Search

Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam, a cephalosporin-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, is approved for the treatment of complicated urinary tract infections and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). The safety and efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric participants with cIAI were assessed., Methods: This phase 2 study (NCT03217136) randomized participants to either ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole or meropenem for treatment of cIAI in pediatric participants (<18 years). The primary objective was to assess the safety and tolerability of intravenous ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole. Clinical cure at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) visits were secondary end points., Results: The modified intent-to-treat (MITT) population included 91 participants (ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole, n = 70; meropenem, n = 21). Complicated appendicitis was the most common diagnosis (93.4%); Escherichia coli was the most common pathogen (65.9%). Adverse events (AEs) occurred in 80.0% and 61.9% of participants receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem, drug-related AEs occurred in 18.6% and 14.3% and serious AEs occurred in 11.4% and 0% of participants receiving ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem, respectively. No drug-related serious AEs or discontinuations due to drug-related AEs occurred. Rates of the clinical cure for ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole and meropenem at EOT were 80.0% and 95.2% (difference: -14.3; 95% confidence interval: -26.67 to 4.93) and at TOC were 80.0% and 100.0% (difference: -19.1; 95% confidence interval: -30.18 to -2.89), respectively; 6 of the 14 clinical failures for ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole at TOC were indeterminate responses imputed as failures per protocol., Conclusion: Ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole was well tolerated in pediatric participants with cIAI and had a safety profile similar to the established safety profile in adults. In this descriptive efficacy analysis, ceftolozane/tazobactam+metronidazole appeared efficacious., Competing Interests: J.L., F.-H.S, J.A.H., M.B., M.G.J., C.D.A., E.G.R., and C.J.B. are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC, a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA (MSD), who may own stock and/or hold stock options in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. M.W.P. was an employee of MSD at the time of the study conduct. C.-C.A.J. received consulting fees from MSD and holds stock in Merck & Co., Inc., Rahway, NJ, USA. J.N. reports funding to conduct the study from MSD to his institution. N.D. has no potential conflicts of interest to disclose., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam, a cephalosporin-β-lactamase inhibitor combination, active against multidrug-resistant Gram-negative pathogens, is approved for treatment of adults with complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI). Safety and efficacy of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric participants with cUTI, including pyelonephritis, were assessed., Methods: This phase 2 study (NCT03230838) compared ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treatment of cUTI in participants from birth to <18 years of age. The primary objective was safety and tolerability. Key secondary end points included clinical cure and per-participant microbiologic response rates at end of treatment (EOT) and test of cure (TOC) visits., Results: The microbiologic modified intent-to-treat (mMITT) population included 95 participants (ceftolozane/tazobactam, n = 71; meropenem, n = 24). The most common diagnosis and pathogen were pyelonephritis (ceftolozane/tazobactam, 84.5%; meropenem, 79.2%) and Escherichia coli (ceftolozane/tazobactam, 74.6%; meropenem, 87.5%); 5.7% (ceftolozane/tazobactam) and 4.8% (meropenem) of E. coli isolates were extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producers. Rates of adverse events were similar between treatment groups (any: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 59.0% vs. meropenem, 60.6%; drug-related: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 14.0% vs. meropenem, 15.2%; serious: ceftolozane/tazobactam, 3.0% vs. meropenem, 6.1%). Rates of clinical cure for ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem at EOT were 94.4% and 100% and at TOC were 88.7% and 95.8%, respectively. Rates of microbiologic eradication for ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem at EOT were 93.0% and 95.8%, and at TOC were 84.5% and 87.5%, respectively., Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam had a favorable safety profile in pediatric participants with cUTI; rates of clinical cure and microbiologic eradication were high and similar to meropenem. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a safe and effective new treatment option for children with cUTI, especially due to antibacterial-resistant Gram-negative pathogens., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.)

Probability of target attainment (PTA) analyses were conducted to support the recommended ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing regimens, adjusted for renal function, in patients with hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). Previously published population pharmacokinetic models describing the disposition of ceftolozane and tazobactam in plasma and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) in patients with HABP/VABP were used to simulate ceftolozane and tazobactam concentration-time profiles in plasma and ELF over the course of 14 days. The simulations were conducted for patients with normal renal function and for patients receiving adjusted doses for mild, moderate, and severe renal impairment. PTA was calculated using established pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets for ceftolozane and tazobactam. Across renal function groups, plasma PTA was 100% for ceftolozane and >99% for tazobactam; ELF PTA was >99% for ceftolozane and >87% for tazobactam. These results provided support for the currently recommended ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing regimens for HABP/VABP, which were efficacious and well tolerated in the Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Versus Meropenem for Treatment of Nosocomial Pneumonia (ASPECT-NP) trial., (© 2022 Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and The Authors. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

ASPECT-NP, a phase 3 trial of ceftolozane/tazobactam in hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP), excluded patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD). A modeling/simulation approach was undertaken to inform optimal dosing in this population, using previously developed ceftolozane and tazobactam population pharmacokinetic models informed by data from 16 clinical studies. Stochastic simulations were performed using NONMEM to support dose justification. Probability of target attainment (PTA) simulations in plasma and epithelial lining fluid were conducted using a 14-day treatment, with hemodialysis every other weekday for a high-dose (4X), middle-dose (3X), or low-dose (2X) regimen, where X was the recommended dose in patients with complicated intra-abdominal infection/complicated urinary tract infection and ESRD (500 mg/250 mg ceftolozane/tazobactam loading dose and 100 mg/50 mg ceftolozane/tazobactam maintenance dose administered by 1-hour infusion every 8 hours). PTA was determined using established pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic targets: ceftolozane, 30% of the interdose interval (8 hours) in which free ceftolozane concentration exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration value of 4 µg/mL; tazobactam, 20% of the interdose interval in which free tazobactam concentration exceeded 1 µg/mL. Plasma PTA was >90% for both agents for all 3 regimens. Plasma ceftolozane exposures at the high-dose regimen exceeded those from phase 3 study experience. Epithelial lining fluid PTA was >90% for high- and middle-dose regimens but was <80% for tazobactam on dialysis days at the low-dose regimen. For patients with HABP/VABP and ESRD requiring intermittent hemodialysis, the middle-dose regimen of 1.5 g/0.75 g ceftolozane/tazobactam loading + 300 mg/150 mg maintenance every 8 hours by 1-hour infusion is recommended., (© 2022 Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC. The Journal of Clinical Pharmacology published by Wiley Periodicals LLC on behalf of American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

