Search

Purpose AT04A and AT06A are two AFFITOPE® peptide vaccine candidates being developed for the treatment of hypercholesterolemia by inducing proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9)-specific antibodies. This study aimed to investigate safety, tolerability, antibody development, and reduction of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) following four subcutaneous immunizations. Methods This phase I, single-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study was conducted in a total of 72 healthy subjects with a mean fasting LDLc level at baseline of 117.1 mg/dL (range 77–196 mg/dL). Each cohort enrolled 24 subjects to receive three priming immunizations at weeks 0, 4, and 8 and to receive a single booster immunization at week 60 of either AT04A, AT06A, or placebo. In addition to safety (primary objective), the antigenic peptide- and PCSK9-specific antibody response and the impact on LDLc were evaluated over a period of 90 weeks. Results The most common systemic treatment-related adverse events (AEs) reported were fatigue, headache, and myalgia in 75% of subjects in the AT06A group and 58% and 46% of subjects in the placebo and AT04A groups, respectively. Injection site reactions (ISR) representing 63% of all treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), were transient and mostly of mild or moderate intensity and rarely severe (3%). Both active treatments triggered a robust, long-lasting antibody response towards the antigenic peptides used for immunization that optimally cross-reacted with the target epitope on PCSK9. In the AT04A group, a reduction in serum LDLc was observed with a mean peak reduction of 11.2% and 13.3% from baseline compared to placebo at week 20 and 70 respectively, and over the whole study period, the mean LDLc reduction for the AT04A group vs. placebo was −7.2% (95% CI [−10.4 to −3.9], P Conclusions Although both AT04A and AT06 were safe and immunogenic, only AT04A demonstrated significant LDLc-lowering activity, justifying further development. Trial registration EudraCT: 2015-001719-11. ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT02508896.

Aims Small-interfering RNA (siRNA)-based targeting of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) represents a novel therapeutic approach that may provide a convenient, infrequent, and safe dosing schedule to robustly lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C). Given the long duration of action, however, establishing safety in particular with respect to immunogenicity is of paramount importance. In earlier clinical studies of other RNA-targeted treatment approaches (antisense oligonucleotide therapy) immunological and haematological adverse effects, in particular thrombocytopenia and pro-inflammatory effects, have been reported. Here, we present the pre-specified safety analysis from ORION-1 evaluating platelets, immune cells, immunological markers, antidrug antibodies, and clinical immunogenicity adverse events (AEs) under PCSK9 siRNA treatment with inclisiran. Methods and results The pre-specified safety analysis from ORION-1 was performed in six different inclisiran dosing regimens in patients at high risk of cardiovascular disease with elevated LDL-C levels. Patients received either a single dose (SD: 200 mg, n = 60; 300 mg, n = 62 or 500 mg, n = 66) or double-dose starting regimen (DD: 100 mg, n = 62; 200 mg, n = 63; or 300 mg, n = 61 on days 1 and 90) of inclisiran or placebo (SD: n = 65; DD: n = 62). The effects of inclisiran on haematological parameters including platelet counts, lymphocytes, and monocytes as well as on the immune markers interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumour necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) were examined after 180 days. Immunogenicity was further evaluated by analysis of anti-drug-antibodies (ADAs) towards inclisiran in 6068 study samples and by careful analysis of immunogenicity AEs as part of the pharmacovigilance strategy. At day 180, no significant alterations of platelet counts were observed in any of the dosing groups (change from baseline, SD: 200 mg: 0.8%; 300 mg: −0.5%; 500 mg: −1.8%; DD: 100 mg: 1.3%; 200 mg: −0.5%; 300 mg: 1.0%; no significant difference for any group as compared with placebo). No significant effects on other immune cells, including leucocytes, monocytes, or neutrophils were detected. Notably, no significant increase of inflammatory biomarkers (IL-6 or TNF-α) with either the SD or DD regimen became evident. There was no evidence for immunogenicity based on ADA level analysis and careful review of clinical immunogenicity AEs in none of the treatment regimens. Conclusion In this pre-specified safety analysis of ORION-1 for the siRNA therapeutic inclisiran, no adverse effects on measures of inflammation or immune activation nor adverse effects on platelets or clinical immunogenicity AEs were observed over at least 6-month treatment. These safety findings in the largest analysis of an RNAi study in humans to date provide strong reassurance about the safety of inclisiran and the potential of cardiovascular RNA-targeted therapies.

