Search

Background Giant splenic artery pseudoaneurysms (GSAPs) > 5 cm are a rare clinical entity. The aim of this study was to present our experience with 2 such patients successfully treated by coil embolization and surgery and review the pertinent literature. Methods A 58-year-old woman and 57-year-old man with a history of chronic pancreatitis were diagnosed with GSAP based on computed tomography (CT) angiography. The first patient had a 6-cm pseudoaneurysm, which was successfully treated with transcatheter coil embolization using a sandwich exclusion method. The second patient had two 7-cm lesions, which were successfully treated with distal pancreatectomy and splenectomy. Results Postembolization CT angiography at 12 months showed remaining calcified pseudocyst without evidence of pseudoaneurysm in the first patient. Both patients remained well and symptom-free at 12 months. Conclusions Combined with the experience of the previous literature, we believe that management of GSAP should be tailored for each individual case depending on the location and number of pseudoaneurysms, the underlying etiology, and the patient's hemodynamic status. Embolization should be considered as the first-line treatment for clinically stable patients with GSAP, whereas GSAPs with a pseudocyst are best treated with surgery.

92 Background: Adjuvant chemotherapy is the current worldwide standard of care for stage III colorectal cancer (CRC) but it leads to significant neurotoxicity. We have shown in 2 cohorts of CRC patients treated with Oxaliplatin (Ox) that Ox-due neuropathy occurred in patients receiving an excess of 3.09 mg Ox/ kg Lean Body Mass (LBM). The aim of this trial was to determine whether the Ox dose adaptation based on the LBM index can reduce neurotoxicity, in patients treated for a stage III CRC. Methods: LEANOX is a randomized phase II multicentre study in patients eligible for an Ox regimen as adjuvant chemotherapy for CRC. Patients without sarcopenia (LBM index

Summary Background & aims Nutrition support is recommended in cachexic patients with cancer. However, there is no clear evidence about its impact on tumour growth. Glycolysis, which is usually higher in cancer than normal cells, can be monitored by 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging that is widely used for cancer staging and therapy efficacy assessment. Here, we used 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging to investigate whether artificial nutrition has an impact on tumour glucose metabolism in patients with cancer and cachexia. Methods This prospective study included ten patients with histologically proven head and neck or oesophageal cancer. All patients underwent 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging at baseline and after (parenteral and/or enteral) nutrition support on average for 7 days. Tumour glucose metabolism changes were evaluated using static (SUVmax, SUVmean and SULpeak) and dynamic (glucose metabolic rate and transport constant rates, k) parameters computed from the 18F-FDG PET/CT data. Results Artificial nutrition (median energy intake of 21.83 kcal/kg/day [13.16–45.90], protein intake of 0.84 g/kg/day [0.56–1.64]) was administered. Eight patients (80%) received enteral nutrition and two patients (20%) parenteral support. Comparison of 18F-FDG PET/CT parameters did not highlight any significant difference in tumour glucose metabolism before and after the period of nutrition support. Conclusions In cachexic patients with head and neck or oesophageal cancer, nutrition support administered according to the current guidelines shows no impact on tumour glucose metabolism, assessed by 18F-FDG PET/CT.

Resume Le cancer de l’endometre est le cancer gynecologique le plus frequent en France avec une incidence attendue en augmentation principalement en raison de l’augmentation du taux d’obesite. L’imagerie par resonance magnetique est essentielle pour stratifier la patiente en fonction de son risque de recidive et pour guider la prise en charge chirurgicale. L’association de sequences morphologiques et fonctionnelles fournit une approche complementaire permettant l’evaluation precise du degre d’invasion myometriale et cervicale, de l’extension extra-uterine et du statut ganglionnaire.

