Search

Cytomegalovirus (CMV) is the most common virus associated with congenital infection worldwide and is a major cause of sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL) and developmental delay. Up to 90% of infants with congenital CMV (cCMV) infection are asymptomatic at birth, making the diagnosis challenging.

The SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant has caused infections among individuals vaccinated or with prior COVID-19, suggesting immune escape. Here, we showed a decrease in binding and surrogate neutralizing antibody responses to the Omicron variant after 2 doses of the Pfizer COVID-19 mRNA vaccine. Individuals recovered from infection before vaccination had higher antibody levels and avidity to the Omicron variant compared to individuals vaccinated without infection. This suggested that COVID-19 infection before vaccination elicited a higher magnitude and affinity antibody response to the Omicron variant, and repeated exposure through infection or vaccine may be required to improve immunity to emerging SARS-CoV-2 variants.

BACKGROUND: Estimates of rotavirus vaccine effectiveness (VE) in the United States appear higher in years with more rotavirus activity. We hypothesized rotavirus VE is constant over time but appears to vary as a function of temporal variation in local rotavirus cases and/or misclassified diagnoses. METHODS: We analyzed 6 years of data from eight US surveillance sites on 8- to 59-month olds with acute gastroenteritis symptoms. Children’s stool samples were tested via enzyme immunoassay (EIA); rotavirus-positive results were confirmed with molecular testing at the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. We defined rotavirus gastroenteritis cases by either positive on-site EIA results alone or positive EIA with Centers for Disease Control and Prevention confirmation. For each case definition, we estimated VE against any rotavirus gastroenteritis, moderate-to-severe disease, and hospitalization using two mixed-effect regression models: the first including year plus a year–vaccination interaction, and the second including the annual percent of rotavirus-positive tests plus a percent positive–vaccination interaction. We used multiple overimputation to bias-adjust for misclassification of cases defined by positive EIA alone. RESULTS: Estimates of annual rotavirus VE against all outcomes fluctuated temporally, particularly when we defined cases by on-site EIA alone and used a year–vaccination interaction. Use of confirmatory testing to define cases reduced, but did not eliminate, fluctuations. Temporal fluctuations in VE estimates further attenuated when we used a percent positive–vaccination interaction. Fluctuations persisted until bias-adjustment for diagnostic misclassification. CONCLUSIONS: Both controlling for time-varying rotavirus activity and bias-adjusting for diagnostic misclassification are critical for estimating the most valid annual rotavirus VE.

Enterovirus D68 (EV-D68) is associated with a broad spectrum of illnesses, including mild to severe acute respiratory illness (ARI) and acute flaccid myelitis (AFM). Enteroviruses, including EV-D68, are typically detected in the United States during late summer through fall, with year-to-year fluctuations. Before 2014, EV-D68 was infrequently reported to CDC (1). However, numbers of EV-D68 detection have increased in recent years, with a biennial pattern observed during 2014-2018 in the United States, after the expansion of surveillance and wider availability of molecular testing. In 2014, a national outbreak of EV-D68 was detected (2). EV-D68 was also reported in 2016 via local (3) and passive national (4) surveillance. EV-D68 detections were limited in 2017, but substantial circulation was observed in 2018 (5). To assess recent levels of circulation, EV-D68 detections in respiratory specimens collected from patients aged18 years* with ARI evaluated in emergency departments (EDs) or admitted to one of seven U.S. medical centers

Antiviral treatment is recommended for all hospitalized children with suspected or confirmed influenza, regardless of their risk profile. Few data exist on adherence to these recommendations, so we sought to determine factors associated with influenza testing and antiviral treatment in children.Hospitalized children18 years of age with acute respiratory illness (ARI) were enrolled through active surveillance at pediatric medical centers in seven cities between 11/1/2015 and 6/30/2016; clinical information was obtained from parent interview and chart review. We used generalized linear mixed-effects models to identify factors associated with influenza testing and antiviral treatment.Of the 2299 hospitalized children with ARI enrolled during one influenza season, 51% (n = 1183) were tested clinically for influenza. Clinicians provided antiviral treatment for 61 of 117 (52%) patients with a positive influenza test versus 66 of 1066 (6%) with a negative or unknown test result. In multivariable analyses, factors associated with testing included neuromuscular disease (aOR = 5.35, 95% CI [3.58-8.01]), immunocompromised status (aOR = 2.88, 95% CI [1.66-5.01]), age (aOR = 0.93, 95% CI [0.91-0.96]), private only versus public only insurance (aOR = 0.78, 95% CI [0.63-0.98]), and chronic lung disease (aOR = 0.64, 95% CI [0.51-0.81]). Factors associated with antiviral treatment included neuromuscular disease (aOR = 1.86, 95% CI [1.04, 3.31]), immunocompromised state (aOR = 2.63, 95% CI [1.38, 4.99]), duration of illness (aOR = 0.92, 95% CI [0.84, 0.99]), and chronic lung disease (aOR = 0.60, 95% CI [0.38, 0.95]).Approximately half of children hospitalized with influenza during the 2015-2016 influenza season were treated with antivirals. Because antiviral treatment for influenza is associated with better health outcomes, further studies of subsequent seasons would help evaluate current use of antivirals among children and better understand barriers for treatment.

