Search

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is known as an autoimmune disorder that is characterized by the breakdown of self‐tolerance, resulting in disease onset and progression. Macrophages have been implicated as a factor in the development of SLE through faulty phagocytosis of dead cells or an imbalanced M1/M2 ratio. The study aimed to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus on M1 and M2 macrophages in new case lupus patients. For this purpose, blood monocytes were collected from lupus patients and healthy people and were cultured for 5 days to produce macrophages. For 48 h, the macrophages were then cocultured with either probiotics or lipopolysaccharides (LPS). Flow cytometry and real‐time polymerase chain reaction were then used to analyze the expression of cluster of differentiation (CD) 14, CD80, and human leukocyte antigen – DR (HLADR) markers, as well as cytokine expression (interleukin [IL]1‐β, IL‐12, tumor necrosis factor α [TNF‐α], IL‐10, and transforming growth factor beta [TGF‐β]). The results indicated three distinct macrophage populations, M0, M1, and M2. In both control and patient‐derived macrophage‐derived monocytes (MDMs), the probiotic groups showed a decrease in CD14, CD80, and HLADR expression compared to the LPS group. This decrease was particularly evident in M0 and M2 macrophages from lupus patients and M1 macrophages from healthy subjects. In addition, the probiotic groups showed increased levels of IL‐10 and TGF‐β and decreased levels of IL‐12, IL1‐β, and TNF‐α in MDMs from both healthy and lupus subjects compared to the LPS groups. Although there was a higher expression of pro‐inflammatory cytokines in lupus patients, there was a higher expression of anti‐inflammatory cytokines in healthy subjects. In general, L. delbrueckii and L. rhamnosus could induce anti‐inflammatory effects on MDMs from both healthy and lupus subjects. Significance statement: Macrophages have been implicated as a factor in the development of systemic lupus erythematosus through faulty phagocytosis of dead cells or an imbalanced M1/M2 ratio. The study aimed to investigate the immunomodulatory effects of Lactobacillus delbrueckii and Lactobacillus rhamnosus on M1 and M2 macrophages in new case lupus patients. L. delbrueckii and L. rhamnosus could induce anti‐inflammatory effects on macrophage‐derived monocytes (MDMs) from both healthy and lupus subjects. In both control and patient‐derived MDMs, the probiotic groups showed a decrease in cluster of differentiation (CD) 14, CD80, and Human Leukocyte Antigen – DR expression compared to the lipopolysaccharides (LPS) group. Also observed the increased levels of interleukin (IL)‐10 and transforming growth factor beta and decreased levels of IL‐12, IL1‐β, and tumor necrosis factor α in MDMs from both healthy and lupus subjects compared to the LPS groups. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: Nowadays, the use of telemedicine diagnosis and treatment of various diseases has been considered by physicians, especially in such diseases as rheumatoid arthritis (RA), where patients have more weakness and inability to move. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the extent of measurable and nonmeasurable factors in patients with RA and their satisfaction with this method of care. Methods: The articles published by March 3, 2022, were searched in four databases, including Web of Sciences, Medline, PubMed, and Scopus. This research was conducted using the seven steps of the Cochrane Handbook as a guide. The searched keywords included telemedicine, tele‐rheumatoid, rheumatoid arthritis, and immune diseases. Results: A total of 18 articles were included in the present study. In most of these studies, physicians and patients were satisfied with this approach. Nonetheless, there was a dearth of studies on the measurement of evaluable and nonevaluable factors. Conclusion: Studies on the benefits of telemedicine for rheumatology are still limited. The effectiveness of this new healthcare approach in diagnosing and evaluating disease activity is still unclear. Some studies demonstrated patient and physician satisfaction with this treatment. In some cases, there is a tendency to show a high risk of bias. In addition, it is unclear to what extent the use of rheumatology traps affects the establishment of medical relationships. It is recommended that more clinical trials be conducted to examine this relationship. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background & Objective: Systemic Lupus Erythematosus (SLE) is a multisystem autoimmune disorder that its symptoms could affect all aspects of a patient’s quality of life (QoL).This study aimed to assess the quality of life of SLE patients and compare them with those of healthy individuals. It also attempted to compare the QoL of SLE patients suffering from minor and major organ involvement to that of healthy individuals. Materials & Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted at the Rheumatic Diseases Research Center, Mashhad, Iran, from 2018 to 2019. A total of 280 participants were selected and divided into two groups of patients with SLE (n=139, one of whom was excluded from the case group due to the lack of information.) and healthy controls (n=140). After obtaining the demographic characteristics of the general health, the groups were compared using the 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF36) and the World Health Organization Quality of Life-BREF (WHOQOL-BREF) questionnaire. Results: The mean QoL score was significantly lower in SLE patients, compared to the healthy controls (P<0.001). The total score of QoL was also lower in patients with lung involvement, compared to the healthy controls (P<0.05). Moreover, according to the WHOQOL-BREF, environmental health was lower in patients with lung and skin involvement, compared to the healthy controls (P=0.01). According to the results obtained from the SF-36 questionnaire, the total QoL status was lower in patients with both minor and major organ involvement, compared to the healthy controls (P<0.05). There was also a significant difference between patients with joint involvement and the healthy controls regarding QoL (P=0.02). Conclusion: According to the obtained results, SLE can negatively alter QoL. The severity and activity of the disease in some major organs, including the lung and joints, were associated with reduced QoL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Glucocorticoid receptor a (GRa) gene is a transcription factor with clinically significant immune-modulating properties in various autoimmune diseases. However, the expression pattern of the GRa gene and associations with clinical features in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is controversial. This study aimed to assess the correlation between the GRa expression and different clinical and laboratory-related parameters in SLE patients. Methods: A total of 45 women with newly diagnosed SLE and 31 gender and agematched healthy controls were enrolled in this cross-sectional study. The real-time quantitative PCR (qRT-PCT) method evaluated the differences in GRa expression in peripheral blood mononuclear cells from cases and controls. The correlation between the GRa gene expression levels, clinicolaboratory features, and potential prognostic application was also analyzed. Results: Compared to the healthy individuals, the GRa gene expression in newly diagnosed SLE patients who did not receive any treatment was numerically reduced, but this reduction did not achieve statistical significance (P=0.87). No significant correlation was also found with the activity and severity of SLE according to SLEDAI2K (P=0.41). The GRa gene expression showed a negative correlation with CRP (P=0.034) and a positive correlation with lupus anticoagulant (P=0.039) levels in SLE. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis indicated that the GRa expression level might be a predictor biomarker for low CRP and positive lupus anticoagulant in SLE, respectively. Conclusion: This study proposed that expression of the GRa in newly diagnosed lupus patients has no statistically significant difference with healthy age and sex-matched controls. Besides, its expression does not correlate with lupus disease activity according to SLEDAI2k. However, further studies in this area are required. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Systemic lupus erythematous (SLE) and rheumatoid arthritis (RA) are autoimmune diseases in which the antigen-antibody system plays an important role. As blood group and Rh are determined by the presence or absence of antigens on the surface of red blood cells (RBCs), we aimed to determine the distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups in SLE and RA patients and its association with disease manifestations. Methods: This short communication is based on a study that was conducted on 434 SLE and 828 RA patients. We evaluated the distribution of ABO and Rh blood groups in RA and SLE patients. Results: This study projected that in lupus patients, Coombs-positive autoimmune hemolytic anemia and arthritis were more common among the B blood type and Rh-positive group, respectively. Furthermore, there was no relation between ABO and Rh blood group and rheumatoid factor (RF) and anti-Cyclic Citrullinated Peptide (anti-CCP) seropositivity. Moreover, there was no difference in distribution of blood groups in RA and SLE patients. Conclusion: The higher frequency of blood group B in hemolytic anemia, and positive Rh in arthritis in lupus patients, develop the hypothesis of probable role of ABO blood group antigen in some manifestations of lupus. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]