Search

Your search keyword '"Rathkopf, D."' showing total 188 results
Start Over Author "Rathkopf, D."
188 results on '"Rathkopf, D."'

1. Naming disease states for clinical utility in prostate cancer: a rose by any other name might not smell as sweet

Author

Armstrong, AJ, Antonarakis, ES, Taplin, M-E, Kelly, WK, Beltran, H, Fizazi, K, Dahut, WL, Shore, N, Slovin, S, George, D, Carducci, MA, Corn, P, Danila, D, Dreicer, R, Heath, E, Rathkopf, D, Liu, G, Nanus, D, Stein, M, Smith, MR, Sternberg, C, Wilding, G, Nelson, PS, Halabi, S, Kantoff, P, Clarke, NW, Evans, CP, Heidenreich, A, Mottet, N, Gleave, M, Morris, MJ, and Scher, HI

Subjects
Good Health and Well Being, Humans, Male, Prostatic Neoplasms, Castration-Resistant, Terminology as Topic, Oncology and Carcinogenesis, Oncology & Carcinogenesis
Published
2018

2. First-In-Human Phase I Study Of A Dual mTOR Kinase And DNA-PK Inhibitor (CC-115) In Advanced Malignancy

Author

Munster P, Mita M, Mahipal A, Nemunaitis J, Massard C, Mikkelsen T, Cruz C, Paz-Ares L, Hidalgo M, Rathkopf D, Blumenschein Jr G, Smith DC, Eichhorst B, Cloughesy T, Filvaroff EH, Li S, Raymon H, de Haan H, Hege K, and Bendell JC

Subjects
cc-115, mtorc1/mtorc2, mtor inhibitor, dna-pk inhibitor, phase i study, Neoplasms. Tumors. Oncology. Including cancer and carcinogens, RC254-282
Abstract

Pamela Munster,1 Monica Mita,2 Amit Mahipal,3 John Nemunaitis,4 Christophe Massard,5 Tom Mikkelsen,6 Cristina Cruz,7 Luis Paz-Ares,8 Manuel Hidalgo,9 Dana Rathkopf,10 George Blumenschein Jr,11 David C Smith,12 Barbara Eichhorst,13 Tim Cloughesy,14 Ellen H Filvaroff,15 Shaoyi Li,16 Heather Raymon,17 Hans de Haan,15 Kristen Hege,15 Johanna C Bendell18 1UCSF Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, San Francisco, CA, USA; 2Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Internal Medicine Medical Oncology Department, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 3Mayo Clinic, Medical Oncology Department, Rochester, MN, USA; 4University of Toledo College of Medicine and Life Sciences, Hematology/Oncology Department, Toledo, OH, USA; 5Institut Gustave Roussy, Drug Development Department, Paris, France; 6Henry Ford Health System, Neurology Department, Detroit, MI, USA; 7Vall d’Hebron University Hospital, Medical Oncology Department, Barcelona, Spain; 8University Hospital 12 de Octubre, CNIO, Universidad Complutense & Ciberonc, Medical Oncology Department, Madrid, Spain; 9Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Oncology Department, Madrid, Spain; 10Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, Department of Medicine, New York, NY, USA; 11The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Department of Thoracic/Head and Neck Medical Oncology, Houston, TX, USA; 12University of Michigan, Urology Oncology, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; 13University Hospital of Cologne, Department I for Internal Medicine, Cologne, Germany; 14David Geffen School of Medicine, Neurology Department, UCLA, Los Angeles, CA, USA; 15Celgene Corporation, Translational Development Department, San Francisco, CA, USA; 16Celgene Corporation, Department of Statistics, Summit, NJ, USA; 17Celgene Corporation, Department of Pharmacology, San Diego, CA, USA; 18Sarah Cannon Research Institute, Drug Development Unit, Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, TN, USACorrespondence: Johanna C BendellSarah Cannon Research Institute, Drug Development Unit, Tennessee Oncology, 250 25th Ave North, Suite 110, Nashville, TN 37203, USATel +1 615 329 7274Email jbendell@tnonc.comPurpose: This first-in-human Phase I study investigated the safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), pharmacodynamic profile, and preliminary efficacy of CC-115, a dual inhibitor of mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) kinase and DNA-dependent protein kinase.Patients and Methods: Patients with advanced solid or hematologic malignancies were enrolled in dose-finding and cohort expansion phases. In dose-finding, once-daily or twice-daily (BID) ascending oral doses of CC-115 (range: 0.5–40 mg/day) in 28-day continuous cycles identified the maximum-tolerated dose for cohort expansion in 5 specified tumor types. Twelve additional patients with mixed solid tumors participated in a bioavailability substudy.Results: Forty-four patients were enrolled in the dose-finding cohort. Dose-limiting toxicity included thrombocytopenia, stomatitis, hyperglycemia, asthenia/fatigue, and increased transaminases. CC-115 10 mg BID was selected for cohort expansion (n=74) in which fatigue, nausea, and decreased appetite were the most frequent toxicities. Dose-proportional PK was found. CC-115 distributed to glioblastoma tissue (mean tumor/plasma concentration ratio: 0.713). Total exposure of CC-115 was similar under fasting and fed conditions. A patient with endometrial carcinoma remained in complete remission >4 years. Partial response (PR; n=2) and stable disease (SD; n=4) were reported in the bioavailability substudy; SD was reached in 53%, 22%, 21%, and 64% of patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, Ewing sarcoma, glioblastoma multiforme, and castration-resistant prostate cancer, respectively. Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma showed 38% PR and 25% SD.Conclusion: CC-115 was well-tolerated, with toxicities consistent with mTOR inhibitors. Together with biomarker inhibition and preliminary efficacy, oral CC-115 10 mg BID is a promising novel anticancer treatment.Clinical trial registration: NCT01353625.Keywords: CC-115, mTORC1/mTORC2, mTOR inhibitor, DNA-PK inhibitor, Phase I study

Published
2019

3. FORMULA-509: A Multicenter Randomized Trial of Post-Operative Salvage Radiotherapy (SRT) and 6 Months of GnRH Agonist with Either Bicalutamide or Abiraterone Acetate/Prednisone (AAP) and Apalutamide (Apa) Post-Radical Prostatectomy (RP)

Author

Nguyen, P.L., primary, Kollmeier, M.A., additional, Rathkopf, D., additional, Hoffman, K.E., additional, Zurita-Saavedra, A., additional, Spratt, D.E., additional, Dess, R.T., additional, Liauw, S., additional, Szmulewitz, R., additional, Einstein, D.J., additional, Bubley, G., additional, Yu, J.B., additional, An, Y., additional, Wong, A.C., additional, Feng, F.Y., additional, Mckay, R.R., additional, Rose, B.S., additional, Shin, K.Y., additional, Kibel, A., additional, and Taplin, M.E.A., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

4. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer—metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer: report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2022

Author

Gillessen, S. Bossi, A. Davis, I.D. de Bono, J. Fizazi, K. James, N.D. Mottet, N. Shore, N. Small, E. Smith, M. Sweeney, C.J. Tombal, B. Antonarakis, E.S. Aparicio, A.M. Armstrong, A.J. Attard, G. Beer, T.M. Beltran, H. Bjartell, A. Blanchard, P. Briganti, A. Bristow, R.G. Bulbul, M. Caffo, O. Castellano, D. Castro, E. Cheng, H.H. Chi, K.N. Chowdhury, S. Clarke, C.S. Clarke, N. Daugaard, G. De Santis, M. Duran, I. Eeles, R. Efstathiou, E. Efstathiou, J. Ekeke, O.N. Evans, C.P. Fanti, S. Feng, F.Y. Fonteyne, V. Fossati, N. Frydenberg, M. George, D. Gleave, M. Gravis, G. Halabi, S. Heinrich, D. Herrmann, K. Higano, C. Hofman, M.S. Horvath, L.G. Hussain, M. Jereczek-Fossa, B.A. Jones, R. Kanesvaran, R. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P.-L. Khauli, R.B. Klotz, L. Kramer, G. Leibowitz, R. Logothetis, C. Mahal, B. Maluf, F. Mateo, J. Matheson, D. Mehra, N. Merseburger, A. Morgans, A.K. Morris, M.J. Mrabti, H. Mukherji, D. Murphy, D.G. Murthy, V. Nguyen, P.L. Oh, W.K. Ost, P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Padhani, A.R. Pezaro, C.J. Poon, D.M.C. Pritchard, C.C. Rabah, D.M. Rathkopf, D. Reiter, R.E. Rubin, M.A. Ryan, C.J. Saad, F. Sade, J.P. Sartor, O. Scher, H.I. Sharifi, N. Skoneczna, I. Soule, H. Spratt, D.E. Srinivas, S. Sternberg, C.N. Steuber, T. Suzuki, H. Sydes, M.R. Taplin, M.-E. Tilki, D. Türkeri, L. Turco, F. Uemura, H. Uemura, H. Ürün, Y. Vale, C.L. van Oort, I. Vapiwala, N. Walz, J. Yamoah, K. Ye, D. Yu, E.Y. Zapatero, A. Zilli, T. Omlin, A. and Gillessen, S. Bossi, A. Davis, I.D. de Bono, J. Fizazi, K. James, N.D. Mottet, N. Shore, N. Small, E. Smith, M. Sweeney, C.J. Tombal, B. Antonarakis, E.S. Aparicio, A.M. Armstrong, A.J. Attard, G. Beer, T.M. Beltran, H. Bjartell, A. Blanchard, P. Briganti, A. Bristow, R.G. Bulbul, M. Caffo, O. Castellano, D. Castro, E. Cheng, H.H. Chi, K.N. Chowdhury, S. Clarke, C.S. Clarke, N. Daugaard, G. De Santis, M. Duran, I. Eeles, R. Efstathiou, E. Efstathiou, J. Ekeke, O.N. Evans, C.P. Fanti, S. Feng, F.Y. Fonteyne, V. Fossati, N. Frydenberg, M. George, D. Gleave, M. Gravis, G. Halabi, S. Heinrich, D. Herrmann, K. Higano, C. Hofman, M.S. Horvath, L.G. Hussain, M. Jereczek-Fossa, B.A. Jones, R. Kanesvaran, R. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P.-L. Khauli, R.B. Klotz, L. Kramer, G. Leibowitz, R. Logothetis, C. Mahal, B. Maluf, F. Mateo, J. Matheson, D. Mehra, N. Merseburger, A. Morgans, A.K. Morris, M.J. Mrabti, H. Mukherji, D. Murphy, D.G. Murthy, V. Nguyen, P.L. Oh, W.K. Ost, P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Padhani, A.R. Pezaro, C.J. Poon, D.M.C. Pritchard, C.C. Rabah, D.M. Rathkopf, D. Reiter, R.E. Rubin, M.A. Ryan, C.J. Saad, F. Sade, J.P. Sartor, O. Scher, H.I. Sharifi, N. Skoneczna, I. Soule, H. Spratt, D.E. Srinivas, S. Sternberg, C.N. Steuber, T. Suzuki, H. Sydes, M.R. Taplin, M.-E. Tilki, D. Türkeri, L. Turco, F. Uemura, H. Uemura, H. Ürün, Y. Vale, C.L. van Oort, I. Vapiwala, N. Walz, J. Yamoah, K. Ye, D. Yu, E.Y. Zapatero, A. Zilli, T. Omlin, A.

Abstract

Background: Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation together with novel treatment options have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. However, we still lack high-level evidence in many areas relevant to making management decisions in daily clinical practise. The 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) addressed some questions in these areas to supplement guidelines that mostly are based on level 1 evidence. Objective: To present the voting results of the APCCC 2022. Design, setting, and participants: The experts voted on controversial questions where high-level evidence is mostly lacking: locally advanced prostate cancer; biochemical recurrence after local treatment; metastatic hormone-sensitive, non-metastatic, and metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; oligometastatic prostate cancer; and managing side effects of hormonal therapy. A panel of 105 international prostate cancer experts voted on the consensus questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted on 198 pre-defined questions, which were developed by 117 voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. A total of 116 questions on metastatic and/or castration-resistant prostate cancer are discussed in this manuscript. In 2022, the voting was done by a web-based survey because of COVID-19 restrictions. Results and limitations: The voting reflects the expert opinion of these panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results are reported in the supplementary material. We report here on topics in metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), non-metastatic, castration-resistant prostate cancer (nmCRPC), metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC), and oligometastatic an

Published
2023

5. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022

Author

Gillessen, S. Bossi, A. Davis, I.D. de Bono, J. Fizazi, K. James, N.D. Mottet, N. Shore, N. Small, E. Smith, M. Sweeney, C. Tombal, B. Antonarakis, E.S. Aparicio, A.M. Armstrong, A.J. Attard, G. Beer, T.M. Beltran, H. Bjartell, A. Blanchard, P. Briganti, A. Bristow, R.G. Bulbul, M. Caffo, O. Castellano, D. Castro, E. Cheng, H.H. Chi, K.N. Chowdhury, S. Clarke, C.S. Clarke, N. Daugaard, G. De Santis, M. Duran, I. Eeles, R. Efstathiou, E. Efstathiou, J. Ngozi Ekeke, O. Evans, C.P. Fanti, S. Feng, F.Y. Fonteyne, V. Fossati, N. Frydenberg, M. George, D. Gleave, M. Gravis, G. Halabi, S. Heinrich, D. Herrmann, K. Higano, C. Hofman, M.S. Horvath, L.G. Hussain, M. Jereczek-Fossa, B.A. Jones, R. Kanesvaran, R. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P.-L. Khauli, R.B. Klotz, L. Kramer, G. Leibowitz, R. Logothetis, C.J. Mahal, B.A. Maluf, F. Mateo, J. Matheson, D. Mehra, N. Merseburger, A. Morgans, A.K. Morris, M.J. Mrabti, H. Mukherji, D. Murphy, D.G. Murthy, V. Nguyen, P.L. Oh, W.K. Ost, P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Padhani, A.R. Pezaro, C. Poon, D.M.C. Pritchard, C.C. Rabah, D.M. Rathkopf, D. Reiter, R.E. Rubin, M.A. Ryan, C.J. Saad, F. Pablo Sade, J. Sartor, O.A. Scher, H.I. Sharifi, N. Skoneczna, I. Soule, H. Spratt, D.E. Srinivas, S. Sternberg, C.N. Steuber, T. Suzuki, H. Sydes, M.R. Taplin, M.-E. Tilki, D. Türkeri, L. Turco, F. Uemura, H. Uemura, H. Ürün, Y. Vale, C.L. van Oort, I. Vapiwala, N. Walz, J. Yamoah, K. Ye, D. Yu, E.Y. Zapatero, A. Zilli, T. Omlin, A. and Gillessen, S. Bossi, A. Davis, I.D. de Bono, J. Fizazi, K. James, N.D. Mottet, N. Shore, N. Small, E. Smith, M. Sweeney, C. Tombal, B. Antonarakis, E.S. Aparicio, A.M. Armstrong, A.J. Attard, G. Beer, T.M. Beltran, H. Bjartell, A. Blanchard, P. Briganti, A. Bristow, R.G. Bulbul, M. Caffo, O. Castellano, D. Castro, E. Cheng, H.H. Chi, K.N. Chowdhury, S. Clarke, C.S. Clarke, N. Daugaard, G. De Santis, M. Duran, I. Eeles, R. Efstathiou, E. Efstathiou, J. Ngozi Ekeke, O. Evans, C.P. Fanti, S. Feng, F.Y. Fonteyne, V. Fossati, N. Frydenberg, M. George, D. Gleave, M. Gravis, G. Halabi, S. Heinrich, D. Herrmann, K. Higano, C. Hofman, M.S. Horvath, L.G. Hussain, M. Jereczek-Fossa, B.A. Jones, R. Kanesvaran, R. Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P.-L. Khauli, R.B. Klotz, L. Kramer, G. Leibowitz, R. Logothetis, C.J. Mahal, B.A. Maluf, F. Mateo, J. Matheson, D. Mehra, N. Merseburger, A. Morgans, A.K. Morris, M.J. Mrabti, H. Mukherji, D. Murphy, D.G. Murthy, V. Nguyen, P.L. Oh, W.K. Ost, P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Padhani, A.R. Pezaro, C. Poon, D.M.C. Pritchard, C.C. Rabah, D.M. Rathkopf, D. Reiter, R.E. Rubin, M.A. Ryan, C.J. Saad, F. Pablo Sade, J. Sartor, O.A. Scher, H.I. Sharifi, N. Skoneczna, I. Soule, H. Spratt, D.E. Srinivas, S. Sternberg, C.N. Steuber, T. Suzuki, H. Sydes, M.R. Taplin, M.-E. Tilki, D. Türkeri, L. Turco, F. Uemura, H. Uemura, H. Ürün, Y. Vale, C.L. van Oort, I. Vapiwala, N. Walz, J. Yamoah, K. Ye, D. Yu, E.Y. Zapatero, A. Zilli, T. Omlin, A.

