serious AE was intestinal obstruction. Conclusions Apatinib maintenance therapy showed promising efficacy and safety to extend the OS/PFS of patients with ED‐SCLC, thus making it a potent therapeutic option in future clinical practice. Given the small sample size of this study, further studies with large sample sizes are needed to validate the findings of the present study.

Abstract Background Central nervous system (CNS) metastases in patients with ALK-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are a cause of substantial morbidity and mortality. Although alectinib had demonstrated promising intracranial efficacy in several clinical trials, data were limited on its CNS activity in real-world settings. Methods In this retrospective study, ALK-positive NSCLC patients with brain metastases (BM) or leptomeningeal metastases (LM) from six hospitals in China were divided into three cohorts based on the treatment history before the administration of alectinib. ALK-TKI-naive patients were enrolled in cohort 1, cohort 2 included patients who experienced intracranial progression with or without extracranial progression after treatment with crizotinib, and cohort 3 included patients who developed progression only in CNS following treatment with other second-generation ALK-TKIs. The definition and evaluation of intracranial and extracranial lesions were based on Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors version 1.1. Results Sixty-five patients were eligible and included in our study (cohort 1: 20, cohort 2: 32, cohort 3: 13). For the overall population and patients with uncontrolled CNS metastases, similar intracranial response in CNS target lesions was observed: cohort 1: 81.8% and 80%; cohort 2: 76.5% and 86.7%; cohort 3: 42.8% and 33.3%. For patients in these three cohorts, 75% (6/8), 78.6% (11/14), and 83.3% (5/6) were reported to have significant improvement in CNS-related symptoms respectively. The number of patients who were in need of mannitol or corticosteroids decreased remarkably after the treatment of alectinib (p

Abstract Background There is limited data on the clinical outcome, long‐term survival and tolerability of sequential therapy of first‐line crizotinib followed by alectinib in a real‐world setting for Chinese patients with advanced ALK+ NSCLC. Methods The medical records of patients who received sequential therapy with first‐line crizotinib followed by alectinib (no intermittent systemic therapy was allowed between the two ALK‐TKIs) were collected from six centers in China. Combined time treatment to failure (C‐TTF) was defined as the period from the start of crizotinib to the complete discontinuation of alectinib due to any cause. Results A total of 61 patients were included in our study. Fifty‐two patients were switched to alectinib due to disease progression, seven as a result of toxicity, and two due to patient preference. At the time of data cutoff, alectinib treatment was discontinued in 31 patients on account of disease progression while severe adverse events resulted in cessation of alectinib in another two patients. Rebiopsy was conducted in 21 patients following disease progression on alectinib in whom ALK secondary mutation was found in 13 patients. Patients with ALK secondary mutation demonstrated better PFS during treatment with subsequent ALK‐TKIs compared with those without (10.4 vs. 3.1 m, p = 0.0018, HR = 0.08). With a median follow‐up of 34.3 months, C‐TTF was 39.2 months and estimated 5‐year OS was 68.6% in the overall population. Conclusion Sequential therapy with first‐line crizotinib followed by alectinib demonstrated long‐term benefits. Different efficacy in subsequent ALK‐TKI between patients with or without ALK secondary mutation further emphasized the importance of rebiopsy to guide targeted therapy more precisely.

Abstract Background Dacomitinib is a second‐generation epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) which is superior to first‐generation EGFR TKI in ARCHER 1050. However, the activity of dacomitinib in the central nervous system (CNS) is not known as ARCHER 1050 did not include patients with baseline brain metastases. This study aimed to describe dacomitinib's activity in the CNS in a real‐world setting. Patients and Methods Thirty‐two patients who were receiving dacomitinib for advanced non‐small‐cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations and brain metastasis were included in this study. Patients who received prior EGFR TKIs were excluded from this trial. Case report forms were collected to determine treatment outcomes. Results Among 32 patients with EGFR‐mutated NSCLC and brain disease, eight were included in the CNS evaluable for response group. The intracranial objective response rate (iORR) was 87.5% (95% confidence interval [CI] 47.3–99.7%) and the intracranial disease control rate (iDCR) was 100% (95% CI 63.1–100%). In 30 evaluable patients with measurable or nonmeasurable brain lesions, the iORR was 66.7% (95% CI 47.2–82.7%) and the iDCR was 100% (95% CI 88.4–100%). Median intracranial duration of response (iDoR) and intracranial progression‐free survival (iPFS) were not reached, with a one‐year iDoR rate of 72.2% (95% CI 48.7–95.7%) and a 1‐year iPFS rate of 71.2% (95% CI 51.0–91.4%), respectively. The majority of patients experienced low‐grade (G1/2) toxicities, which are reversible. Conclusion This study suggests that dacomitinib demonstrated CNS efficacy in patients with EGFR TKI‐naïve EGFR‐mutated NSCLC in the real‐world setting. The safety profile was tolerable and manageable.

