Search

Background: Increased prevalence of adolescent obesity requires effective treatment options beyond behavior therapy.Objective: To see whether sibutramine reduced weight more than placebo in obese adolescents who were receiving a behavior therapy program.Design: 12-month, 3:1 randomized, double-blind trial conducted from July 2000 to February 2002.Setting: 33 U.S. outpatient clinics.Participants: 498 participants 12 to 16 years of age with a body mass index (BMI) that was at least 2 units more than the U.S. weighted mean of the 95th percentile based on age and sex, to the upper limit of 44 kg/m2.Interventions: Site-specific behavior therapy plus 10 mg of sibutramine or placebo. Blinded study medication dose was uptitrated to 15 mg or placebo at month 6 if initial BMI was not reduced by 10%.Measurements: Body mass index, waist circumference, body weight, fasting lipid and glycemic variables, safety, and tolerability.Results: Seventy-six percent of patients in the sibutramine group and 62% of patients in the placebo group completed the study. The estimated mean treatment group difference at month 12 (linear mixed-effects model) favored sibutramine for change from baseline in BMI (-2.9 kg/m2 [95% CI, -3.5 to -2.2 kg/m2]) and body weight (-8.4 kg [CI, -9.7 to -7.2 kg]) (P < 0.001 for both). The sibutramine group had greater improvements in triglyceride levels, high-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, insulin levels, and insulin sensitivity (P < or = 0.001 for all). The rate of tachycardia was greater with sibutramine vs. placebo (12.5% vs. 6.2%; difference, 6.3 percentage points [CI, 1.0 to 11.7 percentage points]) but did not lead to increased withdrawal (2.4% vs. 1.5%; difference, 0.9 percentage point [CI, -1.7 to 3.5 percentage points]).Limitations: The 1-year study duration precluded assessment of long-term weight maintenance and putative health benefits and harms, and 24% and 38% of the sibutramine and placebo groups, respectively, did not complete follow-up.Conclusions: Sibutramine added to a behavior therapy program reduced BMI and body weight more than placebo and improved the profile of several metabolic risk factors in obese adolescents. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibody-drug conjugates (ADCs) are new treatment options for certain cancers, especially those in advanced states with limited treatment options. Their unique design provides targeted therapy with toxins that otherwise would not be available, but they manifest toxicities that require risk minimization interventions to optimize their tolerability. We summarize selected toxicities for ADCs that have been approved through the end of 2020 and three investigational ADCs, which include both payload and linker, as described in the US Prescribing Information, the European Summary of Product Characteristics, and study protocols. These toxicities include peripheral neuropathy; pulmonary, skin, hepatic, and ocular toxicities; hyperglycemia; left ventricular dysfunction; and fluid-related events. We also review the risk minimization approaches to managing these toxicities as described in the product labels and study protocols. Our general observation suggests that the selected toxicities of the approved ADCs are primarily associated with off-target effects of the drug payloads. We also observed that the risk minimization approaches used to manage the selected toxicities are similar across product labels and study protocols. ADCs provide a unique treatment approach that is currently focused on advanced or refractory cancers. The risk minimization approaches for the selected toxicities for the approved ADCs per product label, or the study protocol for those in clinical investigation, are similar to those of standard chemotherapy agents and other pharmaceutical agents for the treatment of advanced malignancies. These risk minimization measures align with standard medical practice and are likely familiar to and feasible for physicians who prescribe for, and to other healthcare practitioners who care for, patients treated with ADCs.

