Search

ObjectiveEnthesitis is a key pathological and clinical feature of psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in children and adults. Enthesitis is typically assessed clinically using several validated enthesitis scoring systems that have been used in clinical trials. Enthesitis treatment response has been reported as change in the total enthesitis score or the proportion of patients who achieved complete resolution. The majority of trials in PsA did not require patients to have enthesitis at study entry since enthesitis was evaluated only as a secondary outcome. Despite the inherent limitations of the clinical assessment of enthesitis, imaging of the entheses using ultrasound or magnetic resonance imaging has rarely been used in clinical trials to assess response to treatment of enthesitis. This systematic review summarizes existing evidence regarding pharmaceutical and nonpharmaceutical interventions for enthesitis in patients with PsA to facilitate an evidence-based update of the Group for Research and Assessment in Psoriasis and Psoriatic Arthritis (GRAPPA) treatment recommendations for PsA.MethodsWe performed a systematic literature review to identify 41 randomized clinical trials that reported enthesitis treatment response in patients with PsA. For each intervention, the response effect size was summarized and the quality of evidence was graded. Recommendations were then formulated for the various pharmacological and nonpharmacological therapies.ResultsWe included 41 randomized clinical trials in our review and graded each intervention.ConclusionSeveral classes of systemic conventional and advanced therapies and local measures were recommended for active enthesitis in patients with PsA.

Summary Background Belimumab is approved for the treatment of active systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). Although clinical trials showed a favourable benefit–risk profile, numerical differences in the incidence of mortality and adverse events of special interest (AESIs) have been reported. We assessed the frequency of these events in patients with SLE receiving belimumab or placebo plus standard therapy. Methods BASE was a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled, phase 4 trial done in 33 countries. Adults with active SLE were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive intravenous belimumab (10 mg/kg) or placebo, plus standard therapy, for 48 weeks. The primary endpoints were incidences of all-cause mortality and AESIs during the on-treatment period (first-to-last study drug dose + 28 days). Safety analyses were done in the as-treated population (patients grouped by actual treatment received >50% of the time). This study was registered with ClinicalTrials.gov ( NCT01705977 ). Findings Between Nov 27, 2012, and July 28, 2017, we randomly assigned 4018 patients. The as-treated population included 2002 patients in the belimumab group versus 2001 in the placebo group. Ten (0·50%) patients in the belimumab group died versus eight (0·40%) in the placebo group (difference 0·10%, 95% CI −0·31 to 0·51). Incidences were similar in the belimumab and placebo groups for serious infections (75 [3·75%] of 2002 vs 82 [4·10%] of 2001; difference −0·35%, 95% CI −1·55 to 0·85), opportunistic infections and other infections of interest (36 [1·80%] vs 50 [2·50%]; −0·70%, −1·60 to 0·20), non-melanoma skin cancers (4 [0·20%] vs 3 [0·15%]; 0·05%, −0·21 to 0·31) and other malignancies (5 [0·25%] vs 5 [0·25%]; 0·00%, −0·31 to 0·31). A higher proportion of patients in the belimumab group than in the placebo group had infusion and hypersensitivity reactions (8 [0·40%] vs 2 [0·10%]; 0·30%, −0·01 to 0·61), serious depression (7 [0·35%] vs 1 [0·05%]; 0·30%, 0·02 to 0·58), treatment-emergent suicidality (28 [1·42%] of 1972 patients vs 23 [1·16%] of 1986; 0·26%, −0·44 to 0·96), and sponsor-adjudicated serious suicide or self-injury (15 [0·75%] of 1972 patients vs 5 [0·25%] of 1986; post hoc difference 0·50%, 0·06 to 0·94). Interpretation In line with previously published data, incidences of all-cause mortality and AESIs were similar in patients given belimumab and placebo, except for serious infusion or hypersensitivity reactions, serious depression, treatment-emergent suicidality, and sponsor-adjudicated serious suicide or self-injury events. Funding GSK.

Doenças sistêmicas podem apresentar alterações enteseais, estruturais ou inflamatórias, e, portanto, podemos necessitar avaliar estas hipóteses diagnósticas na investigação de uma entesopatia. Entre estas patologias, destacam-se as de origem metabólica, como o hipoparatireoidismo idiopático e o hiperparatireoidismo, associado à hipofosfatasia ou à insuficiência renal crônica, e a ocronose, nos casos com acometimento principalmente axial, e a diabetes mellitus, a acromegalia e a hipercolesterolemia familiar, em que predominam os quadros periféricos. Além deste grupo, é interessante incluir a doença celíaca nos casos de entesopatia e sintomas gastrointestinais, e incluir algumas infecções, como tuberculose, em casos mais localizados e agressivos. Também há relatos de associação de algumas drogas, em especial os retinoides, a alterações enteseais, principalmente a entesopatias axiais. Desta forma, a avaliação global do paciente, incluindo sintomas sistêmicos, alterações metabólicas, comorbidades existentes e medicações em uso, é muito importante durante a investigação de uma entesopatia. Unitermos: Entesopatia. Entesite. Doenças sistêmicas. Diagnóstico diferencial.

ObjectivesTo evaluate risk factors associated with unfavourable outcomes: emergency care, hospitalisation, admission to intensive care unit (ICU), mechanical ventilation and death in patients with immune-mediated rheumatic disease (IMRD) and COVID-19.MethodsAnalysis of the first 8 weeks of observational multicentre prospective cohort study (ReumaCoV Brasil register). Patients with IMRD and COVID-19 according to the Ministry of Health criteria were classified as eligible for the study.Results334 participants were enrolled, a majority of them women, with a median age of 45 years; systemic lupus erythematosus (32.9%) was the most frequent IMRD. Emergency care was required in 160 patients, 33.0% were hospitalised, 15.0% were admitted to the ICU and 10.5% underwent mechanical ventilation; 28 patients (8.4%) died. In the multivariate adjustment model for emergency care, diabetes (prevalence ratio, PR 1.38; 95% CI 1.11 to 1.73; p=0.004), kidney disease (PR 1.36; 95% CI 1.05 to 1.77; p=0.020), oral glucocorticoids (GC) (PR 1.49; 95% CI 1.21 to 1.85; p50 years (PR 1.89; 95% CI 1.26 to 2.85; p=0.002), no use of tumour necrosis factor inhibitor (TNFi) (PR 2.51;95% CI 1.16 to 5.45; p=0.004) and methylprednisolone pulse therapy (PR 2.50; 95% CI 1.59 to 3.92; pConclusionsAge >50 years and immunosuppression with GC and cyclophosphamide were associated with unfavourable outcomes of COVID-19. Treatment with TNFi may have been protective, perhaps leading to the COVID-19 inflammatory process.

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a multiorgan autoimmune disease which can present from classical to atypical forms. We discuss the case of a young lady of 29 years-old recently diagnosed with SLE that manifested parotitis and pancreatitis.

Spondyloarthritis presents clinical features, laboratory findings, and similar images, but their clinical manifestations reveal great heterogeneity in patients HLA-B*27 positive and negative. This study compared the frequencies of the clinical manifestations in the presence and absence of HLA-B*27. From the 156 patients with clinical suspicion of spondyloarthritis, 73 had a diagnosis of spondyloarthritis confirmed. The HLA-B*27 gene was identified by polymerase chain-reaction sequence-specific oligonucleotide probe (PCR-SSOP). The Student t test was used to calculate the values of mean and the Fisher's exact test was used to compare proportions. The values of odds ratio (OR) and confidence interval (CI) at 95% were also calculated (p