Search

Clinical phenotypes of COVID-19, associated with mortality risk, have been identified in the general population. The present study assesses their applicability in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTR) hospital-admitted by COVID-19. In a cohort of 488 SOTR, nonvaccinated (n = 394) and vaccinated (n = 94) against SARS-CoV-2, we evaluated 16 demographic, clinical, analytical, and radiological variables to identify the clinical phenotypes A, B, and C. The median age was 61.0 (51-69) years, 330 (67.6%) and 158 (32.4%) were men and women, respectively, 415 (85%) had pneumonia, and 161 (33%) had SpO 2  < 95% at admission. All-cause mortality occurred in 105 (21.5%) cases. It was higher in nonvaccinated versus vaccinated SOTR (23.4% vs 13.8%, P = 0.04). Patients in the entire cohort were classified into phenotypes A (n = 149, 30.5%), B (n = 187, 38.3%), and C (n = 152, 31.1%), with mortality rates of 8.7%, 16.6%, and 40.1%, respectively, which were similar to those of nonvaccinated SOTR (9.5%, 16.7%, and 52.0%) and lower in vaccinated SOTR (4.4%, 15.8%, and 17.3%, respectively), with difference between nonvaccinated and vaccinated in the phenotype C (P < 0.001). In conclusion, COVID-19 clinical phenotypes are useful in SOTR, and all-cause mortality decreases in vaccinated patients., Competing Interests: Declarations. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests. Statement: The views expressed in this publication are the sole responsibility of the authors and the Commission is not responsible for any use that may be made of the information it contains., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Introduction: SARS CoV2 infection has had a major impact on renal transplant patients with a high mortality in the first months of the pandemic. Intentional reduction of immunosuppressive therapy has been postulated as one of the cornerstone in the management of the infection in the absence of targeted antiviral treatment. This has been modified according to the patient`s clinical situation and its effect on renal function or anti-HLA antibodies in the medium term has not been evaluated., Objectives: Evaluate the management of immunosuppressive therapy made during SARS-CoV2 infection, as well as renal function and anti-HLA antibodies in kidney transplant patients 6 months after COVID19 diagnosis., Material and Methods: Retrospective, national multicentre, retrospective study (30 centres) of kidney transplant recipients with COVID19 from 01/02/20 to 31/12/20. Clinical variables were collected from medical records and included in an anonymised database. SPSS statistical software was used for data analysis., Results: renal transplant recipients with COVID19 were included (62.6% male), with a mean age of 57.5 years. The predominant immunosuppressive treatment prior to COVID19 was triple therapy with prednisone, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid (54.6%) followed by m-TOR inhibitor regimens (18.6%). After diagnosis of infection, mycophenolic acid was discontinued in 73.8% of patients, m-TOR inhibitor in 41.4%, tacrolimus in 10.5% and cyclosporin A in 10%. In turn, 26.9% received dexamethasone and 50.9% were started on or had their baseline prednisone dose increased. Mean creatinine before diagnosis of COVID19, at diagnosis and at 6 months was: 1.7 ± 0.8, 2.1 ± 1.2 and 1.8 ± 1 mg/dl respectively (p < 0.001). 56.9% of the patients (N = 350) were monitored for anti-HLA antibodies. 94% (N = 329) had no anti-HLA changes, while 6% (N = 21) had positive anti-HLA antibodies. Among the patients with donor-specific antibodies post-COVID19 (N = 9), 7 patients (3.1%) had one immunosuppressant discontinued (5 patients had mycophenolic acid and 2 had tacrolimus), 1 patient had both immunosuppressants discontinued (3.4%) and 1 patient had no change in immunosuppression (1.1%), these differences were not significant., Conclusions: The management of immunosuppressive therapy after diagnosis of COVID19 was primarily based on discontinuation of mycophenolic acid with very discrete reductions or discontinuations of calcineurin inhibitors. This immunosuppression management did not influence renal function or changes in anti-HLA antibodies 6 months after diagnosis., (Copyright © 2022 Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Clinical management of transplant patients abruptly changed during the first months of COVID-19 pandemic (March to May 2020). The new situation led to very significant challenges, such as new forms of relationship between healthcare providers and patients and other professionals, design of protocols to prevent disease transmission and treatment of infected patients, management of waiting lists and of transplant programs during state/city lockdown, relevant reduction of medical training and educational activities, halt or delays of ongoing research, etc. The two main objectives of the current report are: 1) to promote a project of best practices in transplantation taking advantage of the knowledge and experience acquired by professionals during the evolving situation of the COVID-19 pandemic, both in performing their usual care activity, as well as in the adjustments taken to adapt to the clinical context, and 2) to create a document that collects these best practices, thus allowing the creation of a useful compendium for the exchange of knowledge between different Transplant Units. The scientific committee and expert panel finally standardized 30 best practices, including for the pretransplant period (n = 9), peritransplant period (n = 7), postransplant period (n = 8) and training and communication (n = 6). Many aspects of hospitals and units networking, telematic approaches, patient care, value-based medicine, hospitalization, and outpatient visit strategies, training for novelties and communication skills were covered. Massive vaccination has greatly improved the outcomes of the pandemic, with a decrease in severe cases requiring intensive care and a reduction in mortality. However, suboptimal responses to vaccines have been observed in transplant recipients, and health care strategic plans are necessary in these vulnerable populations. The best practices contained in this expert panel report may aid to their broader implementation., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2023. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Objectives: Anti-glutathione S transferase T1 (GSTT1) antibodies, a type of non-HLA antibody, have been associated with chronic hepatic graft rejection. Despite the presence of this enzyme in the kidney, there are not enough studies on the development of anti-GSTT1 antibodies and their impact on renal grafts. Our objective was to evaluate the presence of anti-GSTT1 antibodies after renal transplant and their impact on graft outcomes., Materials and Methods: We conducted an ambispective cohort study. We performed real-time polymerase chain reaction to screen for GSTT1 alleles in 293 recipients and their donors. In null GSTT1 (GSTT1*0) genotype recipients of GSTT1-positive donors, the presence of anti-GSTT1 antibodies was evaluated using indirect immunofluorescence and Luminex assays, and their effects on graft function were evaluated. The median follow-up period was 54.3 months., Results: Of the 293 patients studied, 42 recipients (14.4%) with GSTT1-positive donors did not have the GSTT1 allele (GSTT1-positive donor/GSTT1*0 recipient). Using Luminex assay, we detected antibodies in 16 patients (38.1%), 12 of which were already present at the time of transplant. Of these cases, 37.5% with antibodies had undergone a previous renal transplant. Using indirect immunofluorescence, we found that only 12 patients tested positive, 4 at the time of transplant. Antibody presence did not effect graft glomerular filtration rates or graft loss at 1 year, at 2 years, or end of follow-up., Conclusions: The presence of anti-GSTT1 antibodies is frequent in renal transplant GSTT1*0 recipients of GSTT1-positive donors but has no effects on graft outcome.

