Search

OBJECTIVE:to evaluate the effectiveness and applicability of Holmium laser enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) - in the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) - in comparison to transurethral resection of the prostate (TURP).METHODS:patients with symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia and candidates for surgical treatment were selected. Both procedures were explained and they had choosen HoLEP or TURP. At the hospital were collected: age, date of birth, international prostate symptom score, urinary peak flow rate, prostate volume, post-voiding residual urine, globular volume and serum PSA. At the procedure operating time, morcellating time (HoLEP), bladder mucosal injury and intercurrences were collected. At the first postoperative day, globular volume and sodium. Besides that were observed the catheter indwelling time and hospital stay and after 90 days, urinary peak flow rate and international prostate symptom score. Statistical analisys have been done partially by Sinpe(r) and also by a professional team.RESULTS:twenty patients in HoLEP group and 21 at TURP were operated. Baseline urinary peak flow rate was 8 ml/s in both groups and preoperative international prostate symptom score was 22 in HoLEP and 20 in TURP, very similar. Operative time was 85 minutes in HoLEP and 60 in TURP, pCONCLUSION:HoLEP is a feasible technique and is as effective as TURP on symptomatic prostatic hyperplasia surgical treatment. OBJETIVO: avaliar a eficácia e a aplicabilidade da enucleação prostática com Holmium Laser (HoLEP), no tratamento da hiperplasia prostática benigna (HPB), comparando-a à ressecção transuretral da próstata (RTUp).MÉTODOS:ambos os procedimentos eram explicados aos pacientes com indicação de tratamento cirúrgico e eles escolhiam qual procedimento seria realizado, HoLEP ou RTUp. Eram coletados dados da internação, dados clínicos, escore de sintomas e pico de fluxo urinário. No ato operatório registravam-se tempo cirúrgico, tempo de morcelamento (nos casos de HoLEP), lesão vesical ou intercorrências. Noventa dias após a operação era feita uma nova avaliação do pico de fluxo urinário e escore de sintomas. A análise estatística foi realizada em parte pelo programa Sinpe(r) e também por uma equipe profissional.RESULTADOS:foram operados 20 pacientes no grupo HoLEP e 21 no RTUp. O pico de fluxo urinário pré-operatório foi 8ml/s em ambos os grupos. O escore de sintomas pré-operatório foi 22 no grupo HoLEP e 20 no RTUp. O tempo operatório foi 85 minutos no grupo HoLEP e 60 minutos no RTUp, pCONCLUSÃO: o HoLEP é técnica tão eficaz quanto RTUp, no tratamento da HPB. A enucleação prostática com Holmium laser (HoLEP) é técnica eficaz no tratamento da HPB e pode ser aplicável, pois produz resultados, em termos de eficácia e aplicabilidade, comparáveis à RTUp.

Purpose The purpose of the study is to compare the clearance of procalcitonin (PCT-c) in the first 24 and 48 hours of treatment of severe sepsis and septic shock with another early prognostic marker represented by the 48-hour Δ Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA). Materials and methods Prospective, observational cohort study conducted in a general intensive care unit including patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. The PCT-c was determined at the diagnosis of sepsis and after 24 and 48 hours. The SOFA score was determined at the time of intensive care unit admission and after 48 hours. Results One hundred thirty adult patients with severe sepsis and septic shock were studied over an 18-month period. The 24- and 48-hour PTC-c scores were significantly higher in survivors ( P Δ SOFA was significantly smaller ( P = .01). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve was 0.68 for Δ SOFA and 0.76 for 24- and 48-hour PCT-c. Conclusions The 48-hour Δ SOFA score and the clearance of 24- and 48-hour PCT are useful markers of prognosis in patients with severe sepsis and septic shock. A decrease in PCT-c in the first 24 hours of treatment should prompt the reassessment of the appropriateness and adequacy of treatment.