An exposure-efficacy analysis of the phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial was performed to evaluate the relationship between plasma exposure of ceftolozane and tazobactam and efficacy endpoints (primary: 28-day all-cause mortality; key secondary: clinical cure at test-of-cure visit) in adult participants with hospital-acquired or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP). Participants ( N  =   231) from the ceftolozane/tazobactam treatment group in the intention-to-treat population who had pharmacokinetic data available and relevant baseline lower respiratory tract (LRT) pathogen(s) susceptibility data were included. Population pharmacokinetic models were used to predict individual ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma exposure measures (percentage of the interdose interval with free drug concentrations above the MIC [% ƒ T>MIC] and % ƒ T above a threshold [% ƒ T>C T = 1 μg/mL], respectively) associated with the last dose using the highest ceftolozane/tazobactam MIC for the relevant baseline LRT pathogens. Efficacy measures were comparable between the baseline LRT pathogens and across MIC cutoffs (1-8 μg/mL). Most participants (82%) had 99% ƒ T>MIC for ceftolozane; 9% ( N  =   21/231) had 0% ƒT>MIC due to high MICs of the LRT pathogen (64-256 μg/mL). The %ƒT>MIC for ceftolozane exceeded 73% for all participants with baseline LRT pathogen(s) MIC ≤4 μg/mL. All 231 participants achieved the tazobactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target of >20% ƒ T>C T where C T = 1 μg/mL. For either efficacy endpoint, median ceftolozane %ƒT>MIC was 99% in participants achieving efficacy. No exposure-efficacy trend was observed for ceftolozane or tazobactam. These results further support the recommended ceftolozane/tazobactam dosing regimens evaluated in ASPECT-NP for patients with HABP/VABP.

Objectives: In the ASPECT-NP trial, ceftolozane/tazobactam was non-inferior to meropenem for treating nosocomial pneumonia; efficacy outcomes by causative pathogen were to be evaluated., Methods: Mechanically ventilated participants with hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia were randomized to 3 g ceftolozane/tazobactam (2 g ceftolozane/1 g tazobactam) q8h or 1 g meropenem q8h. Lower respiratory tract (LRT) cultures were obtained ≤36 h before first dose; pathogen identification and susceptibility were confirmed at a central laboratory. Prospective secondary per-pathogen endpoints included 28 day all-cause mortality (ACM), and clinical and microbiological response at test of cure (7-14 days after the end of therapy) in the microbiological ITT (mITT) population., Results: The mITT population comprised 511 participants (264 ceftolozane/tazobactam, 247 meropenem). Baseline LRT pathogens included Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25.0%) and Escherichia coli (18.2%). Among baseline Enterobacterales isolates, 171/456 (37.5%) were ESBL positive. For Gram-negative baseline LRT pathogens, susceptibility rates were 87.0% for ceftolozane/tazobactam and 93.3% for meropenem. For Gram-negative pathogens, 28 day ACM [52/259 (20.1%) and 62/240 (25.8%)], clinical cure rates [157/259 (60.6%) and 137/240 (57.1%)] and microbiological eradication rates [189/259 (73.0%) and 163/240 (67.9%)] were comparable with ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem, respectively. Per-pathogen microbiological eradication for Enterobacterales [145/195 (74.4%) and 129/185 (69.7%); 95% CI: -4.37 to 13.58], ESBL-producing Enterobacterales [56/84 (66.7%) and 52/73 (71.2%); 95% CI: -18.56 to 9.93] and P. aeruginosa [47/63 (74.6%) and 41/65 (63.1%); 95% CI: -4.51 to 19.38], respectively, were also comparable., Conclusions: In mechanically ventilated participants with nosocomial pneumonia owing to Gram-negative pathogens, ceftolozane/tazobactam was comparable with meropenem for per-pathogen 28 day ACM and clinical and microbiological response., (© The Author(s) 2022. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy. All rights reserved. For permissions, please e-mail: journals.permissions@oup.com.)

Background: The randomized, double-blind, phase 3 ASPECT-NP trial evaluated the efficacy of 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) versus 1 g of meropenem infused every 8 h for 8 to 14 days for treatment of adults with hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia (HABP) or ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (VABP). We assessed the probability of target attainment and compared efficacy outcomes from ASPECT-NP in participants with augmented renal clearance (ARC) versus those with normal renal function., Methods: Baseline renal function was categorized as normal renal function (creatinine clearance 80-130 mL/min) or ARC (creatinine clearance > 130 mL/min). Population pharmacokinetic models informed Monte Carlo simulations to assess probability of target attainment in plasma and pulmonary epithelial lining fluid. Outcomes included 28-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure and per-participant microbiologic cure rates at the test-of-cure visit., Results: A > 99% and > 80% probability of target attainment was demonstrated for ceftolozane and tazobactam, respectively, in simulated plasma and epithelial lining fluid. Within treatment arms, 28-day all-cause mortality rates in participants with normal renal function (C/T, n = 131; meropenem, n = 123) and ARC (C/T, n = 96; meropenem, n = 113) were comparable (data comparisons presented as rate; treatment difference [95% CI]) (C/T: normal renal function, 17.6%; ARC, 17.7%; 0.2 [- 9.6 to 10.6]; meropenem: normal renal function, 20.3%; ARC, 17.7%; - 2.6 [- 12.6 to 7.5]). Clinical cure rates at test-of-cure were also comparable across renal function groups within treatment arms (C/T: normal renal function, 57.3%; ARC, 59.4%; - 2.1 [- 14.8 to 10.8]; meropenem: normal renal function, 59.3%; ARC, 57.5%; 1.8 [- 10.6 to 14.2]). Per-participant microbiologic cure rates at test-of-cure were consistent across renal function groups within treatment arms (C/T: normal renal function, 72.2% [n/N = 70/97]; ARC, 71.4% [n/N = 55/77]; 0.7 [- 12.4 to 14.2]; meropenem: normal renal function, 75.0% [n/N = 66/88]; ARC, 70.0% [n/N = 49/70]; 5.0 [- 8.7 to 19.0])., Conclusions: C/T and meropenem resulted in 28-day all-cause mortality, clinical cure, and microbiologic cure rates that were comparable between participants with ARC or normal renal function. In conjunction with high probability of target attainment, these results confirm that C/T (3 g) every 8 h is appropriate in patients with HABP/VABP and ARC. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02070757, registered February 25, 2014; EudraCT: 2012-002862-11., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Background: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for treatment of hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia (HABP/VABP) at double the dose approved for other infection sites. Among nosocomial pneumonia subtypes, ventilated HABP (vHABP) is associated with the lowest survival. In the ASPECT-NP randomized, controlled trial, participants with vHABP treated with ceftolozane/tazobactam had lower 28-day all-cause mortality (ACM) than those receiving meropenem. We conducted a series of post hoc analyses to explore the clinical significance of this finding., Methods: ASPECT-NP was a multinational, phase 3, noninferiority trial comparing ceftolozane/tazobactam with meropenem for treating vHABP and VABP; study design, efficacy, and safety results have been reported previously. The primary endpoint was 28-day ACM. The key secondary endpoint was clinical response at test-of-cure. Participants with vHABP were a prospectively defined subgroup, but subgroup analyses were not powered for noninferiority testing. We compared baseline and treatment factors, efficacy, and safety between ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem in participants with vHABP. We also conducted a retrospective multivariable logistic regression analysis in this subgroup to determine the impact of treatment arm on mortality when adjusted for significant prognostic factors., Results: Overall, 99 participants in the ceftolozane/tazobactam and 108 in the meropenem arm had vHABP. 28-day ACM was 24.2% and 37.0%, respectively, in the intention-to-treat population (95% confidence interval [CI] for difference: 0.2, 24.8) and 18.2% and 36.6%, respectively, in the microbiologic intention-to-treat population (95% CI 2.5, 32.5). Clinical cure rates in the intention-to-treat population were 50.5% and 44.4%, respectively (95% CI - 7.4, 19.3). Baseline clinical, baseline microbiologic, and treatment factors were comparable between treatment arms. Multivariable regression identified concomitant vasopressor use and baseline bacteremia as significantly impacting ACM in ASPECT-NP; adjusting for these two factors, the odds of dying by day 28 were 2.3-fold greater when participants received meropenem instead of ceftolozane/tazobactam., Conclusions: There were no underlying differences between treatment arms expected to have biased the observed survival advantage with ceftolozane/tazobactam in the vHABP subgroup. After adjusting for clinically relevant factors found to impact ACM significantly in this trial, the mortality risk in participants with vHABP was over twice as high when treated with meropenem compared with ceftolozane/tazobactam., Trial Registration: clinicaltrials.gov, NCT02070757. Registered 25 February, 2014, clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT02070757., (© 2021. The Author(s).)