Abstract Background Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) have improved the prognosis of mutant lung cancer; however, the clinical application value of TKIs for nonclassical EGFR mutation is unclear, especially for patients with rare uncommon mutations. Methods A retrospective study based on electronic medical records was conducted to collect data on the effectiveness of afatinib in patients with stage IIIB/IV lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) bearing uncommon mutations between January 2017 and January 2021. Results Forty‐two patients with uncommon mutations treated with afatinib were enrolled. The objective response rate (ORR) was 50.0% (10 of 20 patients). The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 11.7 months (95% confidence interval = 8.5–18.3 months). Of the 42 patients, the median TTF was 15.0, 11.7, and 16.6 months in patients with Gly719Xaa (G719X), Ser768Ile (S768I), and Leu861Gln (L861Q) mutations, respectively. In patients with the rare uncommon mutation, the median TTF was 10.0 months, and the ORR was 50.0%. Afatinib demonstrated clinical activity across a set type of specific rare uncommon mutations, including EGFR L747P, A767_V769dup, and L833V/H835L, with a case having a TTF of more than 1 year. Molecular profiling reports of 16 afatinib‐resistant biopsy samples were available, and the secondary T790M mutation was detected in one patient with L833V/H835L mutation and one harboring S768I/L858R mutation. Conclusions Our findings suggested that afatinib is effective in patients with uncommon mutations. Mechanisms of afatinib resistance vary and need further investigation.

Abstract Background Transformation to small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a resistance mechanism of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutant lung adenocarcinoma (LADC) patients treated with EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). Here, we describe the clinical characteristics and prognosis of these patients and explore the treatment modes after transformation. Methods EGFR‐mutant LADC patients with SCLC transformation were retrospectively included in the study. Demographic and clinical data were collected. Survival outcomes and corresponding influential factors were analyzed. Results Twenty‐nine patients were included in the study. The median progression‐free survival (PFS) of patients who received first‐line EGFR‐TKIs was 13.1 months. The median time to SCLC transformation was 27.5 months. After transformation, the objective response rates of patients who received first‐line chemotherapy with or without EGFR‐TKIs were 43.8% and 37.5%, respectively. The median PFS of patients reveiving chemotherapy with EGFR‐TKIs was significantly longer than that of patients receiving chemotherapy without EGFR‐TKIs (5.2 vs. 3.0 months; HR, 0.19; 95% CI: 0.05–0.72; p = 0.014). However, there was no significant difference in median overall survival (OS) between patients who received chemotherapy with or without EGFR‐TKIs (14.8 vs. 13.0 months; p = 0.474). In the multivariate Cox proportional hazards regression analysis, both anti‐angiogenic treatment (HR, 0.04; 95% CI: 0.01–0.29; p = 0.001) and local radiotherapy (HR, 0.28; 95% CI: 0.08–0.97; p = 0.044) were significantly associated with better patient OS after transformation. Conclusions Compared with chemotherapy alone, the combination of chemotherapy and EGFR‐TKIs as first‐line treatment after SCLC transformation can benefit patients in PFS but not in OS. However, anti‐angiogenic therapies and local radiotherapy can significantly prolong OS after transformation.

Abstract Background For advanced nonsquamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the mechanisms of resistance to first‐line immunotherapy are not clear. Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in combination with agents targeting other pathways may serve as second‐line therapy options. Apatinib (a vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor) could increase the efficacy of camrelizumab (an ICI agent). The efficacy and safety of this combination regimen as a second‐line therapy for NSCLC patients after failure on first‐line immunotherapy has not previously been evaluated. Methods In this single‐arm, multicenter, phase II trial, metastatic nonsquamous NSCLC patients previously treated with single‐agent ICI or ICI plus chemotherapy will be enrolled. Participants will receive intravenous camrelizumab 200 mg D1 and oral apatinib 250 mg D1‐21 for a 21‐day cycle. The study treatment will continue until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint is progression‐free survival by investigator. Secondary endpoints are overall survival, objective response rate, disease control rate, duration of response by investigator, quality of life, safety, and toxicity. Conclusions This trial will provide evidence of the benefit of treatment with camrelizumab combined with apatinib in advanced nonsquamous NSCLC patients who were previously treated with first‐line immunotherapy.

Abstract ARID1A is a key component of the SWI/SNF chromatin remodeling complexes which is important for the maintaining of biological processes of cells. Recent studies had uncovered the potential role of ARID1A alterations or expression loss in the therapeutic sensitivity of cancers, but the studies in this field requires to be further summarized and discussed. Therefore, we proposed a series of mechanisms related to the resistance to EGFR-TKIs induced by ARID1A alterations or expression loss and the potential therapeutic strategies to overcome the resistance based on published studies. It suggested that ARID1A alterations or expression loss might be the regulators in PI3K/Akt, JAK/STAT and NF-κB signaling pathways which are strongly associated with the resistance to EGFR-TKIs in NSCLC patients harboring sensitive EGFR mutations. Besides, ARID1A alterations or expression loss could lead to the resistance to EGFR-TKIs via a variety of processes during the tumorigenesis and development of cancers, including epithelial to mesenchymal transition, angiogenesis and the inhibition of apoptosis. Based on the potential mechanisms related to ARID1A, we summarized that the small molecular inhibitors targeting ARID1A or PI3K/Akt pathway, the anti-angiogenic therapy and immune checkpoint inhibitors could be used for the supplementary treatment for EGFR-TKIs among NSCLC patients harboring the concomitant alterations of sensitive EGFR mutations and ARID1A.

