Search

Background and Aims: Ulcerative colitis [UC], a chronic inflammatory bowel disease, may manifest with symptoms of increased stool frequency [SF], rectal bleeding [RB], bowel urgency [BU], abdominal pain [AP], and fatigue. Mirikizumab, an anti-IL-23p19 antibody, demonstrated efficacy and safety in patients with moderately to severely active UC in the LUCENT Phase 3 trials. We evaluated mirikizumab's efficacy in achieving symptom control and time to symptom improvement during induction, maintenance of sustained symptom control, 'comprehensive symptom control', defined according to a combination of individual patient-reported outcomes, and prognostic baseline indicators of early symptomatic remission at Week 4., Methods: The results of LUCENT-1/-2 have previously been reported. Treatment differences for symptomatic endpoints were compared over 52 weeks versus placebo [PBO] and comprehensive symptomatic endpoints at 12 and 52 weeks of continuous treatment. Subgroup analyses were conducted for prior biologic or tofacitinib treatment failure. Prognostic analyses were run using regression analysis., Results: By Week [W] 2, mirikizumab-treated patients achieved greater reductions in SF, RB, BU, and fatigue versus PBO. At W4, there was a higher rate of AP improvement. At W12, a greater proportion of mirikizumab-treated patients achieved symptomatic remission, RB remission, SF remission, and BU remission/clinically meaningful improvement. Mirikizumab-treated patients sustained symptom control versus placebo patients in maintenance until W52. This treatment effect was shown in patients regardless of prior biologic or tofacitinib failure. Additionally, mirikizumab achieved comprehensive symptom control versus PBO at W12 and W52., Conclusions: Mirikizumab demonstrated efficacy in achieving and sustaining symptom control and comprehensive symptom control over 52 weeks [NCT03518086; NCT03524092]., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Background and Aims: The gut microbiota contributes to aberrant inflammation in inflammatory bowel disease, but the bacterial factors causing or exacerbating inflammation are not fully understood. Further, the predictive or prognostic value of gut microbial biomarkers for remission in response to biologic therapy is unclear., Methods: We perform whole metagenomic sequencing of 550 stool samples from 287 ulcerative colitis patients from a large, phase 3, head-to-head study of infliximab and etrolizumab., Results: We identify several bacterial species in baseline and/or post-treatment samples that associate with clinical remission. These include previously described associations [Faecalibacterium prausnitzii_F] as well as new associations with remission to biologic therapy [Flavonifractor plautii]. We build multivariate models and find that gut microbial species are better predictors for remission than clinical variables alone. Finally, we describe patient groups that differ in microbiome composition and remission rate after induction therapy, suggesting the potential utility of microbiome-based endotyping., Conclusions: In this large study of ulcerative colitis patients, we show that few individual species associate strongly with clinical remission, but multivariate models including microbiome can predict clinical remission and have better predictive power compared with clinical data alone., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Introduction: It is unclear if steroid tapering protocols can affect clinical trial outcomes in ulcerative colitis [UC], particularly fixed versus adaptive steroid tapering. Fixed steroid tapering involves incremental dose decreases at prespecified intervals, and adaptive steroid tapering uses investigator discretion as determined by the patient's response., Methods: In this post-hoc analysis from six clinical trials of UC [VARSITY, ACT 1, PURSUIT, GEMINI1, OCTAVE, and ULTRA2], responders to induction therapy with baseline corticosteroid use were considered as the primary population of interest. Adjustments were made to account for treat-through versus re-randomisation designs, and multivariate regression was performed to account for other potential confounding variables. The primary outcome was corticosteroid-free clinical remission [CR] at 1 year, and secondary outcomes were CR and endoscopic improvement., Results: There was a total of 861 patients who had achieved clinical response after induction and were using corticosteroids. Within multivariate analysis, patients using adaptive steroid tapering regimens were less likely to achieve corticosteroid-free CR at 1 year (odds ratio [OR] 0.66 [95% confidence interval, CI, 0.48-0.92], p = 0.015) but had increased odds for achieving CR at 1 year (OR 1.9 [95% CI 1.43-2.52], p < 0.001). The steroid tapering regimen was not associated with achievement of endoscopic improvement at 1 year., Conclusions: Among patients with UC on corticosteroids in clinical trials, patients using adaptive steroid weaning regimens were less likely to achieve corticosteroid-free CR at 1 year but more likely to achieve CR at 1 year. Consideration should be given to implementing mandatory fixed steroid weaning protocols in future clinical trials of UC., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Background and Aims: To demonstrate that administration of 7500 Trichuris suis ova [TSO] every second week over 24 weeks would reduce the intestinal inflammation in moderate ulcerative colitis., Methods: A single-centre, randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled, phase 2b clinical trial of 7500 Trichuris suis ova every 2 weeks for 24 weeks compared with placebo in moderate activity of ulcerative colitis [Mayo score 6-10] were performed. Primary outcome: clinical remission; secondary outcomes: clinical response at 24 weeks, complete corticosteroid-free clinical remission, endoscopic remission, symptomatic remission at 12 and 24 weeks, and partial Mayo score over time., Results: In all, 119 patients were randomised to Trichuris suis ova [n = 60] or placebo [n = 59]. At Week 24, clinical remission was achieved in 30% of Trichuris suis ova-treated vs 34% of placebo-treated (risk ratio [RR] = 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.52-1.50; p = 0.80, intention to treat). No difference was found in clinical response in any of the clinical response subgroups. However, in patients who did not need treatment with corticosteroids during the trial, a temporary effect of TSO was seen in the analysis of symptomatic remission at Week 12 [p = 0.01] and the partial Mayo score at Week 14 and Week 18 [p < 0.05 and p = 0.02]., Conclusions: Compared with placebo, Trichuris suis ova administration was not superior in achieving clinical remission at Week 24 in ulcerative colitis or in achieving clinical Mayo score reduction, complete corticosteroid-free clinical remission, or endoscopic remission. However, Trichuris suis ova treatment induced symptomatic temporary remission at Week 12., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background and Aims: To investigate if treatment with non-pooled, multidonor faecal microbiota transplantation [FMT] for 4 weeks was superior to placebo to induce clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis., Methods: The study was a randomised, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study with a 4-week intervention period and 12-month follow-up. Eligible patients with chronic pouchitis were recruited from five Danish hospitals. Participants were randomised to non-pooled, multidonor FMT derived from four faecal donors, or placebo. Treatment was delivered daily by enema for 2 weeks, followed by every second day for 2 weeks. Disease severity was accessed at inclusion and 30-day follow-up, using the Pouchitis Disease Activity Index [PDAI]; PDAI <7 was considered equivalent to clinical remission. Faecal samples from participants and donors were analysed by shotgun metagenomic sequencing., Results: Inclusion was stopped after inclusion of 30 participants who were randomised 1:1 for treatment with FMT or placebo. There was no difference in participants achieving clinical remission between the two groups at 30-day follow-up, relative risk 1.0 (95% CI [0.55; 1.81]). Treatment with FMT resulted in a clinically relevant increase in adverse events compared with placebo, incidence rate ratio 1.67 (95% CI [1.10; 2.52]); no serious adverse events within either group. Faecal microbiota transplantation statistically significantly increased the similarity of participant faecal microbiome to the faecal donor microbiome at 30-day follow-up [p = 0.01], which was not seen after placebo., Conclusions: Non-pooled, multidonor FMT was comparable to placebo in inducing clinical remission in patients with chronic pouchitis, but showed a clinically relevant increase in adverse events compared with placebo. ClincialTrials.gov number, NCT04100291., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

This brief communication describes the concept of physiofriendly pharmacotherapy for type 2 diabetes mellitus. Physio-friendly therapy is defined as that which restores metabolic, including glycaemic and weight homoeostasis, to near normal levels. Drugs such as glucagon like peptide 1 receptor agonists (GLP1RA), sodium glucose cotransporter- 2 inhibitors (SGLT2i), and alfa glucosidase inhibitors, along with metformin, work in a physio-friendly manner and may facilitate remission. Thus, they can also be termed as remission-facilitating drugs.