Objective: New treatments are needed for multidrug-resistant (MDR) gram-negative infections in neonates. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is a β-lactam/β-lactamase inhibitor combination that has broad-spectrum activity against most common gram-negative bacteria, including MDR strains. We evaluated pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of ceftolozane/tazobactam in term and premature neonates and young infants., Study Design: This is a subgroup analysis of a phase 1, noncomparative, open-label, multicenter study that characterized the PK, safety, and tolerability of a single intravenous (IV) dose of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric patients with proven/suspected gram-negative infection or receiving perioperative prophylaxis., Results: Seven patients were enrolled in Group A (birth [7 days postnatal] to < 3 months, > 32 weeks gestation) and six patients were enrolled in Group B (birth [7 days postnatal] to < 3 months, ≤ 32 weeks gestation). PK profiles in neonates and young infants were generally comparable to those of older children receiving a single IV dose of ceftolozane/tazobactam. No serious adverse events (AEs), treatment-related AEs, severe AEs, or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were reported., Conclusion: Among term and premature neonates and young infants, PK was comparable to older children and ceftolozane/tazobactam was generally well tolerated. An adaptable and flexible study design is necessary for enrollment in neonatal PK trials., Competing Interests: J.Y.A. has received institutional research funding and honoraria from Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ. A.A. has received institutional research funding from Merck & Co., Inc.. J.S.B. participated as an investigator in this trial, and his employer received funding for institutional research and protocol design from Merck & Co., Inc.. Z.Z., B.Y., M.L.R., M.G.J., and E.G.R. are employees of Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., a subsidiary of Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ, and may own stock and/or hold stock options in Merck & Co., Inc., Kenilworth, NJ., (Thieme. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine whether established ceftolozane/tazobactam (C/T) dosing is adequate for patients with augmented renal clearance (ARC) and bacterial infection., Methods: ARC (creatinine clearance [CrCl] ≥ 130 mL/min) was confirmed by directly measured CrCl in 11 critically ill patients in a phase 1 pharmacokinetics study. Patients received 3 g C/T (ceftolozane 2 g/tazobactam 1 g) as a 60-minute intravenous infusion. Pharmacokinetic sampling occurred at 0 (predose), 1, 2, 4, 6, and 8 hours after the start of the infusion. Noncompartmental analyses were conducted on concentration data. The following pharmacodynamic targets were evaluated: time that free (unbound) drug concentrations exceeded the minimum inhibitory concentration (fT>MIC) of 4 μg/mL for ceftolozane and time that the unbound concentration exceeded the 1 μg/mL target threshold (fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL) for > 20% of the dosing interval for tazobactam. Safety was evaluated., Results: Mean (SD) area under the plasma concentration-time curve from 0 to infinity, clearance and volume of distribution at steady state (V ss ) were 236 (118) h*µg/mL, 10.4 (4.5) L/h and 30.8 (10.8) L, respectively, for ceftolozane; and 35.5 (18.5) h*µg/mL, 35.3 (16.5) L/h and 54.8 (20.1) L, respectively, for tazobactam. Clearance and V ss were higher for both ceftolozane and tazobactam in patients with ARC compared with healthy individuals. The mean estimated ceftolozane fT>MIC at 4 µg/mL was 86.4%; the mean estimated tazobactam fT>threshold = 1 µg/mL was 54.9%. Treatment-emergent adverse events were mild to moderate., Conclusions: In patients with ARC, a 3 g C/T dose met respective pharmacodynamic targets for ceftolozane and tazobactam. CLINICALTRIALS., Gov Identifier: NCT02387372., (Copyright © 2021 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The emergence of nonsusceptibility to ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem was evaluated among Pseudomonas aeruginosa (P. aeruginosa) lower respiratory tract isolates obtained from participants in the ASPECT-NP clinical trial., Methods: ASPECT-NP was a phase-3, randomised, double-blind, multicentre trial that demonstrated noninferiority of 3 g ceftolozane/tazobactam q8h versus 1 g meropenem q8h for treatment of ventilated hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Molecular resistance mechanisms among postbaseline nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolates and clinical outcomes associated with participants with emergence of nonsusceptibility were examined. Baseline susceptible and postbaseline nonsusceptible P. aeruginosa isolate pairs from the same participant underwent molecular typing., Results: Emergence of nonsusceptibility was not observed among the 59 participants with baseline susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates in the ceftolozane/tazobactam arm. Among 58 participants with baseline susceptible P. aeruginosa isolates in the meropenem arm, emergence of nonsusceptibility was observed in 13 (22.4%). Among participants who received ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem, 5.1% and 3.4% had a new infection with a nonsusceptible strain, respectively. None of the isolates with emergence of nonsusceptibility to meropenem developed co-resistance to ceftolozane/tazobactam. The molecular mechanisms associated with emergence of nonsusceptibility to meropenem were decreased expression or loss of OprD and overexpression of MexXY., Conclusions: Among participants with emergence of nonsusceptibility to meropenem, clinical outcomes were similar to overall clinical outcomes in the ASPECT-NP meropenem arm. Ceftolozane/tazobactam was more stable to emergence of nonsusceptibility versus meropenem; emergence of nonsusceptibility was not observed in any participants with baseline susceptible P. aeruginosa who received ceftolozane/tazobactam in ASPECT-NP., (Copyright © 2021. Published by Elsevier Ltd.)

We reviewed β-lactam-resistant baseline Enterobacterales species and Pseudomonas aeruginosa lower respiratory tract isolates collected during the ASPECT-NP phase 3 clinical trial that evaluated the safety and efficacy of ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with meropenem for the treatment of nosocomial pneumonia in ventilated adults. Isolates were subjected to whole-genome sequencing, real-time PCR for the quantification of the expression levels of β-lactamase and efflux pump genes, and Western blot analysis for the detection of OprD ( P. aeruginosa only). Extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) genes were detected in 168 of 262 Enterobacterales isolates, and among these, bla CTX-M-15 was the most common, detected in 125 isolates. Sixty-one Enterobacterales isolates carried genes encoding carbapenemases, while 33 isolates did not carry ESBLs or carbapenemases. Carbapenemase-producing isolates carried mainly NDM and OXA-48 variants, with ceftolozane-tazobactam MIC values ranging from 4 to 128 µg/ml. Most ceftolozane-tazobactam-nonsusceptible Enterobacterales isolates that did not carry carbapenemases were Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates that exhibited disrupted OmpK35, specific mutations in OmpK36, and, in some isolates, elevated expression of bla CTX-M-15 Among 89 P. aeruginosa isolates, carbapenemases and ESBL-encoding genes were observed in 12 and 22 isolates, respectively. P. aeruginosa isolates without acquired β-lactamases displaying elevated expression of AmpC (14 isolates), elevated expression of efflux pumps (11 isolates), and/or a decrease or loss of OprD (22 isolates) were susceptible to ceftolozane-tazobactam. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was active against >75% of the Enterobacterales isolates from the ASPECT-NP trial that did not carry carbapenemases. K. pneumoniae strains resistant to ceftolozane-tazobactam might represent a challenge for treatment due to their multiple resistance mechanisms. Ceftolozane-tazobactam was among the agents that displayed the greatest activity against P. aeruginosa isolates. (This study has been registered at ClinicalTrials.gov under registration no. NCT02070757.)., (Copyright © 2021 American Society for Microbiology.)

Background: The antipseudomonal cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitor combination ceftolozane/tazobactam could be a potential treatment option for cystic fibrosis (CF) pulmonary exacerbations. The pharmacokinetics (PK) of ceftolozane/tazobactam in children with CF merits further evaluation., Methods: This is a retrospective subgroup analysis of a phase 1, noncomparative trial that characterized PK, safety, and tolerability of single intravenous doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric patients. This analysis compares ceftolozane and tazobactam plasma PK parameters, estimated from a population PK model, between patients with and without CF enrolled in that trial. Individual attainment of PK/pharmacodynamic (PD) targets of ceftolozane and tazobactam (free ceftolozane concentration >4 µg/mL for >30% and free tazobactam concentration >1 µg/mL for 20% of the dosing interval) in patients with and without CF were evaluated., Results: The study enrolled 18 patients aged greater than or equal to 2 to less than 18 years old, which included 9 with CF. Weight-normalized ceftolozane PK parameters were similar between patients with CF (clearance: 0.16 L/h/kg, half-life: 1.54 hours, volume of distribution: 0.26 L/kg) and without CF (clearance: 0.15 L/h/kg, half-life: 1.62 hours, volume of distribution: 0.26 L/kg), as were most weight-normalized tazobactam PK parameters. Weight-normalized tazobactam clearance was higher in patients with CF (0.73 L/h/kg) than patients without CF (0.42 L/h/kg). All patients achieved the prespecified PK/PD targets for ceftolozane and tazobactam., Conclusions: This retrospective analysis demonstrated generally similar weight-normalized plasma PK parameters for ceftolozane and tazobactam among children with and without CF; thus, projected doses for treatment of pediatric hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated pneumonia, which are higher than the pediatric complicated urinary tract infection/intra-abdominal infection doses, may be appropriate for treatment of CF pulmonary exacerbation., (© 2020 Wiley Periodicals LLC.)

Objectives: Ceftolozane/tazobactam is approved for hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia at double the dose (i.e. 2 g/1 g) recommended for other indications. We evaluated the bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile of this 3 g ceftolozane/tazobactam regimen in ventilated pneumonia patients., Methods: This was an open-label, multicentre, Phase 1 trial (clinicaltrials.gov: NCT02387372). Mechanically ventilated patients with proven/suspected pneumonia received four to six doses of 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam (adjusted for renal function) q8h. Serial plasma samples were collected after the first and last doses. One bronchoalveolar lavage sample per patient was collected at 1, 2, 4, 6 or 8 h after the last dose and epithelial lining fluid (ELF) drug concentrations were determined. Pharmacokinetic parameters were estimated by non-compartmental analysis and pharmacodynamic analyses were conducted to graphically evaluate achievement of target exposures (plasma and ELF ceftolozane concentrations >4 mg/L and tazobactam concentrations >1 mg/L; target in plasma: ≥30% and ≥20% of the dosing interval, respectively)., Results: Twenty-six patients received four to six doses of study drug; 22 were included in the ELF analyses. Ceftolozane and tazobactam Tmax (6 and 2 h, respectively) were delayed in ELF compared with plasma (1 h). Lung penetration, expressed as the ratio of mean drug exposure (AUC) in ELF to plasma, was 50% (ceftolozane) and 62% (tazobactam). Mean ceftolozane and tazobactam ELF concentrations remained >4 mg/L and >1 mg/L, respectively, for 100% of the dosing interval. There were no deaths or adverse event-related study discontinuations., Conclusions: In ventilated pneumonia patients, 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam q8h yielded ELF exposures considered adequate to cover ceftolozane/tazobactam-susceptible respiratory pathogens., (© The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Society for Antimicrobial Chemotherapy.)