BackgroundBrigatinib is a central nervous system-active second-generation anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) inhibitor that targets a broad range of ALK rearrangements in patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). The current study aimed to analyze the pooled effects and adverse events of brigatinib in patients with ALK-positive NSCLC.MethodsThe pooled estimates and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated with DerSimonian-Laird method and the random effect model.ResultsThe pooled objective response rate (ORR) and disease control rate (DCR) of brigatinib were 64% (95% CI 45%-83%) and 88% (95% CI 80%-96%), respectively. The pooled mPFS was 10.52 months (95% CI 7.66-13.37). In the subgroup analyses by treatment line, the highest mPFS was reached in first-line treatment (24.00 months, 95% CI 18.40-43.20), followed by post-crizotinib second-line treatment (mPFS=16.26 months, 95% CI 12.87-19.65), and second-line with any prior ALK tyrosine kinase inhibitors (mPFS=12.96 months, 95% CI 11.14-14.78). Among patients with any baseline brain metastases, the pooled intracranial ORR (iORR) was estimated as 54% (95% CI 35%-73%) for any treatment line, and 60% (95% CI 39%-81%) for first-line treatment. Intracranial PFS (iPFS) reached 19.26 months (95% CI 14.82-23.70) in patients with any baseline brain metastases. Creatine phosphokinase (CPK) increased (44%, 95% CI 26%-63%), diarrhea (37%, 95% CI 27%-48%), and nausea (28%, 95% CI 17%-39%) of any grade were the most common adverse events.ConclusionBrigatinib is effective in the treatment of patients with ALK-positive NSCLC, particularly showing robust intracranial PFS. Brigatinib used as first-line treatment yielded superior PFS compared with brigatinib used as other treatment lines. These results suggested a benefit of using brigatinib earlier in the patient’s management. All adverse events are manageable, with CPK increased and gastrointestinal reactions found to be the most common types.Systematic Review Registrationhttps://inplasy.com/inplasy-2022-3-0142/, identifier (INPLASY202230141).

Background: YAP1 (Yes-associated protein 1), an important effector of the Hippo pathway, acts as an oncogene and is overexpressed in various malignant tumors. However, the function and expression pattern of YAP1 in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) have not been systematically established. This study aimed to explore the relationship between YAP1 expression and neuroendocrine differentiation markers and their prognostic significance in LCNEC. Materials and methods: YAP1 protein and neuroendocrine markers (INSM1, NeuroD1 and DLL3) expression were examined by immunohistochemical (IHC) staining in 80 resected pulmonary LCNEC cases. The possible association between these markers and clinicopathological features was evaluated and survival analyses were performed. Results: YAP1 was highly expressed in 25% LCNECs (20/80) , especially at a relatively higher T stage (p = 0.015). YAP1 expression was negatively correlated with INSM1 (χ2=11.53, p = 0.001) and DLL3(χ2=8.55, p = 0.004), but not with NeuroD1 (p = 0.482). For survival analyses, YAP1 expression was associated with worse disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) (median DFS: 13 months vs. not reached (NR), p = 0.0096; median OS: not reached, NR vs. NR, p = 0.038), and was an unfavorable prognostic factor for DFS (HR:3.285; 95%CI: 1.526-7.071, p = 0.002) and OS (HR: 2.864, 95% CI: 0.932-8.796, p = 0.066). Conclusions: YAP1 was found to be conversely correlated with neuroendocrine markers and a prognostic factor for worse survival in resected LCNEC patients, and mechanisms need to be further investigated.

Abstract Background Previous studies have demonstrated that PD‐1 inhibitors are effective in the treatment of advanced or metastatic non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, whether the combination of PD‐1 inhibitors and antiangiogenic agents benefit advanced NSCLC patients as subsequent therapy remains unknown. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety profile of this combination strategy as subsequent therapy for NSCLC patients in a real‐world setting. Methods A total of 30 patients with advanced NSCLC, who progressed after at least two cycles of platinum‐based chemotherapy or targeted therapy and subsequently received combination therapy with a PD‐1 inhibitor and antiangiogenic agent, were included in this study. The safety profile and efficacy were also investigated. Results At the time of a median follow‐up period of 10.7 months, 28 patients had experienced progression of disease and 16 patients had died. The median progression‐free survial (mPFS) was 5.0 months (95% confidence interval [CI]: 3.179–6.821), and the median overall survival (mOS) was 14.3 months (95% CI: 8.912–19.659). The objective response rate (ORR) and the disease control rate (DCR) were 10.3% and 72.4%, respectively (0 complete remission, three partial responses and 18 stable disease in 29 patients with measurable lesions). Patients with PD‐L1 expression of at least 1% of tumor cells (n = 5) had relatively longer mPFS compared to those with PD‐L1‐negative tumors (n = 14), (11.6 months vs. 3.7 months). Treatment was suspended in two patients due to grade 3 immune‐related pneumonia and pancreatitis, respectively. No novel adverse events (AEs) or grade 4 AEs were observed. Conclusions A combination of PD‐1 inhibitors and antiangiogenic targeting agents may be beneficial for patients with advanced or metastatic NSCLC as subsequent treatment, especially for patients with PD‐L1 protein expression positive, and treatment is well tolerated.