International audience; PURPOSE:The "PRAVACUR" phase 2 trial (NCT01268202) assessed the efficacy of pravastatin as an antifibrotic agent in patients with established cutaneous and subcutaneous radiation-induced fibrosis (RIF) after head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) radiation therapy and/or radiochemotherapy.METHODS AND MATERIALS:The main inclusion criteria were: NSCC in remission, grade ≥2 cutaneous and subcutaneous neck RIF (National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events, version 4.0), and no current treatment with statins or fibrates. Patients received pravastatin 40 mg/d for 12 months. The primary endpoint was reduction of RIF thickness by more than 30% at 12 months, as measured by cutaneous high-frequency ultrasonography. Secondary endpoints included RIF severity reduction, pravastatin tolerance, and quality of life.RESULTS:Sixty patients with grade 2 (n = 37), grade 3 (n = 22), or grade 4 (n = 1) RIF were enrolled from February 2011 to April 2016. The mean interval between RIF diagnosis and pravastatin initiation was 17.1 months. Pravastatin was stopped before 11 months of treatment in 18 patients (because of grade ≥2 adverse events related to pravastatin in 8 patients [13%]). In the 40 patients in whom pravastatin efficacy was assessed by high-frequency ultrasonography at baseline and at 12 months of treatment, a reduction of RIF thickness ≥30% was observed in 15 of 42 patients (35.7%; 95% confidence interval, 21.6%-52.0%). At the 12-month clinical evaluation, RIF severity was decreased in 50% of patients (n = 21; 95% confidence interval, 34.2%-65.8%), and the patients' self-perception, mood state, and social functioning were significantly improved. Pravastatin was well tolerated, with a very low occurrence of grade 3 toxicities (myalgia, n = 1) and grade 2 toxicities (myalgia/arthralgia or esophagitis, n = 3).CONCLUSIONS:This phase 2 prospective study supports the notion of radioinduced fibrosis reversibility. It showed that pravastatin (40 mg/d for 12 months) is an efficient antifibrotic agent in patients with grade ≥2 cutaneous and subcutaneous fibrosis after HNSCC radiation therapy.

International audience; Masses in the female pelvis can present a diagnostic challenge, but a systematic anatomy-based approach to MR image interpretation can help one navigate the spaces of the female pelvis and commonly encountered lesions in those spaces with greater confidence.Pelvic masses can present a diagnostic challenge owing to the difficulty in assessing their origin and the overlap in imaging features. The majority of pelvic tumors arise from gastrointestinal or genitourinary organs, with less common sites of origin including the connective tissues, nerves, and lymphovascular structures. Lesion evaluation usually starts with clinical assessment followed by imaging, or the lesion may be an incidental finding at imaging performed for other clinical indications. Since accurate diagnosis is essential for optimal management, imaging is useful for suggesting the correct diagnosis or narrowing the differential possibilities and distinguishing tumors from their mimics. Some masses may require histologic confirmation of the diagnosis with biopsy and/or up-front surgical resection. In this case, imaging is essential for presurgical planning to assess mass size and location, evaluate the relationship to adjacent pelvic structures, and narrow differential possibilities. Pelvic US is often the first imaging modality performed in women with pelvic symptoms. While US is often useful to detect a pelvic mass, it has significant limitations in assessing masses located deep in the pelvis or near gas-filled organs. CT also has limited value in the pelvis owing to its inferior soft-tissue contrast. MRI is frequently the optimal imaging modality, as it offers both multiplanar capability and excellent soft-tissue contrast. This article highlights the normal anatomy of the pelvic spaces in the female pelvis and focuses on MRI features of common tumors and tumor mimics that arise in these spaces. It provides an interpretative algorithm for approaching an unknown pelvic lesion at MRI. It also discusses surgical management, emphasizing the value of MRI as a road map to surgery and highlighting anatomic locations where surgical resection may present a challenge.