Objectives: To quantify patient preferences for endometriosis-associated pain treatments and risk tolerance in exchange for pain reduction and to explore whether preferences vary on the basis of patient characteristics., Methods: US women with a self-reported physician diagnosis of endometriosis and moderate to severe dysmenorrhea and nonmenstrual pelvic pain (NMPP) completed an online discrete choice experiment survey. Each choice question had a pair of hypothetical treatments characterized by attributes with varying levels: improvements in severe dysmenorrhea, severe NMPP, and severe dyspareunia; mode of administration; and treatment-related risks of pregnancy-related problems, bone fracture later in life, and moderate to severe hot flashes. A random-parameters logit model was used to quantify preferences and the attributes' conditional relative importance., Results: A total of 250 women (mean age 34 years) completed the survey. The conditional relative importance of attributes was 3.66 for risk of moderate to severe hot flashes among respondents with and 3.58 among respondents without experience with moderate to severe hot flashes; 1.70, 1.49, and 1.48 for improvements in dyspareunia, NMPP, and dysmenorrhea, respectively; 0.60 for risk of pregnancy-related problems; 0.53 for mode of administration; and 0.49 for bone fracture risk. Preference weights for bone fracture risk levels were not statistically significantly different. In exchange for a greater improvement in dysmenorrhea from severe to mild (vs moderate), respondents without a history of hot flashes accepted a greater increase in the risk of moderate to severe hot flashes (38%) than did respondents with this history (16%)., Conclusions: Respondents placed the greatest weight on risk of hot flashes, followed by improvements in dyspareunia, NMPP, dysmenorrhea. Bone fracture risk did not drive preferences., (Copyright © 2019 ISPOR–The Professional Society for Health Economics and Outcomes Research. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Aim: The Sibutramine Cardiovascular OUTcomes trial showed that sibutramine produced greater mean weight loss than placebo but increased cardiovascular morbidity but not mortality. The relationship between 12-month weight loss and subsequent cardiovascular outcomes is explored., Methods: Overweight/obese subjects (N = 10 744), ≥55 years with cardiovascular disease and/or type 2 diabetes mellitus, received sibutramine plus weight management during a 6-week Lead-in Period before randomization to continue sibutramine (N = 4906) or to receive placebo (N = 4898). The primary endpoint was the time from randomization to first occurrence of a primary outcome event (non-fatal myocardial infarction, non-fatal stroke, resuscitated cardiac arrest or cardiovascular death)., Results: For the total population, mean weight change during Lead-in Period (sibutramine) was -2.54 kg. Post-randomization, mean total weight change to Month 12 was -4.18 kg (sibutramine) or -1.87 kg (placebo). Degree of weight loss during Lead-in Period or through Month 12 was associated with a progressive reduction in risk for the total population in primary outcome events and cardiovascular mortality over the 5-year assessment. Although more events occurred in the randomized sibutramine group, on an average, a modest weight loss of approximately 3 kg achieved in the Lead-in Period appeared to offset this increased event rate. Moderate weight loss (3-10 kg) reduced cardiovascular deaths in those with severe, moderate or mild cardiovascular disease., Conclusions: Modest weight loss over short-term (6 weeks) and longer-term (6-12 months) periods is associated with reduction in subsequent cardiovascular mortality for the following 4-5 years even in those with pre-existing cardiovascular disease. While the sibutramine group experienced more primary outcome events than the placebo group, greater weight loss reduced overall risk of these occurring in both groups., (© 2011 Blackwell Publishing Ltd.)

Background: Adalimumab is a therapeutic monoclonal antibody for SC administration by 2 single-use injection devices providing bioequivalent amounts of adalimumab: a ready-to-use, prefilled syringe and an integrated, disposable delivery system, the autoinjection Pen. Although pens have been shown to be preferred over syringes by patients requiring long-term SC administration of medications, there are no data on preference and pain in the use of biologics in patients with chronic inflammatory diseases., Objective: The aim of this study was to assess injection-site pain, tolerability, and patient preference of 2 delivery systems of adalimumab., Methods: Patients with rheumatoid arthritis were enrolled in a Phase II, multicenter, open-label, single-arm, sequential trial. Patients self-administered a standard dose of adalimumab 40 mg SC every other week at each of 3 monitored clinical visits: visit 1 (syringe), visits 2 and 3 (Pen). At each visit, patients rated their pain on an 11-point scale (0 = none to 10 = pain as bad as it could be) immediately after injection and 15-30 minutes after injection and provided their impressions of and preferences for each delivery system. Safety events were recorded throughout the study and 70 days after final study dose., Results: Fifty-two patients were enrolled in the trial and completed all 3 visits (32 women, 20 men; mean [SD] age, 53.8 [12.1] years). Forty (76.9%) patients reported that the Pen was less painful than the syringe, 4 (7.7%) patients found the syringe to be less painful, and 8 (15.4%) patients had no preference. Patients had statistically significant reductions in injection-pain scores from visit 1 to visit 2 and from visit 1 to visit 3. No new safety signals or apparent differences regarding tolerability between the syringe and Pen were observed. In addition, 46 (88.5%) patients preferred the Pen, 3 (5.8%) preferred the syringe, and 3 (5.8%) had no preference. Overall, patients evaluated the Pen as easier to use (94.2%), more convenient (92.3%), requiring less time to inject (82.7%), and safer (88.5%)., Conclusions: Patients experienced less pain self-administering adalimumab via the Pen and preferred it versus the syringe. Further, patients perceived the Pen to be easier to use and more convenient. Both delivery systems were generally well tolerated.