Background: Patency capsule (PC) ingestion is commonly used to minimize capsule retention in high-risk patients with Crohn's disease (CD). However, false-positive rates remain high, precluding the use of video capsule endoscopy (VCE). We aimed to compare the efficacy of two preparation protocols in reducing failed PC rates in patients with CD., Methods: This bi-center retrospective case-control study included adult patients with small-bowel CD in clinical remission who underwent PC ingestion. The pro-motility group followed a low-residue diet, then a clear fluid diet, and took bisacodyl after ingestion, while the control group followed only a clear fluid diet. The primary outcome was failed PC, defined as the absence of PC excretion or presence on abdominal X-ray at 30 h post-ingestion. Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of failed PC., Results: Among 273 patients (83 in the pro-motility group, 190 controls), the pro-motility group was older (median 36 [27-48] vs. 31 [24-43], p = 0.012) and had a lower rate of B2/3 disease phenotype (32.5 vs. 53.1%, p = 0.002) compared to controls. The pro-motility group also had a lower failed PC rate (12.0 vs. 24.7%, p = 0.023). Longer disease duration (adjusted odds ratio (AOR) 1.053, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.016-1.091, p = 0.005) increased the odds of failed PC, while the pro-motility protocol was protective (AOR 0.438, 95% CI 0.200-0.956, p = 0.038), outweighing the influence of B2/3 disease phenotype (AOR 1.743, 95% CI 0.912-3.332, p = 0.093)., Conclusions: The pro-motility preparation protocol could substantially improve the success rates of the small-bowel patency test in patients with CD undergoing PC ingestion, potentially reducing the risk of capsule retention and associated complications., Competing Interests: Declarations Conflict of interest Shomron Ben-Horin has received Advisory board and/or consulting fees from Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Celltrion, Pfizer, GSK, Ferring, Novartis, Roche, Gilead, NeoPharm, Predicta Med, Galmed, Medial Earlysign, BMS and Eli Lilly, holds stocks/options in Predicta Med, Evinature & Galmed, and received research support from Abbvie, Takeda, Janssen, Celltrion, Pfizer, & Galmed. Uri Kopylov received speaker and advisory fees: Abbvie, BMS, Celtrion, Janssen, Medronic, Pfizer, Roche, Takeda, Elly Lili, research support: Janssen, Medtronic, Takeda, Elly Lili Abbvie BMS. Rami Eliakim received consultant and speaker fees from Janssen, Abbvie, Takeda and Medtronic. Eva Niv received consultant fees from Medtronic. Nitsan Maharshak has received speaking and/ or consulting fees from Pfizer, Abbvie, Lilly, Takeda, Janssen, Ferring, BiomX, BMS, Nestle, Trobix Innovation, Teva and grant support from Takeda, Janssen, Abbott, Abbvie, Pfizer, BMS, Corundum Innovation Ltd, Nestle. Ayal Hirsch has received speaking honoraria from Perigo, Padagis, Janssen, Abbvie, Takeda and received grants from Janssen, Takeda and Abbvie. Tamar Thurm has received lecture fee from Takada. Liat Deutsch has previously received payment for consulting and/or lecturing services from Medtronic, Neopharm, Abbott, Abbvie, and Fresenius Kabi. The remaining authors (Offir Ukashi, Arad Dotan, Tom Borkovsky, Adi Talan Asher, Moshe Leshno) declare that they have no conflicts of interest. Ethical approval This study was carried out in accordance with the ethical guidelines of the Declaration of Helsinki. The study was approved by the Sheba Medical Center ethics committee and the Tel-Aviv Sourasky Medical Center ethics committee. Approval was granted for Helsinki protocol SMC-13-0218 (July 2nd, 2013), SMC-18-4945 (June 26th, 2018) and TLV-0032-23 (March 26th, 2023) and TLV-0292-19 TLV-0292-19 (Sep. 4th, 2019). Since this was a retrospective case–control study, no informed consent was obtained for this specific analysis. However, informed consent was obtained from patients who were part of the prospective cohorts of this study., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: For patients with psoriasis, discontinuation of biologics following remission has become more common in daily practice., Objective: We aimed to identify predictors and construct a predictive model for time to relapse following withdrawal from biologics., Methods: This 12-year, multicenter, observational cohort study was performed in six dermatology centers between February 2011 and February 2024. We identified biological treatment episodes in patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and included only treatment episodes in which a clinical response (≥ 50% reduction in Psoriasis Area and Severity Index score [PASI 50] from baseline) was achieved and the patient withdrew from biological therapy with a well-controlled status (PASI < 10 and ≥ 50% improvement in PASI from baseline). The primary outcome was time to relapse, which was defined as the period from the last biologic administration to relapse. An extended multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis (Prentice-Williams-Peterson Gap time model) was used to predict relapse and generate a predictive model., Results: This study screened 1613 biological treatment episodes, and 991 treatment episodes were enrolled. The time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment increased (p < 0.001). Similarly, the time to relapse decreased significantly as the number of previous biologics used increased (p < 0.001). The maximum PASI improvement during biological treatment decreased and the PASI score at withdrawal of biological treatment increased in parallel as the number of prior withdrawals from biologics increased. The time to relapse following withdrawal was longest for interleukin (IL)-23 inhibitors (IL-23i), followed by the IL-12/23i, IL-17 inhibitors (IL-17i), and tumor necrosis factor-α inhibitors. After adjustment, multivariate Cox regression identified the following significant predictors of relapse following withdrawal: the mechanisms of action of biologics (hazard ratio [HR] for IL-17i vs IL-12/23i, 1.59; HR for IL-23i vs IL-12/23i, 0.60), number of previous withdrawals from biological treatment (HR 1.23; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.13‒1.33), time to achieve PASI 50 (HR 1.01; 95% CI 1.00‒1.02), maximum PASI improvement on biologics (HR 0.98; 95% CI 0.98‒0.99), and PASI at the end of therapy (HR 1.03; 95% CI 1.01‒1.05). The model had good predictive and discriminative ability., Conclusions: These results have the potential to help physicians and patients make individualized treatment decisions; information on the risk of relapse of psoriasis at specific timepoints following the withdrawal of biologics is particularly valuable for patients considering discontinuation of biologics or as-needed biologic therapy. However, the benefit and risk of repeated withdrawals of biologics should be carefully weighed, as the treatment efficacy and duration of remission decline as the number of withdrawals increases., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature Switzerland AG.)

Background and Aims: In autoimmune hepatitis, achieving complete biochemical remission (CBR) with current weight-based thiopurine dosing is challenging. We investigated whether patients could be stratified regarding CBR according to a target range of thiopurine metabolites. Moreover, we explored the effects of azathioprine dosage increases and co-therapy of allopurinol with low-dose thiopurines on metabolite profiles and treatment response., Approach and Results: The relation between metabolites and treatment response was assessed in 337 individuals from 4 European centers. In a global, cross-sectional analysis, active metabolites 6-thioguanine nucleotides (6TGN) were similar in those with and without CBR. However, analyzing patients with sequential measurements over 4 years (N = 146) revealed higher average 6TGN levels in those with stable CBR (260 pmol/0.2 mL) compared to those failing to maintain CBR (181 pmol/0.2 mL; p = 0.0014) or never achieving CBR (153 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001), with an optimal 6TGN cutoff of ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL (sensitivity: 76% and specificity: 78%). Only 42% exhibited 6TGN ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL following weight-based dosing, as doses weakly correlated with 6TGN but with 6-methylmercaptopurine (6MMP), a metabolite associated with toxicity. Azathioprine dose increases led to preferential 6MMP formation (+127% vs. 6TGN +34%; p < 0.0001). Conversely, adding allopurinol to thiopurines in difficult-to-treat patients (N = 36) raised 6TGN (168→321 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001) and lowered 6MMP (2125→184 pmol/0.2 mL; p < 0.0001), resulting in improved transaminases in all patients and long-term CBR in 75%., Conclusions: Maintaining CBR in autoimmune hepatitis was associated with 6TGN ≥223 pmol/0.2 mL. For patients who fail to achieve CBR and therapeutic 6TGN levels despite thiopurine dose increase due to preferential 6MMP formation, comedication of allopurinol alongside low-dose thiopurines represents an efficient alternative., (Copyright © 2024 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Glucocorticoids (GCs) are still the mainstay of treatment of giant cell arteritis (GCA). Although GCs are highly effective in GCA, the high burden of toxicity of GCs as well as the disease relapse during GC tapering is well documented. To compare the efficacy and rapidity of TCZ and MTX as steroid-sparing agents in a real-life cohort of GCA patients. A retrospective analysis was conducted including patients with newly diagnosed GCA from the Rheumatology Units of Udine and Rome. The inclusion criterion was the treatment with TCZ or MTX as first steroid-sparing drug. 112 GCA patients (81 females) with a median age of 70 (IQ 65-75) years were collected. Thirty-one out of 112 (27.7%) patients were treated with TCZ (162 mg/week), while 81/112 (72.3%) patients received MTX (up to 20 mg/week) as a GC-sparing agent. At month 6 after GCA onset, 5/31 (16.1%) patients in TCZ group and none in MTX group were in GC-free sustained remission (p value = 0.001). Similarly, at month 12, 64.5% (20/31) and 11.1% (9/81) of patients were in sustained GC-free remission in TCZ and MTX group, respectively (p value <0.001). At month 24 of follow-up, at least one relapse of the disease occurred in 7/31 (22.6%) in TCZ-treated and 28/81 (34.6%) in MTX-treated patients, respectively (p value = 0.22). TCZ allowed a faster discontinuation of steroid therapy than MTX in GCA patients, without increasing the risk of relapse., Competing Interests: Declarations. Conflict of interest: The authors declare that they have no competing interest. Consent for publication: All authors have approved the version to be published. Ethics approval and consent to participate: All the procedures that contributed to this work complied with the ethical standards of the national and institutional committees responsible for human experimentation and the Declaration of Helsinki of 1975, revised in 2008. Patients signed an informed consent for the use of their data for research purposes. The study was approved by the Department of Medicine Institutional Review Board (IRB) (Prot. 169/2022)., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objective: To review the pharmacologic and clinical profile of mirikizumab in the treatment of moderate to severe ulcerative colitis (UC)., Data Sources: A PubMed search was performed from inception to December 2023 using keywords mirikizumab, interleukin-23 inhibitor , and UC . Information was also obtained from package inserts as well as published abstracts., Study Selection and Data Extraction: Phase 3 studies plus relevant literature on mirikizumab pharmacologic and clinical profile were reviewed., Data Synthesis: Mirikizumab approval was based on LUCENT-1 and LUCENT-2. In the phase 3 studies involving patients with moderate to severe UC, mirikizumab, when compared to placebo, resulted in clinical remission in a significantly higher proportion of patients in both the induction and maintenance phase. In addition, mirikizumab met the secondary endpoints of alternate definition of clinical remission, endoscopic remission, glucocorticoid-free clinical remission, histologic-endoscopic mucosal remission, and improvement in bowel urgency status, bowel-urgency remission, and maintenance of clinical remission. Common adverse events noted include infection (15.1%), injection-site reaction (8.7%), nasopharyngitis (7.2%), and headache (3.3%)., Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice in Comparison to Existing Agents: Mirikizumab is the first selective interleukin 23 (IL-23) inhibitor approved for UC. Additional studies are required to determine how to position mirikizumab in both biologic-naïve and biologic-experienced patients with moderate to severe UC., Conclusion: Mirikizumab provides a novel mechanism of action for the treatment of moderate to severe UC and is another welcomed treatment advance in the treatment arsenal, providing a more selective mechanism of action while maintaining a comparable safety profile., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: DC has served on the speaker bureau for Janssen Pharmaceuticals and has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, and Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals. SB has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, Prometheus Laboratories, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Boehringer Ingelheim. HS has no conflicts of interest to declare.

Background: Both vedolizumab and ustekinumab can be considered for the treatment of ulcerative colitis [UC], but head-to-head trials are lacking., Aim: We aimed to compare the effectiveness of vedolizumab and ustekinumab after anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] failure in UC patients., Patients and Methods: In this multicentre study, we included consecutive adult patients with UC, with partial Mayo score >2 and prior anti-TNF exposure, treated with vedolizumab or ustekinumab between January 2019 and August 2022. Comparisons were performed using propensity score analyses [inverse probability of treatment weighting]., Results: Among a total of 293 patients included, 151 and 142 received vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively. After propensity score analysis, steroid-free clinical remission [SFCR] [partial Mayo score ≤2] was achieved at week 16 in 38.0% and 40.3% of patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab, respectively (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.11, 95% confidence interval [0.39-3.13], p = 0.85). Rates of SFCR in patients exposed to one, two, and three lines of biologics/small molecules among patients treated with vedolizumab and ustekinumab were respectively 53.3% vs 62.1% [p = 0.52], 44.4% vs 33.8% [p = 0.52], and 2.6% vs 19.1% [p = 0.027]. Endoscopic remission [SFCR and endoscopic Mayo score ≤1] and histological remission [SFCR, endoscopic remission, and Nancy histological index ≤1] at week 16 were achieved in respectively 5.3% vs 17.5% (aOR = 3.77 [1.25-11.36], p = 0.018) and 2.1% vs 11.1% (aOR = 5.85 [1.47-23.30], p = 0.012) in the vedolizumab and ustekinumab groups. No difference regarding the risk of drug discontinuation between the two groups (aHR = 1.03 [0.51-2.08], p = 0.92) was observed. While no factor was identified for vedolizumab, primary failure to at least one biologic/small molecule (OR = 0.31 [0.11-0.82], p = 0.018) was significantly associated with a decreased rate of SFCR among patients treated with ustekinumab., Conclusion: While no difference in terms of short-term clinical remission was observed, ustekinumab appears to be more effective than vedolizumab in inducing endoscopic and histological remission at week 16 after failure of anti-TNFs in UC., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Brexucabtagene autoleucel (brexu-cel) is an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy approved in the USA and European Union (EU) for adults with relapsed or refractory B-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (R/R B-ALL; aged ≥26 years in EU). Here, outcomes for patients with R/R B-ALL aged ≥26 years in ZUMA-3 treated with brexu-cel were compared with historical standard-of-care (SOC) therapy. After median follow-up of 26.8 months, the overall complete remission (CR) rate among patients treated with brexu-cel in Phase 2 ( N  = 43) was 72% and median overall survival (OS) was 25.4 months (95% CI, 15.9-NE). Median OS was improved in Phase 2 patients versus matched historical SOC-treated patients. Compared with aggregate historical trial data, Phase 1 and 2 patients had improved OS versus blinatumomab, inotuzumab, and chemotherapy in a matching-adjusted indirect comparison (MAIC) study. These data demonstrate clinical benefit of brexu-cel relative to SOC in patients ≥26 years with R/R B-ALL.

Background: Risankizumab is efficacious and well tolerated in adults with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD)., Aim: To evaluate the corticosteroid-sparing effect of risankizumab in CD., Methods: During the 12-week induction period, patients maintained stable baseline corticosteroid doses, up to 20 mg/day prednisone or equivalent. At week 0 of maintenance, a mandatory corticosteroid taper was started. This post hoc analysis evaluated corticosteroid-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes at week 52 of maintenance; safety was also assessed., Results: Of 889 patients randomised to induction with risankizumab 600 mg or placebo, 285 (32.1%) were taking baseline concomitant corticosteroids. Week 12 clinical remission and endoscopic response rates were greater for risankizumab 600 mg versus placebo, regardless of concomitant corticosteroid use. At week 52, 66.7%, 50.0% and 41.2% of patients taking risankizumab 180 mg, risankizumab 360 mg and (withdrawal) placebo, respectively, discontinued corticosteroids. Week 52 corticosteroid-free clinical remission per stool frequency/abdominal pain score (risankizumab 180 mg [42.7%] or 360 mg [49.8%]; [withdrawal] placebo [39.0%]), corticosteroid-free clinical remission per Crohn's Disease Activity Index (risankizumab 180 mg [51.0%] or 360 mg [49.5%]; [withdrawal] placebo [40.2%]), and corticosteroid-free endoscopic response (risankizumab 180 mg [44.6%] or 360 mg [44.7%]; [withdrawal] placebo [20.7%]) rates were greater for risankizumab than placebo. Adverse event rates were generally similar, regardless of baseline corticosteroid use., Conclusions: Efficacy of risankizumab 600 mg induction therapy was independent of concomitant corticosteroid use. Risankizumab 180 and 360 mg maintenance therapy yielded high rates of corticosteroid-free clinical and endoscopic outcomes at week 52., (© 2024 The Author(s). Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background: Levamisole is less expensive and has a better toxicity profile compared to other steroid sparing agents used in nephrotic syndrome. It has a plasma half-life of 2.0 to 5.6 hours, but is conventionally administered on alternate days. We aimed to assess whether daily levamisole is safe and more effective than standard alternate-day therapy in maintaining remission in children with frequently relapsing or steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (FR/SDNS)., Methods: An open-label randomized controlled trial was conducted in children with FR/SDNS. Group A received daily while Group B received alternate-day levamisole (2-3 mg/kg/dose) for 12 months. Prednisolone was tapered off by 3 months. Patients were monitored for relapses, further steroid requirement, and adverse effects., Results: A total of 190 children with FR/SDNS (94 in Group A and 96 in Group B) were analyzed. Sustained remission for 12 months was observed in 36% of Group A and 27% of Group B patients (p = 0.18). Numbers completing 12 months in the study were 67% in Group A and 56% in Group B (p = 0.13). Time to first relapse, persistent FR/SDNS, and withdrawal due to poor compliance were statistically similar in both groups, while relapse rate and cumulative steroid dosage were significantly lower in Group A compared to Group B (p = 0.03 and p = 0.02, respectively). The incidence of adverse effects was comparable in both groups, with reversible leucopenia and hepatic transaminitis being the commonest., Conclusions: Daily levamisole therapy was not superior to alternate-day therapy in maintaining sustained remission over 12 months. Nevertheless, relapse rate and cumulative steroid dosage were significantly lower without increased adverse effects., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Pediatric Nephrology Association.)

Background: The efficacy of rituximab in steroid-resistant nephrotic syndrome (SRNS) is controversial. We previously reported that rituximab in combination with methylprednisolone pulse therapy (MPT) and immunosuppressants was associated with favorable outcomes. We determined risk factors for poor response following rituximab treatment, which remains unknown., Methods: This retrospective study included 45 patients with childhood-onset SRNS treated with rituximab across four pediatric kidney facilities. Treatment effects were categorized as complete remission (CR), partial remission (PR), and no remission (NR) at one year after rituximab treatment. The primary outcome was the rate of CR, PR, and NR. Risk factors for non-CR were calculated with multivariate logistic regression. Adverse events and the relationship between disease status at one year and long-term prognosis were also evaluated., Results: The rates of CR, PR, and NR at one year were 69%, 24%, and 7%, respectively. The median time from rituximab administration to CR was 90 days. The median follow-up period after rituximab administration was 7.4 years. In multivariate analysis, significant risk factors for poor response were the pathologic finding of focal segmental glomerular sclerosis and a long interval between SRNS diagnosis and rituximab administration. The rates of CR were 90.3% and 21.4% in patients receiving rituximab within and after 6 months following SRNS diagnosis, respectively (p < 0.001). Five patients developed chronic kidney disease stage G5, including 2 of the 11 patients with PR and all 3 patients with NR, whereas none of the 31 patients with CR developed chronic kidney disease stage G5., Conclusion: Early administration of rituximab in combination with MPT and immunosuppressants might achieve favorable outcomes in patients with SRNS., (© 2024. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to International Pediatric Nephrology Association.)

Objective: To review the pharmacologic and clinical profile of etrasimod in the treatment of ulcerative colitis (UC)., Data Sources: A PubMed search was conducted from inception to November 2023 using the keywords etrasimod , ulcerative colitis , and sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulator . Information was also obtained from published abstracts and package insert., Study Selection and Data Extraction: Phase 2 and 3 studies plus relevant literature on etrasimod pharmacologic and clinical profile were reviewed., Data Synthesis: Per ELEVATE, 2 phase 3 studies, a higher proportion of patients with moderately to severely active UC achieved clinical remission in the induction and maintenance phase with etrasimod compared with placebo. In addition, a higher proportion of patients achieved secondary endpoints of clinical response, endoscopic improvement-histologic remission, corticosteroid-free remission, and endoscopic improvement with etrasimod vs placebo. Common adverse events include anemia and headache., Relevance to Patient Care and Clinical Practice in Comparison With Existing Drugs: Etrasimod is now the second orally administered sphingosine-1-phosphate modulator approved for UC, providing patients with additional treatment options. Efficacy rates of this treatment are in line with other UC medication options. Similar to other sphingosine-1-phosphate receptor modulators, various assessments are required at baseline and during treatment to ensure safe and appropriate use., Conclusion: Etrasimod is another possibility in the armamentarium of UC treatment, providing patients with more oral medication options. Prior to treatment initiation, several assessments relating to safety, drug interactions, and pharmacogenomics factors are advised., Competing Interests: Declaration of Conflicting InterestsThe authors declared the following potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article: David Choi has served on the speaker bureau for Janssen Pharmaceuticals. David Choi has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, and Boehringer Ingelheim, Abbvie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals. Shubha Bhat has served as a consultant to Bristol Myers Squibb, Prometheus Laboratories, Pfizer, AbbVie, and Boehringer Ingelheim. Michelle Becker and Marina Ivanov have no conflicts of interest.

Objectives: To analyze the impact of different patterns of healthcare delivery on remission of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) patients treated with targeted therapies during the first wave (2020) and second/third waves (2021) of the pandemic compared to the pre-pandemic period (2019)., Methods: In this observational real-life study, data from RA patients treated with biologic or targeted synthetic drugs were extracted from a longitudinal registry. Clinical Disease Activity Index (CDAI) was analyzed in the same period from the 22nd of February to the 18th of May for three consecutive years. These three periods were characterized by different patterns of healthcare delivery: (1) before the pandemic (2019) only in-person visits, (2) during the first wave (2020) both in-person visits and telehealth, and (3) during the second/third waves (2021) only in-person visits. A generalized linear model with the binomial error was fitted to evaluate the difference in the proportion of patients in CDAI remission. Quantile regression was used to compare the median of CDAI in difficult-to-treat (D2T) patients., Results: In the three periods, we included 407, 450, and 540 RA patients respectively. The percentages of patients in CDAI remission were similar in the three periods (prevalence ratio 1.07, p value 0.423 between 2020 and 2019, and 1.01, p-value 0.934 between 2021 and 2019). The CDAI remission rate was 40.55% ( N  = 163), 43.18% ( N  = 155) and 40.82% ( N  = 220) in 2019, 2020 and 2021, respectively. Among our cohort of D2T patients, CDAI remission was similar across the three periods ( N  = 30, 22.22%; N  = 27, 23.68%; and N  = 34, 21.52% respectively)., Conclusion: Although the pandemic has imposed changes in our healthcare delivery, these different strategies seem to be effective in ensuring satisfactory management of RA treated with targeted therapies. The approaches modulated in the context of the different periods have been a feasible compensation for ensuring disease control even in D2T patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of conflicting interestsThe author(s) declared no potential conflicts of interest with respect to the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Since 1980's, the established/standard treatment of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is cytarabine infusion with anthracycline (7 + 3 regimen). We compared the 7 + 3 regimen in older secondary/high-risk AML patients from a clinical trial with a matched population from the Swedish AML Registry treated with an increased cytarabine dose in induction and consolidation as recommended in the Swedish National Guidelines since 2005. After successful propensity score matching, 104 patients per group were included. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS), and standard dosed patients had a median OS of 6.4 versus 10.7 months with increased dose intensity (hazard ratio: 0.69, p  = 0.012), with 5-year OS of 8.7% and 18.1%, and remission rates of 36% and 60%, respectively ( p  < 0.001). Median OS after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (in 27.9% per group) was 10.4 and 20.7 months, respectively. We conclude that the more intensive cytarabine schedule seems to provide improved outcomes inthe investigated AML patient group.

Background: Tulisokibart is a tumor necrosis factor-like cytokine 1A (TL1A) monoclonal antibody in development for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. A genetic-based diagnostic test was designed to identify patients with an increased likelihood of response., Methods: We randomly assigned patients with glucocorticoid dependence or failure of conventional or advanced therapies for ulcerative colitis to receive intravenous tulisokibart (1000 mg on day 1 and 500 mg at weeks 2, 6, and 10) or placebo. Cohort 1 included patients regardless of status with respect to the test for likelihood of response. Cohort 2 included only patients with a positive test for likelihood of response. The primary analysis was performed in cohort 1; the primary end point was clinical remission at week 12. Patients with a positive test for likelihood of response from cohorts 1 and 2 were combined in prespecified analyses., Results: In cohort 1, a total of 135 patients underwent randomization. A significantly higher percentage of patients who received tulisokibart had clinical remission than those who received placebo (26% vs. 1%; difference, 25 percentage points; 95% confidence interval [CI], 14 to 37; P<0.001). In cohort 2, a total of 43 patients underwent randomization. A total of 75 patients with a positive test for likelihood of response underwent randomization across both cohorts. Among patients with a positive test for likelihood of response (cohorts 1 and 2 combined), clinical remission occurred in a higher percentage of patients who received tulisokibart than in those who received placebo (32% vs. 11%; difference, 21 percentage points; 95% CI, 2 to 38; P = 0.02). Among all the enrolled patients, the incidence of adverse events was similar in the tulisokibart and placebo groups; most adverse events were mild to moderate in severity., Conclusions: In this short-term trial, tulisokibart was more effective than placebo in inducing clinical remission in patients with moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. (Funded by Prometheus Biosciences, a subsidiary of Merck; ARTEMIS-UC ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT04996797.)., (Copyright © 2024 Massachusetts Medical Society.)

Recent advancements in the treatment landscape of ulcerative colitis (UC) have ushered in a new era of possibilities, particularly with the introduction of Janus kinase (JAK)-signal transducer and activator of transcription inhibitors. These novel agents offer a paradigm shift in UC management by targeting key signaling pathways involved in inflammatory processes. With approved JAK inhibitors (JAKis), such as tofacitinib, filgotinib, and upadacitinib, clinicians now have powerful tools to modulate immune responses and gene expression, potentially revolutionizing the treatment algorithm for UC. Clinical trials have demonstrated the efficacy of JAKis in inducing and maintaining remission, presenting viable options for patients who have failed conventional therapies. Real-world data support the use of JAKis not only as first-line treatments but also in subsequent lines of therapy, particularly in patients with aggressive disease phenotypes or refractory to biologic agents. The rapid onset of action and potency of JAKis have broadened the possibilities in the management strategies of UC, offering timely relief for patients with active disease and facilitating personalized treatment approaches. Despite safety concerns, including cardiovascular risks and infections, ongoing research and post-marketing surveillance will continue to refine our understanding of the risk-benefit profile of JAKis in UC management., Competing Interests: Conflict-of-interest statement: The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (©The Author(s) 2024. Published by Baishideng Publishing Group Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To investigate the efficacy and safety of belimumab in the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) in a real-world setting and provide a valuable reference for clinical treatment., Methods: In this retrospective study, 101 patients with SLE who came to our hospital from March 2020 to September 2022, 56 of whom with lupus nephritis (LN), were selected. All patients received belimumab in combination with standard of care(SoC)therapy regimen for more than 52 weeks and their clinical/laboratory data, assessment of disease activity, glucocorticoids dosage and occurrence of adverse events were recorded. Lupus Low Disease Activity State (LLDAS) and DORIS remission as a primary goal in the treatment of SLE. The groups were classified according to the Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index 2000 (SLEDAI-2 K): SLEDAI-2 K < 6 was categorized as the mild group (mild activity) and SLEDAI-2 K ≥ 6 was categorized as the active group (moderate-severe activity). The disease of the two groups mentioned above were assessed using the SELENA-SLEDAI Flare Index (SFI) and the SLE Responder Index-4 (SRI-4), respectively. Furthermore, we used complete remission (CR) and partial remission (PR) in the kidney as the standard for efficacy evaluation for LN patients., Results: After 52 weeks of treatment with belimumab, patients' complement levels increased significantly (p < 0.05); Other indicators such as 24-hour urine protein quantification and daily glucocorticoids dose decreased compared to pretreatment (p < 0.05). At 52 weeks, (i) after evaluation, the whole group of patients showed significant improvement in their condition; (ii) 55.4% of patients achieved LLDAS and 23.8% achieved DORIS remission; (iii) 73.2% of patients with LN achieved CR, 16.1% achieved PR. Adverse reactions were observed in 15 patients (14.9%), all of which normalized after symptomatic treatment., Conclusions: In general, during treatment with belimumab, immunological and biochemical indices improved in SLE patients, urinary protein levels were reduced in LN patients, and the rate of renal function remission was effectively increased; At the same time, the use of belimumab is associated with a low frequency of side effects, good overall tolerability and a favorable safety profile., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

DNA-hypomethylating agents (HMAs) induce notable remission rates in AML/MDS patients with TP53 mutations; however, secondary resistance often develops rapidly. In the DECIDER trial (NCT00867672), elderly AML patients (also those with adverse genetics) randomized to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA) added to decitabine (DEC) attained significantly delayed time-to-resistance. An 82-year-old patient with a non-disruptive, in-frame TP53 mutation (p.Cys238&#95;Asn239delinsTyr, VAF 90%) and complex-monosomal karyotype attained a complete hematologic and cytogenetic remission with DEC + ATRA, with 3.7 years survival after 30 treatment cycles that were well-tolerated. Further HMA + ATRA studies appear warranted in AML/MDS patients of different genetic risk groups ineligible for more intensive treatment.Trial registration: This trial was registered at ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00867672., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Objectives: Multiple studies in patients with Crohn's disease (CD) treated with anti-tumor necrosis factor alpha agents have shown that proactive therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) during the maintenance phase leads to improved outcomes. We aimed to assess whether accelerated (IFX) administration during induction resulted in improved outcomes., Methods: This retrospective study included CD patients aged 5-17.9 years that were treated with IFX. We compared outcomes of patients treated during induction with 5-8 mg/kg dosing at Weeks 0, 2, 6, and 14 (Group 1), versus accelerated dosing (≥8 mg/kg and/or >4 infusions until Week 14, Group 2) of IFX. Primary outcome was steroid-free clinical remission by Week 52., Results: Sixty-eight patients were included, of whom seven discontinued IFX before Week 14, due to infusion reactions, immunogenic failure, or primary nonresponse. Comparison of Group 1 (n = 25) and Group 2 (n = 36) showed similar clinical characteristics, as well as inflammatory markers, at IFX initiation. Despite receiving significantly more IFX, and reaching a higher trough level by Week 14 (10.3 ± 1.2 vs. 3.3 ± 0.7, p < 0.001), the median Pediatric Crohn's disease Activity Index (PCDAI) was slightly higher in Group 2 versus Group 1 (14 [5-20] vs. 5 [0-15], p = 0.02). However, at Weeks 26 and 52 the PCDAI and inflammatory markers were comparable between the groups. Moreover, about 70% in both groups achieved the desirable trough IFX levels by Week 52., Conclusion: Accelerated IFX dosing during induction did not result in improved outcomes up to 12 months follow-up. Prospective studies are required to determine the exact timing in which proactive TDM should be applied., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

SERENE CD (NCT02065570) evaluated whether a higher adalimumab induction dose would improve patients with Crohn disease response and suggested a flat dose-response relationship for efficacy in the induction study. We investigated exposure-response relationships in induction and maintenance studies considering patients' baseline characteristics. Adalimumab exposures were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model. Efficacy end points (clinical remission/endoscopic response) at Weeks 4, 12, and 56 were evaluated in exposure-response analyses using multivariable logistic regression. Analyses showed an increasing trend with heterogeneity between induction regimens, which suggested that average concentration has an impact on coprimary efficacy end points within each group, but data did not fit a single-response curve. Although higher concentrations within arms were associated with improved outcomes, increasing the concentration through a higher induction dose was not associated with increasing clinical remission/endoscopic response at Week 4/12. A model including inverse effective clearance eliminated heterogeneity and described trends across induction regimens with a single curve. In the maintenance study, the response rates at Week 56 showed no heterogeneity. In the induction study, patients with lower effective adalimumab clearance responded better, whereas in the maintenance study average concentration drove primary efficacy end points at Week 56. Research extending these findings to other indications is needed., (© 2024, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

SERENE UC (NCT02065622) evaluated whether a higher adalimumab induction regimen improved patients with ulcerative colitis (UC) response, but a flat dose-response relationship was found in the induction study. We investigated exposure-response (ER) relationships in induction and maintenance studies considering patients' baseline characteristics. Adalimumab exposures were simulated using the established population pharmacokinetic model. Multivariable logistic regressions were used to assess the efficacy endpoints (clinical remission, endoscopic remission, endoscopic improvement) at weeks 8 and 52. In the induction study, an increasing ER trend with heterogeneity between induction regimens was shown, suggesting average concentration (C avg ) had a significant impact on primary efficacy endpoints within each group. However, data were not described by a single ER curve. Using inverse effective clearance as the exposure metric described trends across induction regimens with a single curve. Patients with inherently lower effective adalimumab clearance responded better. The patient response rates at week 52 showed no heterogeneity. A short-term increase in adalimumab dose did not drive better responses for induction, and apparent ER relationships were better explained by patient-inherent lower clearance. Conversely, during maintenance up to week 52, increasing the concentration via dose translated to better responses more robustly. The ER findings for SERENE UC were consistent with SERENE CD., (© 2024, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of belimumab combined with the standard regimen in treating children with active lupus nephritis. This single-center, retrospective cohort study used clinical data of children with newly active lupus nephritis hospitalized in the Department of Nephrology between December 2004 and February 2023. Patients were divided into a belimumab or traditional treatment group according to whether or not they received belimumab. Renal remission and recurrence rates and glucocorticoid dose were compared between groups. Forty-seven children (median age 11 years) were enrolled, including 30 and 17 children in the traditional treatment and belimumab groups, respectively. The Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Disease Activity Index-2000 (SLEDAI-2000) score of children in the belimumab group (23.59 ± 7.78) was higher than that in the traditional treatment group (19.13 ± 6.10) (P = 0.035). The two groups showed no significant difference in the frequency of pyuria, gross hematuria, and the levels of 24-h proteinuria and estimated glomerular filtration rate. The complement C3/C4 in the belimumab group recovered faster than that in the traditional treatment group (P < 0.05). There were no between-group differences in the complete renal remission rate at 6 or 12 months (P = 0.442, P = 0.759). There were no between-group differences in 1-year recurrence rate (P = 0.303). Furthermore, 6 and 12 months after treatment, glucocorticoid doses were lower in the belimumab than the traditional treatment group (17.87 ± 6.96 mg/d vs. 27.33 ± 8.40 mg/d, P = 0.000; 10.00 (5.3) mg/d vs. 13.75 (10.0) mg/d, P = 0.007), respectively., Conclusion: With an equivalent renal remission rate, belimumab combined with the standard traditional regimen might promote the tapering of glucocorticoids, and the incidence of adverse events is low., What Is Known: • Belimumab is documented as an adjunctive treatment with systemic lupus erythematosus (c-SLE) LN with efficacy. • Due to the paucity of studies, its effects and side effects in children with LN remain unclear., What Is New: • This single-center, retrospective cohort study evaluated the efficacy and safety of belimumab combined with the standard regimen in treating children with proliferative LN. • Belimumab combined with the standard traditional treatment might promote the tapering of glucocorticoids, while exhibiting a low occurrence of adverse events., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background: Crohn's disease (CD) is a debilitating gastrointestinal disease with complex etiology. Although effective, recipients of anti-tumor necrosis factor (TNF) agents may experience primary or secondary nonresponse, necessitating alternative treatments. This study is intended to compare the short-term effectiveness of ustekinumab and vedolizumab in treating CD after failure of multiple lines of anti-TNF therapy using real-world data., Methods: A retrospective study was conducted at a tertiary hospital in Dammam, Saudi Arabia, including adults (≥18 years old) with CD who did not respond to anti-TNF therapy. Primary endpoints were clinical improvement per the Harvey-Bradshaw Index (HBI) scores and remission at 12 weeks on an ordinal outcome scale. Secondary endpoints included clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic remission; clinical response; corticosteroid-free days; and cumulative steroid dose. Proportional odds and logistic regression Bayesian models were used to analyze outcomes, and the probability of treatment effectiveness was calculated from the posterior distribution., Results: The study included 101 patients (ustekinumab, n = 71 and vedolizumab, n = 30) with a median age of 32 years (IQR: 26.0-38.0); 54.4% were male. At 12 weeks, the HBI endpoint showed an adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 0.60 (95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.25-1.31), favoring ustekinumab, with a 75% probability of treatment effectiveness over vedolizumab. The clinical ordinal scale had an aOR = 0.61 (95% CI: 0.26-1.35) with a 73% probability of effectiveness for ustekinumab. Ustekinumab was also associated with favorable outcomes in secondary endpoints, reaching up to a 90% probability of effectiveness., Conclusion: In CD patients with anti-TNF failure, ustekinumab was more effective than vedolizumab in the short term. These real-world insights contribute to understanding CD management but require validation in larger prospective studies and randomized controlled trials., (Copyright © 2024 Copyright: © 2024 Saudi Journal of Gastroenterology.)

