Search

Patients with atopic dermatitis (AD) are more likely than the general population to have other type 2 associated conditions, for example, asthma, allergic rhinitis (AR) and food allergy (FA).1,2 Classically, the atopic march is thought to begin with AD and progresses to FA, asthma and AR,1,2 but this may be an oversimplification. This study aimed to describe the epidemiology of type 2 associated conditions included in the atopic march among patients newly diagnosed with AD in a large healthcare provider database in Israel. This retrospective cohort study was performed using the Maccabi Healthcare Services database in Israel, which includes over 2.5 million members. Based on the International Classification of Diseases, 9th revision (ICD-9) diagnosis codes, patients with diagnosed AD during 2000–2019 were identified. The earliest AD diagnosis was defined as the index date and patients had to have been enrolled for ≥12 months pre-index to exclude prevalent AD. Diagnosis data were obtained during 1998–2020 to describe the cumulative prevalence of asthma, AR and FA pre- and post-AD diagnosis (−1, 0, 1, 5, 10 and 20 years) using Kaplan–Meier analysis among patients aged

Introduction Injectable therapies such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and basal insulin (BI) are well-established agents for people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). This study aimed to investigate real-world effectiveness of GLP-1 RAs or BI in adults with T2D poorly controlled on oral antihyperglycemic drugs (OADs). Methods This was a retrospective, observational, longitudinal cohort study of adults with T2D from the US Optum Humedica® database and UK Clinical Practice Research Datalink, who initiated either injectable between January 1, 2010, and June 30, 2016. Baseline characteristics, glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) change, and cumulative percentage reaching HbA1c

Aim To assess the impact of the timing of initiating both basal insulin and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 receptor agonists (GLP‐1 RAs) on reaching glycaemic control targets over 6 and 12 months in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled on oral antihyperglycaemic drugs with an HbA1c of 9% or higher. Methods This retrospective cohort study assessed the impact of the timing of initiating both basal insulin and GLP‐1 RA therapies on reaching glycaemic targets (HbA1c

Introduction:The effectiveness of basal insulin (BI) or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) in providing glycemic control in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) in Japanese routine practice is not well known. This real-world observational study evaluated the probability of achieving glycemic control in Japanese patients with T2D uncontrolled by oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) who initiated BI or GLP-1 RA therapy., Methods:Patients with T2D aged ≥ 18 years initiating BI or GLP-1 RA therapy following treatment with OADs were selected from real-world data (RWD) retrieved from a large electronic medical record database in Japan, using data from 01 January 2010 to 30 June 2019. Patients were required to have glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥ 7% within 90 days prior to the first prescription of BI or GLP-1 RA. The probability of reaching first HbA1c < 7% was assessed over a 24-month period in cohorts of patients who initiated BI (n = 3477) or GLP-1 RA (n = 780) and in subcohorts by number of OADs at baseline (1, 2, or ≥ 3), HbA1c at baseline (≥ 7 to < 8%, ≥ 8 to < 9%, or ≥ 9%), and age (< 65 or ≥ 65 years)., Results:Mean (standard deviation) baseline HbA1c was 9.4% (1.8%) and 8.8% (1.4%) in patients initiating BI or GLP-1 RA therapy, respectively. The cumulative probability of achieving glycemic control was 50.1% with BI and 60.3% with GLP-1 RA therapy, respectively, at 12 months, and 60.8% and 66.6%, respectively, at 24 months. Quarterly (3-month intervals) conditional probabilities of achieving glycemic control decreased over time and were < 10% after 12 months. Patients with more OADs or higher HbA1c at baseline had a lower probability of achieving glycemic control., Conclusion:Among Japanese patients with T2D who initiated BI or GLP-1 RA therapy after treatment with OADs, the probability of reaching first glycemic control diminished over time. Further therapy intensification is warranted in patients who do not achieve glycemic control within 6-12 months with BI or GLP-1 RA, particularly those with high HbA1c or taking multiple OADs.

