Search

Your search keyword '"Reinders Folmer C"' showing total 17 results
Start Over Author "Reinders Folmer C"
17 results on '"Reinders Folmer C"'

1. REPLY TO NIELSEN ET AL.: Social mindfulness is associated with countries’ environmental performance and individual environmental concern

Author

van Doesum, N, Murphy, R, Gallucci, M, Aharonov-Majar, E, Athenstaedt, U, Au, W, Bai, L, Bohm, R, Bovina, I, Buchan, N, Chen, X, Dumont, K, Engelmann, J, Eriksson, K, Euh, H, Fiedler, S, Friesen, J, Gachter, S, Garcia, C, Gonzalez, R, Graf, S, Growiec, K, Guimond, S, Hrebickova, M, Immer-Bernold, E, Joireman, J, Karagonlar, G, Kawakami, K, Kiyonari, T, Kou, Y, Kyrtsis, A, Lay, S, Leonardelli, G, Li, N, Li, Y, Maciejovsky, B, Manesi, Z, Mashuri, A, Mok, A, Moser, K, Motak, L, Netedu, A, Platow, M, Raczka-Winkler, K, Reinders Folmer, C, Reyna, C, Romano, A, Shalvi, S, Simao, C, Stivers, A, Strimling, P, Tsirbas, Y, Utz, S, van der Meij, L, Waldzus, S, Wang, Y, Weber, B, Weisel, O, Wildschut, T, Winter, F, Wu, J, Yong, J, van Lange, P, van Doesum N. J., Murphy R. O., Gallucci M., Aharonov-Majar E., Athenstaedt U., Au W. T., Bai L., Bohm R., Bovina I., Buchan N. R., Chen X. -P., Dumont K. B., Engelmann J. B., Eriksson K., Euh H., Fiedler S., Friesen J., Gachter S., Garcia C., Gonzalez R., Graf S., Growiec K., Guimond S., Hrebickova M., Immer-Bernold E., Joireman J., Karagonlar G., Kawakami K., Kiyonari T., Kou Y., Kyrtsis A. -A., Lay S., Leonardelli G. J., Li N. P., Li Y., Maciejovsky B., Manesi Z., Mashuri A., Mok A., Moser K. S., Motak L., Netedu A., Platow M. J., Raczka-Winkler K., Reinders Folmer C. P., Reyna C., Romano A., Shalvi S., Simao C., Stivers A. W., Strimling P., Tsirbas Y., Utz S., van der Meij L., Waldzus S., Wang Y., Weber B., Weisel O., Wildschut T., Winter F., Wu J., Yong J. C., van Lange P. A. M., van Doesum, N, Murphy, R, Gallucci, M, Aharonov-Majar, E, Athenstaedt, U, Au, W, Bai, L, Bohm, R, Bovina, I, Buchan, N, Chen, X, Dumont, K, Engelmann, J, Eriksson, K, Euh, H, Fiedler, S, Friesen, J, Gachter, S, Garcia, C, Gonzalez, R, Graf, S, Growiec, K, Guimond, S, Hrebickova, M, Immer-Bernold, E, Joireman, J, Karagonlar, G, Kawakami, K, Kiyonari, T, Kou, Y, Kyrtsis, A, Lay, S, Leonardelli, G, Li, N, Li, Y, Maciejovsky, B, Manesi, Z, Mashuri, A, Mok, A, Moser, K, Motak, L, Netedu, A, Platow, M, Raczka-Winkler, K, Reinders Folmer, C, Reyna, C, Romano, A, Shalvi, S, Simao, C, Stivers, A, Strimling, P, Tsirbas, Y, Utz, S, van der Meij, L, Waldzus, S, Wang, Y, Weber, B, Weisel, O, Wildschut, T, Winter, F, Wu, J, Yong, J, van Lange, P, van Doesum N. J., Murphy R. O., Gallucci M., Aharonov-Majar E., Athenstaedt U., Au W. T., Bai L., Bohm R., Bovina I., Buchan N. R., Chen X. -P., Dumont K. B., Engelmann J. B., Eriksson K., Euh H., Fiedler S., Friesen J., Gachter S., Garcia C., Gonzalez R., Graf S., Growiec K., Guimond S., Hrebickova M., Immer-Bernold E., Joireman J., Karagonlar G., Kawakami K., Kiyonari T., Kou Y., Kyrtsis A. -A., Lay S., Leonardelli G. J., Li N. P., Li Y., Maciejovsky B., Manesi Z., Mashuri A., Mok A., Moser K. S., Motak L., Netedu A., Platow M. J., Raczka-Winkler K., Reinders Folmer C. P., Reyna C., Romano A., Shalvi S., Simao C., Stivers A. W., Strimling P., Tsirbas Y., Utz S., van der Meij L., Waldzus S., Wang Y., Weber B., Weisel O., Wildschut T., Winter F., Wu J., Yong J. C., and van Lange P. A. M.

Published
2022

2. Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe

Author

van Doesum, N, Murphy, R, Gallucci, M, Aharonov-Majar, E, Athenstaedt, U, Au, W, Bai, L, Bohm, R, Bovina, I, Buchan, N, Chen, X, Dumont, K, Engelmann, J, Eriksson, K, Euh, H, Fiedler, S, Friesen, J, Gachter, S, Garcia, C, Gonzalez, R, Graf, S, Growiec, K, Guimond, S, Hrebickova, M, Immer-Bernold, E, Joireman, J, Karagonlar, G, Kawakami, K, Kiyonari, T, Kou, Y, Kuhlman, D, Kyrtsis, A, Lay, S, Leonardelli, G, Li, N, Li, Y, Maciejovsky, B, Manesi, Z, Mashuri, A, Mok, A, Moser, K, Motak, L, Netedu, A, Pammi, C, Platow, M, Raczka-Winkler, K, Reinders Folmer, C, Reyna, C, Romano, A, Shalvi, S, Simao, C, Stivers, A, Strimling, P, Tsirbas, Y, Utz, S, van der Meij, L, Waldzus, S, Wang, Y, Weber, B, Weisel, O, Wildschut, T, Winter, F, Wu, J, Yong, J, van Lange, P, van Doesum N. J., Murphy R. O., Gallucci M., Aharonov-Majar E., Athenstaedt U., Au W. T., Bai L., Bohm R., Bovina I., Buchan N. R., Chen X. -P., Dumont K. B., Engelmann J. B., Eriksson K., Euh H., Fiedler S., Friesen J., Gachter S., Garcia C., Gonzalez R., Graf S., Growiec K., Guimond S., Hrebickova M., Immer-Bernold E., Joireman J., Karagonlar G., Kawakami K., Kiyonari T., Kou Y., Kuhlman D. M., Kyrtsis A. -A., Lay S., Leonardelli G. J., Li N. P., Li Y., Maciejovsky B., Manesi Z., Mashuri A., Mok A., Moser K. S., Motak L., Netedu A., Pammi C., Platow M. J., Raczka-Winkler K., Reinders Folmer C. P., Reyna C., Romano A., Shalvi S., Simao C., Stivers A. W., Strimling P., Tsirbas Y., Utz S., van der Meij L., Waldzus S., Wang Y., Weber B., Weisel O., Wildschut T., Winter F., Wu J., Yong J. C., van Lange P. A. M., van Doesum, N, Murphy, R, Gallucci, M, Aharonov-Majar, E, Athenstaedt, U, Au, W, Bai, L, Bohm, R, Bovina, I, Buchan, N, Chen, X, Dumont, K, Engelmann, J, Eriksson, K, Euh, H, Fiedler, S, Friesen, J, Gachter, S, Garcia, C, Gonzalez, R, Graf, S, Growiec, K, Guimond, S, Hrebickova, M, Immer-Bernold, E, Joireman, J, Karagonlar, G, Kawakami, K, Kiyonari, T, Kou, Y, Kuhlman, D, Kyrtsis, A, Lay, S, Leonardelli, G, Li, N, Li, Y, Maciejovsky, B, Manesi, Z, Mashuri, A, Mok, A, Moser, K, Motak, L, Netedu, A, Pammi, C, Platow, M, Raczka-Winkler, K, Reinders Folmer, C, Reyna, C, Romano, A, Shalvi, S, Simao, C, Stivers, A, Strimling, P, Tsirbas, Y, Utz, S, van der Meij, L, Waldzus, S, Wang, Y, Weber, B, Weisel, O, Wildschut, T, Winter, F, Wu, J, Yong, J, van Lange, P, van Doesum N. J., Murphy R. O., Gallucci M., Aharonov-Majar E., Athenstaedt U., Au W. T., Bai L., Bohm R., Bovina I., Buchan N. R., Chen X. -P., Dumont K. B., Engelmann J. B., Eriksson K., Euh H., Fiedler S., Friesen J., Gachter S., Garcia C., Gonzalez R., Graf S., Growiec K., Guimond S., Hrebickova M., Immer-Bernold E., Joireman J., Karagonlar G., Kawakami K., Kiyonari T., Kou Y., Kuhlman D. M., Kyrtsis A. -A., Lay S., Leonardelli G. J., Li N. P., Li Y., Maciejovsky B., Manesi Z., Mashuri A., Mok A., Moser K. S., Motak L., Netedu A., Pammi C., Platow M. J., Raczka-Winkler K., Reinders Folmer C. P., Reyna C., Romano A., Shalvi S., Simao C., Stivers A. W., Strimling P., Tsirbas Y., Utz S., van der Meij L., Waldzus S., Wang Y., Weber B., Weisel O., Wildschut T., Winter F., Wu J., Yong J. C., and van Lange P. A. M.