Abstract

Background: Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. Objective: To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. Design, setting, and participants: Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members (“panellists”) who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1–3. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. Results and limitations: The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. Conclusions: These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical manage

Published
2023

6. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer. Part I: Intermediate-/High-risk and Locally Advanced Disease, Biochemical Relapse, and Side Effects of Hormonal Treatment: Report of the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2022

Author

Gillessen, S., Bossi, A., Davis, I.D., Bono, J. de, Fizazi, K., James, N.D., Mottet, N., Shore, N., Small, E., Smith, M., Sweeney, C., Tombal, B., Antonarakis, E.S., Aparicio, A.M., Armstrong, A.J., Attard, G., Beer, T.M., Beltran, H., Bjartell, A., Blanchard, P., Briganti, A., Bristow, R.G., Bulbul, M., Caffo, O., Castellano, D., Castro, E., Cheng, H.H., Chi, K.N., Chowdhury, S., Clarke, C.S., Clarke, N., Daugaard, G., Santis, M. de, Duran, I., Eeles, R., Efstathiou, E., Efstathiou, J., Ekeke, O. Ngozi, Evans, C.P., Fanti, S., Feng, F.Y., Fonteyne, V., Fossati, N., Frydenberg, M., George, D., Gleave, M., Gravis, G., Halabi, S., Heinrich, D., Herrmann, K., Higano, C., Hofman, M.S., Horvath, L.G., Hussain, M., Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara A., Jones, R., Kanesvaran, R., Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P.L., Khauli, R.B., Klotz, L., Kramer, G., Leibowitz, R., Logothetis, C.J., Mahal, B.A., Maluf, F. Cotait, Mateo, J., Matheson, D., Mehra, N., Merseburger, A., Morgans, A.K., Morris, M.J., Mrabti, H., Mukherji, D., Murphy, D.G.M., Murthy, V., Nguyen, P.L., Oh, W.K., Ost, P., O'Sullivan, J.M., Padhani, A.R., Pezaro, C., Poon, D.M.C., Pritchard, C.C., Rabah, D.M., Rathkopf, D., Reiter, R.E., Rubin, M.A., Ryan, C.J., Saad, F., Sade, J. Pablo, Sartor, O.A., Scher, H.I., Sharifi, N., Skoneczna, I., Soule, H., Spratt, D.E., Srinivas, S., Sternberg, C.N., Steuber, T., Oort, I.M. van, Zilli, T., Omlin, A., Gillessen, S., Bossi, A., Davis, I.D., Bono, J. de, Fizazi, K., James, N.D., Mottet, N., Shore, N., Small, E., Smith, M., Sweeney, C., Tombal, B., Antonarakis, E.S., Aparicio, A.M., Armstrong, A.J., Attard, G., Beer, T.M., Beltran, H., Bjartell, A., Blanchard, P., Briganti, A., Bristow, R.G., Bulbul, M., Caffo, O., Castellano, D., Castro, E., Cheng, H.H., Chi, K.N., Chowdhury, S., Clarke, C.S., Clarke, N., Daugaard, G., Santis, M. de, Duran, I., Eeles, R., Efstathiou, E., Efstathiou, J., Ekeke, O. Ngozi, Evans, C.P., Fanti, S., Feng, F.Y., Fonteyne, V., Fossati, N., Frydenberg, M., George, D., Gleave, M., Gravis, G., Halabi, S., Heinrich, D., Herrmann, K., Higano, C., Hofman, M.S., Horvath, L.G., Hussain, M., Jereczek-Fossa, Barbara A., Jones, R., Kanesvaran, R., Kellokumpu-Lehtinen, P.L., Khauli, R.B., Klotz, L., Kramer, G., Leibowitz, R., Logothetis, C.J., Mahal, B.A., Maluf, F. Cotait, Mateo, J., Matheson, D., Mehra, N., Merseburger, A., Morgans, A.K., Morris, M.J., Mrabti, H., Mukherji, D., Murphy, D.G.M., Murthy, V., Nguyen, P.L., Oh, W.K., Ost, P., O'Sullivan, J.M., Padhani, A.R., Pezaro, C., Poon, D.M.C., Pritchard, C.C., Rabah, D.M., Rathkopf, D., Reiter, R.E., Rubin, M.A., Ryan, C.J., Saad, F., Sade, J. Pablo, Sartor, O.A., Scher, H.I., Sharifi, N., Skoneczna, I., Soule, H., Spratt, D.E., Srinivas, S., Sternberg, C.N., Steuber, T., Oort, I.M. van, Zilli, T., and Omlin, A.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Innovations in imaging and molecular characterisation and the evolution of new therapies have improved outcomes in advanced prostate cancer. Nonetheless, we continue to lack high-level evidence on a variety of clinical topics that greatly impact daily practice. To supplement evidence-based guidelines, the 2022 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC 2022) surveyed experts about key dilemmas in clinical management. OBJECTIVE: To present consensus voting results for select questions from APCCC 2022. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: Before the conference, a panel of 117 international prostate cancer experts used a modified Delphi process to develop 198 multiple-choice consensus questions on (1) intermediate- and high-risk and locally advanced prostate cancer, (2) biochemical recurrence after local treatment, (3) side effects from hormonal therapies, (4) metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer, (5) nonmetastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, (6) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer, and (7) oligometastatic and oligoprogressive prostate cancer. Before the conference, these questions were administered via a web-based survey to the 105 physician panel members ("panellists") who directly engage in prostate cancer treatment decision-making. Herein, we present results for the 82 questions on topics 1-3. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: Consensus was defined as ≥75% agreement, with strong consensus defined as ≥90% agreement. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The voting results reveal varying degrees of consensus, as is discussed in this article and shown in the detailed results in the Supplementary material. The findings reflect the opinions of an international panel of experts and did not incorporate a formal literature review and meta-analysis. CONCLUSIONS: These voting results by a panel of international experts in advanced prostate cancer can help physicians and patients navigate controversial areas of clinical manage

Published
2023

7. 1406P Interim results of a phase II trial of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients (Pts) with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing on androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI)

Author

Lang, J., primary, Tagawa, S.T., additional, Slovin, S., additional, Emamekhoo, H., additional, Rathkopf, D., additional, Abida, W., additional, Autio, K., additional, Xiao, H., additional, Molina, A.M., additional, Eickhoff, J., additional, Sperger, J.M., additional, Dehm, S., additional, Nanus, D.M., additional, and Kyriakopoulos, C.E., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

9. 1648P Final clinical and liquid biopsy (LBx) results of phase II trial of sacituzumab govitecan (SG) in patients (Pts) with metastatic castration resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) progressing on androgen receptor signaling inhibitors (ARSI)

Author

Lang, J.M., Tagawa, S.T., Slovin, S., Sperger, J.M., Schehr, J.L., Stahlfeld, C., Hintz, A.M., Emamekhoo, H., Rathkopf, D., Abida, W., Autio, K., Xiao, H., Mitchell, A., Molina, A.M., Zhao, S.G., Eickhoff, J., Dehm, S., Nanus, D.M., and Kyriakopoulos, C.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

10. 1597MO Clinical activity of BMS-986365 (CC-94676), a dual androgen receptor (AR) ligand-directed degrader and antagonist, in heavily pretreated patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)

Author

Rathkopf, D., Patel, M.R., Choudhury, A.D., Rasco, D., Lakhani, N.J., Hawley, J., Srinivas, S., Aparicio, A., Narayan, V., Runcie, K., Emamekhoo, H., Reichert, Z., Nguyen, H., Wells, A., Kandimalla, R., Suryawanshi, S., Wu, J., Arora, V., Pourdehnad, M., and Armstrong, A.J.