Introduction When and how to intensify treatment in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D) not achieving glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) targets with oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) in clinical practice remains a matter of clinical preference. This pilot study was conducted using the retrospective observational data from such patients to evaluate the impact on HbA1c of three treatment sequences: simultaneous initiation of basal insulin (BI) and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA; Cohort 1); BI followed by GLP-1 RA initiation within a 90-day timeframe (Cohort 2); or BI followed by GLP-1 RA initiation beyond 90 days (Cohort 3). Methods Data from the regional US electronic medical records database, Research Action for Health Network (REACHnet), were extracted for all patients with T2D aged ≥ 18 years who had encounter dates between January 2011 and August 2017 and ≥ 1 HbA1c laboratory value(s)

Introduction iGlarLixi, the once-daily fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/ml and lixisenatide, robustly improves glycaemic control in adults with type 2 diabetes irrespective of previous treatment [oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs), basal insulin or glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs)]. Sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitors (SGLT2is) are a recommended treatment option for people with type 2 diabetes with cardiovascular disease, kidney disease and/or heart failure because of their cardio- and renoprotective benefits. Herein, we assessed the effects of concomitant iGlarLixi and SGLT2i therapy. Methods We conducted subgroup analyses according to SGLT2i use in: (1) adults with suboptimally controlled type 2 diabetes on GLP-1 RAs and OADs switching to iGlarLixi in the 26-week LixiLan-G randomised controlled trial (RCT; NCT02787551) and (2) adults switching to or adding iGlarLixi in a 6-month, retrospective real-world evidence (RWE) observational study using data from the US Optum-Humedica electronic medical records database. Changes in HbA1c and hypoglycaemia prevalence and event rates were assessed. Results There were no major differences in baseline characteristics for those who initiated iGlarLixi while already using SGLT2i (n = 346) and those initiating iGlarLixi without concomitant SGLT2i therapy (n = 1285). HbA1c reductions from baseline to time of assessment and hypoglycaemia prevalence and event rates were similar for iGlarLixi users regardless of SGLT2i therapy. Conclusion Evidence from an RCT and an RWE analysis supports the efficacy/effectiveness and safety of iGlarLixi when used concomitantly with SGLT2i. Trial Registration NCT02787551. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01180-1., Plain Language Summary People with type 2 diabetes require glucose-lowering drugs to attain and maintain blood glucose control, with many eventually requiring injectable therapies. iGlarLixi combines two injectable therapies (basal insulin glargine and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, lixisenatide) into a single fixed-ratio daily injection and has previously been shown to provide robust improvements in blood glucose control. However, previous studies have not assessed the potential effect that simultaneous use of sodium-glucose co-transporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT2i) therapy may have on iGlarLixi therapy. This is of interest because SGLT2is are a widely used oral blood-glucose-lowering therapy that also have a beneficial effect in people with type 2 diabetes who have cardiovascular or kidney disease or have risk factors for the development or progression of these conditions. Therefore, this study assessed whether there were relevant differences in terms of blood glucose control and safety when initiating iGlarLixi in people treated with SGLT2i versus initiating iGlarLixi in people not receiving SGLT2i. Results showed that iGlarLixi provided similarly good glucose control and safety profiles, regardless of whether SGLT2is were used or not, thereby supporting the simultaneous use of these two therapies. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s13300-021-01180-1.

Aim To investigate the effectiveness of premixed insulin for achieving glycaemic outcomes in clinical practice in the UK. Materials and Methods Electronic medical record data from The Health Improvement Network database were captured for adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) uncontrolled (HbA1c ≥9%) on two or more oral antihyperglycaemic drugs (OADs) initiating premixed insulin. Effectiveness of premixed insulin was assessed by the probability and incidence of achieving glycaemic outcomes (target HbA1c 40 kg/m2 and co‐morbidities including nephropathy and stroke. Conclusions In people with uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c ≥9%), glycaemic outcome achievement on premixed insulin was low at 6 months with little additional clinical benefit beyond 12 months, suggesting a high unmet need for early, timely treatment changes with more effective, simpler therapies.