Abstract Background Previous studies have demonstrated the preclinical pharmacological and toxicological consistency, and clinical pharmacokinetic equivalence of bevacizumab biosimilar LY01008 with reference bevacizumab (Avastin). This randomized controlled trial aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of LY01008 with Avastin in first‐line treatment of Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent non‐squamous non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Methods Stage IIIB‐IV NSCLC patients with evaluable lesions, good physical status, and adequate organ functions from 67 centers across China were randomized in a ratio of 1:1 to receive LY01008 or Avastin 15 mg/kg intravenously in combination with paclitaxel/carboplatin (combined treatment) for 4‐6 cycles, followed by maintenance monotherapy with LY01008 until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or death. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) in accordance with Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1 confirmed by independent radiological review committees (IRRC). Secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression‐free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and safety. This study was registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03533127). Results Between December 15th, 2017, and May 15th, 2019, a total of 649 patients were randomized to the LY01008 (n = 324) or Avastin (n = 325) group. As of September 25th, 2019 for primary endpoint analysis, 589 patients received ORR evaluation, with a median number of combined treatment cycles of 5 (range 1‐6) and median duration of treatment of 3.0 (range 0.0‐5.1) months. ORR of response‐evaluable patients in the LY01008 and Avastin groups were 48.5% and 53.0%, respectively. The stratified ORR ratio was 0.91 (90% CI 0.80‐1.04, within the prespecified equivalence margin of 0.75‐1.33). Up to May 15th, 2020, with a median follow‐up of 13.6 (range 0.8‐28.4) months, no notable differences in DCR, median DoR, median PFS, median OS, and 1‐year OS rate were observed between the LY01008 and Avastin groups. There were no clinically meaningful differences in safety and immunogenicity across treatment groups. Conclusions LY01008 demonstrated similarity to Avastin in terms of efficacy and safety in Chinese patients with advanced or recurrent non‐squamous NSCLC. LY01008 combined with paclitaxel/carboplatin is expected to become a new treatment option for unresectable, metastatic, or recurrent non‐squamous NSCLC patients in the first‐line setting.

Abstract Background Previous studies have demonstrated the combination of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)‐tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and other antitumor agents may delay drug resistance. In this study, we retrospectively reviewed the efficacy and safety of first‐line concurrent EGFR‐TKIs and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without an antiangiogenic agent for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients in the real world. Methods A total of 30 patients with advanced lung adenocarcinoma and activating EGFR mutations concurrently received an EGFR‐TKI and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab. The safety profile and efficacy were retrospectively reviewed. Results At the median follow‐up time of 22.1 months, 18 patients had experienced disease progression, and six patients had died because of disease. The median progression‐free survival (mPFS) was 21.2 months (95% CI: 12.631–29.798). Of the 28 patients who had measurable lesions, the objective response rate and disease control rate were 71.4% and 96.4%, respectively (one patient achieved complete remission, 19 patients had a partial response and seven patients had stable disease). Male patients had significantly longer mPFS than female patients (32.6 vs. 14.6 months, HR = 3.593, 95% CI: 1.158–11.148, p = 0.027). The most frequently seen grade 3/4 adverse events were hematological toxicities, seen in three cases (10%). Three patients ceased bevacizumab due to vascular events, including hypertension (grade 2, 6.7%) and venous thrombosis (grade 2, 3.3%), and continued EGFR‐TKI and platinum‐based doublet chemotherapy. Conclusions The combination of first‐generation EGFR‐TKIs with platinum‐based chemotherapy may be a first‐line treatment for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients harboring activated EGFR mutations and is well tolerated.

Background: Approximately 10% of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor uncommon epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) alterations. This study aims to investigate the therapeutic responses and predict the binding activity of different tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) for EGFR uncommon alterations.Methods: Between May 2014 and June 2021, clinical outcomes of NSCLC patients harboring EGFR uncommon alterations who received diverse treatment modalities: first-generation (1G) EGFR-TKI, second-generation (2G) EGFR-TKI afatinib, chemotherapy, and 1G TKI in combination with chemotherapy as the initial therapy were retrospectively analyzed, and structural analysis for the binding activity of major uncommon subtypes G719A, S768I, and L861Q to different TKIs were predicted.Results: A total of 102 NSCLC patients harboring EGFR uncommon alterations with treatment and survival outcomes were included and analyzed. The majority of patients presented compound mutations (54.9%), and G719X plus S768I was the predominant subtype (n = 33, 32.3%). There was a significant difference in median progression-free survival (mPFS) between therapeutic patterns (p = 0.015) and EGFR alteration subtypes (p = 0.017). Rather than almonertinib and furmonertinib, afatinib, dacomitinib and osimertinib revealed favorable binding activity to G719A mutation. In contrast, S768I and L861Q mutation indicated an unaffected binding activity to these diverse kinds of EGFR TKIs.Conclusion: Together with afatinib, 1G-TKIs combined with chemotherapy might be another effective option for NSCLC patients harboring EGFR uncommon alterations. Based on computational findings, afatinib, dacomitinib, and osimertinib might confer favorable activity to G719A, S768I, and L861Q, whereas almonertinib and furmonertinib revealed less activity to G719A.

