Search

Franck F Rahaghi,1 Richard Monk,2 Viswanathan Ramakrishnan,3 Tatsiana Beiko,2 Charlie Strange2 1Department of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USA; 2Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, Allergy and Sleep Medicine, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USA; 3Department of Public Health Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, USACorrespondence: Franck F RahaghiDepartment of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Cleveland Clinic Florida, Weston, FL, USATel +1 954 659 5450Fax +1 954 6595451Email rahaghf@ccf.orgPurpose: The extent of the survival benefit of augmentation therapy for alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) in individuals with advanced COPD is difficult to define. We performed a retrospective analysis using all available data from the observational registry of individuals with severe deficiency of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) conducted by the NHLBI investigators.Patients and Methods: Individuals (N=1129) with severe deficiency of AAT were evaluated for mortality using all data sources and stratified by 10% increments of baseline forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) percent predicted and by augmentation therapy status (ever receiving versus never receiving). Kaplan–Meier survival curves were constructed for each of the deciles comparing survival in treated vs non-treated groups. A multivariable model was performed to define the correlates of survival in individuals with FEV1 < 30% predicted.Results: Amongst all subjects, augmentation was associated with improved survival (p< 0.0001). Among the individuals ever receiving augmentation therapy, survival was better than for those not receiving augmentation at all 10% increments of FEV1% predicted from 10% to 60% (P values < 0.05 in all deciles). In subgroups of participants with hyperinflation defined as residual volume (RV)> 120% predicted and in subgroups of participants with reduced diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO) < 70% predicted, there was significantly better survival for those ever receiving augmentation therapy than for those who never received augmentation (p< 0.001). A multivariable analysis showed that mortality benefit is influenced by age, DLCO % predicted, and augmentation therapy.Conclusion: There is a survival benefit from augmentation therapy in AATD between FEV1 values in the 10– 60% predicted range. Screening and treatment of AATD patients should therefore not be limited by the severity of illness as defined by FEV1.Keywords: alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency, COPD, mortality, augmentation therapy, FEV1, survival

