5 results on '"Richterova D"'
Search Results
2. PFAS levels and determinants of variability in exposure in European teenagers – Results from the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014–2021)
- Author
-
Richterová, D., Govarts, E., Fábelová, L., Rausová, K., Rodriguez Martin, L., Gilles, L., Remy, S., Colles, A., Rambaud, L., Riou, M., Gabriel, C., Sarigiannis, D., Pedraza-Diaz, S., Ramos, J.J., Kosjek, T., Snoj Tratnik, J., Lignell, S., Gyllenhammar, I., Thomsen, C., Haug, L.S., Kolossa-Gehring, M., Vogel, N., Franken, C., Vanlarebeke, N., Bruckers, L., Stewart, L., Sepai, O., Schoeters, G., Uhl, M., Castaño, A., Esteban López, M., Göen, T., and Palkovičová Murínová, Ľ.
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
3. PFAS levels and determinants of variability in exposure in European teenagers - Results from the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014-2021)
- Author
-
D. Richterová, E. Govarts, L. Fábelová, K. Rausová, L. Rodriguez Martin, L. Gilles, S. Remy, A. Colles, L. Rambaud, M. Riou, C. Gabriel, D. Sarigiannis, S. Pedraza-Diaz, J.J. Ramos, T. Kosjek, J. Snoj Tratnik, S. Lignell, I. Gyllenhammar, C. Thomsen, L.S. Haug, M. Kolossa-Gehring, N. Vogel, C. Franken, N. Vanlarebeke, L. Bruckers, L. Stewart, O. Sepai, G. Schoeters, M. Uhl, A. Castaño, M. Esteban López, T. Göen, Ľ. Palkovičová Murínová, RAMBAUD, Loic/0000-0002-2894-5044, Richterova, D., Govarts, E., Fabelova, L., Rausova, K., Martin, L. Rodriguez, Gilles, L., Remy, S., Colles, A., Rambaud, L., Riou, M., Gabriel, C., Sarigiannis, D., Pedraza-Diaz, S., Ramos, J. J., Kosjek, T., Tratnik, J. Snoj, Lignell, S., Gyllenhammar, I, Thomsen, C., Haug, L. S., Kolossa-Gehring, M., Vogel, N., Franken, C., Vanlarebeke, N., BRUCKERS, Liesbeth, Stewart, L., Sepai, O., Schoeters, G., Uhl, M., Castano, A., Lopez, M. Esteban, Goeen, T., Murinova, L' Palkovicova, Unión Europea. Comisión Europea. H2020, Swedish Environmental Protection Agency, Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency, The Research Council of Norway, Ministry of Health (República Checa), Ministerio de Agricultura, Pesca y Alimentación (España), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Jožef Stefan Institute, Ministère de la Santé (Francia), Federal Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Building and Nuclear Safety (Alemania), and Government of Flanders
- Subjects
Male ,HBM4EU ,Fluorocarbons ,Adolescent ,Data Collection ,Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health ,Fishes ,Adolescents ,Diet ,Exposure ,Perfluoroalkyl substances ,Alkanesulfonic Acids ,Linear Models ,Animals ,Humans ,Female ,Environmental Pollutants ,Food consumption ,Determinants - Abstract
Background: Perfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS) are man-made fluorinated chemicals, widely used in various types of consumer products, resulting in their omnipresence in human populations. The aim of this study was to describe current PFAS levels in European teenagers and to investigate the determinants of serum/plasma con-centrations in this specific age group.Methods: PFAS concentrations were determined in serum or plasma samples from 1957 teenagers (12-18 years) from 9 European countries as part of the HBM4EU aligned studies (2014-2021). Questionnaire data were post -harmonized by each study and quality checked centrally. Only PFAS with an overall quantification frequency of at least 60% (PFOS, PFOA, PFHxS and PFNA) were included in the analyses. Sociodemographic and lifestyle factors were analysed together with food consumption frequencies to identify determinants of PFAS exposure. The variables study, sex and the highest educational level of household were included as fixed factors in the multivariable linear regression models for all PFAS and each dietary variable was added to the fixed model one by one and for each PFAS separately.Results: The European exposure values for PFAS were reported as geometric means with 95% confidence intervals (CI): PFOS [2.13 mu g/L (1.63-2.78)], PFOA ([0.97 mu g/L (0.75-1.26)]), PFNA [0.30 mu g/L (0.19-0.45)] and PFHxS [0.41 mu g/L (0.33-0.52)]. The estimated geometric mean exposure levels were significantly higher in the North and West versus the South and East of Europe. Boys had significantly higher concentrations of the four PFAS compared to girls and significantly higher PFASs concentrations