The effects of supratherapeutic doses of intravenous (IV) relebactam on duration of ventricular depolarization and subsequent repolarization were assessed in a thorough QT/corrected QT study. This was a single-dose, double-blind (relebactam only), randomized, placebo- and positive-controlled, 3-period, balanced crossover study in healthy participants. Participants received in randomized order, and separated by a washout (≥4 days), a single dose of IV relebactam 1150 mg, oral moxifloxacin 400 mg (open-label positive control), and IV placebo. Least squares mean and 2-sided 90% confidence interval for change from baseline in population-derived corrected QT intervals for relebactam, moxifloxacin, and placebo were estimated for 24 hours. The upper limit of the 90% confidence interval of all least squares mean population-derived corrected QT treatment differences from placebo was not >10 milliseconds at any time point for 24 hours. Corrected QT assay sensitivity was confirmed with moxifloxacin treatment. Analysis of electrocardiogram parameters resulted in no additional cardiac safety concerns. Overall, a supratherapeutic dose of relebactam yielded no cardiac safety events; the 1150-mg supratherapeutic dose (4.6-fold above the 250-mg therapeutic dose) was not associated with QT prolongation or other abnormal cardiodynamic parameters. This study lends additional support to relebactam's use as a β-lactamase inhibitor in antimicrobial therapy., (© 2020, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

Aims: Two phase 1, open-label studies were conducted to investigate the effect of renal impairment (RI) and organic anion transporter (OAT) inhibition on pharmacokinetics (PK) and safety of relebactam (REL) plus imipenem/cilastatin (IMI)., Methods: Study PN005 evaluated the PK of REL (125 mg) plus IMI (250 mg) in participants with RI vs healthy controls. Study PN019 evaluated the PK of REL (250 mg) and imipenem (500 mg; dosed as IMI) with/without probenecid (1 g; OAT inhibitor) in healthy adults., Results: Geometric mean ratios (RI/healthy matched controls) of area under the concentration-time curve from time 0 to infinity (AUC 0-∞ ; 90% confidence interval) for REL, imipenem and cilastatin increased as RI increased from mild (1.6 [1.1, 2.4], 1.4 [1.1, 1.8] and 1.6 [1.0, 2.5], respectively) to severe (4.9 [3.4, 7.0], 2.5 [1.9, 3.3] and 5.6 [3.6, 8.6], respectively). For all 3 analytes, plasma and renal clearance decreased and corresponding plasma apparent terminal half-life increased with increasing RI. Geometric mean ratios ([probenecid+IMI/REL]/[IMI/REL]) of plasma exposure for REL and imipenem were 1.24 (1.19, 1.28) and 1.16 (1.13, 1.20), respectively. The dose fraction excreted (fe) in the urine decreased progressively from mild to severe RI. Probenecid reduced renal clearance of REL and imipenem by 25 and 31%, respectively. Compared with IMI/REL, coadministration of IMI/REL with probenecid yielded lower fe for REL and imipenem. In both studies, treatment was well tolerated; there were no serious adverse events or discontinuations due to adverse events., Conclusion: RI increased plasma exposure and similarly decreased clearance of REL, imipenem and cilastatin; IMI/REL dose adjustment (fixed-ratio) will be required for patients with RI. Probenecid had no clinically meaningful impact on the PK of REL or imipenem., (© 2019 The British Pharmacological Society.)

Background: Nosocomial pneumonia due to antimicrobial-resistant pathogens is associated with high mortality. We assessed the efficacy and safety of the combination antibacterial drug ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia., Methods: We conducted a randomised, controlled, double-blind, non-inferiority trial at 263 hospitals in 34 countries. Eligible patients were aged 18 years or older, were undergoing mechanical ventilation, and had nosocomial pneumonia (either ventilator-associated pneumonia or ventilated hospital-acquired pneumonia). Patients were randomly assigned (1:1) with block randomisation (block size four), stratified by type of nosocomial pneumonia and age (<65 years vs ≥65 years), to receive either 3 g ceftolozane-tazobactam or 1 g meropenem intravenously every 8 h for 8-14 days. The primary endpoint was 28-day all-cause mortality (at a 10% non-inferiority margin). The key secondary endpoint was clinical response at the test-of-cure visit (7-14 days after the end of therapy; 12·5% non-inferiority margin). Both endpoints were assessed in the intention-to-treat population. Investigators, study staff, patients, and patients' representatives were masked to treatment assignment. Safety was assessed in all randomly assigned patients who received study treatment. This trial was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02070757., Findings: Between Jan 16, 2015, and April 27, 2018, 726 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned, 362 to the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 364 to the meropenem group. Overall, 519 (71%) patients had ventilator-associated pneumonia, 239 (33%) had Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation II scores of at least 20, and 668 (92%) were in the intensive care unit. At 28 days, 87 (24·0%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 92 (25·3%) in the meropenem group had died (weighted treatment difference 1·1% [95% CI -5·1 to 7·4]). At the test-of-cure visit 197 (54%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 194 (53%) in the meropenem group were clinically cured (weighted treatment difference 1·1% [95% CI -6·2 to 8·3]). Ceftolozane-tazobactam was thus non-inferior to meropenem in terms of both 28-day all-cause mortality and clinical cure at test of cure. Treatment-related adverse events occurred in 38 (11%) of 361 patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and 27 (8%) of 359 in the meropenem group. Eight (2%) patients in the ceftolozane-tazobactam group and two (1%) in the meropenem group had serious treatment-related adverse events. There were no treatment-related deaths., Interpretation: High-dose ceftolozane-tazobactam is an efficacious and well tolerated treatment for Gram-negative nosocomial pneumonia in mechanically ventilated patients, a high-risk, critically ill population., Funding: Merck & Co., (Copyright © 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Ceftolozane-tazobactam, a combination of the novel antipseudomonal cephalosporin ceftolozane and the well-established extended-spectrum β-lactamase inhibitor tazobactam, is approved for treating complicated urinary tract infections (cUTI) and complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI) in adults. To determine doses likely to be safe and efficacious in phase 2 pediatric trials for the same indications, single-dose ceftolozane-tazobactam plasma pharmacokinetic data from a recently completed phase 1 trial in pediatric patients (birth to <18 years old) with proven/suspected Gram-negative bacterial infections, along with pharmacokinetic data from 12 adult studies, were integrated into a population pharmacokinetic (popPK) analysis. Two-compartment linear models with first-order elimination described the concentration-time profiles of ceftolozane and tazobactam in pediatric patients well. Renal function and body weight were identified to be significant predictors of ceftolozane-tazobactam pharmacokinetics. Renal function, as measured by the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR), significantly affected the clearance of both ceftolozane and tazobactam. Body weight significantly affected clearance and the distribution volume, also of both ceftolozane and tazobactam. Patients with infections had a 32.3% lower tazobactam clearance than healthy volunteers. Using the final popPK models, simulations of various dosing regimens were conducted to assess each regimen's plasma exposure and the probability of pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target attainment. Based on these simulations, the following doses are recommended for further clinical evaluation in phase 2 pediatric trials for cUTI and cIAI (in patients with an eGFR of ≥50 ml/min/1.73 m 2 only): for children ≥12 years old, 1.5 g ceftolozane-tazobactam (1 g ceftolozane with 0.5 g tazobactam), and for neonates/very young infants, infants, and children <12 years old, 20/10 mg/kg of body weight ceftolozane-tazobactam, both via a 1-h intravenous infusion every 8 h., (Copyright © 2019 American Society for Microbiology.)