Using the Clinical Practice Research Datalink, adults diagnosed with T2DM newly initiated with a basal long/intermediate-acting insulin from January 2004 to December 2016 were identified. First change or add on of short or premix insulin and/or OADs was defined as intensification. Patients were categorized into three groups; uncontrolled glycaemia at baseline (≥7% HbA1c) and early (within 1-year) intensifiers, and uncontrolled glycaemia at baseline and delayed (>1-year) intensifiers and uncontrolled-non-intensifiers as a reference groups. A total of n=8,538 patients were included; 32.95% (n=2,813) were uncontrolled-glycaemic-early intensifiers, 28.91% (n=2,468) were uncontrolled glycaemic-delayed intensifiers, and 38.15% (n=3,257) were non-intensifiers. Majority of the early and delayed intensified patients were males (54.60% and 57.41% respectively) and the average age was 62.40years. Non-intensifiers were older (67.72 years) and had a greater number of risk factors. Median baseline HbA1c was 85.90mmol/mol [10.01%] (IQR, 73.9-101.0 mmol/mol; 8.91-11.39%) and 82.50mmol/mol [9.70%] (IQR, 71.60-96.70mmol/mol, 8.70-11.00%) in the early and delayed treatment intensified group respectively. Early treatment intensification within 1-year post basal insulin therapy was linked to 18% (HR CI: 0.65, 1.03), 23% (HR CI: 0.58, 1.02) and 28% (HR CI: 0.58, 0.93) reduction in the risk of HF, MI and stroke respectively. CVE risk was also reduced in the delayed versus non-intensified group. In conclusion, large proportion of patients remain non-intensified post basal insulin despite poor glycemic control, timely intensification in primary care is thus central in minimising CVE complications. Disclosure M. Adan: None. S. Seidu: Advisory Panel; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Servier. Board Member; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Amgen, Lilly Diabetes, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. K. Khunti: Advisory Panel; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Berlin-Chemie AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Menarini Group, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. Board Member; Self; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi-Aventis. Consultant; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Berlin-Chemie AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Menarini Group, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Amgen, AstraZeneca, Bayer AG, Berlin-Chemie AG, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Menarini Group, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Roche Pharma, Sanofi-Aventis, Servier. F. Zaccardi: Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Napp Pharmaceuticals. C.L. Gillies: None. R. Lubwama: Employee; Self; Sanofi US. A.H. Boss: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. T.A. Dex: Consultant; Self; Sanofi US. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Bayer Healthcare Pharmaceuticals Inc., Pfizer Inc., Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd.

iGlarLixi, the once-daily fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine 100 U/mL and lixisenatide, has been shown to robustly improve glycemic control in adults with T2D. To assess the effects of iGlarLixi with SGLT2i in T2D, we conducted subgroup analyses according to SGLT2i use in the following populations: 1) adults uncontrolled on GLP-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RAs) and oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs) switching to iGlarLixi in the 26-week LixiLan-G RCT (NCT02787551) and 2) adults switching to or adding iGlarLixi in a 6-month, retrospective real-world observational study using data from the U.S. Optum-Humedica electronic medical records database. Endpoints included change in HbA1c and hypoglycemia incidence and event rates. Across the studies, there were no major differences in baseline characteristics for those who initiated iGlarLixi while already using SGLT2i (N=346) and those initiating iGlarLixi without background SGLT2i use (N=1285). HbA1c reductions from baseline to week 26 and hypoglycemia incidence and event rates were similar for iGlarLixi regardless of SGLT2i use (Table). In conclusion, evidence from both RCT and real-world clinical settings support the efficacy and safety of iGlarLixi when used in combination with SGLT2i. Disclosure J. Rosenstock: Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Oramed Pharmaceuticals, PegBio Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., REMD Biotherapeutics. Other Relationship; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Intarcia Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. A. Ali: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Gelesis. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Amarin Corporation. J.J. Meier: Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. F. Giorgino: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk Inc., Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi. Consultant; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., LifeScan, Inc., MedImmune, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., Roche Diabetes Care, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, LifeScan, Inc., Takeda Development Centre Europe Ltd. C. Guja: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Sanofi. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Servier. M. Prazny: Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Roche Diabetes Care. Other Relationship; Self; Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Medtronic, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi, Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. R. Lubwama: Employee; Self; Sanofi US. E. Souhami: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Sanofi. L. Blonde: Advisory Panel; Self; AstraZeneca, Gilead Sciences, Inc. Consultant; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC., Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Sanofi. Funding Sanofi

