Search

Background: Oestrogen receptor positive (ER+) breast cancer patients can acquire endocrine resistance and 10-20% tumours have lost ER at relapse. While growth factor pathway hyperactivity and ER promoter methylation contribute to de novo ER negativity, ER loss in acquired resistance is largely unexplored. We have recently developed 11 lines from MCF7, T47D, BT474 & MDAMB361 cells to model acquired resistance emerging with prolonged (3 year) endocrine treatment both in ER+/HER2- and ER+/HER2+ disease. Here we establish prevalence of acquired ER loss in the panel, determine any association with aggressiveness, and explore ER loss mechanisms in acquired endocrine resistance. Methods: Authenticated acquired resistant models derived from endocrine responsive lines cultured for 3 years with 10-7M tamoxifen (TamR), 10-7M fulvestrant (FasR) or oestrogen deprivation (5% charcoal-stripped foetal calf serum SFCSR) were profiled for ER & PR by PCR, immunocytochemistry and Western blotting (+/- 1-2wk antihormone withdrawal), for 2nd-line endocrine responsiveness and for migration using Boyden chamber assays vs. time-matched controls. Src kinase, EGFR, HER2, MAPK & AKT activity were examined and whether their respective inhibition using saracatinib or gefitinib (1μM), trastuzumab (100nM), U0126 or LY294002 (5μM) for 1wk restored ER. ESR1 promoter methylation was examined by bisulfite modification & MethyLight PCR. Results: Substantial ER mRNA & protein loss occurred in 7/11 long-term acquired endocrine resistant lines. This was irreversible by antihormone withdrawal and paralleled by complete PR loss and endocrine growth-insensitivity. While seen in all fulvestrant resistant lines, ER loss was less frequent with tamoxifen (in MCF7TamR & MDATamR) and only seen in oestrogen deprived resistant T47DSFCSR cells. Increased migration accompanied acquired ER loss in ER+/HER2- derived MCF7TamR, MCF7FasR & T47DSFCSR cells and was saracatinib-sensitive. Src and further growth factor pathway activity increased in several acquired resistant models, and ER loss associated with increased EGFR/HER2 in the MCF7- & MDA-derived cells and with increased MAPK activity in all lines. Weak ER recovery was seen in antioestrogen resistant models treated with saracatinib (MDATamR, MCF7FasR), gefitinib (MDATamR, BT474FasR, MCF7FasR/TamR) or trastuzumab (MCF7TamR). ESR1 DNA methylation was only prominent in MDATamR and MCF7TamR cells. No inhibitor restored ER in the T47D-derived cells, including T47DSFCSR which also lacked ESR1 methylation. Conclusions: Although ER loss is very prominent in this acquired resistant cell panel, it demonstrates there is capacity of prolonged antihormones, chiefly antioestrogens, to promote receptor loss independent of initial HER2 status. Acquired ER loss clinically would be expected to confer endocrine insensitivity and poorer prognosis given the panel findings. Where ER loss emerged with antioestrogens there was some mechanistic-overlap with de novo ER negativity, including ER promoter methylation for acquired tamoxifen resistance. Our future studies will use the panel to address if targeting these mechanisms can be optimized for ER recovery or if further mechanisms also drive ER loss in acquired resistance, notably for prolonged oestrogen deprivation. Citation Format: Julia M Gee, Mei Yee Meng, Richard A McClelland, Huw J Mottram, Susan R Kyme, Pauline Finlay, Lindy Goddard, Carol M Dutkowski, Denise Barrow, Walther Parson, Heidi Fiegl. A new cell panel to study oestrogen receptor loss in acquired endocrine resistant breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the Thirty-Seventh Annual CTRC-AACR San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium: 2014 Dec 9-13; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(9 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-05-19.

The tetrahydroazepinone pharmacophore is a component of many interesting compounds, including several marine natural products, with anti-cancer properties. The synthesis and biological evaluation of a novel series of pyrroloazepinone and indoloazepinone oximes is reported. These compounds showed promising growth inhibition activity against four human cancer cell lines but did not significantly inhibit the cell cycle regulator cyclin dependent kinase 2. The most active compounds in this series displayed improved anti-proliferative activity over the related synthetic indoloazepine kenpaullone. The structure activity relationships exhibited by the azepinone pharmacophore suggests several novel lead compounds for anti-cancer drug discovery.

The potent inhibitory activity of novel 2-benzyltetralone and 2-benzylidenetetralone derivatives vs liver microsomal retinoic acid metabolizing enzymes and a MCF-7 CYP26A1 cell assay is described. In the liver microsomal assay, the 2-biphenylmethyl-6-hydroxytetralone derivatives 16a and 16b were found to be potent inhibitors (IC50 = 0.5 and 0.8 microM) compared with the broad spectrum P450 inhibitor ketoconazole and the retinoid mimetic R115866 (IC50 = 18.0 and 9.0 microM, respectively). In the MCF-7 CYP26A1 cell assay, the 2-(4-hydroxybenzyl)-6-methoxytetralone 5 and unsaturated benzylidene precursor 6 were found to be the most potent (IC50 = 7 and 5 microM, respectively), which was comparable with liarozole (7 microM) but considerably less active than R115866 (IC50 = 5 nM). With a CYP26A1 homology model, the tetralones were shown to be positioned in a hydrophobic tunnel with additional interactions, e.g., transition metal coordination and hydrogen-bonding interactions with GLY300, observed for the potent 4-hydroxyphenyl substituted inhibitors.