Background: There is a lack of large-scale data on the clinical and genotype characteristics of homozygous familial hypercholesterolemia (HoFH) patients in Asia. Objective: To define the characteristics of phenotypic and genetic HoFH probands from mainland China. Methods: We collected data from patients with suspected HoFH from ten clinical hospitals across mainland China from 2003 to 2019. Clinical data and DNA testing were obtained in all patients. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to generate survival curves, and the groups were compared with the log-rank test. Results: A total of 108 unrelated probands with suspected HoFH (mean age 14.9 years) were included. The three most common variants were W483X (c.1448 G>A), A627T (c.1879 G>A), H583Y (c.1747 C>T). The majority (64.8%) were compound heterozygotes (n = 70), 23 (21.3%) were true HoFH patients. True HoFH showed higher LDL-C levels compared to compound HoFH (16.8±3.6 mmol/L vs. 15.0±3.1 mmol/L, P = 0.022). During follow-up, only 21.2% patients exhibited an LDL-C reduction of more than 50%. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the true HoFH probands had significantly worse survival rates compared to other genotype probands (13-year survival; 20.3% vs. 76.7%, respectively; P = 0.016). In addition, true HoFH shows that 2.8-fold (P = 0.022) increase any death and 3.0-fold (P = 0.023) increase cardiovascular death risk in relative to other FH. Conclusions: This report shows that HoFH has devastating consequences, and that patients are often only diagnosed after they have been exposed to severely elevated LDL-C for years. Systematic screening and early intensive treatment are an absolute requirement for these young individuals with HoFH.

Statin therapy has delivered tremendous value to society by improving the burden of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease. Nonetheless, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease remains the leading cause of death globally. Technological advances such as in the field of genomics have revolutionized drug discovery and development and have revealed novel therapeutic targets to lower low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C), as well as other detrimental lipids and lipoproteins. Therapeutic LDL-C lowering prevents atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease with an effect size proportional to absolute LDL-C reductions and time of exposure. This understanding supports the notion that reducing cumulative LDL-C exposure should be a key therapeutic target. PCSK9 (proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9) inhibiting monoclonal antibodies provides the possibility of reducing LDL-C to very low levels. Novel therapeutic platforms such as RNA inhibition present opportunities to combine robust lipid lowering with infrequent dosing regimens, introducing therapies with vaccine-like properties. The position of lipid-lowering therapies with targets other than LDL-C, such as Lp(a) [lipoprotein(a)], TRL (triglyceride-rich lipoproteins), and remnant cholesterol, will likely be determined by the results of ongoing clinical trials. Current evidence suggests that reducing Lp(a) or TRLs could attenuate atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease risk in specific categories of patients. This review provides an overview of the latest therapeutic developments, focusing on their mechanisms, efficacy, and safety.

Introduction Inclisiran, an investigational siRNA, has been shown to effectively and durably lower LDL-C in Phase 3 trials. Inter-individual variability in LDL-C reductions has been documented for statin therapy and ezetimibe. Purpose To evaluate the inter-individual variability in LDL-C lowering with inclisiran. Methods The Phase 3 ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials randomized patients with established ASCVD (or risk-equivalents) who had LDL-C >70 mg/dl despite maximally tolerated statins to inclisiran or placebo (1:1). Inclisiran sodium 300 mg was administered s.c. at baseline, three months later, then every six months. Co-primary endpoints were the LDL-C reduction from baseline to Day 510 and the time adjusted average % change in LDL-C reduction after Day 90 and up to Day 540. Measures of response variability were pre-specified secondary endpoints. This analysis examines the inter-individual variability of LDL-C reductions at day 510 using pooled data from both trials. Results The analysis included 3178 individuals (92% on statins). At Day 90, 97% of inclisiran-treated patients had an LDL-C reduction. At Day 510, the median percent reduction in LDL-C levels from baseline was 57.3% in the inclisiran group (interquartile range, 44%-70%). An LDL-C reduction ≥50% was reached by 1359 (86.6%) inclisiran-treated patients versus 97 (6.2%) placebo patients at any visit (odds ratio [OR] 97.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 76–126). An LDL-C reduction ≥30% was reached by 1523 (97.0%) inclisiran-treated patients versus 371 (23.7%) placebo patients (OR 104.5, 95% CI 76–143). At Day 510, 921 patients (65.1%) in the inclisiran group had a reduction ≥50% in LDL-C compared to 34 patients (2.4%) in the placebo group, and 1228 (86.8%) had a reduction ≥30% compared to 148 (10.5%), respectively. Among placebo-treated patients, there was a substantial proportion with notable increases in LDL-C at Day 510 (figure). Conclusion In Phase 3 trials, inclisiran on top of maximally tolerated statins provided reliable, consistent and durable reductions in LDL-C. A large percentage of subjects randomized to inclisiran achieved substantial reductions (>50%) in LDL-C and nearly all achieved at least a 30% reduction suggesting inclisiran is potentially a promising novel therapy for patients needing sustained LDL-C reductions. Waterfall plot of pooled trials Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The Medicines Company

Introduction Statin-associated side effects prevent a substantial proportion of patients from being adequately treated with statin therapy and achieving adequate LDL-C reductions. Phase 3 trials showed that inclisiran, a new siRNA, durably lowers LDL-C by ≥50% on top of maximally tolerated statin therapy. Purpose To evaluate inclisiran's tolerability and LDL-C lowering effects among individuals who were not receiving statin therapy mainly because of statin intolerance. Methods The Phase 3 ORION-10 and ORION-11 trials randomized patients with established ASCVD (or risk-equivalents) with LDL-C >70 mg/dl despite maximally tolerated statins to inclisiran or placebo (1:1). Inclisiran sodium 300 mg was administered s.c. at baseline, three months later, then every six months. The primary efficacy endpoints were % change in LDL-C from baseline to Day 510 and time adjusted % change in LDL-C from baseline after Day 90 and up to Day 540. Absolute LDL-C reductions were secondary endpoints. This analysis included individuals who were not on statin therapy at baseline. Results The trials included 252 (7.9% of the pooled trial populations; mean age 68; male 62%; lipid-lowering therapy 28%). AE rates and LDL-C reductions are shown in the Table. Overall, 12 (4.7%) patients had myalgia (4.8% in the inclisiran groups, 4.7% in the placebo groups). There were 8 discontinuations in the inclisiran groups (6.5%) and 3 in the placebo groups (2.3%). The placebo-adjusted mean reduction in LDL-C at Day 510 was 45.8%, an absolute reduction of 68.0 mg/dL (p Conclusion Among statin intolerant individuals in ORION-10 and 11, inclisiran potently and durably lowered LDL-C with an adverse event profile comparable to placebo. Inclisiran may represent a new and potent therapeutic option for patients with elevated LDL-C unable to tolerate statins. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding source: Private company. Main funding source(s): The Medicines Company

Objective: To investigate the pharmacodynamic properties of inclisiran, a small interfering RNA targeting proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9), in individuals with normal renal function and renal impairment (RI). Patients and Methods: The analysis included participants with normal renal function and mild, moderate, and severe RI from the phase 1 ORION-7 renal study (n=31) and the phase 2 ORION-1 study (n=247) who received 300 mg of inclisiran sodium or placebo. Results: In ORION-7, PCSK9 values were reduced at day 60 in the normal renal function group (68.1%±12.4%), mild RI group (74.2%±12.3%), moderate RI group (79.8%±4.9%), and severe RI group (67.9%±16.4%) (P

Background: The ORION-1 trial (Trial to Evaluate the Effect of ALN-PCSSC Treatment on Low Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol [LDL-C]) demonstrated that inclisiran, an siRNA therapeutic that targets protease proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 mRNA within hepatocytes, produces significant low-density lipoprotein cholesterol reduction. The effects of inclisiran on other lipids are less well described. Methods: ORION-1 was a phase 2 trial assessing 6 different inclisiran dosing regimens versus placebo. Participants with elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol despite receiving maximally tolerated statin therapy received a single-dose (200, 300, or 500 mg) or 2-dose starting regimen (100, 200, or 300 mg on days 1 and 90) of inclisiran or placebo. This prespecified analysis reports the percentage reductions in non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (non–HDL-C), apolipoprotein (apo) B, very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, lipoprotein(a), triglycerides, HDL-C, and apo A1 at the primary efficacy time point (day 180) with mixed-effect models for repeated measures. Additional prespecified analyses report time course of changes from baseline at each visit to day 210, interindividual variation in response, and lipid goal attainment. Results: The mean age of the 501 participants was 63 years, 65% were male, 69% had atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, 73% used statins, and mean low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was 128 mg/dL. A single dose of inclisiran reduced apo B, non–HDL-C, and very-low-density lipoprotein cholesterol over 210 days. A second dose of inclisiran provided additional lowering of these lipids. At day 180, non–HDL-C was lowered dose-dependently: by 25% from 148±43 to 110±45 mg/dL in the 200-mg single-dose group and by 46% from 161±58 to 91±58 mg/dL in the 2-dose 300-mg group. For the same dosing regimens, apo B was reduced by 23% from 101±23 to 78±29 mg/dL and by 41% from 106±31 to 65±33 mg/dL ( P Conclusions: Inclisiran produces significant and prolonged reductions in atherogenic lipoproteins, suggesting that inhibiting the synthesis of protease proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 through siRNA may be a viable alternative to other approaches that target protease proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9. Clinical Trial Registration: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov . Unique identifier: NCT02597127.

Purpose of review This review describes the pivotal role of genetic insights and technologies in the discovery of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and the rapid development of PCSK9 inhibitors - a revolutionary new class of lipid-lowering agents. Recent findings PCSK9 was discovered as a the third gene implicated in familial hypercholesterolemia. Population genetics studies, enabled by technological advances, were instrumental in validating PCSK9 as a therapeutic target. Monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 were introduced in the clinic after an unprecedently rapid development path, in which clinical trial results confirmed that these drugs robustly lower cholesterol and improve clinical outcomes regardless of disease indication or background therapy. New strategies to PCSK9 inhibition are underway and have delivered promising preliminary results, including inhibition of PCSK9 synthesis by targeting the cellular gene expression machinery and vaccination. The future will tell whether directly targeting the genome through editing techniques will ultimately enable us to virtually eliminate many of the traditional CVD risk factors. Summary The extraordinary PCSK9 narrative highlights the opportunities offered by genetics-driven drug development and holds valuable lessons for future development programs.

Clinical trials have unequivocally shown that inhibition of proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) efficaciously and safely prevents cardiovascular events by lowering levels of LDL cholesterol. PCSK9 in the circulation is derived mainly from the liver, but the protein is also expressed in the pancreas, the kidney, the intestine and the central nervous system. Although PCSK9 modulates cholesterol metabolism by regulating LDL receptor expression in the liver, in vitro and in vivo studies have suggested that PCSK9 is involved in various other physiological processes. Although therapeutic PCSK9 inhibition could theoretically have undesired effects by interfering with these non-cholesterol-related processes, studies of individuals with genetically determined reduced PCSK9 function and clinical trials of PCSK9 inhibitors have not revealed clinically meaningful adverse consequences of almost completely eradicating PCSK9 from the circulation. The clinical implications of PCSK9 functions beyond lipid metabolism in terms of wanted or unwanted effects of therapeutic PCSK9 inhibition therefore appear to be limited. The objective of this Review is to describe the physiological role of PCSK9 beyond the LDL receptor to provide a rational basis for monitoring the effects of PCSK9 inhibition as these drugs gain traction in the clinic.

Background PCSK9 inhibitors and statins both lower LDL-C by increasing LDL-receptor (LDLR) function. PCSK9 inhibitors lower Lp(a) by 20–30%, whereas statins do not lower Lp(a). The mechanism by which PCSK9 inhibitors lower Lp(a) is unclear. We assessed the role of the LDLR in Lp(a) reductions produced by inclisiran, an siRNA which prevents hepatic synthesis of PCSK9. Methods ORION-1 was a phase 2 trial of inclisiran in subjects at high ASCVD risk with elevated LDL-C on optimized statin therapy. Subjects received one dose of inclisiran (200, 300, or 500 mg) or two doses at days 1 and 90 (100, 200, or 300 mg). We assessed the correlations between % change in Lp(a) and LDL-C at Day 180 for the inclisiran groups using Spearman correlation coefficients. We additionally assessed the correlation between % change in Lp(a) and absolute change in LDL-C as a proxy for LDLR expression. Lp(a) was measured using an isoform-independent assay and LDL-C with β-quantification. Results ORION-1 included 501 subjects; mean age 63; 65% male; 73% on statins. Median baseline Lp(a) was 37.0 nmol/l (IQR: 11.5–142.0 nmol/l), median LDL-C was 117.0 (IQR: 92.5–149.5 mg/dL). Inclisiran dose-dependently lowered Lp(a) by 14% to 26%. Overall, there was a significant but weak correlation between % change in Lp(a) LDL-C (Spearman coefficient 0.35, p Correlation coefficients LDL-C – Lp(a) Single-dose groups Two-dose groups Inclisiran overall 200 mg (n=60) 300 mg (n=60) 500 mg (n=60) 100 mg (n=59) 200 mg (n=60) 300 mg (n=59) Lp(a) ∼ % change LDL-C 0.22 0.26 0.22 0.29 0.47 0.51 0.35 Lp(a) ∼ absolute change LDL-C 0.35 0.12 0.04 0.22 0.45 0.24 0.27 Lp(a) ∼ % change LDL-C - Statin users 0.16 0.28 0.28 0.31 0.45 0.55 0.37 Lp(a) ∼ % change LDL-C - Non statin users 0.80 -0.08 0.09 0.10 0.63 0.09 0.21 Conclusion The dose-dependent correlation between % changes in LDL-C and Lp(a) suggests that the LDLR may be partially responsible for Lp(a) reductions produced by inclisiran. The numerically stronger correlation in statin-users supports the idea that LDL-C may compete with Lp(a) for LDLR binding especially at low LDL-C levels. Acknowledgement/Funding The Medicines Company

Importance: Sustained reductions in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) with lipid-lowering therapies that require frequent dosing are reliant on patient adherence, and poor adherence is associated with worse clinical outcomes. Objective: To determine whether inclisiran, a small interfering RNA, reduces mean LDL-C exposure with an infrequent dosing regimen. Design, Setting, and Participants: Prespecified analysis of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled multicenter phase 2 clinical trial. Participants were followed up monthly for LDL-C levels and proprotein convertase subtilisin-kexin type 9 (PCSK9) measurements as well as safety until their LDL-C levels had returned to within 20% of their change from baseline (maximum 360 days). The study included patients with elevated LDL-C despite maximally tolerated statin therapy. Data were analyzed between January 11, 2016, and June 7, 2017. Interventions: One dose (200, 300, or 500 mg on day 1) or 2 doses (100, 200, or 300 mg on days 1 and 90) of inclisiran sodium or placebo. Main Outcomes and Measures: Duration of time to return to within 20% of change from baseline for LDL-C levels and time-averaged LDL-C reductions over 1 year. Results: At baseline, among the 501 participants, 65% were men (n = 326 of 501), mean age was 63 years, 6% had familial hypercholesterolemia (n = 28 of 501), and 69% had established ASCVD (n = 347 of 501). Baseline LDL-C was 128 mg/dL among 501 randomized participants. The percentage of participants who were followed up to day 360 because their LDL-C levels had not returned to within 20% of their change from baseline ranged from 48.3% to 65.0% for those receiving a single dose and between 55.9% and 83.1% of those receiving 2 doses, with similar effects observed for PCSK9. Time-averaged reduction in LDL-C levels over 1 year after a single dose ranged from 29.5% to 38.7% (P

Variable agreement exists between different lipoprotein (a) [Lp(a)] measurement methods, but their clinical relevance remains unclear. The predictive value of Lp(a) measured by two different assays [Randox and University of California, San Diego (UCSD)] was determined in 623 coronary artery disease (CAD) cases and 948 controls in a case-control study within the EPIC-Norfolk Prospective Population Study. Participants were divided into sex-specific quintiles, and by Lp(a) 80th percentile cutoff values, however, were 36 mg/dl and 24 mg/dl for the Randox and UCSD assays, respectively. Despite this, Lp(a) levels were significantly associated with CAD risk, with odds ratios of 2.18 (1.58-3.01) and 2.35 (1.70-3.26) for people in the top versus bottom Lp(a) quintile for the Randox and UCSD assays, respectively. This study demonstrates that CAD risk is present at lower Lp(a) levels than the currently suggested optimal Lp(a) level of

Background and aims In clinical trials, protein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) inhibitors robustly lowered LDL-cholesterol (LDL-c) and had a favorable tolerability and safety profile. Based on these findings, PCSK9 inhibitors are incorporated in updates of clinical treatment guidelines. However, trial results do not necessarily predict the effectiveness under real-world conditions. The aim of the current study is to determine the efficacy and tolerability of PCSK9 inhibitors in routine outpatient care. Methods The cohort comprised all patients who were prescribed evolocumab or alirocumab at the outpatient clinic of a large university hospital in the Netherlands. Eligible patients required additional lipid-lowering despite maximally tolerated statin therapy and ezetimibe, or were statin intolerant. Data were systematically collected during routine outpatient visits. Results The study included 238 patients of whom 67.2% had familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) and 42.9% were statin intolerant. The mean LDL-c reduction was 55.0% from a baseline of 4.4 mmol/L. LDL-c goals were attained by 62.3% of patients. Side effects were reported by 15.5% of patients and 2.5% discontinued treatment. No meaningful differences in efficacy or tolerability were observed between patients with FH or statin intolerance, or across treatment regimens. Conclusions The observed lipid reductions and side effects profile of PCSK9 inhibitors in a routine care setting were comparable to observations in clinical trials.

Inclisiran is a novel drug that inhibits PCSK9 synthesis specifically in the liver, harnessing the natural mechanism of RNAi. Phase I and II data show that inclisiran lowers low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels on average by >50% with a duration of effect that enables twice-yearly dosing. Phases I, II and emerging Phase III data support inclisiran's safety, tolerability and risk–benefit profile. The ongoing ORION program includes Phase III trials that will provide robust evidence of inclisiran's safety and efficacy in individuals at high risk of atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD), including established ASCVD and familial hypercholesterolemia. In addition, the ORION-4 trial will assess the impact of inclisiran on cardiovascular outcomes in approximately 15,000 ASCVD subjects.