Background and Objective: After kidney transplantation, there is an overall increase in weight, which may increase the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and graft loss. But, not all patients gain weight, and the impact on the graft of this different evolution has not been well studied. The objective was to determine the causes of this different evolution and its effect on the graft., Patients and Methods: Retrospective single-center cohort study of 201 patients followed up after transplantation, analyzing the determinants of the variation in weight at one year using logistic regression, and its effect on graft survival at the end of follow-up using Cox regression., Results: Globally, there was an average weight gain of 4.5 kg in the first year, but 26.6% lost weight. 37.2% increased their BMI, while 9.5% decreased it. The determinants of the different evolution of weight were age (OR for every 10 years: 0.6, p = 0.002), previous dialysis modality (ref. hemodialysis) (OR 0.3, p = 0.003), and BMI before transplantation (OR 0.9, p = 0.017). The different evolution of weight did not influence the final situation of the graft. The BMI at one year did influence as a continuous variable (HR 1.3, p = 0.003), and obesity, with a worse evolution (HR 7.0, p = 0.025)., Conclusions: Although not all patients gain weight after kidney transplantation, the different evolution of weight does not influence graft survival., (Copyright © 2021 Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: SARS CoV2 infection has had a major impact on renal transplant patients with a high mortality in the first months of the pandemic. Intentional reduction of immunosuppressive therapy has been postulated as one of the cornerstone in the management of the infection in the absence of targeted antiviral treatment. This has been modified according to the patient`s clinical situation and its effect on renal function or anti-HLA antibodies in the medium term has not been evaluated., Objectives: Evaluate the management of immunosuppressive therapy made during SARS-CoV2 infection, as well as renal function and anti-HLA antibodies in kidney transplant patients 6 months after COVID19 diagnosis., Material and Methods: Retrospective, national multicentre, retrospective study (30 centres) of kidney transplant recipients with COVID19 from 01/02/20 to 31/12/20. Clinical variables were collected from medical records and included in an anonymised database. SPSS statistical software was used for data analysis., Results: 615 renal transplant recipients with COVID19 were included (62.6% male), with a mean age of 57.5 years.The predominant immunosuppressive treatment prior to COVID19 was triple therapy with prednisone, tacrolimus and mycophenolic acid (54.6%) followed by m-TOR inhibitor regimens (18.6%). After diagnosis of infection, mycophenolic acid was discontinued in 73.8% of patients, m-TOR inhibitor in 41.4%, tacrolimus in 10.5% and cyclosporin A in 10%. In turn, 26.9% received dexamethasone and 50.9% were started on or had their baseline prednisone dose increased.Mean creatinine before diagnosis of COVID19, at diagnosis and at 6 months was: 1.7±0.8, 2.1±1.2 and 1.8±1 mg/dl respectively (p<0.001).56.9% of the patients (N=350) were monitored for anti-HLA antibodies. 94% (N=329) had no anti-HLA changes, while 6% (N=21) had positive anti-HLA antibodies. Among the patients with donor-specific antibodies post-COVID19 (N=9), 7 patients (3.1%) had one immunosuppressant discontinued (5 patients had mycophenolic acid and 2 had tacrolimus), 1 patient had both immunosuppressants discontinued (3.4%) and 1 patient had no change in immunosuppression (1.1%), these differences were not significant., Conclusions: The management of immunosuppressive therapy after diagnosis of COVID19 was primarily based on discontinuation of mycophenolic acid with very discrete reductions or discontinuations of calcineurin inhibitors. This immunosuppression management did not influence renal function or changes in anti-HLA antibodies 6 months after diagnosis., (© 2022 Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U.)