Background: The World Health Organization (WHO) declared the end of the COVID-19 (SARS-CoV-2) global public health emergency on May 5, 2023, but its long-term consequences have still been haunting the global population. Post-acute sequelae of COVID-19 (PASC) and long-term COVID-19 are serious concerns and present with various symptoms. Intranasal chlorpheniramine (iCPM) has been shown to decrease the viral burden of SARS-COV-2. iCPM uses decreased COVID-19 disease progression and severity in Accelerating COVID-19 Clinical Recovery in an Outpatient Setting (ACROSS)-I & III randomized control trials (RCT)., Methods: This prospective survey study included 259 participants in ACROSS I and III RCTs. We compared the effect of iCPM versus placebo on the reduction of PASC symptoms. A PASC questionnaire containing 17 questions regarding the most common PASC symptoms was used in this study. T-test and Pearson chi-square statistics were performed according to continuous and categorical data using STATA 17.0 Basic Edition software., Findings: The iCPM cohort had a lower proportion of patients with fatigue or tiredness vs. placebo (0 Vs 17, 21, p < 0.001). iCPM cohort had a lower proportion of patients with difficulty concentrating or mental confusion (0 vs. 22, 27, p < 0.001). iCPM cohort had also a lower number of patients with difficulty in the ability to perform daily activities or work vs. placebo (1 Vs 38, 48, p < 0.001). A smaller number of patients in the iCPM cohort sought medical attention for PACS symptoms compared to placebo (0 vs. 48, 68, p < 0.001)., Interpretation: The use of intranasal chlorpheniramine shows promise in preventing COVID-19 progression to the often-debilitating post-COVID-19 syndrome PASC. The association between iCPM use and a lower prevalence of PASC symptoms is strong. Further studies are needed to establish the role of ICPM in preventing PASC., Competing Interests: Declarations. Ethics approval and consent to participate: This study was approved by the Institutional Review Board (IRB) of the Ethics Committee of Investigation of Infectious and Zoonotic Disease at the Universidad Nacional Autónoma de Honduras. Written informed consent was obtained from all participants prior to their involvement in the study. In cases where verbal consent was required (e.g., remote participation), this consent was documented and witnessed by study personnel. No waivers of consent were requested or provided by the ethics committee, and no minors were included in the study. Consent for publication: N/A-Not Applicable. Competing interests: The authors declare no competing interests., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Case Presentation: A 76-year-old male Vietnam veteran with a medical history of OSA on CPAP, mild COPD, Parsonage-Turner syndrome (a rare neurologic syndrome manifesting with shoulder and arm pain), hypertension, gastroesophageal reflux, hiatal hernia, and prior endocarditis presented with 1 year duration progressive exertional dyspnea with minimal activity by referral from an outside pulmonologist. The patient reported possible exposure to Agent Orange during his service but was otherwise without significant occupational or environmental exposures. His exercise tolerance was well-maintained up until the last 12 months. Aside from marginal cigarette use, he denied any recreational drug use or any anorectic use. The patient provided records from a recent right heart catheterization (RHC) months earlier for review., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: F. F. R. has served as a consultant or speaker for United Therapeutics Corporation, Actelion Pharmaceuticals, Gilead Sciences, Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals, and Lung Therapeutics Inc. None declared (V. W., I. R. D., L. S.)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Treprostinil is a prostacyclin analogue that targets multiple cellular receptors to treat pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). In certain scenarios, patients may require aggressive treprostinil titration. Several studies have demonstrated that higher doses of treprostinil lead to greater clinical benefit. Data supports successful transitions from parenteral to oral treprostinil; however, administration routes, transition duration, and transition setting vary in the real-world. The EXPEDITE clinical trial (NCT03497689) prospectively studied whether rapid parenteral treprostinil induction can be used to achieve high doses of oral treprostinil (total daily dose: ≥12 mg) in prostacyclin naïve PAH patients. Parenteral prostacyclin induction may be more appropriate for patients who need to reach therapeutic dosing more urgently than longer titration durations reported with conventional de novo oral treprostinil initiation. This summary provides strategies utilized in EXPEDITE. Parenteral treprostinil was initiated at 2 ng/kg/min intravenously or subcutaneously; clinicians determined the frequency and dose increment of up-titration. Two distinct transition schedules from parenteral to oral treprostinil were employed: rapid cross-titration in an inpatient setting (median: 2 days) or gradual cross-titration in an outpatient setting (median: 5 days). Patient status was closely monitored after transition; oral treprostinil dose was titrated to clinical effect and tolerability. Factors considered when individualizing dosing strategies included parenteral and oral treprostinil target doses, nursing support, patient education, medication counseling and adverse events management. EXPEDITE demonstrated the time to a therapeutic dose of oral treprostinil is significantly shorter when utilizing a short-term parenteral induction strategy and may be suitable for patients requiring aggressive titration of oral treprostinil., Competing Interests: J. F. Kingrey is part of the speaker bureau for United Therapeutics, Bayer pharmaceuticals, and Janssen Pharmaceuticals, attends advisory boards for United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Janssen, consults for United Therapeutics, Bayer, Janssen, and conducts research for United Therapeutics, Janssen, Acceleron, Gossamer Bio. C. E. Miller is part of the speaker bureau for United Therapeutics, Janssen, and Bayer, attends advisory boards for United Therapeutics and Janssen, consults for United Therapeutics, and conducts clinical research for United Therapeutics, Janssen, Bayer, and Insmed. J. S. Smith serves as a speaker for and has received research funds from Bayer and United Therapeutics. V. Franco has served on advisory boards for United Therapeutics and has supported research for United Therapeutics, Merck, Acceleron, Johnson and Johnson, Respira, Aerovate, Cereno, and Abbott. R. Zolty has received payments for consulting on behalf of United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Janssen/Johnson and Johnson. R. J. Oudiz has received grants from Acceleron/Merck, Gossamer Bio, Insmed, Janssen, and United Therapeutics and honoraria/speaker fees from Merck, Janssen, and United Therapeutics. J. M. Elwing consults for United Therapeutics, Altavant, Aerovate, Bayer, Gossamer Bio, Liquida, and Merck and has received research support and grants from Janssen, United Therapeutics, Liquidia, Phase Bio, Gossamer Bio, Bayer, Acceleron, Altavant, Aerovate, Tenax, and Pharmosa. J. H. Huston has conducted clinical trials for Acceleron, CardiolRx, and Aadi Bioscience. L. Melendres‐Groves has received honoraria and/or fees for consultancy and advisory committees for United Therapeutics Corporation outside of submitted works. A. Ravichandran reports personal fees from United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Actelion outside the submitted work. V. Balasubramanian serves as a consultant for United Therapeutics. B. Wu, S. Hwang, S. Seaman, and M. Broderick are paid employees of United Therapeutics. F. F. Rahaghi has consulted for United Therapeutics, Janssen PH, Merck, and Altavant; served as a speaker for United Therapeutics, Janssen PH, and Bayer; and received research funding from Janssen, Bayer, Merck, Gossamer, and Bellerophon., (© 2023 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of the Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Effective clinical decision-making in initial treatment selection and switching or escalations of therapy for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) depends on multiple factors including the patient's risk profile. Data from clinical trials suggest that switching from a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) to the soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator riociguat may provide clinical benefit in patients not reaching treatment goals. In this review, we cover the clinical evidence for riociguat combination regimens for patients with PAH and discuss their evolving role in upfront combination therapy and switching from a PDE5i as an alternative to escalating therapy. Specifically, we review current evidence which suggests or provides a hypothesis for 1) the potential use of riociguat plus endothelin receptor antagonist combinations for upfront combination therapy in patients with PAH at intermediate to high risk of 1-year mortality and 2) the benefits of switching to riociguat from a PDE5i in patients who are not achieving treatment goals with PDE5i-based dual combination therapy and at intermediate risk., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: F.F.R. reports grants or contracts from Bayer, Janssen PH, and Acceleron; consulting fees from United Therapeutics, Janssen PH, Bayer, and Acceleron; payments or honoraria from United Therapeutics, Janssen PH, and Bayer. The author is Principal Investigator on trials by Janssen PH, Merck, and Gossamer Bio. M.G.T. is the recipient of the Bayer PAH Accelerated Award; has participated in Advisory Boards for United Therapeutics and Bayer; and is the Principal Investigator on trials by Janssen-PH, Bayer, United Therapeutic, and Bellerophon Therapeutics. S.S. reports serving on the speaker panel for Actelion pharmaceuticals, Bayer, and United Therapeutics; and has received honoraria from these entities for consultancy and speaking engagements. Member of a data safety and monitoring board for an industry-sponsored FDA-approved study. The author is Principal Investigator or Sub Investigator on multiple clinical trials sponsored by Actelion and United Therapeutics., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Nontuberculous mycobacterial (NTM) diseases are difficult-to-treat infections, especially in lung transplant (LTx) candidates. Currently, there is a paucity of recommendations on the management of NTM infections in LTx, focusing on Mycobacterium avium complex (MAC), M. abscessus and M. kansasii ., Methods: Pulmonologists, infectious disease specialists, LTx surgeons and Delphi experts with expertise in NTM were recruited. A patient representative was also invited. Three questionnaires comprising questions with multiple response statements were distributed to panellists. Delphi methodology with a Likert scale of 11 points (5 to -5) was applied to define the agreement between experts. Responses from the first two questionnaires were collated to develop a final questionnaire. The consensus was described as a median rating >4 or <-4 indicating for or against the given statement. After the last round of questionnaires, a cumulative report was generated., Results: Panellists recommend performing sputum cultures and a chest computed tomography scan for NTM screening in LTx candidates. Panellists recommend against absolute contraindication to LTx even with multiple positive sputum cultures for MAC, M. abscessus or M. kansasii. Panellists recommend MAC patients on antimicrobial treatment and culture negative can be listed for LTx without further delay. Panellists recommend 6 months of culture-negative for M. kansasii , but 12 months of further treatment from the time of culture-negative for M. abscessus before listing for LTx., Conclusion: This NTM LTx study consensus statement provides essential recommendations for NTM management in LTx and can be utilised as an expert opinion while awaiting evidence-based contributions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: H. Asif, A. Ohsumi, J. Philley, A. Emtiazjoo, T. Hirama, C-C. Shu, F. Silveira, V. Poulin, M. Nagao, P-R. Burgel, S. Hays, T. Kawasaki, C. Dela Cruz, S. Aliberti, T. Nakajima, S. Ruoss, T.K. Marras and G.I. Snell have no conflict to report. F.F. Rahaghi has received research grants, paid to his institution, from Mallinckrodt, outside the submitted work; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, consultation fee events from United Therapeutics, Mallinckrodt and Actelion Pharma, outside the submitted work. P. Rizzuto has received research grants, paid to his institution, from Insmed, regarding the submitted work. T. Aksamit has received payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, consultation fee events from Advanced Respiratory, Inc., outside the submitted work. A.W. Baker has received research grants, paid to his institution, from NIH/NIAID, Insmed and CDC's Prevention Epicenters Program outside the submitted work. K. Winthrop has received restricted research grants, paid to his institution, from E.R Squibb & Sons, Regeneron Pharm and Gentech, outside the submitted work; and payment or honoraria for lectures, presentations, consultation fee events from Insmed, AbbVie, Eli Lilly and WhiteHall, outside the submitted work. M. Mirsaeidi has received research grants, paid to his institution, from Boehringer Ingelheim, Ashvattha and Mallinckrodt, outside the submitted work., (Copyright ©The authors 2023.)

Background: Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, complex, connective tissue disorder. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in SSc, occurring in 35-52% of patients and accounting for 20-40% of mortality. Evolution of therapeutic options has resulted in a lack of consensus on how to manage this condition. This Delphi study was initiated to develop consensus recommendations based on expert physician insights regarding screening, progression, treatment criteria, monitoring of response, and the role of recent therapeutic advances with antifibrotics and immunosuppressants in patients with SSc-ILD., Methods: A modified Delphi process was completed by pulmonologists (n = 13) and rheumatologists (n = 12) with expertise in the management of patients with SSc-ILD. Panelists rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale from - 5 (complete disagreement) to + 5 (complete agreement). Consensus was predefined as a mean Likert scale score of ≤  - 2.5 or ≥  + 2.5 with a standard deviation not crossing zero., Results: Panelists recommended that all patients with SSc be screened for ILD by chest auscultation, spirometry with diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and/or autoantibody testing. Treatment decisions were influenced by baseline and changes in pulmonary function tests, extent of ILD on HRCT, duration and degree of dyspnea, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and potential contribution of reflux. Treatment success was defined as stabilization or improvement of signs or symptoms of ILD and functional status. Mycophenolate mofetil was identified as the initial treatment of choice. Experts considered nintedanib a therapeutic option in patients with progressive fibrotic ILD despite immunosuppressive therapy or patients contraindicated/unable to tolerate immunotherapy. Concomitant use of nintedanib with MMF/cyclophosphamide can be considered in patients with advanced disease at initial presentation, aggressive ILD, or significant disease progression. Although limited consensus was achieved on the use of tocilizumab, the experts considered it a therapeutic option for patients with early SSc and ILD with elevated acute-phase reactants., Conclusions: This modified Delphi study generated consensus recommendations for management of patients with SSc-ILD in a real-world setting. Findings from this study provide a management algorithm that will be helpful for treating patients with SSc-ILD and addresses a significant unmet need., (© 2023. The Author(s).)

