Search

Five patients, comprising nine treatment courses of sargramostim use in pulmonary alveolar proteinosis, are described. The prevailing standard of treatment, whole lung lavage (WLL), is highly invasive, resource intensive and carries some procedural risk. Nebulised recombinant human GM-CSF (sargramostim) offers a pharmacological treatment option, allowing patients to be treated at home, possessing potential advantages in patient experience and wider health resourcing. The majority of reported patients described subjective improvement in symptoms along with radiographical improvement, although this did not translate into significant improvement in pulmonary function testing. Drug scarcity and high drug cost remain potential barriers to accessing this treatment, and so careful patient selection and treatment outcome assessment remain as challenging needs. Incorporating the routine assessment of validated patient symptom scores with objective physiological measures will allow prediction of response to treatment and help guide management. This report describes the largest published experience of sargramostim use in Australia.

Backgrounds Victoria (Australia) and Denmark have comparable population sizes and high-quality healthcare systems. Lung cancer surgery, however, is performed in more than 20 Victorian hospitals compared to four in Denmark. Such differences in centralization may influence outcomes. We engaged clinical quality registries to enable international benchmarking by exploring patterns of lung cancer surgery including mortality and survival. Methods All patients undergoing lung cancer surgery between 2015 and 2018 registered in the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry and the Danish Lung Cancer Registry were included. Analyses on stage concordance, 30 and 90-day mortality, and overall survival were restricted to a selected subgroup with NSCLC and no neo-adjuvant therapy or metastatic disease and only one operation. Results We included 1554 Victorian and 4319 Danish patients. The resection rate was 26.3% in Victoria and 28% in Denmark, but a higher proportion of Victorian patients underwent wedge resection (19.1% versus 8.8%). Stage concordance was 59.6% and 54.9% in Victoria and Denmark, respectively. The 30- and 90-day mortality was 1.3% and 2.6% in Victoria, compared to 1.4% and 2.8% in Denmark with no difference in overall survival (p = 0.28) or risk-adjusted survival (HR: 1.10 (95% CI: 0.89-1.37); p = 0.38). Conclusion High-quality surgical lung cancer care was confirmed by similar high resection and low mortality rates including no overall survival difference. The drivers and consequences of stage discordance and differences in patterns of resection deserve further exploration. This study provides a model for international benchmarking using clinical quality registries, although caution remains in the interpretation given disparities in data completeness.

Background Chronic rhinosinusitis affects 62% of adults with bronchiectasis and is linked to greater bronchiectasis severity. However, the impact of symptoms of chronic rhinosinusitis on disease‐specific and cough‐related quality of life is unknown. Methods In this cross‐sectional study, adults with stable bronchiectasis and chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms completed the sinonasal outcome test‐22 (SNOT‐22), quality of life–bronchiectasis questionnaire, and Leicester cough questionnaire. Bronchiectasis severity was assessed using the bronchiectasis severity index (BSI) and chest high‐resolution computed tomography (HRCT). Results Sixty participants with bronchiectasis (mean [SD] forced expiratory volume in 1 s of 73.2 [25.5] %predicted) were included. Greater severity of chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms (based on SNOT‐22) was moderately associated with impaired cough‐related quality of life (according to the Leicester cough questionnaire; all r > −.60) and impaired bronchiectasis‐specific quality of life (based on the quality of life–bronchiectasis questionnaire), with impaired physical function (r = −.518), less vitality (r = −.631), reduced social function (r = −.546), greater treatment burden (r = −.411), and increased severity of respiratory symptoms (r = −.534). Chronic rhinosinusitis symptoms were unrelated to disease severity according to the BSI (r = .135) and HRCT scoring (all r

BACKGROUND Multidisciplinary meeting (MDM) discussion and early palliative care are recommended in lung cancer management. The literature is unclear whether MDM discussion leads to early palliative care and improved end-of-life care. AIMS To evaluate impacts of discussion at an Australian lung MDM on palliative care referral, and MDM and early palliative care on aggressive end-of-life care. METHODS A retrospective, cross-sectional study was conducted of 352 patients diagnosed with primary lung cancer from 2017 to 2019 at the Alfred Hospital, Melbourne. The primary question was whether MDM discussion influenced palliative care referrals. Secondary questions were whether MDM discussion and early palliative care reduced aggressive treatment (chemotherapy, hospitalisation, emergency department visits, intensive care admission and in-hospital death) during the last 30 days of life. Multivariable logistic regression was used to determine independent association between MDM discussion and palliative care referral. RESULTS MDM discussion did not independently impact palliative care referral. There was reduced likelihood of MDM presentation in patients with metastatic disease (P