Background: Early weight loss is generally considered to predict long-term weight outcome in obese patients, and this is reflected in prescribing guidelines for antiobesity drugs. For example, the current prescribing guidelines for the antiobesity drug, sibutramine, indicate that if patients have not lost 2 kg (or 4 lb) in the first 4 weeks of treatment with sibutramine 10 mg, the physician should re-evaluate the therapy, which may result in increasing the dose to 15 mg or discontinuation. This regimen may deny treatment to a large group of patients who might otherwise benefit, particularly patients with type 2 diabetes who often find it more difficult to lose weight than non-diabetic obese individuals., Materials: We have re-analysed pooled data from seven randomized, controlled studies of sibutramine-induced weight loss and maintenance in which patients (n = 928; 75% female) had taken sibutramine 10 or 15 mg continuously for 12 months, in order to determine the predictors of success in weight loss (defined as loss of at least 5% of initial body weight at Month 12) in both diabetic and non-diabetic patients. Sensitivity and specificity analyses were used to calculate optimal predictive values., Results: In both diabetic and non-diabetic patients, weight loss of 4 kg at 3 months was identified as the optimal predictor for achieving at least 5% weight loss at 12 months. This target was associated with the best average values for sensitivity, specificity and accuracy, as well as high positive (78% vs. 84% for non-diabetics and 76% vs. 85% for diabetics, compared to existing guidelines target of 2 kg after 1 month treatment) and negative predictive values (63% vs. 71% for non-diabetics; 52% vs. 70% for diabetics)., Conclusion: Sibutramine, in conjunction with diet and exercise, should be continued for at least 3 months (providing there are no adverse effects) to determine whether or not patients are likely to achieve a clinically valid outcome at 1 year. This highlights the need to ensure that regulatory restrictions reflect the needs of clinical practice.

Background: Lopinavir/ritonavir has demonstrated antiviral activity in the HIV-infected adult., Subjects: The objective of this study was to investigate a liquid coformulation of lopinavir/ritonavir, in combination with reverse transcriptase inhibitors, in HIV-infected children., Methods: One hundred antiretroviral (ARV)-naive and ARV-experienced, nonnucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitor-naive children between 6 months and 12 years of age participated in this Phase I/II, open label, multicenter trial. Subjects initially received either 230/57.5 mg/m(2) or 300/75 mg/m(2) lopinavir/ritonavir twice daily; ARV-naive subjects also received stavudine and lamivudine, whereas ARV-experienced subjects also received nevirapine and one or two nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors. Lopinavir/ritonavir pharmacokinetics, safety and efficacy were evaluated., Results: All subjects were escalated to the 300/75 mg/m(2) twice daily dose based on results from an interim pharmacokinetic and safety evaluation. The pharmacokinetics of lopinavir did not appear to be dependent on age when dosing was based on body surface area but were decreased on coadministration with nevirapine. Overall 79% of subjects had HIV RNA levels <400 copies/ml at Week 48 (intent-to-treat: missing = failure). Mean increases in absolute and relative (percent) CD4 counts from baseline to Week 48 were observed in both ARV-naive subjects (404 cells/mm(3); 10.3%) and ARV-experienced subjects (284 cells/mm(3); 5.9%). Only one subject prematurely discontinued the study because of a study drug-related adverse event., Conclusions: The liquid coformulation of lopinavir/ritonavir demonstrated durable antiviral activity and was safe and well-tolerated after 48 weeks of treatment in HIV-infected children.