Although many estrogen receptor-positive breast cancers initially respond to antihormones, responses are commonly incomplete with resistance ultimately emerging. Delineation of signaling mechanisms underlying these phenomena would allow development of therapies to improve antihormone response and compromise resistance. This in vitro investigation in MCF-7 breast cancer cells examines whether epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signaling limits antiproliferative and proapoptotic activity of antihormones and ultimately supports development of resistance. It addresses whether the anti-EGFR agent gefitinib (ZD1839/Iressa; TKI: 1 mum) combined with the antihormones 4-hydroxytamoxifen (TAM: 0.1 mum) or fulvestrant (Faslodex; 0.1 mum) enhances growth inhibition and prevents resistance. TAM significantly suppressed MCF-7 growth over wk 2-5, reducing proliferation detected by immunocytochemistry and fluorescence-activated cell sorter cell cycle analysis. A modest apoptotic increase was observed by fluorescence-activated cell sorter and fluorescence microscopy, with incomplete bcl-2 suppression. EGFR induction occurred during TAM response, as measured by immunocytochemistry and Western blotting, with EGFR-positive, highly proliferative resistant growth subsequently emerging. Although TKI alone was ineffective on growth, TAM plus TKI cotreatment exhibited superior antigrowth activity vs. TAM, with no viable cells by wk 12. Cotreatment was more effective in inhibiting proliferation, promoting apoptosis, and eliminating bcl-2. Cotreatment blocked EGFR induction, markedly depleted ERK1/2 MAPK and protein kinase B phosphorylation, and prevented emergence of EGFR-positive resistance. Faslodex plus TKI cotreatment was also a superior antitumor strategy. Thus, increased EGFR evolves during treatment with antihormones, limiting their efficacy and promoting resistance. Gefitinib addition to antihormonal therapy could prove more effective in treating estrogen receptor-positive breast cancer and may combat development of resistance.

There is an increasing body of evidence demonstrating that growth factor networks are highly interactive with oestrogen receptor (ER) signalling in the control of breast cancer growth. As such, tumour responses to anti- hormones are likely to be a composite of the ER and growth factor inhibitory activity of these agents. The current article examines the modulation of growth factor networks during endocrine response, and presents in vitro and clinical evidence that epidermal growth factor receptor signalling, maintained in either an ER-dependent or -independent manner, is critical to anti- hormonal-resistant breast cancer cell growth. The considerable potential of the epidermal growth factor receptor-selective tyrosine kinase inhibitor, ZD 1839 (Iressa; AstraZeneca) to efficiently treat, and perhaps even prevent, endocrine-resistant breast cancer is highlighted.

An immunocytochemical assay for the p53-regulated protein product of the WAF1/Cip1 gene, p21WAF1 (p21), was developed and applied to archival primary breast tumour material from 91 patients whose subsequent recurrent disease was treated with assessable courses of endocrine therapy. Nuclear localization of p21 protein was observed in 76 (82·4 per cent) cases. Status cut-offs were established and 29 (31·9 per cent) were deemed negative, 39 (42·9 per cent) weakly positive, and 23 (25·3 per cent) strongly positive. p21 status was inversely correlated with p53 protein (p = 0·047) but did not relate to oestrogen receptor (ER) status, response to endocrine therapy, or time to further disease progression (TTP). Highly p21-positive patients had a significantly improved overall survival time (p = 0·020). Co-assessment of p21 and p53 subgroups revealed p21 + /p53 − patients to have good survival characteristics, whilst p21 − /p53+ patients did poorly (p = 0·008). The p21 − /p53− patients overall did intermediately well, but Ki67-defined cellular proliferation analysis of these revealed two subclasses: those with high proliferation and poor survival times resembling the p21 − /p53+ phenotype, and those with less proliferative tumours with good survival, similar to the p21 + /p53− group. The significance of these results is discussed in the light of recent research concerning the role of p21 and p53 in breast cancer aetiology.

The EMS1 and CCND1 genes at chromosome 11q13 are amplified in about 15% of primary breast cancers but appear to confer different phenotypes in ER positive and ER negative tumours. Since there are no published data on EMS1 expression in large series of breast cancers we examined the relationship of EMS1 expression with EMS1 gene copy number and expression of mRNAs for cyclin D1 and ER. In a subset of 129 patients, where matched tumour RNA and DNA was available, EMS1 mRNA overexpression was associated predominantly with gene amplification (P = 0.0061), whereas cyclin D1 mRNA overexpression was not (P = 0.3142). In a more extensive series of 351 breast cancers, there was no correlation between cyclin D1 and EMS1 expression in the EMS1 and cyclin D1 overexpressors (P = 0.3503). Although an association between EMS1 mRNA expression and ER positivity was evident (P = 0.0232), when the samples were divided into quartiles of EMS1 or cyclin D1 mRNA expression, the increase in the proportion of ER positive tumours in the ascending EMS1 mRNA quartiles was not statistically significant (P = 0.0951). In marked contrast there was a significant stepwise increase in ER positivity in ascending quartiles of cyclin D1 mRNA (P = 0.030). A potential explanation for this difference was provided by the observation that in ER positive breast cancer cells oestradiol treatment resulted in increased cyclin D1 gene expression but was without effect on EMS1. The relationship between EMS1 expression and clinical outcome was examined in a subset of 234 patients with median follow-up of 74 months. High EMS1 expression was associated with age > 50 years (P = 0.0001), postmenopausal status (P = 0.0008), lymph node negativity (P = 0.019) and an apparent trend for worse prognosis in the ER negative subgroup. These data demonstrate that overexpression of EMS1 mRNA is largely due to EMS1 gene amplification, is independent of cyclin D1 and ER expression and, in contrast to cyclin D1, is not regulated by oestrogen. Independent overexpression of these genes may confer different phenotypes and disease outcomes in breast cancer as has been inferred from recent studies of EMS1 and CCND1 gene amplification.

The HER2 transmembrane receptor is a well-characterised predictive marker for trastuzumab benefit and may be associated with decreased benefit from endocrine therapy use. Despite the clinical effectiveness of anti-HER2 agents in such cases, resistance represents a significant limiting factor. Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) plays an important role in HER2 signalling, mediating downstream Akt activation in addition to HER2 cross talk with other growth factor receptors. In this study, we investigated the therapeutic potential of FAK in oestrogen receptor-positive (ER+)/HER2+ breast cancer using the novel FAK-specific inhibitor PF4554878 (‘PF878’). The activation of the FAK/HER2 signalling pathway was assessed in ER+/HER2− (MCF7 and T47D) and ER+/HER2+ (BT-474 and MDAMB361) breast cancer cells in the presence or absence of PF878 and PF878±trastuzumab. The effects of PF878 on cell growth as a monotherapy and in combination with trastuzumab were assessed using 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide and Coulter counting with isobologram analysis to determine synergy/additive effects. FAK activation (at Y861 but not at Y397) was highest in ER+/HER2+ cells, which also demonstrated the greatest sensitivity to PF878. As a monotherapy, PF878 prevented heregulin-induced MDA361 cell migration, but had no significant effect on cell growth. The treatment of ER+/HER2+ cells with PF878 and trastuzumab in combination resulted in the synergistic inhibition of cell proliferation. Underlying this was an abrogation of Akt activity and increased poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase cleavage, effects that were greatest in trastuzumab-refractory MDA361 cells. Collectively, these data support a role for FAK in ER+/HER2+ breast cancer, where its targeting has the potential to improve trastuzumab response. This is particularly important in the context of ER+/HER2+, trastuzumab-refractory disease, where FAK inhibition may present an important strategy to restore trastuzumab sensitivity.