Objectives: To describe a Romanian cohort of patients with juvenile dermatomyositis (JDM) and to identify factors associated with disease severity, complete clinical response, and sustained remission., Methods: We retrospectively reviewed data from 30 JDM patients from 2013 to 2022. The inactive disease state was defined as no active skin rash, muscle weakness, or elevated muscle enzymes. A complete clinical response implied a status of inactive disease maintained for six consecutive months while on medication and remission of inactive disease for at least six consecutive months after treatment. Association factors and predictors of time to complete clinical response and time to remission emerged from bivariate correlation (Pearson's coefficient) and univariate survival analysis (Kaplan-Meier analysis)., Results: The median times to complete clinical response and time to remission for the entire cohort were 30.5 months (2.5 years) and 48.5 months (4.04 years), respectively. Nine patients (30%) had a severe disease course, while twenty-one patients (70%) had a mild/moderate course. The presence of calcinosis, time to corticosteroid discontinuation, history of treatment escalation in the first 18 months, and treatment with azathioprine or biologic DMARDs were strongly associated with a longer time to clinical remission (Pearson's > 0.5, p < 0.05). Seven patients (23%) achieved remission, and none of them relapsed during the subsequent median follow-up of 19 months., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

To characterize the microbiome and metabolic profile in Crohn's disease (CD) patients with different outcome after infliximab (IFX) treatment. The clinical data of a cohort of 35 patients with moderate-to-severe CD admitted at Jinling hospital between Oct 2022 and Dec 2023 were collected. Stool samples at baseline were collected to perform 16SrRNA and ITS2 sequencing and LC-MS untargeted metabolomics. Of these, seven discontinued IFX and underwent surgery during the induction period, and 28 received IFX at weeks 0, 2, and 6, each administered intravenously. Clinical remission was assessed based on the clinical symptoms and HBI at baseline and week 14. Baseline microbial richness and evenness was not significantly different between remission and non-remission group. The taxonomic community analysis identified decrease of Ruminococcus, Lachnoclostridium, Akkermansia in bacterial community and decrease of Asterotremella and Wallemia in fungal community in the non-remission group. LC-MS analysis showed that histamine, creatinine and L-proline significantly increased in remission group, while androsterone, berberine and episterol significantly decreased. The combined prediction model of histamine, androsterone, and episterol demonstrated a high predictive value of remission in patients after IFX treatment (AUC=0.898, p<0.001). Together, these data might facilitate a priori determination of optimal therapeutics for CD patients., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest The authors declare the following financial interests/personal relationships which may be considered as potential competing interests: Feng Zhu reports financial support was provided by China International Medical Foundation. If there are other authors, they declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper., (Copyright © 2024 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: This study aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of biologics and small molecules for treatment of adults with moderately-to-severely active ulcerative colitis (UC)., Methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to identify randomised controlled trials evaluating approved and emerging targeted therapies for patients with UC. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) approach was applied. Outcomes assessed included clinical response and remission, endoscopic mucosal healing, and safety., Results: Thirty studies were included in the NMA following a feasibility assessment comparing approved induction dosing regimens and 22 studies comparing approved maintenance dosing regimens. In the biologic/Janus kinase inhibitor (JAKi)-naïve population, induction studies showed similar clinical response and remission rates across most interventions, with upadacitinib demonstrating significant improvements versus most other interventions. For maintenance studies, mirikizumab demonstrated significant improvements in clinical response and remission versus most other interventions. In the biologic/JAKi-experienced population, no significant differences were observed between most interventions in induction studies, except for significantly improved clinical response and remission for mirikizumab versus adalimumab, and upadacitinib demonstrated significant improvement versus all other interventions. Few differences between active treatments were observed in maintenance studies. In both populations, all active interventions had similar efficacy in terms of endoscopic mucosal healing in both induction and maintenance studies. Regardless of prior treatment exposure, similar rates of serious adverse events were seen across all active interventions in the induction period., Conclusion: Among the available interventions, owing to its favourable efficacy and safety profile, mirikizumab has a relevant role in the long-term treatment of UC., (© 2024. The Author(s).)

Background and Aims: Histological outcomes and JAK-STAT signalling were assessed in a prospective ulcerative colitis [UC] patient cohort after 8 weeks treatment with tofacitinib, an oral Janus kinase [JAK] inhibitor., Methods: Forty UC patients received tofacitinib 10 mg twice daily for 8 weeks. Treatment response was defined as histo-endoscopic mucosal improvement [HEMI]. Histological remission was defined as a Robarts Histopathology Index [RHI] ≤3 points and histological response as 50% decrease in RHI. Mucosal expression of JAK1-3, tyrosine kinase 2 [TYK2], and total signal transducer and activator of transcription [STAT] 1-6 were assessed using immunohistochemistry [IHC]., Results: At baseline, the median RHI was 14 (interquartile range [IQR] 10-19). Of 40 [65%] patients, 26 had severe endoscopic disease [endoscopic Mayo score 3] and 31/40 [78%] failed prior anti-tumour necrosis factor [anti-TNF] treatment. At Week 8, 15 patients [38%] had HEMI, 23 patients [58%] histological remission, and 34 [85%] histological response. RHI decreased by a median of 14 points [IQR 9-21] in responders [p <0.001] and by 6 points [IQR 0-13] in non-responders [p = 0.002]. STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 expression levels decreased significantly in the whole cohort. Responders had lower Week 8 STAT1 expression levels compared with non-responders [0.2%, IQR 0.1-2.8 vs 4.3%, IQR 1.2-11.9, p = 0.001], suggesting more profound STAT1 blockade. A trend of higher baseline JAK2 expression was observed in tofacitinib non-responders [2.7%, IQR 0.1-7.7] compared with responders [0.4%, IQR 0.1-2.1]., Conclusions: Tofacitinib treatment resulted in histological improvement in the majority of UC patients and in a substantial decrease of STAT1, STAT3, and STAT5 expression. HEMI was associated with more profound suppression of STAT1., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Background and Aims: Pivotal trials in ulcerative colitis have historically excluded patients with isolated proctitis. Etrasimod is an oral, once-daily, selective sphingosine 1-phosphate1,4,5 receptor modulator for the treatment of moderately to severely active ulcerative colitis. This post hoc analysis assessed efficacy and safety of etrasimod 2 mg once daily in patients with isolated proctitis (centrally read) from the phase 3 ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12 trials., Methods: Patients, including those with isolated proctitis (<10 cm rectal involvement) who met all other inclusion criteria in ELEVATE UC 52 and ELEVATE UC 12, were randomised 2:1 to receive etrasimod or placebo. Primary, secondary and other identified efficacy endpoints and safety were assessed., Results: We analysed data from 64 and 723 patients at Week 12 (both trials pooled), and 36 and 397 patients at Week 52 (ELEVATE UC 52 only) with isolated proctitis and more extensive colitis (≥10 cm rectal involvement), respectively. Patients with isolated proctitis receiving etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo, including clinical remission rates at Weeks 12 (42.9% vs 13.6%) and 52 (44.4% vs 11.1%), endoscopic improvement (52.4% vs 22.7%) at Week 12 and bowel urgency numerical rating scale score at Week 12 (all p < 0.01). Generally similar trends were observed in patients with more extensive colitis. Safety was consistent across subgroups, with no new findings., Conclusions: Etrasimod demonstrated significant improvements versus placebo in patients with isolated proctitis, and those with more extensive disease, in most efficacy endpoints at Week 12 and 52. Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT03945188; NCT03996369., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation.)