Abstract

Humans are social animals, but not everyone will be mindful of others to the same extent. Individual differences have been found, but would social mindfulness also be shaped by one's location in the world? Expecting cross-national differences to exist, we examined if and how social mindfulness differs across countries. At little to no material cost, social mindfulness typically entails small acts of attention or kindness. Even though fairly common, such low-cost cooperation has received little empirical attention. Measuring social mindfulness across 31 samples from industrialized countries and regions (n = 8,354), we found considerable variation. Among selected country-level variables, greater social mindfulness was most strongly associated with countries' better general performance on environmental protection. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on prosociality by targeting the kind of everyday cooperation that is more focused on communicating benevolence than on providing material benefits.

Published
2021

3. REPLY TO NIELSEN ET AL. : Social mindfulness is associated with countries’ environmental performance and individual environmental concern

Author

van Doesum, N. J., Murphy, R. O., Gallucci, M., Aharonov-Majar, E., Athenstaedt, U., Au, W. T., Bai, L., Böhm, R., Bovina, I., Buchan, N. R., Chen, X.-P., Dumont, K. B., Engelmann, J. B., Eriksson, Kimmo, Euh, H., Fiedler, S., Friesen, J., Gächter, S., Garcia, C., González, R., Graf, S., Growiec, K., Guimond, S., Hřebíčková, M., Immer-Bernold, E., Joireman, J., Karagonlar, G., Kawakami, K., Kiyonari, T., Kou, Y., Kyrtsis, A.-A., Lay, S., Leonardelli, G. J., Li, N. P., Li, Y., Maciejovsky, B., Manesi, Z., Mashuri, A., Mok, A., Moser, K. S., Moták, L., Netedu, A., Platow, M. J., Raczka-Winkler, K., Reinders Folmer, C. P., Reyna, C., Romano, A., Shalvi, S., Simão, C., Stivers, A. W., Strimling, P., Tsirbas, Y., Utz, S., van der Meij, L., Waldzus, S., Wang, Y., Weber, B., Weisel, O., Wildschut, T., Winter, F., Wu, J., Yong, J. C., van Lange, P. A. M., van Doesum, N. J., Murphy, R. O., Gallucci, M., Aharonov-Majar, E., Athenstaedt, U., Au, W. T., Bai, L., Böhm, R., Bovina, I., Buchan, N. R., Chen, X.-P., Dumont, K. B., Engelmann, J. B., Eriksson, Kimmo, Euh, H., Fiedler, S., Friesen, J., Gächter, S., Garcia, C., González, R., Graf, S., Growiec, K., Guimond, S., Hřebíčková, M., Immer-Bernold, E., Joireman, J., Karagonlar, G., Kawakami, K., Kiyonari, T., Kou, Y., Kyrtsis, A.-A., Lay, S., Leonardelli, G. J., Li, N. P., Li, Y., Maciejovsky, B., Manesi, Z., Mashuri, A., Mok, A., Moser, K. S., Moták, L., Netedu, A., Platow, M. J., Raczka-Winkler, K., Reinders Folmer, C. P., Reyna, C., Romano, A., Shalvi, S., Simão, C., Stivers, A. W., Strimling, P., Tsirbas, Y., Utz, S., van der Meij, L., Waldzus, S., Wang, Y., Weber, B., Weisel, O., Wildschut, T., Winter, F., Wu, J., Yong, J. C., and van Lange, P. A. M.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Social Distancing in America: Understanding Long-term Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Recommendations

Author

Reinders Folmer, C., Brownlee, M., Fine, A., Kuiper, M.E., Olthuis, E., Kooistra, E.B., de Bruijn, A.L., van Rooij, B., and PSC (FdR)

Abstract

In the period from May to July, the United States repealed statewide and local lockdown measures, reopened society, and became the global leader in reported infections and deaths from the coronavirus COVID-19. During this timeframe, the country saw some of the largest civil rights protests in United States history, and increasing politicization of the pandemic leading up to the Presidential elections. Throughout these events, social distancing recommendations have remained in force. However, social distancing was no longer the focus of the public health response, and was largely overshadowed by face masks – despite evidence of its effectiveness for reducing virus transmission. This study examines to what extent Americans have continued to adhere to social distancing measures across these developments, and which factors sustained adherence. Our findings, based on three waves of nationally representative and cross-sectional studies conducted in May, June, and July, show that adherence to social distancing measures declined from May to July, as did knowledge of these measures, citizens’ practical capacity to adhere to them, and the social norms for adherence. At the same time, opportunities to violate these measures have increased. However, adherence levels stabilized in July, and support for social distancing measures among Americans has remained high throughout. These findings provide important insight into what motivated Americans to adhere to social distancing measures when distancing ceased to be the focus of the public health response. It thereby identifies important directions through which public health policy could sustain or promote adherence to mitigation measures in the United States.

Published
2020

6. Sustaining Compliance with Covid-19 Mitigation Measures? Understanding Distancing Behavior in the Netherlands during June 2020

Author

de Bruijn Al, Kooistra Eb, Olthuis E, Megan Brownlee, Malouke Esra Kuiper, van Rooij B, Reinders Folmer C, and Adam Fine

Subjects
Punishment, Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), Distancing, media_common.quotation_subject, Social distance, Pandemic, Intrinsic motivation, Demographic economics, Psychology, Enforcement, Compliance (psychology), media_common
Abstract

In the month of June, the Netherlands had continued its singular trajectory in combating the COVID-19 pandemic. After the transition from the “intelligent lockdown” into the “1.5 meter society,” the month of June heralded further relaxations of the prior mitigation measures. Building on our previous surveys during the month of May, this paper reports the findings of two additional survey waves collected in June (between 8-11 and between 22-26) among nationally representative samples (N = 1041 and N = 1033). The results show that the processes that sustained compliance during the month of May continued to be influential, especially citizens’ intrinsic motivation to comply, their capacity to do so, their impulse control, and social norms that sustained compliance. Furthermore, there were some indications that extrinsic reasons, such as the likelihood of punishment and the fairness of enforcement, may have become more influential in shaping compliance. A comparison to the findings from May revealed, however, that compliance was gradually declining in the Netherlands, as were the resources that sustain it.

Published
2020
Full Text
View/download PDF

7. Compliance in the 1.5 Meter Society: Longitudinal Analysis of Citizens’ Adherence to COVID-19 Mitigation Measures in a Representative Sample in the Netherlands

Author

Reinders Folmer, C., Kuiper, M.E., Olthuis, E., Kooistra, E.B., de Bruijn, A.L., Brownlee, M., Fine, A., van Rooij, B., ARL (FdR), PSC (FdR), and FdR overig onderzoek

Abstract

In the month of May, the Netherlands moved out of the “intelligent lockdown”, and into the “1.5 meter society”, which aims to mitigate the COVID-19 pandemic by means of safe-distance measures. This paper assesses how Dutch citizens have complied with these social distancing measures. It analyses data from two surveys conducted in May (between 8-14 and between 22-26) among nationally representative samples (N = 984 and N = 1021). We find that a combination of factors explains social distancing compliance. On the one hand we see that people are more likely to comply if they have an intrinsic motivation to do so, when they have the capacity to comply, when they have good impulse control, when they think compliance is normal, and when they see a general duty to obey rules generally. The paper also assesses how compliance has changed over time, assessing changes in May as well as how these are different from compliance with lockdown measures in April. During this period, there has been a gradual decline in compliance that coincides with a decline in intrinsic motivations and capacity for compliance, and there has been an increase in opportunities to violate the measures. The paper assesses what these changes may mean for current and future success of COVID-19 mitigation measures.

Published
2020

8. Do multiple-trial games better reflect prosocial behavior than single-trial games?

Author

Haesevoets, T., Van Hiel, A., Dierckx, K., Reinders Folmer, C., and PSC (FdR)

Subjects
Economics and Econometrics, social value orientation, aggregation, General Decision Sciences, Social Sciences, PREFERENCES, single versus multiple measurementsnakeywords, TRAGEDY, BF1-990, DILEMMAS, prosocial behavior, TAKE-SOME, Psychology, mixed-motive games, FIELD EXPERIMENTS, VALIDITY, GIVE-SOME, Applied Psychology, single versus multiple measurements, SCALE, COOPERATION
Abstract