Background: Pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a common complication of interstitial lung disease (ILD) and is associated with worse outcomes and increased mortality. Evaluation of PH is recommended in lung transplant candidates, but there are currently no standardized screening approaches. Trials have identified therapies that are effective in this setting, providing another rationale to routinely screen patients with ILD for PH., Research Question: What screening strategies for identifying PH in patients with ILD are supported by expert consensus?, Study Design and Methods: The study convened a panel of 16 pulmonologists with expertise in PH and ILD, and used a modified Delphi consensus process with three surveys to identify PH screening strategies. Survey 1 consisted primarily of open-ended questions. Surveys 2 and 3 were developed from responses to survey 1 and contained statements about PH screening that panelists rated from -5 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree)., Results: Panelists reached consensus on several triggers for suspicion of PH including the following: symptoms, clinical signs, findings on chest CT scan or other imaging, abnormalities in pulse oximetry, elevations in brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) or N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP), and unexplained worsening in pulmonary function tests or 6-min walk distance. Echocardiography and BNP/NT-proBNP were identified as screening tools for PH. Right heart catheterization was deemed essential for confirming PH., Interpretation: Many patients with ILD may benefit from early evaluation of PH now that an approved therapy is available. Protocols to evaluate patients with ILD often overlap with evaluations for pulmonary hypertension-interstitial lung disease and can be used to assess the risk of PH. Because standardized approaches are lacking, this consensus statement is intended to aid physicians in the identification of patients with ILD and possible PH, and provide guidance for timely right heart catheterization., (Copyright © 2022 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Dual combination therapy with a phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitor (PDE5i) and endothelin receptor antagonist is recommended for most patients with intermediate-risk pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH). The RESPITE and REPLACE studies suggest that switching from a PDE5i to a soluble guanylate cyclase (sGC) activator may provide clinical improvement in this situation. The optimal approach to escalation or transition of therapy in this or other scenarios is not well defined. We developed an expert consensus statement on the transition to sGC and other treatment escalations and transitions in PAH using a modified Delphi process. The Delphi process used a panel of 20 physicians with expertise in PAH. Panelists answered three questionnaires on the management of treatment escalations and transitions in PAH. The initial questionnaire included open-ended questions. Later questionnaires consolidated the responses into statements that panelists rated on a Likert scale from -5 ( strongly disagree ) to +5 ( strongly agree ) to determine consensus. The Delphi process produced several consensus recommendations. Escalation should be considered for patients who are at high risk or not achieving treatment goals, by adding an agent from a new class, switching from oral to parenteral prostacyclins, or increasing the dose. Switching to a new class or within a class should be considered if tolerability or other considerations unrelated to efficacy are affecting adherence. Switching from a PDE5i to an SGC activator may benefit patients with intermediate risk who are not improving on their present therapy. These consensus-based recommendations may be helpful to clinicians and beneficial for patients when evidence-based guidance is unavailable., Competing Interests: Franck F. Rahaghi reports consultation, research, and speakership honoraria from Bayer and Janssen, consultation and speakership from United Therapeutics, and consultation fees from Acceleron. Vijay P. Balasubramanian reports a research grant from United Therapeutics and serves on a speakers bureau for Bayer. Robert C. Bourge reports research grant support to my institution from United Therapeutics and Bayer, and service on a Scientific Advisory Board at United Therapeutics. Murali M. Chakinala reports grants or contracts from Actelion/Janssen, Bayer, Medtronic, NIH, Reata, Liquidia, Phase Bio, Complexa, United Therapeutics, Altavant, Trio Health Analytics, Reata, Acceleron, Arena, and Gossamer; consulting fees from Altavant, Vaderis Therapeutics, Aerovate, Reata, VWave, and Arena; honoraria from Bayer, Gilead, Simply Speaking, WebMD, and United Therapeutics; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Actelion/Janssen, United Therapeutics, Bayer, Acceleron, Reata, and Gilead; participation on a Data Safety Monitoring Board or Advisory Board for Actelion/Janssen, Express Scripts, Phase Bio, Altavant, Gossamer, United Therapeutics, Bayer, Acceleron, and Liquidia; and leadership or a fiduciary role in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association and the Cure HHT Global Research and Medical Advisory Board. Michael S. Eggert reports research contracts with United Therapeutics (BREEZE and ADVANCE Outcomes), Acceleron, and Actelion. Jean M. Elwing reports grants from Actelion, Acceleron, Reata, United Therapeutics, Liquidia, Phase Bio, Complexa, Gossamer Bio, Bayer, Arena, Eiger, Akros, Bellerophon, and Lung LLC and consulting fees from United Therapeutics, Acceleron, Liquidia, Altavant, Bayer, Gossamer Bio, Actelion, Bayer. Jeremy Feldman reports consulting and giving talks for Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Jansen. Christopher King reports personal fees from Actelion, personal fees from Genentech, United Therapeutics, and Boehringer Ingelheim; has served on advisory boards for and is on the Speakers’ Bureau of Actelion, Boehringer‐Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, and United Therapeutics. James R. Klinger reports that his institution receives research funding from United Technologies, service on a Steering Committee and a Clinical Outcomes Committee for Bayer, and a leadership role in the Pulmonary Hypertension Association. Stephen C. Mathai reports personal fees from United Therapeutics; participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board from United Therapeutics, Actelion, and Bayer, and leadership or a fiduciary role in the PCORI Rare Disease Advisory Panel and the World Symposium on Pulmonary Hypertension. John Wesley McConnell reports consulting fees from Actelion, Bayer, Gossamer, Altavant, and Liquidia; honoraria from Actelion, Bayer, Simply Speaking, Impact PH, and Reata, and participation on a data safety monitoring board or advisory board for Actelion, Liquidia, Gossamer, and Altavant. Harold I. Palevsky reports honoraria for serving on scientific advisory boards for Acceleron, Actelion/Janssen, PhaseBio and United Therapeutics, and serving on a DSMB for United Therapeutics. Ricardo Restrepo‐Jaramillo reports serving on speaker's bureau for United Therapeutics, Bayer, and Actelion. Zeenat Safdar reports serving on a speakers bureau, consultation and advisory boards for Actelion, United Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bayer, and Roche. Jeffrey S. Sager reports personal fees from Bayer pharmaceuticals, grants and personal fees from United Therapeutics, grants and personal fees from Janssen (J and J), and grants from Reata outside the submitted work. Namita Sood reports a speaking fee from Bayer. Roxana Sulica reports research grants from Bayer, United Therapeutics, Complexa, and Reata, and serves on advisory boards for Actelion, Bayer, United Therapeutics, and Reata. R. James White reports research grants from United Therapeutics, Reata, Bayer, Merck, and Janssen and consulting fees from Merck and Bayer. Nicholas S. Hill reports honoraria from Axon Research for this study; grants to his institution from Actelion, Bayer, Gilead, and United Therapeutics; consulting fees from United Therapeutics; and participation in Data Safety Monitoring Boards for United Therapeutics and Pfizer. All authors had access to the Delphi questionnaire analysis and data and participated in the review, revision, and approval of the content of the manuscript for submission. Charles D. Burger reports no disclosures or conflicts of interest., (© 2022 The Authors. Pulmonary Circulation published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of Pulmonary Vascular Research Institute.)

Background: Riociguat is effective in delaying the time to clinical worsening (TCW) in patients with groups 1 and 4 pulmonary hypertension., Research Question: Is riociguat more effective than placebo in prolonging TCW in sarcoidosis-associated pulmonary hypertension (SAPH)?, Study Design and Methods: This was a double-blind placebo-controlled trial. Patients with SAPH confirmed by right heart catheterization were randomized 1:1 to riociguat or placebo. Patients underwent 6-min walk distance (6MWD) and spirometry testing every 8 weeks. The primary end point was TCW, which was defined by the time to the first of the following: (1) all-cause mortality, (2) need for hospitalization because of worsening cardiopulmonary status attributable to progression of disease, (3) > 50 m decrease in the 6MWD test, or (4) worsening of World Health Organization functional class., Results: A total of 16 patients were randomized to riociguat (n = 8) or placebo (n = 8). No difference was found in pulmonary artery mean, pulmonary vascular resistance, initial 6MWD, or FVC between the two groups. Five of eight patients who received placebo met TCW criteria, whereas none of the patients who received riociguat experienced a qualifying event. By log-rank analysis, patients who received riociguat were in the study for a significantly longer period (χ 2  = 6.259; P = .0124). The 6MWD decreased in the placebo group (median, -55.9 m; range, -176.8 to 60 m), but rose in the riociguat group (median, +42.7 m; range, -7.5 to +91.4 m; P = .0149), with a placebo-corrected difference of 94 m (P < .01). Four of eight patients who received riociguat, but only 1 of 8 patients who received placebo, showed a > 30-m improvement in 6MWD (P > .05). No significant adverse events associated with riociguat occurred., Interpretation: Over the 1 year of the study, riociguat was effective in preventing clinical worsening and improving exercise capacity in patients with SAPH., Trial Registry: ClinicalTrials.gov; No.: NCT02625558; URL: www.clinicaltrials.gov., (Copyright © 2021 American College of Chest Physicians. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Intravenous infusion of alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT) was approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) to treat emphysema associated with AAT deficiency (AATD) in 1987 and there are now several FDA-approved therapy products on the market, all of which are derived from pooled human plasma. Intravenous AAT therapy has proven clinical efficacy in slowing the decline of lung function associated with AATD progression; however, it is only recommended for individuals with the most severe forms of AATD as there is a lack of evidence that this treatment is effective in treating wild-type heterozygotes (e.g., PI*MS and PI*MZ genotypes), for which the prevalence may be much higher than previously thought. There are large numbers of individuals that are currently left untreated despite displaying symptoms of AATD. Furthermore, not all countries offer AAT augmentation therapy due to its expense and inconvenience for patients. More cost-effective treatments are now being sought that show efficacy for less severe forms of AATD and many new therapeutic technologies are being investigated, such as gene repair and other interference strategies, as well as the use of chemical chaperones. New sources of AAT are also being investigated to ensure there are enough supplies to meet future demand, and new methods of assessing response to treatment are being evaluated. There is currently extensive research into AATD and its treatment, and this chapter aims to highlight important emerging treatment strategies that aim to improve the lives of patients with AATD., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement: FFR is a consultant, speaker, and researcher for Takeda and Grifols, and a consultant for CSL Behring., (© The Author(s), 2021.)

Purpose: Clinicians may transition patients on parenteral or inhaled prostacyclins to oral treprostinil for ease of use or to avoid adverse effects related to parenteral therapy. However, few data are available to guide these transitions in inpatients. The purpose of this analysis is to describe the inpatient initiation of oral treprostinil at an academic medical system., Methods: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients newly initiated on oral treprostinil at Cleveland Clinic Heath System from 2015 to 2017. Demographic information regarding pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH) history and previous PAH therapies were recorded. Outcomes evaluated included doses of oral treprostinil utilized, adverse effects related to therapy, and measures of clinical and functional status before and after the initiation of oral treprostinil., Results: Overall, 29 patients were prescribed oral treprostinil, of which 15 patients were included in the analysis. Common reasons for initiation of oral treprostinil included disease progression (6, 40%) and patient desire (4, 25%). The median duration of transition/initiation of oral treprostinil was 4 days (range, 3-11 days). Median daily dose of oral treprostinil on day 1 of initiation was 2 mg (0.25-4 mg). By day 7, median daily dose was 15 mg (0.75-27.75 mg). Common adverse effects related to therapy were gastrointestinal (7, 47%) and headache (4, 27%). No patients required discontinuation of oral treprostinil due to adverse effects within 90 days of initiation., Conclusion: Inpatient initiation/transition to oral treprostinil was relatively well tolerated. Future studies should evaluate clinical outcomes surrounding the transitioning to oral treprostinil.