Background and Aims: STRIDE-II recommends early biomarker targets for treatment optimization to achieve treat-to-target [T2T] endoscopic remission [ER] in Crohn's disease [CD]. The predictive capabilities of intestinal ultrasound [IUS] for T2T ER remain unknown. We aimed to evaluate IUS response to predict ER in children with CD., Methods: This was a prospective longitudinal cohort study of children with ileal [TI] CD initiating biologic therapy undergoing IUS, clinical disease activity, and C-reactive protein [CRP] assessments at baseline, week 8, 6 months, and T2T within 1 year. The primary outcome was the accuracy of optimal cut-points to predict TI ER [SES-CD ≤ 2] for change in bowel wall thickness [BWT] on IUS from baseline to week 8, and BWT at week 8. Area under the receiver operating curve [AUROC] analysis was performed and univariate analysis tested associations., Results: In total, 44 children (median age 13 [IQR 12-17] years, 29 [66%] biologic naïve) were included, and 29 [66%] achieved ER. A ≥18% decrease in TI BWT at week 8 predicted ER with an AUROC of 0.99 [95% CI 0.98-1.00], 100% sensitivity, 93% specificity, 97% positive predictive value, and 100% negative predictive value, superior to a ≥46% decrease in PCDAI (AUROC 0.67 [95% CI 0.49-0.84]) and ≥84% decrease in CRP (AUROC 0.49 [95% CI 0.31-0.67]) at week 8., Conclusions: Early change in TI BWT on IUS is highly predictive of ER in children with CD and superior to symptoms and CRP. Our findings suggest that IUS could be used for treatment optimization and tight control to guide T2T strategies., (© The Author(s) 2023. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of European Crohn’s and Colitis Organisation. All rights reserved. For commercial re-use, please contact reprints@oup.com for reprints and translation rights for reprints. All other permissions can be obtained through our RightsLink service via the Permissions link on the article page on our site—for further information please contact journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Objectives: To assess the efficacy, safety, immunogenicity, and pharmacokinetics through 240 weeks of ustekinumab treatment in paediatric patients from the long-term extension (LTE) of the phase 1, double-blind UniStar trial., Methods: Paediatric patients with moderately to severely active Crohn's disease (CD) were randomised 1:1 and stratified by body weight (<40 or ≥40 kg) to low- or high-dose intravenous ustekinumab followed by a subcutaneous maintenance dose at Week 8. At Week 16, patients were eligible to enter the LTE at the discretion of the investigator and continued maintenance dosing every 8 weeks up to Week 240., Results: Of the 34 patients who entered the LTE, 25 patients with evaluable data completed Week 48, and 41.2% (14/34) achieved clinical remission at Week 48. Among the 24 patients with Week-0 C-reactive protein (CRP) levels ≥3 mg/L, 29.2% (7/24) achieved normalisation of CRP at Week 48, while imputing missing data as failures. Through Week 240, the most common adverse events were infections (n = 28) and gastrointestinal disorders (n = 26). The most common serious adverse event was worsening of CD (n = 6). Only one patient had detectable antibodies to ustekinumab. Median serum ustekinumab concentrations remained consistent through Week 48, were detectable through Week 224, and trended lower in patients <40 kg., Conclusions: Efficacy and pharmacokinetics through 1 year and safety and immunogenicity through 4 years of ustekinumab treatment in paediatric patients with CD were generally comparable to those previously reported in adults., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Background: Asthma remission is a potential treatment goal., Research Question: Does adding azithromycin to standard therapy in patients with persistent uncontrolled asthma induce remission compared with placebo?, Study Design and Methods: This secondary analysis used data from the Asthma and Macrolides: the Azithromycin Efficacy and Safety (AMAZES) clinical trial-a double-anonymized placebo-controlled trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of azithromycin on asthma exacerbations. The primary remission definition (referred to as clinical remission) was zero exacerbations and zero oral corticosteroids during the previous 6 months evaluated at 12 months and a 5-item Asthma Control Questionnaire score ≤ 1 at 12 months. Secondary remission definitions included clinical remission plus lung function criteria (postbronchodilator FEV 1  ≥ 80% or postbronchodilator FEV 1  ≤ 5% decline from baseline) and complete remission (sputum eosinophil count < 3% plus the aforementioned criteria). Sensitivity analyses explored the robustness of primary and secondary remission definitions. The predictors of clinical remission were identified., Results: A total of 335 participants (41.5% male; median age, 61.01 years; quartile 1-3, 51.03-68.73) who completed the 12-month treatment period were included in the analysis. Twelve months of treatment with azithromycin induced asthma remission in a subgroup of patients, and a significantly higher proportion in the azithromycin arm achieved both clinical remission (50.6% vs 38.9%; P = .032) and clinical remission plus lung function criteria (50.8% vs 37.1%; P = .029) compared with placebo, respectively. In addition, a higher proportion of the azithromycin group achieved complete remission (23% vs 13.7%; P = .058). Sensitivity analyses supported these findings. Baseline factors (eg, better asthma-related quality of life, absence of oral corticosteroid burst in the previous year) predicted the odds of achieving clinical remission. Azithromycin induced remission in both eosinophilic and noneosinophilic asthma., Interpretation: In this study, adults with persistent symptomatic asthma achieved a higher remission rate when treated with azithromycin. Remission on treatment may be an achievable treatment target in moderate/severe asthma, and future studies should consider remission as an outcome measure., Competing Interests: Financial/Nonfinancial Disclosures The authors have reported to CHEST the following: D. T. reports grants from GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. V. M. M. reports grants and personal fees from GlaxoSmithKline, AstraZeneca and Boehringer Ingelheim, outside the submitted work. C. J. reports personal fees for advisory board work, conducting meetings and developing educational content, and nonfinancial support from AstraZeneca, personal fees for advisory board work from Boehringer Ingleheim, grants and personal fees for advisory board work from GlaxoSmithKline, and personal fees for advisory board work, facilitating symposia and developing educational content from Novartis, outside the submitted work. M. P. reports personal fees for advisory board work from Sanofi Genzyme, Novartis Pharmaceuticals and AstraZeneca, outside the submitted work. J. W. U. has received speaker fees, conference travel support and consultancy fees from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, Novartis, and Sanofi, outside the submitted work. P. G. G. reports personal fees for lectures from AstraZeneca, GlaxoSmithKline, and Novartis, and grants from AstraZeneca and GlaxoSmithKline, outside the submitted work. None declared (S. S., M. B., S. H., A. J., G. B. M., P. N. R , I. A. Y.)., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rituximab is a monoclonal antibody that targets CD20 antigen in B cells. For pemphigus, rituximab has been highly effective in steroid-sparing therapy for moderate to severe cases. Originator rituximab has demonstrated favorable treatment effects in patients with pemphigus, but its high cost remains a challenge. Biosimilar rituximab is expected to offer a potential solution. However, it is required for the comparative study of efficacy and safety between biosimilar and originator because all biosimilars may not be identical to the originator. In this study, we compared the treatment effects and safety of biosimilar (Truxima) and originator (MabThera) rituximab in patients with pemphigus. A final cohort of 52 patients in the MabThera group and 72 patients in the Truxima group was enrolled. Except for the intravenous immunoglobulin administration rate, there were no differences in baseline characteristics between the two groups, and for the purpose of comparing efficacy, investigations into time to complete remission, total steroid intake to complete remission, and total steroid intake for 6 months following rituximab treatment revealed no significant differences between the two groups. Truxima can be considered a relatively affordable alternative treatment option for pemphigus, offering cost-effectiveness to patients who are indicated for the treatment with MabThera., (© 2024 The Author(s). The Journal of Dermatology published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Dermatological Association.)

Antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody-associated vasculitis (AAV) is a systemic autoimmune disease characterized by necrotizing inflammation of small blood vessels. Glucocorticoids (GC) in combination with rituximab or cyclophosphamide can reduce AAV-related mortality and rescue renal function. However, several side effects associated with these agents, including GC toxicity, are concerning. Avacopan, an inhibitor of the C5a receptor, is now available for AAV treatment and is expected to mitigate GC toxicity. We present a case of myeloperoxidase-antineutrophil cytoplasmic antibody (MPO-ANCA)-positive microscopic polyangiitis (MPA) with rapidly progressive glomerulonephritis treated with an early switch from GC to avacopan in combination with rituximab during induction therapy. Over a 6-month treatment period, clinical remission was achieved and maintained without infection or elevated liver enzyme levels. Efficacy and safety data regarding avacopan for AAV induction therapy remain limited. Therefore, more case reports are required to clarify the role of avacopan in AAV induction and maintenance therapy. Since the MPO-ANCA titer remained elevated despite the clinical remission of AAV in this case, the ANCA titer may not necessarily be a reliable biomarker for predicting AAV relapse when avacopan is applied as an induction therapy for AAV., (© 2023. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Japanese Society of Nephrology.)

Trial Design: Pemphigus is a rare but life-threatening autoimmune disease requiring long-term treatment that minimizes corticosteroid (CS) exposure while providing consistent disease control. The phase 2 pemphigus study of oral, reversible, covalent Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitor rilzabrutinib demonstrated rapid and sustained efficacy with well-tolerated safety., Methods: Adults (aged 18-80 years) were randomized 1:1 to 400 mg rilzabrutinib (n = 65) or placebo (n = 66) twice daily (with CS ≤ 0.5 mg/kg/d) for 37 weeks in the phase 3 PEGASUS study in moderate-to-severe pemphigus vulgaris/pemphigus foliaceus., Results: The primary endpoint of complete remission from week 29 to week 37 with the amended endpoint CS dose ≤10 mg/d was not significant for 13 of 54 (24%) rilzabrutinib versus 10 of 55 (18%) placebo patients with PV (P = .45). Secondary endpoints showed numerical but nonsignificant improvements with rilzabrutinib (vs placebo) in reduced CS use, prolonged complete remission duration, and faster time to first complete remission., Conclusions: Overall, rilzabrutinib was well-tolerated, with similar adverse events reported in both groups. Using minimal CS dose ≤10 mg/d and excluding remote observations, the primary efficacy endpoint was not met. However, results from a prespecified sensitivity analysis using CS dose ≤5 mg/d, considering all observations, and including all patients support Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibition as a viable therapeutic approach for pemphigus., (Copyright © 2024 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: To evaluate the efficacy of immunosuppressive therapy (IST) and tonsillectomy (TE) in patients with high-risk IgA nephropathy (IgAN). Materials and мethods. The retrospective study cohort included cases with primary IgAN ( n =213, age 34±11 years, male 52%) at high risk of progression with clinical and morphological data collected. The follow-up was 26 (10; 61) months. The association of IST without TE (IST; n =141) or with TE (IST+TE; n =72) with the development of complete (PR), partial (PR) and overall (PR or PR, OR) remissions was investigated., Results: The incidence of achieving early PR or OR in the IST and IST+TE groups was 65.2% and 86.1%, respectively ( p =0.002). The probability of early PR or OR was significantly increased in the IST+TE group compared to IST [HR 1.714 (1.214-2.420) and HR 3.410 (1.309-8.880), respectively]. IST+TE was associated with a 3- to 4-fold increase in the likelihood of PR or OR at the end of follow-up [HR 2.575 (1.679-3.950) and HR 4.768 (2.434-9.337), respectively]. Analyses using pseudorandomisation methods yielded similar results., Conclusion: TE may be effective for remission induction in high-risk IgAN.