Objectives To study whether high-dose versus usual-dose statin treatment reduces the incidence of peripheral artery disease (PAD) and what is the effect of high-dose statin treatment on cardiovascular disease (CVD) outcome in patients with PAD. Methods and results In the Incremental Decrease in End Points Through Aggressive Lipid Lowering trial, 8888 post-myocardial infarction patients were randomised to high-dose or usual-dose statin therapy (atorvastatin 80 mg/day vs simvastatin 20–40 mg/day). We investigated the effect of high-dose versus usual-dose statins on the pre-specified outcome PAD incidence, and additionally performed a posthoc analysis of the efficacy of high-dose statins in reducing CVD risk among patients with PAD. During a median follow-up of 4.8 years, 94 patients (2.2%) receiving atorvastatin and 135 patients (3.2%) receiving simvastatin developed PAD (HR=0.70, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.91; p=0.007). The risk of major coronary events was almost twofold higher in patients with PAD at baseline, but was no longer significant after adjusting for the adverse cardiovascular risk profile. In PAD patients, major coronary events occurred in fewer patients in the atorvastatin group (14.4%) than in the simvastatin group (20.1%), but the difference did not reach statistical significance. (HR=0.68, 95% CI 0.41 to 1.11; p=0.13). Atorvastatin treatment significantly reduced overall cardiovascular (p=0.046) and coronary events (p=0.004), and coronary revascularisation (p=0.007) in these patients. Conclusions High-dose statin therapy with atorvastatin significantly reduced the incidence of PAD compared with usual-dose statin therapy with simvastatin. Patients with a history of PAD at baseline were at higher risk of future coronary events and this risk was reduced by high-dose atorvastatin treatment. Trial registration number NCT00159835 (URL: http://clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT00159835).

WHAT THIS PAPER ADDS Arterial stiffness in diabetics may render the ankle-brachial index (ABI) unreliable, even below the guideline recommended threshold for a falsely elevated ABI of > 1.4. Consequently, the use of the toe-brachial index (TBI) is advocated in the initial vascular examination of diabetics. However, there is no evidence that the TBI yields additional information compared with the ABI in diabetic patients if the ABI is not obviously elevated. Objective/Background: Arterial calcification may render the ankle-brachial index (ABI) unreliable in diabetic patients. Although guidelines recommend the toe-brachial index (TBI) for patients with falsely elevated ABI arbitrarily defined as an ABI > 1.4, arterial calcification is also common among diabetic patients with an ABI � 1.4. This could result in a “falsely normalized” ABI and under-diagnosis of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). We investigated whether diabetes invalidates the ABI as opposed to the TBI, and if the TBI may therefore be more suitable for detecting PAD in diabetic patients. Methods: The difference between ABI and TBI was compared between diabetic and non-diabetic patients with an ABI � 1.4 referred to the vascular laboratory. A BlandeAltman plot was constructed to assess whether ABIe TBI differences were dependent on the magnitude of the measurements. Subgroup analyses were performed for patients with a normal ABI, and for patients with critical ischemia. Results: The population comprised 161 diabetic (252 limbs) and 160 non-diabetic (253 limbs) patients (mean age 67). Median ABIs (0.79 vs. 0.80) were similar, while median TBI was 0.07 higher in diabetics (p ¼ 0.024).The ABIe TBI difference in diabetics and non-diabetics was similar (0.32 vs. 0.35; p ¼ .084), and was also similar for patients with a normal ABI. Moreover, ABIeTBI differences in diabetic- and non-diabetic patients overlapped, irrespective of the magnitude of the measurements. Diabetes was not associated with larger differences between ankle and toe pressures (mean difference � 0.9 mmHg, 95% confidence interval � 15 to 13 mmHg) among patients with critical ischemia. Conclusion: No evidence was found that the TBI may overcome the potentially invalidated ABI in diabetic patients with an ABI � 1.4. ABI and TBI are strongly associated, and this relationship is not influenced by diabetes. Therefore, the TBI does not allow for earlier detection of ischemia in diabetes.

Aims/hypothesis Contemporary data on diabetic foot ulcer prevalence are scarce. Most studies were conducted in the 1990s, reporting incidence rates of 1.9–2.6%. Since then the prevalence of diabetes has doubled and the organisation of diabetes care has undergone major changes. Up-to-date data that quantify the occurrence of diabetic foot ulcers are required and could serve as baseline measures for future studies. Methods Individuals with diabetes (n = 81,793) were identified from the NIVEL (Netherlands institute for health services research) Primary Care Database, which contains data for standardised routine care and is representative of the Dutch population. The annual incidence rates of ulcers and other foot abnormalities were calculated using data collected between 2010 and 2013. To account for inaccuracies, incidence rates were calculated using: (1) only individuals with a documented foot examination; (2) all individuals; and (3) individuals with explicit documentation of present/absent foot ulceration. Results There were 412 individuals with documented ulceration during the registration period (0.50%). The annual incidence rate of foot ulcers was 0.34% (range 0.22–1.08%). Of those individuals with a documented foot examination, 14.6% had absent pedal pulsations, 17.3% had neuropathy and 10.1% had callus/pressure marks. Conclusions/interpretation The annual incidence rate of foot ulcers in the current study was lower than previously reported. This observation could reflect the efficacy of screening practices and an increased awareness among professionals and patients. Nevertheless, approximately one in every five diabetic individuals had at least one identifiable risk factor on foot examination. This signifies the importance of preventive screening.