Effects of the pure antiestrogen ICI182780 and tamoxifen on ER-protein, ER-mRNA, and estrogen-regulated mRNA expression were analysed using matched pretreatment core-cut biopsies and post-treatment mastectomy samples from 43 ER positive human breast cancers. Sixteen controls received either no preoperative treatment (n = 9) (7 days) or placebo (n = 7) (median 21 days) prior to primary surgery. Nineteen patients received ICI182780 6 mg/day (n = 10) or 18 mg/day (n = 9) for 7 days. Eight patients were given preoperative tamoxifen (4 x 40 mg-day 1, 20 mg/day thereafter, median 21 days). ER-protein expression was assessed on pre and post treatment samples by immunocytochemistry. ER, pS2, pLIV1, and actin-mRNA expression was determined by northern analysis on post-treatment samples only. ER-mRNA levels were similar to controls following ICI182780 or tamoxifen treatment. However ER-protein levels were significantly suppressed by ICI182780, particularly at the higher dosage (p = 0.0013). Tamoxifen had no significant effect on ER-protein levels. The ER-mRNA and ER-protein contents of control tumors were linearly related (Spearman r = 0.719, p = 0.006). A similar relationship between pretreatment protein and post ICI182780 treatment mRNA levels was observed (r = 0.652, p = 0.005). However, comparison of post ICI182780 treatment protein and mRNA results shows a loss of linearity through a reduction in protein without concurrent loss of mRNA (r = 0.28, p = 0.257). pS2 mRNA hybridization was lower in ICI182780 treated samples than controls (Mann-Whitney p = 0.035) but was unaffected by tamoxifen. pLIV1 mRNA hybridization was uninfluenced by either treatment. Short term exposure of breast tumors to ICI182780 appears to produce a greater inhibition of estrogen-induced transcriptional events than tamoxifen. These effects appear to occur without a concurrent reduction in ER mRNA levels.

Immunocytochemical studies examining the Ki-67 proliferation marker in paraffin-embedded material have recently been made possible by the availability of several antibodies, notably MIB-1, which are readily applicable to microwaved sections. Using breast cancer material, the present study examines correlations shown by these new paraffin assays and also by PCNA (proliferating cell nuclear antigen), an existing marker of proliferation, with the established Ki-67 cryosection assay. Paraffin sections were microwaved prior to incubation with Ki-67 or MIB-1 antibodies. Signal detection was carried out with a biotinylated secondary antibody, peroxidase-conjugated streptavidin, and DAB/H2O2 chromogen. The results suggest that caution is required when studying proliferation in paraffin-embedded breast cancers by immunostaining using Ki-67 antibodies. Nuclear staining in wax sections (Ki-Par, MIB-1, PCNA) greatly exceeded that in cryosections (Ki-Froz) and thus correlations were notably absent between Ki-Par or PCNA immunostaining and the routine Ki-Froz assay. Immunostaining with MIB-1 or PCNA may, however, be useful to assess proliferation if cut-offs are applied to eliminate weak immunostaining associated with wax sections. Thus, an approximately linear relationship was seen between MIB-1/Ki-Froz, which was improved if only moderately or moderately/strongly MIB-1-positive cells were scored. Similarly, a significant correlation was also revealed between PCNA/Ki-Froz if such a cut-off was applied.

The protein product of the bcl-2 gene is thought to be involved in inhibition of apoptosis; it may therefore be important in the modulation of hormonal/anti-hormonal responsiveness exhibited by tumours. This study immunocytochemically investigates (i) relationships between bcl-2 protein expression in primary breast cancers and other markers of prognostic and therapeutic value and (ii) associations of the bcl-2 protein with breast cancer responsiveness to endocrine therapy. The bcl-2 protein was found within the tumour epithelial cell cytoplasm of 32/46 breast cancer specimens; inter-patient staining was heterogeneous. Immunostaining for steroid hormone receptors was strongly associated with that for the bcl-2 protein, and it is thus possible that this protein, like progesterone receptor, is under oestrogen regulation via oestrogen receptor. The protein was inversely related to 2 markers of endocrine insensitivity, epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and c-erbB-2 oncoprotein, while no associations were observed with either transforming growth factor (TGF)-alpha or Ki-67 proliferative status. A highly significant relationship was observed between response to endocrine therapy and the presence of bcl-2 protein. Indeed, bcl-2 immunostaining proved to be a more accurate predictor of response than oestrogen receptor status. Patients with elevated bcl-2 immunostaining (particularly those who co-expressed high oestrogen receptor levels) appeared to derive the greatest benefit from endocrine therapy. Our results are paradoxical since it was expected that the bcl-2 protein would counteract the tumour inhibitory effects of endocrine therapies as it is thought to prevent programmed cell death.

In the present study, we have taken the novel approach of using an in vitro model representative of tamoxifen-withdrawal subsequent to clinical relapse to achieve a greater understanding of the mechanisms that serve to maintain the resistant-cell phenotype, independent of any agonistic impact of tamoxifen, to identify potential novel therapeutic approaches for this disease state. Following tamoxifen withdrawal, tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 cells conserved both drug resistance and an increased basal rate of proliferation in an oestrogen deprived environment, despite reduced epidermal growth-factor receptor expression and reduced sensitivity to gefitinib challenge. Although tamoxifen-withdrawn cells retained ER expression, a sub-set of ER-responsive genes, including pS2 and progesterone receptor (PgR), were down-regulated by promoter DNA methylation, as confirmed by clonal bisulphite sequencing experiments. Following promoter demethylation with 5-Azacytidine (5-Aza), the co-addition of oestradiol (E2) restored gene expression in these cells. In addition, 5-Aza/E2 co-treatment induced a significant anti-proliferative effect in the tamoxifen-withdrawn cells, in-contrast to either agent used alone. Microarray analysis was undertaken to identify genes specifically up regulated by this co-treatment. Several anti-proliferative gene candidates were identified and their promoters were confirmed as more heavily methylated in the tamoxifen resistant vs sensitive cells. One such gene candidate, growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), was carried forward for functional analysis. The addition of 5-Aza/E2 was sufficient to de-methylate and activate GDF15 expression in the tamoxifen resistant cell-lines, whilst in parallel, treatment with recombinant GDF15 protein decreased cell survival. These data provide evidence to support a novel concept that long-term tamoxifen exposure induces epigenetic silencing of a cohort of oestrogen-responsive genes whose function is associated with negative proliferation control. Furthermore, reactivation of such genes using epigenetic drugs could provide a potential therapeutic avenue for the management of tamoxifen-resistant breast cancer.