Au cours des dernières années, l’utilisation recommandée du vaccin vivant atténué contre l’influenza (VVAI) pour les enfants a évolué aux États-Unis en réponse aux preuves d’une diminution potentielle de l’efficacité du VVAI basées sur la surveillance post-commercialisation. Ces problèmes n’ont pas été observés au Canada ou ailleurs ; par conséquent, les recommandations du Comité consultatif national de l’immunisation (CCNI) du Canada et du Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) des États-Unis sur l’opportunité d’utiliser le VVAI ont différé pour deux saisons grippales (2016–2017 et 2017–2018). Cette rétrospective décrit comment le CCNI est parvenu à ses recommandations en réponse aux signaux post-commercialisation d’une baisse de performance des VVAI provenant des États-Unis en 2013–2014 et à nouveau en 2015–2016. L’expérience du CCNI avec le VVAI marque la première fois au Canada où une recommandation préférentielle sur l’utilisation d’un vaccin antigrippal dans un programme d’immunisation systématique a été renversée. Cette expérience souligne l’importance d’une surveillance continue des vaccins après leur mise sur le marché, d’une collaboration internationale et d’une prise en compte attentive du contexte local pour étayer les recommandations relatives aux vaccins. La capacité du CCNI à réagir rapidement aux signaux de performance des vaccins après leur mise sur le marché facilitera la réaction à des signaux similaires de surveillance après la mise sur le marché des vaccins contre la maladie à coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19).

Over the last several years, the recommended use of the live-attenuated influenza vaccine (LAIV) for children has evolved in the United States (US) in response to evidence of a potential decrease in LAIV effectiveness based on post-market monitoring. These issues were not observed in Canada or elsewhere; consequently, recommendations from Canada’s National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) and the US Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) on whether to use LAIV differed for two influenza seasons (2016–2017 and 2017–2018). This retrospective describes how NACI arrived at its recommendations in response to post-market signals of reduced LAIV performance from the US in 2013–2014 and again in 2015–2016. NACI’s experience with LAIV marks the first time in Canada where a preferential recommendation on the use of an influenza vaccine in a routine immunization program was reversed. This experience highlights the importance of ongoing post-market monitoring of vaccines, international collaboration and careful consideration of local context to inform vaccine recommendations. NACI’s capacity for timely responses to post-market vaccine performance signals will facilitate responsiveness to similar post-market monitoring signals from the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) vaccines.

Introduction Patients with NSCLC may be treated with curative intent, yet they remain at high risk of both disease recurrence and second primary lung cancer (SPLC) and increased risk of early death. Guidelines provide recommendations for follow-up, but there is little consensus, and review of available evidence is necessary. The use of a systematic follow-up strategy for the detection of disease recurrence or SPLC after curative-intent treatment of NSCLC may increase the proportion of patients available for retreatment and increase the survival of patients with surveillance detection. Methods We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective studies on follow-up of NSCLC after curative-intent treatment to answer the following three questions: What is the effect of follow-up on detection of recurrence or SPLC? What is the effect of surveillance detection on curative-intent retreatment? What is the survival impact? Results Recurrence or SPLC was observed in 17.8% to 71% of patients. Scheduled imaging-detected recurrence in 60% to 100% of cases, yet neither computed tomography–based (OR = 2.31, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.27–19.49, p = 0.44) nor positron emission tomography-computed tomography–based follow-up (OR = 1.431, 95% CI: 0.92–2.22, p = 0.12) was statistically superior to standard follow-up strategies. Detection of disease recurrence/SPLC significantly increased the odds of curative-intent retreatment (OR = 4.31; 95% CI: 2.10–8.84, p Conclusions The early detection of disease recurrence/SPLC may increase the likelihood of curative-intent retreatment and prolong survival. There is a clear need for prospective randomized controlled studies of follow-up to confirm effectiveness of available follow-up modalities.

Treatment of elderly patients with lung cancer is significantly hindered by concerns about treatment tolerability, toxicity and limited clinical trial data in the elderly; potentially giving rise to treatment nihilism amongst clinicians. This study aims to describe survival in elderly patients with lung cancer and explore potential causes for excess mortality. Patients diagnosed with lung cancer in the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry between 2011–2018 were analysed (n=3481). Patients were age-categorised and compared using Cox-regression modelling to determine mortality risk, after adjusting for confounding. Probability of being offered cancer treatments was also determined, further stratified by disease stage. The eldest patients (≥80 years old) had significantly shorter median survival compared with younger age groups (, Treatment strongly determines lung cancer survival, yet nihilism may threaten treatment provision and survival outcomes. Older patients in this cohort had reduced multidisciplinary presentation, less treatment (OR 0.24) and 28% increased mortality risk. https://bit.ly/2ZGotj0

Background Wide variation exists globally in the treatment and outcomes of stage III patients with non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). We conducted an up-to-date patterns of care analysis in the state of Victoria, Australia, with a particular focus on the proportion of patients receiving treatment with radical intent, treatment trends over time, and survival. Materials and Methods Stage III patients with NSCLC were identified in the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry and categorized by treatment received and treatment intent. Logistic regression was used to explore factors predictive of receipt of radical treatment and the treatment trends over time. Cox regression was used to explore variables associated with overall survival (OS). Covariates evaluated included age, sex, ECOG performance status, smoking status, year of diagnosis, Australian born, Aboriginal or Torres Strait Islander status, socioeconomic status, rurality, public/private status of notifying institution, and multidisciplinary meeting discussion. Results A total of 1396 patients were diagnosed between 2012 and 2019 and received treatment with radical intent 67%, palliative intent 23%, unknown intent 5% and no treatment 5%. Radical intent treatment was less likely if patients were >75 years, ECOG ≥1, had T3-4 or N3 disease or resided rurally. Surgery use decreased over time, while concurrent chemoradiotherapy and immunotherapy use increased. Median OS was 38.0, 11.1, and 4.4 months following radical treatment, palliative treatment or no treatment, respectively. Conclusion Almost a third of stage III patients with NSCLC still do not receive radical treatment. Strategies to facilitate radical treatment and better support decision making between increasing multimodality options are required.

Mortality from non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) exhibits substantial geographical disparities. However, there is little evidence on whether this variation could be attributed to patients' clinical characteristics and/or socioeconomic inequalities. This study evaluated the independent and relative contribution of the individual- and area-level risk factors on geographic variation in 2-year all-cause mortality among NSCLC patients. In the Hierarchical-related regression approach, we used the Bayesian spatial multilevel logistic regression model to combine individual- and area-level predictors with outcomes while accounting for geographically structured and unstructured correlation. Individual-level data included 3330 NSCLC cases reported to the Victoria Lung Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2016. Area-level data comprised socioeconomic disadvantage, remoteness and pollution data at the postal area level in Victoria, Australia. With the inclusion of significant individual- and area-level risk factors, timely (≤14 days) first definitive treatment (odds ratio [OR] = 0.73, 95% credible interval [Crl] = 0.56-0.94) and multidisciplinary meetings (MDM) (OR = 0.74, 95% Crl = 0.59-0.93) showed an independent association with a lower likelihood of NSCLC 2-year all-cause mortality. Timely and delayed (>14 days) first nondefinitive treatment, no treatment, advanced clinical stage, smoking, poor performance status, public hospital insurance and area-level deprivation were independently associated with a higher likelihood of 2- and 5-year all-cause mortality. NSCLC's 2-year all-cause mortality exhibited substantial geographic variation, mainly associated with timeliness and receipt of first definitive treatment, no treatment followed by patient prognostic factors with some contribution from area-level deprivation, MDM and public hospital insurance. This study highlights NSCLC patients should receive the first definitive treatment within the recommended 14-days from diagnosis.

Contexte : TrumenbaMC, un vaccin bivalent contre l’infection invasive à méningocoque du sérogroupe B (MenB-fHBP) de la protéine liant le facteur H, a été autorisé au Canada en octobre 2017 pour la prévention de l’infection invasive à méningocoque causée par la bactérie Neisseria meningitidis du sérogroupe B chez les personnes âgées de 10 à 25 ans. Le Comité consultatif national de l’immunisation (CCNI) formule des recommandations à l’Agence de santé publique du Canada sur l’utilisation des vaccins contre le méningocoque. Objectif : Résumer les recommandations du CCNI concernant l’utilisation du vaccin MenB-fHBP au Canada. Méthodes : Le groupe de travail du CCNI sur l’infection à méningocoque a élaboré une stratégie de recherche prédéfinie en vue de dresser la liste de toutes les études admissibles, en évaluer leur qualité, et résumer et analyser leurs résultats. Selon le processus fondé sur des données probantes du CCNI, le groupe de travail a ensuite proposé des recommandations et déterminé la qualité des évidences à l’appui. À la lumière des données probantes, les recommandations ont ensuite été examinées et approuvées par le CCNI. Résultats : Les deux vaccins contre le méningocoque du sérogroupe B présentement autorisés au Canada ne sont pas interchangeables puisqu’ils contiennent des antigènes différents et qu’il n’existe aucune étude publiée sur l’immunogénicité d’une série de vaccins conjuguant les deux produits. À la suite de l’examen des données probantes, le CCNI recommande l’utilisation du vaccin MenB-fHBP chez les personnes de 10 ans et plus dans les situations où un vaccin contre l’infection invasive à méningocoque du sérogroupe B devrait être proposé : 1) au cours d’une éclosion des cas d’infection à méningocoque du sérogroupe B ou lors de l’émergence de souches hyperendémiques de N. meningitidis qui devraient être réceptives au vaccin; 2) pour la protection des sujets en contact étroit avec un cas d’infection invasive à méningocoque attribué à N. meningitidis du sérogroupe B; 3) pour les sujets atteints de problèmes de santé sous-jacents les exposant à un risque de méningococcie supérieur à celui de l’ensemble de la population; ou 4) pour les sujets présentant un risque d’exposition aux isolats de méningococcique du sérogroupe B supérieur à celui de l’ensemble de la population. Le CCNI recommande également de considérer le vaccin MenB-fHBP comme une option pour les personnes âgées de 10 à 25 ans qui ne présentent pas un risque de méningococcie supérieur à celui de l’ensemble de la population, mais qui souhaitent réduire leur risque de contracter une infection invasive à méningocoque du sérogroupe B. Conclusion : Le CCNI recommande toujours d’offrir un vaccin contre l’infection invasive à méningocoque du sérogroupe B à tous les sujets qui sont à plus haut risque d’infection en raison d’un problème de santé sous-jacent ou un majeur risque d’exposition. En plus de fournir des conseils relatifs aux décideurs en santé publique (c.-à-d. les provinces et les territoires qui prennent des décisions concernant les programmes publiques de vaccination), ces recommandations du CCNI fournissent des renseignements aux particuliers, aux fournisseurs de vaccins et aux organisations sur les vaccins qui ne sont peut-être pas actuellement inclus dans les programmes publiques de vaccination. Le CCNI continue de ne pas recommander l’utilisation des vaccins du sérogroupe B dans les programmes universels canadiens de vaccination systématique pour le moment.

Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis (PAP) is a rare respiratory syndrome, which can be challenging to diagnose given its non‐specific presentation and imaging findings. While most primary cases of PAP have an autoimmune basis, the triggers for the disease are uncertain with occupational factors increasingly thought to be important. We report the unusual complication of pneumomediastinum and bilateral pneumothoraces following endobronchial ultrasound‐guided transbronchial needle aspirate in the setting of PAP. We discuss the possible physiological mechanisms of this complication, which appears to be more common in conditions with reduced lung compliance., Pulmonary alveolar proteinosis is a rare disease which can be challenging to diagnose. We report the case of a 30‐year‐old male who developed the condition in the setting of occupational exposures and describe an unusual complication of bronchoscopy that presented management challenges.

Studies of chest computed tomography (CT) in patients with primary antibody deficiency syndromes (ADS) suggest a broad range of bronchial pathology. However, there are as yet no multicentre studies to assess the variety of bronchial pathology in this patient group. One of the underlying reasons is the lack of a consensus methodology, a prerequisite to jointly document chest CT findings. We aimed to establish an international platform for the evaluation of bronchial pathology as assessed by chest CT and to describe the range of bronchial pathologies in patients with antibody deficiency. Ffteen immunodeficiency centres from 9 countries evaluated chest CT scans of patients with ADS using a predefined list of potential findings including an extent score for bronchiectasis. Data of 282 patients with ADS were collected. Patients with common variable immunodeficiency disorders (CVID) comprised the largest subgroup (232 patients, 82.3%). Eighty percent of CVID patients had radiological evidence of bronchial pathology including bronchiectasis in 61%, bronchial wall thickening in 44% and mucus plugging in 29%. Bronchiectasis was detected in 44% of CVID patients aged less than 20 years. Cough was a better predictor for bronchiectasis than spirometry values. Delay of diagnosis as well as duration of disease correlated positively with presence of bronchiectasis. The use of consensus diagnostic criteria and a pre-defined list of bronchial pathologies allows for comparison of chest CT data in multicentre studies. Our data suggest a high prevalence of bronchial pathology in CVID due to late diagnosis or duration of disease.

BackgroundThe 12-item Short-Form Health Survey version 2 (SF-12v2), a widely used, generic patient-reported measure of health status that provides summary scores of physical and mental health. No study to date has examined the measurement properties of the SF-12v2 in patients with lung cancer using Rasch analysis. The aim of this study was to extend the psychometric evaluations of the SF-12 within the lung cancer population to ensure its validity and reliability to assess the health status in this population.MethodsParticipants in the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry (VLCR) who completed the SF-12v2 between 2012 and 2016 were included in this study. The structural validity of the SF-12v2 was assessed using Rasch analysis. Overall fit to the Rasch measurement model was examined as well as five key measurement properties: uni-dimensionality, response thresholds, internal consistency, measurement invariance and targeting.ResultsA total of 342 participants completed the SF-12v2 three months following their lung cancer diagnosis. The SF-12 Physical Component Score (PCS-12) did not fit the overall Rasch measurement model (χ2107.0;p 235.1;p = 0.07), reasonable targeting and good internal consistency (PSI 0.81).ConclusionsRasch analysis suggests that there is general support for the reliability of the SF-12v2 as a measure of physical and mental health in people with lung cancer. However, the appropriateness of some items (e.g. pain) in the PCS-12 is questionable and further refinement of the scale including changing the response options may be required to improve the ability of the SF-12v2 to more appropriately assess the health status of this population.