Background As of 2017 (WHO, 2017), diarrheal disease ranked second as a cause of worldwide mortality for children under five years of age. Approximately 50-70% of acute gastroenteritis (AGE) is viral in etiology, with commonly detected viruses including norovirus, rotavirus, and adenovirus. However, the epidemiology of less commonly detected viruses, specifically enterovirus (EV) and parechovirus A (PeV-A), associated AGE in the United States is not well described. The purpose of our study was to determine the prevalence of EV and PeV-A in children with AGE vs. healthy controls (HC) over a 7-year period. Methods From December 2011 – November 2018, we screened stool samples from children less than 18 years of age prospectively enrolled in Children’s Mercy-Kansas City’s (CM-KC) site for the CDC’s New Vaccine Surveillance Network; 3005 samples from subjects presenting with AGE and 1097 from HC. Samples from 2011 – 2016 (AGE: 2453; HC:752) and 2017 – 2018 (AGE:552; HC:344) were tested at CDC and CM-KC respectively by a real-time-PCR assay using specific EV and PeV-A primers targeting the highly conserved 5’ untranslated region. Demographic data were collected from EMR. Results Among 3005 AGE samples, EV was detected in 12.5% (n=386/3004), and PeV-A in 10.3% (n=252/3005). Among 1097 HC samples, EV was detected in 9.0% (99/1096), and PeV-A in 11.9% (130/1097). In 2014-2015 EV detection in AGE was highest (17.9%) among all years and significantly higher (p=0.004) than in HC samples (9.1%), whereas PeV-A detection in AGE was 9.5% vs. 15.6% in HC samples, p=0.008 (Table 1). Co-infections with EV and PeV-A were seen in 55 AGE and 21 HC. Most EV detections (45.1%) were in 1- to 2-year-olds, whereas PeV-A detections (47.3%) were in children < 1 year old (Table 2). Both EV (58.3%) and PeV-A (48.4%) detections were significantly more frequent in male children (p=0.006). The highest frequency of EV detections was in summer to fall months, and for PeV-A in late summer through early winter. Conclusion We report a higher prevalence of EV infections in AGE, and PeV-A infections in HC during 2011 to 2018, plus their seasonal and age distributions. Although our data do not currently demonstrate an association between detection of EV or PeV-A types and AGE, additional data could provide more clarity into a potential association. Disclosures Brian R. Lee, PhD, MPH, CDC: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support Christopher J Harrison, MD, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pediatric news: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Mary E. Moffatt, M.D., Becton and Dickinson and Company: Stocks/Bonds|Biogen: Stocks/Bonds|Coloplast B: Stocks/Bonds|Express Scripts: Stocks/Bonds|Novo Nordisk A/S Spons ADR: Stocks/Bonds|Novo Nordisk A/S-B: Stocks/Bonds|Steris PLC: Stocks/Bonds|Stryker Corp: Stocks/Bonds|Thermo Fisher Scientific: Stocks/Bonds Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support.

Background Non-polio Enteroviruses (EV) are important neonatal CNS pathogens. Multiple EV genotypes have been detected in pediatric CSF, e.g. Echovirus (E) 6 and E30. CSF innate immune responses to EV genotypes remain poorly defined. Most data are from EV-A71 or E30 CNS infections and do not compare responses between these or other EV types. We sought to better define innate immune responses to EV genotypes in CSF. Methods Salvaged standard of care CSF samples from ≤6 month olds (real time EV PCR(+) or EV PCR(-) controls) from Jan 2010 - Dec 2020 were tested in duplicate on a 21- cytokine bead panel (MilliporeSigma). EV positive samples were previously genotyped by sequencing the viral capsid gene. Cytokine levels calculated from the standard curve were compared by Kruskal-Wallis and post-hoc analysis (GraphPad Prism 8.4.3). Natural partitioning of participants was explored using principal component analysis and cluster analysis (IBM SPSS v27). The utility of cytokine signatures in predicting EV status was explored using discriminant analysis and ROC analysis (IBM SPSS v27). Results Data from 72 CSF with E6 (N=16), E9 (N= 9), E18 (N=9), and E30 (N=21) showed significant differences among EV genotypes vs. controls for 20 cytokines (IL-17 was excluded). Significant differences in cytokine levels in EV CSF vs controls were seen: E6 for all 20 cytokines; E9 for Fractalkine, IP10, and MCP1; E18 for Fractalkine and MCP1; E30 19 cytokines (not GM-CSF). PCA revealed only minor overlap of controls and EV positives; EV types overlapped, except E30, differing most from E9 and E18 but overlapping E6. The most important type-differentiating cytokines by PCA were MCP1, Fractalkine, IL-8, and IL-10. Patterns in DA resembled PCA; controls clearly separated from EV CSF, E30 being the most distinct. Overall, the discriminant model correctly classified EV type or controls at a 63% rate - highest for controls (94.1%) and E30 (74.1%). In the DA model, the most important cytokines were IP-10, IL-2, IL-1Ra, and Fractalkine. Discriminant scores had the largest area under the curve (AUC), 0.990. Among cytokines, IFNa2 had the largest AUC, 0.987. Conclusion Preliminary data show significant EV-genotype differences in innate immune response to CNS infections. Cytokine patterns may serve as a key predictor for discerning EV genotypes. Disclosures Brian R. Lee, PhD, MPH, CDC: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support Christopher J Harrison, MD, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pediatric news: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support.

Background Mycoplasma pneumoniae (MP), a common pediatric pneumonia pathogen, has 2 subtypes based on P1 adhesin gene variation. Macrolide-resistant MP (MRMP), seen since 2000 in many countries, has been subtype associated. Limited U.S. pediatric data exist on MP subtype or MRMP frequency and their clinical importance. Methods During 2015–2020, mid-turbinate nasal swab (MTNS) specimens and/or throat swabs were collected from children with acute respiratory illness (ARI) enrolled in emergency department (ED) or outpatient and inpatient settings at 4 CDC-funded New Vaccine Surveillance Network sites (Cincinnati, Seattle, Houston, and Kansas City). Specimens were tested for MP and common respiratory viruses by singleplex or multiplex polymerase chain reaction assay (PCR). P1-subtyping for MP positive specimens used multiplex TaqMan real-time PCR while MR was assessed by real time PCR with melt curve analysis (Lightmix®, TIBMolbiol). Select demographic/clinical data were analyzed by P1 subtype (P1–1 vs. P1–2). Results Of 208 MTNS specimens from 208 children (median age 5.5 years), 110 (53%) were P1–1, 89 (43%) P1–2, and 9 (4%) untypeable. Of 199 typeable specimens, 111 (56%) came from inpatients while 88 (44%) came from ED/outpatients.Overall MRMP prevalence during 2015–2020 was low (3/208,1.4%); all MRMP (Houston: 1 each in 2016–2017 and 2019–2020, Seattle: 1 in 2018–2019) were P1–1. Differences in P1–2 vs. P1–1 proportions were significant in 2 years: P1–2 dominated in 2015–2016; P1-1 in 2019–2020 (Figure 1). Common clinical symptoms for 199 MP-positive patients were fever (84%, mean 102.5±1.5oF), shortness of breath (82%), wheezing (67%), and cough (60%). Clinical manifestations, hospitalization, and antibiotic use did not differ in P1-1 vs. P1-2 patients. Antibiotics were used in 59/199 (30%) patients overall; amoxicillin was most frequent (48/199, 24%), followed by cefdinir (9/199, 5%) and azithromycin (5/199, 3%). Conclusion MP subtypes co-circulated during 2015–2020; P1-2 dominated in 2015–2016, P1-1 in 2018–2019. Signs/symptoms were similar for P1-1 and P1-2. MRMP detection was uncommon among our pediatric subjects. Ongoing surveillance is important to assess potential changes in MR prevalence and temporal subtype variation. Disclosures Christopher J Harrison, MD, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pediatric news: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Brian R. Lee, PhD, MPH, CDC: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support Mary E. Moffatt, M.D., Becton and Dickinson and Company: Stocks/Bonds|Biogen: Stocks/Bonds|Coloplast B: Stocks/Bonds|Express Scripts: Stocks/Bonds|Novo Nordisk A/S Spons ADR: Stocks/Bonds|Novo Nordisk A/S-B: Stocks/Bonds|Steris PLC: Stocks/Bonds|Stryker Corp: Stocks/Bonds|Thermo Fisher Scientific: Stocks/Bonds Janet A. Englund, MD, Astra Zeneca: Advisor/Consultant|Astra Zeneca: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Meissa Vaccine: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|SanofiPasteur: Advisor/Consultant.