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021

Author

Gillessen, S. Armstrong, A. Attard, G. Beer, T.M. Beltran, H. Bjartell, A. Bossi, A. Briganti, A. Bristow, R.G. Bulbul, M. Caffo, O. Chi, K.N. Clarke, C.S. Clarke, N. Davis, I.D. de Bono, J.S. Duran, I. Eeles, R. Efstathiou, E. Efstathiou, J. Ekeke, O.N. Evans, C.P. Fanti, S. Feng, F.Y. Fizazi, K. Frydenberg, M. George, D. Gleave, M. Halabi, S. Heinrich, D. Higano, C. Hofman, M.S. Hussain, M. James, N. Jones, R. Kanesvaran, R. Khauli, R.B. Klotz, L. Leibowitz, R. Logothetis, C. Maluf, F. Millman, R. Morgans, A.K. Morris, M.J. Mottet, N. Mrabti, H. Murphy, D.G. Murthy, V. Oh, W.K. Ost, P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Padhani, A.R. Parker, C. Poon, D.M.C. Pritchard, C.C. Rabah, D.M. Rathkopf, D. Reiter, R.E. Rubin, M. Ryan, C.J. Saad, F. Sade, J.P. Sartor, O. Scher, H.I. Shore, N. Skoneczna, I. Small, E. Smith, M. Soule, H. Spratt, D.E. Sternberg, C.N. Suzuki, H. Sweeney, C. Sydes, M.R. Taplin, M.-E. Tilki, D. Tombal, B. Türkeri, L. Uemura, H. Uemura, H. van Oort, I. Yamoah, K. Ye, D. Zapatero, A. Omlin, A. and Gillessen, S. Armstrong, A. Attard, G. Beer, T.M. Beltran, H. Bjartell, A. Bossi, A. Briganti, A. Bristow, R.G. Bulbul, M. Caffo, O. Chi, K.N. Clarke, C.S. Clarke, N. Davis, I.D. de Bono, J.S. Duran, I. Eeles, R. Efstathiou, E. Efstathiou, J. Ekeke, O.N. Evans, C.P. Fanti, S. Feng, F.Y. Fizazi, K. Frydenberg, M. George, D. Gleave, M. Halabi, S. Heinrich, D. Higano, C. Hofman, M.S. Hussain, M. James, N. Jones, R. Kanesvaran, R. Khauli, R.B. Klotz, L. Leibowitz, R. Logothetis, C. Maluf, F. Millman, R. Morgans, A.K. Morris, M.J. Mottet, N. Mrabti, H. Murphy, D.G. Murthy, V. Oh, W.K. Ost, P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Padhani, A.R. Parker, C. Poon, D.M.C. Pritchard, C.C. Rabah, D.M. Rathkopf, D. Reiter, R.E. Rubin, M. Ryan, C.J. Saad, F. Sade, J.P. Sartor, O. Scher, H.I. Shore, N. Skoneczna, I. Small, E. Smith, M. Soule, H. Spratt, D.E. Sternberg, C.N. Suzuki, H. Sweeney, C. Sydes, M.R. Taplin, M.-E. Tilki, D. Tombal, B. Türkeri, L. Uemura, H. Uemura, H. van Oort, I. Yamoah, K. Ye, D. Zapatero, A. Omlin, A.

Abstract

Background: Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. Objective: To present the voting results from APCCC 2021. Design, setting, and participants: The experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. Results and limitations: The voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. Conclusions: These voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical eviden

Published
2022

14. Corrigendum to “What Experts Think About Prostate Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021” [Eur Urol 82(1):6–11] (European Urology (2022) 82(1) (6–11), (S0302283822016505), (10.1016/j.eururo.2022.02.010))

Author

Turco, F. Armstrong, A. Attard, G. Beer, T.M. Beltran, H. Bjartell, A. Bossi, A. Briganti, A. Bristow, R.G. Bulbul, M. Caffo, O. Chi, K.N. Clarke, C. Clarke, N. Davis, I.D. de Bono, J. Duran, I. Eeles, R. Efstathiou, E. Efstathiou, J. Evans, C.P. Fanti, S. Feng, F.Y. Fizazi, K. Frydenberg, M. George, D. Gleave, M. Halabi, S. Heinrich, D. Higano, C. Hofman, M.S. Hussain, M. James, N. Jones, R. Kanesvaran, R. Khauli, R.B. Klotz, L. Leibowitz, R. Logothetis, C. Maluf, F. Millman, R. Morgans, A.K. Morris, M.J. Mottet, N. Mrabti, H. Murphy, D.G. Murthy, V. Oh, W.K. Ekeke, O.N. Ost, P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Padhani, A.R. Parker, C. Poon, D.M.C. Pritchard, C.C. Rabah, D.M. Rathkopf, D. Reiter, R.E. Rubin, M. Ryan, C.J. Saad, F. Sade, J.P. Sartor, O. Scher, H.I. Shore, N. Skoneczna, I. Small, E. Smith, M. Soule, H. Spratt, D. Sternberg, C.N. Suzuki, H. Sweeney, C. Sydes, M. Taplin, M.-E. Tilki, D. Tombal, B. Türkeri, L. Uemura, H. Uemura, H. van Oort, I. Yamoah, K. Ye, D. Zapatero, A. Gillessen, S. Omlin, A. and Turco, F. Armstrong, A. Attard, G. Beer, T.M. Beltran, H. Bjartell, A. Bossi, A. Briganti, A. Bristow, R.G. Bulbul, M. Caffo, O. Chi, K.N. Clarke, C. Clarke, N. Davis, I.D. de Bono, J. Duran, I. Eeles, R. Efstathiou, E. Efstathiou, J. Evans, C.P. Fanti, S. Feng, F.Y. Fizazi, K. Frydenberg, M. George, D. Gleave, M. Halabi, S. Heinrich, D. Higano, C. Hofman, M.S. Hussain, M. James, N. Jones, R. Kanesvaran, R. Khauli, R.B. Klotz, L. Leibowitz, R. Logothetis, C. Maluf, F. Millman, R. Morgans, A.K. Morris, M.J. Mottet, N. Mrabti, H. Murphy, D.G. Murthy, V. Oh, W.K. Ekeke, O.N. Ost, P. O'Sullivan, J.M. Padhani, A.R. Parker, C. Poon, D.M.C. Pritchard, C.C. Rabah, D.M. Rathkopf, D. Reiter, R.E. Rubin, M. Ryan, C.J. Saad, F. Sade, J.P. Sartor, O. Scher, H.I. Shore, N. Skoneczna, I. Small, E. Smith, M. Soule, H. Spratt, D. Sternberg, C.N. Suzuki, H. Sweeney, C. Sydes, M. Taplin, M.-E. Tilki, D. Tombal, B. Türkeri, L. Uemura, H. Uemura, H. van Oort, I. Yamoah, K. Ye, D. Zapatero, A. Gillessen, S. Omlin, A.

Abstract

The authors regret that Axel Heidenreich was added to the author list in error. The author list is now corrected as above, however the affiliations of remaining authors have been retained. The authors would like to apologise for any inconvenience caused. © 2022 The Author(s)

Published
2022

15. What Experts Think About Prostate Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021

Author

Turco, F, Armstrong, A, Attard, G, Beer, TM, Beltran, H, Bjartell, A, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Bristow, RG, Bulbul, M, Caffo, O, Chi, KN, Clarke, C, Clarke, N, Davis, ID, de Bono, J, Duran, I, Eeles, R, Efstathiou, E, Efstathiou, J, Evans, CP, Fanti, S, Feng, FY, Fizazi, K, Frydenberg, M, George, D, Gleave, M, Halabi, S, Heinrich, D, Higano, C, Hofman, MS, Hussain, M, James, N, Jones, R, Kanesvaran, R, Khauli, RB, Klotz, L, Leibowitz, R, Logothetis, C, Maluf, F, Millman, R, Morgans, AK, Morris, MJ, Mottet, N, Mrabti, H, Murphy, DG, Murthy, V, Oh, WK, Onyeanunam, NE, Ost, P, O'Sullivan, JM, Padhani, AR, Parker, C, Poon, DMC, Pritchard, CC, Rabah, DM, Rathkopf, D, Reiter, RE, Rubin, M, Ryan, CJ, Saad, F, Pablo Sade, J, Sartor, O, Scher, H, Shore, N, Skoneczna, I, Small, E, Smith, M, Soule, H, Spratt, D, Sternberg, CN, Suzuki, H, Sweeney, C, Sydes, M, Taplin, M-E, Tilki, D, Tombal, B, Turkeri, L, Uemura, H, van Oort, I, Yamoah, K, Ye, D, Zapatero, A, Gillessen, S, Omlin, A, Turco, F, Armstrong, A, Attard, G, Beer, TM, Beltran, H, Bjartell, A, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Bristow, RG, Bulbul, M, Caffo, O, Chi, KN, Clarke, C, Clarke, N, Davis, ID, de Bono, J, Duran, I, Eeles, R, Efstathiou, E, Efstathiou, J, Evans, CP, Fanti, S, Feng, FY, Fizazi, K, Frydenberg, M, George, D, Gleave, M, Halabi, S, Heinrich, D, Higano, C, Hofman, MS, Hussain, M, James, N, Jones, R, Kanesvaran, R, Khauli, RB, Klotz, L, Leibowitz, R, Logothetis, C, Maluf, F, Millman, R, Morgans, AK, Morris, MJ, Mottet, N, Mrabti, H, Murphy, DG, Murthy, V, Oh, WK, Onyeanunam, NE, Ost, P, O'Sullivan, JM, Padhani, AR, Parker, C, Poon, DMC, Pritchard, CC, Rabah, DM, Rathkopf, D, Reiter, RE, Rubin, M, Ryan, CJ, Saad, F, Pablo Sade, J, Sartor, O, Scher, H, Shore, N, Skoneczna, I, Small, E, Smith, M, Soule, H, Spratt, D, Sternberg, CN, Suzuki, H, Sweeney, C, Sydes, M, Taplin, M-E, Tilki, D, Tombal, B, Turkeri, L, Uemura, H, van Oort, I, Yamoah, K, Ye, D, Zapatero, A, Gillessen, S, and Omlin, A

Abstract

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC) may be at greater risk for severe illness, hospitalisation, or death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to male gender, older age, potential immunosuppressive treatments, or comorbidities. Thus, the optimal management of APC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is complex. In October 2021, during the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2021, the 73 voting members of the panel members discussed and voted on 13 questions on this topic that could help clinicians make treatment choices during the pandemic. There was a consensus for full COVID-19 vaccination and booster injection in APC patients. Furthermore, the voting results indicate that the expert's treatment recommendations are influenced by the vaccination status: the COVID-19 pandemic altered management of APC patients for 70% of the panellists before the vaccination was available but only for 25% of panellists for fully vaccinated patients. Most experts (71%) were less likely to use docetaxel and abiraterone in unvaccinated patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. For fully vaccinated patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer, there was a consensus (77%) to follow the usual treatment schedule, whereas in unvaccinated patients, 55% of the panel members voted for deferring radiation therapy. Finally, there was a strong consensus for the use of telemedicine for monitoring APC patients. PATIENT SUMMARY: In the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021, the panellists reached a consensus regarding the recommendation of the COVID-19 vaccine in prostate cancer patients and use of telemedicine for monitoring these patients.

Published
2022

16. Management of Patients with Advanced Prostate Cancer: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021

Author

Gillessen, S, Armstrong, A, Attard, G, Beer, TM, Beltran, H, Bjartell, A, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Bristow, RG, Bulbul, M, Caffo, O, Chi, KN, Clarke, CS, Clarke, N, Davis, ID, de Bono, JS, Duran, I, Eeles, R, Efstathiou, E, Efstathiou, J, Ekeke, ON, Evans, CP, Fanti, S, Feng, FY, Fizazi, K, Frydenberg, M, George, D, Gleave, M, Halabi, S, Heinrich, D, Higano, C, Hofman, MS, Hussain, M, James, N, Jones, R, Kanesvaran, R, Khauli, RB, Klotz, L, Leibowitz, R, Logothetis, C, Maluf, F, Millman, R, Morgans, AK, Morris, MJ, Mottet, N, Mrabti, H, Murphy, DG, Murthy, V, Oh, WK, Ost, P, O'Sullivan, JM, Padhani, AR, Parker, C, Poon, DMC, Pritchard, CC, Rabah, DM, Rathkopf, D, Reiter, RE, Rubin, M, Ryan, CJ, Saad, F, Sade, JP, Sartor, O, Scher, H, Shore, N, Skoneczna, I, Small, E, Smith, M, Soule, H, Spratt, DE, Sternberg, CN, Suzuki, H, Sweeney, C, Sydes, MR, Taplin, M-E, Tilki, D, Tombal, B, Turkeri, L, Uemura, H, van Oort, I, Yamoah, K, Ye, D, Zapatero, A, Omlin, A, Gillessen, S, Armstrong, A, Attard, G, Beer, TM, Beltran, H, Bjartell, A, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Bristow, RG, Bulbul, M, Caffo, O, Chi, KN, Clarke, CS, Clarke, N, Davis, ID, de Bono, JS, Duran, I, Eeles, R, Efstathiou, E, Efstathiou, J, Ekeke, ON, Evans, CP, Fanti, S, Feng, FY, Fizazi, K, Frydenberg, M, George, D, Gleave, M, Halabi, S, Heinrich, D, Higano, C, Hofman, MS, Hussain, M, James, N, Jones, R, Kanesvaran, R, Khauli, RB, Klotz, L, Leibowitz, R, Logothetis, C, Maluf, F, Millman, R, Morgans, AK, Morris, MJ, Mottet, N, Mrabti, H, Murphy, DG, Murthy, V, Oh, WK, Ost, P, O'Sullivan, JM, Padhani, AR, Parker, C, Poon, DMC, Pritchard, CC, Rabah, DM, Rathkopf, D, Reiter, RE, Rubin, M, Ryan, CJ, Saad, F, Sade, JP, Sartor, O, Scher, H, Shore, N, Skoneczna, I, Small, E, Smith, M, Soule, H, Spratt, DE, Sternberg, CN, Suzuki, H, Sweeney, C, Sydes, MR, Taplin, M-E, Tilki, D, Tombal, B, Turkeri, L, Uemura, H, van Oort, I, Yamoah, K, Ye, D, Zapatero, A, and Omlin, A

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. OBJECTIVE: To present the voting results from APCCC 2021. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: The experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. CONCLUSIONS: These voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical eviden

Published
2022

17. What Experts Think About Prostate Cancer Management During the COVID-19 Pandemic: Report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021 (vol 82, pg 6, 2022)

Author

Turco, F, Armstrong, A, Attard, G, Beer, TM, Beltran, H, Bjartell, A, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Bristow, RG, Bulbul, M, Caffo, O, Chi, KN, Clarke, C, Clarke, N, Davis, ID, de Bono, J, Duran, I, Eeles, R, Efstathiou, E, Efstathiou, J, Evans, CP, Fanti, S, Feng, FY, Fizazi, K, Frydenberg, M, George, D, Gleave, M, Halabi, S, Heinrich, D, Higano, C, Hofman, MS, Hussain, M, James, N, Jones, R, Kanesvaran, R, Khauli, RB, Klotz, L, Leibowitz, R, Logothetis, C, Maluf, F, Millman, R, Morgans, AK, Morris, MJ, Mottet, N, Mrabti, H, Murphy, DG, Murthy, V, Oh, WK, Ekeke, ON, Ost, P, O'Sullivan, JM, Padhani, AR, Parker, C, Poon, DMC, Pritchard, CC, Rabah, DM, Rathkopf, D, Reiter, RE, Rubin, M, Ryan, CJ, Saad, F, Sade, JP, Sartor, O, Scher, HI, Shore, N, Skoneczna, I, Small, E, Smith, M, Soule, H, Spratt, D, Sternberg, CN, Suzuki, H, Sweeney, C, Sydes, M, Taplin, M-E, Tilki, D, Tombal, B, Turkeri, L, Uemura, H, van Oort, I, Yamoah, K, Ye, D, Zapatero, A, Gillessen, S, Omlin, A, Turco, F, Armstrong, A, Attard, G, Beer, TM, Beltran, H, Bjartell, A, Bossi, A, Briganti, A, Bristow, RG, Bulbul, M, Caffo, O, Chi, KN, Clarke, C, Clarke, N, Davis, ID, de Bono, J, Duran, I, Eeles, R, Efstathiou, E, Efstathiou, J, Evans, CP, Fanti, S, Feng, FY, Fizazi, K, Frydenberg, M, George, D, Gleave, M, Halabi, S, Heinrich, D, Higano, C, Hofman, MS, Hussain, M, James, N, Jones, R, Kanesvaran, R, Khauli, RB, Klotz, L, Leibowitz, R, Logothetis, C, Maluf, F, Millman, R, Morgans, AK, Morris, MJ, Mottet, N, Mrabti, H, Murphy, DG, Murthy, V, Oh, WK, Ekeke, ON, Ost, P, O'Sullivan, JM, Padhani, AR, Parker, C, Poon, DMC, Pritchard, CC, Rabah, DM, Rathkopf, D, Reiter, RE, Rubin, M, Ryan, CJ, Saad, F, Sade, JP, Sartor, O, Scher, HI, Shore, N, Skoneczna, I, Small, E, Smith, M, Soule, H, Spratt, D, Sternberg, CN, Suzuki, H, Sweeney, C, Sydes, M, Taplin, M-E, Tilki, D, Tombal, B, Turkeri, L, Uemura, H, van Oort, I, Yamoah, K, Ye, D, Zapatero, A, Gillessen, S, and Omlin, A

Published
2022

18. Management of patients with advanced prostate cancer: report from the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021