NICE guidelines suggest premix as a treatment option for people with T2D with HbA1c ≥9 % uncontrolled by ≥2 oral antidiabetic drugs (OADs). This retrospective cohort study explored real-world evidence for glycemic control with premix. UK electronic medical record data from THIN database were captured for adults with T2D uncontrolled (HbA1c ≥9 %) on ≥2 OADs initiating premix (index date) from 1/1/2010 to 12/31/2016. Baseline data were collected 12 months pre-index and outcomes followed for 24 months. Glycemic control was assessed by time to first achievement of HbA1c target Disclosure E.B. Jude: Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. Other Relationship; Self; Lilly Diabetes, Menarini Group. A. Ali: Advisory Panel; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Napp Pharmaceuticals, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Gelesis. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Eli Lilly and Company, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Amarin Corporation. R. Emral: Advisory Panel; Self; Lilly Diabetes, Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi-Aventis. N. Nanda: Advisory Panel; Self; Novartis AG. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; AstraZeneca, Novo Nordisk Inc., Pfizer Inc., Sanofi. R. Lubwama: Employee; Self; Sanofi US. K.D. Palmer: Employee; Self; Sanofi. A. Shaunik: None. P. Raskin: None. F. Gomez-Peralta: Advisory Panel; Self; Abbott, Menarini Group, Novartis AG, Sanofi. Speaker’s Bureau; Self; Abbott, Boehringer Ingelheim International GmbH, Lilly Diabetes, Novartis AG, Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. C. Trescoli: None. Funding Sanofi

Injectable therapy initiation in T2D is often delayed. This retrospective cohort study evaluated the impact of the timing of initiating both basal insulin and GLP-1 RA in people with uncontrolled T2D (HbA1c ≥9 %) on OADs within 12 months (Optum Humedica database of electronic medical records and claims; 1/1/2011 to 6/30/2017). Study cohorts were defined by the days between initiating the first and second injectable: cohort A ≤30 (simultaneous); B 31-90; C 91-180; D 181-270; E 271-360 (sequential). Endpoints: proportion achieving HbA1c In summary, despite higher baseline HbA1c, addition of a second injectable agent within 90 days of the first led to significantly better glycemic control at 12 months than postponing addition to later in the year in uncontrolled T2D. Disclosure J. Rosenstock: Research Support; Self; AstraZeneca, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Genentech, Inc., GlaxoSmithKline plc., Lexicon Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Oramed Pharmaceuticals, PegBio Co., Ltd., Pfizer Inc., REMD Biotherapeutics. Other Relationship; Self; Applied Therapeutics, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Intarcia Therapeutics, Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. F. Ampudia Blasco: None. R. Lubwama: Employee; Self; Sanofi US. X.V. Peng: Employee; Self; Sanofi. A.H. Boss: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. L. Shi: None. V. Fonseca: Consultant; Self; Abbott, Asahi Kasei Corporation, AstraZeneca, Bayer Inc., Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi. Research Support; Self; Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Amgen, Bravo4health. Funding Sanofi

iGlarLixi, a fixed-ratio combination of insulin glargine U100 (iGlar-100) and the GLP-1 RA lixisenatide, has been available in the U.S. for clinical use in patients (pts) with T2D since 01/2017. This analysis provides baseline characteristics of iGlarLixi pts and prescribers in a real-world setting from a U.S. electronic medical records database. Pts initiating iGlarLixi from 01/2017 were reviewed using the U.S. Optum Humedica database, which includes data from approximately 85 million pt lives (insured and uninsured). Pts with at least 6 months’ data prior to iGlarLixi initiation (07/2016) were included. Baseline characteristics and clinical variables using ICD-9-CM/ICD-10-CM and prescription codes were extracted. Among 1075 total pts initiating iGlarLixi, mean age was 56.5 years (SD 10.6, range 22-89); highest number of pts (41%) were 55-64 years; 53% were female. If noted, race was 76% Caucasian, 16% African American, 1% Asian, and 8% Other/Unknown; 6% were of Hispanic ethnicity. Mean HbA1c was 9.1% (SD 2.0, median 8.8); distribution: ≥7% (80%), ≥8% (60%), and ≥9% (41%). Mean BMI (kg/m2) was 36.1 (SD 6.9, median 35.4); BMI was ≥30 for 50% and 30-60. Mean Diabetes Complications Severity Index (DCSI) score was 2.4 (SD 1.7); 35% had DCSI ≥3. Previous basal insulin (BI) therapy (± OADs) was used by 41%; 14% were on GLP-1 RAs (± OADs); 15% were on BI + GLP-1 RA free combination (± OADs); 15% were on at least one OAD, without BI or GLP-1 RA. OADs (≥1) were used by 72% of pts; 38% were on ≥2 OADs. The highest number of pts were from the Midwest (61%), followed by the South (27%). Over 60% of prescribers were mid-level/family practice/internal medicine; 15% were endocrinologists. In conclusion, iGlarLixi is used for pts with a wide range of baseline demographic and clinical characteristics in widespread U.S. geographic regions. The largest use was noted in pts with high HbA1c and obesity, and most pts had previous therapies of BI or GLP-1 RAs and OADs. Disclosure J.P. Frias: Advisory Panel; Self; Becton, Dickinson and Company, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Inc., Sanofi. Consultant; Self; Echosens, Genentech, Inc., Johnson & Johnson Diabetes Institute, Novo Nordisk Inc., Zafgen, Inc. Research Support; Self; AbbVie Inc., Akcea Therapeutics, Allergan, Amgen Inc., AstraZeneca, Bayer US, Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, Cirius Therapeutics, Elcelyx Therapeutics, Inc., Eli Lilly and Company, Enanta Pharmaceuticals, Inc., GENFIT, Intarcia Therapeutics, Inc., Intercept Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Ionis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Merck & Co., Inc., NGM Biopharmaceuticals, Novartis Pharmaceuticals Corporation, Novo Nordisk A/S, Oramed Pharmaceuticals, Pfizer Inc., Sanofi, TaiwanJ Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd., Theracos, Inc. Speaker's Bureau; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Sanofi. A.H. Boss: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Novo Nordisk A/S, Sanofi. R. Lubwama: Employee; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Sanofi. A. Shaunik: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Funding Sanofi