Background Access to multiplex molecular diagnostic tests for the rapid and accurate diagnosis of pharyngitis and other respiratory infections is limited in the near patient setting, but has potential to improve patient outcomes and antibiotic stewardship. The BioFire® Respiratory/Sore Throat (R/ST) Panel (bioMérieux, Salt Lake City, UT), designed for use with the BioFire® SpotFire System, is an Investigational Use Only (IUO) PCR-based sample-to-answer diagnostic test that identifies four bacteria and 10 viruses from nasopharyngeal swabs or throat swabs in ∼16 minutes. This study evaluated the ease of use and operator performance of the IUO R/ST Panel in the near patient setting. Methods A total of 35 test operators representative of the intended users in the near patient setting (i.e. non-laboratory professionals) participated across five study sites in the US and UK. Only Instrument and Panel Quick Guide training materials were provided during the eight months of R/ST Panel testing. Upon study completion, anonymous questionnaires were administered to assess operators’ perceived ease of use of the BioFire SpotFire System, R/ST Panel testing, and training materials; the accuracy of results interpretations were also evaluated. Further, results obtained by operators in the near patient setting and trained laboratory personnel were evaluated for reproducibility. Results Overall, 96.9% of operators reported that the system and panel were easy to use and that the provided training materials were sufficient to allow the user to perform the testing. The success rate of obtaining valid results on the initial test was 96.9%, similar to the rates observed for trained laboratory personnel. Reproducibility between site operators and trained laboratory personnel demonstrated an overall positive percent agreement of 99.0%. Conclusion The BioFire SpotFire System is an easy to use system that can be installed and operated in a near patient setting with minimal training. The R/ST Panel is also easy to use with minimal risk for user error. Implementation of this new system may aid in timely diagnosis and appropriate management of pharyngitis and other respiratory infections. Data presented are from assays that have not been cleared or approved for diagnostic use. Disclosures Ashley Ky, MLS(ASCP), bioMérieux: Employee|bioMérieux: Stocks/Bonds Jeffrey Bastar, PhD, bioMerieux: Employee|bioMerieux: Stocks/Bonds Kristen Holmberg, n/a, bioMerieux: Employee Hana Bay, BS, Biomerieux: Employee|Biomerieux: Stocks/Bonds Tiffani Jones, PhD, bioMerieux: Employee|bioMerieux: Stocks/Bonds Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support Virve Enne, BSc PhD, Biomerieux: Advisor/Consultant Cynthia Andjelic, PhD, bioMerieux: Employee.

Background Tracheal aspirates (TA) are frequently obtained in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU); however, no data exists on the frequency or clinical management of multiple TA cultures on the same PICU patient. In this study, we describe the frequency of repeat TAs in PICU patients, the emergence of multidrug resistant organisms (MDRO), frequently cultured pathogens of TAs, and associated antibiotic prescribing patterns. Methods We identified 70 PICU patients between 2018-2019 who met our criteria for retrospective chart review with ≥ 2 TAs obtained during their hospitalization. The following information was collected: patient demographics, number of TAs per patient, microbiology with susceptibilities, antibiotic use, and clinical data summarizing patient condition. Descriptive statistics established the frequency and time between initial and repeat TAs, reason for collection, antibiotic exposure, and frequency of MDRO development. Results Preliminary data on 15 patients showed 90 total TA cultures, with a median of 4 [IQR 2.5, 8] cultures per patient during their PICU stay (Figure 1). The median days between cultures was 10 [IQR 4, 26]. Most patients were < 5 years of age (n=14; 94%), male (n=13; 87%), and were admitted to the medical ICU service (n=8, 53%). Fever (46%) was the most common reason for TA collection followed by vital sign changes and secretion burden (34% and 32% respectively). A total of 133 organisms were isolated, with Pseudomonas aeruginosa (n=32), Methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (n=16), and Klebsiella oxytoca (n=11) comprising the top pathogens (Figure 2). Eleven of the 15 patients (73.3%) had the same organism detected on ≥ 2 separate cultures. A total of 616 antibiotic days were prescribed with 149 (24%) antibiotic days prescribed for the TA result specifically. Six (40%) patients developed a MDRO after a median of 14.5 antibiotic days [IQR 11.75, 37.5]. Figure 1Number of tracheal aspirate cultures per patient Figure 2 Frequency of identified pathogens Conclusion Repeat TAs are performed in the PICU, often identifying the same pathogen repeatedly, likely representing colonization. Development of resistance is common and only one-fourth of TAs are directly treated with antibiotics. These data provide an opportunity to further explore clinical criteria to maximize the impact of TA cultures in the PICU. Disclosures Brian R. Lee, PhD, MPH, CDC: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support.