Objective: To determine whether pretreatment with intravenous antihistamines attenuates the symptoms of red-man syndrome associated with rapid vancomycin administration., Design: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study of patients undergoing elective arthroplasty., Setting: Preoperative unit in a tertiary care center., Patients: Forty preoperative patients (American Society of Anesthesiologists status I-III, receiving vancomycin prophylaxis for elective prosthetic joint replacement or revision., Interventions: Elective orthopedic patients were randomly allocated to receive intravenous antihistamines (diphenhydramine, 1 mg/kg, and cimetidine, 4 mg/kg) or placebo before rapid vancomycin infusion (1 g over 10 mins). Hemodynamic measurements, symptoms of histamine release, and plasma histamine levels were obtained in each patient during vancomycin administration. Rapid vancomycin infusion was discontinued in cases of decreases in mean blood pressure of > or =20% or intolerable itching., Measurements and Main Results: Clinical symptomatology of red-man syndrome and histamine levels were assessed using Fisher's exact test or Student's t-test. Comparison of baseline and peak histamine levels for both the treated (mean +/- SD, 0.2 +/- 0.2 vs. 4.7 +/- 2.4 ng/mL; p < .0001) and placebo patients (mean +/-SD, 0.2 +/- 0.1 vs. 3.5 +/- 3.4 ng/mL; p = .0002) was statistically significant. Although there was a significant increase in plasma histamine levels during vancomycin infusion, it did not differ between the treatment groups. Only two (11%) of the treated patients developed hypotension, vs. 12 (63%) of the placebo patients (p = .002). Rash was partially attenuated. Twelve (63%) of the treated patients developed rash, compared with 19 (100%) of the placebo patients (p = .008). The rapid infusion was discontinued in two (11%) of the treated patients, compared with 11 (58%) of the placebo patients (p = .005). Four treated patients had no symptoms of histamine release., Conclusions: Pretreatment with intravenous H1 and H2 antihistamines permitted rapid vancomycin administration in 89% of treated patients. Although protection was incomplete, rash did not predict a need to stop the rapid infusion of vancomycin in our patients.

Background: Anaphylaxis, mediated by immunoglobulin E, may be clinically indistinguishable but is mechanistically different than chemically mediated anaphylactoid reactions induced by drugs such as morphine, curare, and vancomycin. A test to distinguish anaphylactic from anaphylactoid reactions would clarify therapeutic and medicolegal issues. Tryptase levels identify anaphylactic reactions but have not been evaluated in vivo during anaphylactoid reactions. A prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial of antihistamine chemoprophylaxis for rapid vancomycin infusion was performed, and plasma tryptase was measured using a new immunoassay. Histamine release was established by measurement of plasma histamine and the ability of prophylactic H1 and H2 antagonists to prevent common histamine-associated side effects. Tryptase levels were compared with histamine levels and clinical symptoms., Methods: Before elective arthroplasty, 40 patients received vancomycin infusion (1 g over 10 min) and pretreatment with either antihistamines (1 mg/kg diphenhydramine and 4 mg/kg cimetidine) or placebo. Changes in tryptase (at peak histamine and 10 min after vancomycin infusion), histamine levels, and histamine-mediated symptoms were assessed using Fisher's exact test, the Student's t test, or the paired t test, as appropriate. Logistic regression models were used to quantify the association of clinical symptoms with antihistamine treatment and serum levels., Results: Plasma tryptase levels were unchanged (99% CI, -0.5 to 1.6) independent of increased histamine levels, antihistamine pretreatment, clinical symptoms, or all of these. Histamine levels >1 ng/ml were significantly associated with hypotension, moderate-to-severe rash, and stopped infusion. Antihistamine pretreatment significantly decreased the incidence and severity of the reactions., Conclusion: Plasma tryptase levels were not significantly elevated in confirmed anaphylactoid reactions, so they can be used to distinguish chemical from immunologic reactions.