Predicting lung cancer cases at the small-area level is helpful to quantify the lung cancer burden for health planning purposes at the local geographic level. Using Victorian Cancer Registry (2001–2018) data, this study aims to forecast lung cancer counts at the local government area (LGA) level over the next ten years (2019–2028) in Victoria, Australia. We used the Age-Period-Cohort approach to estimate the annual age-specific incidence and utilised Bayesian spatio-temporal models that account for non-linear temporal trends and area-level risk factors. Compared to 2001, lung cancer incidence increased by 28.82% from 1353 to 1743 cases for men and 78.79% from 759 to 1357 cases for women in 2018. Lung cancer counts are expected to reach 2515 cases for men and 1909 cases for women in 2028, with a corresponding 44% and 41% increase. The majority of LGAs are projected to have an increasing trend for both men and women by 2028. Unexplained area-level spatial variation substantially reduced after adjusting for the elderly population in the model. Male and female lung cancer cases are projected to rise at the state level and in each LGA in the next ten years. Population growth and an ageing population largely contributed to this rise.

Purpose To inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care on screening in primary care for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer by systematically reviewing evidence of (a) effectiveness; (b) test accuracy; (c) individuals’ values and preferences; and (d) strategies aimed at improving screening rates. Methods De novo reviews will be conducted to evaluate effectiveness and to assess values and preferences. For test accuracy and strategies to improve screening rates, we will integrate studies from existing systematic reviews with search updates to the present. Two Cochrane reviews will provide evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes from the conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. We will search Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central (except for individuals’ values and preferences, where Medline, Scopus, and EconLit will be searched) via peer-reviewed search strategies and the reference lists of included studies and reviews. We will search ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. Two reviewers will screen potentially eligible studies and agree on those to include. Data will be extracted by one reviewer with verification by another. Two reviewers will independently assess risk of bias and reach consensus. Where possible and suitable, we will pool studies via meta-analysis. We will compare accuracy data per outcome and per comparison using the Rutter and Gatsonis hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model and report relative sensitivities and specificities. Findings on values and preferences will be synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach and thematic analysis, depending on study designs. Two reviewers will appraise the certainty of evidence for all outcomes using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and come to consensus. Discussion The publication of guidance on screening in primary care for the prevention and early detection of cervical cancer by the Task Force in 2013 focused on cytology. Since 2013, new studies using human papillomavirus tests for cervical screening have been published that will improve our understanding of screening in primary care settings. This review will inform updated recommendations based on currently available studies and address key evidence gaps noted in our previous review.

Purpose. To inform recommendations by the Canadian Task Force on Preventive Health Care on cervical cancer screening by systematically reviewing evidence of: (a) the effectiveness; (b) test accuracy; (c) individuals’ values and preferences, and (d) strategies aimed at improving screening rates.Methods. De novo reviews will be conducted to evaluate effectiveness and to assess values and preferences. For test accuracy and strategies to improve screening rates, we will integrate studies from existing systematic reviews with search updates to the present. Two Cochrane reviews will provide evidence of adverse pregnancy outcomes from the conservative management of cervical intraepithelial neoplasia. We will search Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Central (except for individuals’ values and preferences, where Medline, Scopus, and EconLit will be searched) via peer-reviewed search strategies, and the reference lists of included studies and reviews. We will search ClinicalTrials.gov and the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform for ongoing trials. Two reviewers will screen potentially eligible studies and agree on those to include. Data will be extracted by one reviewer with verification by another. Two reviewers will independently assess risk of bias and reach consensus. Where possible and suitable, we will pool studies via meta-analysis. We will compare accuracy data per outcome and per comparison using the Rutter and Gatsonis hierarchical summary receiver operating characteristic model and report relative sensitivities and specificities. Findings on values and preferences will be synthesized using a narrative synthesis approach and thematic analysis, depending on study designs. Two reviewers will appraise the certainty of evidence for all outcomes using GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation) and come to consensus.Discussion. The publication of guidance on cervical cancer screening by the Task Force in 2013 focused on cytology. Since 2013, new studies using human papillomavirus tests for detection of cervical cancer have been published that will improve our understanding of screening in primary care settings. This review will inform updated recommendations based on currently available studies and address key evidence gaps noted in our previous review.Systematic review registration: not registered.

