Search

Among blood cancers, multiple myeloma (MM) represents the second most common neoplasm and is characterized by the accumulation and proliferation of monoclonal plasma cells within the bone marrow. Despite the last few decades being characterized by the development of different therapeutic strategies against MM, at present such disease is still considered incurable. Although MM is highly heterogeneous in terms of genetic and molecular subtypes, about 67% of MM cases are associated with abnormal activity of the transcription factor c-Myc, which has so far revealed a protein extremely difficult to target. We have recently demonstrated that activation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling protects MM cells from oxidative stress-induced apoptosis by stabilizing the oncoprotein c-Myc. Accordingly, secretion of FGF ligands and autocrine activation of FGF receptors (FGFR) is observed in MM cells and FGFR3 genomic alterations represent some 15-20% MM cases and are associated with poor outcome. Thus, FGF/FGFR blockade may represent a promising strategy to indirectly target c-Myc in MM. On this basis, the present review aims at providing an overview of recently explored connections between the FGF/FGFR system and c-Myc oncoprotein, sustaining the therapeutic potential of targeting the FGF/FGFR/c-Myc axis in MM by using inhibitors targeting FGF ligands or FGF receptors. Importantly, the provided findings may represent the rationale for using FDA approved FGFR TK inhibitors (i.e. Pemigatinib, Futibatinib, Erdafitinib) for the treatment of MM patients presenting with an aberrant activation of this axis., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Futibatinib (Lytgobi ® Tablets 4 ‍mg), a novel fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor developed by Taiho Pharmaceutical using the Cysteinomix Drug Discovery Platform, was approved in Japan in June 2023 for the treatment of patients with unresectable biliary tract cancer with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement that had progressed after at least one prior chemotherapy. Futibatinib covalently binds to the cysteine residue in the FGFR kinase domain P-loop structure and is believed to exert antitumor activity by selectively and irreversibly inhibiting FGFR1-4. Many FGFR inhibitors under development are ATP-competitive; however, futibatinib is the first approved covalently-binding irreversible FGFR inhibitor. It inhibits cell proliferation by inhibiting FGFR phosphorylation and its downstream signaling pathways in cancer cell lines. Futibatinib showed inhibitory activity against a wider range of FGFR mutants than ATP-competitive, reversible FGFR inhibitors and inhibited cell proliferation without significantly deviating from the inhibitory effect on wild-type FGFR. Futibatinib showed antitumor efficacy in mice subcutaneously transplanted with human tumor cell lines driven by FGFR. The international phase 2 study (TAS-120-101) was conducted in patients with refractory intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with FGFR2 fusion or rearrangement. The overall response rate was 41.7%, showing consistent efficacy regardless of co-occurring genomic alterations. Although some typical FGFR inhibitor-related side effects were observed, they were manageable and futibatinib had a good safety profile. Futibatinib is an important drug for biliary tract cancer, which has limited treatment options; its development is underway for other types of cancer, and it is expected to benefit more patients.

In the phase II FUZE trial targeting the FGFR pathway, Debio 1347 showed limited antitumor activity and manageable toxicity in patients with advanced solid tumors. Results from transcriptome-based analysis enhanced our understanding of the genomic landscape of FGFR fusion-driven tumors, informing clinical trial design and generating hypotheses for resistance mechanisms. See related article by Grivas et al., p. 4572., (©2024 American Association for Cancer Research.)

Background: Patients with locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma face a poor prognosis. Standard first-line treatment involves platinum-based combinations followed by avelumab maintenance therapy. Follow-up therapies include enfortumab vedotin, vinflunine, and taxanes., Objective: To analyze new drug combinations in first-line and follow-up treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma concerning their clinical relevance, toxicities, and novel treatment sequences., Materials and Methods: Analysis of new study data from EV-302/KN-A39 (enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab) and CheckMate-901 (nivolumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin) for untreated metastatic patients as well as TROPHY-U-01 (sacituzumab govitecan) and THOR (erdafitinib) for later lines., Results: The new standard in first-line treatment for metastatic urothelial carcinoma is the combination of enfortumab vedotin and pembrolizumab. For cisplatin-eligible patients with contraindications to enfortumab vedotin, the combination of nivolumab and gemcitabine-cisplatin offers an alternative. Erdafitinib presents a new biomarker-based option in the follow-up treatment of metastatic urothelial carcinoma., Conclusion: These novel combinations are revolutionizing the treatment standard for metastatic urothelial carcinoma and necessitate a new approach to managing side effects., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Medizin Verlag GmbH, ein Teil von Springer Nature.)

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) are emerging as key factors involved in tumorigenesis, tumor microenvironment remodeling and acquired resistance to targeted therapies. Pemigatinib is a Tyrosine-Kinase Inhibitor that selectively targets aberrant FGFR1, FGFR2 and FGFR3. Pemigatinib is now approved for advanced-stage cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) but data suggests that other tumor histotypes exhibit FGFR alterations, thus hypothesizing its potential efficacy in other cancer settings. The present systematic review, based on PRISMA guidelines, aims to synthetize and critically interpret the results of all available preclinical and clinical evidence regarding Pemigatinib use in cancer. In April 2024, an extensive search was performed in PubMed, MEDLINE, and Scopus databases using the keyword "Pemigatinib". Twenty-seven studies finally met all inclusion criteria. The promising results emerging from Pemigatinib preclinical and clinical studies pave the way for Pemigatinib extension to multiple solid cancer settings., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None to declare., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Erdafitinib, an oral pan-FGFR inhibitor, is used in locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma for adults with FGFR3 genetic alterations and whose disease progressed following prior systemic therapy. This drug-drug interaction substudy evaluated the effect of erdafitinib on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam (cytochrome P450 3A4 substrate), and metformin (organic cation transporter 2 substrate). Twenty-five patients with advanced solid tumors harboring FGFR gene alterations received pretreatment with single doses of midazolam and metformin, followed by a daily dose of erdafitinib. Drug-drug interaction assessments were performed at erdafitinib steady state following coadministration of single doses of midazolam and metformin, respectively. Geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration and area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity were estimated using linear mixed-effects models (90% confidence interval within 80%-125% indicated no interaction). The 90% confidence intervals of geometric mean ratios for maximum plasma concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity of midazolam (86.3%, 88.5%, and 82.1%), 1-OH midazolam (99.8%, 97.4%, and 101.5%), and metformin (108.7%, 119.0%, and 113.9%) were either contained or slightly outside the 80%-125% interval and not considered clinically meaningful. Adverse events were consistent with the known erdafitinib safety profile; no new safety signals emerged. Thus, repeated dosing of erdafitinib had no clinically meaningful effect on the pharmacokinetics of midazolam or metformin., (© 2024 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Fibroblast Growth Receptor Factor (FGFR) are a family of proteins which are, in addition to their biological role, are involved in various pathological functions, such as cancer cellular proliferation, and metastasis. Deregulation of FGFRs at various points could result in malignancy. A conformational transition of the DFG (Asp-Phe-Gly) motif can switch the enzyme from a catalytically active (DFG-in) to an inactive (DFG-out) state. There are a few FDFR inhibitors which have received approval from the FDA, but these have adverse side effects. Hence, there is a demand for safer alternatives. With this aim, Ligand and Structure based virtual screening was carried to identify suitable lead molecule. In this process, Four Featured atom-based 3D Pharmacophore with quantitative structure-activity relationship analysis (3D-QSAR) was developed. The External validation of the hypothesis was carried invoking criteria such as Area under the ROC curve. Natural plant compound databases such as the Traditional Chinese medicine, NPACT and the ZINC Natural databases were chosen for pharmacophore filtering, which was followed by virtual screening against FGFR isoforms. The compound Sanggenol B was identified as the most suitable lead molecule. Structural stability of the protein-ligand complex and interactions of the ligand (Sanggenol B & the reference compound Ponatinib) with FGFR were analysed for 1000 ns (triplicate) by means of molecular simulation and the binding free energy was calculated using MMGBSA. Sanggenol B (PubChem CID: 15233694) binds effectively at the active site with favourable energies and is proposed as a safe alternative from a natural source.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

The standard of care for advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) was historically identified with platinum-based chemotherapy. Thanks to the advances in biological and genetic knowledge and technologies, new therapeutic agents have emerged in this setting recently: the immune checkpoint inhibitors and the fibroblast growth factor receptor inhibitors as the target therapy for patients harboring alterations in the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) pathway. However, chasing a tumor's tendency to recur and progress, a new class of agents has more recently entered the scene, with promising results. Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are in fact the latest addition, with enfortumab vedotin being the first to receive accelerated approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in December 2019, followed by sacituzumab govitecan. Many other ADCs are still under investigation. ADCs undoubtedly represent the new frontier, with the potential of transforming the management of mUC treatment in the future. Therefore, we reviewed the landscape of mUC treatment options, giving an insight into the molecular basis and mechanisms, and evaluating new therapeutic strategies in the perspective of more and more personalized treatments.