Most prior research on the external validity of mixed-motive games has studied only one single game version and/or one specific type of real-life prosocial behavior. The present study employs a different approach. We used multiple game trials — with different payoff structures — to measure participants’ behavior in the Prisoner’s Dilemma, the Commons Dilemma, and the Public Goods Dilemma. We then examined the associations between these aggregated game behaviors and a wide set of self-reported prosocial behaviors such as donations, commuting, and environmental behaviors. We also related these prosocial behavior measures to a dispositional measure of prosociality, social value orientation. We report evidence that the weak statistical relationships routinely observed in prior studies are at least partially a consequence of failures to aggregate. More specifically, our results show that aggregation over multiple game trials was especially effective for the Prisoner’s Dilemma, whereas it was somewhat effective for the Public Goods Dilemma. Yet, aggregation on the side of the prosocial behaviors was effective for both these games, as well as for social value orientation. The Commons Dilemma, however, turned out to yield invariably poor relationships with prosocial behavior, regardless of the level of aggregation. Based on these findings, we conclude that the use of multiple instances of game behaviorandprosocial behavior is preferable to the use of only a single measurement.

Published
2020

11. Reply to Nielsen et al.: social mindfulness is associated with countries’ environmental performance and individual environmental concern

Author

Doesum, N., Murphy, R., Gallucci, M., Aharonov-Majar, E., Athenstaedt, U., Au, W., Bai, L., Böhm, R., Bovina, I., Buchan, N., Chen, X., Dumont, K., Engelmann, J., Eriksson, K., Euh, H., Fiedler, S., Friesen, J., Gächter, S., Garcia, C., González, R., Graf, S., Growiec, K., Guimond, S., Hřebíčková, M., Immer-Bernold, E., Joireman, J., Karagonlar, G., Kawakami, K., Kiyonari, T., Kou, Y., Kuhlman, D., Kyrtsis, A., Lay, S., Leonardelli, G., Li, N., Li, Y., Maciejovsky, B., Manesi, Z., Mashuri, A., Mok, A., Moser, K., Moták, L., Netedu, A., Pammi, C., Platow, M., Raczka-Winkler, K., Folmer, C., Reyna, C., Romano, A., Shalvi, S., Simão, C., Stivers, A., Strimling, P., Tsirbas, Y., Utz, S., van der Meij, L., Waldzus, S., Wang, Y., Weber, B., Weisel, O., Wildschut, T., Winter, F., Wu, J., Yong, J., Lange, P., van Doesum, N, Murphy, R, Gallucci, M, Aharonov-Majar, E, Athenstaedt, U, Au, W, Bai, L, Bohm, R, Bovina, I, Buchan, N, Chen, X, Dumont, K, Engelmann, J, Eriksson, K, Euh, H, Fiedler, S, Friesen, J, Gachter, S, Garcia, C, Gonzalez, R, Graf, S, Growiec, K, Guimond, S, Hrebickova, M, Immer-Bernold, E, Joireman, J, Karagonlar, G, Kawakami, K, Kiyonari, T, Kou, Y, Kyrtsis, A, Lay, S, Leonardelli, G, Li, N, Li, Y, Maciejovsky, B, Manesi, Z, Mashuri, A, Mok, A, Moser, K, Motak, L, Netedu, A, Platow, M, Raczka-Winkler, K, Reinders Folmer, C, Reyna, C, Romano, A, Shalvi, S, Simao, C, Stivers, A, Strimling, P, Tsirbas, Y, Utz, S, van der Meij, L, Waldzus, S, Wang, Y, Weber, B, Weisel, O, Wildschut, T, Winter, F, Wu, J, Yong, J, van Lange, P, Social & Organizational Psychology, Organizational Psychology, Social Psychology, IBBA, A-LAB, Microeconomics (ASE, FEB), Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, and PSC (FdR)

Subjects
Multidisciplinary, Mindfulness
Abstract

Nielsen et al. (1) argue that Van Doesum et al. (2) need to consider three points for their interpretation of a positive association between individual-level social mindfulness (SoMi) and environmental performance (EPI) at the country level (3). The association is weaker when 1) it is controlled for GDP and 2) when the data of three countries are removed; also, 3) the data do not address the association between SoMi and individual-level environmental concern. We discuss these points in turn.

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

12. Social mindfulness and prosociality vary across the globe

Author

Susann Fiedler, Kimmo Eriksson, Chandrasekhar V. S. Pammi, Justin P. Friesen, Chris Reinders Folmer, Adrian Netedu, Leander van der Meij, Ali Mashuri, Jeff Joireman, Toko Kiyonari, Robert Böhm, Cláudia Simão, Yannis Tsirbas, Kitty Dumont, Sonja Utz, Ori Weisel, Angelo Romano, Efrat Aharonov-Majar, Yiwen Wang, Michael J. Platow, Aurelia Mok, Junhui Wu, Fabian Winter, Nancy R. Buchan, Ursula Athenstaedt, Kerry Kawakami, Roberto González, Paul A. M. Van Lange, Karolina Raczka-Winkler, Karin S. Moser, Jose C. Yong, Xiao-Ping Chen, Simon Gächter, Liying Bai, Serge Guimond, Katarzyna Growiec, Camilo Garcia, Boris Maciejovsky, Sven Waldzus, Alexandros-Andreas Kyrtsis, Ryan O. Murphy, Niels J. Van Doesum, Cecilia Reyna, Yang Li, Geoffrey J. Leonardelli, Siugmin Lay, Yu Kou, Ladislav Moták, Hyun Euh, Inna Bovina, Bernd Weber, Elizabeth Immer-Bernold, Shaul Shalvi, Adam W. Stivers, Martina Hřebíčková, Sylvie Graf, Zoi Manesi, Wing Tung Au, Jan B. Engelmann, Pontus Strimling, Marcello Gallucci, Gökhan Karagonlar, Tim Wildschut, Norman P. Li, D. Michael Kuhlman, Leiden University, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (VU), Universität Zürich [Zürich] = University of Zurich (UZH), Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca [Milano] (UNIMIB), Ben-Gurion University of the Negev (BGU), University of Graz, The Chinese University of Hong Kong [Hong Kong], Fuzhou University [Fuzhou], University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (KU), Moscow State University of Psychology and Education, University of South Carolina [Columbia], University of Washington [Seattle], University of South Africa (UNISA), University of Amsterdam [Amsterdam] (UvA), Stockholm University, University of Minnesota [Twin Cities] (UMN), University of Minnesota System, Vienna University of Economics and Business, Wirtschaftsuniversität Wien [Austria] (WU), University of Manitoba [Winnipeg], University of Nottingham, UK (UON), Universidad Veracruzana, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (UC), Institute of Psychology, Czech Academy of Sciences, Brno, Institute of Psychology, SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Laboratoire de Psychologie Sociale et Cognitive (LAPSCO), Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (CNRS)-Université Clermont Auvergne (UCA), Sherpany Product Department, Agilentia AG, Washington State University (WSU), Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi = Dokuz Eylül University [Izmir] (DEÜ), York University [Toronto], Aoyama Gakuin University (AGU), Beijing Normal University (BNU), University of Delaware [Newark], National and Kapodistrian University of Athens (NKUA), University of Toronto, Singapore Management University (SIS), Singapore Management University, Nagoya University, University of California [Riverside] (UCR), University of California, Brawijaya University (UB), City University of Hong Kong [Hong Kong] (CUHK), London South Bank University (LSBU), University of Queensland [Brisbane], Centre de Recherche en Psychologie de la Connaissance, du Langage et de l'Émotion (PsyCLÉ), Aix Marseille Université (AMU), Alexandru Ioan Cuza University of Iași [Romania], University of Allahabad, Australian National University (ANU), University of Bonn, Ghenth University, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba [Argentina], Universidade Católica Portuguesa [Porto], Gonzaga University, The Institute for Futures Studies, Stockholm, Leibniz-Institut für Wissensmedien [Tübingen], Eindhoven University of Technology [Eindhoven] (TU/e), Instituto Universitário de Lisboa (ISCTE-IUL), Tel Aviv University [Tel Aviv], University of Southampton, Max-Planck-Institute for Research on Collective Goods, Chinese Academy of Sciences [Beijing] (CAS), Nanyang Technological University [Singapour], Veritati - Repositório Institucional da Universidade Católica Portuguesa, Social & Organizational Psychology, Organizational Psychology, Social Psychology, IBBA, A-LAB, Universiteit Leiden, Università degli Studi di Milano-Bicocca = University of Milano-Bicocca (UNIMIB), Karl-Franzens-Universität Graz, University of Copenhagen = Københavns Universitet (UCPH), University of California [Riverside] (UC Riverside), University of California (UC), Universität Bonn = University of Bonn, Universiteit Gent = Ghent University (UGENT), Tel Aviv University (TAU), Faculteit Economie en Bedrijfskunde, Experimental and Political Economics / CREED (ASE, FEB), PSC (FdR), Human Performance Management, EAISI Health, Karl-Franzens-Universität [Graz, Autriche], van Doesum, N, Murphy, R, Gallucci, M, Aharonov-Majar, E, Athenstaedt, U, Au, W, Bai, L, Bohm, R, Bovina, I, Buchan, N, Chen, X, Dumont, K, Engelmann, J, Eriksson, K, Euh, H, Fiedler, S, Friesen, J, Gachter, S, Garcia, C, Gonzalez, R, Graf, S, Growiec, K, Guimond, S, Hrebickova, M, Immer-Bernold, E, Joireman, J, Karagonlar, G, Kawakami, K, Kiyonari, T, Kou, Y, Kuhlman, D, Kyrtsis, A, Lay, S, Leonardelli, G, Li, N, Li, Y, Maciejovsky, B, Manesi, Z, Mashuri, A, Mok, A, Moser, K, Motak, L, Netedu, A, Pammi, C, Platow, M, Raczka-Winkler, K, Reinders Folmer, C, Reyna, C, Romano, A, Shalvi, S, Simao, C, Stivers, A, Strimling, P, Tsirbas, Y, Utz, S, van der Meij, L, Waldzus, S, Wang, Y, Weber, B, Weisel, O, Wildschut, T, Winter, F, Wu, J, Yong, J, and van Lange, P