Background: Guideline-concordant treatment (GCT) of lung cancer has been observed to vary across geographic regions over the years. However, there is little evidence as to what extent this variation is explained by differences in patients' clinical characteristics versus contextual factors, including socioeconomic inequalities. Methods: This study evaluated the independent effects of individual- and area-level risk factors on geographic and temporal variation in receipt of GCT among patients with lung cancer. Receipt of GCT was defined on the basis of the National Comprehensive Cancer Network guidelines. We used Bayesian spatial-temporal multilevel models to combine individual and areal predictors and outcomes while accounting for geographically structured and unstructured correlation and linear and nonlinear trends. Results: Our study included 4,854 non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) and small cell lung cancer (SCLC) cases, reported to the Victorian Lung Cancer Registry between 2011 and 2018. Area-level data comprised socioeconomic disadvantage and remoteness data at the local government area level in Victoria, Australia. Around 60.36% of patients received GCT, and the rates varied across geographic areas over time. This variation was mainly associated with poor performance status, advanced clinical stages, NSCLC types, public hospital insurance, area-level deprivation, and comorbidities. Conclusions: This study highlights the need to address disparities in receipt of GCT among patients with lung cancer with poor performance status, NSCLC, advanced clinical stage, stage I–III SCLC, stage III NSCLC, public hospital insurance, and comorbidities, and living in socioeconomically disadvantaged areas. Impact: Two-year mortality outcomes significantly improved with GCT. Interventions aimed at reducing these inequalities could help to improve lung cancer outcomes.

Background TrumenbaTM, a bivalent, factor-H binding protein meningococcal serogroup B (MenB-fHBP) vaccine was authorized for use in Canada in October 2017 for the prevention of invasive meningococcal disease (IMD) caused by Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B in individuals 10-25 years of age. The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) provides recommendations regarding the use of meningococcal vaccines to the Public Health Agency of Canada. Objective To summarize NACI recommendations regarding the use of MenB-fHBP vaccine in Canada. Methods The NACI Meningococcal Disease Working Group developed a predefined search strategy to identify all eligible studies, assessed the quality of these studies, and summarized and analyzed the findings. According to the NACI evidence-based process, the working group then proposed recommendations and identified the grade of evidence that supported them. In light of the evidence, the recommendations were then considered and approved by NACI. Results The two serogroup B meningococcal vaccines currently authorized for use in Canada are not interchangeable as they contain different antigens and there are no published studies on the immunogenicity resulting from a vaccination series combining the two products. Following the review of evidence, NACI recommends that MenB-fHBP vaccine may be considered as an option for use in individuals 10 years of age and older in situations when a serogroup B meningococcal vaccine should be offered: 1) during serogroup B meningococcal disease outbreaks or with the emergence of hyperendemic N. meningitidis strains that are predicted to be susceptible to the vaccine; 2) for individuals who are close contacts with a case of invasive meningococcal disease caused by serogroup B N. meningitidis; 3) for individuals with underlying medical conditions that would put them at higher risk of meningococcal disease than the general population; or 4) for individuals at higher risk of exposure to serogroup B meningococcal isolates than the general population. NACI also recommends that MenB-fHBP vaccine may be considered as an option for individuals 10-25 years of age who are not at higher risk of meningococcal disease than the general population, but who wish to reduce their risk of invasive serogroup B meningococcal disease. Conclusion NACI recommends immunization against serogroup B IMD for all individuals who are at a higher risk of disease due to an underlying medical condition or an increased risk of exposure. In addition to providing guidance to public health decision-makers (i.e. provinces/territories making decisions for publicly-funded immunization programs), these NACI recommendations provide information to individuals, vaccine providers and organizations about vaccines that may not currently be included in publicly funded immunization programs. NACI continues to recommend against the use of the serogroup B vaccines in routine universal immunization programs in Canada at this time.