The aberrant activation of FGFRs plays a critical role in various cancers, leading to the development of several FGFR inhibitors in clinic. However, the emergence of drug resistance, primarily due to gatekeeper mutations in FGFRs, has limited their clinical efficacy. To address the unmet medical need, a series of 5-amino-1H-pyrazole-4-carboxamide derivatives were designed and synthesized as novel pan-FGFR covalent inhibitors targeting both wild-type and the gatekeeper mutants. The representative compound 10h demonstrated nanomolar activities against FGFR1, FGFR2, FGFR3 and FGFR2 V564F gatekeeper mutant in biochemical assays (IC 50  = 46, 41, 99, and 62 nM). Moreover, 10h also strongly suppressed the proliferation of NCI-H520 lung cancer cells, SNU-16 and KATO III gastric cancer cells with IC 50 values of 19, 59, and 73 nM, respectively. Further X-ray co-crystal structure revealed that 10h irreversibly binds to FGFR1. The study provides a new promising point for anticancer drug development medicated by FGFRs., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.)

Background: Inhibition of androgen receptor (AR) signaling is the main treatment strategy in advanced prostate cancer (PCa). A subset of castration resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) bypasses the AR blockade by increased fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling. The first- and second-generation, non-covalent FGFR inhibitors (FGFRis) have largely failed in the clinical trials against PCa., Purpose: In this study, we tested the drug sensitivity of LNCaP, VCaP, and CWR-R1PCa cell lines to second-generation, covalent FGFRis (FIIN1, FIIN2) and a novel FGFR downstream molecule inhibitor (FRS2αi)., Methods: 2D and 3D mono- and co-cultures of cancer cells, and cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) were used to mimic tumor-stroma interactions in the extracellular matrix (ECM). The treatment responses of the FGFR signaling molecules, the viability and proliferation of cancer cells, and CAFs were determined through immunoblotting, migration assay, cell viability assay, and real-time imaging. Immunofluorescent and confocal microscopy images of control and treated cultures of cancer cells and CAFs, and their morphometric data were deduced., Results: The FGFRis were more effective in mono-cultures of the cancer cells compared with co-cultures with CAFs. The FRS2αi was specifically effective in co-cultures with CAFs but was not cytotoxic to CAF mono-cultures as in the case of FIIN1 and FIIN2. At the molecular level, FRS2αi decreased p-FRS2α, p-ERK1/2, and activated apoptosis as monitored by cleaved caspase-3 activity in a concentration-dependent manner in the co-cultures. We observed no synergistic drug efficacy in the combination treatment of the FGFRi with ARi, enzalutamide, and darolutamide. The FRS2αi treatment led to a decrease in proliferation of cancer cell clusters in co-cultures as indicated by their reduced size and Ki67 expression., Conclusions: CAFs exert a protective effect on cancer cells and should be included in the in vitro models to make them physiologically more relevant in screening and testing of FGFRis. The FRS2αi was the most potent agent in reducing the viability and proliferation of the 3D organotypic co-cultures, mainly by disrupting the contact between CAFs and cancer cell clusters. The next-generation FGFRi, FRS2αi, may be a better alternative treatment option for overcoming ARi treatment resistance in advanced PCa., (© 2024 The Author(s). Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: FGFR genomic aberrations occur in approximately 5-10% of human cancers. Erdafitinib has previously demonstrated efficacy and safety in FGFR-altered advanced solid tumors, such as gliomas, thoracic, gastrointestinal, gynecological, and other rare cancers. However, its efficacy and safety in Asian patients remain largely unknown. We conducted a multicenter, open-label, single-arm phase IIa study of erdafitinib to evaluate its efficacy in Asian patients with FGFR-altered advanced cholangiocarcinoma, non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), and esophageal cancer., Methods: Patients with pathologically/cytologically confirmed, advanced, or refractory tumors who met molecular and study eligibility criteria received oral erdafitinib 8 mg once daily with an option for pharmacodynamically guided up-titration to 9 mg on a 28-day cycle, except for four NSCLC patients who received erdafitinib 10 mg (7 days on/7 days off) as they were recruited before the protocol amendment. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed objective response rate per RECIST v1.1. Secondary endpoints included progression-free survival, duration of response, disease control rate, overall survival, safety, and pharmacokinetics., Results: Thirty-five patients (cholangiocarcinoma: 22; NSCLC: 12; esophageal cancer: 1) were enrolled. At data cutoff (November 19, 2021), the objective response rate for patients with cholangiocarcinoma was 40.9% (95% CI, 20.7-63.6); the median progression-free survival was 5.6 months (95% CI, 3.6-12.7) and median overall survival was 40.2 months (95% CI, 12.4-not estimable). No patient with RET/FGFR-altered NSCLC achieved objective response and the disease control rate was 25.0% (95% CI, 5.5-57.2%), with three patients with stable disease. The single patient with esophageal cancer achieved partial response. All patients experienced treatment-emergent adverse events, and grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported in 22 (62.9%) patients. Hyperphosphatemia was the most frequently reported treatment-emergent adverse event (all-grade, 85.7%)., Conclusions: Erdafitinib demonstrated efficacy in a population of Asian patients in selected advanced solid tumors, particularly in those with advanced FGFR-altered cholangiocarcinoma. Treatment was tolerable with no new safety signals., Trial Registration: This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT02699606); study registration (first posted): 04/03/2016., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) act as proangiogenic and mitogenic cytokines in several cancers, including multiple myeloma (MM). Indeed, corrupted FGF autocrine and paracrine secretion induces an aberrant activation of the FGF receptor (FGFR) signaling sustaining cancer cell spreading and resistance to pharmacological treatments. Thus, FGF traps may represent a promising anti-cancer strategy to hamper the ligand-dependent activation of the FGF/FGFR system. We previously identified NSC12 as the first orally available small molecule FGF trap able to inhibit the growth and progression of several FGF-dependent tumor models. NSC12 is a pregnenolone derivative carrying a 1,1-bis-trifluoromethyl-1,3-propanediol chain in position 17 of the steroid nucleus. Investigation of structure-activity relationships (SARs) provided more potent and specific NSC12 steroid derivatives and highlighted that the C17-side chain is pivotal for the FGF trap activity. Here, a scaffold hopping approach allowed to obtain two FGF trap compounds (22 and 57) devoid of the steroid nucleus and able to efficiently bind FGF2 and to inhibit FGFR activation in MM cells. Accordingly, these compounds exert a potent anti-tumor activity on MM cell lines both in vitro and in vivo and on MM patient-derived primary cells, strongly affecting the survival of both proteasome-inhibitor sensitive and resistant MM cells. These results propose a new therapeutic option for relapsed/refractory MM patients and set the bases for the development of novel FGF traps prone to chemical diversification to be used in the clinic for the treatment of those tumors in which the FGF/FGFR system plays a pivotal role, including MM., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Erdafitinib, a selective and potent oral pan-FGFR inhibitor, is metabolized mainly through CYP2C9 and CYP3A4 enzymes. This phase 1, open-label, single-sequence, drug-drug interaction study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability of a single oral dose of erdafitinib alone and when co-administered with steady state oral carbamazepine, a dual inducer of CYP3A4 and CYP2C9, in 13 healthy adult participants (NCT04330248). Compared with erdafitinib administration alone, carbamazepine co-administration decreased total and free maximum plasma concentrations of erdafitinib (C max ) by 35% (95% CI 30%-39%) and 22% (95% CI 17%-27%), respectively. The areas under the concentration-time curve over the time interval from 0 to 168 hours, to the last quantifiable data point, and to time infinity (AUC 168h , AUC last , AUC inf ), were markedly decreased for both total erdafitinib (56%-62%) and free erdafitinib (48%-55%). The safety profile of erdafitinib was consistent with previous clinical studies in healthy participants, with no new safety concerns when administered with or without carbamazepine. Co-administration with carbamazepine may reduce the activity of erdafitinib due to reduced exposure. Concomitant use of strong CYP3A4 inducers with erdafitinib should be avoided., (© 2024 Janssen Research & Development, LLC. Clinical Pharmacology in Drug Development published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Aim: Neuroblastoma (NB) is, in spite of current intensive therapy with severe side effects, still not cured so new therapies are needed. Recently, we showed combining phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K) (BYL719), fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) (JNJ-42756493) and cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 (CDK4/6) (PD-0332991) inhibitors, in vitro in NB cell lines grown as monolayers had synergistic effects. However, there were variations depending on the combinations used and the targeted NB cell lines. To obtain further information and to mimic more natural circumstances, we investigated the effects of single and combined administrations of the above inhibitors in spheroid NB-cultures., Material and Methods: Spheroid cultures of NB cell lines SK-N-AS, SK-N-BE(2)-C, SK-N-FI and SK-N-SH were established and treated with single and combined administrations of BYL719, JNJ-42756493, and PD-0332991 and followed for growth, viability, proliferation, cytotoxicity and migration., Key Findings: Single inhibitor administrations gave dose dependent responses with regard to growth and viability and their combinations were efficient and resulted in a range of additive and synergistic effects. The responses to individual drugs and their various combinations were predominantly alike regardless of whether the cells were cultivated in monolayer or D spheroid NB models. However, in general, slightly higher drug concentrations were necessary in spheroidcultures., Significance: This study provides pre-clinical evidence that single PI3K, FGFR, and CDK4/6, inhibitors exhibit promising anti-NB activity and when combined lower doses of the drugs could be also used in spheroid NB-cultures, supporting the pursuit of further in vitro and in vivo studies in preparation for future potential clinical use., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Masson SAS.. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors are the leading approaches in tumor immunotherapy. The aim of the study was to establish recommended phase 2 doses (RP2Ds) of intravenous cetrelimab, a checkpoint inhibitor, alone and with oral erdafitinib in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. This open-label, non-randomized, dose-escalation phase 1/1b study enrolled adults with advanced solid tumors who were ineligible for standard therapy. Study was conducted in two parts: phase 1a assessed cetrelimab at three dosing levels (80 mg every 2 weeks [Q2W], 240 mg Q2W, and 480 mg Q4W); phase 1b assessed cetrelimab+erdafitinib at two dosing levels (240 mg Q2W + 6 mg once daily [QD] and 240 mg Q2W + 8 mg QD). Primary endpoint was frequency and severity of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of cetrelimab ± erdafitinib. In total 22 patients (phase 1a, n = 9; phase 1b, n = 13) were enrolled. Median duration of follow-up was 8.64 months in phase 1a and 2.33 months in phase 1b. In phase 1a, DLTs weren't reported while in phase 1b, 1 patient who received 240 mg cetrelimab + 6 mg erdafitinib reported Stevens-Johnson syndrome (grade 3, immune-related). Overall, 88.9% patients in phase 1a (grade ≥ 3: 44.4%) and 100.0% in phase 1b (grade ≥ 3: 53.8%) experienced ≥ 1 treatment-related adverse events (TEAEs); 33.3% in phase 1a and 38.5% in phase 1b reported serious TEAEs, of which 11.1% patients in phase 1a and 15.4% in phase 1b had TEAEs which led to treatment discontinuation. Cetrelimab alone and in combination with erdafitinib showed manageable safety in Japanese patients with advanced solid tumors. RP2Ds were determined as 480 mg cetrelimab Q4W for monotherapy, and cetrelimab 240 mg Q2W + erdafitinib 8 mg QD for combination therapy., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Anti-FGFR treatment for cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) with fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alteration is a promising treatment option. Since the antitumor mechanisms of anti-FGFR inhibitors and conventional cytotoxic drugs differ, synergistic effects can be possible. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy of the combined administration of gemcitabine (GEM) and pemigatinib in CCA cells with FGFR2 alterations. To simulate the treatment for patients with 3 kinds of CCA, chemonaïve CCA with activation of the FGF pathway, chemo-resistant CCA with activation of the FGF pathway, and CCA without FGF pathway activation (as controls), we evaluated 3 different CCA cell lines, CCLP-1 (with a FGFR2 fusion mutation), CCLP-GR (GEM-resistant cells established from CCLP-1), and HuCCT1 (without FGFR mutations). There was no significant difference between CCLP-1 and HuCCT1 in GEM suspensibility (IC50 = 19.3, 22.6 mg/dl, p = 0.1187), and the drug sensitivity to pemigatinib did not differ between CCLP-1 and CCLP-GR (IC50 = 7.18,7.60 nM, p = 0.3089). Interestingly, only CCLP-1 showed a synergistic effect with combination therapy consisting of GEM plus pemigatinib in vitro and in vivo. In a comparison of the reaction to GEM exposure, only CCLP-1 cells showed an increase in the activation of downstream proteins in the FGF pathway, especially FRS2 and ERK. In association with this reaction, cell cycle and mitosis were increased with GEM exposure in CCLP-1, but HuCCT1/CCLP-GR did not show this reaction. Our results suggested that combination therapy with GEM plus pemigatinib is a promising treatment for chemonaïve patients with CCA with activation of the FGF pathway., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Background: Pemigatinib is an oral, potent, selective fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 1-3 inhibitor. FIGHT-101, a three-part, open-label, first-in-human, phase I/II study (NCT02393248), evaluated pemigatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors. In parts 1 and 2, pemigatinib monotherapy had a manageable safety profile and antitumor activity in FGFR-altered tumors. Part 3 (pemigatinib combination therapies) results are presented here., Patients and Methods: Patients received 9, 13.5, or 20 mg oral once-daily pemigatinib on continuous or intermittent schedules with gemcitabine and cisplatin (pemi/gem/cis), docetaxel (pemi/doc), trastuzumab (pemi/tras), pembrolizumab (pemi/pembro), or retifanlimab (pemi/reti) irrespective of whether the tumor was confirmed as FGFR altered. Primary endpoints were safety and pharmacodynamics. Secondary endpoints were investigator-assessed tumor objective response rates (ORRs) and pharmacokinetics (PK)., Results: Of 65 enrolled patients (pemi/gem/cis, n = 8; pemi/doc, n = 7; pemi/tras, n = 6; pemi/pembro, n = 26; pemi/reti, n = 18), all discontinued. Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were generally consistent with individual drug AEs. Serious and grade ≥3 TEAEs occurred in 0%-85.7% and 33.3%-100.0% of patients across treatment groups, respectively. All pemigatinib combinations demonstrated steady-state PK comparable to monotherapy. Pharmacodynamic effects in all pemigatinib combinations, except pemi/gem/cis, were consistent with monotherapy. Less inhibition of FGFR2α phosphorylation was observed with this combination. ORRs (95% confidence interval) were 37.5% [8.5% to 75.5% (pemi/gem/cis)], 14.3% [0.4% to 57.9% (pemi/doc)], 0% (pemi/tras), 26.9% [11.6% to 47.8% (pemi/pembro)], and 11.1% [1.4% to 34.7% (pemi/reti)]. All groups had instances of tumor shrinkage. ORRs in assessable patients with FGFR rearrangements and mutations were 50% and 33%, respectively., Conclusions: Pemigatinib combination therapy showed no unexpected toxicities. PK and pharmacodynamics were mostly consistent with pemigatinib monotherapy. Pemi/gem/cis (37.5%) and pemi/pembro (26.9%) had the highest ORR; most responders had FGFR alterations., Competing Interests: Disclosure VS reports scientific advisory board participation for Relay Therapeutics, Incyte, Novartis, Eli Lilly/Loxo Oncology, Roche, Pfizer, Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Bayer, AbbVie, Regeneron, Novartis, Clinical Care Communications, Invited Speaker. KPP reports consulting or advisory roles for Basilea and Turning Point Therapeutics and research funding paid to the institution from 3D Medicines, AbbVie, ADC Therapeutics, Amgen, Anheart Therapeutics, Bayer, Calithera Biosciences, Daiichi Sankyo, EMD Serono, F-star, Incyte, Jounce Therapeutics, Lilly, Linnaeus Therapeutics, MabSpace Biosciences, MedImmune, Merck, Mersana, Mirati Therapeutics, Peloton Therapeutics, Pfizer, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Syros Pharmaceuticals, Tempest Therapeutics, and Treadwell Therapeutics. DM received consulting fees from AbbVie, Arcus, Lilly, and Mirati. Research grants or funds were received from AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Epicentrx, Incyte, Lilly, Merck, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Surface, and Y-mabs. NBM received research funding paid directly to the institution from Actuate Therapeutics, Amphivena Therapeutics, Aravive Inc., AstraZeneca, BioMed Valley Discoveries, Compass Therapeutics, Erytech Pharma, Genentech, Incyte, Leap Therapeutics, Merck Sharp and Dohme, Mereo BioPharma Group, NuCana, Repare Therapeutics, and Syros Pharmaceuticals. IS received research funding paid directly to the institution from Alligator Bioscience, AstraZeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Cantargia AB, Genentech, Genmab, Incyte, Loxo/Bayer, Loxo/Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Orion, Roche, Pfizer, Puma Biotechnology, and Symphogen; and support for attending meetings and/or travel expenses from AstraZeneca, Incyte, Merck, and Pfizer. MLV and CT are employees and shareholders of Incyte. IMS was an employee of Incyte at the time of the study. MG is a speaker for Guardant and a consultant for Cellularity, Merck, and Sanofi. All other authors have declared no conflicts of interest., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are essential for urothelial carcinoma (UC) treatment. Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations, as common oncogenic drivers in UC, have been reported to drive T cell depletion of UC immune microenvironment via up-regulating FGFR signaling, which indicated FGFR alterations potentially result in reduced response to ICIs. In addition, the selective pan-FGFR inhibitor showed better clinical benefit in clinical trials, indicating FGFR has emerged as critical therapeutic target via inhibiting FGFR signaling. The present study aims to evaluate prognosis and response to ICIs between FGFR-altered UC patients and FGFR-wildtype UC patients via 1963 UC patients and offers new insights into personalized precision therapy and combination therapy for UC., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest None., (Copyright © 2024. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