EGFR mutations are the most important drivers of gene alterations in lung adenocarcinomas and are sensitive to EGFR-TKIs. However, resistance to EGFR-TKIs is inevitable in the majority of EGFR-mutated lung cancer patients. Numerous resistant mechanisms have been revealed to date, and more are still under investigation. Owing to the selective pressure, intratumoral heterogeneity may exist after resistance, especially in patients after multiple lines of treatment. For those patients, it is important to choose therapies focused on the trunk/major clone of the tumor in order to achieve optimal clinical benefit. Here, we will report an EGFR-mutated lung adenocarcinoma patient with heterogeneity of resistant mechanisms including EGFR amplification, large fragment deletion of RB1, and histological transformations after targeted treatments. In our case, EGFR amplification seemed to be the major clone of the resistant mechanism according to the next-generation sequencing (NGS) results of both liquid biopsy monitoring and tissue biopsies. In consideration of the high EGFR amplification level, the patient was administered by combination treatment with EGFR-TKI plus nimotuzumab, an anti-EGFR monoclonal antibody (mAb), and achieved a certain degree of clinical benefit. Our case sheds light on the treatment of EGFR-mutant patients with EGFR amplification and indicates that a combination of EGFR-TKI with anti-EGFR mAb might be one of the possible treatment options based on genetic tests. Moreover, the decision on therapeutic approaches should focus on the major clone of the tumor and should make timely adjustments according to the dynamic changes of genetic characteristics during treatment.

Background: The roles of cancer stem cells (CSCs) and epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) in solid tumors are well established. However, the interaction between CSCs and EMT in pulmonary large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) remains unknown. The aim of this study was to investigate the expression and clinical significance of a CSC marker (ALDH1A1) and its correlation with Epithelial-like phenotype marker (E-cadherin) and Mesenchymal-like phenotype marker (N-cadherin) in LCNEC patients. Methods: Immunohistochemistry (IHC) for ALDH1A1, E-cadherin and N-cadherin expression was conducted on tissue microarrays made from 79 resected LCNEC patient samples. ALDH1A1 protein expression was evaluated by the IHC score, and its correlations with the expression of E-cadherin, N-cadherin and clinicopathological features were determined based on IHC data. Survival analyses were also performed. Results: ALDH1A1 was positively expressed in 75.9% (60/79 cases) of LCNEC patients. No significant difference in clinicopathological variables was observed between the ALDH1A1-negative and ALDH1A1-positive groups. However, ALDH1A1 expression was positively correlated with E-cadherin (Spearman's rho = 0.229, p-value = 0.007), which represents the epithelial-like phenotype, but not with N-cadherin. Patients with expression of ALDH1A1 had significantly longer disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS) than those who were ALDH1A1 negative (median DFS: 52 vs 12 months, p = 0.028; median OS: not reached; p = 0.027). Multivariate analysis showed that ALDH1A1 was an independent favorable prognostic factor for DFS (p = 0.032, HR: 0.438, 95% CI: 0.206–0.932) and OS (p = 0.025, HR: 0.279, 95% CI: 0.091–0.852) in LCNEC patients. Conclusion: This study suggests that ALDH1A1 can act as a favorable independent prognostic factor for LCNEC, which related to the epithelioid phenotype in EMT, and its internal mechanism needs further study.

IntroductionLeptomeningeal metastasis (LM) commonly occurs in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients and has a poor prognosis. Due to limited access to leptomeningeal lesions, the genetic characteristics of LM have not been explored to date. Cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be the most representative liquid biopsy medium to obtain genomic information from LM in NSCLC.MethodsCSF biopsies and matched peripheral blood biopsies were collected from 33 NSCLC patients with LM. We profiled genetic alterations from LM by comparing CSF cell-free DNA (cfDNA) with plasma cfDNA. Somatic mutations were examined using targeted sequencing. Genomic instability was analyzed by low-coverage whole-genome sequencing (WGS).ResultsDriver mutations were detected in 100% of CSF cfDNA with much higher variant allele frequency than that in matched plasma cfDNA (57.5%). Furthermore, we found that the proportions of CSF cfDNA fragments below 150 bp were significantly higher than those in plasma cfDNA. These findings indicate enrichment of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) in CSF and explain the high sensitivity of mutation detection in the CSF. The absence of some mutations in CSF cfDNA—especially the first-/second-generation mutation T790M, which confers resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-Tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs)—that were present in plasma cfDNA samples indicates different mechanisms of cancer evolution between LM and extracranial lesions. In addition, 86.6% of CSF ctDNA samples revealed high levels of genomic instability compared with 2.5% in plasma cfDNA samples. A higher number of large-scale state transitions (LSTs) in CSF cfDNA were associated with a shorter overall survival (OS).ConclusionOur results suggest that LM and extracranial lesions develop independently. Both CSF cfDNA genetic profiling and plasma cfDNA genetic profiling are necessary for clinical decision-making for NSCLC patients with LM. Through CSF-based low-coverage WGS, a high level of LSTs was identified as a potential biomarker of poor prognosis.

Chemotherapy-induced neutropenia (CIN) is a potentially fatal and common complication in myelosuppressive chemotherapy. The timing and grade of CIN may play prognostic and predictive roles in cancer therapy. CIN is associated with older age, poor functional and nutritional status, the presence of significant comorbidities, the type of cancer, previous chemotherapy cycles, the stage of the disease, specific chemotherapy regimens, and combined therapies. There are many key points and new challenges in the management of CIN in adults including: (1) Genetic risk factors to evaluate the patient’s risk for CIN remain unclear. However, these risk factors urgently need to be identified. (2) Febrile neutropenia (FN) remains one of the most common reasons for oncological emergency. No consensus nomogram for FN risk assessment has been established. (3) Different assessment tools [e.g., Multinational Association for Supportive Care in Cancer (MASCC), the Clinical Index of Stable Febrile Neutropenia (CISNE) score model, and other tools] have been suggested to help stratify the risk of complications in patients with FN. However, current tools have limitations. The CISNE score model is useful to support decision-making, especially for patients with stable FN. (4) There are still some challenges, including the benefits of granulocyte colony stimulating factor treatment and the optimal antibiotic regimen in emergency management of FN. In view of the current reports, our group discusses the key points, new challenges, and management of CIN.

Background Histologically, SCLC are classified as pure (P‐SCLC) and combined subtypes (C‐SCLC). Currently, few studies compare the clinicopathological characteristics and explore the treatment strategies applied to them. Methods Between July 2005 and April 2016, the clinical records of 297 postoperative patients with pathologically confirmed SCLC were retrospectively analyzed. Kaplan‐Meier method and Cox regression model were separately used for stratified univariate and multivariate survival analysis. Results A total of 46 cases (15.5%) of C‐SCLCs and 251 cases (85.5%) of pure SCLCs (P‐SCLCs) were included in this study. The average age of C‐SCLCs was a little higher than that of P‐SCLCs (59.65 ± 8.72 vs. 56.56 ± 10.12; P = 0.053). More patients had a history of smoking in C‐SCLC (78.3% vs. 63.3%; P = 0.074). The five‐year overall survival (OS) rate for P‐SCLCs and C‐SCLCs was 65.1% and 56.7%, respectively (P = 0.683). For P‐SCLC, stage and an intervention of prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) were independent factors that affected OS. In C‐SCLCs cases, performing sublobectomy was an independent risk factor for poor prognosis. Conclusions We identified no significant difference in clinical characteristics and outcome between C‐SCLCs and P‐SCLCs. However, the factors affecting the prognosis of the two subtypes were slightly inconsistent. For C‐SCLCs, the extent of resection had a greater impact on survival, and lobectomy combined with systemic lymph node dissection should therefore be performed as extensively as possible. In addition, PCI was beneficial in improving the SCLC OS rate. Key points This study demonstrated the prognosis of C‐SCLCs did not significantly differ from that of P‐SCLCs, but was more susceptible to the extent of resection. Patients with C‐SCLC who underwent limited resection had a significantly increased risk of shorter OS. This study highlighted the importance of performing lobectomy for resectable C‐SCLC patients. This study also proved the benefit of PCI in improving the OS rate for both P‐SCLC and C‐SCLC patients.

Patients with lung adenocarcinoma (ADC) who harbor drive gene mutation will inevitably develop drug resistance after receiving targeted therapy. The common mechanisms of drug resistance include secondary mutation of driver gene, change of non-driver gene, histological transformation and epithelial mesenchymal transformation. Histological transformation includes the transformation from lung ADC to small cell lung cancer (SCLC), squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) and so on. Histological transformation not only has a negative impact on the quality of patients’ life, but also poses great challenges to the follow-up treatment of patients. However the mechanism of transformation is still incomplete. This article will review the research results on the mechanism of histological transformation and the selection of treatment strategies.

As a new method, immunotherapy which is targeting programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1) and programmed cell death ligand 1 (PD-L1) plays a more and more important role in the treatment of malignant tumors. Immunotherapy is more effective than traditional chemotherapy. However, there are also many adverse events during the application of immunocheckpoint inhibitors targeting PD-1/PD-L1, and the incidence rate of these adverse events among different drugs is different. Because the molecular structure of these drugs is an important indicator to distinguish them, this paper will analyze the correlation between molecular structure and adverse events of PD-1/PD-L1 immunocheckpoint inhibitors through reviewing some meta-analyses and retrospective analyses from the perspective of different structures.

Background: There have been no comprehensive large-scale studies that have evaluated the benefits of chemotherapy-based regimens in addressing HER2 -altered advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in a first-line setting. Data on HER2 alteration subtypes and concomitant alterations are also limited. Accordingly, our retrospective, real-world POLISH study assesses the efficacy of first-line chemotherapy alone (C) as well as combinations with immune checkpoint inhibitors (C + I) or angiogenesis inhibitors (C + A) for HER2 -altered NSCLC; molecular features are also reported. Methods: HER2 -altered NSCLC patients who received a first-line treatment between November 2015 and September 2021 were screened. Patients treated with C, C + I, or C + A were included in our final efficacy analysis. Progression-free survival (PFS) was compared between the subgroups. A Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) analysis was performed to evaluate concomitant alterations. Results: A total of 293 patients were screened, with an identification of HER2 amplification and 37 distinct HER2 mutations, and 210 cases treated with C, C + I, or C + A were ultimately included. C + A achieved longer PFS than C (5.63 vs 4.03 months, hazard ratio: 0.64, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.46–0.88, p = 0.006). C + I did not improve median PFS compared to C + A or C (both p > 0.05), despite the programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) expression or tumor mutational burden. KEGG analysis revealed that concomitant upregulation of PI3 K/AKT pathway signaling was common in HER2 -altered NSCLC. Conclusion: Chemotherapy plus angiogenesis inhibitors may yield a greater survival benefit than chemotherapy alone in a first-line setting for HER2 -altered NSCLC, whereas an immune-based combination therapy may not be superior to a sole chemotherapy regimen. Activation of PI3 K/AKT signaling may mediate immunosuppression in HER2 -altered NSCLC.