This real-world retrospective observational analysis was conducted using data from REACHnet, a U.S. regional electronic medical records (EMR) database. Glycemic outcomes after simultaneous or sequential initiation of basal insulin (BI) and a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1 RA) were evaluated in patients with T2D uncontrolled (A1C ≥7.0%) on oral antidiabetes drugs (OADs). Three patient cohorts were defined: simultaneous BI and GLP-1 RA initiation (Cohort 1; n=109); initiation of BI followed by a GLP-1 RA with a gap of ≤90 days (Cohort 2; n=301); and initiation of BI followed by a GLP-1 RA with a gap of >90 days (Cohort 3; n=459). Baseline mean A1C was very similar across the cohorts (10.3%, 10.3%, and 10.2% in Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively), as were comorbidities including dyslipidemia, hypertension, and obesity. Mean A1C decreased in all 3 cohorts in the 12 months from the date of first BI injection. The greatest mean A1C reductions occurred within 6 months of simultaneous administration (Cohort 1: -2.18%), followed by addition of a GLP-1 RA within 90 days (Cohort 2: -1.77%) and after 90 days (Cohort 3: -1.24%). Results at 12 months were Cohort 1: -1.66%; Cohort 2: -1.46%; and Cohort 3: -1.32%. Persistence (i.e., non-discontinuation of index treatments) at 12 months was 74.3%, 73.8%, and 80.0% in Cohorts 1, 2, and 3, respectively. Simultaneous initiation resulted in more patients achieving A1C In conclusion, this retrospective analysis of real-world EMR data in patients with T2D uncontrolled on OADs suggests that simultaneous initiation of BI and a GLP-1 RA resulted in significantly better glycemic control than sequential initiation with a gap of >90 days. Disclosure X.V. Peng: Employee; Self; Sanofi. Stock/Shareholder; Spouse/Partner; AbbVie Inc. Stock/Shareholder; Self; AbbVie Inc., Sanofi. R. Ayyagari: Consultant; Self; Sanofi US. Other Relationship; Self; Various pharmaceutical companies. R. Lubwama: Employee; Self; Merck & Co., Inc., Sanofi. M.J. Van Vleet: Employee; Self; Sanofi US. L. Shi: None. E.G. Price-Haywood: None. P. Hollander: Advisory Panel; Self; Novo Nordisk Inc. V. Fonseca: Board Member; Self; American Association of Clinical Endocrinologists. Consultant; Self; Abbott, Asahi Kasei Corporation, Novo Nordisk Inc., Sanofi US, Takeda Pharmaceutical Company Limited. Research Support; Self; Bayer US. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Amgen Inc., BRAVO4HEALTH, Mellitus Health. Funding Sanofi U.S.

