Search

Background: With advances in treatment of cancer, patients who survive their first malignancy are at risk of developing additional malignancies. Data on the risks of secondary malignancies after treatment of some of the more common cancers are lacking.Methods: Our prospectively maintained database was queried from 1996 to 2016 to identify patients with breast cancer, colorectal cancer, melanoma, sarcoma, gastric, and pancreatic adenocarcinoma who developed additional malignancies. Predisposing clinical factors were included in our analysis.Results: We identified 756 patients diagnosed with a solid malignancy who developed a second malignancy, of which 606 (80.1%) had one of the most common treated cancers. 59.5% of patients were women. 810 additional malignancies were identified in the 606 patients with breast and colon cancer being the most common secondary malignancies. Of these 606 patients, 460 (76%) patients had two malignancies; 145 (23.9%) had 3 or more malignancies. 15.2% of patients were diagnosed under the age of 40.63 years. 8.3% patients had a known genetic mutation, with BReast CAncer gene, and Lynch mutations being the most common.Conclusion: Advances in cancer treatment have led to higher cure rates. These patients should continue surveillance and undergo screening as they may be at risk of developing additional malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction Hereditary diffuse gastric cancer (HDGC) is a cancer syndrome associated with variants in E-cadherin (CDH1), diffuse gastric cancer and lobular breast cancer. There is considerable heterogeneity in its clinical manifestations. This study aimed to determine associations between CDH1 germline variant status and clinical phenotypes of HDGC. Methods One hundred and fifty-two HDGC families, including six previously unreported families, were identified. CDH1 gene-specific guidelines released by the Clinical Genome Resource (ClinGen) CDH1 Variant Curation Expert Panel were applied for pathogenicity classification of truncating, missense and splice site CDH1 germline variants. We evaluated ORs between location of truncating variants of CDH1 and incidence of colorectal cancer, breast cancer and cancer at young age (gastric cancer at <40 or breast cancer <50 years of age). Results Frequency of truncating germline CDH1 variants varied across functional domains of the E-cadherin receptor gene and was highest in linker (0.05785 counts/base pair; p=0.0111) and PRE regions (0.10000; p=0.0059). Families with truncating CDH1 germline variants located in the PRE-PRO region were six times more likely to have family members affected by colorectal cancer (OR 6.20, 95% CI 1.79 to 21.48; p=0.004) compared with germline variants in other regions. Variants in the intracellular E-cadherin region were protective for cancer at young age (OR 0.2, 95% CI 0.06 to 0.64; p=0.0071) and in the linker regions for breast cancer (OR 0.35, 95% CI 0.12 to 0.99; p=0.0493). Different CDH1 genotypes were associated with different intracellular signalling activation levels including different p-ERK, p-mTOR and ß-catenin levels in early submucosal T1a lesions of HDGC families with different CDH1 variants. Conclusion T ype and location of CDH1 germline variants may help to identify families at increased risk for concomitant cancers that might benefit from individualised surveillance and intervention strategies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Prostate cancer (PCa) frequently develops antiapoptotic mechanisms and acquires resistance to anticancer drugs. Therefore, identifying PCa drug resistance determinants should facilitate designing more effective chemotherapeutic regimens. Recently, we described that the PCPH protein becomes highly expressed in human prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia and in PCa, and that the functional interaction between PCPH and protein kinase Cdelta (PKCdelta) increases the invasiveness of human PCa. Here, we report that the functional interaction between PCPH and a different PKC isoform, PKCalpha, confers resistance against cisplatin-induced apoptosis to PCa cells. This interaction elicits a mechanism ultimately resulting in the posttranslational stabilization and subsequent elevated expression of Bcl-2. Stable knockdown of either PCPH, mt-PCPH, or PKCalpha in PCa cells decreased Ser70-phosphorylated Bcl-2 and total Bcl-2 protein, thereby increasing their cisplatin sensitivity. Conversely, forced expression of the PCPH protein or, in particular, of the mt-PCPH oncoprotein increased the levels of phosphorylated PKCalpha concurrently with those of Ser70-phosphorylated and total Bcl-2 protein, thus promoting cisplatin resistance. Consistently, Bcl-2 knockdown sensitized PCa cells to cisplatin treatment and, more importantly, reversed the cisplatin resistance of PCa cells expressing the mt-PCPH oncoprotein. Moreover, reexpression of Bcl-2 in PCPH/mt-PCPH knockdown PCa cells reversed the cisplatin sensitization caused by PCPH or mt-PCPH down-regulation. These findings identify PCPH and mt-PCPH as important participants in the chemotherapy response of PCa cells, establish a role for PCPH-PKCalpha-Bcl-2 functional interactions in the drug response process, and imply that targeting PCPH expression before, or simultaneously with, chemotherapy may improve the treatment outcome for PCa patients.