BackgroundApproximately 3–5% of patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation-positive non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbor exon 18 mutations. The appropriate treatment for such patients has not been clarified. The aim of this study was to investigate the response of patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR exon 18 mutations to different therapeutic options.MethodsBetween May 2014 and September 2020, the clinical outcomes of 82 patients harboring EGFR exon 18 mutations who received first-generation (1G) EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), second-generation (2G) EGFR-TKI afatinib, chemotherapy, and 1G TKI in combination with chemotherapy as the initial therapy were retrospectively analyzed.ResultsA total of 82 NSCLC patients harboring EGFR 18 mutations with whose treatment and survival outcomes were available were analyzed. The median age was 59 years, and 47 (57.3%) were female. The most common kind of EGFR exon 18 mutation was G719X (75.6%), followed by E709X (15.9%), E709_T710delinsD (3.6%), and other subtypes (4.9%). There was a significant difference in median progression-free survival (mPFS) by therapeutic strategy (P = 0.017). The mPFS of 1G TKI, 2G TKI afatinib, chemotherapy, and 1G TKI in combination with chemotherapy were 7.7 (95% CI, 4.2–11.2), 11.3 (95% CI, 5.6–17.0), 5.0 (95% CI, 2.3–17.7), and 11.1 (95% CI, 5.9–16.4) months, respectively. No significant difference in PFS was observed between afatinib and 1G TKI in combination with chemotherapy (P = 0.709).ConclusionsLike afatinib, 1G TKI in combination with chemotherapy might be an effective treatment option for patients harboring EGFR exon 18 mutations.

Abstract Background Deciphering the correlation between immune-related adverse events (irAEs) categorized by organ system class and clinical benefit of immunotherapy is critical for clinical practice. The aim of this study is to investigate the incidence rates of irAEs and their correlations with objective response rate (ORR) in patients with advanced solid tumours treated with nivolumab (NIVO) or nivolumab plus ipilimumab (NIVO+IPI). Methods PubMed, Embase and Cochrane library were searched for eligible studies from January 1st, 2000 to May 1st 2019. Published clinical trials on NIVO or NIVO+IPI with reported irAEs were included. Logit transformation of the irAE incidences was applied for the generation of pooled estimate and Pearson correlation coefficient was calculated to evaluate the correlation between irAE and ORR. Results 48 clinical trials involving 7936 patients treated with NIVO or NIVO+IPI were included. Compared to NIVO, NIVO+IPI led to more all-grade and grade 3 or higher irAEs categorized by system organ class (P

Abstract Objectives Crizotinib has demonstrated good efficacy in patients with anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK)‐positive non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Continuing crizotinib therapy beyond progressive disease (CBPD) can achieve ongoing survival benefit in real‐world clinical practice. In terms of survival, progression‐free survival (PFS), the most commonly used endpoint in efficacy evaluations, may not provide accurate information on the impact of this intervention when crizotinib is administered in sequential therapy. Materials and Methods A single‐center, retrospective study of 201 ALK‐positive advanced NSCLC patients was conducted to analyze the PFS, overall survival (OS), and treatment duration (TD) of crizotinib. The correlations between the TD of crizotinib and OS in CBPD and non‐CBPD groups of patients were compared. Results All patients were treated with crizotinib, 150 of whom eventually developed progressive disease (PD). The median PFS1 and PFS2 were 13.2 months and 10.5 months, respectively. The OS of the whole population was 50.5 months. The median TD was 20.7 months, which is shorter than direct PFS1 + PFS2. The TD of crizotinib in CBPD group was significantly longer than that in non‐CBPD group (median 39.7 vs 15.0 months, P