Background and Objective: After kidney transplantation, there is an overall increase in weight, which may increase the risk of chronic kidney disease (CKD) and graft loss. But, not all patients gain weight, and the impact on the graft of this different evolution has not been well studied. The objective was to determine the causes of this different evolution and its effect on the graft., Patients and Methods: Retrospective single-center cohort study of 201 patients followed up after transplantation, analyzing the determinants of the variation in weight at one year using logistic regression, and its effect on graft survival at the end of follow-up using Cox regression., Results: Globally, there was an average weight gain of 4.5kg in the first year, but 26.6% lost weight. 37.2% increased their BMI, while 9.5% decreased it. The determinants of the different evolution of weight were age (OR for every 10 years: 0.6, P=.002), previous dialysis modality (ref. hemodialysis) (OR 0.3, P=.003), and BMI before transplantation (OR 0.9, P=.017). The different evolution of weight did not influence the final situation of the graft. The BMI at one year did influence as a continuous variable (HR 1.3, P=.003), and obesity, with a worse evolution (HR 7.0, P=.025)., Conclusions: Although not all patients gain weight after kidney transplantation, the different evolution of weight does not influence graft survival., (Copyright © 2021 Sociedad Española de Nefrología. Published by Elsevier España, S.L.U. All rights reserved.)

