Search

Purpose: To test the hypothesis that the efficacy and toxicity of suramin in the treatment of patients with hormone-refractory prostate cancer was dose dependent., Patients and Methods: Patients were randomized with equal probability to receive low-, intermediate-, or high-dose suramin (total doses 3.192, 5.320, and 7.661 g/m(2), respectively). Overall survival, time to progression, and response rate (prostate-specific antigen [PSA] and objective) for each treatment arm were compared. Relationships between plasma suramin concentrations and response, toxicity, and survival were also evaluated., Results: Three hundred ninety patients were randomized. For the low-, intermediate-, and high-dose arms, the median survival time was 16, 14, and 13 months, respectively (P =.49). The objective response rate was 9%, 7%, and 15%, respectively (P =.10). PSA response rates were 24%, 28%, and 34%, respectively (P =.082). Landmark analyses of a 50% decline in PSA at 20 weeks showed a significant correlation with survival. There was a dose-response relationship between dose and toxicity. After adjusting for treatment arm, the measured suramin concentration was not associated with clinical response, PSA response, survival, or toxicity., Conclusion: Although high-dose suramin was associated with higher objective and PSA response rates, these were not statistically significant. Overall, no dose-response relationship was observed for survival or progression-free survival, but toxicity was increased with the higher dose. Patients treated with the low-dose level experienced modest toxicity, making it the preferred arm on this study. The lack of a dose-response relationship and the toxicity profile observed raise questions regarding the utility of suramin, particularly high-dose suramin, as administered on this schedule.

Background: Mitoxantrone in combination with a low-dose glucocorticoid has been shown to produce more favorable outcomes among men with hormone-refractory prostate carcinoma than glucocorticoid alone. Therefore, the authors sought to determine the safety and activity of higher doses of mitoxantrone in combination with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and a glucocorticoid in preparation for a possible Phase III trial comparing standard to dose-escalated mitoxantrone., Methods: This Phase II trial enrolled 45 patients from October 1996 to March 1998. Twenty-one patients without pelvic irradiation (Arm I) received 21 mg/m(2) of mitoxantrone every 3 weeks, and 24 patients who had received pelvic irradiation (Arm II) were given 17 mg/m(2) on the same schedule. All patients received 40 mg of hydrocortisone in divided doses daily and GM-CSF at 500 microg/daily for a minimum of 10 days per cycle beginning on the third day of the cycle., Results: In Arm I, 33% of assessable patients achieved a partial response, 50% had a > or = 50% decline in their PSA, and 35% had a > or = 75% decline in PSA values. The comparable numbers in Arm II were 24%, 48%, and 35%, respectively. The median survival times were 12 months in Arm I and 14 months in Arm II. Treatment had to be discontinued in 13% of patients because of thrombocytopenia. No other significant toxicities were encountered., Conclusions: Higher doses of mitoxantrone (17 and 21 mg/m(2)) were associated with activity comparable to many estramustine combinations and generally were well tolerated. However, because the degree and frequency of thrombocytopenia were greater than that observed with standard dose mitoxantrone (12-14 mg/m(2)), and because the median survival is apparently comparable to standard dose mitoxantrone, this approach to HRPC cannot be recommended for Phase III testing., (Copyright 2002 American Cancer Society. DOI 10.1002/cncr.10217)