Objectives: We investigated the effect of belimumab (BEL) on achieving low disease activity (LDA) and remission as an additive molecular-targeting agent to standard of care (SoC) in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)., Methods: Clinical information was retrospectively collected from patients with SLE who received BEL additive to SoC (BEL + SoC), and from patients treated with SoC alone as a control arm. Disease activity was measured by SLE-disease activity score (SLE-DAS). The proportion of patients in LDA and remission at 12 months was compared after propensity score matching. The factors contributing to LDA and remission achievement were identified by Cox proportional hazard model., Results: BEL + SoC significantly reduced SLE-DAS at 6 months, with a significantly higher proportion of patients achieving LDA and remission at 12 months compared to SoC alone. The presence of arthritis at baseline was significantly associated with achieving LDA and remission. Additionally, both treatment groups experienced a significant reduction in daily glucocorticoid dose., Conclusions: Adding BEL to SoC was beneficial for patients with arthritis, leading to higher proportion of achieving LDA and remission, while also reducing their glucocorticoid dose. Our results indicate the utility of BEL in a treat-to-target approach for SLE patients in a real-world setting., (© Japan College of Rheumatology 2023. Published by Oxford University Press. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Ustekinumab has been shown to be effective in inducing and maintain clinical and endoscopic remission in Crohn disease (CD). We aim to assess whether ustekinumab trough levels are associated with improved outcomes in CD in real-life. We recruited patients with CD who were treated with ustekinumab for at least 6 months from January 2017 to June 2023. Patients received ustekinumab 6 mg/kg intravenous induction followed by 90 mg every 4-, 8-, or 12-weeks during maintenance were included. We assessed clinical, biochemical, and endoscopic outcomes. Trough concentrations of ustekinumab that were taken from week 42 to week 52 were measured. Primary outcome was to evaluate the relationship between ustekinumab trough concentrations and clinical remission, biochemical normalization, and endoscopic remission. Logistic regression was conducted to assess outcomes. A total of 137 patients with CD, median age of 32 years and 83 (60.6%) males. The median serum levels of ustekinumab measured was 7.2 mcg/mL (interquartile range [IQR] 3.1-9.6). Using Spearman correlation analysis, a strong negative correlation was observed between ustekinumab drug levels and simple endoscopic score (SES-CD) (r = -0.464, P < .001). Additionally, ustekinumab drug levels demonstrated substantial negative correlations with disease severity measured by Harvey-Bradshaw index (HBI) score (r = -0.582, P < .001), C-Reactive Protein (CRP) levels (r = -0.598, P < .001) and fecal calprotectin (FC) levels (r = -0.529, P < .001). A multivariable analysis adjusted for age, sex and body mass index (BMI) showed a significant association between ustekinumab serum drug levels and predefined outcomes. Ustekinumab serum drug level above 4.5 mcg/mL was associated with 24% increase in the likelihood of having an SES-CD score <3 (OR 1.24, confidence interval [CI] 1.12-1.37, P value < .001), 44% more likely to achieve HBI score <5 (OR 1.44, CI 1.26-1.65, P value < .001), 52% higher likelihood of CRP more than 10 (OR 1.52, CI 1.31-1.77, P < .001), and 42% increased likelihood of FC more than 250 (OR 1.42, CI 1.24-1.62, P < .001). Ustekinumab trough concentrations above 4.5 mcg/mL were associated with clinical, biochemical and endoscopic remission in CD. Prospective data is warranted to confirm these findings., Competing Interests: The authors have no funding and conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Vedolizumab (VDZ), a monoclonal antibody to α4β7 integrin, is available for patients with moderate-to-severe ulcerative colitis (UC). This study planned to assess the real-world effectiveness and safety of VDZ for UC patients in Northern China. We enrolled patients with moderate-to-severe UC who underwent VDZ induction therapy from March 2021 to November 2022 at the Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. The primary outcome was clinical remission at weeks 14 and 52 after the initial VDZ therapy. Overall adverse events and risk factors associated with loss of response (LOR) were also evaluated. Seventy-three UC patients receiving VDZ therapy were included in this study. The rates of clinical response, clinical remission, and steroid-free clinical remission were 69.9%, 39.7%, and 34.2% at week 14 and 90.5%, 66.7%, and 64.4% at week 52, respectively. The mucosal remission rates were 37.5% (18/48) at week 14 ± 8 and 27.3% (9/33) at week 52 ± 16, while only 2 and 3 patients achieved mucosal healing at weeks 14 ± 8 and 52 ± 16, respectively. Of the UC patients, 23.3% experienced adverse events associated with VDZ, most of which were mild and self-limiting. Until the last follow-up, 37 of 73 UC patients experienced LOR during the maintenance period. Patients with a higher ulcerative colitis endoscopic severity index (UCEIS), partial Mayo scores (PMS), or hemoglobin below 120 g/L at baseline were more likely to experience LOR after VDZ induction therapy. VDZ is an effective and safe agent for patients with moderate-to-severe UC in Northern China. A high baseline UCEIS, PMS, or hemoglobin < 120 g/L may be an independent risk factor for LOR during the maintenance period., Competing Interests: The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2024 the Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Objectives: Oral viscous budesonide (OVB) is a common medication used to treat eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE). It is typically mixed with Splenda to produce a slurry, but other delivery vehicles have been used in clinical practice. We aimed to evaluate outcomes of pediatric EoE patients treated with OVB using different drug delivery vehicles., Methods: We performed a retrospective chart review of pediatric EoE patients treated with OVB. The primary aim was to evaluate rates of histologic remission (defined by <15 eosinophils per high power field in both mid and distal esophagus) after 6-12 weeks of OVB treatment for each delivery vehicle. Secondary aims were to evaluate histologic response and endoscopic response and remission of different delivery vehicles, and to compare the efficacy of different treatment regimens., Results: A total of 111 patients were included in the study. Median treatment duration was 3.4 months. Overall rate of histologic remission with OVB was 52.6%. There was no difference in rates of histologic remission (p = 0.313) or response (p = 0.195 and p = 0.681 in mid and distal esophagus, respectively) among the different vehicle types or treatment regimens. Similarly, there was no difference in endoscopic remission and response among the different vehicle types (p = 0.853 and p = 0.727) or treatment regimens (p = 0.244 and p = 0.157). Patients who achieve histologic remission were more likely to be non-Hispanic Caucasian., Conclusion: Our findings suggest there is no difference in histologic and endoscopic outcomes with various delivery vehicles or combination therapy with OVB in the treatment of EoE. More palatable and cost-effective vehicles can be used to treat EoE., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)

Purpose of Review: To provide an overview of the current literature regarding the use of advanced combination therapy (ACT) in patients with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). Although the treatment of IBD has come a long way, many patients do not respond or will lose response to currently available treatments over time. ACT has been proposed as a model to create sustained remission in difficult-to-treat IBD patient populations. This review discusses the available literature supporting the use of ACT, followed by practical tips for applying this model of treatment to clinical practice., Recent Findings: Both observational and controlled evidence have demonstrated that there may be an increased benefit of ACT in specific IBD patient populations compared to advanced targeted immunomodulator (TIM) monotherapy. Additional data is required to understand how to best use combination TIMs and the long-term risks associated with this strategy., Summary: While the literature has demonstrated the potential for benefit in both Crohn's disease and ulcerative colitis, the use of ACT is currently off-label and long-term controlled data is needed. The successful application of ACT requires careful consideration of both patient and disease profiles as well as close monitoring of treatment response and adverse events., (Copyright © 2024 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The severe course of inflammatory bowel diseases (IBDs) refractory to advanced therapies in children results in the search for new therapeutic methods. The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of dual therapy with biologics in a cohort of children with IBD., Methods: Retrospective analysis of data from 29 children with a diagnosis of IBD, 19 with ulcerative colitis (66%), 10 with Crohn's disease (CD) (34%) qualified for dual biological therapy (DBT). The median age of patients was five (interquartile range [IQR], 1-15) years at diagnosis of IBD and 14 (IQR, 3-17) years at eligibility for dual therapy. Thirteen (45%) patients were treated with vedolizumab/adalimumab (VDZ + ADA), 13 (45%) with ustekinumab/adalimumab (UST + ADA), three (10%) with infliximab/vedolizumab (IFX + VDZ)., Results: Clinical remission was achieved in 13 (45%; seven UC and six CD) and 12 (41%; seven UC and five CD) Pediatric Weighted Crohn's Disease Activity Index (wPCDAI)/Pediatric Ulcerative Colitis Activity Index (PUCAI) patients after 4 and 12 months at the initiation of dual therapy. Clinical response based on wPCDAI/PUCAI was reported in 16 (55%; nine UC and seven CD) and 12 (41% seven UC and five CD) children after 4 and 12 months of follow-up, respectively. The median fecal calprotectin decreased significantly from 1240 µg/g (53-10,100) to 160 µg/g (5-2500; p = 0.004) between baseline and Month 4 and from 749 at baseline (57-10,100) to 17 (5-3110; p = 0.12) over 12 months. Moreover, 34% (six UC and four CD) of patients achieved endoscopic remission., Conclusions: DBT seems to be an effective alternative therapeutic option for patients with moderate and severe IBD., (© 2024 European Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition and North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology, and Nutrition.)