Background The value of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of diabetic ulcers is still under debate. Available evidence suggests that HBOT may improve the healing of diabetic ulcers, but it comes from small trials with heterogeneous populations and interventions. The DAMOCLES-trial will assess the (cost-)effectiveness of HBOT for ischemic diabetic ulcers in addition to standard of care. Methods In a multicenter randomized clinical trial, including 30 hospitals and all 10 HBOT centers in the Netherlands, we plan to enroll 275 patients with Types 1 or 2 diabetes, a Wagner 2, 3 or 4 ulcer of the leg present for at least 4 weeks, and concomitant leg ischemia, defined as an ankle systolic blood pressure of

PURPOSE OF REVIEW To review the published data related to the rise and fall of three different therapeutic approaches, which were investigated to lower cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. RECENT FINDINGS CVD remains a major burden of morbidity and mortality, despite therapeutic interventions. Novel strategies to address this residual risk are eagerly awaited, and a number of novel targets for therapy have been identified. Lipids and lipoproteins have been shown to play an eminent role in atherosclerosis progression, and as such, interventions that influence these biomarkers are crucial in CVD risk prevention. In recent years, however, clinical studies investigating the effect of novel lipid-modifying drugs on cardiovascular risk prevention have not always resulted in the anticipated beneficial outcome. Moreover, the development of therapies directed toward bioactive proteins acting at the crossroads of lipids and inflammation has also been disappointing. SUMMARY In this review, we will specifically address the rationale, design, and results of the clinical trials investigating the effects of three of the failing therapies: the thyroxin receptor agonist, the secretory phospholipase A2 antagonist, and the acyl coenzyme A:cholesterol acyltransferase inhibitor.

Background Patients with peripheral artery disease (PAD) are at increased risk of secondary events, which is exaggerated in the presence of type 2 diabetes mellitus. Diabetes is associated with a systemic pro-inflammatory state. We therefore investigated the cumulative impact of PAD and type 2 diabetes on carotid arterial wall inflammation. As recent data suggest a detrimental role of exogenous insulin on cardiovascular disease, we also included a group of insulin users. Results 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography with computed tomography (18F-FDG PET/CT) imaging showed increased carotid arterial wall inflammation, assessed as target-to-background ratio (TBR), in PAD patients without diabetes (PAD-only: n = 11, 1.97 ± 0.57) compared with matched controls (n = 12, 1.49 ± 0.57; p = 0.009), with a significant further TBR increase in PAD patients with type 2 diabetes (PAD-DM, n = 23, 2.90 ± 1, p = 0.033 vs PAD-only). TBR of insulin users (n = 12, 3.31 ± 1.14) was higher compared with patients on oral medication only (n = 11, 2.44 ± 0.76, p = 0.035), despite comparable PAD severity (Fontaine stages), BMI and CRP. Multivariate regression analysis showed that Hba1c and plasma insulin levels, but not dose of exogenous insulin, correlated with TBR. Conclusions Concurrent diabetes significantly augments carotid arterial wall inflammation in PAD patients. A further increase in those requiring insulin was observed, which was associated with diabetes severity, rather than with the use of exogenous insulin itself. Electronic supplementary material The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12872-016-0397-x) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

International guidelines recommend revascularisation as the preferred treatment for patients with critical limb ischaemia (CLI). Most contemporary research focuses on the outcome of invasive procedures for CLI, but little is known about the outcome of conservative management. Amputation free survival (AFS) and overall survival (OS) was investigated in patients with CLI who did or did not receive revascularisation, and characteristics associated with clinical outcomes were explored. This was a retrospective cohort study of consecutive patients with chronic CLI between 2010 and 2014 in a Dutch university hospital. CLI was defined as the presence of ischaemic rest pain or tissue loss in conjunction with an absolute systolic ankle pressure < 50 mmHg or a toe pressure < 30 mmHg. Patients were divided into invasive (revascularisation within 6 weeks), deferred invasive (revascularisation after 6 weeks), or permanently conservative treatment groups. Univariable and multivariable survival analyses were used to identify factors associated with AFS and OS. The majority (66.7%; N = 96) of the identified 144 patients with CLI (mean age 71.2 years; median follow-up 99 weeks) underwent revascularisation within 6 weeks of diagnosis. Deferred invasive treatment was provided in 18.1% (N = 26) patients and 22 patients (15.3%) were treated permanently conservatively. AFS and OS did not differ significantly between the three groups (Breslow-Wilcoxon p = .16 for AFS and p = .09 for OS). Age, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), and heart disease were significant independent predictors of AFS. Age, COPD, and hypertension were significant independent predictors of OS. Treatment was not a significant predictor of either AFS or OS. Not all patients with CLI require revascularisation to achieve an AFS that is similar to patients undergoing revascularisation, although the efficacy of conservative versus invasive treatment in CLI patients is still unclear. Further prospective studies should determine subgroups of patients in whom revascularisation may be omitted