were found in teenagers from households with a higher education level. Consumption of seafood and fish at least 2 times per week was significantly associated with 21% (95% CI: 12-31%) increase in PFOS concentrations and 20% (95% CI: 10-31%) increase in PFNA concentrations as compared to less frequent consumption of seafood and fish. The same trend was observed for PFOA and PFHxS but not statistically significant. Consumption of eggs at least 2 times per week was associated with 11% (95% CI: 2-22%) and 14% (95% CI: 2-27%) increase in PFOS and PFNA concentrations, respectively, as compared to less frequent consumption of eggs. Significantly higher PFOS concentrations were observed for participants consuming offal (14% (95% CI: 3-26%)), the same trend was observed for the other PFAS but not statistically significant. Local food consumption at least 2 times per week was associated with 40% (95% CI: 19-64%) increase in PFOS levels as compared to those consuming local food less frequently.Conclusion: This work provides information about current levels of PFAS in European teenagers and potential dietary sources of exposure to PFAS in European teenagers. These results can be of use for targeted monitoring of PFAS in food. This work was supported by the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme under Grant agreement No 733032 HBM4EU (www.HBM4EU.eu), and received co-funding from the authors’ organizations: Riksmaten Adolescents: Riksmaten Adolescents was performed by the Swedish Food Agency with financial support from the Swedish Environmental Protection Agency and the Swedish Civil Contingencies Agency. NEB II: The Norwegian Institute of Public Health (NIPH) has contributed to funding of the Norwegian Environmental Biobank (NEB). The laboratory measurements have partly been funded by the Research Council of Norway through research projects (275903 and 268465) PCB cohort follow-up: PCB cohort follow-up received additional funding from the Ministry of Health of the Slovak Republic, program 07B0103. BEA: BEA study was funded by the Spanish Ministry of Agriculture, Fisheries and Food and the Instituto de Salud Carlos III (SEG 1321/15) SLO-CRP: The Slovenian SLO-CRP study was co-financed by the Joˇzef Stefan Institute program P1- 0143, and a national project “Exposure of children and adolescents to selected chemicals through their habitat environment” (grant agreement No. C2715-16-634802). CROME: CROME study was co-funded by the European Commission research funds of Horizon 2020. ESTEBAN: ESTEBAN study was funded by Sant´e Publique France and the French ministries of Health and the Environment. GerES V-sub: The funding of the German Ministry for the Environment, Nature Conservation, Nuclear Safety and Consumer Protection is gratefully acknowledged. FLEHS IV: The Flemish Center of Expertise on Environment and Health is funded by the Government of Flanders, Department of Environment & Spatial Development. We are grateful to all teenagers and their families that participated in the studies. HBM4EU is co-financed under Horizon 2020 (grant agreement No 733032). FLEHS: We thank the field workers from the Provincial Institute of Hygiene and VITO for the sample and data collection. All collaborators of the scientific teams of the Flemish Center of Expertise on Environment and Health (https://www.milieu-en-gezondheid.be/en/about-the-cente r-0) and Karen Van Campenhout and Caroline Teughels from the Flemish Department of Environment & Spatial Development for their valuable input in the field work committee. Riksmaten Adolescents: Personnel from the regional Occupational and Environmental Medicine Divisions in Gothenburg, Linkoping, ¨ Lund, Stockholm, and Umeå are acknowledged for help with blood sampling. Jonathan P. Benskin and colleagues at the Department of Environmental Science and Analytical Chemistry, Stockholm University are acknowledged for the chemical analyses. PCB cohort follow-up: We wish to thank Dana Jureˇckova, ´ MD, PhD, head of Department of Pediatrics, hospital “Svet zdravia”, Michalovce and her personnel for blood sampling, questionnaire administration and examination of adolescents, personnel from the laboratory of biochemistry and haematology (AlphaMedical) in Michalovce, Slovakia, for blood samples processing and colleagues from RECETOX, Masaryk University, Brno, Czech Republic, for chemical analyses.