Background An optimal specimen collection method is important for pathogen detection in respiratory surveillance studies. Mid-turbinate swab (MTS) in combination with throat swab (TS) were used for collecting samples from children enrolled in Kansas City site of the New Vaccine Surveillance Network (NVSN), a prospective surveillance network for acute respiratory infections. A standalone MTS is used for standard of care (SOC) testing. We compared detections from NVSN MTS+TS vs. SOC MTS samples collected ±1 day of each other to evaluate the sensitivity of the single MTS collection in children. Methods Nucleic acid extracts from NVSN MTS+TS samples were tested by Luminex NxTag Respiratory Pathogen Panel (NxTag RPP). SOC MTS samples were tested by BioFire® Respiratory Panel 1.7. (FilmArray). All children, aged < 18 years enrolled in the inpatient and Emergency Department for NVSN (November 2015 to May 2019) with available historical MTS SOC testing results ±1 day of enrollment were included in the study. Concordance between results of NVSN MTS+TS and SOC MTS testing was measured. Results Paired NVSN and SOC samples were available from 315 subjects with median age of 16.8 months (IQR 5.0 months – 61.7 months); 59.3% (189/315) were from male subjects. An overall positivity of 93.6% was noted with 295 detections by one sample or the other. Of the 295 detections, 231 (78%) detections were in both samples; 35 (12%) detections by MTS+TS; and 29 (10%) detections by MTS only. High concordance ( >90%) and very good Kappa values (Table 1) between the 2 specimen collection methods was noted for most pathogens. 72% of discrepant samples were from children with median age 13.2 months (IQR 8.0 months – 38.6 months). Conclusion We observed high concordance between MTS and MTS+TS for all targets. Most discrepant samples were from young children in whom adequate sampling can be challenging, perhaps reducing sensitivity. Differences in time of collection and testing, and platform differences (NxTag RPP vs. FilmArray) may have impacted our data, e.g. due to variable assay sensitivities for specific targets. Regardless of these differences, our data show comparable performance between MTS alone and MTS+TS suggesting that MTS alone may be sufficient for respiratory pathogen surveillance in children. Disclosures Brian R. Lee, PhD, MPH, CDC: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support Christopher J Harrison, MD, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pediatric news: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support.

Background Adenovirus (AdV) is a common cause of acute respiratory illness (ARI). Multiple respiratory AdV types have been identified in humans, but it remains unclear which are the most common in U.S. children with ARI. Methods We conducted a multicenter, prospective viral surveillance study at seven U.S. children’s hospitals, the New Vaccine Surveillance Network, during 12/1/16–11/30/19, prior to the COVID-19 pandemic. Children < 18 years of age seen in the emergency department or hospitalized with fever and/or respiratory symptoms were enrolled, and mid-turbinate nasal +/- throat swabs were tested using multiplex respiratory pathogen assays or real time polymerase chain reaction (PCR) test for AdV, respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), human metapneumovirus, rhinovirus/enterovirus (RV), influenza, parainfluenza viruses, and endemic coronaviruses. AdV-positive specimens were subsequently typed using single-plex qPCR assays targeting sequences in the hexon gene specific for types 1-7, 11, 14, 16 and 21. Demographics, clinical characteristics, and outcomes were compared between AdV types. Results Of 29,381 enrolled children, 2,106 (7.2%) tested positive for AdV. The distribution of types among the 1,330 (63.2%) successfully typed specimens were as follows: 31.7% AdV-2, 28.9% AdV-1, 15.3% AdV-3, 7.9% AdV-5, 5.9% AdV-7, 1.4% AdV-4, 1.2% AdV-6, 0.5% AdV-14, 0.2% AdV-21, 0.1% AdV-11, and 7.0% ≥1 AdV type. Most children with AdV-1 or AdV-2 detection were < 5 years of age (Figure 1a). Demographic and clinical characteristics varied by AdV types, including age, race/ethnicity, smoke exposure, daycare/school attendance, and hospitalization (Table 1). Co-detection with other viruses was common among all AdV types, with RV and RSV being the most frequently co-detected (Figure 1b). Fever and cough were the most common symptoms for all AdV types (Figure 2). Children with AdV-7 detected as single pathogen had higher odds of hospitalization (adjusted odds ratio 6.34 [95% CI: 3.10, 12.95], p= 0.027). Conclusion AdV-2 and AdV-1 were the most frequently detected AdV types among children over the 3-year study period. Notable clinical heterogeneity of the AdV types warrants further surveillance studies to identify AdV types that could be targeted for pediatric vaccine development. Disclosures Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support John Williams, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Advisor/Consultant|Quidel: Advisor/Consultant Mary A. Staat, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Grant/Research Support|Cepheid: Grant/Research Support|National Institute of Health: Grant/Research Support|Uptodate: Royalties Christopher J Harrison, MD, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pediatric news: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Mary E. Moffatt, M.D., Becton and Dickinson and Company: Stocks/Bonds|Biogen: Stocks/Bonds|Coloplast B: Stocks/Bonds|Express Scripts: Stocks/Bonds|Novo Nordisk A/S Spons ADR: Stocks/Bonds|Novo Nordisk A/S-B: Stocks/Bonds|Steris PLC: Stocks/Bonds|Stryker Corp: Stocks/Bonds|Thermo Fisher Scientific: Stocks/Bonds Geoffrey A. Weinberg, MD, Merck & Co.: Honoraria|Merck & Co.: Honoraria for composing and reviewing textbook chapters, Merck Manual of Therapeutics Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Meissa Vaccines: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Advisor/Consultant Natasha B. Halasa, MD, Quidel: Grant/Research Support|Quidel: equipment donation|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: HAI testing and vaccine donation.

Background Children ≤5 years of age have the highest rates of pneumococcal colonization and play an important role in the spread of pneumococcus. Our objective was to determine whether the public health measures (physical distancing, masking, and shelter-in-place orders) implemented to slow the spread of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic had an impact on pneumococcal colonization rates among children aged ≤5 years with and without respiratory symptoms during the first year of SARS-CoV-2 pandemic (4/1/20 to 3/31/21). Methods This is a single center retrospective cohort study. The study period was divided in 3 four-month periods to represent the initial period of strict adherence to public health measures (period 1: Apr-Jul), relaxation of some of these measures (period 2: Aug-Nov) and Northern hemisphere winter season (period 3: Dec-Mar). We used salvaged mid-turbinate samples obtained as part of routine care from patients without respiratory symptoms but screened for SARS-CoV-2 prior to surgery or aerosol generating procedures (asymptomatic) or from patients with respiratory symptoms tested for SARS-CoV-2 and/or other respiratory viruses (symptomatic). Samples were evaluated for pneumococcal colonization by real-time PCR using CDC lytA primers. Sample size was calculated based on the assumption of lower colonization rates in period 1 and gradual increase (10-15%) in the following study periods. Results A total of 311 patients were included (185 asymptomatic and 126 symptomatic). Demographics, SARS-CoV-2 PCR and pneumococcal colonization results are shown in Table 1. Pneumococcal colonization rates for asymptomatic and symptomatic children were 14% and 22% (p=0.06), respectively. The odds of colonization of asymptomatic children were similar during period 2 (OR 0.96 [95%CI 0.34-2.67]) and period 3 (OR 0.53 [95%CI 0.17-1.62]), using period 1 as reference and after adjusting for age, sex, and SARS-COV-2 results. The odds of colonization of symptomatic children were also similar across the 3 study periods (period 2 OR 1.28 [95%CI 0.41-4.01] and period 3 OR 0.73 [95% CI 0.24-2.18]). Table 1.Characteristics of asymptomatic and symptomatic groups Conclusion Pneumococcal colonization rates were not significantly impacted by public health measures implemented during the first year of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic and did not correlate with SARS-CoV-2 positivity. Disclosures Liset Olarte, MD, MSc, GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support Douglas S. Swanson, MD, Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support Brian R. Lee, PhD, MPH, CDC: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support Christopher J. Harrison, MD, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pediatric News: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support.

