1. Outcomes of Heart Failure Admissions Under Observation Versus Short Inpatient Stay
- Author
-
Ahmad Masri, Andrew D. Althouse, Jeffrey McKibben, Floyd Thoma, Michael Mathier, Ravi Ramani, Jeffrey Teuteberg, Oscar Marroquin, Joon S. Lee, and Suresh R. Mulukutla
- Subjects
admission under observation ,death ,health policy ,heart failure ,outcomes research ,readmission ,Diseases of the circulatory (Cardiovascular) system ,RC666-701 - Abstract
BackgroundPatients with heart failure (HF) are admitted either under observation (OBS) or inpatient stays; however, there is little data on whether this designation reflects the clinical status of a patient, with significant logistical and financial implications. We sought to compare the outcomes of patients with HF admitted OBS versus inpatient stay (≤2 days; INPT). Methods and ResultsFrom January 1, 2008 to September 30, 2015, our multisite health system saw 21 339 unique patients totaling 52 493 hospital admissions with a primary diagnosis of HF. Patients were excluded if they underwent cardiac surgery (n=611), heart transplantation (n=187), or left ventricular assist device insertion (n=198), or if they died during hospitalization (n=1839). Of the remaining 50 654 discharges, 2 groups were identified: INPT group and OBS group. Outcomes were HF readmission, all‐cause readmission, and all‐cause mortality within 1 year of discharge. Hazard ratios were computed using the Andersen‐Gill method in the Cox proportional‐hazards model. A total of 8709 admissions (17%) occurred in the INPT group and 2648 admissions (5%) occurred in the OBS group. HF readmission rate at 1 year was 55.3% in INPT versus 66.5% in OBS (hazard ratio, 0.75; 95% confidence interval, 0.71–0.80; P
- Published
- 2018
- Full Text
- View/download PDF