Aim Data on prevalence of chronic kidney disease (CKD) among US adults with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and cardiovascular diseases (CVD) are limited. The aim of this study was to provide such estimates for T2D, both overall and in those with CVD. Materials and methods Using the NHANES 2007–2014 data, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of an adult sample with diagnosed and undiagnosed T2D, aged ≥18 years. CVD was defined based on self-reported personal interview data on a broad range of health conditions—congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, stroke, or heart attack. T2D was defined as diagnosed T2D (self-reported provider diagnosis) and undiagnosed T2D (FPG ≥126 mg/dL or HbA1c ≥ 6.5% without self-reported diagnosis). Participants who started insulin within a year of T2D diagnosis, or were pregnant at the time of health examination were excluded. Appropriate sample weights were used to provide a national estimate. Results The prevalence of moderate to severe renal impairment based on eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73 m2 among T2D was 18.0%. The prevalence of mild renal impairment was 36.9%: 28.3% with UACR 300 mg/g. For T2D and CVD subgroup, the prevalence was 33.6% for moderate to severe renal impairment and 42.8% for mild renal impairment. Conclusions This study confirms the high prevalence of CKD in patients with multiple comorbidities: T2D and CVD. It also provides estimates of the prevalence of CKD categories based on KDIGO 2012 classification for US adults with T2D.

Data on the prevalence of CKD among U.S. adults with T2D and CVD are limited. The aim of this study was to provide such estimates for T2D, both overall and in those with CVD. Using the NHANES 2007-2014 data, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of an adult sample with diagnosed and undiagnosed T2D (n=3271), aged ≥18 years. Appropriate sample weights were used to obtain a national estimate. Results of prevalence of CKD in U.S. adults with T2D are presented in Table 1. The prevalence of moderately to severely decreased renal impairment based on eGFR < 60 ml/min/1.73m2 (Stage 3-5) was 18.0%. The prevalence of mildly decreased renal impairment (Stage 2, eGFR=60-90 ml/min/1.73m2) was 36.9%, including 28.3% with UACR300mg/g. For T2D and CVD subgroup (n=837), the prevalence of moderately to severely decreased renal impairment was 33.6% (Stage 3a: 16.1%; Stage 3b: 12.3%; Stage 4 or 5: 5.2%). The prevalence of mildly decreased renal impairment (Stage 2) was 42.8%, including 29.0% with UACR300mg/g. This study confirms the high prevalence of CKD in patients with multiple comorbidities: T2D and CVD. It also provides insights into prevalence of all CKD categories based on KDIGO 2012 classification for U.S. adults with T2D, both overall and those with CVD. Disclosure T. Wang: Employee; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Employee; Spouse/Partner; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Y. Xi: None. R.N. Lubwama: None. C. Koro: Employee; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Stock/Shareholder; Self; GlaxoSmithKline plc..

Overall prevalence of CKD in the U.S. adult general population was estimated to be 14.8%. But data on the prevalence of CKD among CVD population are limited. Using the NHANES 2007-2014 data, we conducted a cross-sectional analysis of an adult sample with self-reported CVD (n=2325), aged ≥18 years, to assess prevalence of CKD in U.S. adults with CVD using KDIGO 2012 classification. Participants with CVD were identified based on self-reported personal interview data on a broad range of health conditions—congestive heart failure, coronary heart disease, angina, stroke, or heart attack. Appropriate sample weights were used to provide a national estimate. Results of prevalence of CKD in U.S. adults with self-reported CVD are presented in Table 1. The prevalence of moderately to severely decreased renal impairment based on eGFR below 60 ml/min/1.73m2 was 24.9%: 14.1% with Stage 3a, 7.8% with Stage 3b, and 3.0% with Stage 4 or 5. The prevalence of mildly decreased renal impairment (stage 2, eGFR=60-90 ml/min/1.73m2) was 45.2%: 36.8% with UACR300mg/g (severely increased albuminuria). This study confirms the high prevalence of CKD in CVD, and provides insights into distribution by CKD categories based on the KDIGO 2012 classification. Disclosure T. Wang: Employee; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Stock/Shareholder; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Employee; Spouse/Partner; Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Inc.. Y. Xi: None. R.N. Lubwama: None. C. Koro: Employee; Self; Merck & Co., Inc.. Stock/Shareholder; Self; GlaxoSmithKline plc..