Background The BioFire® FilmArray® Gastrointestinal (GI) Panel provides results for 22 bacterial, viral, and protozoan pathogens responsible for GI infection in about an hour. This test is indicated for use with stool specimens in Cary-Blair media (SCB) as a specimen type. For many patients, a stool sample can be difficult to provide during a single clinic visit, potentially delaying diagnosis and treatment. Rectal swabs in Cary-Blair (RSCB; an off-label sample type) are a more convenient and faster specimen type to collect, as collection can occur during a patient’s healthcare visit. The purpose of this study was to assess the performance of the GI Panel when testing RSCB compared to SCB. Methods Paired SCB and RSCB specimens were collected from outpatient subjects with signs of GI infection and tested in parallel using the GI Panel. All detections were confirmed using culture (for some bacterial analytes) and PCR/sequencing. Performance of the GI Panel in RSCB versus SCB specimen types was assessed using the ratios (RSCB/SCB) of sensitivities and false positive rates (FPR). Positive percent agreement (PPA) and negative percent agreement (NPA) for the GI Panel test in RSCB compared to SCB were also evaluated. Results A total of 299 paired SCB and RSCB specimens were collected and tested with the GI Panel. Detections for 17 of the 22 analytes on the GI Panel were observed in both specimen types. When comparing results from RSCB and SCB specimen types, the overall ratio of sensitivity was 0.86 and the overall ratio of FPR was 0.31. Further, overall PPA was 76.6% and overall NPA was 99.8%. Conclusion Overall, the GI Panel is sensitive and specific for the rapid detection of many of the organisms responsible for GI infection when using either specimen type, however RSCB specimens have a lower diagnostic yield (i.e. fewer detections) compared to SCB. As a result, GI Panel performance for the RSCB is characterized as less sensitive compared to performance for SCB specimens. Acknowledging these limitations, the convenience and time-to-result benefits of the RSCB specimen type may aid in the effective diagnosis and management of GI infection in outpatient settings. The BioFire FilmArray GI Panel is not cleared or approved for use with rectal swabs in Cary-Blair. Disclosures Jared Goos, PhD, bioMerieux: Employee|bioMerieux: Stocks/Bonds Crissy Neff, n/a, bioMerieux: Employee|bioMerieux: Stocks/Bonds Kristen Holmberg, n/a, bioMerieux: Employee Annie Lyons, n/a, bioMerieux: Employee Nicole Monroe, Dr. sc. nat., bioMerieux: Employee Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support Kimberle Chapin, MD, Cepheid: Employee Bradley A. Connor, MD, BioMerieux: Advisor/Consultant Cynthia Andjelic, PhD, bioMerieux: Employee.

Background According to the 2018 Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) clinical practice guidelines and Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidance, clinicians should start antiviral treatment as soon as possible for children who are hospitalized with suspected or confirmed influenza. We assessed the use of influenza-specific antiviral therapy in children hospitalized with symptoms of acute respiratory illness and laboratory-confirmed influenza. Methods We conducted active, population-based surveillance of children hospitalized with fever and/or respiratory symptoms (12/01/2016–02/28/2020) at the seven U.S. medical centers that comprise the CDC New Vaccine Surveillance Network. We excluded children who did not undergo clinical testing (by rapid antigen testing or nucleic acid amplification test [NAAT]) or research testing (by NAAT) for influenza, those who presented out of influenza season (site- and season-specific), and those whose date of antiviral therapy or whether antiviral therapy was given was unknown. We assessed the use of influenza-specific antiviral therapy in this cohort and defined timely antiviral therapy as administration within 2 days of hospitalization. Results Of 11,275 eligible children, 1,149 (10.2%) tested positive for influenza by clinical and/or research assays (Table 1). Overall, 154 influenza cases (13.4%) were detected by clinical testing only, 428 (37.2%) by research testing only, and 567 (49.3%) by both. During their influenza-associated hospitalization, 620 children (54.0%) received influenza-specific antivirals, and therapy was timely in 572 cases (92.3%). Of those who tested positive clinically, 445/721 (61.7%) received timely antiviral therapy, 38 (5.3%) received delayed antiviral therapy, and 238 (33.0%) received no antiviral therapy. Oseltamivir was the antiviral used in all treated cases. The distribution of antiviral-treated cases varied by race and Hispanic origin and study site, but not by age at presentation or influenza season (Figure 1). Table 1 Demographic characteristics of 1,149 children with influenza enrolled in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network over four influenza seasons between December 1, 2016, and February 28, 2020. Figure 1Proportions of children with influenza enrolled in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network who received timely, delayed, or no antiviral therapy by age at presentation, race and Hispanic origin, study site, and influenza season (N=1,149). Conclusion Although antiviral therapy is recommended for all influenza-associated hospitalizations in children, antiviral prescribing remains suboptimal. Further studies would help identify and address barriers to antiviral therapy in children with influenza. Disclosures John Williams, MD, GlaxoSmithKline: Advisor/Consultant|Quidel: Advisor/Consultant Janet A. Englund, MD, AstraZeneca: Advisor/Consultant|AstraZeneca: Grant/Research Support|GlaxoSmithKline: Grant/Research Support|Meissa Vaccines: Advisor/Consultant|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi Pasteur: Advisor/Consultant Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support Mary A. Staat, MD, MPH, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: Grant/Research Support|Cepheid: Grant/Research Support|National Institute of Health: Grant/Research Support|Uptodate: Royalties Geoffrey A. Weinberg, MD, Merck & Co.: Honoraria|Merck & Co.: Honoraria for composing and reviewing textbook chapters, Merck Manual of Therapeutics Flor M. Munoz, MD, MSc, Gilead: Grant/Research Support|Moderna: DSMB|Pfizer: DSMB Christopher J Harrison, MD, Astellas: Grant/Research Support|GSK: Grant/Research Support|Merck: Grant/Research Support|Pediatric news: Honoraria|Pfizer: Grant/Research Support Natasha B. Halasa, MD, Quidel: Grant/Research Support|Quidel: equipment donation|Sanofi: Grant/Research Support|Sanofi: HAI testing and vaccine donation.

Background Limited availability of multiplex molecular tests in the near-patient setting can impact the rapid diagnosis and treatment of patients experiencing symptoms of respiratory tract infections, including pharyngitis. The BioFire® Respiratory/Sore Throat (R/ST) Panel (bioMérieux, Salt Lake City, UT), designed for use with the BioFire® SpotFire System, is a PCR-based sample-to-answer diagnostic test that identifies four bacteria and 10 viruses (including SARS-CoV-2) from nasopharyngeal swab (NPS) or throat swab (TS) specimens in about 16 minutes. This study evaluated the performance of an Investigational Use Only (IUO) version of the BioFire R/ST Panel in the near patient setting. Methods NPS and TS specimens were prospectively enrolled from symptomatic consented/assented volunteers of all ages, or obtained as residual leftover specimens. Enrollment was conducted between December 2020 and September 2021 at five study sites in the US and UK (adult and pediatric emergency departments or urgent care clinics) with testing performed by personnel representative of the intended users (non-laboratory professionals). Several analytes that were not circulating during the COVID-19 pandemic were supplemented with archived specimens of known analyte composition. Performance was determined for both sample types by comparison to FDA cleared multiplex PCR tests or culture and PCR followed by sequencing of isolates (Streptococcus from throat swabs). Results A total of 1131 NPS and 452 TS prospectively collected specimens and 542 NPS and 128 TS archived specimens were tested with the BioFire R/ST Panel. For NPS specimens (prospective and archived) overall positive percent agreement (PPA) was 98.7% and negative percent agreement (NPA) was 99.1%, and for TS specimens (prospective and archived) overall PPA was 95.9% and NPA was 99.2%. Conclusion The BioFire R/ST Panel is a sensitive, specific, and robust test for rapid detection of a wide range of organisms in NPS and TS specimens in the near-patient setting. This test is expected to aid in the timely diagnosis and appropriate management of pharyngitis and other respiratory infections. Data presented are from assays that have not been cleared or approved for diagnostic use. Disclosures Jeffrey Bastar, PhD, MSCI, bioMerieux: Employee|bioMerieux: Stocks/Bonds Ashley Ky, MLS(ASCP), bioMérieux: Employee|bioMérieux: Stocks/Bonds Kristen Holmberg, n/a, bioMerieux: Employee Hana Bay, BS, Biomerieux: Employee|Biomerieux: Stocks/Bonds Daria Drobysheva, PhD, bioMerieux: Employee Rangaraj Selvarangan, BVSc, PhD, D(ABMM), FIDSA, F(AAM), BioFire: Grant/Research Support|Luminex: Grant/Research Support Virve Enne, BSc PhD, Biomerieux: Advisor/Consultant Cynthia Andjelic, PhD, bioMerieux: Employee.

Previous studies focusing on the age disparity in COVID-19 severity have suggested that younger individuals mount a more robust innate immune response in the nasal mucosa after infection with SARS-CoV-2. However, it is unclear if this reflects increased immune activation or increased immune residence in the nasal mucosa. We hypothesized that immune residency in the nasal mucosa of healthy individuals may differ across the age range. We applied single-cell RNA-sequencing and measured the cellular composition and transcriptional profile of the nasal mucosa in 35 SARS-CoV-2 negative children and adults, ranging in age from 4 months to 65 years. We analyzed in total of ~ 30,000 immune and epithelial cells and found that age and immune cell proportion in the nasal mucosa are inversely correlated, with little evidence for structural changes in the transcriptional state of a given cell type across the age range. Orthogonal validation by epigenome sequencing indicate that it is especially cells of the innate immune system that underlie the age-association. Additionally, we characterize the predominate immune cell type in the nasal mucosa: a resident T cell like population with potent antiviral properties. These results demonstrate fundamental changes in the immune cell makeup of the uninfected nasal mucosa over the lifespan. The resource we generate here is an asset for future studies focusing on respiratory infection and immunization strategies.

Background The global pandemic of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is caused by infection with the SARS-CoV-2 virus. Currently, there are three approved vaccines against SARS-CoV-2 in the USA, including two based on messenger RNA (mRNA) technology that has demonstrated high vaccine efficacy. We sought to characterize humoral immune responses, at high resolution, during immunization with the BNT162b2 (Pfizer-BioNTech) vaccine in individuals with or without prior history of natural SARS-CoV-2 infection. Methods We determined antibody responses after each dose of the BNT162b2 SARS-CoV-2 vaccine in individuals who had no prior history of SARS-CoV-2 infection (seronegative) and individuals that had previous viral infection 30–60 days prior to first vaccination (seropositive). To do this, we used both an antibody isotype-specific multiplexed bead-based binding assays targeting multiple SARS-CoV-2 viral protein antigens and an assay that identified potential SARS-CoV-2 neutralizing antibody levels. Moreover, we mapped antibody epitope specificity after immunization using SARS-CoV-2 spike protein peptide arrays. Results Antibody levels were significantly higher after a single dose in seropositive individuals compared to seronegative individuals and were comparable to levels observed in seronegative individuals after two doses. While IgG was boosted by vaccination for both seronegative and seropositive individuals, only seronegative individuals had increased IgA or IgM antibody titers after primary immunization. We identified immunodominant peptides targeted on both SARS-CoV-2 spike S1 and S2 subunits after vaccination. Conclusion These findings demonstrated the antibody responses to SARS-CoV-2 immunization in seropositive and seronegative individuals and provide support for the concept of using prior infection history as a guide for the consideration of future vaccination regimens. Moreover, we identified key epitopes on the SARS-CoV-2 spike protein that are targeted by antibodies after vaccination that could guide future vaccine and immune correlate development.

Background Following the implementation of rotavirus vaccination in 2006, severe acute gastroenteritis (AGE) due to group A rotavirus (RVA) has substantially declined in US children. We report the RVA genotype prevalence as well as coinfection data from 7 US New Vaccine Surveillance Network sites during 3 consecutive RVA seasons, 2014–2016 Methods A total of 1041 stool samples that tested positive for RVA by Rotaclone enzyme immunoassay were submitted to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for RVA genotyping and multipathogen testing. Results A total of 795 (76%) samples contained detectable RVA when tested at the CDC. Rotavirus disease was highest in children < 3 years of age. Four G types (G1, G2, G9, and G12) accounted for 94.6% of strains while 2 P types (P[4] and P[8]) accounted for 94.7% of the strains. Overall, G12P[8] was the most common genotype detected in all 3 seasons. Stepwise conditional logistic analysis found year and study site were significant predictors of genotype. Twenty-four percent of RVA-positive specimens contained other AGE pathogens. Conclusions G12P[8] predominated over 3 seasons, but strain predominance varied by year and study site. Ongoing surveillance provides continuous tracking and monitoring of US genotypes during the postvaccine era.

Ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T), a cephalosporin/beta-lactamase inhibitor combination, was evaluated in vitro vs. 10 comparators against 299 pediatric extended-spectrum-cephalosporin-resistant or carbapenem-resistant (ESC-R/CR) Gram-negative Enterobacteriaceae from three freestanding pediatric centers. Isolates were from urine or other sterile sites of children and adolescents through 21 years of age. Susceptibilities were assayed by microbroth dilution via custom Sensititre plates (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Susceptibility was determined using the Sensititre Vizion® system (Thermo Fisher Scientific). Susceptibility breakpoint criteria were those of the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute (CLSI) for 2017, except for colistin (EUCAST 2019). Overall, 87.5% isolates were C/T susceptible (MIC ≤2 μg/ml; MIC50/90, 0.25/4 μg/ml). Susceptibility to C/T was detected more frequently as compared to all other antimicrobials tested except for colistin (95.4%) and meropenem (97.4%). Percent susceptibility to C/T was high for E. coli (91%) and Klebsiella spp. (73.3%). C/T demonstrated good in-vitro activity and high potency against most beta-lactam resistant pediatric Enterobacteriaceae from three geographically diverse U.S. regions.

BackgroundSevere acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) screening testing is a recommended mitigation strategy for schools, although few descriptions of program implementation are available.MethodsKindergarten through 12th grade (K–12) students and staff practicing universal masking during the delta and omicron variant waves from five schools in Durham, North Carolina and eight schools in Kansas City, Missouri participated; Durham’s program was structured as a public health initiative facilitated by school staff, and Kansas City’s as a research study facilitated by a research team. Tests included school-based rapid antigen or polymerase chain reaction testing, at-home rapid antigen testing, and off-site nucleic acid amplification testing.ResultsWe performed nearly 5700 screening tests on more than 1600 K–12 school students and staff members. The total cost for the Durham testing program in 5 public charter K–12 schools, each with 500–1000 students, was $246 587 and approximately 752 h per semester; cost per test was $70 and cost per positive result was $7076. The total cost for the Kansas City program in eight public K–12 schools was $292 591 and required approximately 537 h in personnel time for school-based testing; cost per test was $132 and cost per positive result was $4818. SARS-CoV-2 positivity rates were generally lower (0–16.16%) than rates in the community (2.7–36.47%) throughout all testing weeks.Conclusions and RelevanceVoluntary screening testing programs in K–12 schools are costly and rarely detect asymptomatic positive persons, particularly in universally masked settings.Clinical Trial RegistrationNCT04831866.

A suboptimal response to the 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine series in the immunocompromised population prompted recommendations for a 3rd primary dose. We aimed to determine the humoral and cellular immune response to the 3rd COVID-19 vaccine in immunocompromised children.Prospective cohort study of immunocompromised participants, 5-21 years old, who received 2 prior doses of an mRNA COVID-19 vaccine. Humoral and CD4/CD8 T-cell responses were measured to SARS-CoV-2 spike antigens prior to receiving the 3rd vaccine dose and 3-4 weeks after the 3rd dose was given.Of the 37 participants, approximately half were solid organ transplant recipients. The majority (86.5%) had a detectable humoral response after the 2nd and 3rd vaccine doses, with a significant increase in antibody levels after the 3rd dose. Positive T-cell responses increased from being present in 86.5% to 100% of the cohort after the 3rd dose.Most immunocompromised children mount a humoral and cellular immune response to the 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine series, which is significantly augmented after receiving the 3rd vaccine dose. This supports the utility of the 3rd vaccine dose and the rationale for ongoing emphasis for vaccination against COVID-19 in this population.Most immunocompromised children mount a humoral and cellular immune response to the 2-dose COVID-19 vaccine series, which is significantly augmented after receiving the 3rd vaccine dose. This is the first prospective cohort study to analyze both the humoral and T-cell immune response to the 3rd COVID-19 primary vaccine dose in children who are immunocompromised. The results of this study support the utility of the 3rd vaccine dose and the rationale for ongoing emphasis for vaccination against COVID-19 in the immunosuppressed pediatric population.

The fusion (F) protein of respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) is the major target of immunoprophylactic monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and vaccines. Recently reported mutations in F gene antigenic sites can vary among RSV types A and B. To further understand mutations in RSV F proteins, we performed subtyping and F gene sequencing on 400 RSV-positive respiratory samples collected at four pediatric hospitals within the United States from children under 2 years old between 2018 and 2020. RSV B was predominant in 2018-2019 and RSV A in 2019-2020 (55.5% and 85.5% respectively). Compared to the reference sequence, all RSV B samples had at least one antigenic polymorphism with the most changes at sites AM14/V (100%) and Ø (93.3%) followed by II (5.8%), IV (3.9%), and p27 (2.9%). The most frequent mutations among RSV B for AM14/V site were in L172Q (100%), S173L (100%), and K191R (95.2%) while for Ø site they were in I206M (93.3%) and Q209R (93.3%). Conversely, polymorphisms were observed in only 15.3% of RSV A samples overall, specifically at antigenic sites p27 (5.9%), IV (3.0%), II (2.5%), AM14/V (2.0%), I (2.0%), and Ø (0.5%). Among RSV A cases, T122A at p27 (n = 10) and S276N at II (n = 3) were the most common substitution sites. S276N at site II was found in both RSV types. Although polymorphisms in F proteins of RSV B were more common than those in RSV A samples, changes in both subtypes were observed in key F antigenic sites which could potentially impact the efficacy of mAb therapies and vaccines.

An estimated 12.8 million pediatric SARS-CoV-2 infections have occurred within the United States as of March 1 2022, with multiple epidemic waves due to emergence of several SARS-CoV-2 variants. The aim of this study was to compare demographics, clinical presentation, and detected respiratory co-infections during COVID-19 waves to better understand changes in pediatric SARS-CoV-2 epidemiology over time.

Determining the duration of immunity to severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) vaccines is critical for informing the timing of booster immunization. Many genetic and environmental factors could influence both the magnitude and persistence of the antibody response. Here, we showed that SARS-CoV-2 infection before vaccination and age affected the decay of antibody responses to the SARS-CoV-2 messenger RNA vaccine.