Introduction We have previously reported that induction of epidermal growth factor receptor and ErbB2 in response to antihormonal agents may provide an early mechanism to allow breast cancer cells to evade the growth-inhibitory action of such therapies and ultimately drive resistant cell growth. More recently, the other two members of the ErbB receptor family, ErbB3 and ErbB4, have been implicated in antihormone resistance in breast cancer. In the present study, we have investigated whether induction of ErbB3 and/or ErbB4 may provide an alternative resistance mechanism to antihormonal action in a panel of four oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive breast cancer cell lines. Methods MCF-7, T47D, BT474 and MDAMB361 cell lines were exposed to fulvestrant (100 nM) for seven days, and effects on ErbB3/4 expression and signalling, as well as on cell growth, were assessed. Effects of heregulin β1 (HRGβ1) were also examined in the absence and presence of fulvestrant to determine the impact of ER blockade on the capacity of this ErbB3/4 ligand to promote signalling and cell proliferation. Results Fulvestrant potently reduced ER expression and transcriptional activity and significantly inhibited growth in MCF-7, T47D, BT474 and MDAMB361 cells. However, alongside this inhibitory activity, fulvestrant also consistently induced protein expression and activity of ErbB3 in MCF-7 and T47D cells and ErbB4 in BT474 and MDAMB361 cell lines. Consequently, fulvestrant treatment sensitised all cell lines to the actions of the ErbB3/4 ligand HRGβ1 with enhanced ErbB3/4-driven signalling activity, reexpression of cyclin D1 and significant increases in cell proliferation being observed when compared to untreated cells. Indeed, in T47D and MDAMB361 HRGβ1 was converted from a ligand having negligible or suppressive growth activity into one that potently promoted cell proliferation. Consequently, fulvestrant-mediated growth inhibition was completely overridden by HRGβ1 in all four cell lines. Conclusions These findings suggest that although antihormones such as fulvestrant may have potent acute growth-inhibitory activity in ER-positive breast cancer cells, their ability to induce and sensitise cells to growth factors may serve to reduce and ultimately limit their inhibitory activity.

Using MCF7 breast cancer cells, it has been shown that antihormones promote expression/activity of oestrogen-repressed tyrosine kinases, notably EGFR, HER2 and Src. These inductive events confer responsiveness to targeted inhibitors (e.g., gefitinib, trastuzumab, saracatinib). We observed that these antihormone-induced phenomena are common to ER+HER2– and ER+HER2+ breast cancer models in vitro, where targeting of EGFR, HER2 or Src alongside antihormone improves antitumour response and delays/prevents endocrine resistance. Such targeted inhibitors also subvert acquired endocrine resistant cells which retain increased EGFR, HER2 and Src (e.g., TAMR and FASR models derived after 6–12 months of tamoxifen or Faslodex treatment). Thus, antihormone-induced tyrosine kinases comprise “compensatory signalling” crucial in limiting maximal initial antihormone response and subsequently driving acquired resistance in vitro. However, despite such convincing preclinical findings from our group and others, clinical trials examining equivalent antigrowth factor strategies have proved relatively disappointing. Our new studies deciphering underlying causes reveal that further antihormone-promoted events could be pivotal in vivo. Firstly, Faslodex induces HER3 and HER4 which sensitise ER+ cells to heregulin, a paracrine growth factor that overcomes endocrine response and diminishes antitumour effect of agents targeting EGFR, HER2 or Src alongside antihormone. Secondly, extended antihormone exposure (experienced by ER+ cells prior to adjuvant clinical relapse) can “reprogramme” the compensatory kinase profile in vitro, hindering candidate antigrowth factor targeting of endocrine resistance. Faslodex resistant cells maintained with this antihormone for 3 years in vitro lose EGFR/HER2 dependency, gaining alternative mitogenic/invasion kinases. Deciphering these previously unrecognised antihormone-induced events could provide superior treatments to control endocrine relapse in the clinic.

The heterogeneity of oestrogen receptor (ER) expression has been examined in both normal and malignant breast tissue using an immunohistochemical assay. In both instances the ER status and cellular ER negativity were influenced by the patients' menopausal status, with tissues removed from premenopausal women being more often ER-negative, and when ER-positive, containing a high proportion of apparently ER-negative cells. Since the breast is normally regarded as hormone sensitive and since tumour cell ER negativity is apparently under a degree of hormonal regulation, our results suggest that the proportion of breast cancer cells that are ER-negative should be viewed with a degree of caution.

Antihormones are of substantial benefit in treating oestrogen receptor-α positive (ER+) breast cancer. However, their anti-tumour effect is limited by emergence of resistance. Our in vitro studies are highlighting a new underlying concept: that antihormones are not passive bystanders but alongside growth inhibitory effects promote adverse compensatory mechanisms within tumour cells. These mechanisms involve drug-induction of signalling elements normally suppressed by oestrogen (E2)-occupied E R˜ While best exemplified by the tyrosine kinases epidermal growth factor receptor and HER2, microarrays reveal the true diversity of the induced signalling kinases, where their potential to promote resistance is exacerbated under paracrine conditions. Such drug-induced events permit initial ER+ breast cancer cell survival, allow development and maintenance of resistance, and also promote gain of invasiveness under conditions of poor intercellular contact. In addition, prolonged antihormonal exposure is associated with epigenetic silencing of classical E2-induced tumour suppressors, an event which further contributes to resistance. Based on proof of principle experiments targeting induced signalling events alongside antihormones or restoring E2-induced suppressor genes through DNA methylation inhibitor-containing strategies, it is our belief that continued deciphering of these mechanisms will reveal improved treatments for breast cancer.

Qualitative and semiquantitative assessments of oestrogen receptor and progesterone receptor positivity determined on previously immunocytochemically stained slides were performed by eight independent assessors. Concordance beween assessments of steroid receptor status was good ( 24 25 , 96%). Interassessor variations in estimates of positive immunostaining levels were high, varying by between 10 and 75% for individual slides. In 2 cases estimates for the same section ranged between 15% nuclei positive and 90% nuclei positive. Wide variations were also recorded for slides stained for progesterone receptors. Results using an assessment procedure combining staining intensity and percentage positivity estimates were also subject to marked discordance. A computerised image analysis system, also used to assess slides gave results similar to the mean manually determined percentage positivity values. It is suggested that quality control of steroid receptor immunocytochemical quantification be considered and that automated image analysis may represent an accurate and valid means of achieving this.

Aberrant epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) signalling, a key feature of a variety of human malignancies, can drive a range of mechanisms underlying tumour growth and progression, including increased cell proliferation, angiogenesis, metastasis and decreased apoptosis. Anti-EGFR therapies, as monotherapies and in combination with chemotherapy, have proved effective in inhibiting these processes both in the clinical and in the preclinical settings. However, only a small cohort of patients have derived significant benefit from this therapy, with both de novo and acquired resistance to these agents evident in a number of recent studies. If we are to improve the effectiveness of such targeted therapies, then there is an urgent need to understand the resistance mechanisms. Here, we describe both non-genomic and genomic mechanisms of resistance to the selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor gefitinib (IRESSA), which we have identified initially in an EGFR-positive tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cell line, but more recently in other EGFR-positive cancer types. Importantly, we show that gefitinib, in common with anti-hormonal agents, is not a passive bystander in the cellular response to drug treatment, but plays an active role in promoting signalling pathways that serve to limit its anti-tumour activity and maintain the cellular cohort from which acquired resistance can ultimately evolve. These findings indicate that inductive signalling is an important determinant of response to EGFR-targeted therapies and deciphering such pathways may provide us with the opportunity to design more effective strategies to combat resistance mechanisms and improve response to initial therapy.

Breast cancer inhibition by antihormones is rarely complete, and our studies using responsive models reveal the remarkable flexibility of breast cancer cells in recruiting alternative signalling to limit maximal anti-tumour effects of oestrogen receptor α (ER) blockade. The recruited mechanism involves antihormone-induced expression of oestrogen-repressed signalling genes. For example, epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) is induced by antioestrogens and maintains residual kinase and ER phosphorylation, cell survival genes, and thereby allows incomplete antihormone response and emergence of resistance. Microarrays are revealing the breadth of antihormone-induced genes that may attenuate growth inhibition, including NFκB, Bag1, 14-3-3ζ and tyrosine kinases, such as HER2 and Lyn. Three concepts are emerging: first, some genes are induced exclusively by antioestrogens, while others extend to oestrogen deprivation; secondly, some are transiently induced, while others persist into resistance; finally, some confer additional adverse features when tumour cells are in an appropriate context. Among the latter is CD59 whose antioestrogen induction may permit evasion of immune surveillance in vivo. Also, induction of pro-invasive genes (including NFκB, RhoE and δ-catenin) may underlie our findings that antioestrogens can markedly stimulate migratory behaviour when tumour intercellular contacts are compromised. Based on our promising studies selectively inhibiting EGFR (gefitinib), NFκB (parthenolide) or CD59 (neutralising antibody) together with antioestrogens, we propose that co-targeting strategies could markedly improve anti-tumour activity (notably enhancing cell kill) during the antihormone-responsive phase. Furthermore, subverting those induced signalling genes that are retained into resistance (e.g. EGFR, NFκB, HER2) may prove valuable in this state. Alongside future deciphering and targeting of genes underlying antioestrogen-promoted invasiveness, embracing of intelligent combination strategies could significantly extend patient survival.

Our previous investigations using cell models of tamoxifen resistance have shown that the acquisition of an endocrine-insensitive state is accompanied by an invasive in vitro phenotype. In this study, we wished to determine whether this was specifically related to partial oestrogen receptor agonists or whether similar phenomena arise with the newer ‘pure’ anti-oestrogens, exemplified by fulvestrant. Our data demonstrate that the development of fulvestrant resistance in two breast cancer cell lines, MCF7 and T47D, is accompanied by an augmented migratory and invasive phenotype in vitro and overexpression of the HGF/SF receptor, c-Met. Importantly, upregulated c-Met expression in these cells facilitates their stimulation by HGF/SF-secreting stromal fibroblasts, leading to the activation of Src, Akt and ERK1/2 and a profound enhancement of their aggressive phenotype in vitro. These effects could be specifically attributable to activation of the c-Met receptor since the inclusion of neutralising antibodies to c-Met, or siRNA-mediated knockdown of c-Met expression, suppressed both invasion and migration stimulated by either exogenous HGF/SF, fibroblast-conditioned medium or following co-culture with fibroblast cells. Together, these in vitro data suggest that the development of fulvestrant resistance in vivo may confer a metastatic advantage to the cells by allowing their migratory and invasive behaviour to be augmented by surrounding stromal cells.

We have previously demonstrated that oestrogen receptor alpha (ERalpha) modulates epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK) signalling efficiency in a tamoxifen-resistant MCF-7 breast cancer cell line (Tam-R). In the present study we have investigated whether this cross-talk between EGFR/MAPK and ERalpha signalling pathways is bidirectional by examining the effects of EGFR/MAPK activity on ER functionality in the same cell line. Elevated expression levels of phosphorylated serine 118 (S118) ERalpha were observed in the Tam-R compared to the parental wild type MCF-7 cell line (WT-MCF-7) under basal growth conditions. Phosphorylation of ERalpha at S118 was regulated by the EGFR/MAPK pathway in Tam-R cells being increased in response to amphiregulin (AR) and inhibited by the selective EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitor, gefitinib and the MEK1/2 inhibitor, PD184352. Recruitment of the co-activators p68 RNA helicase and SRC1 to ERalpha, oestrogen response element (ERE) activity and Tam-R cell growth were similarly EGFR/MAPK-regulated. Chromatin immunoprecipitation (ChIP) studies revealed that in Tam-R cells the ERalpha assembled on the AR gene promoter and this was associated with elevated basal expression of AR mRNA. Furthermore, AR mRNA expression was under the regulation of the EGFR/MAPK and ERalpha signalling pathways. Neutralising antibodies to AR inhibited EGFR/ERK1/2 activity, reduced S118 ERalpha phosphorylation and reduced AR mRNA expression in TAM-R cells. These findings suggest that ERalpha function in Tam-R cells is maintained as a consequence of EGFR/MAPK-mediated phosphorylation at serine residue 118 resulting in the generation of a self-propogating autocrine growth-regulatory loop through the ERalpha-mediated production of AR.

This paper describes the establishment of an antiestrogen-resistant MCF7 breast cancer cell subline (FASMCF) by continuous culture of the estrogen-responsive parental line in steroid-depleted, ICI 182,780 (Faslodex; 10(-7) M)-supplemented medium. After a 3-month period of growth suppression, cells began to proliferate in ICI 182,780 at rates similar to those of untreated wild-type cells. Immunocytochemistry showed these cells to have reduced estrogen receptor and an absence of progesterone receptor proteins. RT-PCR and transient transfection studies with estrogen response element-reporter constructs confirmed that ICI 182,780-suppressed estrogen response element-mediated signaling. FASMCF cells show increased dependence upon epidermal growth factor receptor (EgfR)/mitogen-activated protein kinase (MAPK)-mediated signaling. Thus, EgfR protein and messenger RNA, growth responses to transforming growth factor-alpha, and extracellular signal-regulated kinase 1/2 MAPK activation levels are all increased. Unlike wild-type cells, FASMCF cells are highly sensitive to growth inhibition by an EgfR-specific tyrosine-kinase inhibitor (TKI), ZD1839 (Iressa), and an inhibitor of the activation of MEK1 (MAPKK), PD098059. Short-term ( approximately 3 weeks) withdrawal of cells from antiestrogen had no effect on growth or phenotype, whereas longer withdrawal (10 weeks) appeared to partially reverse the cellular phenotype with increasing estrogen receptor and decreasing EgfR levels. In subsequent studies FASMCF cells were maintained in TKI, where their growth was again suppressed and secondary TKI resistance failed to develop within the 3-month period in which initial ICI 182,780 resistance arose. Furthermore, wild-type cells similarly maintained in combination ICI 182,780 and TKI treatment conditions remained growth arrested (6 months), with notable cell loss through both reduced rates of cellular proliferation and increased cell death.

Selective oestrogen receptor downregulators (SERDs) are a class of highly effective steroidal antitumour agents that reduce cellular levels of the oestrogen receptor (ER). In this study, we compared the efficacy by which three novel molecular approaches: (1) antisense oligonucleotides; (2) antisense RNA; and (3) dominant negative mutants are able to act as SERDs. Using transient and, where appropriate, stable gene transfection experiments we found that constitutive overexpression of ER antisense RNA and a hormone-binding domain compromised dominant-negative ER mutant (DNER-1), were most effective at downregulating ER expression and/or activity in vitro.

Multiple lines of evidence implicate steroid hormone and growth factor cross-talk as a modulator of endocrine response in breast cancer and that aberrations in growth factor signaling pathways are a common element in the endocrine resistant phenotype. Delineation of these relationships is thus an important diagnostic goal in cancer research, while the targeting of aberrant growth factor signaling holds the promise of improving therapeutic response rates.

Background : Tamoxifen, a non-steroidal estrogen antagonist, is the most prescribed drug for the treatment of breast cancer. The use of tamoxifen is limited, however, by the development of resistance to this compound in most patients. Although tamoxifen behaves primarily as an estrogen antagonist, it has agonist (or growth-stimulatory) activity as well. ICI 182,780 is a 7α-alkyl-sulfinyl analogue of estradiol lacking agonist activity. The absence of agonist activity may make this steroidal antiestrogen superior to tamoxifen in suppressing tumor cell growth. Purpose : We compared the inhibitory effects of ICI 182,780, tamoxifen, and estrogen withdrawal on the growth of established tumors and on tumorigenesis in a model system that uses estrogen-dependent, human MCF-7 breast tumor cells growing in athymic nude mice. We also studied the hormonal responsiveness of tumors that became resistant to the two estrogen antagonists and the effects of these drugs on estrogen-regulated gene expression. Methods : MCF-7 cells were injected subcutaneously into the flanks of castrated, female nude mice. The effects of repeated doses of tamoxifen and ICI 182,780 (500 μg and 5 mg, respectively) on the growth of established tumors (8-10 mm in size) were determined after supplemental estrogen was removed. The effects of antiestrogen treatments on the process of tumorigenesis, in the absence of estrogen supplementation, were determined by initiating drug administration on the same day as tumor cell inoculation. To evaluate the hormonal responsiveness of tumors resistant to tamoxifen and ICI 182,780, 1-mm 3 segments of the tumors were transplanted onto the flanks of new recipient mice, which were then treated with estrogen or the antiestrogens-alone or in combination. Tumor growth was monitored by measuring tumor volumes twice a week. Expression of the estrogen-responsive genes, pLIV1 and pS2, in the tumors of treated animals was analyzed using blots of total cellular RNA and complementary DNA probes. Results : Treatment with ICI 182,780 suppressed the growth of established tumors twice as long as treatment with tamoxifen or estrogen withdrawal. Tumorigenesis, in the absence of supplemental estrogen, was delayed to a greater extent in ICI 182,780-treated mice than in tamoxifen-treated mice. ICI 182,780 was found to be more effective than tamoxifen in reducing the expression of estrogen-regulated genes. Most tumors eventually became resistant to ICI 182,780 and grew independently of estrogen. Conclusions : ICI 182,780 is a more effective estrogen antagonist than tamoxifen in the MCF-7 tumor cell/nude mouse model system. [J Natl Cancer Inst 87 :746-750, 1995]

The endometrial morphology, endometrial steroid receptors and serum steroid hormone concentrations have been studied in 22 infertile women participating in an in-vitro fertilization, gamete intra-Fallopian transfer programme, including nine cases following treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone analogue/human menopausal gonadotrophin/human chorionic gonadotrophin. All patients had normal ovulatory function before treatment and satisfactory response to ovulation induction. Endometrial biopsies were taken in spontaneous and treatment cycles on the fourth day after ovulation had been detected by ultrasound scanning, when endometrial receptors were measured using immunohistochemistry. Histological examination of biopsies in spontaneous cycles showed the majority (20/22) to be 'in-phase', while in two cases luteal phase defect was diagnosed. After ovulation induction, all the biopsies were still morphologically 'in-phase', although a significant reduction had occurred in the nuclear receptor level in both the glands and stroma for both progesterone receptors (gland P = 0.030, stroma P = 0.012 using microscopic analysis; gland P = 0.020, stroma P < 0.001 using a cell analysis system) and oestrogen receptors (gland P = 0.017, stroma P = 0.002 using direct microscopic analysis). This suggests that a reduction in steroid receptors in the endometrium occurs after ovulation induction in the presence of supraphysiological amounts of steroids, which is not associated with detectable morphological changes.

