1. Screening Instrument for Dysphagia in People with an Intellectual Disability (SD-ID): Quick and Reliable Screening by Caregivers.
- Author
-
van der Woude, T. S., Schüller-Korevaar, R. M., Ulgiati, A.M., Pavlis-Maldonado, G.J., Hovenkamp-Hermelink, J.H.M., and Dekker, A.D.
- Subjects
- *
RESEARCH funding , *RESEARCH methodology evaluation , *INTELLECTUAL disabilities , *CAREGIVERS , *EXPERIMENTAL design , *RESEARCH methodology , *FOOD habits , *STATISTICAL reliability , *MEDICAL screening , *DEGLUTITION disorders , *DRINKING behavior , *INTER-observer reliability ,RESEARCH evaluation - Abstract
Background and Aim: Timely diagnosis of dysphagia is important for people with an intellectual disability. Periodic screening of each individual by speech-language therapists is barely feasible with respect to limited resources. Therefore, preselection of individuals with an increased dysphagia risk through screening by caregivers is crucial. Objective: This study aimed to develop the novel Screening instrument for Dysphagia for people with an Intellectual Disability (SD-ID). Methods: The SD-ID was developed, validated and optimised in two rounds. Version 3, consisting of nine risk factors and 20 items concerning eating/drinking behaviour, was thoroughly studied for feasibility, concurrent validity and reliability, and then optimised. Outcomes and Results: The SD-ID (version 3) was filled out in an average of four minutes (feasibility). A strong positive association was found between scores on SD-ID and Dysphagia Disorder Survey (concurrent validity). Test-retest and interrater reliability were very good. Two additional risk factors were added and two items removed to yield the final version 4. The most optimal cut-off score appeared to be either 4 or 5. Conclusions and Implications: The SD-ID is a reliable instrument to screen for an increased risk of dysphagia in people with an intellectual disability. Ideally it is part of a cyclic work process: Screening with SD-ID (step 1), diagnostic work-up if necessary (step 2), recommendations (step 3), and evaluation (step 4). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF