Search

Background: Plain films and computed tomography (CT)–based imaging were the first to establish measurements that evaluated patellar instability. Limited research has shown the efficacy of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in evaluating these established measurements. Purpose: To identify morphological differences between normal knees and those with patellofemoral instability on MRI to determine what measurements are significant and how MRI-based means differ from historical means based on radiograph and CT imaging. Study Design: Case control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: Eighty-one controls and 40 patients with recurrent patellar instability between 2006 and 2010 were reviewed. The control patients had a history and an examination negative for patellofemoral symptoms. Patients with patellar instability had a history of at least 2 frank patellofemoral joint dislocations (PFJDs). The MRI images were obtained on the nonweightbearing knee in full extension. Measurements of patellar tilt, trochlear morphologic characteristics, and tibial tuberosity–trochlear groove (TTTG) distance were evaluated on axial slices, and patellar height was measured on sagittal images. Trochlear shape was assessed at the proximal and distal trochlea. Results: All measurements of patellar tilt (mean ± SD) were found to be significantly different between the 2 groups. For patellar height, the Insall-Salvati ratio (control, 1.08 ± 0.02; PFJD, 1.26 ± 0.03) and Caton-Deschamps ratio (control, 1.13 ± 0.02; PFJD, 1.29 ± 0.03) proved to be significantly different. Trochlear morphologic characteristics had numerous measurements prove to be significantly different proximally and distally. These included classic measurements such as sulcus angle (control, 148.48° ± 0.94°; PFJD, 165.57° ± 2.65°) and lateral trochlear inclination (control, 21.27° ± 0.66°; PFJD, 13.31° ± 1.36°) proximally and less established measurements such as the ratio of external (lateral) trochlea to internal (medial) trochlea (control, 1.51 ± 0.05; PFJD, 2.11 ± 0.17), a measurement of facet asymmetry. Conclusion: The MRI-based patellar tilt measures proved to be an excellent group of measurements for delineating between controls and those with instability. Patella alta ratios, such as Insall-Salvati and Caton-Deschamps, demonstrated a statistically significant difference between normal and recurrent dislocators. Trochlear measurements proved significantly different at the proximal and distal trochlea. Our findings demonstrate that MRI is appropriate to help discern recognized pathologic abnormalities that characterize patellofemoral instability.

The AAOS Evidence-Based Guideline on Management of Carpal Tunnel Syndrome (CTS) includes both diagnosis and treatment. This clinical practice guideline has been endorsed by the American Society for Surgery of the Hand (ASSH), the American College of Radiology (ACR), the American College of Surgeons (ACS), and the American Society of Plastic Surgeons (ASPS). This brief summary of the AAOS Clinical Practice Guideline contains a list of the recommendations and the rating of strength based on the quality of the supporting evidence. Discussion of how each recommendation was developed and the complete evidence report are contained in the full guideline at www.aaos.org/guidelines. ### OBSERVATION Strong evidence supports that thenar atrophy is strongly associated with ruling in CTS but poorly associated with ruling out CTS. Strength of Recommendation: Strong ★★★★ ### PHYSICAL SIGNS Strong evidence supports not using the Phalen test, Tinel sign, or upper limb neurodynamic/nerve test (ULNT) criterion A/B as independent physical examination maneuvers to diagnose CTS, because alone, each has a poor or weak association with ruling in or ruling out CTS. Strength of Recommendation: Strong ★★★★ ### MANEUVERS Moderate evidence supports not using the following as independent physical examination maneuvers to diagnose CTS, because alone, each has a poor or weak association with ruling in or ruling out CTS

Objective Compared to the well-established stimulating catheter technique, the use of ultrasound guidance alone for interscalene perineural catheter insertion is a recent development and has not yet been examined in a randomized fashion. We hypothesized that an ultrasound-guided technique would require less time and produce equivalent results compared to electrical stimulation (ES) when trainees attempt interscalene perineural catheter placement. Methods Preoperatively, patients receiving an interscalene perineural catheter for shoulder surgery were randomly assigned to an insertion protocol using either ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter or ES with a stimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the procedural duration (in minutes), starting when the ultrasound probe (ultrasound group) or catheter insertion needle (ES group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter insertion needle was removed after catheter insertion. Results All ultrasound-guided catheters (n = 20) were placed successfully and resulted in surgical anesthesia versus 85% of ES-guided catheters (n = 20; P = .231). Perineural catheters placed by ultrasound (n = 20) took a median (10th-90th percentiles) of 8.0 (5.0-15.5) minutes compared to 14.0 (5.0-30.0) minutes for ES (n = 20; P = .022). All catheters placed according to the protocol in both treatment groups resulted in a successful nerve block; however, 1 patient in the ES group had local anesthetic spread to the epidural space. There was 1 vascular puncture using ultrasound guidance compared to 5 in the ES-guided catheter group (P = .182). Conclusions Trainees using a new ultrasound-guided technique can place inter-scalene perineural catheters in less time compared to a well-documented technique using ES with a stimulating catheter and can produce equivalent results.

Continuous femoral nerve blocks provide potent analgesia and other benefits after knee surgery. Perineural catheter placement techniques using ultrasound guidance and electrical stimulation (ES) have been described, but the optimal method remains undetermined. We tested the hypothesis that ultrasound guidance alone requires less time for femoral perineural catheter insertion and produces equivalent results compared with ES alone.Preoperatively, patients receiving a femoral perineural catheter for knee surgery were randomly assigned to either ultrasound guidance with a nonstimulating catheter or ES with a stimulating catheter. The primary outcome was the catheter placement procedure time (minutes) starting when the ultrasound transducer (ultrasound group) or catheter insertion needle (ES group) first touched the patient and ending when the catheter insertion needle was removed after catheter insertion.Perineural catheters placed with ultrasound guidance (n = 20) took a median (10th-90th percentiles) of 5.0 (3.9-10.0) minutes compared with 8.5 (4.8-30.0) minutes for ES (n = 20; P = .012). All ultrasound-guided catheters were placed according to the protocol (n = 20) versus 85% of ES-guided catheters (n = 20; P = .086). Patients in the ultrasound group had a median procedure-related discomfort score of 0.5 (0.0-3.1) compared with 2.5 (0.0-7.6) for the ES group (P = .015). There were no vascular punctures with ultrasound guidance versus 4 in the ES group (P = .039).Placement of femoral perineural catheters takes less time with ultrasound guidance compared with ES. In addition, ultrasound guidance produces less procedure-related pain and prevents inadvertent vascular puncture.

The posterior approach for placing continuous interscalene catheters has not been studied in a controlled investigation. In this randomized, triple-masked, placebo-controlled study, we tested the hypothesis that an ultrasound-guided continuous posterior interscalene block provides superior postoperative analgesia compared to a single-injection ropivacaine interscalene block after moderately painful shoulder surgery.Preoperatively, subjects received a stimulating interscalene catheter using an ultrasound-guided, in-plane posterior approach. All subjects received an initial bolus of ropivacaine. Postoperatively, subjects were discharged with oral analgesics and a portable infusion device containing either ropivacaine 0.2% or normal saline programmed to deliver a perineural infusion over 2 days. The primary outcome was average pain on postoperative day (POD) 1 (scale: 0-10). Secondary outcomes included least and worst pain scores, oral opioid requirements, sleep disturbances, patient satisfaction, and incidence of complications.Of the 32 subjects enrolled, 30 perineural catheters were placed per protocol. Continuous ropivacaine perineural infusion (n = 15) produced a statistically and clinically significant reduction in average pain (median [10th-90th percentile]) on POD 1 compared with saline infusion (n = 15) after initial ropivacaine bolus (0.0 [0.0-5.0] versus 3.0 [0.0-6.0], respectively; P0.001). Median oral opioid consumption (oxycodone) was lower in the ropivacaine group than in the placebo group on POD 1 (P = 0.002) and POD 2 (P = 0.002). Subjects who received a ropivacaine infusion suffered fewer sleep disturbances than those in the placebo group (P = 0.005 on POD 0 and 1 nights) and rated their satisfaction with analgesia higher than subjects who received normal saline (P0.001).Compared to a single-injection interscalene block, a 2-day continuous posterior interscalene block provides greater pain relief, minimizes supplemental opioid requirements, greatly improves sleep quality, and increases patient satisfaction after moderate-to-severe painful outpatient shoulder surgery.

Background Controversy remains regarding the results of all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with the mini-open approach. The purpose of this study was to perform a comprehensive literature search and meta-analysis of clinical trials comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs and mini-open rotator cuff repairs. Hypothesis There is no difference between the clinical results obtained from all arthroscopic rotator cuff repairs compared with mini-open repairs. Study Design Meta-analysis. Methods A computerized search of articles published between 1966 and July 2006 was performed using MEDLINE and PubMed. Additionally, a search of abstracts from 4 major annual meetings each held between 2000 and 2005 was performed to identify Level I to III studies comparing the results of arthroscopic rotator cuff repair and mini-open repair. Studies that included follow-up of an average of over 2 years and a minimum of 1 year and included the use of 1 of 4 validated functional outcome scores used to study shoulder injuries were included in the present meta-analysis. All outcome scores were converted to a 100-point scale to allow for outcome comparison. Results Five studies that met the inclusion criteria were identified. There was no difference in functional outcome scores or complications between the arthroscopic and mini-open repair groups. Conclusion Based on current literature, there was no difference in outcomes between the arthroscopic and mini-open rotator cuff repair techniques.

A review of the current literature identified two primary causes of avulsion of the lesser trochanter: strenuous flexion of the hip in adolescent athletes with open epiphyses2,5-9,11,15,16 and pathological fracture associated with a metastatic lesion of bone3,14. In both cases, stress concentration at the site of the iliopsoas muscle leads to a tensile failure of either the apophysis or the lesser trochanter. Typically, the force necessary to avulse an otherwise normal apophysis is much greater than that required to produce a pathological fracture, and the latter mechanism is rarely associated with a history of trauma20. We report the cases of four patients who had an avulsion fracture of the lesser trochanter secondary to a primary malignant tumor of bone. To our knowledge, this is the first report in which a pathological fracture of the lesser trochanter was the presenting symptom leading to the diagnosis of such a tumor. In the absence of a traumatic event, an isolated fracture of the lesser trochanter should suggest an underlying pathological process, particularly a primary or metastatic tumor. To avoid inappropriate operative procedures, a pathological diagnosis must be made by means of a biopsy before internal fixation is attempted. CASE 1. A forty-four-year-old man was first seen by us in June 1985 because of a two-week history of pain in the left hip without antecedent trauma. The pain had been insidious in onset and was aggravated by flexion of the hip. The patient had noted an acute worsening of the pain while sailing. At the time of presentation, he also reported pain in the groin and weakness in the left lower extremity. Clinical examination demonstrated weakness and an inability to flex the left hip against resistance secondary …