Author

Tilki, Derya, Gillessen, S.; Armstron, A.; Attard, G.; Beer, T.M.; Beltran, H.; Bjartell, A.; Bossi, A.; Briganti, A.; Bristow, R.G.; Bulbul, M.; Caffo, O.; Chi, K.N.; Clarke, C.S.; Clarke, N.; Davis, I.D.; de Bono, J.S.; Duran, I.; Eeles, R.; Efstathiou, E.; Efstathiou, J.; Ekeke, O.N.; Evans, C.P.; Fanti, S.; Feng, F.Y.; Fizazi, K.; Frydenberg, M.; George, D.; Gleave, M.; Halabi, S.; Heinrich, D.; Higano, C.; Hofman, M.S.; Hussain, M.; James, N.; Jones, R.; Kanesvaran, R.; Khauli, R.B.; Klotz, L.; Leibowitz, R.; Logothetis, C.; Maluf, F.; Millman, R.; Morgans, A.K.; Morris, M.J.; Mottet, N.; Mrabti, H.; Murphy, D.G.; Murthy, V.; Oh, W.K.; Ost, P.; O'Sullivan, J.M.; Padhani, A.R.; Parker, C.; Poon, D.M.C.; Pritchard, C.C.; Rabah, D.M.; Rathkopf, D.; Reiter, R.E.; Rubin, M.; Ryan, C.J.; Saad, F.; Sade, J.P.; Sartor, O.; Scher, H.I.; Shore, N.; Skoneczna, I.; Small, E.; Smith, M.; Soule, H.; Spratt, D.E.; Sternberg, C.N.; Suzuki, H.; Sweeney, C.; Sydes, M.R.; Taplin, M.E.; Tombal, B.; Türkeri, L.; Uemura, H.; Uemura, H.; van Oort, I., Yamoah, K.; Ye, D.; Zapatero, A.; Omlin, A., Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, Tilki, Derya, Gillessen, S.; Armstron, A.; Attard, G.; Beer, T.M.; Beltran, H.; Bjartell, A.; Bossi, A.; Briganti, A.; Bristow, R.G.; Bulbul, M.; Caffo, O.; Chi, K.N.; Clarke, C.S.; Clarke, N.; Davis, I.D.; de Bono, J.S.; Duran, I.; Eeles, R.; Efstathiou, E.; Efstathiou, J.; Ekeke, O.N.; Evans, C.P.; Fanti, S.; Feng, F.Y.; Fizazi, K.; Frydenberg, M.; George, D.; Gleave, M.; Halabi, S.; Heinrich, D.; Higano, C.; Hofman, M.S.; Hussain, M.; James, N.; Jones, R.; Kanesvaran, R.; Khauli, R.B.; Klotz, L.; Leibowitz, R.; Logothetis, C.; Maluf, F.; Millman, R.; Morgans, A.K.; Morris, M.J.; Mottet, N.; Mrabti, H.; Murphy, D.G.; Murthy, V.; Oh, W.K.; Ost, P.; O'Sullivan, J.M.; Padhani, A.R.; Parker, C.; Poon, D.M.C.; Pritchard, C.C.; Rabah, D.M.; Rathkopf, D.; Reiter, R.E.; Rubin, M.; Ryan, C.J.; Saad, F.; Sade, J.P.; Sartor, O.; Scher, H.I.; Shore, N.; Skoneczna, I.; Small, E.; Smith, M.; Soule, H.; Spratt, D.E.; Sternberg, C.N.; Suzuki, H.; Sweeney, C.; Sydes, M.R.; Taplin, M.E.; Tombal, B.; Türkeri, L.; Uemura, H.; Uemura, H.; van Oort, I., Yamoah, K.; Ye, D.; Zapatero, A.; Omlin, A., Koç University Hospital, and School of Medicine

Abstract

Background: innovations in treatments, imaging, and molecular characterisation in advanced prostate cancer have improved outcomes, but various areas of management still lack high-level evidence to inform clinical practice. The 2021 Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) addressed some of these questions to supplement guidelines that are based on level 1 evidence. Objective: to present the voting results from APCCC 2021. Design, setting, and participants: the experts identified three major areas of controversy related to management of advanced prostate cancer: newly diagnosed metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer (mHSPC), the use of prostate-specific membrane antigen ligands in diagnostics and therapy, and molecular characterisation of tissue and blood. A panel of 86 international prostate cancer experts developed the programme and the consensus questions. Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: The panel voted publicly but anonymously on 107 pre-defined questions, which were developed by both voting and non-voting panel members prior to the conference following a modified Delphi process. Results and limitations: the voting reflected the opinions of panellists and did not incorporate a standard literature review or formal meta-analysis. The answer options for the consensus questions received varying degrees of support from panellists, as reflected in this article and the detailed voting results reported in the Supplementary material. Conclusions: these voting results from a panel of experts in advanced prostate cancer can help clinicians and patients to navigate controversial areas of management for which high-level evidence is scant. However, diagnostic and treatment decisions should always be individualised according to patient characteristics, such as the extent and location of disease, prior treatment(s), comorbidities, patient preferences, and treatment recommendations, and should also incorporate current and emerging clinical eviden, National Health and Medical Research Council (NHMRC) Practitioner Fellowship; Prostate Cancer Foundation; Peter MacCallum Foundation; NHMRC Investigator Grant

Published
2022

19. What experts think about prostate cancer management during the COVID-19 pandemic: report from The Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021

Author

Tilki, Derya, Turco, F.; Armstrong, A.; Attard, G.; Beer, T.M.; Beltran, H.; Bjartell, A.; Bossi, A.; Briganti, A.; Bristow, R.G.; Bulbul, M.; Caffo, O.; Chi, K.N.; Clarke, C.S.; Clarke, N.; Davis, I.D.; de Bono, J.; Duran, I.; Eeles, R.; Efstathiou, E.; Efstathiou, J.; Evans, C.P.; Fanti, S.; Feng, F.Y.; Fizazi, K.; Frydenberg, M.; George, D.; Gleave, M.; Halabi, S.; Heinrich, D.; Higano, C.; Hofman, M.S.; Hussain, M.; James, N.; Jones, R.; Kanesvaran, R.; Khauli, R.B.; Klotz, L.; Leibowitz, R.; Logothetis, C.; Maluf, F.; Millman, R.; Morgans, A.K.; Morris, M.J.; Mottet, N.; Mrabti, H.; Murphy, D.G.; Murthy, V.; Oh, W.K.; Ekeke, O.N.; Ost, P.; O'Sullivan, J.M.; Padhani, A.R.; Parker, C.; Poon, D.M.C.; Pritchard, C.C.; Rabah, D.M.; Rathkopf, D.; Reiter, R.E.; Rubin, M.; Ryan, C.J.; Saad, F.; Sade, J.P.; Sartor, O.; Scher, H.I.; Shore, N.; Skoneczna, I.; Small, E.; Smith, M.; Soule, H.; Spratt, D.E.; Sternberg, C.N.; Suzuki, H.; Sweeney, C.; Sydes, M.R.; Taplin, M.-E.; Tombal, B.; Türkeri, L.; Uemura, H.; Uemura, H.; van Oort, I.; Yamoah, K.; Ye, D.; Zapatero, A.; Gillessen, S.; Omlin, A., Koç University Hospital, School of Medicine, Tilki, Derya, Turco, F.; Armstrong, A.; Attard, G.; Beer, T.M.; Beltran, H.; Bjartell, A.; Bossi, A.; Briganti, A.; Bristow, R.G.; Bulbul, M.; Caffo, O.; Chi, K.N.; Clarke, C.S.; Clarke, N.; Davis, I.D.; de Bono, J.; Duran, I.; Eeles, R.; Efstathiou, E.; Efstathiou, J.; Evans, C.P.; Fanti, S.; Feng, F.Y.; Fizazi, K.; Frydenberg, M.; George, D.; Gleave, M.; Halabi, S.; Heinrich, D.; Higano, C.; Hofman, M.S.; Hussain, M.; James, N.; Jones, R.; Kanesvaran, R.; Khauli, R.B.; Klotz, L.; Leibowitz, R.; Logothetis, C.; Maluf, F.; Millman, R.; Morgans, A.K.; Morris, M.J.; Mottet, N.; Mrabti, H.; Murphy, D.G.; Murthy, V.; Oh, W.K.; Ekeke, O.N.; Ost, P.; O'Sullivan, J.M.; Padhani, A.R.; Parker, C.; Poon, D.M.C.; Pritchard, C.C.; Rabah, D.M.; Rathkopf, D.; Reiter, R.E.; Rubin, M.; Ryan, C.J.; Saad, F.; Sade, J.P.; Sartor, O.; Scher, H.I.; Shore, N.; Skoneczna, I.; Small, E.; Smith, M.; Soule, H.; Spratt, D.E.; Sternberg, C.N.; Suzuki, H.; Sweeney, C.; Sydes, M.R.; Taplin, M.-E.; Tombal, B.; Türkeri, L.; Uemura, H.; Uemura, H.; van Oort, I.; Yamoah, K.; Ye, D.; Zapatero, A.; Gillessen, S.; Omlin, A., Koç University Hospital, and School of Medicine

Abstract

Patients with advanced prostate cancer (APC) may be at greater risk for severe illness, hospitalisation, or death from coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) due to male gender, older age, potential immunosuppressive treatments, or comorbidities. Thus, the optimal management of APC patients during the COVID-19 pandemic is complex. In October 2021, during the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference (APCCC) 2021, the 73 voting members of the panel members discussed and voted on 13 questions on this topic that could help clinicians make treatment choices during the pandemic. There was a consensus for full COVID-19 vaccination and booster injection in APC patients. Furthermore, the voting results indicate that the expert's treatment recommendations are influenced by the vaccination status: the COVID-19 pandemic altered management of APC patients for 70% of the panellists before the vaccination was available but only for 25% of panellists for fully vaccinated patients. Most experts (71%) were less likely to use docetaxel and abiraterone in unvaccinated patients with metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. For fully vaccinated patients with high-risk localised prostate cancer, there was a consensus (77%) to follow the usual treatment schedule, whereas in unvaccinated patients, 55% of the panel members voted for deferring radiation therapy. Finally, there was a strong consensus for the use of telemedicine for monitoring APC patients. Patient summary: In the Advanced Prostate Cancer Consensus Conference 2021, the panellists reached a consensus regarding the recommendation of the COVID-19 vaccine in prostate cancer patients and use of telemedicine for monitoring these patients., NA

Published
2022

23. LBA85 Niraparib (NIRA) with abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (AAP) as first-line (1L) therapy in patients (pts) with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and homologous recombination repair (HRR) gene alterations: Three-year update and final analysis (FA) of MAGNITUDE

Author

Chi, K.N.N., Castro, E., Attard, G., Smith, M.R., Sandhu, S.K., Efstathiou, E., Roubaud, G., Small, E.J.J., Gomes, A.J.P.D.S., Rathkopf, D., Saad, M., Gurney, H.P., Jung, W., Mason, G.E., Dibaj, S., Wu, D., Diorio, B., Lopez-Gitlitz, A., Kim, W., and Olmos, D.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

24. 1806P Efficacy of niraparib and abiraterone acetate plus prednisone (NIRA+AAP) in homologous recombination repair gene-altered (HRR+) metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) by tissue and/or plasma assays in the MAGNITUDE trial

Author

Attard, G., Sandhu, S.K., Rathkopf, D., Castro, E., Saad, M., Smith, M.R., Small, E.J.J., Olmos, D., Gomes, A.J.P.D.S., Roubaud, G., Zurawski, B., Efstathiou, E., Wu, D., Diorio, B., Urtishak, K., Singh, U., Xu, Y., Lopez-Gitlitz, A., del Corral, A., and Chi, K.N.N.

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

25. A phase III randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study of niraparib plus abiraterone acetate and prednisone versus abiraterone acetate and prednisone in patients with metastatic prostate cancer (NCT03748641)

Author

Chi, K.N., primary, Rathkopf, D., additional, Attard, G., additional, Smith, M.R., additional, Efstathiou, E., additional, Olmos, D., additional, Small, E.J., additional, Lee, J.Y., additional, Sieber, P., additional, Dunshee, C., additional, Ricci, D., additional, Simon, J.S., additional, Zhao, X., additional, Kothari, N., additional, Cheng, S., additional, and Sandhu, S.K., additional

Published
2019
Full Text
View/download PDF

26. Optimizing anticancer therapy in metastatic non-castrate prostate cancer: American society of clinical oncology clinical practice guideline

Author

Bangs, R., Rathkopf, D., Loblaw, A., Rumble, R.B., Hotte, S.J., Morris, M.J., Basch, E., Milowsky, M.I., and Celano, P.

Abstract

Purpose This clinical practice guideline addresses abiraterone or docetaxel with androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for metastatic prostate cancer that has not been treated (or has been minimally treated) with testosterone-lowering agents. Methods Standard therapy for newly diagnosed metastatic prostate cancer has been ADT alone. Three studies have compared ADT alone with ADT and docetaxel, and two studies have compared ADT alone with ADT and abiraterone. Results Three prospective randomized studies (GETUG-AFU 15, STAMPEDE, and CHAARTED) examined overall survival (OS) with adding docetaxel to ADT. STAMPEDE and CHAARTED favored docetaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.78; 95% CI, 0.66 to 0.93; n = 2,962 and HR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.89; n = 790, respectively). GETUG-AFU 15 was negative. LATITUDE and STAMPEDE examined the impact on OS of adding abiraterone (with prednisone or prednisolone) to ADT. LATITUDE and STAMPEDE favored abiraterone (HR, 0.62; 95% CI, 0.51 to 0.76; n = 1,199 and HR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.52 to 0.76; n = 1,917, respectively). Recommendations ADT plus docetaxel or abiraterone in newly diagnosed metastatic non-castrate prostate cancer offers a survival benefit as compared with ADT alone. The strongest evidence of benefit with docetaxel is in men with de novo high-volume (CHAARTED criteria) metastatic disease. Similar survival benefits are seen using abiraterone acetate in high-risk patients (LATITUDE criteria) and in the metastatic population in STAMPEDE. ADT plus abiraterone and ADT plus docetaxel have not been compared, and it is not known if some men benefit more from one regimen as opposed to the other. Fitness for chemotherapy, patient comorbidities, toxicity profiles, quality of life, drug availability, and cost should be considered in this decision. Additional information is available at www.asco.org/genitourinary-cancer-guidelines.

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

28. Radiographic progression with nonrising PSA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer:post hoc analysis of PREVAIL

Author

Bryce, A H, Alumkal, J J, Armstrong, A, Higano, C S, Iversen, P, Sternberg, C N, Rathkopf, D, Loriot, Y, de Bono, J, Tombal, B, Abhyankar, S, Lin, P, Krivoshik, A, Phung, D, Beer, T M, Bryce, A H, Alumkal, J J, Armstrong, A, Higano, C S, Iversen, P, Sternberg, C N, Rathkopf, D, Loriot, Y, de Bono, J, Tombal, B, Abhyankar, S, Lin, P, Krivoshik, A, Phung, D, and Beer, T M

Published
2017

29. Enzalutamide in Men with Chemotherapy-naive Metastatic Castration-resistant Prostate Cancer: Extended Analysis of the Phase 3 PREVAIL Study

Author

Beer, T.M., Armstrong, A.J., Rathkopf, D., Loriot, Y., Sternberg, C.N., Higano, C.S., Iversen, P., Evans, C.P., Kim, C.S., Kimura, G., Miller, K., Saad, F., Bjartell, A.S., Borre, M., Mulders, P.F.A., Tammela, T.L., Parli, T., Sari, S., Os, S. van, Theeuwes, A., Tombal, B., Beer, T.M., Armstrong, A.J., Rathkopf, D., Loriot, Y., Sternberg, C.N., Higano, C.S., Iversen, P., Evans, C.P., Kim, C.S., Kimura, G., Miller, K., Saad, F., Bjartell, A.S., Borre, M., Mulders, P.F.A., Tammela, T.L., Parli, T., Sari, S., Os, S. van, Theeuwes, A., and Tombal, B.

Abstract

Contains fulltext : 173185.pdf (publisher's version ) (Closed access), Enzalutamide significantly improved radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS) among men with chemotherapy-naive metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer at the prespecified interim analysis of PREVAIL, a phase 3, double-blind, randomized study. We evaluated the longer-term efficacy and safety of enzalutamide up to the prespecified number of deaths in the final analysis, which included an additional 20 mo of follow-up for investigator-assessed rPFS, 9 mo of follow-up for OS, and 4 mo of follow-up for safety. Enzalutamide reduced the risk of radiographic progression or death by 68% (hazard ratio [HR] 0.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.28-0.37; p<0.0001) and the risk of death by 23% (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.67-0.88; p=0.0002). Median investigator-assessed rPFS was 20.0 mo (95% CI 18.9-22.1) in the enzalutamide arm and 5.4 mo (95% CI 4.1-5.6) in the placebo arm. Median OS was 35.3 mo (95% CI 32.2-not yet reached) in the enzalutamide arm and 31.3 mo (95% CI 28.8-34.2) in the placebo arm. At the time of the OS analysis, 167 patients in the placebo arm had crossed over to receive enzalutamide. The most common adverse events in the enzalutamide arm were fatigue, back pain, constipation, and arthralgia. This final analysis of PREVAIL provides more complete assessment of the clinical benefit of enzalutamide. PREVAIL is registered on ClinicalTrials.gov as NCT01212991. PATIENT SUMMARY: According to data from longer follow-up, enzalutamide continued to provide benefit over placebo in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer.

Published
2017

30. Radiographic progression with nonrising PSA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: post hoc analysis of PREVAIL.

Author

UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'urologie, Bryce, A H, Alumkal, J J, Armstrong, A, Higano, C S, Iversen, P, Sternberg, C N, Rathkopf, D, Loriot, Y, de Bono, J, Tombal, Bertrand, Abhyankar, S, Lin, P, Krivoshik, A, Phung, D, Beer, T M, UCL - SSS/IREC/CHEX - Pôle de chirgurgie expérimentale et transplantation, UCL - (SLuc) Service d'urologie, Bryce, A H, Alumkal, J J, Armstrong, A, Higano, C S, Iversen, P, Sternberg, C N, Rathkopf, D, Loriot, Y, de Bono, J, Tombal, Bertrand, Abhyankar, S, Lin, P, Krivoshik, A, Phung, D, and Beer, T M

Abstract

Advanced prostate cancer is a phenotypically diverse disease that evolves through multiple clinical courses. PSA level is the most widely used parameter for disease monitoring, but it has well-recognized limitations. Unlike in clinical trials, in practice, clinicians may rely on PSA monitoring alone to determine disease status on therapy. This approach has not been adequately tested.

Published
2017

33. Radiographic progression with nonrising PSA in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: post hoc analysis of PREVAIL

Author

Bryce, A H, primary, Alumkal, J J, additional, Armstrong, A, additional, Higano, C S, additional, Iversen, P, additional, Sternberg, C N, additional, Rathkopf, D, additional, Loriot, Y, additional, de Bono, J, additional, Tombal, B, additional, Abhyankar, S, additional, Lin, P, additional, Krivoshik, A, additional, Phung, D, additional, and Beer, T M, additional

Published
2017
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. 444 Presence of AR-V7 splice variant or AR C terminal loss in the CTCs of mCRPC patients identifies patients with improved PSA response with taxanes over androgen receptor signaling directed therapies (ARS Rx)

Author

Scher, H.I., primary, Kelvin, J., additional, Lu, D., additional, Louw, J., additional, Packer, D., additional, Bambury, R., additional, Rathkopf, D., additional, Schreiber, N., additional, Brennan, R., additional, Prigozhina, N., additional, Brown, D., additional, Jendrisak, A., additional, Dugan, L., additional, Landers, M., additional, Lee, F., additional, Fleisher, M., additional, Marrinucci, D., additional, and Dittamore, R., additional

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

36. 864 Does Gleason score at initial diagnosis predict efficacy of abiraterone acetate (AA) therapy in patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC)? An analysis of AA phase 3 trials

Author

Stöckle, M., primary, Flaig, T., additional, Ohlmann, C.H., additional, Scher, H.I., additional, De Bono, J.S., additional, Rathkopf, D., additional, Ryan, C.J., additional, Kheoh, T., additional, Li, J., additional, Todd, M., additional, Griffin, T.W., additional, Molina, A., additional, and Fizazi, K., additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

37. 861 Impact of prior endocrine therapy on radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) in patients with chemotherapy-naïve metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: Results from COU-AA-302

Author

Schrijvers, D., primary, Kheoh, T., additional, Yu, M.K., additional, Smith, M.R., additional, Small, E.J., additional, Mulders, P.F., additional, Fizazi, K., additional, Rathkopf, D., additional, Saad, F., additional, Scher, H.I., additional, Oudard, S., additional, Bellmunt, J., additional, Taplin, M-E., additional, Davis, I.D., additional, Protheroe, A., additional, Molina, A., additional, Griffin, T.W., additional, De Bono, J.S., additional, and Ryan, C.J., additional

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

38. Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in chemotherapy-naive men with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: patient-reported outcome results of a randomised phase 3 trial

Author

Basch, E., Autio, K., Ryan, C.J., Mulders, P.F.A., Shore, N., Kheoh, T., Fizazi, K., Logothetis, C.J., Rathkopf, D., Smith, M.R., Mainwaring, P.N., Hao, Y., Griffin, T., Li, S., Meyers, M.L., Molina, A., Cleeland, C., Basch, E., Autio, K., Ryan, C.J., Mulders, P.F.A., Shore, N., Kheoh, T., Fizazi, K., Logothetis, C.J., Rathkopf, D., Smith, M.R., Mainwaring, P.N., Hao, Y., Griffin, T., Li, S., Meyers, M.L., Molina, A., and Cleeland, C.

Abstract

Item does not contain fulltext, BACKGROUND: Abiraterone acetate plus prednisone significantly improves radiographic progression-free survival in asymptomatic or mildly symptomatic, chemotherapy-naive patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer compared with prednisone alone. We describe analyses of data for patient-reported pain and functional status in a preplanned interim analysis of a phase 3 trial. METHODS: Between April 28, 2009, and June 23, 2010, patients with progressive, metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer were enrolled into a multinational, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial. Patients were eligible if they were asymptomatic (score of 0 or 1 on item three of the Brief Pain Inventory Short Form [BPI-SF] questionnaire) or mildly symptomatic (score of 2 or 3) and had not previously received chemotherapy. Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive oral abiraterone (1 g daily) plus prednisone (5 mg twice daily) or placebo plus prednisone in continuous 4-week cycles. Pain was assessed with the BPI-SF questionnaire, and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) with the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Prostate (FACT-P) questionnaire. We analysed data with prespecified criteria for clinically meaningful pain progression and deterioration in HRQoL. All patients who underwent randomisation were included in analyses. FINDINGS: 1088 patients underwent randomisation: 546 were assigned to abiraterone plus prednisone and 542 to placebo plus prednisone. At the time of the second prespecified interim analysis, median follow-up was 22.2 months (IQR 20.2-24.8). Median time to progression of mean pain intensity was longer in patients assigned to abiraterone plus prednisone (26.7 months [95% CI 19.3-not estimable]) than in those assigned to placebo plus prednisone (18.4 months [14.9-not estimable]; hazard ratio [HR] 0.82, 95% CI 0.67-1.00; p=0.0490), as was median time to progression of pain interference with daily activities (10.3 months [95% CI 9.3-13.0] vs 7.4 m

Published
2013

40. First-in-human Phase I study of EZN-4176, a locked nucleic acid antisense oligonucleotide to exon 4 of the androgen receptor mRNA in patients with castration-resistant prostate cancer

Author

Bianchini, D, primary, Omlin, A, additional, Pezaro, C, additional, Lorente, D, additional, Ferraldeschi, R, additional, Mukherji, D, additional, Crespo, M, additional, Figueiredo, I, additional, Miranda, S, additional, Riisnaes, R, additional, Zivi, A, additional, Buchbinder, A, additional, Rathkopf, D E, additional, Attard, G, additional, Scher, H I, additional, de Bono, J, additional, and Danila, D C, additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

41. 97 Updated interim analysis (IA): Results of randomized phase 3 study COU-AA-302 of abiraterone acetate (AA) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) patients (pts) without prior chemotherapy

Author

Van Poppel, H., primary, Rathkopf, D., additional, Smith, M.R., additional, De Bono, J.S., additional, Logothetis, C.J., additional, Shore, N.D., additional, De Souza, P., additional, Fizazi, K., additional, Mulders, P.F.A., additional, Mainwaring, P., additional, Hainsworth, J.D., additional, Beer, T.M., additional, North, S., additional, Fradet, Y., additional, Griffin, T., additional, Park, Y.C., additional, Kheoh, T., additional, Small, E.J., additional, Scher, H.I., additional, Molina, A., additional, and Ryan, C.J., additional

Published
2013
Full Text
View/download PDF

44. A first-in-human, open-label, phase I/II safety, pharmacokinetic, and proof-of-concept study of ARN-509 in patients with progressive advanced castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Author

Rathkopf, D. E., primary, Danila, D. C., additional, Slovin, S. F., additional, Morris, M. J., additional, Steinbrecher, J. E., additional, Chen, Y., additional, Fleisher, M., additional, Larson, S. M., additional, Sawyers, C. L., additional, and Scher, H. I., additional

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

46. Anti-insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-1R) monoclonal antibody cixutumumab (cix) plus mTOR inhibitor temsirolimus (tem) in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC): Results of a phase I pilot study.

Author

Rathkopf, D. E., primary, Danila, D. C., additional, Morris, M. J., additional, Slovin, S. F., additional, Borwick, L. S., additional, Momen, L., additional, Curley, T., additional, Arauz, G., additional, Larson, S. M., additional, Fleisher, M., additional, Rosen, N., additional, and Scher, H. I., additional

Published
2011
Full Text
View/download PDF

47. Anti-insulin-like growth factor-1 receptor (IGF-IR) monoclonal antibody cixutumumab plus mammalian target of rapamycin (mTOR) inhibitor temsirolimus in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC).

Author

Rathkopf, D. E., primary, Danila, D. C., additional, Chudow, J. J., additional, Morris, M. J., additional, Slovin, S. F., additional, Fine, S., additional, Fox, J. J., additional, Larson, S. M., additional, Rosen, N., additional, and Scher, H. I., additional

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

49. Molecular profiling of circulating tumor cells (CTC) in patients with castrate metastatic prostate cancer (CMPC) receiving abiraterone acetate (AA) after failure of docetaxel-based chemotherapy.

Author

Danila, D. C., primary, Anand, A., additional, Sung, C. C., additional, Leversha, M., additional, Rathkopf, D. E., additional, Morris, M. J., additional, Slovin, S. F., additional, Molina, A., additional, Fleisher, M., additional, and Scher, H. I., additional

Published
2010
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results