Purpose of Review: This review is timely and relevant due to the increasing recognition of the significance of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family in cancer biology. Understanding the role of FGFRs and their dysregulation in various cancers is crucial for developing targeted therapies and improving patient outcomes., Recent Findings: The review highlights the importance of the FGFR family in cellular processes such as growth, proliferation, and survival. It discusses how abnormalities in FGFR2, including overexpression, gene amplification, and other genetic alterations, contribute to cancer progression, particularly in gastro-intestinal cancers. The paper also emphasizes the promising results of FGFR-targeted therapies, especially tyrosine kinase inhibitors, in certain cancers such as cholangiocarcinoma and oesophagogastric cancers., Summary: The findings underscore the potential of FGFR-targeted therapies in treating cancers with FGFR dysregulation. However, the review also addresses the challenges associated with these therapies, including toxicities and mechanisms of resistance. Understanding these complexities is essential for optimizing the efficacy of FGFR-targeted treatments and improving patient outcomes in clinical practice and research efforts., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

The FGFR signaling pathway is integral to cellular activities, including proliferation, differentiation, and survival. Dysregulation of this pathway is implicated in numerous human cancers, positioning FGFR as a prominent therapeutic target. Here, we conduct a comprehensive review of the function, signaling pathways and abnormal alterations of FGFR, as well as its role in tumorigenesis and development. Additionally, we provide an in-depth analysis of pivotal phase 2 and 3 clinical trials evaluating the performance and safety of FGFR inhibitors in oncology, thereby shedding light on the current state of clinical research in this field. Then, we highlight four drugs that have been approved for marketing by the FDA, offering insights into their molecular mechanisms and clinical achievements. Our discussion encompasses the intricate landscape of FGFR-driven tumorigenesis, current techniques for pinpointing FGFR anomalies, and clinical experiences with FGFR inhibitor regimens. Furthermore, we discuss the inherent challenges of targeting the FGFR pathway, encompassing resistance mechanisms such as activation by gatekeeper mutations, alternative pathways, and potential adverse reactions. By synthesizing the current evidence, we underscore the potential of FGFR-centric therapies to enhance patient prognosis, while emphasizing the imperative need for continued research to surmount resistance and optimize treatment modalities., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

This review article explores the intricate correlation between growth factors and bone metastases, which play a crucial role in the development of several types of malignancies, namely breast, prostate, lung, and renal cancers. The focal point of our discussion is on crucial receptors for growth factors, including Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR), Transforming Growth Factor-β (TGFβ), Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Receptor (VEGFR), and Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR). These receptors, which are essential for cellular activities including growth, differentiation, and survival, have important involvement in the spread of cancer and the interactions between tumors and the bone environment. We discuss the underlying mechanisms of bone metastases, with a specific emphasis on the interaction between growth factor receptors and the bone microenvironment. EGFR signaling specifically enhances the process of osteoclast development and the formation of osteolytic lesions, especially in breast and lung malignancies. TGFβ receptors have a role in both osteolytic and osteoblastic metastases by releasing TGFβ, which attracts cancer cells and promotes bone remodeling. This is a crucial element in the spread of prostate cancer to the bones. The functions of FGFR and VEGFR in the processes of bone formation and tumor angiogenesis, respectively, highlight the complex and diverse nature of these interactions. The review emphasizes the possibility of targeted therapeutics targeting these receptors to interrupt the cycle of tumor development and bone degradation. Therapeutic approaches include focusing on the VEGF/VEGFR, EGF/EGFR, FGF/FGFR, and TGFβ/TGFβR pathways. These include a variety of compounds, such as small molecule inhibitors and monoclonal antibodies, which have shown potential to interfere with tumor-induced alterations in bone. The text discusses clinical trials and preclinical models, offering insights into the effectiveness and constraints of various treatments. Ultimately, this study provides a succinct but thorough summary of the present knowledge and treatment strategies focused on growth factor receptors in bone metastases. This highlights the significance of comprehending the signaling of growth factor receptors in the microenvironment where tumors spread to the bones, as well as the possibility of using targeted therapies to enhance the results for cancer patients with bone metastases. The advancement of treating bone metastases hinges on the development of treatments that specifically target the intricate relationships between malignancies and bone., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (© 2024 The Author(s). Published by IMR Press.)

Dysregulation of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) signaling has been associated with breast cancer, yet employing FGFR-targeted delivery systems to improve the efficacy of cytotoxic agents is still sparsely exploited. Herein, we report four new bi-functional ruthenium-peptide conjugates (RuPCs) with FGFR-targeting and pH-dependent releasing abilities, envisioning the selective delivery of cytotoxic Ru complexes to FGFR(+)-breast cancer cells, and controlled activation at the acidic tumoral microenvironment. The antiproliferative potential of the RuPCs and free Ru complexes was evaluated in four breast cancer cell lines with different FGFR expression levels (SKBR-3, MDA-MB-134-VI, MCF-7, and MDA-MB-231) and in human dermal fibroblasts (HDF), at pH 6.8 and pH 7.4 aimed at mimicking the tumor microenvironment and normal tissues/bloodstream pHs, respectively. The RuPCs showed higher cytotoxicity in cells with higher level of FGFR expression at acidic pH. Additionally, RuPCs showed up to 6-fold higher activity in the FGFR(+) breast cancer lines compared to the normal cell line. The release profile of Ru complexes from RuPCs corroborates the antiproliferative effects observed. Remarkably, the cytotoxicity and releasing ability of RuPCs were shown to be strongly dependent on the conjugation of the peptide position in the Ru complex. Complementary molecular dynamic simulations and computational calculations were performed to help interpret these findings at the molecular level. In summary, we identified a lead bi-functional RuPC that holds strong potential as a FGFR-targeted chemotherapeutic agent.

As our grasp of cancer genomics deepens, we are steadily progressing towards the domain of precision medicine, where targeted therapy stands out as a revolutionary breakthrough in the landscape of cancer therapeutics. The fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) pathway has been unveiled as a fundamental instigator in the pathophysiological mechanisms underlying breast carcinoma, paving the way for the exhilarating development of precision-targeted therapeutics. In the pursuit of exploring inhibitors that specifically target the FGFR signaling pathways, a multitude of kinase inhibitors targeting FGFR has been assiduously engineered to address the heterogeneous landscape of human malignancies. This review offers an exhaustive exploration of aberrations within the FGFR pathway and their functional implications in breast cancer. Additionally, we delve into cutting-edge therapeutic approaches for the treatment of breast cancer patients bearing FGFR alterations and the management of toxicity associated with FGFR inhibitors. Furthermore, our contemplation of the evolution of cutting-edge FGFR inhibitors foresees their potential to spearhead innovative therapeutic approaches in the ongoing combat against cancer., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Purpose: To report a case of Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor inhibitor (FGFRi) associated retinopathy in a patient treated with Erdafitinib., Case Report: A patient with a history of non-muscle invasive urothelial carcinoma treated with Erdafitinib developed symptomatic unifocal bilateral serous retinal detachments (SRD) eight weeks after starting this new treatment. Six months after discontinuing the drug, the SRDs resolved and visual acuity recovered to baseline. However, hyper and hypo auto fluorescent lesions were still visible on fundus autofluorescence, suggesting a still ongoing retinal pigment epithelium (RPE) impairment., Conclusions: Cancer treatments using FGFRi are showing promising results but their ocular toxicity is not well reported nor fully understood. Oncologists should be aware of the potential risks associated with FGFRi and involve ophthalmologists for the follow-up of their patients. The toxicity of FGFRi seems to resolve after drug continuation, but a certain degree of infra clinical RPE impairment may persist. Longer term follow-ups are warranted to further understand the effects of FGFRi on the RPE., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe authors declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

The clinical management of metastatic urothelial carcinoma (mUC) is undergoing a major paradigm shift; the integration of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) and antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) into the mUC therapeutic strategy has succeeded in improving platinum-based chemotherapy outcomes. Given the expanding therapeutic armamentarium, it is crucial to identify efficacy-predictive biomarkers that can guide an individual patient's therapeutic strategy. We reviewed the literature data on mUC genomic alterations of clinical interest, discussing their prognostic and predictive role. In particular, we explored the role of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family, epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2), mechanistic target of rapamycin (mTOR) axis, DNA repair genes, and microsatellite instability. Currently, based on the available clinical data, FGFR inhibitors and HER2-directed ADCs are effective therapeutic options for later lines of biomarker-driven mUC. However, emerging genomic data highlight the opportunity for earlier use and/or combination with other drugs of both FGFR inhibitors and HER2-directed ADCs and also reveal additional potential drug targets that could change mUC management.