Background True giant splenic artery aneurysms (GSAAs) >5 cm are rare and present unique therapeutic challenges. The aim of this study was to evaluate the anatomic and clinical characteristics of these lesions and the current surgical and endovascular techniques available for their treatment. Methods A systematic review of the literature from 2004 to 2018 and the personal experience of the authors with management of GSAAs are presented. A total of 92 GSAA cases were reviewed. Analyses were performed on anatomic and clinical features and management modalities and outcomes of GSAA, including reintervention, morbidity, and mortality. Results GSAA presented at a mean age of 56.1 ± 17.3 years, with no sex predilection; 73% were symptomatic at presentation. Abdominal pain was the presenting symptom in >50% of cases; 34% percent were ruptured, with an overall mortality rate of 12.5%. This group often presented with gastrointestinal bleeding or hemodynamic collapse. The aneurysms were almost evenly distributed across the splenic artery and were not uncommonly associated with arteriovenous fistula formation (8.7%). There were 88 patients who had surgical (53.4%), endovascular (44.3%), or combination (2.3%) therapy. The most commonly performed procedure was aneurysmectomy and splenectomy with or without additional resection. Overall, surgical treatment had a lower morbidity (P = .041) than endovascular therapy and comparable reintervention and mortality rates. Conclusions GSAAs are uncommon vascular lesions, with distinct clinical features and aneurysm characteristics. Considering their high risk of rupture, timely diagnosis and management are essential to attain a satisfactory outcome. Surgery remains the standard treatment of these lesions. Endovascular intervention is a viable alternative in high-risk patients, particularly those with lesions

BackgroundRectal cancer surgery is technically challenging and depends on many factors. This study evaluated the ability of clinical and anatomical factors to predict surgical difficulty in total mesorectal excision.MethodsConsecutive patients who underwent total mesorectal excision for locally advanced rectal cancer in a laparoscopic, robotic or open procedure after neoadjuvant treatment, between 2005 and 2014, were included in this retrospective study. Preoperative clinical and MRI data were studied to develop a surgical difficulty grade.ResultsIn total, 164 patients with a median age of 61 (range 26–86) years were considered to be at low risk (143, 87·2 per cent) or high risk (21, 12·8 per cent) of surgical difficulty. In multivariable analysis, BMI at least 30 kg/m2 (P = 0·021), coloanal anastomosis (versus colorectal) (P = 0·034), intertuberous distance less than 10·1 cm (P = 0·041) and mesorectal fat area exceeding 20·7 cm2 (P = 0·051) were associated with greater surgical difficulty. A four-item score (ranging from 0 to 4), with each item (BMI, type of surgery, intertuberous distance and mesorectal fat area) scored 0 (absence) or 1 (presence), is proposed. Patients can be considered at high risk of a difficult or challenging operation if they have a score of 3 or more.ConclusionThis simple morphometric score may assist surgical decision-making and comparative study by defining operative difficulty before surgery.

Aim To evaluate the different techniques used for liver metastases Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) planning. We especially focused on immobilization devices, motion management and imaging used for contouring. Background Although some guidelines exist, there is no consensus regarding the minimal requirements for liver SBRT treatments. Materials and methods We reviewed the main liver metastases SBRT publications and guidelines; and compared the techniques used for immobilization, motion management, margins and imaging. Results There is a wide variety of techniques used for immobilization, motion management and planning imaging. Conclusions We provide a subjective critical analysis of minimal requirements and ideal technique for liver SBRT planning.

International audience; Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) has developed over the last few years for the treatment of primary and metastatic hepatic tumors. The tumoral and adjacent peritumoral modifications caused by this radiosurgery limit the evaluation of response by anatomic imaging and dimensional criteria alone, such as with RECIST. This suggests that it is of interest to also take into account the residual enhancement and hyper metabolism of these hepatic targets. We have reviewed the English language literature regarding the response of hepatic lesions treated by SBRT, and found that only seven articles were specifically concerned with this problem. The response of the hepatocellular carcinoma after SBRT has been studied specifically with multiphase enhanced CT-scan. Criteria set by the European Association of Study of the Liver better estimate response at each time point of follow up than RECIST does. Non-enhancement, reflecting tumor necrosis, is additionally an early indicator of response with extended response in time and a best non-enhancement percentage is observed at 12 months. The response after treatment by SBRT of cholangiocarcinoma has not yet generated a specific report. Use of RECIST criteria is also inadequate in the evaluation of response after SBRT for hepatic metastases. Response of liver metastases to SBRT is better assessed with a combination of size and enhancement pattern. The occurrence of a lobulated enhancement during follow up is efficient to predict local progression in a specific, reproducible, and sensitive way. Patients with FDG-avid hepatic metastases are also better evaluated with PET-CT and functional criteria than routine imaging and metric evaluation alone.