Background Annual influenza vaccination is recommended to all individuals over 6 months of age, including predominantly antibody deficiency (PAD) patients. Vaccination responses are typically evaluated by serology, and because PAD patients are by definition impaired in generating IgG and receive immunoglobulin replacement therapy (IgRT), it remains unclear whether they can mount an antigen‐specific response. Objective To quantify and characterise the antigen‐specific memory B (Bmem) cell compartment in healthy controls and PAD patients following an influenza booster vaccination. Methods Recombinant hemagglutinin (HA) from the A/Michigan/2015 H1N1 (AM15) strain with an AviTag was generated in a mammalian cell line, and following targeted biotinylation, was tetramerised with BUV395 or BUV737 streptavidin conjugates. Multicolour flow cytometry was applied on blood samples before and 28 days after booster influenza vaccination in 16 healthy controls and five PAD patients with circulating Bmem cells. Results Recombinant HA tetramers were specifically recognised by 0.5–1% of B cells in previously vaccinated healthy adults. HA‐specific Bmem cell numbers were significantly increased following booster vaccination and predominantly expressed IgG1. Similarly, PAD patients carried HA‐specific Bmem cells, predominantly expressing IgG1. However, these numbers were lower than in controls and did not increase following booster vaccination. Conclusion We have successfully identified AM15‐specific Bmem cells in healthy controls and PAD patients. The presence of antigen‐specific Bmem cells could offer an additional diagnostic tool to aid in the clinical diagnosis of PAD. Furthermore, alterations in the number or immunophenotype of HA‐specific Bmem cells post‐booster vaccination could assist in the evaluation of immune responses in individuals receiving IgRT., We here developed an extensive flowcytometry panel to examine influenza‐specific memory B cells using fluorescently labeled recombinant haemagglutinin (HA) tetramers. Influenza‐specific memory B cells were predominantly IgG1+, and these were increased following booster vaccination in healthy controls, but not in patients with predominantly antibody deficiency.

Background: Antiviral medications (AV) are available to mitigate mortality, morbidity, and absenteeism associated with influenza. Management of the burden of influenza is a concern to governing organizations, and thus it is important to understand how AVs are used in practice. To address this, the study reviewed recommendations and guidelines for AV use in situations of seasonal, pandemic, and novel/variant influenza from organizations around the world. Methods: Electronic databases, government and international websites, and Google were searched for guidelines and recommendations developed at the national and international levels by governments, intergovernmental organizations, and task forces that identify AV use recommendations. Results: Of 609 documents retrieved from the electronic search and manual review, 57 were included. Neuraminidase inhibitors (NIs) were recommended for use in nearly 80% of guidelines. Oseltamivir or oseltamivir/zanamivir were recommended for use in 38.6% and 40.4% of guidelines, respectively. Most guidelines based their recommendations on explicit evidence, the majority of which cited WHO documents. AV use was recommended for the general population in 42 guidelines; oseltamivir was recommended most commonly for both prophylaxis and treatment. Conclusions: The majority of guidelines covering subpopulations recommended the use of AVs. Details of AV administration (dose, duration, and timing), when reported, were consistent by indication. Guidelines recommending use of adamantanes were either published before 2007 or recommended their use for specific subpopulations. Guidelines were generally consistent in recommending the use of NIs for indication, type of influenza, setting, subpopulation, and evidence used to inform the recommendation.

Studies on the effectiveness of seasonal influenza vaccine can affect an individual's perception of the ability of this vaccine to protect against influenza. However, vaccine effectiveness studies are designed to inform public health decisions rather than for individual decision-making. This overview explains what vaccine effectiveness means and why vaccine effectiveness estimates can vary. Individual variation in the response to seasonal influenza vaccine is based upon risk factors such as age, underlying health conditions, immune status and risk of infection and complications. Therefore, an individual's decision to get vaccinated should be primarily informed by their risk of influenza illness and their risk of transmitting influenza to vulnerable people.

Introduction: Non-small-cell lung cancer outcomes are poor but heterogeneous, even within stage groups. To improve prognostic precision we aimed to develop and validate a simple prognostic model using patient and disease variables. Methods: Prospective registry and study data were analysed using Cox proportional hazards regression to derive a prognostic model (hospital 1, n=695), which was subsequently tested (Harrell’s c-statistic for discrimination and Cox–Snell residuals for calibration) in two independent validation cohorts (hospital 2, n=479 and hospital 3, n=284). Results: The derived Lung Cancer Prognostic Index (LCPI) included stage, histology, mutation status, performance status, weight loss, smoking history, respiratory comorbidity, sex, and age. Two-year overall survival rates according to LCPI in the derivation and two validation cohorts, respectively, were 84, 77, and 68% (LCPI 1: score⩽9); 61, 61, and 42% (LCPI 2: score 10–13); 33, 32, and 14% (LCPI 3: score 14–16); 7, 16, and 5% (LCPI 4: score ⩾15). Discrimination (c-statistic) was 0.74 for the derivation cohort, 0.72 and 0.71 for the two validation cohorts. Conclusions: The LCPI contributes additional prognostic information, which may be used to counsel patients, guide trial eligibility or design, or standardise mortality risk for epidemiological analyses.

The National Advisory Committee on Immunization (NACI) provides expert and evidence-based advice to the Public Health Agency of Canada (PHAC) on the use of human vaccines in Canada. This advice is presented in a variety of publications for different uses. A recent survey identified some confusion regarding the various NACI publication products. The objective of this article is to identify the level of detail and appropriate uses of the different NACI products. NACI statements provide a synthesis of current evidence and expert opinion on new vaccines or new indications for vaccines to inform immunization practices, policies and programs. NACI literature reviews inform new NACI statements and are published after the statement to inform readers about current literature on a specific immunization topic. The Canadian Immunization Guide (CIG) is a practice-oriented guide that synthesizes all the NACI statements and is updated regularly. NACI statement summaries are published in the Canada Communicable Disease Report (CCDR) and provide a high level overview of these statements shortly after they are published. These products provide a variety of options for users to choose how in-depth they wish to explore the evidence base and process for producing recommendations for immunization in Canada.