Subjects
Mindfulness, L900, Kindness, media_common.quotation_subject, Social mindfulness, Social Sciences, Globe, [SHS.PSY]Humanities and Social Sciences/Psychology, 050109 social psychology, Ciências Sociais::Psicologia [Domínio/Área Científica], 050105 experimental psychology, Providing material, SDG 17 - Partnerships for the Goals, Cross-national difference, medicine, 0501 psychology and cognitive sciences, media_common, Multidisciplinary, social mindfulness, cross-national differences, low-cost cooperation, 05 social sciences, C800, Cross-national differences, medicine.anatomical_structure, Variation (linguistics), Low-cost cooperation, Psychological and Cognitive Sciences, [SCCO.PSYC]Cognitive science/Psychology, Social animal, Social mindfulne, Psychology, Developed country, Social psychology
Abstract

Significance Cooperation is key to well-functioning groups and societies. Rather than addressing high-cost cooperation involving giving money or time and effort, we examine social mindfulness—a form of interpersonal benevolence that requires basic perspective-taking and is aimed at leaving choice for others. Do societies differ in social mindfulness, and if so, does it matter? Here, we find not only considerable variation across 31 nations and regions but also an association between social mindfulness and countries’ performance on environmental protection. We conclude that something as small and concrete as interpersonal benevolence can be entwined with current and future issues of global importance., Humans are social animals, but not everyone will be mindful of others to the same extent. Individual differences have been found, but would social mindfulness also be shaped by one’s location in the world? Expecting cross-national differences to exist, we examined if and how social mindfulness differs across countries. At little to no material cost, social mindfulness typically entails small acts of attention or kindness. Even though fairly common, such low-cost cooperation has received little empirical attention. Measuring social mindfulness across 31 samples from industrialized countries and regions (n = 8,354), we found considerable variation. Among selected country-level variables, greater social mindfulness was most strongly associated with countries’ better general performance on environmental protection. Together, our findings contribute to the literature on prosociality by targeting the kind of everyday cooperation that is more focused on communicating benevolence than on providing material benefits.

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

13. Can criminology sway the public? How empirical findings about deterrence affect public punishment preferences.

Author

Rose B, Kuiper ME, Reinders Folmer C, and van Rooij B

Abstract

Background Setting: Punitive approaches to deter offending remain popular despite limited evidence of their effectiveness. This study investigated what effect presenting empirical criminological findings about the effectiveness of deterrence to a general public has on their punishment preferences. It builds on earlier research showing that such presentation reduces the public's inclination towards strict punishment. The present study extended this research by exploring whether the impact of scientific evidence on public punishment preferences is affected by crime severity and by exploring cognitive and psychological factors that may underpin this relationship., Methods: Using a vignette study paradigm, a general public sample of 330 participants were asked to make hypothetical punishment decisions to reduce crime (whether or not to double sentences) for one of three crime types that varied in severity. For each crime type, half of participants were additionally provided with a summary of research on the deterrent effect of punitive policy measures., Results: Presenting scientific evidence reduced participants' preferences for stronger punishment and that this effect remained consistent regardless of crime severity-ranging from burglary to homicide. In addition, we did not find evidence that difference in individuals' cognitive style, negative emotional reactions, perceptions about seriousness, or beliefs about redeemability moderated or mediated this relationship., Conclusions: This study provides compelling findings that further clarify the circumstances required for scientific evidence to be successfully disseminated to a general public to bring their punishment preferences more in line with the state of empirical science., Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40163-024-00240-8., Competing Interests: Competing interestsThe authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article., (© The Author(s) 2024.)