Study design This was a single center, retrospective observational study. Objective to investigate—in a cancer population—the prevalence and hallmarks of intravertebral enhancement (IVE) detected on contrast-enhanced CT. Summary of background data Intravertebral enhancements secondary to iodinated contrast stagnation have been described. Cancer patients have an increased risk of perivertebral venous thrombosis or stenosis secondary to several risk factors (cancer or drug induced hypercoagulability, deterioration of venous flow linked to catheter insertion, prolonged immobilization). In case of a high density lesion identified on CT, the diagnostic choice between metastasis and contrast media within bone marrow vessels may be an issue, especially as oncologic follow-up CT scans are usually performed with contrast medium injection. Methods 2572 contrast-enhanced body CT scans performed in cancer patients over 3 months in the medical imaging department of a university hospital were retrospectively reviewed. IVE was sought when paravertebral venous collateral circulation was detected and bone metastasis ruled out and classified as linear or nodular. Their locations within vertebra, their relation to the injection side and the predominant collateral venous network side were evaluated. Results Sixty-seven (2.8%) patients had a collateral paravertebral venous system and among them 21 had IVE (37%). There were 208 IVE locations involving 75 vertebrae. 199 IVE were linear-shaped (95.7%) and 9 nodular-shaped (4.3%). 80.8% were located between C6 and T4. 88.9% were localized in the vertebral body. 73.1% were located medially or ipsilateral to the injection side. Conclusion Intravertebral enhancement is found in 37% of the patients with paraspinal collateral venous circulation when a CT scan is performed for cancer. The ipsilateral or medial position of the IVE relative to the injection side and the side of the dominant perivertebral venous system, and the possibility of connecting the IVE to a paravertebral vein may be in favor of vascular opacification.

e15149Background: Radiotherapy (RT) can prime an anti-tumor immune response. Unfortunately, this response is not sufficient to allow tumor destruction and abscopal effect (effect on a distant untre...

Objective Metastases to the spine are a common manifestation of breast cancer leading to considerable reduction in the patient's quality of life. Physicians must consider the different treatments available to decrease pain, reduce tumor burden, and ensure spinal stability to prevent neurological compromises. The first objective of this study is to analyze the epidemiology and outcomes of patients with spinal metastases from breast cancer and describe changes over time in these lesions. The second objective is to establish the current treatment of spinal metastases in this type of cancer. Methods A total of 140 patients with breast cancer and spinal metastasis involvement were studied retrospectively. Demographic, clinical, and radiologic parameters were assessed, and the effects of systemic and local treatments on spinal metastasis were analyzed. Results Median patient age at diagnosis of breast cancer was 50 years (19–86 years) and average follow-up was 100 months (4–384 months). Median overall survival after diagnosis of spinal metastasis was 18.6 months. Fractures were present in 24 patients (19.3%) at diagnosis and in up to 60 cases (48.6%) by the end of the study period. Conclusions The survival rate was better in patients with spinal metastases who received specific treatment. The evolution from lytic spinal metastasis to mixed and blastic subtypes is observed with adjunctive therapy for spinal metastases (bisphosphonates, radiotherapy). Increased attention must be given for high-grade breast cancer, as spinal metastases declare faster for these stages. This study provides evidence that a multidisciplinary tumor board specifically focusing on bone metastasis is essential to effectively manage patients with breast cancer and spinal metastasis.