A new dual immunocytochemical assay for oestrogen receptor (ER) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) has been developed. It has been tested in a variety of conditions using cell culture lines and the results correlate well with those obtained from single immunocytochemical assays. MCF-7 and A431 cells and a mixture of the two types of cell were assessed immunocytochemically for ER and EGFR. ER showed immunopositivity of 30% in MCF-7 cells, 10% in the mixture and 0% in A431 cells. EGFR demonstrated immunopositivity of 0% in MCF-7 cells, 70% in the mixture and 100% in A431 cells. Dual immunocytochemical assays using anti-ER followed by anti-EGFR monoclonal antibodies on single histological sections showed similar reactivity to the single assays. Three staining patterns were seen in the mixture: ER+/EGFR- (MCF-7 cells), ER-/EGFR- (MCF-7 cells) and ER-/EGFR+ (A431 cells). ZR-75-1 and MDA-MB-231 cells and their retrovirally transfected counterparts ZR/HERc and MDA/HEGO cells were then analysed. The dual assay revealed the fourth phenotype (ER+/EGFR+) in 40% of ZR/HERc cells and in 10% of MDA/HEGO cells. This is the first description of a dual immunocytochemical assay system for ER and EGFR on single 5 microns frozen section samples. Studies are now underway assessing breast carcinoma sections which may allow investigation of the clonality of human breast cancer.

106 previously untreated breast cancer patients have been immunohistochemically analysed for EGF-R, ER, Ki67, and c-erbB-2 product. All patients received assessable endocrine therapy following disease progression. Significant associations were observed between EGF-R and ER (inverse) and Ki67 (direct). No association was observed between EGF-R and the c-erbB-2 product. EGF-R expression was significantly associated with the loss of endocrine sensitivity in breast cancer. This was observed in both ER positive and negative disease. In ER positive breast cancers, EGF-R expression had no significant influence on the quality of tumour remissions. Further sub-classification of the ER/EGF-R data by Ki67 immunostaining showed that in ER+/EGF-R- disease, increasing proportions of Ki67 positive cells were associated with a decline in the numbers of women experiencing good quality tumour remissions. A similar trend was also observed in ER+/EGF-R+ tumours. The presence of c-erbB-2 protein product did not influence endocrine sensitivity in any of the ER/EGF-R sub-groups.

The expression of four oestrogen-responsive genes in 118 immunohistochemically defined primary breast tumours has been determined by northern analysis. While all the genes are induced by oestrogen in oestrogen receptor (ER)-positive cell lines, their behaviour is different in breast tumour biopsies. This behaviour can be divided into two groups; the first containing the genes, pLIV1 and pLIV2 (pS2), which both show a significant association with ER status (P = 0.001) and a corresponding inverse relationship with epidermal growth factor receptors (EGFR) (P = 0.01 and P = 0.08, respectively). In addition, the mRNA levels of both pLIV1 and pS2 are greater in ER-positive compared to ER-negative disease (P = 0.001). While a small number of ER-negative tumours were positive for either pLIV1 (12%) or pS2 (9%), we failed to observe co-expression of pLIV1 and pS2 in ER-negative disease. In ER-positive disease, four tumour populations were identified; ER+pLIV1−pS2−, ER+pLIV1−pS2+, ER+pLIV1+pS2− and ER+pLIV1+pS2+. Interestingly, the levels of pLIV1 and pS2 when co-expressed were significantly greater in ER+pLIV1+pS2+ tumours compared to either of the ER+pLIV1+pS2− (P = 0.03) or ER+pLIV1−pS2+ (P = 0.01) mixed phenotypes. Unlike pLIV1 and pS2, pSYD3 and pSYD8 belong to a group of genes which are expressed in the majority of tumours regardless of ER and EGFR status. However, lower pSYD8 mRNA levels were detected in moderately EGFR-positive disease (P = 0.06) while both pSYD3 positivity (P = 0.01) and mRNA levels (P = 0.001) were increased in highly proliferating tumours as shown by Ki67 immunostaining. These genes provide additional markers which, in conjunction with other parameters, may help to determine the likelihood of a given tumour to respond to endocrine therapy.

The percentage of oestrogen receptor (ER) positive cells in a series of 118 breast cancers has been examined by immunohistochemistry in relation to patients' response to endocrine therapy. Positive and negative predictive values have been used to calculate appropriate cut-off points. The rate of response to treatment was significantly higher in women with receptor positive tumours, especially where the tumours contained more than 70% positive cells. Tumours that were apparently negative for ER expression rarely responded to endocrine therapy. The hormone sensitivity of ER positive breast cancer was also influenced by the rate of tumour cell proliferation, with tumours expressing high levels of Ki67 immunostaining rarely responding to therapy.

Phase II studies examining the endocrinological and clinical efficacy of Zoladex® and Zoladex® plus tamoxifen have been examined in pre- and peri-menopausal women with advanced breast cancer. No adverse endocrinological interaction between the drugs have been observed. Although a higher proportion of static disease was observed with the combination of the drugs, which possibly occurred at the expense of partial remissions, the time to disease progression was extended in women who received Zoladex® plus tamoxifen. Remissions were primarily restricted to patients whose tumours were ER positive. Only occasional responses were seen in ER negative disease. This was especially evident where the ER negative tumours were EGF-R positive and showed high rates of cell proliferation.

