1. Do bisphosphonates and RANKL inhibitors alter the progression of coronary artery calcification? A systematic review.
- Author
-
Saunders SL, Chaudhri K, McOrist NS, Gladysz K, Gnanenthiran SR, and Shalaby G
- Subjects
- Humans, Observational Studies as Topic, Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic, Bone Density Conservation Agents therapeutic use, Coronary Artery Disease drug therapy, Denosumab therapeutic use, Diphosphonates therapeutic use, Diphosphonates pharmacology, Disease Progression, RANK Ligand antagonists & inhibitors, Vascular Calcification drug therapy
- Abstract
Objectives: To determine whether bisphosphonates and NF-κB ligand (RANKL) inhibitors delay coronary artery calcification (CAC)., Design: A systematic review was conducted., Data Sources: MEDLINE, EMBASE and CENTRAL., Eligibility Criteria: Longitudinal studies investigating CAC progression in adults (>18 years) taking either a bisphosphonate or denosumab compared with those who did not., Data Extraction and Synthesis: Study and participant characteristics, and primary outcome ( ∆ CAC from baseline to follow-up) were extracted. The Risk Of Bias In Non-Randomised Studies-of Interventions (ROBINS-I) and Risk-of-Bias Tool for Randomised Trials (RoB2) tools were used to assess the risk of bias for observational and randomised controlled trials (RCTs), respectively. Outcome measures were reported., Results: Four observational studies and one RCT (n=377) were included. Three studies solely reported the effect of bisphosphonates on ∆ CAC; one study (n=56) demonstrated a statistically significant CAC reduction in the intervention group (-372 mm
3 /year) compared with control (+159 mm3 /year) (p<0.01). One study (n=14) demonstrated a difference in ∆ CAC between intervention (+880 mm3 /year) versus control (+2220 mm3 /year), however, no p value comparing groups was reported. One study (n=115) found no statistically significant difference between intervention and control.One study (n=42) exclusively investigated the effect of RANKL on ∆ CAC; there was a statistically significant reduction in CAC at 6-month follow-up between intervention (-133±124 modified Agatston unit (AU)) and control (+188±72 modified AU), p=0.03.One study (n=150) compared both bisphosphonates and denosumab to control and found no statistically significant difference between either intervention group and control over 24 months. Meta-analysis was not performed due to limited, heterogeneous studies., Conclusions: There is insufficient evidence supporting the correlation between bisphosphonate or RANKL inhibitor use and CAC progression. Further research is warranted., Competing Interests: Competing interests: None declared., (© Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2024. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.)- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF