Search

Previous studies suggested that obesity pro-inflammatory state could improve immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) clinical efficacy. This is a retrospective, multicenter, and observational study that included patients treated in a private Brazilian Oncology Group. Primary outcomes were the association of body mass index (BMI) category with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS). Secondary outcomes were association between BMI and objective response rate (ORR). In the total cohort, 448 patients were classified as a normal weight (43%), overweight (36%), obese (17%) and underweight (4%). The patients were predominantly male gender (62%), with stage IV lung cancer (57%) and melanoma (19%). The obese group (BMI ≥ 30 kg/m2) had a not statistically significant longer median OS than the non-obese group (BMI < 30 kg/m2) - 21.8 months (95% CI NR - NR) versus 14.9 months (95% CI 8.3 - 21.5); HR = 0.82, (95% CI 0.57 - 1.18, P = 0.28). Obese patients treated with anti-CTLA4 did not reach the mOS, while the non-obese group had a mOS of 23.1 months (P = 0.04). PFS did not differ between subgroups. Obese patients had also lower ORR, but without reaching statistical significance. In conclusion, this study did not report an improved OS among high BMI patients treated with ICI.

Background The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is hypothesized to have increased in the last 2 decades. Objective To define incidence trends according to patient and clinical characteristics, to identify risk factors, and to describe outcomes of patients with BM for RCC. Design, setting, and participants Patients diagnosed with RCC between the years 2010 and 2013 within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. An external validation was also considered using patients diagnosed with RCC between 2010 and 2012 within the National Cancer Database. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis Incidence proportions of BM were calculated. Risk factors correlated with BM at diagnosis were identified via a 1000-bootstrap corrected multivariable logistic regression model. A risk model was then developed and evaluated using measures of predictive accuracy. Overall survival was examined using Cox regression analyses. Results and limitations The overall incidence proportions of BM at RCC diagnosis was 1.51% (95% confidence interval: 1.39–1.64%). White/other race, clear cell histology, and sarcomatoid differentiation, T2–4 disease, tumor dimension >10 cm, and N+ disease were significantly associated with BM at RCC diagnosis, and retained within the final prediction model. A risk score was created based on these variables (c-index: 0.803). BM at RCC diagnosis occurred in 0.5%, 3.6%, and 7.7% of patients categorized as low risk, intermediate risk, and high risk. Patients with BM were more likely to succumb to any death than those without BM at diagnosis (median overall survival: 6.4 mo vs not reached, respectively, adjusted hazard ratio: 1.87, 95% confidence interval: 1.67–2.08, p Conclusions Patients with BM at RCC have poor oncological outcomes. We have characterized the epidemiology of BM at RCC diagnosis and developed a clinical risk model for the purpose of predicting the development of BMs in patients diagnosed with a cortical renal mass. Patient summary In this report we examined recent proportions of patients with brain metastases at kidney cancer diagnosis in a large community database originating from the US. We developed a model that may be used during routine clinical practice to predict brain metastases. The urologic-oncological community may consider baseline imaging for brain metastases in patients without any symptoms but at high risk of having brain metastases according to the risk model. However, the proposed model certainly needs further testing and validation in the clinical setting. Future studies on brain metastases survival and treatment options are also needed.

BACKGROUND To the authors' knowledge, outcomes and prognostic tools have yet to be clearly defined in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) who are treated with immuno-oncology (IO) checkpoint inhibitors (programmed death-ligand 1 [PD-L1] inhibitors). In the current study, the authors aimed to establish IO efficacy benchmarks in patients with mRCC and update patient outcomes in each International Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma Database Consortium (IMDC) prognostic class. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed using the IMDC database with data from 38 centers. It included patients with mRCC who were treated with ≥1 line of IO. Overall response rates (ORRs), duration of treatment (DOT), and overall survival (OS) were calculated. Patients were stratified using IMDC prognostic factors. RESULTS A total of 687 patients (90% with clear cell and 10% with non-clear cell) were included. The ORR was 27% in evaluable patients (461 patients). In patients treated with first-line nivolumab and ipilimumab (49 patients), the combination of PD-L1 inhibitor and vascular endothelial growth factor inhibitor (72 patients), and PD-L1 inhibitor (51 patients), the ORR was 31%, 39%, and 40%, respectively, and the median DOT was 8.3 months, 14.7 months, and 8.3 months, respectively. The ORR for second-line, third-line, and fourth-line nivolumab was 22%, 24%, and 26%, respectively. The median DOT was 5.7 months, 6.2 months, and 8.3 months, respectively, in the second-line, third-line, and fourth-line settings. When segregated into IMDC favorable-risk, intermediate-risk, and poor-risk groups, the median OS rates for the first-line, second-line, third-line, and fourth-line treatment settings were not reached (NR), NR, and NR, respectively (P = .163); NR, 26.7 months, and 7.4 months, respectively (P

Background: Non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) have demonstrated an anti-tumorigenic effect in several cancers. However, their use is associated with an increased risk in renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and their effect has not been assessed in patients with metastatic disease. Objective: We investigated the impact of NSAIDs on survival outcomes in patients with metastatic RCC (mRCC). Methods: We conducted a pooled retrospective analysis of 4,736 mRCC patients treated on phase II and III clinical trials. Patients were categorized as: aspirin (ASA) only users, non-ASA NSAIDs only users, ASA and non-ASA NSAIDs users, and NSAIDs non-users. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Progression free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR) and adverse events (AEs) were secondary endpoints. OS and PFS were estimated using the Kaplan–Meier method and were assessed using multivariate Cox regression analysis. Results: We identified 457 (10%) ASA only users, 639 (13%) non-ASA NSAIDs only users, 61 (1%) ASA and non-ASA NSAIDS users, and 3579 (76%) NSAIDs non-users. OS and PFS were significantly worse in non-ASA NSAIDs users compared to the NSAIDs non-users (OS hazard ratio (HR): 1.47, p

Background Overall survival (OS) is a critical endpoint in adjuvant trials but requires long durations to events and significant patient resources. In the current study, the authors assessed whether disease-free survival (DFS) can be an early clinical surrogate for OS in the adjuvant setting for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods Using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines, the authors performed a systematic literature review of PubMed and the American Society of Clinical Oncology, European Society for Medical Oncology, and ClinicalTrial.gov Web sites (1996-2016). Inclusion in the current study required randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of adjuvant systemic therapy for localized RCC after nephrectomy with ≥3 years of outcomes data. Data regarding hazard ratios (HRs) and 5-year event-free rates from Kaplan-Meier estimates were extracted. A trial-level meta-analysis correlated estimates of 5-year DFS and 5-year OS as well as treatment effects (HRs) on these endpoints, weighted by the number of DFS events. R-squared ≥ 0.7 was prespecified as being indicative of a strong correlation and the potential for surrogacy. Results Thirteen RCTs encompassing 6473 patients who were treated with a variety of systemic therapies met eligibility. Only a modest correlation was observed between 5-year DFS and 5-year OS rates (R-squared, 0.48; 95% confidence interval, 0.14-0.67) and between treatment effects as measured by DFS and OS HRs (R-squared, 0.44; 95% confidence interval, 0.00-0.69). Conclusions Across RCTs of adjuvant systemic therapy for localized RCC, there was no strong correlation noted between 5-year DFS and 5-year OS rates or between treatment effects on these endpoints. These results highlight the need to identify alternative and more rapid clinical or biologic endpoints to hasten drug development and improve clinical outcomes. Cancer 2018;124:925-33. © 2017 American Cancer Society.

Introduction Observational studies have suggested that metformin use is associated with favorable outcomes in several cancers. For renal cell carcinoma (RCC), data have been limited. Therefore, we investigated the effect of metformin on survival in metastatic RCC (mRCC) using a large clinical trial database. Patients and Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of patients with mRCC in phase II and III clinical trials. The overall survival (OS) in metformin users was compared with that of users of other antidiabetic agents and those not using antidiabetic agents. Progression-free survival, objective response rate, and adverse events were secondary endpoints. Subgroup analyses were conducted after stratifying by class of therapy, type of vascular endothelial growth factor tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) risk groups. Results We identified 4736 patients with mRCC, including 486 with diabetes, of whom 218 (4.6%) were taking metformin. Metformin use did not affect OS when compared with users of other antidiabetic agents or those without diabetes. Furthermore, metformin use did not confer an OS advantage when stratified by class of therapy and IMDC risk group. However, in diabetic patients receiving sunitinib (n = 128), metformin use was associated with an improvement in OS compared with users of other antidiabetic agents (29.3 vs. 20.9 months, respectively; hazard ratio, 0.051; 95% confidence interval, 0.009-0.292; P = .0008). Conclusion In the present study, we found a survival benefit for metformin use in mRCC patients treated with sunitinib. Clinical and preclinical studies are warranted to validate our results and guide the use of metformin in the clinic.

The mainstays of treatment for colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs) are surgery and chemotherapy. Chemotherapeutic benefits of tumor shrinkage and systemic control of micrometastases are in part counterbalanced by chemotoxicity that can modify the liver parenchyma, jeopardizing the detection of CRLM. This review addresses the clinical decision-making process in the context of radiographic and pathologic responses, the preoperative imaging workup, and the approaches to the liver for CRLM, which disappear after systemic chemotherapy.

Submitted by Biblioteca Suporte PUCRS (biblioteca.suporte@pucrs.br) on 2022-05-17T19:51:53Z No. of bitstreams: 2 The_Management_of_Immunerelated_Adverse_Events_Associated_with_Immune_Checkpoint_Blockade.pdf: 1038544 bytes, checksum: e8a15ed773d7b1c62603e0ad34ef8584 (MD5) The_Management_of_Immunerelated_Adverse_Events_Associated_with_Immune_Checkpoint_Blockade.pdf: 1038544 bytes, checksum: e8a15ed773d7b1c62603e0ad34ef8584 (MD5) Made available in DSpace on 2022-05-17T19:51:53Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 2 The_Management_of_Immunerelated_Adverse_Events_Associated_with_Immune_Checkpoint_Blockade.pdf: 1038544 bytes, checksum: e8a15ed773d7b1c62603e0ad34ef8584 (MD5) The_Management_of_Immunerelated_Adverse_Events_Associated_with_Immune_Checkpoint_Blockade.pdf: 1038544 bytes, checksum: e8a15ed773d7b1c62603e0ad34ef8584 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2016

e15066 Background: Obesity is linked to an increased risk of cancer development. The excess of body fatness seems to be associated with alterations in hormonal, metabolic and inflammatory pathways, that may lead to activation of the carcinogenesis process. Previous studies suggested this obesity pro-inflammatory state could improve ICI clinical efficacy. Methods: Baseline characteristics and clinical outcomes were retrospectively collected from advanced cancer patients of any primary site, and treated with ICI in our institution. The BMI was determined for all pts and categorized into 2 groups: obese (BMI≥30) and non-obese (BMI < 30). Primary outcomes were the association of BMI category with overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) assessed by log-rank statistic, and both were stratified by sex, age, treatment agent and primary tumor site using the Cox-regression. Secondary outcome was the association of BMI with objective response rate (ORR). Results: We collected data from 448 advanced cancer pts - 192 (43%) as normal weight, 159 (36%) as overweight, 78 (17%) as obese and 19 (4%) as underweight. A total of 370 pts (83%) were included in the non-obese group (BMI < 30) and 78 (17%) patients in the obese group (BMI≥30). The majority of pts (387 - 84%) received anti-PD-1/anti-PD-L1; 128 pts (28%) were treated at 1st line and 200 pts (44%) at 2nd line. The obese group experienced longer mOS than the non-obese group - 21.8 months (95% CI NR - NR) vs. 14.9 months (95% CI 8.3 -21.5); HR = 0.82, (95% CI 0.57-1.18, P = 0.28). However, this was not statistically significant and even after stratification. The obese group had an inferior mPFS than the non-obese group - 4.7 months (95% CI 3.8- 5.7) vs. 5.3 months (95% CI 3.45-7.15); - HR = 0.99, (95% CI 0.76 -1.30), P = 0.95. There was no significative difference in mPFS and ORR according to BMI. Conclusions: Although study did not report an improved OS among high BMI pts treated with ICI, our results suggested a trend in survival benefit. The BMI should be explored as a stratification variable in the design of prospective trials with advanced cancer pts and ICI treatment.

INTRODUCTION Cancer biology is characterised by genomic alterations. There is an ongoing revolution in cancer research due to the emergence of novel technologies based on next generation sequencing (NGS). OBJECTIVES To identify abnormalities in individual patients with the aim of providing targeted therapy matched to individuals genomic alterations. METHODS From April 2013, to February 2014, we included patients who had metastatic breast cancer with lesion accessible for biopsy. The tumor tissue stored in paraffin was evaluated by the method of next-generation sequencing (NGS) where 236 cancer-related genes were sequenced. ResultsPatientsTarget TherapyObjective ResponseMutations1EverolimusNOERBB2, PIK3CA2EverolimusYesPI3KCA, FGFR, AKT3EverolimusYesPI3KCA, FGFR4EverolimusYesAKT1, PI3KCA5EverolimusYesAKT16EverolimusYesAKT1, FGFR7EverolimusYesAKT1. FGFR8EverolimusNoERBB2, PI3KTable1 Mutations PrevalenceMutationPrevalenceTP5383,30%PIK3CA60,60%FGFR33%CCND125%PTEN25%BRCA216%AKT50%Table2 RESULTS Fourteen patients were included and NGS was feasible. An actionable genomic alteration was identified in 12 (85,7%) patients, most frequently in TP53 (10 [83,3%], PIK3CA (8 [66,6%]), AKT (5 [50%]), FGFR1 (4 [33%]), CCND1 (3 [25%]), PTEN (3[25%]) and BRCA2 (2[16%]). Therapy could be personalized in 12 of 14 patients. Of the 8 patients who received targeted therapy, 5 presented objective response. CONCLUSION . NGS was able to find genomic alterations in the majority of breast cancer tissues; . Most patients did not have "actionable" mutations for which a specific therapy could be offered; . We are just at the dawn of exploring this strategy and NGS can effectively contribute for increasing the understanding of the disease. REFERENCES 1. Jeffrey. Ross, Massimo Cristofanilli et al, JClin Oncol 3, 2013 (suppl; abster 1009). Citation Format: Raphael Brandao Moreira, Matheus Bongers Alessandretti, Antonio Carlos Buzaid, Marcelo Rocha Cruz. Personalized therapy in breast cancer: Brazilian experience [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-13-09.

Background: A considerable number of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer progress after exhausting all approved standard therapies but maintain an adequate performance status and could be candidates for further treatment. We aim at reviewing our experience with sorafenib treatment of a patient with FLT3 mutation in refractory metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Treatment with sorafenib of a patient with metastatic colorectal cancer and FLT3 translocation who had previously been heavily treated. Results: The patient with metastatic colorectal cancer, aged 51 years, showed significant symptomatic and laboratory improvement with sorafenib treatment (400 mg twice daily). Conclusion: The presented case illustrates how an aggressive and refractory colorectal tumor may respond well to targeted therapy.

Background Spontaneous regression of metastatic melanoma and delayed responses more than one year after treatment with ipilimumab are rarely seen. Case presentation Here, we present the case of a patient with in transit metastases from cutaneous melanoma on his right lower extremity who achieved complete regression of all metastatic lesions 13 months after the first of two consecutive palliative resections of dominant masses and more than two years after treatment with ipilimumab. Conclusion The exact cause of our patient’s sudden onset of tumor regression remains speculative. We hypothesize that the operative trauma followed by the postoperative infections augmented an innate immune response.

// Raphael B. Moreira 5 , Marcio Debiasi 2,4 , Edoardo Francini 1 , Pier V. Nuzzo 1,6 , Guillermo De Velasco 1 , Fernando C. Maluf 2,3 , Andre P. Fay 2,4 , Joaquim Bellmunt 1 , Toni K. Choueiri 1 and Fabio A. Schutz 2,3 1 Dana Farber Cancer Institute, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA 2 Latin American Cooperative Oncology Group, Partenon, Porto Alegre, Brazil 3 Centro Oncologico Antonio Ermirio de Moraes, Beneficencia Portuguesa de Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil 4 PUCRS School of Medicine, Porto Alegre, RS, Brazil 5 Hospital Alemao Oswaldo Cruz/Grupo Oncoclinicas do Brasil, Sao Paulo, SP, Brazil 6 University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy Correspondence to: Toni K. Choueiri, email: // Fabio A. Schutz, email: // Keywords : metastatic prostate cancer, abiraterone, enzalutamide, toxicity, meta-analysis Received : October 26, 2016 Accepted : March 08, 2017 Published : August 08, 2017 Abstract Background: Abiraterone and enzalutamide are currently approved for mCRPC patients. Both drugs have distinct mechanisms of action and may have different toxicity profile. There are limited data comparing the side effects of abiraterone and enzalutamide. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to better characterize the risk of adverse events associated with both drugs. Methods: We performed a literature search on MEDLINE for studies reporting abiraterone and enzalutamide side effects from January 1966 to July 31, 2015. Abstracts presented at ASCO meetings from 2004 to 2015 were selected manually. Phase III RCT were included in analysis. We assessed the risk of adverse events reported in RCT by performing two meta-analyses: abiraterone-prednisone vs. placebo-prednisone (2,283 pts) and enzalutamide vs. placebo (2,914 pts). Summary of incidence, relative-risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies. Results: Overall, enzalutamide was not associated with all-grade (RR 1.06 - 95% CI 0.67-1.65) or grade ≥3 (RR 0.81 - 95% CI 0.28-2.33) cardiovascular events, but was associated with increased risk of all-grade fatigue (RR 1.29 - 95% CI 1.15-1.44). On the other hand, abiraterone was associated with increased risk of all-grade (RR 1.28 - 95% CI 1.06-1.55) and grade ≥3 (RR 1.76 - 95% CI 1.12-2.75) cardiovascular events, but was not associated with all-grade (RR 0.85 - 95% CI 0.58-1.23) or grade ≥3 (RR 1.07 - 95% CI 0.97-1.19) fatigue. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, abiraterone was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, while enzalutamide was associated with an increased risk of fatigue.

e15153 Background: Right and left sided colon cancers (RC, LC) differ with respect to biology and response to therapy. Several retrospective analyses have assessed the clinical effect of epidermal growth fator receptor (EGFR) targeted agents in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) according to the primary tumor location. Differentiating only right from left. But can in the LC responses differ according to the distance from the anal verge (DAV)? Methods: Exploratory retrospective analyses was planned to evaluate if LC responses differ according to the DAV. LC was defined as tumors originating anywhere from the distal rectum to the left colic flexure (splenic flexure). DAV was describe in cm measured by previous to surgery or treatment, colonoscopy, CT or MRI. Patients were divided for analysis purposes in two groups: Group A (tumors above 12cm from de anal verge), Group B (tumors below 12cm from the anal verge). Results: We retrospectively evaluated 29 patients with left metastatic colorectal cancer treated with anti-EGFR therapy as part of their treatment at the Paulistano Hospital -São Paulo from 2011 to 2018. Median population age 51.8 years (48.5-62.3). Median DAV 14.5 (4.6-25 cm). Median follow-up 12.8 months. No significant difference on stable and partial response rate was detected (Group A 43.7% vs Gropup B 56.3%), p=0.211. Long-rank test with a median pFS 8,5 meses and a PFS at 6 months of 66.7 vs 78,8 (Group A and Group B respectively ), p=0.901. Two-year OS was 58.4 % in Group A and 100% in Group B, p=0.17. Conclusions: Although no significant diferences were detected, responses rates were numerically higher in patients with tumors located below 12 cm from the anal verge. Further studies are needed to evaluate the association between response and DAV.

Immune-related adverse events (irAE) have been described with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), but the incidence and relative risk (RR) of irAEs associated with these drugs remains unclear. We selected five key irAEs from treatments with approved cytotoxic T-lymphocyte–associated protein 4 (CTLA-4), programmed cell death 1 (PD-1), and programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitors (ipilimumab, nivolumab, or pembrolizumab, and atezolizumab, respectively) to better characterize their safety profile. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized phase II/III immunotherapy trials, with non-ICI control arms, conducted between 1996 and 2016. We calculated the incidence and RR of selected all-grade and high-grade gastrointestinal, liver, skin, endocrine, and pulmonary irAEs across the trials using random-effect models. Twenty-one trials were included, totaling 11,454 patients, of whom 6,528 received an ICI (nivolumab, 1,534; pembrolizumab, 1,522; atezolizumab, 751; and ipilimumab, 2,721) and 4,926 had not. Compared with non-ICI arms, ICIs were associated with more all-grade colitis (RR 7.66, P < 0.001), aspartate aminotransferase (AST) elevation (RR 1.80; P = 0.020), rash (RR 2.50; P = 0.001), hypothyroidism (RR 6.81; P < 0.001), and pneumonitis (RR 4.14; P = 0.012). Rates of high-grade colitis (RR 5.85; P < 0.001) and AST elevation (RR 2.79; P = 0.014) were higher in the ICI arms. Ipilimumab was associated with a higher risk of all-grade rash (P = 0.006) and high-grade colitis (P = 0.021) compared with PD-1/PD-L1 ICIs. Incidence of fatal irAE was < 1%. This meta-analysis offers substantial evidence that ICIs are associated with a small but significant increase in risk of selected all-grade irAEs and high-grade gastrointestinal and liver toxicities. Although fatal irAEs remain rare, AEs should be recognized promptly as early interventions may alleviate future complications. Cancer Immunol Res; 5(4); 312–8. ©2017 AACR.

4580 Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) checkpoint inhibitor treatment outcomes are poorly characterized in the real world metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) patient population, including geriatric patients. Methods: Using the IMDC database, a retrospective analysis was performed on mRCC patients treated with IO, as listed below. Patients received one or more lines of IO therapy, with or without a targeted agent. Duration of treatment (DOT) and overall response rates (ORR) were calculated. Cox regression analysis was performed to examine the association between age as a continuous variable and DOT. Results: 312 mRCC patients treated with IO were included. In patients who were evaluable, ORR to IO therapy was 29% (32% first-, 22% second-, 33% third-, and 32% fourth-line treatment (Tx)). Patients treated with second-line IO therapy were divided into favorable, intermediate, and poor risk using IMDC criteria; the corresponding median DOT rates were not reached (NR), 8.6 mo, and 1.9 mo, respectively (p

e23166 Background: Treatment for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) has been driven by hormone receptors, HER2 expressions or their absence. Resistance to therapy and progressive disease will occur and empirical chemotherapy lines usually are the next steps. We aim to analyze the role of next-generation sequencing (NGS) for a personalized therapy in metastatic breast cancer and its potential clinical benefit. Methods: We included patients diagnosed with MBC treated at Centro Oncologico Antonio Ermirio de Moraes – Brazil from April 2013 to December 2016. All patients had metastasis accessible for biopsy. The tumor tissue was stored in paraffin and then analyzed by NGS-based assay that identifies genomic alterations within 236 genes. Results: 19 patients with MBC were evaluated (10 triple-negative; 4 HER2-positive; 5 hormonal receptor positive/HER2-negative). The most frequent and relevant genomic alterations identified by NGS assay were in the following genes: 13 TP53 (68.4%); 4 ERBB2 (21%); 4 PTEN (21%); 4 FGFR (21%); 3 PIK3CA (15.8%); 2 BRCA (10.5%); 2 ATM (10.5%); 2 AKT (10.5%); 2 MYC (10.5%); 1 CCND1 (5.3%); and 1 KRAS (5.3%). The NGS assay was able to suggest further therapy in 16/19 patients (84%). The suggested therapies would not be an empirical option according to the cancer’s subtype in 12/16 patients (75%). Therapy could be personalized in nine patients, across multiple lines of therapies (median of 5th line, with a range of 1-14). Median PFS was 6 months, and 8/9 patients (90%) achieved an objective response with the treatment indicated by NGS. Therefore, the assay provided clinical benefit in 42% of patients. Conclusions: NGS panel identified potentially actionable alterations in the majority of patients with MBC (84%). The overall clinical benefit with use of NGS-based assay was 42%. Further studies are necessary to better evaluate the role of NGS for a personalized therapy in MBC.

4585 Background: Adjuvant trials aim to integrate systemic therapy earlier to increase cure rates over surgery alone. Overall survival (OS) is a critical endpoint for these studies but requires long durations to events and significant patient resources. We explored the potential use of disease-free survival (DFS) as an intermediate readout for OS in the adjuvant setting for localized renal cell carcinoma (RCC). Methods: We performed a systematic literature review following the PRISMA guidelines. Inclusion criteria required randomized controlled trials (RCT) for adjuvant systemic therapy in localized RCC, which reported on both DFS and OS. Data on hazard ratio (HR) and 5-year event-free rate from Kaplan-Meier estimates were extracted. We performed a trial level meta-analysis and correlated these estimates for OS and DFS, weighted by the number of DFS events. R-square > 0.7 would indicate a strong correlation and potential for surrogacy. Results: Thirteen RCTs encompassing 6,473 patients treated with various forms of systemic therapy were eligible for the analyses. Minimum follow-up was 40 months. There was a moderate correlation between 5-year DFS and 5-year OS rates (R-square = 0.49, 95% CI:0.15-0.68) and between treatment effects as measured by DFS and OS hazard ratios (R-square = 0.44, 95% CI:0.00-0.69). Conclusions: Across trials of adjuvant systemic therapy for localized RCC, we observed a moderate correlation between 5-year DFS and OS rates and between treatment effects (HRs) on these endpoints. Further granularity may be achieved using individual patient data to assess different and earlier time points for surrogacy than are commonly reported. [Table: see text]

331 Background: The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) before radical cystectomy (RC) is supported by results from several randomized control trials, including SWOG-8710. We sought to test the applicability of the SWOG-8710 study in the general population. Methods: We used the National Cancer Data Base (NCDB) to identify patients with non-metastatic muscle-invasive urothelial carcinoma of the bladder who underwent RC between 2004 and 2012. The primary endpoint was overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were rates of downstaging (pT0), positive pathologic lymph nodes (pN+), margin status, postoperative readmission, length of hospital stay (LOS), and 30 and 90-day postoperative mortality rates. OS comparison using Cox regression analysis was conducted. Furthermore, logistic regression models examining secondary outcomes were fitted. To adjust for potential selection bias, propensity score weighted analyses were performed. Results: Of 8732 patients who underwent RC, 1619 (19%) received NAC. Compared to the SWOG-8710 cohort, our population was older, more commonly female (p=0.002), and had higher clinical stage (p

Blockade of the PD1/PD-L1 T cell immune checkpoint yields responses and survival benefits exceeding mTOR blockade alone in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC). However, predictors of response to anti-PD1/PD-L1 therapy are mostly unknown, and pathways of acquired resistance to immune checkpoint therapy are poorly understood. In this study, we undertook whole exome sequencing and neoantigen analysis of matched “trios” (primary tumor resection, immune-checkpoint-refractory metastasis, and germline tissue) from 3 patients treated with anti-PD1 or anti-PD-L1 therapy for mRCC. Patients RCC-001 and RC-002 received anti-PD1 therapy after VEGF-targeted therapy and patient RCC-003 received anti-PD-L1 first-line for mRCC. All 3 patients experienced tumor regression on immune checkpoint therapy, with treatment durations of 10 months, 2 years, and 3 months, respectively. Progressive disease samples were sequenced for analysis of genomic mechanisms of treatment resistance. Whole transcriptome sequencing was obtained on primary and metastatic tumors from RCC-003. Nonsynonymous mutation load was moderate in all samples (range: 33-46 primary, 36-67 resistant). Alterations in VHL were seen in RCC-001 and RCC-002 before and after treatment. RCC-003 had a frameshift deletion in the tumor suppressor NF2 and a nonsense mutation in the MHCI antigen-processing protein TAP1 in both primary and refractory tumors. Resistance-associated mutations in RCC-002 included a frameshift deletion in MR1, involved in MHC I antigen presentation, and missense mutations in TJP1, implicated in JAK/STAT signaling, and PIAS2, implicated in STAT2 and PTEN regulation. JAK2 amplifications have been found to upregulate PD-L1 expression (Green et al. 2010, Blood), and PTEN loss mediates resistance to T cell-mediated immmunotherapy in vitro (Peng et al. 2016, Cancer Discovery). None of the primary tumors harbored alterations in microsatellite-instability-associated genes, and loss of β2 microglobulin was not observed in any sample. Despite moderate mutational loads, each sample harbored a sizeable number of neoantigens (range: 24-76 primary, 50-104 resistant). Across the 6 samples, 28 to 69% of nonsynonymous mutations were predicted to yield at least one neoantigen, with one alteration yielding a maximum of 12 unique neoantigens. Up to 60% of neoantigens observed in the primary tumor were not seen in the resistant setting (range: 20.8-59.2%). Whole transcriptome sequencing in RCC-003 showed 18/24 predicted neoantigens were expressed in the primary tumor and 24/50 in the refractory sample. 13 neoantigens were shared between the two samples, while 5 were unique to the pre-treatment tumor. Integrated whole exome and whole transcriptome sequencing with matched germline profiling identified 5 neoantigens in RCC-003 that were found exclusively in the primary tumor (lost in the treatment-resistant tumor). This could represent immune evasion via deletion of immunogenic mutations, cytotoxic killing of immunogenic tumor clones, or intrinsic resistance to immune checkpoint therapy in heterogenous tumors. Ongoing in vitro analysis of reactivity of predicted neoantigens from all 3 samples with patient-derived T cells will further clarify the biological significance these putative tumor antigens. Citation Format: Diana Miao, Guillermo De Velasco, Dennis Adeegbe, Craig Norton, Dylan Martini, Stephanie Mullane, Raphael Moreira, Sabina Signoretti, Kwok-Kin Wong, Toni Choueiri, Eliezer Van Allen. Genomic and neoantigen evolution and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade in metastatic renal cell carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Tumor Immunology and Immunotherapy; 2016 Oct 20-23; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Immunol Res 2017;5(3 Suppl):Abstract nr A18.

459 Background: OS is a critical endpoint for adjuvant RCC trials testing the benefit of early systemic therapy to increase cure rates, but requires long duration and significant patient resources. We explored the potential use of DFS as a surrogate for OS when assessing the efficacy of adjuvant therapy in localized RCC. Methods: We performed a systematic literature review following the PRISMA statement. Inclusion criteria required randomized controlled trials (RCT) for adjuvant systemic therapy in localized RCC, which reported on both DFS and OS. DFS was defined from randomization or nephrectomy (R/N) to the first evidence of clinical recurrence (loco-regional or distant) or death from any cause. OS was defined from R/N to death from any cause. We extracted data on hazard ratio (HR) and 5-year event free rate from Kaplan Meier estimates. We performed a meta-analysis and correlated these estimates for OS and DFS, weighted by number of DFS events. R-square >0.7 would indicate a strong correlation and potential surrogacy. Results: Of the more than 315 studies screened, 10 studies investigating various forms of cytokine and vaccine immunotherapy and angiogenesis inhibitors (e.g., sunitinib, sorafenib, thalidomide) between 1987 and 2016 were eligible for the analyses. The total enrolled patients were 5,497, with median follow-up ranging 3 to 10 years. Conclusions: Across trials of adjuvant systemic therapy for localized RCC, we observed a moderate correlation between 5 yr DFS and OS rate and between treatment effects (HRs) on these endpoints. Future meta-analyses of more mature trials in the era of modern adjuvant targeted therapy are needed to evaluate the surrogacy of intermediate endpoints. Further granularity may be achieved using individual patient data to assess different and earlier time points for surrogacy than are commonly reported. [Table: see text]

529 Background: The incidence of brain metastases (BM) in patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC) is hypothesized to have increased in the last two decades.Our objective was to provide an overview of recent incidence trends in patients with primary renal cell carcinoma (RCC) and BM at diagnosis using a nationally representative cancer cohort originating from the US. Secondary objectives include developing a tool for prediction of BM at diagnosis and to assess their oncological outcomes, and externally validating it in second database. Methods: All patients with a primary diagnostic confirmation of RCC within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER, 2010–2013) database and the National Cancer Database (NCDB, 2010–2012) were abstracted. The incidence proportions (% IP) and 95% confidence intervals (CI) of BM were calculated. A 1000-bootstrap corrected multivariable logistic regression models was developed for prediction of BM at diagnosis using the SEER cohort. Backward variable selection was conducted to identify the most parsimonious model. Model performance was evaluated via measures of predictive accuracy in the NCDB cohort. Results: The overall % IP of BM at RCC diagnosis was 1.51% (95% CI: 1.39–1.64) in the SEER and 1.37% (95% CI: 1.29–1.45%) in the NCDB. The odds of harbouring BM at RCC diagnosis varied significantly according to sociodemographic and clinical characteristics. Following backward variable selection within the SEER database, only histology, tumor size, and cN stages were retained in the final model. Predictive accuracy was adequate in the external validation cohort (C-statistic: 0.778). Median time to any death was 6.37 months in patients with BM. After adjusting for confounders, patients with BM were more likely to succumb to any death than those without BM at diagnosis (hazard ratio: 1.87, 95% CI: 1.71–2.05, p

492 Background: Immuno-oncology (IO) checkpoint inhibitors have demonstrated efficacy in metastatic renal cell cancer (mRCC) treatment. Real world data is required to assess outcomes when applied to the general population. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed using the IMDC database. It included mRCC patients treated with IO agents, including atezolizumab (Atezo), avelumab, ipilimumab, nivolumab (Nivo), and pembrolizumab (Pembro). Some patients were treated with combination therapy with a targeted agent. Patients may have received IO therapy as first-, second-, third-, or fourth-line treatment. Overall survival (OS), treatment duration, and overall response rates (ORR) were calculated. Results: 255 patients with mRCC treated with IO therapy were included. The ORR to IO therapy in those patients who were evaluable was 29% (32% first-, 22% second-, 33% third-, and 32% fourth-line therapy). Patients treated with second-line IO therapy were divided into favorable, intermediate, and poor risk using IMDC criteria; the corresponding median OS rates were not reached, 26.7 mo, and 12.1 mo, respectively (p

482 Background: PD1/PDL1 inhibitors have shown significant activity in the treatment of patients (pts) with metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC), but their activity in nccRCC is poorly characterized. Methods: We conducted a retrospective multicenter study of pts with metastatic nccRCC treated with PD1/PDL1 inhibitors. Baseline clinical parameters, overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST, time-to-treatment failure (TTF), and overall survival (OS) were summarized. Results: We identified 40 pts across 8 academic institutions. Fourteen (35%) had papillary histology, 10 (25%) chromophobe, 3 (8%) translocation, and 7 (18%) unclassified. Six (16%) had ccRCC with a sarcomatoid component > 30%. 20% had International Metastatic RCC Database Consortium (IMDC) favorable-risk disease, 60% intermediate, and 20% poor-risk. Ten (25%) were treatment-naïve and the majority received PD1/PDL1 monotherapy (n=30, 75%), while the remaining received a combination of PD1/PDL1 with anti-VEGF(R) or anti-CTLA4 therapy. ORR for the total cohort was 18% and 10% for PD1/PDL1 monotherapy pts (Table). With a median follow-up of 5.6 months, the overall median TTF was 4.7 months (2.9-15.9) and six-month OS was 81% (60-91%). Conclusions: PD1/PDL1 blockade resulted in some activity in pts with various nccRCC histologies. In the absence of available clinical trials, this data may support the use of PD1/PDL1 blocking agents in pts with nccRCC. [Table: see text]

467 Background: Nivolumab, a monoclonal antibody against PD-1, has been shown to improve survival for pts with mRCC. The current standard of care is to administer treatment on a continuous basis until progression or toxicity. Outcomes of pts who experience a response to treatment and then discontinue therapy for irAEs have not been fully characterized. The purpose of this analysis was to evaluate outcomes of responders to PD-1/PD-L1 targeted therapy (TT) who discontinue treatment for irAEs. Methods: We identified pts with mRCC having experienced a response to PD-1/PD-L1 TT, which was subsequently discontinued for an irAE. Clinical characteristics, response, and survival data were collected. Results: We identified 9 mRCC pts who were treated with a PD-1/PD-L1 inhibitor, experienced a response to therapy, and subsequently discontinued treatment for an irAE. 8 had clear cell histology and 1 had translocation RCC. 7 pts were treatment naive. 2 pts had International mRCC Database Consortium favorable risk, 4 intermediate risk, and 3 poor risk disease. 44% (n = 4) of pts received PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy and the overall median duration of therapy was 5 months (mos) (range 4-15). There was 1 complete response, 7 partial responses, and 1 stable disease (17% shrinkage). Treatment was discontinued for the following irAEs: arthritis, uveitis, arthropathy, hypophysitis, myositis, blepharitis, hepatitis, rash, pericarditis, and amylase and lipase elevations. After PD-1/PD-L1 treatment discontinuation, 4 (44%) pts remained progression free with a median time off therapy of 20 mos (range 10-44) and median time on therapy of 9 mos (range 4-15). 5 (56%) pts progressed within 6 mos (range 2-6) of treatment discontinuation and median time on therapy was 4 mos (range 3-10). Conclusions: We demonstrate that some pts can have persistent clinical benefit after discontinuation of PD-1/PD-L1 TT for irAEs. Larger studies are warranted to evaluate the need for continuous drug dosing in all pts, identify pts in which continuous dosing is not required, and evaluate long-term outcomes in this population.

477 Background: PD-1 blockade with nivolumab has demonstrated efficacy in mccRCC patients who have failed prior therapy; however, durable benefit is observed only in a subset of patients. Correlative studies have demonstrated that tumor PD-L1 expression alone fails to reliably identify patients likely to benefit. Therefore, the development of more robust predictive markers is warranted. Methods: We studied 20 mccRCC patients treated with nivolumab (n=17) or atezolizumab (n=3) with distinct clinical outcomes: 8 pts who experienced durable clinical benefit (DCB) for ≥ 12 months and 12 pts with limited clinical benefit (LCB) for ≤ 6 months from start of therapy. Expression of PD-L1 and PD-L2 on tumor cells and density of tumor infiltrating CD8+ T cells and Foxp3+ cells were evaluated by immunohistochemistry. Percentages of tumor infiltrating CD8+T cells expressing the immune-inhibitory molecules PD-1, TIM-3, or LAG-3 either alone or in combination were determined by multiplex immunofluorescence, using the Inform algorithm (Perkin Elmer). The association between clinical benefit (CB) and biomarker expression was assessed using Fisher exact test. Results: Baseline patient characteristics were similar in the DCB and LCB groups. When analyzed separately, tumor cell expression of PD-L1 or PD-L2 showed no association with CB. However, when positivity was defined as expression of either or both PD-L1(≥ 1% cutoff) and PD-L2 (≥ 5% cutoff), a significant association with CB was found (7/8 DCB vs 4/11 LCB, p = 0.04). A low percentage of tumor infiltrating CD8+PD-1+ T cells co-expressing either or both TIM-3 and LAG-3 (75thpercentile cutoff) was also significantly associated with CB (8/8 DCB vs 7/12 LCB, p = 0.05). Conclusions: Our results suggest that expression of a PD-1 ligand on tumor cells (PD-L1 and/or PD-L2), and a low percentage of severely exhausted T cells, i.e. CD8+PD-1+ T-cells co-expressing the immune-inhibitory receptors TIM-3 and/or LAG-3, might represent valuable predictive biomarkers for response to PD-1 blockade in mccRCC. Independent validation in a larger patient cohort is ongoing.

498 Background: Fourthline targeted therapy efficacy in mRCC is not well characterized and is not reimbursed in many jurisdictions worldwide. Methods: The IMDC consists of consecutive patient series from 35 international cancer centers. It was queried for mRCC patients who received fourth line targeted therapy. Kaplan Meier estimates were used for time to treatment failure (TTF) and overall survival (OS). Results: 594 out of 7498 (8%) mRCC patients initially treated with first line targeted therapy eventually received fourth line therapy from a class of approved agents. Baseline characteristics are displayed in Table 1. The most common fourth line therapies were everolimus 17%, sorafenib 15%, axitinib 13%, pazopanib 13%, sunitinib 13%, nivolumab 7%. IMDC prognostic group distributions (Heng et al JCO 2009) and their associated survivals (both determined from fourth line therapy initiation) were 5% favorable risk (OS 23.1 (14.7-not reached)), 66% intermediate risk (OS 13.8 (11.4-17.5)), and 29% poor risk (OS 7.8 (4.93-12.2)) (OS p

Malignant pineal tumors are rare entities in adult patients, comprising less than 1% of primary central nervous system neoplasms. Herein, we report a 51 - years - old patient with pineoblastoma with clinical manifestation, follow up MRI, treatment receive and the response to chemotherapy treatment. Adjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin, etoposide and cyclophosphamide followed by radiotherapy has also been used to manage pineoblastoma in adults. The present case suggests that the case which total gross resection is not feasible, delivering chemotherapy instead of radiotherapy, can be considered an option.

73 Background: Abiraterone and enzalutamide are currently approved for mCRPC patients. Both drugs have distinct mechanisms of action and may have different toxicity profile. There are limited data comparing the side effects of abiraterone and enzalutamide. We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCT) to better characterize the risk of adverse events associated with both drugs. Methods: We performed a literature search on MEDLINE for studies reported from January 1966 to July 31, 2015. Abstracts presented at ASCO meetings from 2004 to 2015 were selected manually. Phase III RCT were included in analysis. We assessed the risk of adverse events reported in RCT by performing two meta-analysis: abiraterone-prednisone vs. placebo-prednisone (2,283 pts) and enzalutamide vs. placebo (2,914 pts). Summary of incidence, relative-risks (RR), and 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated using random-effects or fixed-effects models based on the heterogeneity of included studies. Results: Overall, enzalutamide was not associated with all-grade (RR 1.06 - 95% CI 0.67-1.65) or grade ≥3 (RR 0.81 - 95% CI 0.28-2.33) cardiovascular events, but was associated with increased risk of all-grade fatigue (RR 1.29 - 95% CI 1.15-1.44). On the other hand, abiraterone was associated with increased risk of all-grade (RR 1.28 - 95% CI 1.06-1.55) and grade ≥3 (RR 1.76 - 95% CI 1.12-2.75) cardiovascular events, but was not associated with all-grade (RR 0.85 - 95% CI 0.58-1.23) or grade ≥3 (RR 1.07 - 95% CI 0.97-1.19) fatigue. No evidence of publication bias was observed. Conclusions: In this meta-analysis, abiraterone was associated with an increased risk of cardiovascular events, while enzalutamide was associated with an increased risk of fatigue.

133 Background: A considerable number of patients with mBC progress after exhausting all approved standard therapies but maintain an adequate performance status and could be candidates for further treatment. We aim at reviewing our experience with the use of a NGS platform in refractory mBC and its clinical utility. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed demographics, NGS results, and the suggested therapies received by patients undergoing NGS (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA): exonic sequencing of 315 genes and selective intronic sequencing from 28 genes for refractory mBC. Co-primary endpoints were the percentage of patients with targeted therapy options uncovered by mutational profiling and the percentage of them who received genotype-directed therapy. Results: Samples from 20 patients were tested. Histologic subtype consisted of triple negative (50%), HER 2 +, hormonal receptor [HR] - 15%, HR + and HER 2 - (35%). A targetable genomic alteration was identified in 14 (70%) patients, most frequently in TP53 (11 [55%]), PIK3CA (8 [40%]), FGFR1 (4 [20%]), CCND1 (3 [15%]), PTEN (3[15%]) and BRCA2 (2[10%]). Therapy could be personalized in 9 (45%) of 14 patients. Of the 9 patients who were received targeted therapy, 7 (77%) had an objective response and had stable disease for more than 3 months. Conclusions: Mutational profiling using a targeted NGS panel identified potentially actionable alterations in the majority of advanced breast cancer patients. The assay provided clinical benefit in 35% of the patients.

e19115 Background: Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is known to harbor molecular mutations or rearrangements predictive to a variety of targeted therapies, which have been increasing the overall ...

e12521 Background: Several patients with lung cancer (LC) maintain good performance status even after disease progression following all standard therapies. More recently, targeted therapies have be...

e22175 Background: Several patients with advanced cancer maintain good performance status even after disease progression following all standard therapies. Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is a powe...

e20073 Background: The long term survival impact of biochemotherapy (BioCT) for patients with metastatic melanoma (MM) is not well established in the literature. We performed a retrospective analys...

e19069 Background: Brain metastasis (BM) are an event relatively frequent in the clinical course of patients with lung adenocarcinoma. Despite all advances in therapeutical approach, it still has a dismal prognosis. I Identifying subgroups with a higher propensity for BM may be useful to follow those patients closer and therefore offer them earlier brain treatment. We aimed at evaluating whether patients harboring EGFR activating mutations are at a higher risk for BM compared to those without such mutations Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data of 306 patients with lung adenocarcinoma at Sao Jose Hospital in Sao Paulo, Brazil, in the past 5 years. Results: Of the 306 patients analyzed, 52 (16,9%) had EGFR mutations and we identified BM in 19 of them (36,5%). Amongst the other 254 patients, we excluded 151 because records were not well-documented for BM or EGFR status, remaining 103 patients certainly EGFR negative and that underwent a brain image. Of those 103, BM were identified in 26 (25,2%). There ...

e21521 Background: Inoperable sarcoma may be associated with limiting local symptoms . To date, there are no data regarding the efficacy of palliative intra-arterial cisplatin for unresectable sarc...

72 Background: A considerable number of patients with mGIC progress after exhausting all approved standard therapies but maintain an adequate performance status and could be candidates for further treatment. We aim at reviewing our experience with the use of a NGS platform in refractory mGIC and its clinical utility. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed demographics, NGS results, and the suggested therapies received by patients undergoing NGS (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA): exonic sequencing of 236 genes and selective intronic sequencing from 19 genes for refractory mGIC. Co-primary endpoints were the percentage of patients with targeted therapy options uncovered by mutational profiling and the percentage of them who received genotype-directed therapy. Results: Samples from 32 patients were tested. Primary tumors consisted of colorectal adenocarcinoma (37,5%), pancreatic adenocarcinoma (31,2%), gastric adenocarcinoma (12,5%), cholangiocarcinoma (12,5%) and hepatocellular carcinoma (6%). Most patients (87,5%) were found to harbor potentially actionable genetic alterations involving mitogen-activated protein kinase (93,7%), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase-AKT (18,7%), p53 (50%) and cell-cycle regulation (9%) pathways. Of the 6 patients who received the suggested targeted therapy, 4 achieved an objective response. Conclusions: Mutational profiling using a targeted NGS panel identified potentially actionable alterations in the majority of advanced gastrointestinal cancer patients. The assay provided clinical benefit in 12% of the patients.

458 Background: FOLFIRINOX was found to have higher response rates and overall survival (OS) compared to gemcitabine-based regimens in the metastatic setting. However, the contribution of chemoradiotherapy to outcomes after FOLFIRINOX in LAPC remains uncertain. We aim at evaluating our experience with FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiation (IMRT) with capecitabine for patients with LAPC. Methods: Patients with unresectable LAPC who received induction FOLFIRINOX (5-fluorouracil, leucovorin, irinotecan and oxaliplatin) followed by chemoradiation with capecitabine at our institution were screened and accrued at the time of radiotherapy and are being followed prospectively. Radiation technique consisted of IMRT with simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) - dose of 45 Gy (1.8Gy/day) to high-risk lymph nodes and 55 Gy (2.2Gy/day) to the primary tumor. Progression-free survival (PFS) and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: Fourteen patients (58% female) were included in the analyses. Median age at diagnosis of LAPC was 61 years (range 38-78). Median number of FOLFIRINOX cycles was 11 (range 4-13). With a median follow up fo 11.7 months, 43% of the patients have died. Median PFS and OS were 15.9 (95% CI 6.8 – 25.1) and 16.7 months (95% CI 10.9 – 22.4), respectively. There were no treatment-related deaths. Conclusions: Our data suggest that sequential treatment with FOLFIRINOX followed by chemoradiation with capecitabine is feasible and may offer promising PFS and OS among selected patients with LAPC. Randomized trials are urgently needed to assess the role of sequential treatment in this population.

315 Background: Metastatic PA is a lethal malignancy with poor prognosis and limited therapeutic options. We hypothesized that a comprehensive next-generation sequencing (NGS) assay could identify novel therapy targets not routinely explored in PA patients. Methods: We included patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (PA) with accessible lesion for biopsy. Paraffin-embedded tumor tissues were evaluated by the method of NGS (Foundation Medicine, Cambridge, MA, USA). Hybridization capture of 3,769 exons from 236 cancer-related genes and 47 introns of 19 genes commonly rearranged in cancer was applied to ≥ 50 ng of DNA extracted from 10 PA specimens and sequenced to high, uniform coverage. Genomic alterations (GAs), were characterized and reported for each patient sample. Actionable GAs were defined as those identifying anti-cancer targeted therapies either available on the market or in registered clinical trials. Results: A total of 10 PA patients were included. Median age was 56 years (range 31-79). All cases harbored at least one GA with a mean of 2.7 actionable GAs per tumor. The most common actionable GAs were KRAS (90%), PTCH1 (20%), STK11 (10%) and GNAS (10%). KRAS mutations potentially treatable with MEK-inhibitor were identified in 9 patients. However, none of them received a MEK-inhibitor. Activating STK11 point mutations not detectable by IHC/FISH, potentially targetable with m-Tor inhibitor therapies were identified in 1 patient, who received everolimus and had a long-lasting (> 6 months) partial response. Conclusions: NGS of PA was able to reveal genomic alterations that may be potentially responsive to available targeted therapy. We are just at the dawn of exploring this strategy and NGS can effectively contribute for increasing the understanding of the disease.

216 Background: Despite a large number of randomized trials, there is no consensus as to the best regimen for advanced gastroesophageal cancer. Combination therapy with docetaxel, cisplatin, and 5-FU has shown increased response rates, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), but at the cost of significant toxicity. Based on a small phase II study, FLOT has been adopted by some groups given its better toxicity profile. We aim at reporting our experience with this regimen Methods: Patients with unresectable advanced gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma who received FLOT (oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2, leucovorin 200 mg/m2, and fluorouracil 2600 mg/m2 as a 24h infusion in combination with docetaxel 50 mg/m2 on day 1 every 2 weeks) as first-line therapy at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. PFS and OS were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 23 patients were reviewed, most of them with metastatic disease (60%). Median age was 56 years (range 26–76) and 74% were male. Median PFS and OS were 5,2 (95% CI 4,0-6,3) and 8,5 months (95% CI 4,4-12,6), respectively. Only 13%of the patients experienced prolonged PFS (>12 months). There were no deaths due to the treatment. Conclusions: Before FLOT could be adopted as a first-line regimen for metastatic gastroesophageal cancer, phase III trials are urgently needed comparing FLOT with more traditional regimens.

473 Background: Cancer of the exocrine pancreas is a highly lethal malignancy. Based on a phase III study, FOLFIRINOX regimen became the standard first-line treatment for patients with good performance status. However, the optimal management strategy for patients who fail initial FOLFIRINOX remains undefined. We aim at reporting our experience with single-agent gemcitabine as a second-line treatment for advanced pancreatic cancer patients who progressed on FOLFIRINOX. Methods: Patients with advanced exocrine pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received gemcitabine (1.000 mg/m² on days 1, 8 and 15 every 4 weeks) until disease progression, as second-line therapy after FOLFIRINOX failure at our institution were retrospectively evaluated. Progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were estimated by the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: A total of 20 patients were reviewed. Most of them (60%) had metastatic disease while 40% had locally advanced tumors. Median age was 60 years (range 43–74) and 80% were male. Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status was 0 or 1 in 65% and 2 or 3 in 35% of the patients. Median time on prior FOLFIRINOX therapy was 5 months. Median PFS and OS with gemcitabine were 2,0 (95% CI 1,2-2,8) and 5,7 months (95% CI 3,9-7,4), respectively. There were no deaths due to the treatment. Conclusions: In this study, gemcitabine was a reasonable second-line treatment option for patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Phase III trials are urgently needed exploring the role of gemcitabine in the second-line setting.

468 Background: There is only limited data regarding efficacy and safety of FOLFIRINOX in elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. We aim to evaluate our experience with dose-reduced FOLFIRINOX in patients > 65 years-old. Methods: All patients > 65 years-old with biopsy-proven advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma who received at least one cycle of modified dose-attenuatedFOLFIRINOX (no bolus FU and reduced dose of oxaliplatin and/or irinotecan) at our institution were identified. Results: Twenty-one consecutive patients (62% males) were reviewed. Median age was 67 (range 65-79). Grade 3/4 toxicities were reported in 7 (33%) patients ; the most common toxicities were anemia (62%), and nausea/vomiting (45%). Elevations in AST and/or ALT above the upper limit of normality were identified in 38%. No deaths due to toxicities were reported. Prophylactic granulocyte colony stimulator factor (G-CSF) was given in 16 (70 %) patients. Dose reductions were substantial with median reductions of 27,8 % (range 15 - 50%) for 5-FU, 27,1% (range 6-50%) for oxaliplatin and 25% (range 12-75%) for irinotecan. Median overall survival (OS) was 11,8 months (95% CI 10,2 - 13,3). Median progression free survival (PFS) was 6,9 months (95% CI 5,3 - 8,5). Conclusions: Modified dose-attenuated FOLFIRINOX is a reasonable option for elderly patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. Adverse events were manageable and no deaths due to toxicity were reported. Median OS and PFS were similar to the pivotal phase III trial, demonstrating that dose-attenuated FOLFIRINOX may be beneficial to elderly patients.