Search

Uncertainty exists re risk:benefit of proximal intestinal exclusion with EB, a novel endoscopic duodenal jejunal liner device for obesity, both with and without diabetes. In view of this, during 2017, an independent, secure, on line registry was established under the auspices of the Association of British Clinical Diabetologists, for the collection of safety and efficacy data worldwide. As of December 2021, data had been entered on 10patients {age 52.1 ± 10.3 year, 53% male, 87% diabetes, BMI 41.1 ± 8.9 kg/m2} and showed many benefits (Table 1) . There were 43 (4.2%) SAEs and 139 (13.9%) less serious AEs (Table 2) . All SAE patients made a full recovery and most derived significant benefit. The benefits of EB therapy are likely to reduce the complications of diabetes. This international data from the EB registry suggests that the likely benefits of EB, far outweigh the risks Disclosure R.E.J. Ryder: None. J.P. Teare: None. A. Ruban: None. M. Haluzik: Advisory Panel; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Abbott Diabetes, AstraZeneca, Lilly Diabetes, Novartis AG. L. Munro: None. H. Frydenberg: None. J.J. McMaster: None. S. Fishman: None. R.V. Cohen: Advisory Panel; GI Dynamics. Research Support; Johnson & Johnson, Medtronic. C.M. Aboud: None. G.J. Holtmann: Research Support; AbbVie Inc., Allergan, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bayer, Bristol Myers, Datapharm Australia Pty Ltd Commonwealth Laboratories, Pty Limited, Eli Lilly Australia Pty Limited, F.Hoffmann-La Roche Limited, Falk Foundation, Falk GmbH and Co Kg, GI Therapies Pty Ltd, Gilead Sciences Pty Limited, MedImmune Ltd Celgene Pty Limited, Mylan, Nestle Pty Ltd, Prometheus Laboratories, Quintiles Pty Limited, Servatus, Takeda Development Center Asia, Pty Ltd, Vital Food Processors Ltd. C. de Jonge: None. J. Greve: Advisory Panel; GI Dynamics. Other Relationship; Bariatric Solutions International, Ethicon, Inc. J.C. Mason: None. H. Sourij: Advisory Panel; AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Daiichi Sankyo, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk. Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Sanofi. Speaker's Bureau; Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk. R. Drummond: Research Support; Fractyl Health, Inc. Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company. B. McGowan: Advisory Panel; Johnson & Johnson, Lilly, Novo Nordisk. Research Support; Novo Nordisk. Speaker's Bureau; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk. Stock/Shareholder; Reset Health. S.A. Amiel: Advisory Panel; Medtronic, Novo Nordisk. Other Relationship; Sanofi. M. Yadagiri: None. P. Sen Gupta: None. K. Laubner: None. J. Seufert: Advisory Panel; Abbott, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH. Research Support; Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH. Speaker's Bureau; Abbott Diabetes, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly, Novo Nordisk, Sanofi-Aventis Deutschland GmbH. Funding Association of British Clinical Diabetologists

Background: Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic skin disease characterized by dry skin, severe itching, inflammation and impaired quality of life. Moisturizing is an integral part of treatment for AD, but its potential for prevention of AD is unclear. Objective: To evaluate whether the early use of emollients in infancy can prevent later development of AD. Methods: We searched Medline, Embase, Web of Science, PubMed, Cochrane Library and other databases to collect randomized controlled trials on early use of emollients in infants for a meta-analysis. Results: Nine articles were included. The OR value for incidence rate was 0.7 (95% CI: 0.48–1.01). No significant publication bias was found by Egger’s test. The sensitivity analysis indicated that the final conclusion was reliable. Conclusions: We found that the difference in incidence rate of AD between the experimental and control groups was not statistically significant. However, due to different methods of using emollients, different follow-up times and different sample sizes included in this meta-analysis, a definitive conclusion could not be reached in this study. In the future, it is still necessary to carry out randomized controlled, multicenter, large-sample trials with an excellent study design and high methodological quality on early application of emollients in high-risk infants to prevent AD.

AIMS The duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL) is an endoscopic device mimicking surgical duodenal-jejunal bypass, and is indicated for the treatment of obesity-associated type 2 diabetes mellitus. This analysis was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and safety of the DJBL in comparison to lifestyle changes and antidiabetic drugs. MATERIALS AND METHODS To determine the efficacy and long-term safety of the DJBL, data concerning 235 obese patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus from the German DJBL registry were analysed. For comparison with standard treatment, propensity-score-matching with patients from the German DPV registry, including the matching parameters sex, age, diabetes duration, baseline BMI and baseline HbA1c, was applied. The final matched cohort consisted of 111 patients in the DJBL group and 222 matched control DPV patients. RESULTS Mean treatment time with the DJBL was 47.5 ± 12.2 weeks, mean BMI reduction was 5.0 kg/m2 (P

A novel-approach for treatment of obesity and diabetes mellitus type 2 (T2DM) is represented by the endoscopic duodenal-jejunal bypass liner (DJBL). Recent data from the German DJBL registry provide evidence for substantial efficacy of the DJBL during the implantation period in obese patients with T2DM. However, little is known about the trends of glycemic control, BMI, and comorbidities after explantation of the DJBL, which have been investigated in the registry in this report. Patients were selected from the registry if they had a dataset at implantation, explantation, and at least one time point after explantation of the DJBL (n = 77). We also investigated a subgroup of patients with available data at least 1 year (–2 weeks) after explantation of the DJBL (n = 32). For a mean BMI at implantation and a mean follow-up period, an increase of BMI of 2.1 kg/m2 (CI 0.8–3.2; p = 0.013) had to be expected (for HbA1c 0.3% (CI − 0.0–0.7; p = n.s.), respectively). In the subgroup analysis, HbA1c and BMI increased after explantation of the DJBL but stayed significantly below baseline levels. Meanwhile, the mean number of antidiabetic drugs slightly increased. There was deterioration seen for blood pressure and LDL cholesterol over the postexplantation period to approximately baseline levels (or higher). With this data, we show that improvement of HbA1c and BMI can be partly maintained over a time of nearly 1-year postexplantation of the DJBL. However, for HbA1c, this may be biased by intensified medical treatment and effects deteriorated with time after explantation. These results suggest that implantation of the DJBL needs to be integrated in a long-term weight management program as most of other interventions in obese patients with T2DM. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02731859