Background: In patients with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) treated with pirfenidone (Esbriet®, Genentech USA, Inc. South San Francisco, CA.), effectively managing treatment-related adverse events (AEs) may improve adherence. Due to a lack of clinical evidence and expertise, managing these AEs can be challenging for patients and physicians alike. In the absence of evidence, consensus recommendations from physicians experienced in using pirfenidone to treat IPF are beneficial., Methods: Using a modified Delphi process, expert recommendations were developed by a panel of physicians experienced with using pirfenidone for IPF. Over three iterations, panelists developed and refined a series of statements on the use of pirfenidone in IPF. Their agreement on each statement was ranked using a Likert scale., Results: A panel of 12 physicians participated and developed a total of 286 statements on dosing and administration, special populations, drug-drug interactions, laboratory analysis, warnings and precautions, and AE management. Expert recommendations were achieved with regard to slower initial titrations and slower titrations for AEs, dosing with meal(s) or substantial meals, and adding other prescribed pharmacological agents for AEs., Conclusion: Until there is further clinical evidence, the resulting consensus recommendations are intended to provide direction on the practical management of IPF with pirfenidone, by encompassing a broad experience from the real world to complement data gleaned from clinical trials.

A variety of phenotypic categorisations have been developed for sarcoidosis. Phenotyping has been used for genetics studies and to guide treatment selection. The authors participated in a Delphi expert consensus panel to develop a proposed phenotype categorisation and treatment recommendations for pulmonary sarcoidosis patients. Panellists reached consensus that asymptomatic patients with normal pulmonary function and adenopathy alone or normal chest imaging do not require therapy, while symptomatic patients with impaired pulmonary function or infiltrates should be treated. The panel did not reach consensus on asymptomatic patients with abnormal chest imaging or reduced pulmonary function, or symptomatic patients with normal chest imaging and pulmonary function. The proposed phenotype categories and associated treatment recommendations are asymptomatic (no therapy), acute (disease duration <1-2 years, apparently self-limited, corticosteroids), chronic (antimetabolites and other second-line therapies) and advanced (biologics). Some clinical settings, such as dyspnoea/hypoxaemia at rest, severely impaired or rapidly decreasing pulmonary function tests, and severe cardiac, neurologic, ocular or renal involvement warrant immediate therapy., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: R.P. Baughman reports grants and personal fees from Malllinckrodt, Novartis and Celgene, grants from Gilead, Genentech and Bayer, and personal fees from West Pharmaceutical, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: M.B. Scholand reports other from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Fibrogen and Global Blood Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. In addition, M.B. Scholand has a patent Apparatus, Compositions and Methods for Assessment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Progression among Rapid and Slow Decline Conditions issued. Conflict of interest: F.F. Rahaghi reports grants and consulting fees from Mallinckrodt, during the conduct of the study., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

In patients treated with repository corticotrophin injection (RCI) for pulmonary sarcoidosis, effective management of adverse events may improve adherence. However, management of adverse events may be challenging due to limitations in real-world clinical experience with RCI and available published guidelines.We surveyed 12 physicians with a modified Delphi process using three questionnaires. Questionnaire 1 consisted of open-ended questions. Panellists' answers were developed into a series of statements for Questionnaires 2 and 3. In these, physicians rated their agreement with the statements using a Likert scale.Key consensus recommendations included a starting dose of 40 units twice a week for patients with less severe disease, continued at a maintenance dose for patients who responded, particularly those with chronic refractory sarcoidosis. Panellists reached consensus that concomitant steroids should be quickly tapered in patients receiving RCI, but that concomitant use of immunosuppressive medications should be continued. Panellists developed consensus recommendations for adverse event management, and reached consensus that RCI should be down-titrated or discontinued if other interventions for the adverse effects fail or if the adverse effect is severe.In the absence of clinical evidence, our Delphi consensus opinions may provide practical guidance to physicians on the management of RCI to treat pulmonary sarcoidosis., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: F.F. Rahaghi reports grants and consulting fees from Mallinckrodt, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: N.J. Sweiss has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L.A. Saketkoo has nothing to declare. Conflict of interest: M.B. Scholand reports other from Boehringer Ingelheim, Genentech, Fibrogen and Global Blood Therapeutics, outside the submitted work. In addition, M.B. Scholand has a patent Apparatus, Compositions and Methods for Assessment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Progression among Rapid and Slow Decline Conditions issued. Conflict of interest: J.B. Barney has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.K. Gerke has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.E. Lower has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Mirsaeidi reports grants and personal fees from Mallinckrodt, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. O'Hare has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: M.J. Rumbak has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L. Samavati has participated in a Questcor Advisory Board Meeting in 2014 and received $6500 compensation. Conflict of interest: R.P. Baughman reports grants and personal fees from Malllinckrodt, Novartis and Celgene, grants from Gilead, Genentech and Bayer, personal fees from West Pharmaceutical, during the conduct of the study., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Pulmonary sarcoidosis presents substantial management challenges, with limited evidence on effective therapies and phenotypes. In the absence of definitive evidence, expert consensus can supply clinically useful guidance in medicine. An international panel of 26 experts participated in a Delphi process to identify consensus on pharmacological management in sarcoidosis with the development of preliminary recommendations.The modified Delphi process used three rounds. The first round focused on qualitative data collection with open-ended questions to ensure comprehensive inclusion of expert concepts. Rounds 2 and 3 applied quantitative assessments using an 11-point Likert scale to identify consensus.Key consensus points included glucocorticoids as initial therapy for most patients, with non-biologics (immunomodulators), usually methotrexate, considered in severe or extrapulmonary disease requiring prolonged treatment, or as a steroid-sparing intervention in cases with high risk of steroid toxicity. Biologic therapies might be considered as additive therapy if non-biologics are insufficiently effective or are not tolerated with initial biologic therapy, usually with a tumour necrosis factor-α inhibitor, typically infliximab.The Delphi methodology provided a platform to gain potentially valuable insight and interim guidance while awaiting evidenced-based contributions., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest: F.F. Rahaghi reports grants and consulting fees from Mallinckrodt, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: R.P. Baughman reports grants and personal fees from Malllinckrodt, Novartis and Celgene, grants from Gilead, Genentech, Bayer and West Pharmaceutical, during the conduct of the study. Conflict of interest: L.A. Saketkoo has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N.J. Sweiss has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.B. Barney has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S.S. Birring has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: U. Costabel has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.D. Crouser has no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Conflict of interest: M. Drent has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: A.K. Gerke has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: J.C. Grutters has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: N.Y. Hamzeh has a patent pending from Prothena Inc. Conflict of interest: I. Huizar has no relevant conflicts of interest to disclose. Conflict of interest: W.E. James has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Kalra has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: S. Kullberg has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: H. Li has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.E. Lower has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: L.A. Maier reports grants from National Institutes of Health: 1R01 HL127461-01A, 1R01HL11487-01A1, R01HL136681-01A1, 1R21 128738A-02, R21 HL140012-1, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M. Mirsaeidi reports grants and personal fees from Mallinckrodt, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: J. Müller-Quernheim has nothing to disclose. Conflict of interest: E.M. Carmona Porquera reports other from ReSaph (Gilead), personal fees from American College of Chest Physicians (CHEST), outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: L. Samavati participated in the Questcor Advisory Board Meeting 2014 and received $6500 compensation. Conflict of interest: D. Valeyre reports personal fees from Roche, Boehringer Ingelheim, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. Conflict of interest: M.B. Scholand reports other from Boehringer Ingelheim, Fibrogen, Global Blood Therapeutics and Genetech, outside the submitted work. In addition, M.B. Scholand has a patent Apparatus, Compositions and Methods for Assessment of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Progression among Rapid and Slow Decline Conditions issued., (Copyright ©ERS 2020.)

