Search

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the most common cancers in Latin America and the Caribbean, with the highest rates reported for Uruguay, Brazil and Argentina. We provide a global snapshot of the CRC patterns, how screening is performed, and compared/contrasted to the genetic profile of Lynch syndrome (LS) in the region. From the literature, we find that only nine (20%) of the Latin America and the Caribbean countries have developed guidelines for early detection of CRC, and also with a low adherence. We describe a genetic profile of LS, including a total of 2,685 suspected families, where confirmed LS ranged from 8% in Uruguay and Argentina to 60% in Peru. Among confirmed LS, path_MLH1 variants were most commonly identified in Peru (82%), Mexico (80%), Chile (60%), and path_MSH2/EPCAM variants were most frequently identified in Colombia (80%) and Argentina (47%). Path_MSH6 and path_PMS2 variants were less common, but they showed important presence in Brazil (15%) and Chile (10%), respectively. Important differences exist at identifying LS families in Latin American countries, where the spectrum of path_MLH1 and path_MSH2 variants are those most frequently identified. Our findings have an impact on the evaluation of the patients and their relatives at risk for LS, derived from the gene affected. Although the awareness of hereditary cancer and genetic testing has improved in the last decade, it is remains deficient, with 39%–80% of the families not being identified for LS among those who actually met both the clinical criteria for LS and showed MMR deficiency. Radium Hospital Foundation (Oslo, Norway)

e17115 Background: It remains unclear which is the best chemotherapy (CT) regimen and what is the role of adding radiotherapy (RT) to adjuvant CT in high-risk endometrial cancer. Methods: We performed a retrospective analysis of the patients (pts) with high-risk endometrial cancer (endometrioid histology stages III-IVA or carcinossarcoma/ clear cells/ serous histology stages I-IVA) treated with adjuvant carboplatin (AUC 5) and paclitaxel (175 mg/m2), every 3 weeks, for 6 cycles, followed by RT (conformal external beam radiotherapy to pelvic or pelvic and paraortic fields with 45Gy-54Gy plus weekly vaginal brachytherapy with 20Gy in 4 fractions). Pts were treated from 2010 to 2016 at a Brazilian public cancer center. Medical records were reviewed for demographic, clinicopathologic and outcome information. Data was analyzed for overall survival (OS), disease-free survival (DFS), prognostic factors and toxicity. The Kaplan-Meier method was used for survival analysis and Cox proportional hazard model for prognostic factors. Results: 146 consecutive pts were evaluated. Median age was 62 years (range 35-81). Most patients had ECOG 0-1 (98%), endometrioid (53%) or serous histology (26%), grade 3 tumor (57%) and FIGO stage III (77%). Median follow-up was 26.5 months. The OS rates were 85% (95% CI 75 – 91%) in 3 years and 73% (95% CI 58 – 84%) in 5 years. Factors that significantly affected OS in a multivariate analysis were FIGO stage (p = .009), pelvic lymphadenectomy (yes vs no, p = .023) and positive peritoneal cytology (yes vs no, p = .002). 3-year and 5-year DFS rates were 79% (95% CI 70 – 86%) and 68% (95% CI 52 – 80%), respectively. The initial site of recurrence was limited to the pelvis in 3% of the pts, within the abdomen in 1% and extra-abdominal in 11%. Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 47% of the pts and were mainly hematologic toxicity (43%). There were only 3 cases of febrile neutropenia and 4 cases of hospitalization due to toxicity. Conclusions: Our data suggests that adjuvant carboplatin and paclitaxel, followed by RT, in high-risk endometrial cancer is safe and effective. Low rates of pelvic recurrence were observed, which might be explained by the addition of RT to adjuvant CT.

and Purpose: Post-operative radiation therapy (PORT) is usually indicated for patients with breast cancer (BC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and surgery. However, the optimal timing to initiation of PORT is currently unknown.We retrospectively evaluated data from patients with BC who received PORT after NAC and surgery at our institution from 2008 to 2014. Patients were categorized into three groups according to the time between surgery and PORT:8 weeks, 8-16 weeks and16 weeks.A total of 581 patients were included; 74% had clinical stage III. Forty-three patients started PORT within 8 weeks, 354 between 8 and 16 weeks and 184 beyond 16 weeks from surgery. With a median follow-up of 32 months, initiation of PORT up to 8 weeks after surgery was associated with better disease-free survival (DFS) (8 weeks versus 8-16 weeks: HR 0.33; 95% CI 0.13-0.81; p = 0.02;8 weeks versus16 weeks: HR 0.38; 95% CI 0.15-0.96; p = 0.04) and better overall survival (OS) (8 weeks versus 8-16 weeks: HR 0.22; 95% CI 0.05-0.90; p = 0.036;8 weeks versus16 weeks: HR 0.28; 95% CI 0.07-1.15; p = 0.08).PORT started up to 8 weeks after surgery was associated with better DFS and OS in locally-advanced BC patients submitted to NAC. Our findings suggest that early initiation of PORT is critically important for these patients. However, the low numbers of patients and events in this study prevent us from drawing firm conclusions.