Background Endocrine resistance is a major hurdle in breast cancer management, and determining the underlying factors driving its growth and aggressive behaviour should vastly improve treatment. Methods Microarray technology (BD Atlas Plastic Human 12 K Microarrays; GeneSifter software), verified by PCR, western blotting and immunocytochemisty, was used to identify genes increased in acquired resistant models to tamoxifen (TamR) or faslodex (FasR) as potential predictive/prognostic markers and new therapeutic targets. Results Alongside known breast cancer genes (β-catenin, PEA3, vitronectin, CD44), two novel genes in endocrine resistance were revealed (the latter never previously described in breast cancer): a securin/cell cycle regulator Pituitary Tumour Transforming Gene-1 (PTTG1), and GDNF receptor-alpha 3 (GFRα3) reported to promote cell survival signalling via RET coreceptor. Altered levels of PTTG1, GFRα3, or their associated family members were observed in further endocrine resistant states, including an additional faslodex resistant model that has progressed to a highly-aggressive state (FasR-Lt) and XMCF-7 cells resistant to oestrogen deprivation. PTTG1 and GFRα3 induction were also implicated in limiting response to anti-EGFR agents currently in breast cancer trials, with GFRα3 ligand (artemin) largely overcoming drug response. mRNA studies in clinical disease revealed PTTG1 associated with lymph node spread, high tumour grade and proliferation, while GFRα3 was enriched in ER-negative tumours and those expressing EGFR, profiles implying roles in clinical resistance and aggressive tumour behaviour. Promisingly, PTTG1 or GFRα3 siRNA knockdown promoted cell kill and inhibited proliferation in the resistant models. Conclusion Cumulatively, these data indicate PTTG1 and GFRα3 may provide useful biomarkers, and perhaps clinically relevant therapeutic targets for multiple resistant states.

A complementary DNA library from MCF-7 cells was screened using 32P-cDNA derived from a breast carcinoma and from normal breast tissue. From 10(5) plaques (20% of library) we obtained a clone (Md2) which was differentially expressed in the carcinoma. The distribution of its corresponding transcript of 6-700 nucleotides was examined in normal and neoplastic cells, by filter and in situ hybridisation. We observed localisation of 35S-Md2 to the tumour cells of breast cancers with no significant reaction over stromal or vascular elements or on normal ductal epithelia. M13 sequencing showed Md2 to be 250 nucleotides in length, of which 197 were homologous to the 3'-untranslated region and a short open reading frame of the pS2 gene (Masiakowski et al., 1982). Md2 mRNA was found principally in breast carcinoma cell lines and tumours, with low levels in benign breast disease and no expression in non-breast squamous cell lines. Approximately 43% (23/54) of carcinomas contained this mRNA (varying from + to + + + + level); it was present in 20/38 (53%) of ER positive carcinomas compared to 3/16 (19%) of ER negative carcinomas. In 21 patients who had undergone primary endocrine therapy for recurrent disease expression of Md2 in the primary tumour correlated with the subsequent response to treatment (P = 0.041) and was of similar predictive value as ER status. Both tests correctly predicted outcome in about 76% of cases. Images Figure 1 Figure 2 Figure 3 Figure 5 Figure 6 Figure 7 Figure 8

Recent studies have demonstrated a consistent inverse relationship between oestrogen receptor (ER) and epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) levels in female human breast cancer. Serial cross-section studies have suggested that separate populations of ER+/EGFR- and ER-/EGFR+ cancer cells exist in tumours deemed by immunocytochemical assay (ICA) to be positive for both. We have developed a dual ICA that is able to stain for both ER and EGFR on a single 5 microns frozen section sample of breast tissue. Twenty-two samples of female human breast cancer tissue that exhibited positivity for ER and EGFR by ER-ICA using the H222 monoclonal antibody and EGFR-ICA using the EGFR1 monoclonal antibody underwent the dual ICA. There was a significant correlation in receptor positivity between the single and dual assays for both ER (rs = 0.801, P < 0.001) and EGFR (rs = 0.831, P < 0.001). Individual cancer cells exhibited one of three staining patterns: nuclear staining only (ER+/EGFR-), membrane-associated and cytoplasmic staining only (ER-/EGFR+) or no staining (ER-/EGFR-). No cancer cells exhibited both nuclear and membrane/cytoplasmic staining. This is the first description of a simultaneous dual immunocytochemical assay system for ER and EGFR in clinical breast cancer specimens. The results suggest that ER and EGFR expression are mutually exclusive within an individual breast cancer cell in vivo with separate populations of ER+/EGFR- cells, ER-/EGFR+ cells and ER-/EGFR- cells coexisting. Images Figure 3 Figure 4 Figure 5

Northern hybridization analyses of the oestrogen-inducible mRNAs pLIV1 and pS2 were compared with oestrogen receptor (ER) immunocytochemistry assessments in 40 untreated primary or early recurrent breast tumours. Significant associations were observed between pLIV1/ER (P < 0.03), pS2/ER (P < 0.001) and pLIV1/pS2 (P < 0.04) status. After disease recurrence, patients were treated with assessable courses of endocrine therapies. Positive pLIV1, pS2 and ER statuses in primary disease were consequently found to be predictive of endocrine responsiveness in the secondary lesions (P < 0.03, P < 0.02, P < 0.005 respectively). However, despite these associations, a number of pLIV1- and/or pS2-positive tumours failed to respond to therapy.

In order to isolate markers of oestrogen responsiveness in breast cancer, we have cloned a number of oestrogen-regulated genes. Two of these, pLIV1 and pLIV2 (pS2), have been shown to be predominantly expressed in oestrogen receptor (ER)+ tumours. In this study, we examined their expression in relation to various clinical and histopathological features of breast cancer, and showed that pLIV1, but not pS2, is significantly associated with lymph node involvement (P0.01), while pS2 is more frequently observed in premenopausal patients (P0.05). Subdivision of the pLIV1 data by ER and nodal status of the tumour identified a highly significant association between pLIV1 expression and lymph node involvement in ER-positive disease, with 15/24 (63%) ER+ pLIV1+ tumours showing nodal involvement. Conversely, 20/23 (87%) ER+ pLIV1- patients were lymph node-negative (P0.001). Subdivision of the pS2 data by ER status did not reach significance. The application of pLIV1 as a marker of lymph node involvement was further exemplified in small tumours (2 cm), where 11/12 (92%) lymph node-positive patients expressed pLIV1, while 17/22 (77%) node-negative patients were pLIV1 negative (P0.001). Similarly, pLIV1 expression identified lymph node involvement in moderately differentiated tumours (P0.01), but was independent of vascular invasion. pLIV1 may, therefore, represent a candidate gene for metastatic spread in ER+ breast cancer.