Search

This study discusses a computer simulation for the equivalent ambient dose due to photons, H*(10)p, and neutrons, H*(10)n, in the patient's plane undergoing radiation therapy. A standard radiotherapy room with an additional shielding made by one lead or steel tenth-value layer was considered. A Varian 2100/2300 C/D linear accelerator head operating at 18 MV was modeled. Jaw openings of 5 cm × 5 cm, 10 cm × 10 cm, 20 cm × 20 cm, and 30 cm × 30 cm, as well as the multileaf collimator under eight different angles of gantry inclination, were also modeled. The use of steel in the shield generates a slightly raised average value of H*(10)p (0.527%) compared to when using lead. This finding can be interpreted as that the use of lead or steel coating makes no difference to the additional shield calculations when only photons are considered. When considering the contribution to H*(10)n, there is a significant difference (11.7% increase) for using lead compared to steel shielding., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

This study focusses on the risk of potential exposure to radiation for personnel driving a truck as well as illegal individuals being transported in cargo containers. Inspection facilities usually use a high energy linear accelerator (linac) in order to inspect the cargo. Since this type of equipment has associated health risks due to potential unwanted exposure, the occupational and public dose limits should be calculated in order to develop safer work conditions. This work used a computation model running the code MCNPX to simulate a typical cargo inspection facility which used a linac operating at 4.5 MeV. Two scenarios were considered: (1) exposure of the driver to the primary beam due to a potential failure of the safety sensors; and (2) dose received by an illegal individual being transported inside the cargo container. The results show a dose of 0.8514 mSv per scan for the driver exposed to the primary X-ray beam, and 0.1997 mSv per scan for an individual transported in the cargo box. In conclusion, both the individual and the driver received a dose below the acceptable limit considered safe for an individual (1 mSv/year). However, that was the value of one scan; in a case in which multiple scans would be performed, the dose limit can be quickly exceeded. In that case, the limit would be exceeded by the driver faster than by the individual in the cargo., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The Nuclear Engineering Department of the Military Institute of Engineering (SE/7-IME) is designing and simulation a neutron irradiator with 1 Ci of 241 Am- 9 Be source. The objective of this irradiator is to generate a flux of neutrons to be used in research and teaching maintaining, for purposes of radiological protection, the rate of ambient dose equivalent, H*(10), below 10 μSv/h at 30 cm from the surface. This paper presents the proposed irradiator, values of H*(10) at different distances from the irradiator and the neutron flux in different points of the beam irradiation, all calculated using the MCNPX code., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

The National Council on Radiation Protection and Measurements (NCRP) Report No. 151 is an essential document for bunker design commonly applied for radiotherapy treatment rooms. This document is used as a reference by several countries, including Brazil. The objective of this study is to evaluate the shielding dimensioning methodology recommended by NCRP 151, and compare it with the one adopted by the Brazilian regulatory authority. Radiotherapy rooms and respective doors were designed to use linear accelerators operating at 6, 10, 15, and 18 MeV under two different ways: (a) applying exclusively the methodology recommended by the NCRP 151, and (b) taking into consideration the complementary recommendations from the Brazilian authorities. The results suggest that designers in Brazil can count on at least 4 and 11% safety margin for dimensioning primary barriers in controlled and free areas respectively. Also 8% for secondary barriers in controlled areas, 9.7% for secondary barriers adjacent to the primary belt of free areas, and 6.6% for the lead of the doors., (© 2020 IOP Publishing Ltd.)