Background: Erdafitinib is a pan-fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor approved for the treatment of locally advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma in adults with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who have progression after platinum-containing chemotherapy. The effects of erdafitinib in patients with FGFR -altered metastatic urothelial carcinoma who have progression during or after treatment with checkpoint inhibitors (anti-programmed cell death protein 1 [PD-1] or anti-programmed death ligand 1 [PD-L1] agents) are unclear., Methods: We conducted a global phase 3 trial of erdafitinib as compared with chemotherapy in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma with susceptible FGFR3/2 alterations who had progression after one or two previous treatments that included an anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to receive erdafitinib or the investigator's choice of chemotherapy (docetaxel or vinflunine). The primary end point was overall survival., Results: A total of 266 patients underwent randomization: 136 to the erdafitinib group and 130 to the chemotherapy group. The median follow-up was 15.9 months. The median overall survival was significantly longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (12.1 months vs. 7.8 months; hazard ratio for death, 0.64; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.47 to 0.88; P = 0.005). The median progression-free survival was also longer with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (5.6 months vs. 2.7 months; hazard ratio for progression or death, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.44 to 0.78; P<0.001). The incidence of grade 3 or 4 treatment-related adverse events was similar in the two groups (45.9% in the erdafitinib group and 46.4% in the chemotherapy group). Treatment-related adverse events that led to death were less common with erdafitinib than with chemotherapy (in 0.7% vs. 5.4% of patients)., Conclusions: Erdafitinib therapy resulted in significantly longer overall survival than chemotherapy among patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma and FGFR alterations after previous anti-PD-1 or anti-PD-L1 treatment. (Funded by Janssen Research and Development; THOR ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT03390504.)., (Copyright © 2023 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

The aberrant activation of the fibroblast growth factor 2 (FGF2)/fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signalling pathway drives severe pathologies, including cancer development and angiogenesis-driven pathologies. The perturbation of the FGF2/FGFR axis via extracellular allosteric small inhibitors is a promising strategy for developing FGFR inhibitors with improved safety and efficacy for cancer treatment. We have previously investigated the role of new extracellular inhibitors, such as rosmarinic acid (RA), which bind the FGFR-D2 domain and directly compete with FGF2 for the same binding site, enabling the disruption of the functional FGF2/FGFR interaction. To select ligands for the previously identified FGF2/FGFR RA binding site, NMR data-driven virtual screening has been performed on an in-house library of non-commercial small molecules and metabolites. A novel drug-like compound, a resorcinol derivative named RBA4 has been identified. NMR interaction studies demonstrate that RBA4 binds the FGF2/FGFR complex, in agreement with docking prediction. Residue-level NMR perturbations analysis highlights that the mode of action of RBA4 is similar to RA in terms of its ability to target the FGF2/FGFR-D2 complex, inducing perturbations on both proteins and triggering complex dissociation. Biological assays proved that RBA4 inhibited FGF2 proliferative activity at a level comparable to the previously reported natural product, RA. Identification of RBA4 chemical groups involved in direct interactions represents a starting point for further optimization of drug-like extracellular inhibitors with improved activity., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper: [Collina Simona reports financial support was provided by University of Pavia.]., (Copyright © 2023 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

The specific inhibition of aberrant Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptors (FGFRs) has been identified as a feasible strategy to therapeutically ameliorate their respective carcinogenic involvements. High homology among these proteins has however limited efforts towards the discovery of selective small-molecule compounds due to undesirable effects elicited by pan-FGFR inhibitors. A recent study showed the selective activity of a new compound C11 which was >52 times more potent against FGFR1 than FGFR2 and FGFR3, and 4 times than FGFR4. This C11 selective non-covalency was investigated in this study using computational methods since it has remained unresolved. Structural findings revealed that C11 enhanced structural perturbations in FGFR1 with less prominent effects in other FGFRs. High deviations also characterized the C11 -bound active pocket of FGFR1 with notable fluctuations across the constituent P-loop, αC helix, hinge region, catalytic, and activation loops. These induced motions were essential for optimal C11 motion an d positioning of its phenalenone ring and prop-2-en-l-yl moiety at the FGFR1 active pocket to interact stably and strongly with A564 FGFR1 , L484 FGFR1 , Y563 FGFR1 , and E562 FGFR1 which as well had high energy contributions. C11 exhibited highly unstable binding in F GFRs2-3 with a more steady interaction with FGFR4. Free binding energy ( ΔG bind ) analyses further estimated the highest interaction energy for C11 -FGFR1 with favorable desolvation energy that indicated a deep hydrophobic pocket binding for C11 in FGFR1 compared to other FGFRs. We believe rational insights from this study will contribute to the structure-based design of highly specific FGFR1 inhibitors.Communicated by Ramaswamy H. Sarma.

Derazantinib (DZB) is an inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-3 (FGFR1-3), with additional activity against colony-stimulating-factor-1 receptor (CSF1R). We have profiled the activity of DZB in gastric cancer (GC) as monotherapy and combined with paclitaxel, and explored means of stratifying patients for treatment. The antiproliferative potency of DZB in vitro was quantified in 90 tumor cell lines and shown to correlate significantly with FGFR expression (<0.01) but not with FGFR DNA copy-number (CN) or FGFR mutations. In four GC cell lines in vitro , little or no synergy was observed with paclitaxel. In athymic nude mice, bearing cell-line derived xenografts (CDX) or patient-derived xenograft (PDX) GC models, DZB efficacy correlated highly significantly with FGFR gene expression ( r2 = 0.58; P = 0.0003; n = 18), but not FGFR mutations or DNA-CN. In FGFR-driven GC models, DZB had comparable efficacy to three other FGFR inhibitors and was more efficacious than paclitaxel. DZB had dose-dependent plasma pharmacokinetics but showed low brain penetration at all doses. GC models (one CDX and six PDX) were tested for sensitivity to the combination of DZB and paclitaxel and characterized by immunohistochemistry. The combination showed synergy (5) or additivity (2), and no antagonism, with synergy significantly associated ( P < 0.05) with higher levels of M2-type macrophages. The association of strong efficacy of the combination in vivo with M2 macrophages, which are known to express CSF1R, and the absence of synergy in vitro is consistent with the tumor microenvironment also being a factor in DZB efficacy and suggests additional means by which DZB could be stratified for cancer treatment in the clinic., (Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an uncommon malignancy originating from epithelial cells of the biliary tract. Regardless of the site of origin within the biliary tree, CCAs are generally aggressive with a poor survival. Surgical resection remains the only chance for cure, yet a majority of patients are not surgical candidates at presentation. Unfortunately, systemic therapies are often ineffective and complicated by side effects. As such, more effective targeted therapies are required in order to improve survival., Area Covered: Genetic analysis of CCA has allowed for a better understanding of the genomic landscape of CCA. Isocitrate dehydrogenase ( IDH ) and fibroblast growth factor receptor ( FGFR ) mutations have emerged as the most promising molecular targets for CCA. Inhibitors of IDH and FGFR have proven to have therapeutic benefit with an acceptable safety profile. However, patients often develop resistance rendering the therapy ineffective., Expert Opinion: Understanding the molecular pathways of IDH and FGFR may lead to a better understanding of the mechanisms of resistance. Thus, novel therapies may be developed to improve the efficacy of these therapies. Developing novel biomarkers may improve patient selection and further enhance effectiveness of targeted therapies.