Unlabelled: Rapid infusion of vancomycin causes histamine-mediated side effects, hypotension, and rash, known as "red man syndrome." In this prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study, we examined the ability of oral antihistamines to attenuate three clinical end points: rash, hypotension, and vancomycin discontinuation, and we compared these findings with those of a similar study using IV antihistamines. Patients (ASA physical status I-III) who required vancomycin prophylaxis for elective arthroplasty received either oral antihistamines (diphenhydramine < or = 1 mg/kg and cimetidine < or = 4 mg/kg, n = 20) or placebo (n = 10) 1 h before rapid vancomycin infusion (1 g over 10 min). The vancomycin infusion was discontinued if the mean arterial blood pressure decreased by > or = 20% or if itching was intolerable for the patient. Clinically significant hypotension developed in no treated patients, compared with five (50%) patients in the placebo group (P = 0.001). Rapid infusion was stopped for one treated patient (5%) and for five (50%) patients in the placebo group (P = 0.004). Incidence (P = 0.011) and severity of rash (P = 0.015) were also reduced in treated patients. Peak histamine levels were increased but were similar for patients in both groups (mean +/- SD, 1.9+/-2.5 vs 1.6+/-2.4 ng/mL; P = 0.75). Oral antihistamines were as effective as IV antihistamines. In conclusion, oral H1 and H2 antihistamine pretreatment is a practical, safe, and inexpensive option to attenuate histamine-mediated side effects associated with rapid vancomycin infusion., Implications: Clinicians often must administer vancomycin faster than the 1-h recommended time, which can cause "red man syndrome" (rash, itching, hypotension). Our randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study showed that oral H1 and H2 antihistamine pretreatment significantly reduced the histamine-related side effects of rapid vancomycin infusion.

Nephrocalcin (NC), a urinary calcium oxalate monohydrate (COM) crystal growth inhibitor, was purified from kidneys of nine vertebrate species including humans. All isolates were glycoproteins with high contents of aspartic and glutamic acids and small amounts of basic and aromatic amino acids. Carbohydrate contents ranged from 4 to 16 wt% among the different species, but all contained fucose, mannose, galactose, glucose, galactosamine, glucosamine, and N-acetylneuraminic acid. Although amino acid and carbohydrate compositions were similar, dissociation constants derived from calcium oxalate monohydrate inhibition varied between 10(-7) and 10(-8) M, and highest affinity could be related to highest ability of the kidney of origin to concentrate urine. Using an antibody raised against NC from human kidney tissue culture medium, we found strong immunoreactivity with two species, pigs and sheep. Thus far all vertebrate kidneys possess COM growth-inhibiting material that seems to be of glycoprotein character, and all the glycoproteins isolated so far share similar features, suggesting NC-like proteins are a well-conserved trait.

The 2-position substituent on substrates or substrate analogues for glutamate dehydrogenase is shown to be intimately involved in the induction of conformational changes between subunits in the hexamer by coenzyme. These conformational changes are associated with the negative co-operativity exhibited by this enzyme. 2-Oxoglutarate and L-2-hydroxyglutarate induce indications of co-operativity similar to those induced by the substrate of oxidative deamination, glutamate, in kinetic studies. Glutarate (2-position CH2) does not. A comparison of the effects of L-2-hydroxyglutarate and D-2-hydroxyglutarate or D-glutamate indicates that the 2-position substituent must be in the L-configuration for these conformational changes to be triggered. In addition, glutarate and L-glutamate in ternary enzyme-NAD(P)H-substrate complexes induce very different coenzyme fluorescence properties, showing that glutamate induces a different conformation of the enzyme-coenzyme complex from that induced by glutarate. Although glutamate and glutarate both tighten the binding of reduced coenzyme to the active site, the effect is much greater with glutamate, and the binding is described by two dissociation constants when glutamate is present. The data suggest that the two carboxy groups on the substrate are required to allow synergistic binding of coenzyme and substrate to the active site, but that interactions between the 2-position on the substrate and the enzyme trigger the conformational changes that result in subunit-subunit interactions and in the catalytic co-operativity exhibited by this enzyme.

There was a wide range in the amounts of acid given by the assorted starch foods that were tested. In descending order, the amounts of acid formed were: boiled potato (2.50 +/- 0.10), "special wheat" bread (2.24 +/- 0.68), English muffin (2.19 +/- 0.00), raw potato (2.13 +/- 0.03), yellow cake (2.02 +/- 0.08), plain wheat flour (1.83 +/- 0.03), phosphate-enriched wheat flour (1.83 +/- 0.03), bagel (1.67 +/- 0.05), soft white bread (1.39 +/- 0.05), Italian bread (1.35 +/- 0.08), and pumpernickel bread (1.26 +/- 0.03).