The aim was to analyze the characteristics and predictors of unfavorable outcomes in solid organ transplant recipients (SOTRs) with COVID-19. We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 210 consecutive SOTRs hospitalized with COVID-19 in 12 Spanish centers from 21 February to 6 May 2020. Data pertaining to demographics, chronic underlying diseases, transplantation features, clinical, therapeutics, and complications were collected. The primary endpoint was a composite of intensive care unit (ICU) admission and/or death. Logistic regression analyses were performed to identify the factors associated with these unfavorable outcomes. Males accounted for 148 (70.5%) patients, the median age was 63 years, and 189 (90.0%) patients had pneumonia. Common symptoms were fever, cough, gastrointestinal disturbances, and dyspnea. The most used antiviral or host-targeted therapies included hydroxychloroquine 193/200 (96.5%), lopinavir/ritonavir 91/200 (45.5%), and tocilizumab 49/200 (24.5%). Thirty-seven (17.6%) patients required ICU admission, 12 (5.7%) suffered graft dysfunction, and 45 (21.4%) died. A shorter interval between transplantation and COVID-19 diagnosis had a negative impact on clinical prognosis. Four baseline features were identified as independent predictors of intensive care need or death: advanced age, high respiratory rate, lymphopenia, and elevated level of lactate dehydrogenase. In summary, this study presents comprehensive information on characteristics and complications of COVID-19 in hospitalized SOTRs and provides indicators available upon hospital admission for the identification of SOTRs at risk of critical disease or death, underlining the need for stringent preventative measures in the early post-transplant period., Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Acute respiratory distress syndrome associated with coronavirus infection is related to a cytokine storm with large interleukin-6 (IL-6) release. The IL-6-receptor blocker tocilizumab may control the aberrant host immune response in patients with coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) . In this pandemic, kidney transplant (KT) recipients are a high-risk population for severe infection and showed poor outcomes. We present a multicenter cohort study of 80 KT patients with severe COVID-19 treated with tocilizumab during hospital admission. High mortality rate was identified (32.5%), related with older age (hazard ratio [HR] 3.12 for those older than 60 years, P = .039). IL-6 and other inflammatory markers, including lactic acid dehydrogenase, ferritin, and D-dimer increased early after tocilizumab administration and their values were higher in nonsurvivors. Instead, C-reactive protein (CRP) levels decreased after tocilizumab, and this decrease positively correlated with survival (mean 12.3 mg/L in survivors vs. 33 mg/L in nonsurvivors). Each mg/L of CRP soon after tocilizumab increased the risk of death by 1% (HR 1.01 [confidence interval 1.004-1.024], P = .003). Although patients who died presented with worse respiratory situation at admission, this was not significantly different at tocilizumab administration and did not have an impact on outcome in the multivariate analysis. Tocilizumab may be effective in controlling cytokine storm in COVID-19 but randomized trials are needed., (© 2020 The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.)

Introduction: Congestive heart failure (CHF) is a common complication in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). In addition to classical risk factors (e.g. age and pre-existing cardiac diseases), other potential reversible abnormalities linked to CKD such as anaemia, volume overload, or vascular access placement may also influence the incidence and severity of acute exacerbations of CHF., Objective: This study aims to determine the incidence and main determinants of CHF in a cohort of patients with stage 4-5 pre-dialysis CKD., Patients and Method: The study group consisted of 562 patients (mean age: 65 +/- 15 years, 260 females, 31% diabetics). Native arteriovenous fistulas (AVF) were created in 160 patients who chose haemodialysis as the initial technique for renal replacement therapy. The main outcome variables were: acute decompensated CHF (defined by standard criteria), dialysis initiation (planned and unplanned), and death before dialysis initiation. In addition to demographics, comorbidities, and clinical and biochemical data, AVF creation was also included as a potential determinant of CHF in multiple logistic regression models., Results: Ninety-five patients (17%) developed at least one episode of acute decompensated CHF, and the incidence rate was 19 episodes per 1000 patient-years. In addition to classical risk factors (age, female sex, obesity, diabetes, and previous history of CHF or coronary artery disease), creation of a successful AVF significantly increased the risk of CHF (OR=9.54, 95% CI: 4.84-18.81, P<.0001). In 47 out of 95 patients who developed CHF, a functioning AVF had previously been created, 92% of which were upper arm native AVF, with a median of 51 days between the surgical procedure and CHF episode. The mortality of patients with CHF was similar to that of the rest of the study patients, although unplanned dialysis initiation was significantly more frequent in those who developed CHF., Conclusions: Acute decompensated CHF episodes are common in pre-dialysis CKD patients. In addition to classical risk factors, pre-emptive AVF placement was strongly associated with the development of CHF.

Introduction: High serum phosphorus (P) has been shown to be associated with a more rapid decline of renal function in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD)., Objective: The aim of this study was to determine whether time-averaged serum P levels are associated with the progression of renal failure adjusted for other potential confounders., Patients and Methods: A prospective observational study of 184 patients with pre-dialysis CKD, stages 3, 4 and 5 (mean GFR=15.2±5.6 ml/min/1.73 m2). The rate of decline in renal function was calculated as the slope of GFR. Median follow-up time was 303 days. Biochemical parameters were analysed as time-averaged concentrations. Multivariate linear regression analysis was used to assess the best determinants of serum P levels, and the relationship between the rate of decline of renal function and the study covariates., Results: The best determinants of serum P levels were: GFR (beta = 0.477), female sex (beta = 0.106), serum calcium (beta = -0.274), serum albumin (beta = -0.112), serum bicarbonate (beta = -0.182), protein catabolic rate (beta = 0.144), and use of diuretics (beta = 0.180). The mean ± standard deviation (SD) slope of GFR was -0.198±0.376 ml/min/month. The best determinants of the slope of GFR were: proteinuria (beta = -0.462), serum P (beta = -0.440), and basal GFR (beta = -0.404). Total urinary P excretion was not significantly associated with the rate of decline of renal function., Conclusion: High serum P levels are strongly and independently associated with a more rapid decline of renal function in patients with advanced CKD.

Introduction: Insulin resistance (IR) increases significantly the risk for cardiovascular disease (CV) in the general population. IR is a common metabolic disorder in patients with chronic kidney disease (CKD). However, the influence of IR on the evolution of CKD patients has scarcely been studied., Objective: This study aims to determine whether IR is associated with the progression of CKD, the development of new CV events, or all-cause mortality of non-diabetic patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 not yet on dialysis., Material and Methods: The study group consisted of 365 non-diabetic patients (63 ± 16 year, 169 females) with GFR < 30 ml/min. The degree of IR was estimated by the Homeostasis Model Assessment parameter (HOMA). The outcome measures were: progression of CKD (composite of initiation of dialysis or doubling of baseline serum creatinine level), new cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality. Unadjusted and multivariable-adjusted relative risks were calculated for HOMA either as a continuous or qualitative variable (tertiles), using Cox proportional hazards models., Results: Mean HOMA value (± SD) was 4.28 ± 2.07. HOMA values correlated significantly with body mass index (beta = 0.37; p < 0.0001), plasma triglycerides (beta = 0.22; p < 0.0001), plasma albumin (beta = 0.19; p = 0.007), and serum phosphate (beta = 0.17; p = 0.031). Progression of CKD was observed in 234 patients (64%) with a median follow-up of 542 days. Patients with HOMA values in the lower tertile (< 3.13) showed a slower progression of CKD than that of the rest of study patients (log rank 4.16, p < 0.05). In adjusted models for age, sex, baseline GFR, body mass index, and proteinuria, HOMA values in the lower tertile entered as an independent variable in the best predictive equation for progression of CKD (HR 0.72, p < 0.03). Fifty-one patients developed a new CV event and 103 patients died during the study period (median follow-up of 1,103 days). HOMA did not relate to the development of new CV events or all-cause mortality in unadjusted or adjusted models for age, sex, comorbid index, plasma albumin, and C-reactive protein., Conclusions: In conclusion, progression of renal disease was slower in those non-diabetic CKD patients with low HOMA values; however, HOMA values did not relate to the development of new CV events or all-cause mortality.

Aim: Dual blockade of renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has increased antiproteinuric effects and it has been increasingly used on patients with proteinuria, but could have secondary effects when this kind of treatment is administered to patients with single functioning kidney. The aim of this study has been to assess the efficacy and safety of dual blockade of RAS in this group of patients., Design and Methods: Sixteen patients with a single functioning kidney have been treated in our unit with dual RAS blockade due to proteinuria higher than 1 g/24 h. Mean age was 54.7+/-12.1 years, they were 12 males and 4 females. Analytical data of six months visit and last follow up visit have been retrospectively registered. Several different angiotensin conversor enzyme (ACE) inhibitors and angiotensin receptor blocking (ARB) drugs were used at the maximal dose tolerated by the patient., Results: A small but not significant reduction of SBP and DBP were was observed throughout the study. Mean K+ increase in the second visit (from 4.65+/-0.67 to 5.01+/-1.02 mmol/l, not significant). There were no changes neither in plasmatic creatinine (baseline 1.86+/-0.67, 6 months 1.96+/-0.85) nor in creatinine clearance (baseline 65.2+/-26.9, 6 months 61.6+/-23.8 ml/min). Proteinuria was not reduced by dual RAS blockade (baseline 4.26+/-0.24, 6 months 4.25+/-0.39)., Conclusions: Dual RAS blockade seems to be safe but unhelpful in renal patients with proteinuria associated to single functioning kidney.