OBJECTIVES: Diagnosing Clostridioides difficile infections in young children with high asymptomatic colonization is challenging. We compared the frequency of C difficile detection by polymerase chain reaction (PCR) in healthy control (HC) children with those with acute gastroenteritis (AGE) and evaluated fecal-lactoferrin and organism load as possible indicators of true C difficile infection disease. METHODS: Stool was collected from children RESULTS: Of 524 stools collected from 524 children (250 with AGE, 274 HCs), C difficile was detected less in children with AGE (14%, 36 of 250) than in HCs (28%, 76 of 274) stools (P < .0001). Among infants CONCLUSIONS: HC children

Background Annual United States (US) estimates of influenza vaccine effectiveness (VE) in children typically measure protection against outpatient medically attended influenza illness, with limited data evaluating VE against influenza hospitalizations. We estimated VE for preventing laboratory-confirmed influenza hospitalization among US children. Methods We included children aged 6 months–17 years with acute respiratory illness enrolled in the New Vaccine Surveillance Network during the 2015–2016 influenza season. Documented influenza vaccination status was obtained from state immunization information systems, the electronic medical record, and/or provider records. Midturbinate nasal and throat swabs were tested for influenza using molecular assays. We estimated VE as 100% × (1 – odds ratio), comparing the odds of vaccination among subjects testing influenza positive with subjects testing negative, using multivariable logistic regression. Results Of 1653 participants, 36 of 707 (5%) of those fully vaccinated, 18 of 226 (8%) of those partially vaccinated, and 85 of 720 (12%) of unvaccinated children tested positive for influenza. Of those vaccinated, almost 90% were documented to have received inactivated vaccine. The majority (81%) of influenza cases were in children ≤ 8 years of age. Of the 139 influenza-positive cases, 42% were A(H1N1)pdm09, 42% were B viruses, and 14% were A(H3N2). Overall, adjusted VE for fully vaccinated children was 56% (95% confidence interval [CI], 34%–71%) against any influenza-associated hospitalization, 68% (95% CI, 36%–84%) for A(H1N1)pdm09, and 44% (95% CI, –1% to 69%) for B viruses. Conclusions These findings demonstrate the importance of annual influenza vaccination in prevention of severe influenza disease and of reducing the number of children who remain unvaccinated or partially vaccinated against influenza.

Antiviral resistance frequently complicates the treatment of herpes simplex virus (HSV) infections in immunocompromised patients. Here we present the case of an adolescent boy with dedicator of cytokinesis 8 (DOCK8) deficiency, who experienced recurrent infections with resistant HSV-1. We used both phenotypic and genotypic methodologies to characterize the resistance profile of HSV-1 in the patient and conclude that genotypic testing outperformed phenotypic testing. We also present the first analysis of intrahost HSV-1 evolution in an immunocompromised patient. While HSV-1 can remain static in an immunocompetent individual for decades, the virus from this patient rapidly acquired genetic changes throughout its genome. Finally, we document a likely case of transmitted resistance in HSV-1 between the patient and his brother, who also has DOCK8 deficiency. This event demonstrates that resistant HSV-1 is transmissible among immunocompromised persons.

OBJECTIVES To evaluate the hypothesis that viral meningitis may mimic abusive head trauma (AHT) by comparing the history of present illness (HPI) and clinical presentation of young children with proven viral meningitis to those with AHT and those with subdural hemorrhage (SDH) only. We hypothesized that significant differences would exist between viral meningitis and the comparison groups. METHODS We performed a 5-year retrospective case-control study of subjects aged RESULTS Of 550 subjects, there were 397 viral meningitis, 118 AHT, and 35 SDH-only subjects. Viral meningitis differed significantly from AHT subjects on all demographic measures, and from SDH-only subjects on age. Viral meningitis differed significantly from AHT subjects in all HPI measures with odds ratios ranging from 2.7 to 322.5, and from SDH-only subjects in 9 HPI measures with odds ratios ranging from 4.6 to 485.2. In the clinical domain, viral meningitis differed significantly from AHT subjects in all measures, with odds ratios ranging from 2.5 to 74.0, and from SDH-only subjects in 5 measures with odds ratios ranging from 2.9 to 16.8. CONCLUSIONS Viral meningitis is not supported as a mimic of AHT.

Background Human adenovirus (HAdV) is commonly associated with acute respiratory illnesses (ARI) in children and is also frequently co-detected with other viral pathogens. We compared clinical presentation and outcomes in young children with HAdV detected alone vs co-detected with other respiratory viruses. Methods We used data from a multicenter, prospective, viral surveillance study of children seen in the emergency department and inpatient pediatric settings at seven US sites. Children less than 18 years old with fever and/or respiratory symptoms were enrolled between 12/1/16 and 10/31/18 and tested by molecular methods for HAdV, human rhinovirus/enterovirus (HRV/EV), respiratory syncytial virus (RSV), parainfluenza (PIV, types 1–4), influenza (flu, types A-C), and human metapneumovirus (HMPV). Our primary measure of illness severity was hospitalization; among hospitalized children, secondary severity outcomes included oxygen support and length of stay (LOS). Results Of the 18,603 children enrolled, HAdV was detected in 1,136 (6.1%), among whom 646 (56.9%) had co-detection with at least one other respiratory virus. HRV/EV (n = 293, 45.3%) and RSV (n = 123, 19.0%) were the most frequent co-detections. Children with HRV/EV (aOR = 1.61; 95% CI = [1.11–2.34]), RSV (aOR = 4.48; 95% CI = [2.81–7.14]), HMPV (aOR = 3.39; 95% CI = [1.69–6.77]), or ≥ 2 co-detections (aOR = 1.95; 95% CI = [1.14–3.36]) had higher odds of hospitalization compared to children with HAdV alone. Among hospitalized children, HAdV co-detection with RSV or HMPV was each associated with higher odds of oxygen support, while co-detection with PIV or influenza viruses was each associated with higher mean LOS. Conclusions HAdV co-detection with other respiratory viruses was associated with greater disease severity among children with ARI compared to HAdV detection alone.

Studies have shown egg-adaptive mutations in influenza vaccine strains that might have impaired protection against circulating A(H3N2) influenza viruses during the 2016–2017 and 2017–2018 seasons. We used the test-negative design and multivariable models to assess vaccine effectiveness against influenza-associated hospitalization and emergency department visits among children (