Riociguat is a soluble guanylate cyclase stimulator that has been approved for the treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension and inoperable chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension or persistent/recurrent pulmonary hypertension following pulmonary endarterectomy. Riociguat is administered using an 8-week individual dose-adjustment scheme whereby a patient initially receives riociguat 1.0 mg three times daily (tid), and the dose is then increased every 2 weeks in the absence of hypotension, indicated by systolic blood pressure measurements and symptoms, up to a maximum dose of 2.5 mg tid. The established riociguat dose-adjustment scheme allows the dose of riociguat to be individually optimized in terms of tolerability and efficacy. The majority of patients in the phase III clinical trials and their long-term extension phases achieved the maximum riociguat dose, whereas some patients remained on lower doses. There is evidence that these patients may experience benefits at riociguat doses lower than 2.5 mg tid, with improvement in exercise capacity being observed after only 2-4 weeks of treatment in the phase III studies and in the exploratory 1.5 mg-maximum patient group of PATENT-1. This review aims to provide an overview of the rationale behind the riociguat dose-adjustment scheme and examine its application to both clinical trials and real-life clinical practice., (Copyright © 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

In patients treated with macitentan (Opsumit®, Actelion Pharmaceuticals Ltd., Basel, Switzerland) for pulmonary arterial hypertension (PAH), prevention and/or effective management of treatment-related adverse events may improve adherence. However, management of these adverse events can be challenging and the base of evidence and clinical experience for macitentan is limited. In the absence of evidence, consensus recommendations from physicians experienced in using macitentan to treat PAH may benefit patients and physicians who are using macitentan. Consensus recommendations were developed by a panel of physicians experienced with macitentan and PAH using a modified Delphi process. Over three iterations, panelists developed and refined a series of statements on the use of macitentan in PAH and rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale. The panel of 18 physicians participated and developed a total of 118 statements on special populations, add-on therapy, drug-drug interactions, warnings and precautions, hospitalization and functional class, and adverse event management. The resulting consensus recommendations are intended to provide practical guidance on real-world issues in using macitentan to treat patients with PAH.

Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a common hereditary disorder caused by mutations in the SERPINA1 gene, which encodes alpha-1 antitrypsin (AAT; also known as alpha 1-proteinase inhibitor, A 1 -PI). An important function of A 1 -PI in the lung is to inhibit neutrophil elastase, one of various proteolytic enzymes released by activated neutrophils during inflammation. Absence or deficiency of A 1 -PI leads to an imbalance between elastase and anti-elastase activity, which results in progressive, irreversible destruction of lung tissue, and ultimately the development of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease with early-onset emphysema. AATD is under-diagnosed, patients can experience long delays before obtaining an accurate diagnosis, and the consequences of delayed diagnosis or misdiagnosis can be severe. Currently, A 1 -PI therapy is the only available treatment that addresses disease etiology in patients with AATD; however, demonstrating clinical efficacy of A 1 -PI therapy is challenging. In order to show therapeutic efficacy with traditional endpoints such as forced expiratory volume in one second and mortality, large sample sizes and longer duration trials are required. However, AATD is a rare, slow progressive disease, which can take decades to manifest clinically and recruiting sufficient numbers of patients into prolonged placebo-controlled trials remains a significant obstacle. Despite this, the Randomized, placebo-controlled trial of augmentation therapy in Alpha 1-Proteinase Inhibitor Deficiency (RAPID) and RAPID Extension trial, the largest clinical program completed to date, utilized quantitative chest computed tomography as a sensitive and specific measure of the extent of emphysema. Findings from the RAPID/RAPID Extension program definitively confirmed the benefits of A 1 -PI therapy in slowing disease progression and provided evidence of a disease-modifying effect of A 1 -PI therapy in patients with AATD. These findings suggest that the early introduction of treatment in patients with severe emphysema-related AATD may delay the time to death, lung transplantation or crippling respiratory complaints. In addition, there is now limited evidence that A 1 -PI therapy provides a gain of more than five life-years, supporting previous observations based on registry data. With the clinical efficacy of A 1 -PI therapy now demonstrated, further studies are required to assess long-term outcomes.