Tazobactam/ceftolozane, a novel antimicrobial therapy, is active against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and most extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacteriaceae. We report the results of the efficacy and safety of tazobactam/ceftolozane in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections (cIAI). A multicenter, open-label, noncomparative study (MK-7625A Protocol 013, ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02739997) to investigate the efficacy and safety of tazobactam/ceftolozane used in combination with metronidazole in Japanese patients with cIAI was conducted. One hundred Japanese patients with cIAI received tazobactam/ceftolozane 1.5 g (tazobactam 0.5 g/ceftolozane 1 g) plus metronidazole 500 mg intravenously every 8 h for 60 min for 4-14 days. The clinical response rate at the Test-of-Cure visit (TOC; Day 28 ± 2 days) was 92.0% (81/88 subjects). By disease type, the clinical response rates were 92.3% (24/26) for cholecystitis, 100% (6/6) for liver abscess, 93.5% (58/62) for intra-abdominal abscess and 90.2% (55/61) for peritonitis. The per-subject microbiological response rate at the TOC was 90.2% (55/61). Per-pathogen microbiological response rates in the most common baseline pathogens were Escherichia coli 90.2% (37/41), Kebsiella pneumoniae 91.7% (11/12), Streptococcus anginosus 100% (11/11), Streptococcus constellatus 90.0% (9/10) and Bacteroides fragilis 95.2% (20/21). The most common drug-related AEs were aspartate aminotransferase increased (11.0%) and alanine aminotransferase increased (9.0%). No serious drug-related AE was reported during the study. The favorable effect of tazobactam/ceftolozane in the treatment of cIAI suggests that the agent will be useful in clinical practice in Japan., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

We report efficacy and safety results for a combination of a novel cephalosporin class antibiotic and a β-Lactamase inhibitor, tazobactam/ceftolozane (1:2) at a dose of 1.5 g intravenously every 8 h in Japanese patients with uncomplicated pyelonephritis and complicated urinary tract infection. This study design was a nonrandomized, multicenter, open-label trial, and the treatment period was 7 days. Of 115 patients enrolled in this study, 114 received tazobactam/ceftolozane, and 90 were included in the efficacy analyses. Ninety-nine isolates (bacterial count ≥10 5  CFU/mL) were identified by urine culture. The main baseline uropathogens were Escherichia coli (80 isolates), Klebsiella pneumoniae (8 isolates), and Proteus mirabilis (3 isolates). Of these, 13 isolates were ESBL-producers. The favorable per-patient microbiological response rate at 7 days after the final administration of tazobactam/ceftolozane was 80.7% (71/88). The response rate in uncomplicated pyelonephritis was 90.0% (36/40), complicated pyelonephritis 63.6% (14/22), and complicated cystitis 80.8% (21/26). The favorable clinical response rate was 96.6% (86/89), and composite response rate (based on microbiological and clinical response) was 80.7% (71/88). The eradication rate by uropathogen was 83.5% (66/79) in E. coli, 42.9% (3/7) in K. pneumoniae, and 100% (3/3) in P. mirabilis. The incidence of drug-related adverse events was 17.5% (20/114 patients). The most common drug-related adverse events were diarrhea and alanine aminotransferase increased in 5.3% (6/114 patients each). Drug-related serious adverse events and deaths were not observed. These results support the safety and efficacy of tazobactam/ceftolozane and suggest it will be a useful treatment for uncomplicated pyelonephritis and complicated urinary tract infection., (Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.)

Background: Drug-resistant Gram-negative bacteria are a growing threat to children; thus new antibiotics are needed to treat infections caused by these pathogens. Ceftolozane/tazobactam is active against many Gram-negative pathogens and is approved for treatment of complicated intra-abdominal and urinary tract infections in adults, but has not been evaluated in children., Methods: This phase 1, noncomparative, open-label, multicenter study characterized the pharmacokinetics (by noncompartmental analysis), safety, and tolerability of single intravenous doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam in pediatric patients (birth [7 days postnatal] to < 18 years of age) with proven/suspected Gram-negative infection or receiving perioperative prophylaxis (clinicaltrials.gov NCT02266706). Patients were enrolled into 1 of 6 age groups to receive a single, age-based ceftolozane/tazobactam dose, with timed blood sample collection for determining plasma concentrations of ceftolozane and tazobactam. Safety and tolerability were also evaluated., Results: Thirty-seven patients received study drug; 34 were included in the pharmacokinetic population. Ceftolozane and tazobactam pharmacokinetic parameters were generally comparable for patients 3 months to < 18 years of age. Patients from birth (7 days postnatal) to < 3 months of age had lower clearance than older children, likely due to the immature renal function of these young infants. No deaths, study drug-related serious adverse events, or clinically significant laboratory abnormalities were observed after administration of ceftolozane/tazobactam., Conclusions: The doses evaluated in this study yielded ceftolozane/tazobactam exposure levels generally comparable with those in adults. Single doses of ceftolozane/tazobactam were well-tolerated, and no safety concerns were identified. These data informed pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic models to derive pediatric dose recommendations for phase 2 ceftolozane/tazobactam clinical trials.

Relebactam is a novel class A and C β-lactamase inhibitor that is being developed in combination with imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of serious infections with Gram-negative bacteria. Here we report on two phase 1 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled pharmacokinetics, safety, and tolerability studies of relebactam administered with or without imipenem-cilastatin to healthy participants: (i) a single-dose (25 to 1,150 mg) and multiple-dose (50 to 625 mg every 6 h [q6h] for 7 to 14 days) escalation study with men and (ii) a single-dose (125 mg) study with women and elderly individuals. Following single- or multiple-dose intravenous administration over 30 min, plasma relebactam concentrations declined biexponentially, with a terminal half-life ( t 1/2 ) ranging from 1.35 to 1.85 h independently of the dose. Exposures increased in a dose-proportional manner across the dose range. No clinically significant differences in pharmacokinetics between men and women, or between adult and elderly participants, were observed. Urine pharmacokinetics demonstrated that urinary excretion is the major route of relebactam elimination. No drug-drug interaction between relebactam and imipenem-cilastatin was observed, and the observed t 1/2 values for relebactam, imipenem, and cilastatin were comparable, thus supporting coadministration. Relebactam administered alone or in combination with imipenem-cilastatin was well tolerated across the dose ranges studied. No serious adverse events or deaths were reported. The pharmacokinetic profile and favorable safety results supported q6h dosing of relebactam with imipenem-cilastatin in clinical treatment trials., (Copyright © 2018 Rhee et al.)

Ceftolozane/tazobactam is an antibacterial approved at 1.5 g (1g/0.5 g) every 8 hours (q8h); higher doses may provide additional benefits in difficult-to-treat infections. We conducted a phase I trial in healthy adults evaluating safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of 3 g (2 g/1 g) ceftolozane/tazobactam administered q8h for 10 days. Sixteen participants were randomized (2:1:1) to 3 g ceftolozane/tazobactam, 1.5 g ceftolozane/tazobactam, or placebo. Participants underwent regular safety and plasma drug level assessments, with a follow-up safety visit 7 days after completion. No adverse events (AEs) were reported with placebo; 75% of participants in the 1.5-g and 50% in the 3-g arm experienced AEs. AE types were similar between the ceftolozane/tazobactam groups; all AEs were mild. No participants experienced clinically meaningful laboratory assessment or electrocardiogram abnormalities. Both ceftolozane and tazobactam exhibited dose-proportional pharmacokinetics without accumulation and without substantial differences in clearance and volume of distribution between groups. In the 3-g group, mean ceftolozane parameters were: peak concentration 104 μg/mL (day 1), 112 μg/mL (day 10); half-life 3 hours (day 10); area under the concentration-time curve (AUC (0-t) ) 272 μg·h/mL (day 1), 300μg·h/mL (day 10). Mean tazobactam parameters were: peak concentration 28 μg/mL (day 1), 26 μg/mL (day 10); half-life 1 hour (day 10); AUC (0-t) 47μg·h/mL (day 1), 41μg·h/mL (day 10). Administration of 3 g ceftolozane/tazobactam q8h for 10 days was safe and well tolerated in healthy volunteers., (© 2018, The American College of Clinical Pharmacology.)

This phase I study assessed the intrapulmonary pharmacokinetic profiles of relebactam (MK-7655), a novel β-lactamase inhibitor, and imipenem. Sixteen healthy subjects received 250 mg relebactam with 500 mg imipenem-cilastatin, given intravenously every 6 h for 5 doses, and were randomized to bronchoscopy/bronchoalveolar lavage at 0.5, 1, 1.5, or 3 h after the last dose (4 subjects per time point). Both drugs penetrated the epithelial lining fluid (ELF) to a similar degree, with the profiles being similar in shape to the corresponding plasma profiles and with the apparent terminal half-lives in plasma and ELF being 1.2 and 1.3 h, respectively, for relebactam and 1.0 h in both compartments for imipenem. The exposure (area under the concentration-time curve from time zero to infinity) in ELF relative to that in plasma was 54% for relebactam and 55% for imipenem, after adjusting for protein binding. ELF penetration for relebactam was further analyzed by fitting the data to a two-compartment pharmacokinetic model to capture its behavior in plasma, with a partitioning coefficient capturing its behavior in the lung compartment. In this model, the time-invariant partition coefficient for relebactam was found to be 55%, based on free drug levels. These results support the clinical evaluation of relebactam with imipenem-cilastatin for the treatment of bacterial pneumonia., (Copyright © 2018 Rizk et al.)

Background: Elastomeric pumps are often used to administer intravenous antibiotics in the outpatient setting, but effective infusion requires that the drug remain stable in solution throughout the procedure., Objective: To determine the chemical stability of ceftolozane/tazobactam when reconstituted and stored over an extended time in the AccuFlo (EMED Technologies, El Dorado Hills, California) and I-Flow Homepump Eclipse (Halyard, Alpharetta, Georgia) elastomeric pumps compared with the results of the label-supporting studies in polyvinylchloride (PVC) bags., Methods: Two ceftolozane/tazobactam dosages were tested for the elastomeric pump studies: 1500 mg (1 g ceftolozane/0.5 g tazobactam) and 150 mg (100 mg ceftolozane/50 mg tazobactam). The solution hold time was evaluated for 10 days at 5°C (±3°C) (tolerance ±3 hours) and for 1 day (24 hours) at ambient room temperature (tolerance ±3 hours). Results of a previously conducted label-supporting PVC intravenous bag study were used as a comparator., Results: At each time point, the visual appearance of all pump and PVC bag solutions remained clear and free of visible particulates, and subvisible particulate matter did not differ significantly between the initial time point and at 10 days. No notable changes in pH in any of the pump or PVC solutions occurred throughout the study. Recovery of ceftolozane and tazobactam was greater than 93% and 94%, respectively, for all samples (elastomeric pump and PVC bag) at 10 days., Conclusions: Ceftolozane/tazobactam remains physically and chemically stable for at least 7 days, as indicated on the US label, when reconstituted, diluted, and stored in the AccuFlo and I-Flow Homepump Eclipse elastomeric pumps and in PVC intravenous bags.

Raltegravir (RAL) is a human immunodeficiency virus type 1 (HIV-1) integrase inhibitor approved to treat HIV infection in adults in combination with other antiretrovirals. The potential of RAL to cause transporter-related drug-drug interactions (DDIs) as an inhibitor has not been well described to date. In this study, a series of in vitro experiments were conducted to assess the inhibitory effects of RAL on major human drug transporters known to be involved in clinically relevant drug interactions, including hepatic and renal uptake transporters and efflux transporters. For hepatic uptake transporters, RAL showed no inhibition of organic anion-transporting polypeptide 1B1 (OATP1B1), weak inhibition of OATP1B3 (40% inhibition at 100 μM), and no inhibition of organic cation transporter 1 (OCT1). Studies of renal uptake transporters showed that RAL inhibited organic anion transporters 1 and 3 (OAT1 and OAT3) with 50% inhibitory concentrations (IC50s) (108 μM and 18.8 μM, respectively) well above the maximum concentration of drug in plasma (Cmax) at the clinical 400-mg dose and did not inhibit organic cation transporter 2 (OCT2). As for efflux transporters, RAL did not inhibit breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) and showed weak inhibition of multidrug and toxin extrusion protein 1 (MATE1) (52% inhibition at 100 μM) and MATE2-K (29% inhibition at 100 μM). These studies indicate that at clinically relevant exposures, RAL does not inhibit or only weakly inhibits hepatic uptake transporters OATP1B1, OATP1B3, and OCT1, renal uptake transporters OCT2, OAT1, and OAT3, as well as efflux transporters BCRP, MATE1, and MATE2-K. The propensity for RAL to cause DDIs via inhibition of these transporters is therefore considered low.