In kidney transplantation patient and graft survival are excellent in short-term and mid-term, although they remain stable in the long-term.The incidence of acute rejection has decreased to 8%-15%.Despite marked progress in understanding immunologic mechanisms involved in transplantation, new tools are required to detect early changes that could affect allograft function allowing us to anticipate histological lesions and providing a more accurate use of immunosuppressive drugs.From an immunologic point of view, efforts should be directed to avoid interstitial fibrosis and tubular atrophy (IF/TA) and to prevent antibody-mediated rejection.The most frequent cause of late graft loss is IF/TA.Improvement in kidney transplant results have been achieved with calcineurin inhibitors -CNI- (cyclosporin and tacrolimus), antiproliferative agents (mycophenolate mofetil and enteric-coated mycophenolic acid) and T-cell depleting antibodies. The combination of tacrolimus + mycophenolate mofetil + steroids has been the gold standard in kidney transplant immunosuppression. An adequate balance in order to maintain the appropriate immune response is essential to the patient to avoid infections or neoplasias as well to prevent rejection.In renal transplant recipients with chronic kidney disease stage 4T in which renal function remains stable,immuno-suppressive drugs can be continued at the usual maintenance doses. As GFR declines, CNI and antiproliferative drugs should be reduced.

Dyslipidemia is a well-established risk factor for cardiovascular diseases in the general population. However, this association is not observed in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This study examines the association between lipid levels, including apolipoproteins A-I and B concentrations, and all-cause mortality or the development of new cardiovascular events in advanced CKD patients not yet on dialysis. This observational prospective historical study included 331 patients with CKD stage 4 or 5 not yet on dialysis. In addition to conventional clinical and biochemical data, total cholesterol, triglycerides, HDL, LDL, apolipoprotein A-I (apo A) and B (apo B) plasma concentrations were measured. Cox proportional hazard models were adjusted for age, sex, comorbidity index, residual renal function, serum albumin, C-reactive protein levels, and treatment with statins. The median follow-up time was 985 days, and during this period 105 patients died and 54 patients had a new cardiovascular event. In fully-adjusted fixed-covariate Cox models, the hazard ratio for each 10 mg/dl increase of apo A concentration was 0.915 (C.I. 95% 0.844 to 0.992; p=0,031). Patients with an apo A /apo B ratio in the upper tertile (i.e. > 1.42) had a better survival than that of the rest of study patients (hazard ratio = 0.592, C.I. 95% 0.368 to 0.953, p<0.05). None of the study lipid parameters was associated with new cardiovascular events in the adjusted models. In conclusion, apo A concentrations and high apo A / apo B ratios added independent predictive information about survival of CKD patients not yet on dialysis.

Although long-term outcomes also improved, graft loss caused by chronic allograft nephropathy remains an important obstacle. This situation, together with the progressive increase in the number of renal transplant patients, means that the population of transplant patients readmitted to a dialysis program will be progressively greater. The mortality rate in patients starting dialysis after graft loss has been reported as variable, though higher than that observed in patients with a functioning graft and that observed in patients on dialysis treatment. However, it is not known how the management of chronic kidney disease patients in the transplant setting differs from that of patients with native kidney disease with a similar degree of renal dysfunction. Many patients in stages 4T-5T have chronic kidney disease related complications that fall below targets established for nontransplant chronic kidney disease patients. A limited number of studies have evaluated patients returning to dialysis after graft failure and the different guidelines in the setting of transplantation have not analyzed this crucial aspect so important. Parting from this premise, a working group of the Spanish Society of Nephrology in the field of kidney transplantation and dialysis has reviewed in-depth each of the clinical aspects of care of patients with kidney transplant failure coming back to dialysis and drawn up a consensus document in order to optimize the management of this condition.

There's no controlled and prospective studies which show the safest and most effective way to reduce or suspend immunosuppression drugs dosage, and only few groups have published their own protocols. There are reasons to discontinue the immunosuppression therapy; the high incidence of infections is the most important. However, a fast withdrawal is not free of problems, like are residual renal function decline and graft intolerance signs, which could take to nephrectomy, a high risk intervention. Most recommended guidelines for immunosuppression use are: - Antimetabolites immediately cancellation and corticoesteroids slow drop (level C recommendation). - Calcineurin inhibitors could be discontinued but if residual renal function is still significant, it is recommended to maintain a low dosage over three to six months; then, withdrawal may be done slowly (level C recommendation). We have not found information supporting the immunosuppression use beyond six months.