CONTEXT: Palivizumab prophylaxis is used as passive immunization for respiratory syncytial virus (RSV). However, because of its high cost, the value of this intervention is unclear. OBJECTIVE: To systematically review the cost-effectiveness of palivizumab prophylaxis compared with no prophylaxis in infants DATA SOURCES: Medline, Embase, and Cochrane Library up to August 2018. STUDY SELECTION: Two reviewers independently screened results to include economic evaluations conducted between 2000 and 2018 from Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development countries. DATA EXTRACTION: Two reviewers independently extracted outcomes. Quality appraisal was completed by using the Joanna Briggs Institute checklist. Costs were adjusted to 2017 US dollars. RESULTS: We identified 28 economic evaluations (20 cost-utility analyses and 8 cost-effectiveness analyses); most were from the United States (n = 6) and Canada (n = 5). Study quality was high; 23 studies met >80% of the Joanna Briggs Institute criteria. Palivizumab prophylaxis ranged from a dominant strategy to having an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio of $2 526 203 per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) depending on study perspective and targeted population. From the payer perspective, the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio for preterm infants (29–35 weeks’ gestational age) was between $5188 and $791 265 per QALY, with 90% of estimates LIMITATIONS: Model design heterogeneity, model parameters, and study settings were barriers to definitive conclusions on palivizumab’s economic value. CONCLUSIONS: Palivizumab as RSV prophylaxis was considered cost-effective in prematurely born infants, infants with lung complications, and infants from remote communities.

In the original version of this article unfortunately two authors were missing: Dr. Jurgen Weidemann and Dr. Daniel Berthold. The correct list of authors is presented above.

In lung cancer, outcome measurement has been mostly limited to survival. Proper assessment of the value of lung cancer treatments, and the performance of institutions delivering care, requires more comprehensive measurement of standardised outcomes. The International Consortium for Health Outcomes Measurement convened an international, multidisciplinary working group of patient representatives, medical oncologists, surgeons, radiation oncologists, pulmonologists, palliative care specialists, registry experts and specialist nurses to review existing data and practices. Using a modified Delphi method, the group developed a consensus recommendation (“the set”) on the outcomes most essential to track for patients with lung cancer, along with baseline demographic, clinical and tumour characteristics (case-mix variables) for risk adjustment. The set applies to patients diagnosed with nonsmall cell lung cancer and small cell lung cancer. Our working group recommends the collection of the following outcomes: survival, complications during or within 6 months of treatment and patient-reported domains of health-related quality of life including pain, fatigue, cough and dyspnoea. Case-mix variables were defined to improve interpretation of comparisons. We defined an international consensus recommendation of the most important outcomes for lung cancer patients, along with relevant case-mix variables, and are working to support adoption and reporting of these measures globally., ICHOM Lung Cancer Standard Set of patient-centred outcomes: aligning global efforts to improve lung cancer care http://ow.ly/bFDR300EhY7

We addressed the uncertainty of comorbidity as a prognosticator by evaluating comorbidity and the Simplified Comorbidity Score (SCS) as predictors of overall survival in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).A prospective study included patients in whom NSCLC was diagnosed at an Australian cancer hospital between 2012 and 2014. Patients were assessed for SCS at recruitment and followed up every 3 months until death.The cohort included 633 patients; their median age was 67 years (range 28-93), 63% were male, and 86% were ever-smokers. The median SCS at enrolment was 8 (range 0-19); 20% had an SCS higher than 9, and 11% had an SCS of 0. An SCS higher than 9 was associated with male sex, age older than 75 years, an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher, and fewer cancer treatments. The 1-year overall survival rate was 62% (95% confidence interval: 58-66). In multivariate analysis, the strongest associations with mortality were metastatic disease (hazard ratio [HR] = 2.8, p0.01), Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 or higher (HR = 2.0, p0.01), male sex (HR = 1.6, p0.01), more than 10% weight loss at diagnosis (HR = 1.5, p0.01), and age older than 75 years (HR = 1.5, p = 0.01). An SCS higher than 9 was not associated with overall survival (HR = 1.0, p = 0.8), and the effect of continuous SCS (HR = 1.1, p0.01) was explained by smoking status.In this cohort of patients with NSCLC the SCS was not a clinically significant predictor of overall survival over and above basic patient and disease factors.