Background: Raltegravir is an HIV-1 integrase inhibitor approved for use in adults, children and infants ≥4 weeks of age. As alternatives to the original film-coated tablet, a chewable ethylcellulose (EC) tablet and oral granules for suspension (GFS) have been developed for use in children. The purpose of this study was to evaluate these formulations in adults prior to use in paediatric studies., Methods: This open-label, 4-period, randomized, crossover study investigated the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of raltegravir paediatric formulations and the effect of a high-fat meal on EC tablet pharmacokinetics in healthy adults. In a balanced, crossover design (with a 4-day washout between treatments), 12 subjects received one 400 mg film-coated tablet (fasted), four 100 mg EC tablets (fasted), one 400 mg GFS dose (fasted) and four 100 mg EC tablets (after a high-fat meal)., Results: AUC0-∞ and Cmax were 2.6-fold and 4.6-fold higher for GFS and 1.8-fold and 3.2-fold higher for EC versus film-coated tablets. The geometric mean C12h values for the GFS formulation (162 nM) and the EC tablet (134 nM) were similar to that of the film-coated tablet (149 nM). Administration with a high-fat meal increased C12h, decreased Cmax and delayed Tmax for the EC tablet, but did not affect AUC0-∞. There were no serious adverse events (AEs) and no discontinuations due to drug-related clinical or laboratory AEs., Conclusions: Both paediatric formulations demonstrate moderately higher AUC0-∞ and Cmax, and similar C12h compared with the film-coated tablet. These data support the use of raltegravir GFS and EC formulations in paediatric studies.

The cellular receptor utilized by adenovirus serotype 26 (Ad26) has remained unclear. Here we show that Ad26 transduction is CD46-dependent and is efficiently blocked by anti-CD46 but not anti-CAR antibodies, demonstrating that Ad26 utilizes CD46 as a primary cellular receptor. Moreover, following Ad26 vaccination of rhesus monkeys, we did not observe sustained activation of peripheral or mucosal vector-specific CD4(+) T lymphocytes. These data contribute to our understanding of Ad26 as a candidate vaccine vector.

The innate immune pathways that contribute to the potent immunogenicity of recombinant adenovirus (rAd) vaccine vectors remain largely undefined. Previous studies assessing innate immunity triggered by vaccine vectors have largely focused on in vitro studies involving antigen-presenting cells and on early in vivo inflammatory responses. Here, we systematically explore the Toll-like receptor (TLR) signaling requirements for the generation of cellular immune responses by intramuscular immunization with common and alternative serotype rAd vectors in mice. Antigen-specific CD8(+) T-lymphocyte responses elicited by these rAd vectors were significantly diminished in MyD88(-/-) mice but not in TRIF(-/-) or TLR3(-/-) mice, suggesting the importance of MyD88-dependent TLR signaling. However, the absence of each individual TLR resulted in minimal to no effect on vaccine-elicited cellular immune responses. Moreover, responses were not diminished in IL-1R(-/-) or IL-18R(-/-) mice. These data suggest that rAd vectors engage multiple MyD88-dependent signaling pathways, none of which are individually critical; rather, they are integrated to contribute to the potent immunogenicity of rAd vectors. Stimulation of multiple innate immune mechanisms may prove a generalizable property of potent vaccines, and this strategy could be harnessed in the development of next-generation vaccine vectors and adjuvants.

Toll-like receptor (TLR) ligands are critical activators of innate immunity and are being developed as vaccine adjuvants. However, their utility in conjunction with viral vector-based vaccines remains unclear. In this study, we evaluated the impact of a variety of TLR ligands on antigen-specific CD8(+) T lymphocyte responses elicited by a recombinant adenovirus serotype 26 (rAd26) vector expressing simian immunodeficiency virus Gag in mice. The TLR3 ligand poly(I:C) suppressed Gag-specific cellular immune responses, whereas the TLR4 ligands lipopolysaccharide and monophosphoryl lipid A substantially augmented the magnitude and functionality of these responses by a MyD88- and TRIF-dependent mechanism. These data demonstrate that TLR ligands can modulate the immunogenicity of viral vaccine vectors both positively and negatively. Moreover, these findings suggest the potential utility of TLR4 ligands as adjuvants for rAd vector-based vaccines.

Innate immunity is critical for shaping vaccine-elicited adaptive immune responses. Several classes of immune sensors, including Toll-like receptors, retinoic acid-inducible gene-I-like receptors, nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain-like receptors and cytosolic DNA receptors mediate important innate immune pathways and provide potential targets for novel adjuvant development. Understanding how innate immunity modulates adaptive immune responses will probably be important for optimizing vaccine candidates. Here, we review recent advances in innate immunity, focusing upon their potential applications in developing adjuvants and vectors for HIV vaccines.

We studied here the long-term maintenance of distinct populations of T helper type 1 (T(H)1)-lineage cells in vivo and found that effector T(H)1 cells, defined by their secretion of interferon-gamma (IFN-gamma), are short-lived and do not efficiently develop into long-term memory T(H)1 cells. In contrast, a population of activated T(H)1-lineage cells that did not secrete IFN-gamma after primary antigenic stimulation persisted for several months in vivo and developed the capacity to secrete IFN-gamma upon subsequent stimulation. These data suggest that a linear differentiation pathway, as defined by the transition from IFN-gamma-producing to resting memory cells, is relatively limited in vivo and support a revised model for T(H)1 memory differentiation.

CpG oligodeoxynucleotides (ODN) have potent effects on innate and adaptive cellular immune responses. In this report, the ability of CpG ODN to confer long-term immunity and protection when used as a vaccine adjuvant with a clinical grade of leishmanial antigen, autoclaved Leishmania major (ALM), or a recombinant leishmanial protein was studied. In two different mouse models of L. major infection, vaccination with ALM plus CpG ODN was able to control infection and markedly reduce lesion development in susceptible BALB/c and resistant C57BL/6 (B6) mice, respectively, up to 12 wk after immunization. Moreover, B6 mice immunized with ALM plus CpG ODNs were still protected against infectious challenge even 6 mo after vaccination. In terms of immune correlates of protection, ALM plus CpG ODN-vaccinated mice displayed L. major-specific T helper cell 1 and CD8+ responses. In addition, complete protection was markedly abrogated in mice depleted of CD8+ T cells at the time of vaccination. Similarly, mice vaccinated with a recombinant leishmanial protein plus CpG ODN also had long-term protection that was dependent on CD8+ T cells in vivo. Together, these data demonstrate that CpG ODN, when used as a vaccine adjuvant with either a recombinant protein or heat-killed leishmanial antigen, can induce long-term protection against an intracellular infection in a CD8-dependent manner.