The rate of oxalate absorbed from intestine is highly influenced by calcium intake in healthy subjects. It is unknown whether commonly used phosphate binders modify intestinal absorption and renal excretion of oxalate in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. This study aims to determine if calcium carbonate or sevelamer influences on urinary oxalate excretion. Twenty patients with CKD (stage 4 and 5 pre-dialysis) were included. Two treatment (1500 mg of calcium carbonate or 2400 mg of sevelamer), two-period (21 days each), crossover study with balanced assignment of the order of administration, and two washout periods were the main characteristics of this study design. Laboratory analyses in each phase included: serum creatinine, calcium, phosphorus, bicarbonate, total cholesterol, and 24 h urinary excretion of oxalate, creatinine, and urea. Creatinine clearance, protein catabolic rate (PNNA), total urinary oxalate excretion, and urinary oxalate / creatinine ratio were determined. Seventeen patients completed both treatment sequences. Total urinary oxalate excretion and urinary oxalate / creatinine ratios decreased significantly with respect to washout periods either after sevelamer or calcium carbonate treatment. The decrease in urinary oxalate excretion was greater after calcium carbonate (41.2+/-17.4%) than after sevelamer treatment (30.4+/-23.8%). There were not significant changes in renal function or PNNA values throughout the study periods. In conclusion, either calcium carbonate or sevelamer significantly reduces urinary oxalate excretion in CKD patients. Further studies will be needed to ascertain whether the type of phosphate binder influences on the accumulation of oxalate in CKD patients.

The increase in patients on dialysis awaiting transplantation has led to the use of grafts from suboptimal donors. The aim of this study was to analyze the function of suboptimal grafts. The secondary objectives were to study vascular and urological complications, as well as delayed renal function and acute rejection episodes. The study included 135 transplantations performed over 4 years with 27% of grafts being from suboptimal donors. Early graft loss was 12%, of which 69% were due to vascular thrombosis. These thromboses were more frequent among grafts from suboptimal donors (30% vs 4%, P < .001). There were no significant differences between the groups in the incidence of acute rejection episodes (17% vs 13%) or delayed graft function (14% vs 13%). A greater incidence of urologic complications was observed among recipients of grafts from older donors. The 1-year creatinine clearance was significantly lower among recipients of grafts from older donors (73 +/- 19 vs 51 +/- 14 mL/min, P < .0001). Sequential immunosuppressive therapy resulted in a lack of significant differences in creatinine clearance at 6 months, 1 year, or 2 years after transplantation between suboptimal grafts with cold ischemia greater or less than 20 hours or in warm ischemia greater or less than 60 minutes. Logistic regression analysis showed that the best determinant of graft loss was donor age older than 60 years. Accordingly, grafts from suboptimal donors were more likely to be lost during the first month after transplantation, particularly because of thrombosis, which was not due to a higher degree of technical complexity of the transplant operation.

Background: Elevated levels of inflammatory markers have been shown to be associated with increased mortality in chronic kidney disease (CKD) patients. Comorbid indexes are also helpful clinical instruments for predicting mortality. At present, it is unknown whether inflammatory markers add predictive information of death beyond that provided by comorbid indexes., Methods: This observational single-centre study included 404 patients (mean age 63+/-16 years) with CKD stage 4 and 5 predialysis who were prospectively followed-up. Data obtained at baseline: demographics, grade of comorbidity by Davies index, serum albumin, creatinine clearance, total white blood cell (WBC), polymorphonuclear leukocyte (PMN) counts, and high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (CRP) were analysed as potential determinants of the subsequent all-cause mortality. Receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to determine the values of CRP, WBC and PMN most closely related to mortality. These cut-off values were used to define subgroups with high or low inflammatory markers. Uni- and multivariate Cox regression models were performed., Results: Median follow-up time was 583 days, with a mortality of 26%, and overall survival rate of 47%. In unadjusted Cox models, inflammatory markers (CRP, WBC and PMN) were all significantly associated with all-cause mortality. Age (HR 1.05; 95% CI 1.03-1.07, P<0.0001) and comorbid index (HR 2.15; 95% CI 1.54-3.00, P<0.0001) were strongly associated with mortality. The introduction of inflammatory markers into the multivariate Cox regression model did not add significant predictive power. In a stepwise Cox model, the age, comorbid index, serum albumin levels and creatinine clearance were the best predictive variables of mortality., Conclusions: Although elevated inflammatory markers are associated with a worse outcome in CKD patients, they did not add predictive information of all-cause mortality beyond that provided by age and the comorbid index.