Upregulation of the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathway has been implicated in multiple cancer types, including cholangiocarcinoma and bladder cancer. Consequently, small molecule inhibition of FGFR has emerged as a promising therapy for patients suffering from these diseases. First-generation pan-FGFR inhibitors, while highly effective, suffer from several drawbacks. These include treatment-related hyperphosphatemia and significant loss of potency for the mutant kinases. Herein, we present the discovery and optimization of novel FGFR2/3 inhibitors that largely maintain potency for the common gatekeeper mutants and have excellent selectivity over FGFR1. A combination of meticulous structure-activity relationship (SAR) analysis, structure-based drug design, and medicinal chemistry rationale ultimately led to compound 29 , a potent and selective FGFR2/3 inhibitor with excellent in vitro absorption, distribution, metabolism, excretion (ADME), and pharmacokinetics in rat. A pharmacodynamic study of a closely related compound established that maximum inhibition of downstream ERK phosphorylation could be achieved with no significant effect on serum phosphate levels relative to vehicle.

Metastatic urothelial cancer is a lethal disease. Although recent advances in immunotherapies and targeted therapy against fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)2/3 mutation (erdafitinib) have improved patient survival, there is still a critical need for novel therapeutic strategies for patients who do not benefit from these treatments. Evasion of apoptosis through amplifying anti-apoptotic Bcl-2 family proteins (Mcl-1, Bcl-xL, Bcl-2) is one mechanism responsible for treatment resistance in urothelial cancers, suggesting that targeting anti-apoptotic proteins may be a possible therapeutic strategy for urothelial cancers. Here, we showed that erdafitinib increased Mcl-1 degradation mainly through previously unknown mechanisms and synergized with a BH3 mimetic drug targeting Bcl-xL/Bcl-2 to induce apoptosis in FGFR wild-type urothelial cancer cells. Strikingly, clinical sequencing data showed amplification of MCL1 or BCL2L1 (encoding Bcl-xL) in subsets of FGFR mutation-negative bladder cancer tissues. In conclusion, these findings suggest that exploiting apoptosis pathways may be a promising treatment strategy for patients with FGFR wild-type metastatic urothelial cancer with Mcl-1 or Bcl-xL overexpression., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Background: Since T cell exclusion contributes to tumor immune evasion and immunotherapy resistance, how to improve T cell infiltration into solid tumors becomes an urgent challenge. Methods: We employed deep learning to profile the tumor immune microenvironment (TIME) in triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) samples from TCGA datasets and noticed that fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) signaling pathways were enriched in the immune-excluded phenotype of TNBC. Erdafitinib, a selective FGFR inhibitor, was then used to investigate the effect of FGFR blockade on TIME landscape of TNBC syngeneic mouse models by flow cytometry, mass cytometry (CyTOF) and RNA sequencing. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and transwell migration assay were carried out to detect the effect of FGFR blockade on cell proliferation and migration, respectively. Cytokine array, western blot, enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA) and immunofluorescence (IF) were employed to investigate the potential mechanism by which FGFR inhibition enhanced T cell infiltration. Results: Blocking FGFR pathway by Erdafitinib markedly suppressed tumor growth with increased T cell infiltration in immunocompetent mouse models of TNBC. Mechanistically, FGFR blockade inhibited cancer-associated fibroblasts (CAFs) proliferation, migration and secretion of vascular cell adhesion molecule 1 (VCAM-1) by down-regulating MAPK/ERK pathway in CAFs, thus promoting T cell infiltration by breaking physical and chemical barriers built by CAFs in TIME. Furthermore, we observed that FGFR inhibition combined with immune checkpoint blockade therapy (ICT) greatly improved the therapeutic response of TNBC tumor models. Conclusions: FGFR blockade enhanced ICT response by turning immune "cold" tumor into "hot" tumor, providing remarkable implications of FGFR inhibitors as adjuvant agents for combinatorial immunotherapy., Competing Interests: Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists., (© The author(s).)

Background: Angiogenesis has an important role in thymic epithelial tumors (TETs). Regorafenib inhibits vascular endothelial growth factor receptors (VEGFRs), platelet-derived growth factor receptor β (PDGFR-β), and fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs). This study explored the activity of regorafenib as monotherapy in patients with advanced or recurrent B2-B3 thymoma (T) and thymic carcinoma (TC) previously treated with platinum-containing chemotherapy., Methods: A Fleming single-arm, single-stage, phase 2 trial to evaluate the activity of regorafenib (160 mg once a day by mouth for 3 weeks on/1 week off) was planned. The study was designed to reject the null hypothesis of an 8-week progression-free survival (PFS) rate ≤25% with a type I error of 0.10 and a statistical power of 80% at the alternative hypothesis of an 8-week PFS rate of ≥50% (≥8 of 19 evaluable patients progression-free at 2 months)., Results: From June 2016 to November 2017, 19 patients were enrolled (11T/8TC). We observed partial response (PR) in 1 patient (1T) (5.3%), stable disease (SD) in 14 patients (9T/5TC) (73.7%), and progressive disease in 2 patients (1T/1TC) (10.5%), with a disease control rate of 78.9%. According to Choi-criteria, 13 patients (68.4%) achieved PR, and 2 patients SD (10.5%). The median PFS was 9.6 months whereas median overall survival was 33.8 months. The 8-week PFS rate was 78.9% (15 of 19 patients). Grade 3-4 treatment-related adverse events were observed in 10 patients (52.6%)., Conclusions: The primary end point of this study was reached. The high rate of PR (Choi-criteria) suggests antitumor activity of regorafenib in TETs. On the basis of survival outcomes, the efficacy of regorafenib should be further evaluated in larger studies., (© 2021 American Cancer Society.)

Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) signalling plays a critical role in breast embryonal development, tissue homeostasis, tumorigenesis and metastasis. FGFR, its numerous FGF ligands and signalling partners are often dysregulated in breast cancer progression and are one of the causes of resistance to treatment in breast cancer. Furthermore, FGFR signalling on epithelial cells is affected by signals from the breast microenvironment, therefore increasing the possibility of breast developmental abnormalities or cancer progression. Increasing our understanding of the multi-layered roles of the complex family of FGFRs, their ligands FGFs and their regulatory partners may offer novel treatment strategies for breast cancer patients, as a single agent or rational co-target, which will be explored in depth in this review.

Luminal breast cancer (BrCa) has a favorable prognosis compared with other tumor subtypes. However, with time, tumors may evolve and lead to disease progression; thus, there is a great interest in unraveling the mechanisms that drive tumor metastasis and endocrine resistance. In this review, we focus on one of the many pathways that have been involved in tumor progression, the fibroblast growth factor/fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) axis. We emphasize in data obtained from in vivo experimental models that we believe that in luminal BrCa, tumor growth relies in a crosstalk with the stromal tissue. We revisited the studies that illustrate the interaction between hormone receptors and FGFR. We also highlight the most frequent alterations found in BrCa cell lines and provide a short review on the trials that use FGFR inhibitors in combination with endocrine therapies. Analysis of these data suggests there are many players involved in this pathway that might be also targeted to decrease FGF signaling, in addition to specific FGFR inhibitors that may be exploited to increase their efficacy., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Endocrine Society. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Combination therapies consisting of immune checkpoint inhibitors plus anti-VEGF therapy show enhanced antitumor activity and are approved treatments for patients with renal cell carcinoma (RCC). The immunosuppressive roles of VEGF in the tumor microenvironment are well studied, but those of FGF/FGFR signaling remain largely unknown. Lenvatinib is a receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitor that targets both VEGFR and FGFR. Here, we examine the antitumor activity of anti-PD-1 mAb combined with either lenvatinib or axitinib, a VEGFR-selective inhibitor, in RCC. Both combination treatments showed greater antitumor activity and longer survival in mouse models versus either single agent treatment, whereas anti-PD-1 mAb plus lenvatinib had enhanced antitumor activity compared with anti-PD-1 mAb plus axitinib. Flow cytometry analysis showed that lenvatinib decreased the population of tumor-associated macrophages and increased that of IFNγ-positive CD8 + T cells. Activation of FGFR signaling inhibited the IFNγ-stimulated JAK/STAT signaling pathway and decreased expression of its target genes, including B2M , CXCL10 , and PD-L1 . Furthermore, inhibition of FGFR signaling by lenvatinib restored the tumor response to IFNγ stimulation in mouse and human RCC cell lines. These preclinical results reveal novel roles of tumor FGFR signaling in the regulation of cancer immunity through inhibition of the IFNγ pathway, and the inhibitory activity of lenvatinib against FGFRs likely contributes to the enhanced antitumor activity of combination treatment comprising lenvatinib plus anti-PD-1 mAb. SIGNIFICANCE: FGFR pathway activation inhibits IFNγ signaling in tumor cells, and FGFR inhibition with lenvatinib enhances antitumor immunity and the activity of anti-PD-1 antibodies., (©2021 The Authors; Published by the American Association for Cancer Research.)