- Published
- 2023
4. Current exposure to phthalates and DINCH in European children and adolescents - Results from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies 2014 to 2021.
- Author
-
Vogel N, Schmidt P, Lange R, Gerofke A, Sakhi AK, Haug LS, Jensen TK, Frederiksen H, Szigeti T, Csákó Z, Murinova LP, Sidlovska M, Janasik B, Wasowicz W, Tratnik JS, Mazej D, Gabriel C, Karakitsios S, Barbone F, Rosolen V, Rambaud L, Riou M, Murawski A, Leseman D, Koppen G, Covaci A, Lignell S, Lindroos AK, Zvonar M, Andryskova L, Fabelova L, Richterova D, Horvat M, Kosjek T, Sarigiannis D, Maroulis M, Pedraza-Diaz S, Cañas A, Verheyen VJ, Bastiaensen M, Gilles L, Schoeters G, Esteban-López M, Castaño A, Govarts E, Koch HM, and Kolossa-Gehring M
- Subjects
- Humans, Child, Adolescent, Environmental Exposure analysis, Environmental Pollutants analysis, Phthalic Acids metabolism
- Abstract
Phthalates are mainly used as plasticizers for polyvinyl chloride (PVC). Exposure to several phthalates is associated with different adverse effects most prominently on the development of reproductive functions. The HBM4EU Aligned Studies (2014-2021) have investigated current European exposure to ten phthalates (DEP, BBzP, DiBP, DnBP, DCHP, DnPeP, DEHP, DiNP, DiDP, DnOP) and the substitute DINCH to answer the open policy relevant questions which were defined by HBM4EU partner countries and EU institutions as the starting point of the programme. The exposure dataset includes ∼5,600 children (6-11 years) and adolescents (12-18 years) from up to 12 countries per age group and covering the North, East, South and West European regions. Study data from participating studies were harmonised with respect to sample size and selection of participants, selection of biomarkers, and quality and comparability of analytical results to provide a comparable perspective of European exposure. Phthalate and DINCH exposure were deduced from urinary excretions of metabolites, where concentrations were expressed as their key descriptor geometric mean (GM) and 95th percentile (P95). This study aims at reporting current exposure levels and differences in these between European studies and regions, as well as comparisons to human biomonitoring guidance values (HBM-GVs). GMs for children were highest for ∑DEHP metabolites (33.6 μg/L), MiBP (26.6 μg/L), and MEP (24.4 μg/L) and lowest for∑DiDP metabolites (1.91 μg/L) and ∑DINCH metabolites (3.57 μg/L). In adolescents highest GMs were found for MEP (43.3 μg/L), ∑DEHP metabolites (28.8 μg/L), and MiBP (25.6 μg/L) and lowest for ∑DiDP metabolites (= 2.02 μg/L) and ∑DINCH metabolites (2.51 μg/L). In addition, GMs and P95 stratified by European region, sex, household education level, and degree of urbanization are presented. Differences in average biomarker concentrations between sampling sites (data collections) ranged from factor 2 to 9. Compared to the European average, children in the sampling sites OCC (Denmark), InAirQ (Hungary), and SPECIMEn (The Netherlands) had the lowest concentrations across all metabolites and ESTEBAN (France), NAC II (Italy), and CROME (Greece) the highest. For adolescents, comparably higher metabolite concentrations were found in NEB II (Norway), PCB cohort (Slovakia), and ESTEBAN (France), and lower concentrations in POLAES (Poland), FLEHS IV (Belgium), and GerES V-sub (Germany). Multivariate analyses (Survey Generalized Linear Models) indicate compound-specific differences in average metabolite concentrations between the four European regions. Comparison of individual levels with HBM-GVs revealed highest rates of exceedances for DnBP and DiBP, with up to 3 and 5%, respectively, in children and adolescents. No exceedances were observed for DEP and DINCH. With our results we provide current, detailed, and comparable data on exposure to phthalates in children and - for the first time - in adolescents, and - for the first time - on DINCH in children and adolescents of all four regions of Europe which are particularly suited to inform exposure and risk assessment and answer open policy relevant questions., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest related to this work., (Copyright © 2023 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
5. From science to policy: How European HBM indicators help to answer policy questions related to phthalates and DINCH exposure.
- Author
-
Gerofke A, David M, Schmidt P, Vicente JL, Buekers J, Gilles L, Colles A, Bessems J, Bastiaensen M, Covaci A, Den Hond E, Koppen G, Laeremans M, Verheyen VJ, Černá M, Klánová J, Krsková A, Zvonař M, Knudsen LE, Koch HM, Jensen TK, Rambaud L, Riou M, Vogel N, Gabriel C, Karakitsios S, Papaioannou N, Sarigiannis D, Kakucs R, Középesy S, Rudnai P, Szigeti T, Barbone F, Rosolen V, Guignard C, Gutleb AC, Sakhi AK, Haug LS, Janasik B, Ligocka D, Estokova M, Fabelova L, Kolena B, Murinova LP, Petrovicova I, Richterova D, Horvat M, Mazej D, Tratnik JS, Runkel AA, Castaño A, Esteban-López M, Pedraza-Díaz S, Åkesson A, Lignell S, Vlaanderen J, Zock JP, Schoeters G, and Kolossa-Gehring M
- Subjects
- Male, Child, Female, Adolescent, Humans, Policy, Biological Monitoring, Carboxylic Acids, Phthalic Acids
- Abstract
Within the European Human Biomonitoring (HBM) Initiative HBM4EU we derived HBM indicators that were designed to help answering key policy questions and support chemical policies. The result indicators convey information on chemicals exposure of different age groups, sexes, geographical regions and time points by comparing median exposure values. If differences are observed for one group or the other, policy measures or risk management options can be implemented. Impact indicators support health risk assessment by comparing exposure values with health-based guidance values, such as human biomonitoring guidance values (HBM-GVs). In general, the indicators should be designed to translate complex scientific information into short and clear messages and make it accessible to policy makers but also to a broader audience such as stakeholders (e.g. NGO's), other scientists and the general public. Based on harmonized data from the HBM4EU Aligned Studies (2014-2021), the usefulness of our indicators was demonstrated for the age group children (6-11 years), using two case examples: one phthalate (Diisobutyl phthalate: DiBP) and one non-phthalate substitute (Di-isononyl cyclohexane-1,2- dicarboxylate: DINCH). For the comparison of age groups, these were compared to data for teenagers (12-18 years), and time periods were compared using data from the DEMOCOPHES project (2011-2012). Our result indicators proved to be suitable for demonstrating the effectiveness of policy measures for DiBP and the need of continuous monitoring for DINCH. They showed similar exposure for boys and girls, indicating that there is no need for gender focused interventions and/or no indication of sex-specific exposure patterns. They created a basis for a targeted approach by highlighting relevant geographical differences in internal exposure. An adequate data basis is essential for revealing differences for all indicators. This was particularly evident in our studies on the indicators on age differences. The impact indicator revealed that health risks based on exposure to DiBP cannot be excluded. This is an indication or flag for risk managers and policy makers that exposure to DiBP still is a relevant health issue. HBM indicators derived within HBM4EU are a valuable and important complement to existing indicator lists in the context of environment and health. Their applicability, current shortcomings and solution strategies are outlined., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest The authors declare no conflict of interest., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier GmbH.. All rights reserved.)
- Published
- 2023
- Full Text
- View/download PDF
Catalog
Discovery Service for Jio Institute Digital Library
For full access to our library's resources, please sign in.