Published
2024
Full Text
View/download PDF

14. A Network Approach to Compliance: A Complexity Science Understanding of How Rules Shape Behavior.

Author

Kuiper ME, Chambon M, de Bruijn AL, Reinders Folmer C, Olthuis EH, Brownlee M, Kooistra EB, Fine A, van Harreveld F, Lunansky G, and van Rooij B

Abstract

To understand how compliance develops both in everyday and corporate environments, it is crucial to understand how different mechanisms work together to shape individuals' (non)compliant behavior. Existing compliance studies typically focus on a subset of theories (i.e., rational choice theories, social theories, legitimacy theories, capacity theories, and opportunity theories) to understand how key variables from one or several of these theories shape individual compliance. The present study provides a first integrated understanding of compliance, rooted in complexity science, in which key elements from these theories are considered simultaneously, and their relations to compliance and each other are explored using network analysis. This approach is developed by analyzing online survey data ( N  = 562) about compliance with COVID-19 mitigation measures. Traditional regression analysis shows that elements from nearly all major compliance theories (except for social theories) are associated with compliance. The network analysis revealed groupings and interconnections of variables that did not track the existing compliance theories and point to a complexity overlooked in existing compliance research. These findings demonstrate a fundamentally different perspective on compliance, which moves away from traditional narrow, non-network approaches. Instead, they showcase a complexity science understanding of compliance, in which compliance is understood as a network of interacting variables derived from different theories that interact with compliance. This points to a new research agenda that is oriented on mapping compliance networks, and testing and modelling how regulatory and management interventions interact with each other and compliance within such networks., Supplementary Information: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10551-022-05128-8., Competing Interests: Conflict of interestThe authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose., (© The Author(s) 2022.)

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

15. Improving the measurement of prosociality through aggregation of game behavior.

Author

Haesevoets T, Reinders Folmer C, and Van Hiel A

Subjects
Altruism, Humans, Personality, Social Behavior
Abstract

Prior research has found that people's choices in economic games are often only modestly related to their prosocial personality traits and to mundane prosocial behaviors. The present article reviews the recent literature showing that the strength of these relationships depends on the level of aggregation. Specifically, we demonstrate an increase in behavioral consistency after horizontal aggregation (across multiple game types), vertical aggregation (across multiple game variants), and a combination thereof. Moreover, we show that aggregation increases the magnitude of the relationships of game behavior with prosocial personality and mundane prosocial behavior. These findings illustrate that economic games can genuinely capture a core facet of human prosociality - but that their capacity for doing so is greater when multiple game behaviors are considered., Competing Interests: Conflict of interest statement Nothing declared., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

16. Is Trust for Sale? The Effectiveness of Financial Compensation for Repairing Competence- versus Integrity-Based Trust Violations.

Author

Haesevoets T, Reinders Folmer C, and Van Hiel A

Subjects
Behavior, Female, Humans, Male, Morals, Commerce, Compensation and Redress, Trust
Abstract

Despite the popularity of financial compensation as a means for addressing trust violations, the question whether (more) money can indeed buy trust back remains largely unexplored. In the present research, we focus on the role of violation type and compensation size. The results of a scenario study and a laboratory experiment show that financial compensation can effectively promote the restoration of trust for transgressions that indicate a lack of competence. Conversely, for transgressions which signal a lack of integrity, financial compensation is not an effective tool to repair trust. Moreover, our findings indicate that for both violation types, overcompensation has no positive effects on top of the impact of equal compensation. These findings therefore show that when it comes to trust, money cannot buy everything.

Published
2015
Full Text
View/download PDF

17. More Money, More Trust? Target and Observer Differences in the Effectiveness of Financial Overcompensation to Restore Trust.

Author

Haesevoets T, Reinders Folmer C, and Van Hiel A

Abstract

Recent research revealed that despite its financial costs, overcompensation is not more effective to restore trust in the perpetrator than equal compensation. In a lab experiment (N = 115), we compared the effects of these compensation sizes for both targets of the compensation and non-involved observers. It was revealed that overcompensation did not yield superior outcomes than equal compensation. Specifically, for targets overcompensation resulted in lower levels of trust than equal compensation, while for observers equal compensation and overcompensation resulted in similar levels of trust. This finding suggests that overcompensation is not a cost-effective trust repair strategy, neither for the targets nor for third party observers. Other implications are discussed as well.

Published
2014
Full Text
View/download PDF

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results