The molecular mechanisms of mitotic cell cycle progression involve very tightly restricted types of machinery which are highly regulated by a fine balance between the positive and negative accelerators (or regulators). These regulators include several checkpoints that have proteins acting as enzymes and their activating partners. These checkpoints incessantly monitor the external as well as internal environments such as growth signals, favorable conditions for growth, cell size, DNA integrity of the cell and hence function to maintain the highly ordered cell cycle progression by sustaining cell homeostasis and promoting error-free DNA replication and cell cycle division. To progress through the mitotic cell cycle, the cell has to successfully drive past the cell cycle checkpoints. Due to the abnormal behavior of some cell cycle proteins, the cells tend to divide continuously overcoming the tight regulation of cell cycle checkpoints. Such anomalies may lead to unwanted cell division, and this deregulation of cell cycle events is considered as one of the main reasons behind tumor development, and thus, cancer progression. So the understanding of the molecular mechanisms in cancer progression might be insightful for designing several cancer treatment strategies. The deregulation in the checkpoints is caused due to the changes in the tyrosine residues of TPKs via PDGFR, EGFR, FGFR, and VEGFR-mediated signaling pathways. Therefore, the inhibitors of PDGFR, EGFR, FGFR, and VEGFR-mediated signaling pathways could be potential anticancer agents. The resistance and toxicity in the existing synthetic anticancer chemotherapeutics may decrease the life span of a patient. For long, natural products have played an essential alternative source of therapeutic agents due to having least or no side effect and toxicity. The present study is an attempt to promote natural anticancer drug development focusing on the updated structural information of PDGFR, EGFR, FGFR, and VEGFR inhibitors isolated from the plant sources. The data used in this review has been collected from internet resources, viz. GOOGLE Web, GOOGLE SCHOLAR, and PubMed Central. The citation of each report was first checked, after which the articles were selected as an authentic reference for the present study. Around 200 journal articles were initially selected, of which around 142 were finally chosen for presenting the study on the natural sourced inhibitors of EGFR, PDGFR, FGFR, and VEGFR-mediated signaling pathways which may help to enhance the potential cancer treatment., (Copyright© Bentham Science Publishers; For any queries, please email at epub@benthamscience.net.)

Fibroblast growth factors (FGFs) and their receptors (FGFRs) have been extensively investigated in solid malignancies, representing an attractive therapeutic target. In breast cancer, especially in estrogen receptor positive (ER+) subtype, FGFR signaling aberrations have been reported to contribute to proliferation, dedifferentiation, metastasis and drug resistance. However, clinical trials evaluating the use of FGFR inhibitors in breast cancer have had disappointing results. The different biological properties of distinct FGFR alterations and lack of established patient selection criteria, in addition to the early use of non-selective inhibitors, are possible reasons of this failure. Herein, we review the current knowledge regarding the role of FGFR signaling in endocrine resistance in breast cancer. We will also summarize the results from the clinical development of FGFR inhibitors in breast cancer, discussing future challenges to identify the correct cohorts of patients to enroll in trials testing FGFR inhibitors., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

How cancer cells adapt to evade the therapeutic effects of drugs targeting oncogenic drivers is poorly understood. Here we report an epigenetic mechanism leading to the adaptive resistance of triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) to fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors. Prolonged FGFR inhibition suppresses the function of BRG1-dependent chromatin remodelling, leading to an epigenetic state that derepresses YAP-associated enhancers. These chromatin changes induce the expression of several amino acid transporters, resulting in increased intracellular levels of specific amino acids that reactivate mTORC1. Consistent with this mechanism, addition of mTORC1 or YAP inhibitors to FGFR blockade synergistically attenuated the growth of TNBC patient-derived xenograft models. Collectively, these findings reveal a feedback loop involving an epigenetic state transition and metabolic reprogramming that leads to adaptive therapeutic resistance and provides potential therapeutic strategies to overcome this mechanism of resistance., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Limited.)

The dysregulation of fibroblast growth factor (FGF) signaling has been implicated in tumorigenesis, tumor progression, angiogenesis, and chemoresistance. The small-molecule AZD4547 is a potent inhibitor of FGF receptors. This study was performed to investigate the antitumor effects and determine the mechanistic details of AZD4547 in ovarian cancer cells. AZD4547 markedly inhibited the proliferation and increased the apoptosis of ovarian cancer cells. AZD4547 also suppressed the migration and invasion of ovarian cancer cells under nontoxic conditions. Furthermore, it attenuated the formation of spheroids and the self-renewal capacities of ovarian cancer stem cells and exerted an antiangiogenic effect. It also suppressed in vivo tumor growth in mice. Collectively, this study demonstrated the antitumor effect of AZD4547 in ovarian cancer cells and suggests that it is a promising agent for ovarian cancer therapy.

Introduction : Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR)/fibroblast growth factor (FGF) is a pathway characterized by recurring alterations in cancer. Its dysregulations enhance cancer cell proliferation, survival, migration and invasion, as well as angiogenesis and immune evasion. Areas covered : FGFR/FGF selective inhibitors belong to a broad class of drugs with some being approved for specific indications and others under investigation in ongoing phase I and II clinical trials. In this review, all available clinical data from trials on selective FGFR/FGF inhibitors as well as described resistance mutations and mechanisms are presented. FGFR/FGF pathway inhibitors are classified according to the mechanism they employ to dampen/suppress signaling and to the preferred FGFR binding mode when X-ray crystal structure is available. Expert opinion : Data presented suggests the general actionability of FGFR1,2,3 mutations and fusions across histologies, whereas FGFR1,2,3 amplifications alone are poor predictors of response to tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Overexpression on immunohistochemistry (IHC) of FGF19, the stimulatory ligand of FGFR4, can predict response to FGFR selective inhibitors in hepatocellular carcinoma. Whereas IHC overexpression of FGFR1,2,3 is not sufficient to predict benefit from FGFR inhibitors across solid tumors. FGFR1,2,3 mRNA overexpression can predict response even in absence of structural alteration. Data on resistance mutations suggests the need for new inhibitors to overcome gatekeeper mutations.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) is a promising anticancer target. Currently, most FGFR inhibitors lack sufficient selectivity and have nonnegligible activity against kinase insert domain receptor (KDR), limiting their feasibility due to the serious side effects. Notably, compensatory activation occurs among FGFR1-4, suggesting the urgent need to develop selective pan-FGFR1-4 inhibitors. Here, we explored the antitumor activity of DW14383, a novel irreversible FGFR1-4 inhibitor. DW14383 exhibited equivalently high potent inhibition against FGFR1, 2, 3 and 4, with IC 50 values of less than 0.3, 1.1, less than 0.3, and 0.5 nmol/L, respectively. It is a selective FGFR inhibitor, exhibiting more than 1100-fold selectivity for FGFR1 over recombinant KDR, making it one of the most selective FGFR inhibitors over KDR described to date. Furthermore, DW14383 significantly inhibited cellular FGFR1-4 signaling, inducing G1/S cell cycle arrest, which in turn antagonized FGFR-dependent tumor cell proliferation. In contrast, DW14383 had no obvious antiproliferative effect against cancer cell lines without FGFR aberration, further confirming its selectivity against FGFR. In representative FGFR-dependent xenograft models, DW14383 oral administration substantially suppressed tumor growth by simultaneously inhibiting tumor proliferation and angiogenesis via inhibiting FGFR signaling. In summary, DW14383 is a promising selective irreversible pan-FGFR inhibitor with pan-tumor spectrum potential in FGFR1-4 aberrant cancers, which has the potential to overcome compensatory activation among FGFR1-4., (© 2020. CPS and SIMM.)