Background Afatinib is an irreversible ErbB family blocker that improves progression‐free survival (PFS) of advanced EGFR‐mutant lung adenocarcinoma compared to chemotherapy. However, afatinib leads to more adverse events than first‐generation EGFR inhibitors. Hence, exploration of the optimal afatinib initial dose and its efficacy and safety in Asian patients has drawn extensive attention. Methods We retrospectively evaluated demographic and clinical information, survival data, and adverse events in advanced non‐small cell lung cancer patients treated with afatinib from 27 February 2017 to 30 October 2018. Results A total of 60 patients were included in the study. Thirty‐nine (65%) patients received afatinib as first‐line treatment. The median PFS was 12.3 months (95% confidence internal 7.6–17.0). Multivariate Cox regression analysis revealed that age, gender, smoking history, baseline brain metastasis status, afatinib starting dose, and mutation type did not significantly influence PFS. No significant difference in median PFS between patients treated with an initial dose of afatinib of 40 mg or 30 mg, either in the first‐line (14.5 vs. 5.2 months; P = 0.101) or in a second or later‐line setting (3.0 vs. 5.0 months; P = 0.375) was observed. The incidence of all grades of rash/acne (92.5% vs. 61.1%; P = 0.011) and paronychia (82.5% vs. 50.0%; P = 0.010) in the 40 mg group was significantly higher than in the 30 mg group. Conclusion First‐line afatinib treatment is beneficial for advanced lung adenocarcinoma patients with sensitive EGFR mutations. Initial dose and baseline brain metastasis status do not significantly impact PFS.

Standard treatment for resectable IIIa/N2 non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is still under debate. Optional treatments include chemotherapy, radiotherapy and surgery, other options include target therapy and immunotherapy. Multidisciplinary treatment has therefore been emphasized by various clinical trials, including bimodality strategy which has been defined as chemotherapy plus surgery or chemotherapy plus radiotherapy, and trimodality treatment which refers to chemotherapy plus surgery and radiotherapy. However, there is still no consensus on the optimal strategy on treating resectable IIIa/N2 NSCLC. Therefore, we reviewed a series of phase II and III clinical trials as well as some meta-analyses and case reports to compare the efficacy of different strategies on survival of cN2 NSCLC, and concluded that for resectable IIIa/N2 NSCLC surgery is recommended, and that strategy of chemotherapy plus surgery may not achieve better survival than that of chemotherapy plus radiotherapy. Size of tumor as well as lymph nodes should be taken into account when choosing optimal therapy, so that promising individualized strategy could be given to patients with resectable stage IIIa/N2 NSCLC.

BackgroundClinical evidence has shown that few non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients with epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations can benefit from immunotherapy. The tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) is a significant factor affecting the efficacy of immunotherapy. However, the TIME transformational process in EGFR-mutation patients is unknown.MethodsThe mRNA expression and mutation data and lung adenocarcinoma (LUAD) clinical data were obtained from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) database. Profiles describing the immune landscape of patients with EGFR mutations were characterized by differences in tumor mutation burden (TMB), ESTIMATE, CIBERSORT, and microenvironment cell populations-counter (MCP-counter).ResultsIn total, the TCGA data for 585 patients were analyzed. Among these patients, 98 had EGFR mutations. The TMB was lower in the EGFR group (3.94 mut/Mb) than in the KRAS mutation group (6.09 mut/Mb, P < 0.001) and the entire LUAD (6.58 mut/Mb, P < 0.001). The EGFR group had a lower population of activated immune cells and an even higher score of immunosuppressive cells. A further inter-group comparison showed that differences in the TMB and tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes were only found between patients with oncogenic mutations and unknown mutation. Meanwhile, there were more myeloid dendritic cells (DCs) in EGFR 19del than in L858R-mutation patients and in common mutation patents than in uncommon mutation patients (P < 0.05). Additionally, we established a D score, where D = MCP-counter score for cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CTLs)/MCP-counter score for myeloid DCs. Further analysis revealed that lower D scores indicated immune suppression and were negatively related to several immunotherapy biomarkers.ConclusionsThe TIME of EGFR mutant NSCLC was immunosuppressive. Myeloid DCs gradually increased in EGFR 19del, L858R, and uncommon mutations. The potential role of CTLs and DCs in the TIME of patients requires further investigation.

BRAF mutation is an oncogenic driver gene in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with low frequency. The data of patients with NSCLC harboring BRAF mutations is rare. We conducted a retrospective multicenter study in Chinese patients with NSCLC harboring BRAF mutations between Jan 2017 and Jul 2019. A total of 65 patients treated in 22 centers were included, 54 harbored BRAF-V600E mutation and 11 had non-V600E mutations, including K601E, G469S, G469V, G469A, G596R, G466R, and T599dup. Of 18 patients with early-stage disease at diagnosis and underwent a resection, the median disease-free survival (DFS) was 43.2, 18.7, and 10.1 months of stage I, II, and IIIA patients, respectively. In 46 patients with advanced-stage disease at data cutoff, disease control rate (DCR), and progression-free survival (PFS) of first-line anti-BRAF targeted therapy was superior than chemotherapy in patients harboring BRAF-V600E mutation (DCR, 100.0 vs. 70.0%, P = 0.027; median PFS, 9.8 vs. 5.4 months, P = 0.149). Of 30 V600E-mutated patients who received anti-BRAF therapy during the course of disease, median PFS of vemurafenib, dabrafenib, and dabrafenib plus trametinib was 7.8, 5.8, and 6.0 months, respectively (P = 0.970). Median PFS were similar between V600E and non-V600E patients (5.4 vs. 5.4 months, P = 0.825) to first-line chemotherapy. Nine patients were treated with checkpoint inhibitors, with median PFS of 3.0 months. Our data demonstrated the clinical benefit of anti-BRAF targeted therapy in Chinese NSCLC patients harboring BRAF-V600E mutation. The value of immunotherapy and treatment selection among non-V600E population needs further study.