Search

AbstractObjectiveMethodsResultsConclusionTo evaluate the overall survival (OS) of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) receiving either ibrutinib monotherapy as a first-line (1L) treatment or chemotherapy/chemoimmunotherapy-based (CT/CIT) regimens in 1L followed by ibrutinib in the second line (1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib) after disease progression by emulating a randomized trial comparing both treatment sequences.Patient-level data from the RESONATE-2 trial (NCT01722487) and real-world PHEDRA databases were analyzed. Three scenarios were considered using the following data sources: (1) RESONATE-2, (2) combined RESONATE-2/PHEDRA, (3) combined RESONATE-2/PHEDRA for 1L ibrutinib and PHEDRA for 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib. Propensity score-based weights and inverse probability of censoring weighting were used to adjust for baseline (Scenarios 2 and 3) and time-dependent confounding (all scenarios), and to address potential biases. A weighted Cox proportional hazards model was used to estimate the OS hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) for 1L ibrutinib versus 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib.Results from Scenario 1 showed a significantly lower risk of death with 1L ibrutinib compared with 1L chlorambucil followed by 2L ibrutinib (HR 0.35 [95% CI 0.20–0.62]). Results from Scenarios 2 and 3 demonstrated a reduced risk of death with 1L ibrutinib compared with 1L CT/CIT-2L ibrutinib (HR 0.35 [0.21–0.61] and 0.64 [0.39–1.04], respectively).The analyses consistently showed a reduced risk of death when ibrutinib was used as a 1L treatment in CLL compared with delaying its use until 2L after CT/CIT regimens, which suggests that initiating ibrutinib in 1L is advantageous for improving survival outcomes. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

One of the most common subgroups of cutaneous T-cell lymphomas is that of primary cutaneous CD30-positive lymphoproliferative disorders. The group includes lymphomatoid papulosis (LyP) and primary cutaneous anaplastic large cell lymphoma (pcALCL), as well as some borderline cases. Recently, significant progress has been made in understanding the genetics and treatment of these disorders. This review article summarises the clinical evidence supporting the current treatment options for these diseases. Recent years have seen the introduction of novel agents into clinical practice; most of these target CD30, such as anti-CD30 monoclonal antibodies and conjugated antibodies (brentuximab vedotin), bispecific antibodies and cellular therapies, particularly anti-CD30 CAR-T cells. This paper briefly reviews the biology of CD30 that makes it a good therapeutic target and describes the anti-CD30 therapies that have emerged to date. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recent years have seen significant improvement in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) management. Targeting B-cell lymphoma (BCL-2) and Bruton's kinase (BTK) have become the main strategies to restrain CLL activity. These agents are generally well tolerated, but the discontinuation of these therapies happens due to resistance, adverse effects, and Richter's transformation. A growing population of patients who have previously used both BTK inhibitors and BCL2 suffer from the constriction of the following regimens. This review explores the resistance mechanisms for both ibrutinib and venetoclax. Moreover, we present innovative approaches evaluated for treating double-refractory CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Despite advances in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment, drug resistance remains a clinical challenge. We aimed to develop a prognostic model for bortezomib resistance based on miRNA expression profiling. The study included 40 previously untreated MM patients receiving bortezomib-based regimens (20 treatment-sensitive, 20 resistant). Pretreatment venous blood samples were analyzed for miRNA expression. Differential expression analysis revealed upregulated miR-27b-3p (FC 1.45, p = 0.017) and let-7b-5p (FC 1.44, p = 0.025) in the resistant group. Univariate analysis identified let-7b-5p (OR 3.17, 95%CI: 1.19–11.4, p = 0.04) and miR-27b-3p (OR 4.73, 95%CI: 1.4–26.6, p = 0.036) as risk factors for resistance. The final multivariate model included miR-27b-3p (OR 23.1, 95% CI: 2.8–452, p = 0.015), let-7b-5p (OR 4.38, 95% CI: 1.28–22.2, p = 0.038), and miR-103a-3p (OR 15.3, 95% CI: 1.33–351, p = 0.049). These miRNAs may serve as biomarkers of treatment response in MM. However, external validation is necessary to confirm the clinical utility of our model. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: The degree of differentiation of leukemic cells seen in clinical practice is significant. The dissimilarities concern morphology, cytogenetics, and immunophenotype. This leads to a distinction between typical chronic lymphocytic leukemia and the atypical one, which is not taken into consideration in the standard diagnostic process yet. The heterogenic course of the disease encourages the search for prognostic factors that would aid in the selection of the most effective individual therapy for each patient. The atypical CLL constitutes a major difficulty in the diagnostic process and, therefore, in the choice of accurate treatment. A diagnosis of typical chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) requires the presence of ≥5000 clonal B-lymphocytes/μL, the coexistence of CD19, CD20, CD5, and CD23, the restriction of light chain immunoglobulin, and the lack of expression of antigens CD22 and CD79b. Atypical CLL (aCLL) can be distinguished from typical CLL morphologically and immunophenotypically. Morphologically atypical CLL cells have been defined mainly as large, atypical forms, prolymphocytes, or cleaved cells. However, current aCLL diagnostics rely more on immunophenotypic characteristics rather than atypical morphology. Immunophenotypically, atypical CLL differs from classic CLL in the lack of expression of one or fewer surface antigens, most commonly CD5 and CD23, and the patient does not meet the criteria for a diagnosis of any other B-cell lymphoid malignancy. Morphologically atypical CLL has more aggressive clinical behavior and worse prognosis than classic CLL. Patients with aCLL are more likely to display markers associated with poor prognosis, including trisomy 12, unmutated IGVH, and CD38 expression, compared with classic CLL. However, no standard or commonly accepted criteria exist for differentiating aCLL from classic CLL and the clinical significance of aCLL is still under debate. This review summarizes the current state of knowledge on the morphological, immunophenotypic, and genetic abnormalities of aCLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

BM trephine biopsy showed SLL infiltration (72%). BM aspiration and trephine biopsy confirmed diagnosis of SLL/CLL (Figure 2(G-I)). Chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is a B-cell malignancy characterized by monoclonal production of small, mature-appearing lymphocytes in the blood, the marrow and lymphoid tissue [[1]]. However, histopathological analysis of the heart biopsy and BM trephine biopsy indicated a diagnosis of SLL (Figure 2). [Extracted from the article]

Cardiac involvement of chronic lymphocytic leukemia/small lymphocytic lymphoma (CLL/SLL) is recognized extremely rarely. In addition, most CLL/SLL patients with heart infiltration are asymptomatic. In this review, we present the results of a literature search for English language articles concerning CLL/SLL or Richter transformation with symptomatic cardiac involvement. In total, 18 well-described cases with CLL/SLL and heart infiltration were identified. Only three patients were not diagnosed with CLL/SLL before the cardiac manifestation. In other patients, cardiac CLL/SLL was diagnosed between 5 months and 20 years from CLL/SLL diagnosis. All patients in these series had a diagnosis of secondary cardiac CLL/SLL. In addition, we identified four reported cases with Richter transformation in the heart. The treatment of patients with CLL/SLL and cardiac infiltration is variable and depends on the previous history and clinical characteristics of heart infiltration. In addition, no recommendations exist on how to treat patients with CLL/SLL and cardiac involvement. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Efficacy and safety of obinutuzumab combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (G-FC) or bendamustine (BG) in relapsed or refractory CLL patients followed by maintenance therapy with obinutuzumab for responding patients. This regimen was also investigated in a phase 2 study with 78 RR CLL patients, including 22 patients with fludarabine-refractory disease (28.2%) and 14 patients (17.9%) with deletion of chromosome 17p (del(17p)) [[5]]. Before the introduction of targeted drugs, chemoimmunotherapy with anti-CD20 monoclonal antibodies (MoAb), rituximab or obinutuzumab (GA101) was considered the treatment of choice in treatment naïve (TN) and relapsed/refractory (RR) patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) [[1]]. Bendamustine combined with rituximab in patients with relapsed and/or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia: a multicenter phase II trial of the german chronic lymphocytic leukemia study group. [Extracted from the article]

Genomic abnormalities, including del(17p)/TP53 mutation, del(11q), unmutated IGHV, and mutations in BIRC3, NOTCH1, SF3B1, and XPO1 predict poor outcomes with chemoimmunotherapy in chronic lymphocytic leukemia. To better understand the impact of these high-risk genomic features on outcomes with first-line ibrutinib-based therapy, we performed pooled analysis of two phase 3 studies with 498 patients randomized to receive ibrutinib- or chlorambucil-based therapy with median follow-up of 49.1 months. Ibrutinib-based therapy improved overall response rates (ORRs), complete response rates, and progression-free survival (PFS) versus chlorambucil-based therapy across all subgroups. In ibrutinib-randomized patients with versus without specified genomic features, ORR and PFS were comparable across subgroups. PFS hazard ratio (95% CI) for del(17p)/TP53 mutated/BIRC3 mutated: 1.05 (0.54–2.04); del(17p)/TP53 mutation, del(11q), and/or unmutated IGHV: 1.11 (0.69–1.77); unmutated IGHV: 1.79 (0.99–3.24); and NOTCH1 mutated 1.05 (0.65–1.69). This integrated analysis demonstrated efficacy of first-line ibrutinib-based treatment irrespective of cytogenetic and mutational risk features. Registered at ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT01722487 and NCT02264574). [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The use of Bruton's tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibitors has changed the management of patients with B-cell lymphoid malignancies. BTK is an important molecule that interconnects B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) signaling. BTK inhibitors (BTKis) are classified into three categories, namely covalent irreversible inhibitors, covalent reversible inhibitors, and non-covalent reversible inhibitors. Ibrutinib is the first covalent, irreversible BTK inhibitor approved in 2013 as a breakthrough therapy for chronic lymphocytic leukemia patients. Subsequently, two other covalent, irreversible, second-generation BTKis, acalabrutinib and zanubrutinib, have been developed for lymphoid malignancies to reduce the ibrutinib-mediated adverse effects. More recently, irreversible and reversible BTKis have been under development for immune-mediated diseases, including autoimmune hemolytic anemia, immune thrombocytopenia, multiple sclerosis, pemphigus vulgaris, atopic dermatitis, rheumatoid arthritis, systemic lupus erythematosus, Sjögren's disease, and chronic spontaneous urticaria, among others. This review article summarizes the preclinical and clinical evidence supporting the role of BTKis in various autoimmune, allergic, and inflammatory conditions. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Recently, the use of novel targeted drugs has changed the treatment paradigms in chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Among the several drugs used for the management of relapsed/refractory (R/R) CLL, Bruton tyrosine kinase inhibitors (ibrutinib and acalabrutinib), phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase inhibitors (idelalisib and duvelisib), B-cell lymphoma 2 inhibitor (venetoclax), and novel CD20 monoclonal antibodies have demonstrated the greatest improvements in survival among R/R CLL patients. However, patients with relapsed but asymptomatic CLL do not need immediate alternative treatment and should be observed until evident sign of progression. Among available approved treatments, venetoclax + rituximab for 24 months or ibrutinib as continuous therapy is recommended. Another, less recommended, option is idelalisib in combination with rituximab. The correct treatment selection depends on the type of prior therapy, response to previous treatment and side effects, presence of comorbidities, and the risk of drug toxicity. Allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and investigational therapies such as chimeric antigen receptor-T-cell therapy are promising treatment options for high-risk patients, including those progressing after 1 or more targeted therapies. The present review discusses current treatment strategies for patients with R/R CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: The misbalance between a family of inhibitor of apoptosis proteins (IAP), regulated by the nuclear factor kappa B (NF-κB) and their natural antagonist second mitochondrial-derived activator of caspases/direct IAP binding protein with low pI (Smac/DIABLO) are important to biology of acute myeloid leukemia (AML).Material and Methods: The aim of the study was to assess NF-κB and Smac/DIABLO proteins expression in blasts of 109 newly diagnosed AML patients using the multicolor flow cytometry and evaluate their influence on AML patients outcome.Results: Expression of NF-κB and of Smac/DIABLO proteins were found in 95% and 98% of the patients, respectively. A negative correlation between Smac/DIABLO and NF-κB was observed. Age < 60 years old as well as higher Smac/DIABLO expression were associated with a higher probability of complete response achievement in the multivariate analysis. Longer overall survival (OS) in the univariate and multivariate analyses was influenced by age < 60 years old, a favorable or intermediate-risk karyotype and high Smac/DIABLO expression. Additionally, in the survival analysis of the subgroups, the patients aged < 60 years old, with high Smac/DIABLO expression, lower NF-κB expression and < 50% of bone marrow blasts who were treated with standard treatment had better OS.Conclusions: Lower NF-κB and higher Smac/DIABLO expression may influence AML patients outcome. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The Complement 1 trial investigated the efficacy and safety of ofatumumab + chlorambucil with chlorambucil monotherapy in patients with previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL). On long‐term follow‐up in the chemoimmunotherapy arm vs. the chemotherapy arm there was an estimated 12% (not significant) and 39% risk reduction in overall survival and progression‐free survival, respectively. A high rate (61%) of treatment with next‐line therapies in both the treatment arms may dilute any potential OS difference and confound the interpretation of the OS results. Addition of ofatumumab to chlorambucil demonstrated clinical benefit and tolerability as a frontline treatment option in patients unfit for fludarabine‐containing therapy, with no new safety concerns. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We present the results of a prospective, non-randomized phase 2 trial in which 253 AML patients (pts) under 60 years old received DAC (Daunorubicin + AraC + Cladribine) as first induction followed by CLAM (Cladribine + AraC + Mitoxantrone) as early second induction on day 16 based on bone marrow (BM) blasts on day 14 (D14). The CR/CRi rate after a single course of DAC was 83% for pts with D14 BM blasts less than 10%. Forty-six pts had >10% BM blasts on D14, of whom 35 received CLAM with rates of CR/CRi 60% and early death (ED) 23%. The remaining 11 pts were not fit to receive CLAM, with rates of CR/CRi 28%, PR 18%, and ED 18%. Median OS was 7.2 versus 7.5 months, respectively. The overall CR/CRi rate was 77% after the first induction, with final CR/CRi rate 80% after DAC reinduction for pts who achieved PR with initial DAC course. CLAM used as early second induction might improve CR/CRi rates for younger AML pts with poor early response to DAC induction, but may be associated with higher mortality. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Management of patients with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) depends on the age and fitness of the patient. For younger patients, the commonly accepted standard of care is a high-dose cytarabine-based induction chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT). In newly diagnosed patients with MCL ineligible for intensive therapy and ASCT, the standard-of-care has generally been R-CHOP (rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone), followed by rituximab, maintenance. In recent years, bendamustine-based therapy has been increasingly adopted for older MCL patients and more recently, vincristine has been replaced by bortezomib in the R-CHOP combination as VR-CAP for previously untreated patients. Novel targeted agents now offer more promise than traditional chemotherapy or immunochemotherapy for both previously treated and untreated disease, and should also improve outcomes for older MCL patients. Here, we review standard therapies currently in use and novel agents that may soon be available for MCL patients and particularly for those unsuitable for ASCT. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Bortezomib is a dipeptidyl boronic acid that selectively inhibits the ubiquitin proteasome pathway, which plays a role in the degradation of many intracellular proteins. It is the first-in-class selective and reversible inhibitor of the 26S proteasome, with antiproliferative and antitumor activity. It exerts its anti-neoplastic action mainly via the inhibition of the nuclear factor-κB pathway components associated with cell proliferation, apoptosis, and angiogenesis. The drug has revolutionized the treatment of multiple myeloma and, more recently, mantle cell lymphoma. In 2003, bortezomib received accelerated approval from the US Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and in 2008 for patients with previously untreated multiple myeloma. In 2006, bortezomib was approved for the treatment of refractory/relapsed mantle cell lymphoma and, in 2014, for previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma. Bortezomib has also demonstrated clinical efficacy both as a single drug and in combination with other agents in light chain amyloidosis, lymphoplasmacytic lymphoma/Waldenstrom macroglobulinemia, and peripheral T-cell lymphomas. Furthermore, continued clinical studies are required to confirm its value for patients with indolent and aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphomas and acute leukemias. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Antibody-drug conjugates are monoclonal antibodies attached to biologically active drugs through chemical linkers that deliver and release cytotoxic agents at the tumor site, reducing the likelihood of systemic exposure and therefore toxicity. Currently, there are about 110 ongoing studies implementing antibody-drug conjugates in the treatment of multiple human malignancies. Antibody-drug conjugates carry a feature of the specificity of a monoclonal antibody and the anti-neoplastic potential of a cytotoxin. The first antibody-drug conjugate was approved in 2001, and the field of antibody-drug conjugates has expanded since then with three more antibody-drug conjugates being added to the market. The complex structure of the antibody-drug conjugate poses a challenge in designing a clinically adequate molecule. Antibody-drug conjugates are usually well tolerated with some predictable adverse reactions, as well as new medical issues, that need careful approach. This review provides an outline of the current status of the efficacy and safety of antibody-drug conjugates in malignant diseases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The pivotal LYM-3002 study compared frontline rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) with bortezomib, rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin and prednisone (VR-CAP) in newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients for whom stem cell transplantation was not an option. This post hoc subanalysis of the VR-CAP data from LYM-3002 evaluated the effect of bortezomib dose intensity on OS in patients who completed ≥6 cycles of treatment. From the end of cycle 6, patients receiving ≥4.6 mg/m2/cycle of bortezomib had significantly longer OS (but not PFS) compared with those receiving <4.6 mg/m2/cycle by univariate analysis (HR 0.43 [95% CI: 0.23-0.80]; p = .0059). This association remained significant in multivariate analysis adjusting for baseline patient and disease characteristics (HR 0.40 [95% CI: 0.20-0.79]; p = .008]. Higher bortezomib dose intensity was the strongest predictor of OS in newly diagnosed MCL patients receiving VR-CAP. Clinicaltrials.gov identifier: NCT00722137. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: In the LYM-3002 study, the efficacy and safety of frontline bortezomib plus rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and prednisone (VR-CAP) and rituximab, cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine, and prednisone (R-CHOP) were compared in transplant-ineligible patients with untreated, newly diagnosed, mantle cell lymphoma. We report the final overall survival and safety outcomes for patients in the long-term follow-up phase after the primary progression-free-survival endpoint was met.Methods: LYM-3002 was a randomised, open-label, phase 3 study done at 128 clinical centres in 28 countries in Asia, Europe, North America, and South America. Adult patients with confirmed stage II-IV previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status score of 2 or less, who were ineligible for bone marrow transplantation, were randomly assigned (1:1) to receive six or eight 21-day cycles of VR-CAP (intravenous rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, and bortezomib 1·3 mg/m2, plus oral prednisone 100 mg/m2) or R-CHOP (intravenous vincristine 1·4 mg/m2 [2 mg maximum], rituximab 375 mg/m2, cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, and doxorubicin 50 mg/m2, plus oral prednisone 100 mg/m2). Randomisation was done according to a computer-generated randomisation schedule prepared by the sponsor; permuted blocks central randomisation was used (block size of 4), and was stratified by International Prognostic Index score and disease stage at diagnosis. The primary endpoint of this final analysis was overall survival, which was analysed in the intention-to-treat population. This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00722137, and is closed to new participants with follow-up completed.Findings: Between May 22, 2008, and Dec 5, 2011, 487 patients were enrolled and randomly assigned. 268 patients (140 in the VR-CAP group and 128 in the R-CHOP group) were included in the follow-up analysis, which included patients with data available after the primary analysis clinical cutoff date of Dec 2, 2013. After median follow-up of 82·0 months (IQR 74·1-94·2), median overall survival was significantly longer in the VR-CAP group than in the R-CHOP group (90·7 months [95% CI 71·4 to not estimable] vs 55·7 months [47·2 to 68·9]; hazard ratio 0·66 [95% CI 0·51-0·85]; p=0·001). Three new adverse events were reported since the primary analysis cutoff (one each of grade 4 lung adenocarcinoma and grade 4 gastric cancer in the VR-CAP group, and one case of grade 2 pneumonia in the R-CHOP group). 103 (42%) of 243 patients in the VR-CAP group, and 138 (57%) of 244 in the R-CHOP group died; the most common cause of death was progressive disease.Interpretations: Compared with R-CHOP, VR-CAP was associated with significantly longer survival, and had a manageable and expected safety profile. Our results support further assessment of VR-CAP in patients with previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma.Funding: Janssen Research & Development. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Simple Summary: Leukemia cutis occurs in different types of leukemia, most commonly in chronic lymphocytic leukemia and acute myeloid leukemia. Its varied clinical appearance makes it difficult to differentiate from other skin lesions. The leukemic skin changes are localized or disseminated and can be located in any site of the body. The diagnosis is mainly based on the clinical characteristics and histopathologic, as well as immunophenotypic features of the skin lesions. The treatment of leukemia cutis depends on the specific diagnosis of hematologic malignancy and is aimed at eradicating the primary underlying disease. Local irradiation for skin lesions is sometimes useful for palliative treatment. Leukemia cutis (LC) is defined as the leukemic infiltration of the epidermis, the dermis, and the subcutaneous tissue. Leukemia cutis may follow or occur simultaneously with the diagnosis of systemic leukemia. However, cutaneous lesions are occasionally diagnosed as the primary manifestation of leukemia. Leukemic skin infiltrations demonstrate considerable variation regarding a number of changes, distribution, and morphology. The highest incidence of LC is observed in chronic lymphocytic leukemia, monocytic and myelomonocytic acute myeloid leukemia, and T-cell lineage leukemia. Although the pathogenic mechanism of the invasion of leukemic cells into the skin is not well understood, chemokine receptors and adhesion molecules as well as the genetic characteristics of leukemia are thought to play a role. Leukemic skin lesions may be localized or disseminated and may occur alone or in combination on any site of the skin, most frequently in the trunk and extremities. The most common clinical presentations of leukemia cutis are papules, nodules, macules, plaques, and ulcers. In most patients, the complete or partial resolution of cutaneous infiltrations occurs simultaneously with hematologic remission. However, in patients with resistant disease or recurrent skin infiltration, local radiotherapy can be used. This review presents recent data on the pathogenesis, diagnosis, and treatment of leukemic skin involvement in different types of leukemia. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Ibrutinib and idelalisib, B-cell receptor (BCR) signaling pathway inhibitors, have been recently approved for use against relapsed/refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). To assess the efficacy and safety of BCR pathway inhibitors in relapsed/refractory CLL, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of five randomized controlled trials (1866 patients). Our study demonstrated that BCR pathway inhibitors significantly prolonged progression-free survival (PFS; pooled HR = 0.24; 95% CI: 0.19-0.30) and overall survival (HR = 0.58; 0.46-0.73) compared with control treatment. BCR pathway inhibitors increased the probability of response (RR = 3.54; 95% CI: 1.69-7.41) and decreased the risk of progression (RR = 0.21, 95% CI: 0.13-0.34). However, BCR pathway inhibitors increased the risk of grade 3 and 4 adverse events (AEs; RR = 1.25; 95% CI: 1.08-1.44) and serious AEs (RR = 1.32; 95% CI: 1.17-1.50). AEs causing discontinuation (RR = 1.26; 95% CI: 0.88-1.81) or death (RR = 1.06; 95% CI: 0.72-1.57) were not significantly increased. No statistically significant difference in any aspect of meta-analysis was noted between ibrutinib and idelalisib. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract: Objectives: PALG CLL4 is the first, randomized, phase IIIb study with rituximab, cladribine, and cyclophosphamide (RCC) induction and subsequent maintenance with rituximab in previously untreated chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients. Methods: The induction treatment consisted of 6 RCC cycles regimen. Patients with complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) after an induction phase were randomized into a maintenance arm with rituximab or an observational arm. Results: In the intention‐to‐treat population, 97 patients completed the induction phase with an overall response rate (ORR) of 73.2% (CR 22.7%, PR 50.5%). Subsequently, 66 patients were randomized into the rituximab maintenance arm (n = 33) or the observational arm (n = 33). CR rates were 57.1% in the maintenance group vs 50% in the observational group. PFS was significantly longer in the rituximab maintenance vs the observational arm (P = .028). The multivariate Cox model indicated that del17p (P = .006) and elevated beta‐2‐microglobulin (P = .015) significantly increased the hazard ratio (HR) of progression, whereas the presence of CD38 (P = .013) significantly decreased it; maintenance therapy with rituximab (P < .0001) significantly decreased the HR of disease progression. Conclusions: The study confirmed the high efficacy and acceptable safety profile of induction therapy with RCC and maintenance therapy with rituximab in previously untreated patients with CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) is an incurable disease. Quality of life during treatment and periods of subsequent remission is therefore vital. Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) was compared in relapsed CLL during and after treatment with ofatumumab combined with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide versus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide alone. The European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) QLQ-C30 v3 and QLQ-CLL16 were used to assess HRQoL in this open-label, phase 3 study. Improvements in prespecified domains of patient-reported outcomes (Global Health Status [GHS]/HRQoL and B symptom scores) were recorded in both treatment arms after three cycles and were sustained after 18 months of follow-up. The two treatment arms were not significantly different at the nominal 0.05 level for GHS/HRQoL (p = .7278) or B symptoms (p = .5968). Small improvements in quality of life were maintained after therapy. The addition of ofatumumab was without any adverse impact on HRQoL (NCT00824265). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

In this multicenter, open-label, phase III study, patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) were randomized (1:1) to receive ofatumumab plus fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (OFA + FC) or FC alone; the primary endpoint being progression-free survival (PFS) assessed by an independent review committee (IRC). Between March 2009 and January 2012, 365 patients were randomized (OFA + FC:n = 183; FC:n = 182). Median IRC-assessed PFS was 28.9 months with OFA + FC versus 18.8 months with FC (hazard ratio = 0.67; 95% confidence interval, 0.51–0.88;p = .0032). Grade ≥3 adverse events (≤60 days after last dose) were reported in 134 (74%) OFA + FC-treated patients compared with 123 (69%) FC-treated patients. Of these, neutropenia was the most common (89 [49%] vs. 64 [36%]). OFA + FC improved PFS with manageable safety for patients with relapsed CLL compared with FC alone, thus providing an alternative treatment option for patients with relapsed CLL. Trial registration:www.clinicaltrials.gov(NCT00824265). [ABSTRACT FROM PUBLISHER]

Otlertuzumab ( TRU-016) is a humanized anti- CD37 protein therapeutic that triggers direct caspase-independent apoptosis of malignant B cells and induces antibody-dependent cell-mediated cytotoxicity. Patients with relapsed chronic lymphocytic leukaemia ( CLL) received either otlertuzumab (20 mg/kg) weekly by IV infusion for two 28-day cycles then every 14 days for four 28-day cycles and IV bendamustine (70 mg/m2) on Days 1 and 2 of each cycle for up to six 28-day cycles or bendamustine alone. Thirty-two patients were treated with otlertuzumab and bendamustine and 33 with bendamustine alone. Overall response rate according to the International Workshop on Chronic Lymphocytic Leukaemia criteria was 69% in the otlertuzumab and bendamustine arm and 39% in the bendamustine alone arm ( P = 0·025). Median progression-free survival ( PFS) was 15·9 months in the otlertuzumab and bendamustine arm and 10·2 months in the bendamustine alone arm ( P = 0·0192). There was a higher incidence of pyrexia (34% vs. 12%) and neutropenia (59% vs. 39%) with the combination but this did not result in a higher incidence of severe (grade 3/4) infections (13% vs. 27%). This combination significantly increased the response rate and prolonged the PFS over single agent bendamustine in patients with relapsed or refractory CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The antibody-drug conjugate (ADC) is a combination of a cytotoxic agent and monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) through a stable specialized chemical linker. After ADC binds to the target antigen, the conjugate is internalized and toxin is released, leading to the death of a target cell. Lorvotuzumab mertansine, indatuximab ravtansine, and milatuzumab-doxorubicin are currently under clinical development for use in multiple myeloma (MM). Preliminary data from recent studies indicate that these agents induce responses in patients with relapsed and/or refractory MM and have an acceptable safety profile. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Treatment for patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who are elderly or who have comorbidities is challenging because fludarabine-based chemoimmunotherapies are mostly not suitable. Chlorambucil remains the standard of care in many countries. We aimed to investigate whether the addition of ofatumumab to chlorambucil could lead to better clinical outcomes than does treatment with chlorambucil alone, while also being tolerable for patients who have few treatment options. Methods We carried out a randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial for treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia in 109 centres in 16 countries. We included patients who had active disease needing treatment, but in whom fludarabine-based treatment was not possible. We randomly assigned patients (1:1) to receive oral chlorambucil (10 mg/m2) on days 1–7 of a 28 day treatment course or to receive chlorambucil by this schedule plus intravenous ofatumumab (cycle 1: 300 mg on day 1 and 1000 mg on day 8; subsequent cycles: 1000 mg on day 1) for three to 12 cycles. Assignment was done with a randomisation list that was computer generated at GlaxoSmithKline, and was stratified, in a block size of two, by age, disease stage, and performance status. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival in the intention-to-treat population and assessment was done by an independent review committee that was masked to group assignment. The study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT00748189. Findings We enrolled 447 patients, median age 69 years (range 35–92). Between Dec 22, 2008, and May 26, 2011, we randomly assigned 221 patients to chlorambucil plus ofatumumab and 226 patients to chlorambucil alone. Median progression-free survival was 22·4 months (95% CI 19·0–25·2) in the group assigned to chlorambucil plus ofatumumab compared with 13·1 months (10·6–13·8) in the group assigned to chlorambucil only (hazard ratio 0·57, 95% CI 0·45–0·72; p<0·0001). Grade 3 or greater adverse events were more common in the chlorambucil plus ofatumumab group (109 [50%] patients; vs 98 [43%] given chlorambucil alone), with neutropenia being the most common event (56 [26%] vs 32 [14%]). Grade 3 or greater infections had similar frequency in both groups. Grade 3 or greater infusion-related adverse events were reported in 22 (10%) patients given chlorambucil plus ofatumumab. Five (2%) patients died during treatment in each group. Interpretation Addition of ofatumumab to chlorambucil led to clinically important improvements with a manageable side-effect profile in treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukaemia who were elderly or had comorbidities. Chlorambucil plus ofatumumab is therefore an important treatment option for these patients who cannot tolerate more intensive therapy. INSET: Panel: Research in context.. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The article discusses a clinical trial which examined the effectiveness of bortezomib-based therapy in improving outcomes in patients with newly diagnosed mantle-cell lymphoma. Topics discussed include the replacement of vincristine with bortezomib in the frontline therapy which include rituximab, cyclophosphamide, prednisone and doxorubicin, the safety of the bortezomib-based therapy, and an increase in the incidence of thrombocytopenia and neutropenia.

Long-term outcomes following newer therapies for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) have rarely been reported. This article presents the results of the final analysis of the Polish Adult Leukemia Group PALG-CLL2 study performed 10 years from final patient enrollment. With the extended follow-up time, it was found that cladribine (2-CdA)-based combinations CMC (2-CdA, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone) and CC (2-CdA, cyclophosphamide) administered as first-line treatment of progressive CLL resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival, but similar overall survival compared to 2-CdA monotherapy. Furthermore, the risk of potentially fatal late adverse events including infections, autoimmune complications and, particularly, secondary neoplasms was comparable among patients treated with CMC, CC or 2-CdA. The results of our analysis support the importance of long-term outcome monitoring of randomized trials in CLL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Normal B lymphocytes receive signals from B-cell antigen receptor (BCR) that are triggered by binding of the BCR to an external antigen. Tonic signaling through the BCR provides growth and signals to chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) cells, and plays an important role in the pathogenesis and progression of the disease. Antigen engagement of BCR is followed by intracellular recruitment and activation of BCR-associated kinases including spleen tyrosine kinase (Syk), Bruton's tyrosine kinase (Btk) and phosphatidylinositol 3-kinases (PI3K). Inhibition of signaling pathways downstream of the BCR induces disruption of chemokine-mediated CLL cell migration and cell killing. BCR signal transduction inhibitors represent a promising new strategy for targeted CLL treatment. A number of therapeutic agents have recently been developed with significant activity in CLL. The compounds that are currently investigated in patients with CLL include ibrutinib -inhibitor of Btk, fostamatinib-inhibitor of Syk and idelalisib (GS-1101) -a specific isoform of the PI3K (PI3K) inhibitor. The clinical activity of ibrutinib, GS-1101 and fostamatinib in patients with CLL is associated with marked lymphocytosis due to release of tumor cells from the lymph nodes into the peripheral blood. Further studies are ongoing with single agents and their combinations with other targeted and conventional therapies. This article will review the preclinical rationale of BCR signaling inhibitors in the treatment of CLL, and the clinical evidence supporting the use of these agents in CLL patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives The relationship between treatments of chronic lymphocytic leukemia ( CLL) with cladribine (2-CdA) or chlorambucil and immune thrombocytopenia ( IT) has not been yet determined. Methods The records of 777 patients in two randomized Polish Adult Leukemia Group ( PALG)- CLL programs treated with these agents were retrospectively analyzed. Results Immune thrombocytopenia occurred in 55 of 777 (7.1%) patients. No significant differences in IT prevalence were seen between patients on chlorambucil or 2-CdA-based regiments ( P = 0.33). IT developed at a median time of 0.499 yr (0.06-4.8) from the start of CLL therapy. This time was significantly longer in patients treated with chlorambucil (2.03 yr, 95% CI: 0.06-4.22) in relation to patients treated with 2-CdA-based regiments (0.52 yr, 95% CI: 0.34-0.69, P = 0.049). Overall survival ( OS) of patients with IT and those without IT were similar (2.65 yr vs. 3.2 yr P = 0.23) but the severity of bleeding was more pronounced in the 2-CdA group. The responses to IT therapy were 35%, 54% and 75% for steroids, chemotherapy and splenectomy, respectively. Conclusions In this study, an unexpectedly high percentage of IT incidence was demonstrated in patients with CLL requiring chemotherapy. Although no marked differences were seen in IT frequency in patients treated with 2-CdA-based regiments compared to chlorambucil regimen, the clinical course of hemorrhagic diathesis was more severe in 2-CdA group. Also, the time elapsed from study screening to IT diagnosis was significantly shorter in the 2-CdA group than in the chlorambucil group suggesting a causative relationship. The appearance of IT did not influence the median time of OS. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) patients are at high risk for infections. The pathogenesis of infection in patients with this leukemia is complex and multifactorial. Patients with CLL have a number of immune system defects, including disordered B-cell function with decreased production of normal B-cells and abnormal production of immunoglobulins, suppressed T-cell function and neutropenia. Other immune abnormalities present in CLL patients include neutrophil dysfunction, and complement deficiencies. In addition, further perturbations in immune function are related to the antileukemic therapies. Immune disturbance might be common prior to CLL diagnosis and infectious agents could trigger CLL development. Current chemotherapy-based regimens are not curative and often worsen this immune suppression. The introduction of new effective therapeutic agents such as the purine analogues and monoclonal antibodies has influenced the spectrum of infections diagnosed in CLL patients. Some conditions increase the risk for the development of infections including advanced age, decreased levels of immunoglobulins, advanced Binet stage, neutropenia and treatment with more than one line of chemotherapy. Until now it is debatable whether and when antibacterial prophylaxis could be useful in CLL patients. The prevention of infection includes antimicrobial prophylaxis, as well as immunoglobulin replacement and vaccination. Antibacterial prophylaxis should be given to CLL patients with previous severe and/or relapsing bacterial infections. This article reviews the immune defects in CLL and discusses strategies aimed at prophylaxis and treatment of infections in patients with CLL [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Rozrolimupab, a