Although the majority of newly reported cases of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)/AIDS in the United States are among men who have sex with men (MSM) and up to 35% of women in the United States have engaged in receptive anal intercourse, little attention has focused on developing topical HIV microbicides for rectal use [1, 2]. Vaginal microbicides in development should also be evaluated for rectal safety (if not efficacy), since it is probable that any HIV microbicide developed for vaginal use will be used rectally. Experience from the COL-1492 trial, a large-scale vaginal microbicide trial using nonoxynol-9 (N-9), demonstrates that the failure to fully understand the potential local toxicities of an HIV microbicide formulation can impact efficacy and result in an increased risk of HIV transmission [3]. N-9 had been shown to cause mucosal erosions in the vagina and rectum, which has been postulated as a partial explanation for the increased HIV transmission rate in the COL-1492 study [4–8]. A large-scale trial of vaginally applied cellulose sulfate was halted when interim analysis indicated a higher HIV infection rate in the treatment group (although subsequent statistical analysis did not demonstrate the same degree of significance as the interim analysis) [9]. In vitro studies indicate that cellulose sulfate may disrupt cellular junctions in the mucosal epithelium, facilitating HIV translocation across the epithelium [10]. The possible role of microbicide-induced mucosal toxicity highlights the need to understand the potential for toxicity early in microbicide development. To facilitate microbicide development, a simple, noninvasive, quantitative measure of altered colonic mucosal integrity is needed to assess the potential for altered mucosal integrity. Challenges to mucosal integrity may result during clinical studies, either from chemical stress due to the microbicide product (vehicle or active ingredient), physical stress (sigmoidoscopic biopsy), or sexual intercourse. These stresses may occur in microbicide development studies and have the potential to confound safety assessments. N-9, used in this study as a chemical stressor, is associated with inflammatory changes evidenced by colposcopically visible erythema, proinflammatory cytokine release, and lamina propria CD8+ lymphocyte and macrophage infiltration [7, 8, 11]. These changes may occur in the absence of visible mucosal damage, although erosions are also seen. Phillips et al have demonstrated that rectal administration of N-9 is associated with shedding of sheets of epithelia (the single layer of cells lining the rectal mucosal surface) 15 minutes after dosing, possibly increasing the likelihood of HIV transmission [12, 13]. Epithelial repair from a single dose of N-9 also occurs rapidly, with an intact epithelial barrier observed 2 hours after N-9 administration and an epithelial appearance indistinguishable from baseline by 8 hours after administration. [13, 14]. Sigmoidoscopic sampling of the colonic mucosa, with or without simulated coital activity, may be performed during microbicide development to understand the pharmacokinetics or toxicity of a candidate microbicide or vehicle. Even without the trauma of endoscopic biopsies, endoscopy has been observed to occasionally induce submucosal bruising, with elevation of the mucosal layer and submucosal hemorrhage. Furthermore, the shearing and compressive forces associated with rectal intercourse might alter the epithelial layer. During rectal microbicide development, it is essential to understand whether such procedures or coital shearing stress may adversely affect the rectum by altering mucosal permeability, so that one can appropriately interpret the effects of topical microbicides on the mucosal lining of the distal colon. Altered permeability is commonly tested by measuring the differential intestinal absorption of solutes of varying molecular weight [15–20]. These tests have been used primarily to evaluate small intestine permeability after oral administration of the test agent, but they have not been used to assess permeability in the rectum, where absorption is very low. A few reports involving comparisons of healthy volunteers with individuals with inflammatory bowel disease or other conditions with altered intestinal permeability suggest that radioisotope chelates administered intrarectally can distinguish differences in distal colon permeability [20–24]. We sought to determine whether a small radiolabeled molecule, 99mtechnetium–diethylene triamine pentaacetic acid (99mTc-DTPA), can be used as a noninvasive measure of colonic mucosal permeability induced either by a known toxin, N-9, or by a combination of coital simulation and flexible sigmoidoscopy with multiple biopsies. We hypothesized that mucosal damage is measurable by simple tests of altered rectal permeability, whether due to inflammatory changes or the physical disruption of the mucosal barrier, both of which occur after N-9 administration, or due to the physical trauma of coital forces and colonic biopsy.