Medical linear accelerators (linacs) require a physical structure designed to provide adequate structural support which ensures the safety of patients, operators and the general public. During a radiotherapy session, healthy tissues are exposed to radiation, even with these safety guarantees. This unwanted exposure may increase the likelihood of developing secondary cancer. This work uses the MCNP-5 code to computationally simulate a conformational 3D radiotherapy protocol for prostate cancer. Also, it investigates the potential effects of radiotherapy room shielding composition on equivalent and effective doses in the patient's body. A computational model of an actual room was developed considering a Varian Trilogy linac operating at 10 MeV. This model enabled dose calculations for an anthropomorphic phantom called REX to be performed. This phantom has sufficient details of all relevant organs and tissues needed to estimate the effective dose of the patient. The treatment protocol modeled in this study came from the database of patients treated by the Brazilian National Cancer Institute (Inca). For this protocol, the total dose to be applied to the patient is equally distributed over the four gantry inclination angles (0°, 90°, 180° and 270°). The simulated results suggested that the equivalent dose on different organs and tissues has been increased by concrete shielding. Regarding the effective dose due to the presence of additional shielding (steel or lead), the simulation suggests that such variations can be considered small. Overall the results allowed quantifying the specific contribution of concrete, lead, and steel as part of shielding on the equivalent and effective doses in the patient., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2020 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Currently, lung cancer is one of the most lethal types of cancer (IARC, 2012), the pathology being detected in advanced stage, when the tumor has considerable volume because the disease in most cases asymptomatic in the early stages (INCA, 2016). Dosimetry analysis of healthy organs under real conditions is not feasible. Therefore, computational simulations are used to aid in dose verification in organs of patients submitted to radiotherapy. The goal of this study was to calculate the equivalent dose, due to photons, in the surrounding of healthy organs of patients submitted to radiotherapy for lung cancer, through computational modeling. The simulation was performed using the MCNPX code (MNCPX, 2006), Rex and Regina phantoms (ICRP 110, 2009), radiotherapy room, Siemens Oncor Expression accelerator operating at 6 MV and treatment protocol adopted at the INCA (National Cancer Institute - Brazil). The results obtained, considering the dose due to photons for both phantoms indicate that organs located inside the thoracic cavity received higher dose, being the bronchi, heart and esophagus more affected, due to their anatomical positioning. Clinical data describe the development of bronchiolitis, esophagitis and cardiomyopathies with decreased cardiopulmonary function as one of the major effects of lung cancer treatment. In the Regina phantom, the second largest dose was in the region of the breasts with 615.73 mSv/Gy, while in the Rex the dose was 514.06 mSv/Gy, event related to the difference of anatomical structure of the organ. A qualitative analysis was performed between the dose deposition profile of the treatment planning system and the simulated treatment through the tmesh command and a similar profile of dose distribution was verified throughout the patient's body., (Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

A radiological dispersal device (RDD) is a simple weapon capable of causing human harm, environmental contamination, disruption, area denial, and economic cost. It can affect small, large, or long areas depending on atmospheric stability. The risk of developing a radio-induced cancer depends on exposure, and an effective response depends upon available timely guidance. This article proposes and demonstrates a convergence of three different capabilities to assess risk and support rapid safe resource efficient response. The three capabilities that are integrated are Hotspot for dispersion, RERF for epidemiological risk, and RESRAD-RDD for response guidance. The combined methodology supports decisions on risk reduction and resource allocation through work schedules, the designation and composition of response teams, and siting for operations. In the illustrative RDD scenario, the contamination area for sheltering, evacuation, and long-term public concern was greatest for calm atmospheric conditions, whilst close-quarter responders faced highest dose rates for neutral atmospheric conditions. Generally, the risks to women responders were found to be significantly greater than for men, and the risks to 20-year-old responders were three times that of their 60-year-old counterparts for similar exposure., (© 2015 Society for Risk Analysis.)

This work aims at presenting a study using Monte Carlo simulation of a Multileaf Shielding (MLS) System designed to be used for the protection of patients who undergo radiotherapy treatment, against undesired exposure to neutrons produced in the components of the medical linear accelerator heads. The choice of radiotherapy equipment as the subject of study fell on the Varian Clinac 2,100/2,300 with MLC-120 operating at 18 MeV. The general purpose Monte Carlo N-Particle radiation transport code, MCNP5, was used in the computer simulation in order to determine the ambient dose equivalent, H (10), on several points on the patient's plane, with the equipment operation with and without the MLS. The results of the simulations showed a significant neutron dose reduction after the inclusion of the proposed shielding.