recombinant mixture of 25 fully human RhD-specific monoclonal antibodies, represents a new class of recombinant human antibody mixtures. In a phase 1 or 2 dose escalation study, RhD+ patients (61 subjects) with primary immune thrombocytopenia received a single intravenous dose of rozrolimupab ranging from 75 to 300 n-g/kg. The pri-mary outcome was the occurrence of adverse events. The principal secondary outcome was the effect on platelet levels 7 days after the treatment. The most com-mon adverse events were headache and pyrexia, mostly mild, and reported in 20% and 13% of the patients, respectively, without dose relationship. Rozrolimupab caused an expected transient reduction of hemoglobin concentration in the majority of the patients. At the dose of 300 |jig/kg plate-let responses, defined as platelet count > 30 x 109/L and an increase in platelet count by > 20 x 109/L from baseline were observed after 72 hours and persisted for at least 7 days in 8 of 13 patients (62%). Platelet responses were observed within 24 hours in 23% of patients and lasted for a median of 14 days. Rozrolimupab was well tolerated and elicited rapid platelet responses in patients with immune throm-bocytopenia and may be a useful alterna-tive to plasma-derived products. This trial is registered at www.cllnicaltrials.gov as #NCT00718692. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Hairy cell leukemia variant (HCL-V) is now included in the World Health Organization (WHO) classification as a provisional entity and is no longer considered to be biologically related to classic HCL (HCL-C). The clinical course of HCL-V is variable but usually more aggressive, and the median survival of patients with HCL-V is significantly shorter than that of HCL-C. The therapeutic approach to HCL-V is still debated. Various treatment approaches active in HCL-C achieve partial response (PR) or no response in HCL-V, and remission is usually shorter than in HCL-C. In addition, HCL-V seems to be resistant to therapeutic modalities usually highly effective in the treatment of HCL-C. Cladribine (2-CdA) is significantly less active in HCL-V than in HCL-C. In addition, the majority of patients with HCL-V require more than one cycle of 2-CdA to maintain PR. Patients with HCL-V treated with pentostatin also have a poorer clinical outcome and a lower response rate than those of patients with HCL-C. Recently, some reports indicate that monoclonal antibodies, rituximab and alemtuzumab, are active in HCL-V. Promising results have also been obtained with anti-CD22 immunotoxin, BL22. A new generation of CD22-specific immunotoxins, moxetumomab pasudotox (CAT-8015, HA22), highly active in refractory/relapsed HCL-C, also need clinical investigation in HCL-V. Currently, immunochemotherapy with rituximab and purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs) should be considered as the treatment of choice in previously untreated patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Intravenous immunoglobulin (IVIg) has an established role in the treatment of immune thrombocytopenia (ITP). The safety and efficacy of a new ready-to-use IVIg 10% formulation (octagam® 10%) were investigated in a prospective phase III study in 116 adult patients with ITP (platelet count ≤20×109/l). Sixty-six patients had chronic ITP and 49 were newly diagnosed. Patients received octagam 10% 1 g/kg/day on two consecutive days; infusion rate was adjusted according to tolerability to a maximum of 0·12 ml/kg/minute. Eighty per cent of patients attained the primary efficacy endpoint of clinical response (platelet count ≥50×109/l within 6 days of dosing). The median time to response was 2 days and the median duration of response was 12 days; mean response duration was 24·1 days. octagam 10% was well tolerated and effective in this population representative of adult patients with ITP, even at the maximum infusion rate of 0·12 ml/kg/minute, without unexpected safety issues. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is the most common adult leukaemia in Europe andNorth America. The disease is characterized by proliferation and accumulation of small CD5+ B cells in blood, lymph nodes, spleen, liver and bonemarrow. The natural clinical course of CLL is highly variable, and chemotherapy is usually not indicated in early and stable disease. However, patients with progressive and more advanced CLL require treatment. For many years, chlorambucil with or without corticosteroids was used in previously untreated patients with CLL. More recently, purine nucleoside analogues (PNAs) [fludarabine, cladribine and pentostatin] have been included in treatment approaches for this disease, and chlorambucil is no longer the leading standard everywhere. Currently, this drug is rather recommended for the treatment of older, unfit patients with co-morbidities, especially in European countries. Significantly higher overall response (OR) and complete response (CR) rates in patients treated initially with PNAs than in those treated with chlorambucil or cyclophosphamide-based combination regimens have been confirmed in randomized, prospective, multicentre trials. Moreover, PNAs administered in combination with cyclophosphamide produce higher response rates, including CR and molecular CR, compared with PNA as monotherapy. Recent reports suggest that the administration of monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) can significantly improve the course of CLL. At present, two mAbs have the most important clinical value in patients with CLL. The first is rituximab, a human mouse antibody that targets CD20 antigens, and the second is alemtuzumab, a humanized form of a rat antibody active against CD52. Several recent reports suggest that in patients with CLL, rituximab combined with a PNA can increase the OR and CR rates compared with PNA or rituximab alone, with acceptable toxicity. In randomized trials, the combination of rituximab with fludarabine and cyclophosphamide (FC-R regimen) demonstrated higher rates of OR, CR and progression-free survival in patients with previously untreated and relapsed or refractory CLL than fludarabine plus cyclophosphamide (FC regimen). Several reports have confirmed significant activity with alemtuzumab in relapsed or refractory CLL, as well as in previously untreated patients. Recently, several new agents have been investigated and have shown promise in treating patients with CLL. These treatments include new mAbs, agents targeting the antiapoptotic bcl-2 family of proteins and receptors involved in mediating survival signals from the microenvironment, antisense oligonucleotides and other agents. The most promising are new mAbs directed against the CD20 molecule, lumiliximab and anti-CD40 mAbs. Oblimersen, alvocidib (flavopiridol) and lenalidomide are also being evaluated both in preclinical studies and in early clinical trials. In recent years, a significant improvement in haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) procedures in patients with high-risk CLL has been observed. However, the exact role ofHSCT, autologous or allogeneic, in the standard management of CLL patients is still undefined. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

For the past few years more and more new cytotoxic agents active in the treatment of hematological malignancies have been synthesized and become available for either in vitro studies or clinical trials. Among them the class of antineoplastic drugs belonging to the purine nucleoside analogues group (PNAs) plays an important role. Three of them: pentostatin (DCF), cladribine (2-CdA) and fludarabine (FA) were approved by Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the treatment of hematological malignancies. Recently three novel PNAs: clofarabine (CAFdA), nelarabine (ara-G) and forodesine (immucillin H, BCX-1777) have been synthesized and introduced into preclinical studies and clinical trials. These agents seem to be useful mainly for the treatment of human T-cell proliferative disorders and they are currently undergoing clinical trials in lymphoid malignancies. However, there are also several studies suggesting the role of these drugs in B-cell malignancies. This review will summarize current knowledge concerning the mechanism of action, pharmacologic properties, clinical activity and toxicity of PNAs accepted for use in clinical practice, as well as new agents available for clinical trials. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML) is a clonal disease characterized by the proliferation and accumulation of myeloid progenitor cells in the bone marrow, which ultimately leads to hematopoietic failure. The incidence of AML increases with age, and older patients typically have worse treatment outcomes than do younger patients. Objective: This review is focused on current and emerging treatment strategies for nonpromyelocytic AML in patients aged <60 years. Methods: A literature review was conducted of the PubMed database for articles published in English. Publications from 1990 through March 2009 were scrutinized, and the search was updated on August 26, 2009. The search terms used were: acute myeloid leukemia in conjunction with treatment, chemotherapy, stem cell transplantation, and immunotherapy. Clinical trials including adults with AML aged ≥19 years were selected for analysis. Conference proceedings from the previous 5 years of The American Society of Hematology, The European Hematology Association, and The American Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation were searched manually. Additional relevant publications were obtained by reviewing the references from the chosen articles. Results: Cytarabine (AraC) is the cornerstone of induction therapy and consolidation therapy for AML. A standard form of induction therapy consists of AraC (100–200 mg/m2), administered by a continuous infusion for 7 days, combined with an anthracycline, administered intravenously for 3 days. Consolidation therapy comprises treatment with additional courses of intensive chemotherapy after the patient has achieved a complete remission (CR), usually with higher doses of the same drugs as were used during the induction period. High-dose AraC (2–3 g/m2) is now a standard consolidation therapy for patients aged <60 years. Despite substantial progress in the treatment of newly diagnosed AML, 20% to 40% of patients do not achieve remission with the standard induction chemotherapy, and 50% to 70% of first CR patients are expected to relapse within 3 years. The optimum strategy at the time of relapse, or for patients with the resistant disease, remains uncertain. Allogeneic stem cell transplantation has been established as the most effective form of antileukemic therapy in patients with AML in first or subsequent remission. New drugs are being evaluated in clinical studies, including immunotoxins, monoclonal antibodies, nucleoside analogues, hypomethylating agents, farnesyltransferase inhibitors, alkylating agents, FMS-like tyrosine kinase 3 inhibitors, and multidrug-resistant modulators. However, determining the success of these treatment strategies ultimately requires well-designed clinical trials, based on stratification of the patient risk, knowledge of the individual disease, and the drug''s performance status. Conclusions: Combinations of AraC and anthracyclines are still the mainstay of induction therapy, and use of high-dose AraC is now a standard consolidation therapy in AML patients aged <60 years. Although several new agents have shown promise in treating AML, it is unlikely that these agents will be curative when administered as monotherapy; it is more likely that they will be used in combination with other new agents or with conventional therapy. [Copyright &y& Elsevier]

The article presents a study on the medical activity of cladribine combined with cyclophosphamide for chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL) with 17p13.1/ TP53 deletion. The study focuses on the efficacy and toxicity of 2-CdA with cyclophosphamide combination (CC regimen) on patients with previously untreated B-cell CLL with 17p13.1 deletion. Details about the study are included, concluding the relatively high response rate of CC regimen to the observed patients with a potential treatment efficacy.

The circulating endothelial cells (CEC) are proposed to be a noninvasive marker of angiogenesis. Recent data suggest that endothelial cells may enhance the survival and proliferation of leukemic blasts and mediate chemotherapy resistance in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We analyzed CEC count by the four-color flow cytometry in AML and healthy subjects. We evaluated the kinetics of mature CEC, both resting (rCEC) and activated (aCEC), as well as progenitor (CEPC) and apoptotic CEC (CECAnnV+) in AML patients treated with standard chemotherapy and their influence on response to treatment and overall survival. We found significantly higher numbers of aCEC, rCEC, CEPC, and CECAnnV+ in AML patients than in healthy controls. The elevated CEPC and absolute blood counts in peripheral blood as well as the low CECAnnV+ number were associated with higher probability of induction treatment failure. aCEC, rCEC, CEPC, and CECAnnV+ counts determined in complete remission (CR) were significantly lower than those found at diagnosis. In those CR patients, a significant decrease in the CEC count and increase in the number of CECAnnV+ were observed already 24h after the first dose of chemotherapy. In refractory AML, the aCEC, rCEC, CEPC, and CECAnnV+ counts assessed before and after induction chemotherapy did not differ significantly, and a significant decrease in CEC count and increase in CECAnnV+ number were noted only after the last dose of chemotherapy. The number of CEC is significantly higher in AML patients than in healthy subjects and correlates with response to treatment. The evaluation of CEC kinetics and apoptotic profile may be a promising tool to select AML patients with poor response to chemotherapy who may benefit from antiangiogenic therapies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives:  Patients with primary refractory AML and with early relapses have unfavorable prognoses and require innovative therapeutic approaches. Purine analogs fludarabine (FA) and cladribine (2-CdA) increase cytotoxic effect of Ara-C in leukemic blasts and inhibit DNA repair mechanisms; therefore its association with Ara-C and mitoxantrone (MIT) results in a synergistic effect. In the current report, we present the final results of multi-center phase II study evaluating the efficacy and toxicity of CLAG-M salvage regimen in poor risk refractory/relapsed AML patients. Methods:  The induction chemotherapy consisted of 2-CdA 5 mg/m2, Ara-C 2 g/m2, MIT 10 mg/m2, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor. In the case of PR, a second CLAG-M was administered. Patients in CR received consolidation courses based on high doses of Ara-C and MIT with or without 2-CdA. Results:  One hundred and eighteen patients from 11 centers were registered; 78 primary resistant and 40 relapsed. Sixty-six patients (58%) achieved CR after one or two courses of CLAG-M, 49 (35%) were refractory, and 8 (7%) died early. WBC >10 g/L and age >34 yr were factors associated with increased risk of treatment failure. Hematological toxicity was the most prominent toxicity of this regimen. The probability of OS at 4 yr was 14% (95% CI 4–23%). OS was influenced by age, WBC >10 g/L and poor karyotype in both univariate and multivariate analyses. The probability of 4 yr DFS was 30% for all 66 patients in CR (95% CI 11–49%). Poor karyotype was the only factor associated with decreased probability of DFS. Conclusions:  We conclude that CLAG-M is a well-tolerated and highly effective salvage regimen in poor risk refractory/relapsed AML. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The aim of our study was to determine the feasibility, effectiveness and toxicity of combined regimens consisting of rituximab and cladribine (2-CdA) (RC) and RC plus cyclophosphamide (RCC) in the treatment of patients with recurrent or refractory chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). Methods: The RC regimen consisted of rituximab given on day 1 and 2-CdA (days 2–6). The RCC protocol included rituximab (day 1), 2-CdA (days 2–4) and cyclophosphamide given on days 2–4. The courses were re-administered at time intervals of 4 weeks or longer if severe myelosuppression occurred. Results: Forty-six patients with CLL entered the study. Eighteen patients were treated with RC and 28 with RCC regimen. The median number of courses administered were three cycles (range 1–6). Three (6.5%) patients (95% CI: 1–14%) achieved a complete response and 31 (67%) patients (95% CI: 50–83%) a partial response. According to the particular regimen, the overall response rate was obtained in 12 (67%) patients treated with RC (95% CI: 45–89%) and in 22 patients (78%) treated with RCC (95% CI: 62–93%). The median progression free survival of responders to RC/RCC regimens was 12 months (range 4–46). Hypersensitivity to rituximab occurred in 16 (33%) patients, mostly during the first infusion of the drug. Grade 3/4 neutropenia was seen in six (13%) patients, grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia in three (9%) patients and grade 3/4 infections were observed in ten (28%) patients. Conclusions: These data indicate that both RC and RCC regimens are feasible in heavily pretreated patients with CLL, showing also distinct therapeutic activity and relatively low toxicity, even in patients previously treated with cladribine-based protocols. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The aim of this study was to determine the feasibility, efficacy and toxicity of the combined therapy consisting of cladribine (2-CdA), mitoxantrone and cyclophosphamide (CMC regimen) in patients with refractory or relapsed non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL). Thirty six patients, 14 with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 10 with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL), 5 with follicular lymphoma (FL), 3 with small lymphocytic lymphoma (SLL), and 4 with T-cell lymphoma were enrolled to the study. The CMC protocol consisted of 2-CdA at a dose of 0.12 mg/kg in a 2-hour infusion on days 1 through 3, mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1 and cyclophosphamide 650 mg/m2 i.v. on day 1. The CMC courses were repeated at intervals of 4 weeks. Thirty three patients were available for evaluation of response. Overall response rate (OR) was 58% (95% CI, 41 - 75%). Seven patients (21%; 95% CI, 7 - 35%) achieved a complete response (CR) and 12 patients (36%; 95% CI, 20 - 52%) achieved a partial response (PR). Seven of 19 patients with CR/PR are still in remission with a median follow-up of 3 months (range, 2 - 17 months). The median failure-free survival (FFS) was 5 months (range, 2 - 17 months). The median overall survival (OS) for the entire group was 9 months (range, 0.1 - 77 months). There was a significant difference in OS between responders and nonresponders after CMC therapy (log rank test, P = 0.015). When different disease status before CMC treatment was considered, a trend toward longer survival of recurrent patients was observed (log rank test, P = 0.08). Grade 3 - 4 neutropenia developed in 14 (39%) patients, and 16 episodes (15%) of grade 3 - 4 infections were observed. Grade 3 - 4 thrombocytopenia or anemia was seen in 9 patients (25%) and 10 patients (28%), respectively. The results of our study show that the CMC regimen is effective salvage therapy with acceptable toxicity in heavily pretreated patients with NHL including MCL and DLBCL. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Cutaneous lesions occur in up to 25% of patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia (CLL). These can be caused by either cutaneous seeding by leukemic cells (leukemia cutis, LC) and other malignant diseases or nonmalignant disorders. Skin infiltration with B-lymphocyte CLL manifests as solitary, grouped, or generalized papules, plaques, nodules, or large tumors. Prognosis in CLL patients with LC is rather good and many authors claim that it does not significantly affect patients' survival. However, prognosis is poor in patients in whom LC shows blastic transformation (Richter's syndrome) and when leukemic infiltrations in the skin appear after the diagnosis of CLL. Secondary cutaneous malignancies are also frequent complications in patients with CLL. A higher risk was seen in skin cancer, for which eightfold higher occurrence has been stated. There are some suggestions that alkylating agents and purine analogs may be associated with an increased incidence of secondary malignancies in CLL. Nonspecific, secondary cutaneous lesions are frequently observed in CLL patients. The most common secondary cutaneous changes seen in CLL are those of infectious or hemorrhagic origin. Other secondary lesions present as vasculitis, purpura, generalized pruritus, exfoliative erythroderma, and paraneoplastic pemphigus. An exaggerated reaction to an insect bite and insect bite-like reactions have been also observed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Chronic lymphocytic leukaemia (CLL) is a neoplastic disease of unknown aetiology characterised by an absolute lymphocytosis in peripheral blood and bone marrow. The disease is diagnosed most commonly in the elderly with the median age at diagnosis being about 65 years. The purine nucleoside analogues (PNAs) fludarabine, cladribine (2-chlorodeoxyadenosine) and pentostatin (2′-deoxycoformycin) are highly active in CLL, both in previously treated and in refractory or relapsed patients. These three agents share similar chemical structures and mechanisms of action such as induction of apoptosis. However, they also exhibit significant differences, especially in their interactions with enzymes involved in adenosine and deoxyadenosine metabolism. Recent randomised studies suggest that fludarabine and cladribine have similar activity in CLL. However, clinical observations indicate the existence of cross-resistance between fludarabine and cladribine. Patients who received PNAs as their initial therapy and achieved long-lasting response can be successfully retreated with the same agent. PNAs administered in combination with other chemotherapeutic agents and/or monoclonal antibodies may produce higher response rates, including complete response (CR) or molecular CR, compared with PNAs alone or other treatment regimens. Management decisions are more difficult in elderly patients because of the apparent increase in toxicity of PNAs in this population. In elderly patients, we recommend chlorambucil as the first-line treatment, with PNAs in lower doses in refractory or relapsed patients. Myelosuppression and infections, including opportunistic varieties, are the most frequent adverse effects in patients with CLL treated with PNAs. Therefore, some investigators recommend routine antibacterial and antiviral prophylaxis during and after PNA treatment. This review presents current results and treatment strategies with the use of PNAs in CLL, especially in elderly patients. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objectives: The circulating endothelial cells (CEC) are proposed to be a non-invasive marker of angiogenesis. The level of CEC in peripheral blood (PB) of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients has not been investigated prior to this study. We evaluated the count of resting (rCEC), activated (aCEC) and endothelial progenitor cells (CEPC) in the PB of AML and healthy subjects. In addition we correlated the levels of CEC with disease status, known prognostic factors and response to treatment. Methods: CEC were quantified by utilizing four-color flow cytometry procedures in 48 AML patients at the time of diagnosis and 29 healthy controls. Additionally, measurements were again taken after the first course of induction treatment in 12 of the patients. Results: The numbers of aCEC, rCEC and CEPC were significantly higher in the AML patients than in the controls ( P < 0.0001, P < 0.0001 and P < 0.001, respectively). The CEC count was significantly higher in the AML patients with white blood cell count (WBC) >15 G/L, elevated lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) levels and a higher (over median) absolute blasts count (ABC) in PB than in the group with WBC <15 G/L ( P < 0.03), a normal LDH level ( P < 0.03) and a lower (

The chimeric anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody rituximab has emerged as an effective single agent for the treatment of patients with CD20-positive indolent lymphoid malignancies (ILM). The purine nucleoside analogs (PNAs) fludarabine, cladribine, and pentostatin are also active agents in ILM and their interactions with rituximab may have important practical value. In vitro studies have shown synergistic or additive interactions between rituximab and PNAs. The results of recent clinical studies seem to confirm these preclinical observations. Several studies suggest that adding rituximab to fludarabine, cladribine, or pentostatin in the treatment of refractory/relapsed or treatment-naive patients with chronic lymphocytic leukemia, follicular lymphoma, and other low-grade non-Hodgkin lymphomas may produce an increase in overall and complete response rates and prolong progression-free survival. Taking into account the observation that the combination of PNAs with cyclophosphamide may be more effective than PNAs alone, the combined use of rituximab with cladribine, fludarabine, or pentostatin and cyclophosphamide, or even mitoxantrone, may be even more effective than rituximab or rituximab combined with PNAs. However, the importance of such combined therapies requires further study, especially in terms of progression-free survival, overall survival, and late complications such as opportunistic infections and secondary malignancies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]