Search

Background: The Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality (VASM) seeks to peer review all deaths associated with surgical care in Victoria, Australia. The effectiveness of the VASM as an educational and quality improvement tool is dependent on the accuracy of source data it receives. We aimed to examine the accuracy and quality of source data provided by the treating surgeon for peer review, and the inter‐rater concordance level between the external validator findings and the treating surgeon. Methods: Of the 629 cases that completed the VASM audit second‐line peer review process over a 4‐year period (from 1 July 2012 to 30 June 2016), a total of 32 (5%) were randomly selected for the external validation process. The blinded external validator was impartial to the VASM audit, and was provided only de‐identified patient medical records. The analysis for the checked and validated data points and their concordance was determined using Gwet's agreement coefficient, which provides a stable inter‐rater reliability coefficient not affected by prevalence and marginal probability. Results: The inter‐rater concordance analysis suggested that there is a high level of agreement (82.9% overall) between the treating surgeon and external validator. The use of thromboembolism deterrent stockings was the only variable where agreement was poor (52.4%) with a Gwet score of 0.10 (−0.40 to 0.60). Conclusion: The inter‐rater concordance analysis results support the validity of the VASM process, which is dependent on the accuracy of data submitted by the treating surgeon. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background The Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality ( VASM) is designed to improve the level of patient care by educating surgeons of areas for improvement in patient management during a surgical admission. Coronial data obtained via the National Coronial Information System were used as an independent method to validate the cause of death as determined by the treating surgeon. Method The audit prospectively collected 4905 cases that underwent peer assessment and 842 (17%) received an in-depth second-line assessment of which 200 (24%) also underwent a coronial review. Using the coronial assessment as the reference standard, retrospective comparison of coronial diagnoses compared with the audit case outcomes was conducted to determine the overall accuracy of the stated cause of death. The degree of agreement was also analysed based on whether the patient received a full autopsy (internal examination) or an external examination only. The time taken to obtain the coronial and audit case closure was also analysed. Results Overall, 195 of the 200 cases had a cause of death identified by the coroner. In 82%, the cause of death reported to VASM by the treating surgeon matched the cause of death determined by the coroner. Concordance was not affected by the extent of post-mortem performed. Time taken to finalize cases was slightly shorter for the coronial process, but unclosed coronial findings resulted in the exclusion of 103 cases. Conclusion The causes of death data in VASM are accurate when compared with the coronial data independent of whether the coronial investigation included a complete autopsy. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Clinical management issues are contributory factors to mortality. The aim of this study was to use data from the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality (VASM), an educational peer-review process for surgeons, to discover differences in the incidence of these issues between surgical specialties in order to focus attention to areas of care that might be improved. Design: This study used retrospectively analysed observational data from VASM. Clinical management issues between eight specialties were assessed using χ2 analysis. Data sources: VASM data were reported by participating public and private health services, the Coroner and self-reporting surgeons across Victoria. Results: A total of 2946 specific clinical issues as deficiencies of care were reported. 15% of cases had significant issues of care. The most common clinical management issue was the delay in delivery of treatment. Other clinical issues included the quality of communication and documentation, preoperative and postoperative care, adverse events and protocol issues. There were significant differences in issues between specialties. Conclusions: The clinical management issues presented across surgical specialties were similar; however, five issues of clinical care differed significantly in frequency across surgical specialties. The three main issues varying among specialties were complications after operation, communication and postoperative care. Addressing these clinical management issues via the peer-review process may impact positively on patient care. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Clinical audits can vary in their effectiveness depending on how the information is provided and the relationship between those giving and receiving feedback. In the Australian state of Victoria, the Victorian Audit of Surgical Mortality (VASM) is a state-wide mortality audit that, prior to this study, did not have a bidirectional feedback mechanism in place to gauge perception of the audit held by its stakeholders., Objective: We aimed to investigate the perceived quality of the audit's information and the effectiveness of the audit's communication strategies from the stakeholder population., Methods: We used a mixed methods approach to provide open-ended explorations into stakeholders' views while also providing structured tools for conducting annual reviews. The qualitative data were analysed using an inductive content analysis., Results: Between 2015 and 2017, 240 VASM stakeholders were contacted, of whom 82 (34.2%) agreed to be interviewed. The VASM's data were perceived to be of high quality and used in a variety of ways. The audit's communication strategies were seen to be adequate but could be more targeted to the stakeholder. There is a perception that the audit might not be relevant to hospital stakeholders that are not themselves clinicians, despite direct involvement with the audit., Conclusion: This study helps to explain the role the audit plays among its stakeholders and offers three overarching recommendations for improvement strategies: produce data sharing strategies that are relevant to rural or highly specialised surgical centres, improve communication to be targeted at stakeholders and explore methods to provide feedback to hospital management with more individualised feedback.