Infigratinib (INF) is a promising selective inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptors 1-3 that has recently been accorded both orphan drug designation and priority review status by the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of advanced cholangiocarcinoma. Its propensity to undergo bioactivation to electrophilic species was recently expounded upon. However, other than causing aberrant idiosyncratic toxicities, these reactive intermediates may elicit mechanism-based inactivation of cytochrome P450 enzymes. In this study, we investigated the interactions between INF and the most abundant hepatic CYP3A. Our findings revealed that, apart from being a potent noncompetitive reversible inhibitor of CYP3A4, INF inactivated CYP3A4 in a time-, concentration- and NADPH-dependent manner with inactivator concentration at half-maximum inactivation rate constant, maximum inactivation rate constant, and partition ratio of 4.17 µM, 0.068 minute -1 , and 41, respectively, when rivaroxaban was employed as the probe substrate. Coincubation with testosterone (alternative CYP3A substrate) or ketoconazole (direct CYP3A inhibitor) attenuated the rate of inactivation, whereas the inclusion of glutathione and catalase did not confer such protection. The lack of enzyme activity recovery after dialysis for 4 hours and oxidation with potassium ferricyanide, coupled with the absence of the characteristic Soret peak signature collectively substantiated that inactivation of CYP3A4 by INF was not mediated by the formation of quasi-irreversible metabolite-intermediate complexes but rather through irreversible covalent adduction to the prosthetic heme and/or apoprotein. Finally, glutathione trapping and high-resolution mass spectrometry experimental results unraveled two plausible bioactivation mechanisms of INF arising from the generation of a p- benzoquinonediimine and epoxide reactive intermediate. SIGNIFICANCE STATEMENT: The potential of INF to cause MBI of CYP3A4 was unknown. This study reports the reversible noncompetitive inhibition and irreversible covalent MBI of CYP3A4 by INF and proposes two potential bioactivation pathways implicating p- benzoquinonediimine and epoxide reactive intermediates, following which a unique covalent docking methodology was harnessed to elucidate the structural and molecular determinants underscoring its inactivation. Findings from this study lay the groundwork for future investigation of clinically relevant drug-drug interactions between INF and concomitant substrates of CYP3A4., (Copyright © 2021 by The American Society for Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics.)

Background: Treatment options for poorly differentiated (PDTC) and anaplastic (ATC) thyroid carcinoma are unsatisfactory and prognosis is generally poor. Lenvatinib (LEN), a multi-tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFR) 1-4 is approved for advanced radioiodine refractory thyroid carcinoma, but response to single agent is poor in ATC. Recent reports of combining LEN with PD-1 inhibitor pembrolizumab (PEM) are promising., Materials and Methods: Primary ATC (n=93) and PDTC (n=47) tissue samples diagnosed 1997-2019 at five German tertiary care centers were assessed for PD-L1 expression by immunohistochemistry using Tumor Proportion Score (TPS). FGFR 1-4 mRNA was quantified in 31 ATC and 14 PDTC with RNAscope in-situ hybridization. Normal thyroid tissue (NT) and papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC) served as controls. Disease specific survival (DSS) was the primary outcome variable., Results: PD-L1 TPS≥50% was observed in 42% of ATC and 26% of PDTC specimens. Mean PD-L1 expression was significantly higher in ATC (TPS 30%) than in PDTC (5%; p<0.01) and NT (0%, p<0.001). 53% of PDTC samples had PD-L1 expression ≤5%. FGFR mRNA expression was generally low in all samples but combined FGFR1-4 expression was significantly higher in PDTC and ATC compared to NT (each p<0.001). No impact of PD-L1 and FGFR 1-4 expression was observed on DSS., Conclusion: High tumoral expression of PD-L1 in a large proportion of ATCs and a subgroup of PDTCs provides a rationale for immune checkpoint inhibition. FGFR expression is low thyroid tumor cells. The clinically observed synergism of PEM with LEN may be caused by immune modulation., Competing Interests: The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2021 Adam, Kircher, Sbiera, Koehler, Berg, Knösel, Sandner, Fenske, Bläker, Smaxwil, Zielke, Sipos, Allelein, Schott, Dierks, Spitzweg, Fassnacht and Kroiss.)

Background: Particular breast cancer subtypes pose a clinical challenge due to limited targeted therapeutic options and/or poor responses to the existing targeted therapies. While cell lines provide useful pre-clinical models, patient-derived xenografts (PDX) and organoids (PDO) provide significant advantages, including maintenance of genetic and phenotypic heterogeneity, 3D architecture and for PDX, tumor-stroma interactions. In this study, we applied an integrated multi-omic approach across panels of breast cancer PDXs and PDOs in order to identify candidate therapeutic targets, with a major focus on specific FGFRs., Methods: MS-based phosphoproteomics, RNAseq, WES and Western blotting were used to characterize aberrantly activated protein kinases and effects of specific FGFR inhibitors. PDX and PDO were treated with the selective tyrosine kinase inhibitors AZD4547 (FGFR1-3) and BLU9931 (FGFR4). FGFR4 expression in cancer tissue samples and PDOs was assessed by immunohistochemistry. METABRIC and TCGA datasets were interrogated to identify specific FGFR alterations and their association with breast cancer subtype and patient survival., Results: Phosphoproteomic profiling across 18 triple-negative breast cancers (TNBC) and 1 luminal B PDX revealed considerable heterogeneity in kinase activation, but 1/3 of PDX exhibited enhanced phosphorylation of FGFR1, FGFR2 or FGFR4. One TNBC PDX with high FGFR2 activation was exquisitely sensitive to AZD4547. Integrated 'omic analysis revealed a novel FGFR2-SKI fusion that comprised the majority of FGFR2 joined to the C-terminal region of SKI containing the coiled-coil domains. High FGFR4 phosphorylation characterized a luminal B PDX model and treatment with BLU9931 significantly decreased tumor growth. Phosphoproteomic and transcriptomic analyses confirmed on-target action of the two anti-FGFR drugs and also revealed novel effects on the spliceosome, metabolism and extracellular matrix (AZD4547) and RIG-I-like and NOD-like receptor signaling (BLU9931). Interrogation of public datasets revealed FGFR2 amplification, fusion or mutation in TNBC and other breast cancer subtypes, while FGFR4 overexpression and amplification occurred in all breast cancer subtypes and were associated with poor prognosis. Characterization of a PDO panel identified a luminal A PDO with high FGFR4 expression that was sensitive to BLU9931 treatment, further highlighting FGFR4 as a potential therapeutic target., Conclusions: This work highlights how patient-derived models of human breast cancer provide powerful platforms for therapeutic target identification and analysis of drug action, and also the potential of specific FGFRs, including FGFR4, as targets for precision treatment., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Erdafitinib (ERD) is a first-in-class pan inhibitor of fibroblast growth factor receptor 1-4 that has garnered global regulatory approval for the treatment of advanced or metastatic urothelial carcinoma. Although it has been previously reported that ERD elicits time-dependent inhibition (TDI) of cytochrome P450 (P450) 3A4 (CYP3A4), the exact biochemical nature underpinning this observation remains obfuscated. Moreover, it is also uninterrogated if CYP3A5-its highly homologous counterpart-could be susceptible to such interactions. Mechanism-based inactivation (MBI) of P450 is a unique subset of TDI that hinges on prior bioactivation of the drug to a reactive intermediate and possesses profound clinical and toxicological implications due to its irreversible nature. Here, we investigated and confirmed that ERD inactivated both CYP3A isoforms in a time-, concentration-, and NADPH-dependent manner with K I , k inact , and partition ratio of 4.01 and 10.04 μM, 0.120 and 0.045 min -1 , and 32 and 55 for both CYP3A4 and CYP3A5, respectively, when rivaroxaban was employed as the probe substrate. Co-incubation with an alternative substrate or direct inhibitor of CYP3A attenuated the rate of inactivation, whereas the addition of glutathione or catalase did not induce such protection. The lack of enzyme activity recovery following dialysis for 4 h and oxidation with potassium ferricyanide combined with the lack of a Soret peak in spectral scans collectively substantiated that ERD is an irreversible covalent MBI of CYP3A. Finally, glutathione trapping and high-resolution mass spectrometry experiments illuminated a plausible bioactivation mechanism of ERD by CYP3A arising from metabolic epoxidation of its quinoxaline ring.

Purpose of Review: Cholangiocarcinoma is an aggressive cancer with a poor prognosis and limited treatment. Gene sequencing studies have identified genetic alterations in fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) in a significant proportion of cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) patients. This review will discuss the FGFR signaling pathway's role in CCA and highlight the development of therapeutic strategies targeting this pathway., Recent Findings: The development of highly potent and selective FGFR inhibitors has led to the approval of pemigatinib for FGFR2 fusion or rearranged CCA. Other selective FGFR inhibitors are currently under clinical investigation and show promising activity. Despite encouraging results, the emergence of resistance is inevitable. Studies using circulating tumor DNA and on-treatment tissue biopsies have elucidated underlying mechanisms of intrinsic and acquired resistance. There is a critical need to not only develop more effective compounds, but also innovative sequencing strategies and combinations to overcome resistance to selective FGFR inhibition. Therapeutic development of precision medicine for FGFR-altered CCA is a dynamic process of involving a comprehensive understanding of tumor biology, rational clinical trial design, and therapeutic optimization. Alterations in FGFR represent a valid therapeutic target in CCA and selective FGFR inhibitors are treatment options for this patient population., (© 2021. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature.)