Oral treprostinil was recently labeled for treatment of pulmonary arterial hypertension. Similar to the period immediately after parenteral treprostinil was approved, there is a significant knowledge gap for practicing physicians who might prescribe oral treprostinil. Despite its oral route of delivery, use of the drug is challenging because of the requirement for careful titration and management of drug-related adverse effects. We aimed to create a consensus document combining available evidence with expert opinion to provide guidance for use of oral treprostinil. Following a methodology commonly used in business and social sciences (the 'Delphi Process'), two investigators from the oral treprostinil (Freedom) studies created a series of statements based on available evidence and the package insert. The set of 'best practice' statements was circulated to nine other Freedom trial investigators. Their comments were incorporated into the document as new line items for further vote and comment. The subsequent document was put to vote line by line (scale of -5 to +5) and a final statement was drafted. Consensus recommendations include initial therapy with 0.125 mg for treatment naÿ patients, three times daily dosing, aggressive use of antidiarrheal medication, and a strong preference for use of the drug in combination with other approved PAH therapies. This process was particularly valuable in providing guidance for the management of adverse events (where essentially no data is available). The Delphi process was useful to codify investigator experience and subsequently develop investigator consensus about practical issues for physicians who may wish to prescribe oral treprostinil.

In patients who require urgent initiation of pulmonary arterial hypertension medications due to disease progression, it is customary to start intravenous prostacyclin therapy, typically during a hospital admission. If there are complicating factors or relative contraindications to intravenous and subcutaneous prostanoids, oral treprostinil provides another pathway to prostanoid therapy, but this usually requires a prolonged titration. We describe the case of a thirty-six-year-old male with severe pulmonary arterial hypertension and contraindication to intravenous and subcutaneous prostanoid therapy due to congenital deafness and the risk of not hearing the intravenous pump alarms. Intravenous treprostinil was initiated, titrated to high dose, and then rapidly transitioned to oral treprostinil. A rapid initiation, titration, and transition from intravenous to oral treprostinil can be safely performed under watchful supervision in order to achieve higher and more efficacious doses of oral treprostinil in a timely manner.

We aimed to adapt the shared medical appointment (SMA) model to the care of pulmonary hypertension (PH) patients and evaluate patient satisfaction. Our SMA team included a PH specialist, a PH nurse, and one research fellow. Eight to twelve PH patients with a family member were invited during office visits and by phone calls. Attendance was verified and encouraged by phone calls and informational letters. The meetings started with a 30-minute presentation on various PH topics, which was followed by each patient's individual visit and a focused examination in front of the group, allowing group questions and interaction. Of the total number of patients (n = 53), 84% stated that they would attend a future SMA. The care provided was rated excellent to very good by 98% of the patients. Ninety-two percent stated that they improved their understanding of the disease and treatment options, and 59% acknowledged a preference for the group visit over the private visit. Twenty-five percent of patients stated that they were very likely to likely to some extent to agree to change or seek a change in treatment modality on the basis of conversation with other patients in the SMA. The majority of our patients expressed no privacy concerns before the meeting (76%), and even more expressed no such concerns afterward (88%). In conclusion, the SMA model allows PH patients to increase understanding of their disease process while integrating peer support, promoting social interaction, and addressing patients' emotional needs. Other (rare) pulmonary diseases may benefit from this model.

A 31-year-old postal worker was diagnosed with bilateral thoracic outlet syndrome and scheduled for the first of two surgeries. The first procedure involved removal of the right first cervical rib, anterior and middle scalenes. On postoperative day 4, he developed shortness of breath. Chest radiograph showed a new pleural effusion on the right. Thoracentesis revealed a yellowish-red thick effusion. Based on the initial look of the fluid it was thought to be a haemorrhagic effusion with a purulent component, further testing revealed that he had developed a chylothorax. The patient was placed on a medium-chain triglyceride diet followed by chest tube drainage. After one day, the chest tube was removed due to minimal drainage, and he was discharged home the next day. Keeping this patient without food, on total parental nutrition, or pursuing surgical intervention was not necessary, as he had an excellent outcome from a very rare surgical complication.

Introduction: Alpha-1 antitrypsin deficiency (AATD) is a genetic disease that may be manifested by chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Despite professional society guidelines that recommend broad testing of at-risk individuals, fewer than 10% of affected individuals have been identified. The goals of this study were to estimate the frequency of abnormal AAT genotypes among patients found to have fixed airflow obstruction and to assess the feasibility of having Pulmonary Function Laboratory personnel administer the study., Methods: Nineteen medical centers in the United States participated in the study. Eligible patients (> GOLD II, FEV(1)/FVC ratio < 0.7, with post-bronchodilator FEV(1)<80% predicted) were offered testing for AATD by the Pulmonary Function Laboratory personnel at the time of pulmonary function testing., Results: A total of 3,457 patients were tested, of whom 3152 were eligible. Deficient patients (ZZ, SZ) constituted 0.63% of subjects, while 10.88% were carriers (MS, MZ). Neither demographic (except African-American race) nor post-bronchodilator pulmonary function variables (FEV(1), FVC, FEV(1)/FVC ratio, TLC, and FEV(1)/FVC) allowed us to predict AAT heterozygote or deficiency status., Conclusions: The prevalence of AATD among patients undergoing pulmonary function tests with fixed airflow obstruction was 0.63%. Pulmonary Function Laboratory personnel effectively conducted the study.