The nocebo effect might be involved in a substantial proportion of patients experiencing muscle symptoms attributed to statin therapy. This observation underlines the importance of patient counselling and physician opposition to misinformation. Nonetheless, clinicians face a reality in which many patients do not tolerate adequate statin therapy despite rigorous efforts. Novel treatment strategies are, therefore, much needed.

Hyperbaric oxygen treatment (HBOT) is used to treat acute and chronic wounds. This systematic review was conducted to summarise and evaluate existing evidence on the costs associated with HBOT in the treatment of wounds.We searched multiple electronic databases in March 2015 for cohort studies and randomised clinical trials (RCTs) that reported on the clinical effectiveness and treatment costs of HBOT in the treatment of acute or chronic wounds.One RCT and three cohort studies reported on economic as well as clinical outcomes. These studies comprised different disorders (ischaemic diabetic foot ulcers, thermal burns, Fournier's gangrene and necrotising soft tissue infections) and employed different clinical and economic outcome measures. Only the RCT had a good methodological quality. Three of the included studies reported that their primary clinical outcomes (wound healing, hospital stay, complications) improved in the HBOT group. The effects of HBOT on costs were variable.Currently, there is little direct evidence on the cost-effectiveness of HBOT in the treatment of acute and chronic wounds. Although there is some evidence suggesting effectiveness of HBOT, further studies should include economic outcomes in order to make recommendations on the cost-effectiveness of applying HBOT in wound care.

Aims Particular atherosclerotic risk factors may differ in their association with atherosclerosis across vascular territories. Few studies have compared the associations between multiple risk factors and cardiovascular disease (CVD) manifestations in one population. We studied the strength of the associations between traditional risk factors including coronary artery disease (CAD), ischaemic and haemorrhagic stroke, abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs), and peripheral arterial disease (PAD). Methods and results This analysis included 21 798 participants of the EPIC-Norfolk population study, without previous CVD. Events were defined as hospitalization or mortality, coded using ICD-10. The associations between the risk factors, such as low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, systolic blood pressure (SBP), and smoking, and the various CVD manifestations were compared using competing risk analyses. During 12.1 years, 3087 CVD events were recorded. The associations significantly differed across CVD manifestations. Low-density lipoprotein cholesterol was strongly associated with CAD [adjusted hazard rate (aHR) highest vs. lowest quartile 1.63, 95% CI 1.44–1.86]. Systolic blood pressure was a strong risk factor for PAD (aHR highest vs. lowest quartile 2.95, 95% CI 1.78–4.89) and ischaemic stroke (aHR highest vs. lowest quartile 2.48, 95% CI 1.55–3.97), but not for AAA. Smoking was strongly associated with incident AAA (aHR current vs. never 7.66, 95% CI 4.50–13.04) and PAD (aHR current vs. never 4.66, 95% CI 3.29–6.61), but not with haemorrhagic stroke. Conclusion The heterogeneity in the risk factor–CVD associations supports the concept of pathophysiological differences between atherosclerotic CVD manifestations and could have implications for CVD prevention.

Barely a decade after the discovery of the gene encoding proprotein convertase subtilisin/kexin type 9 (PCSK9) and its recognition as a key player in cholesterol metabolism, PCSK9 inhibition is now considered an exciting approach in the reduction of residual risk of cardiovascular disease. The progress from PCSK9 discovery to the development of targeted treatment has been unprecedented in terms of scale and speed. The first suggestion of a link between PCSK9 and hypercholesterolemia was published in 2003; a decade later, two meta-analyses of clinical trials comparing anti-PCSK9 treatment to placebo or ezetimibe, including >10,000 hypercholesterolemic individuals, were published. Currently, three PCSK9 inhibitors are being evaluated in clinical outcome trials and the results will determine the future of these lipid-lowering therapies by establishing their clinical efficacy in terms of cardiovascular event reduction, safety, and the consequences of prolonged exposure to very low levels of LDL-cholesterol. Irrespective of their outcomes, the exceptionally rapid development of these drugs exemplifies how novel technologies, genetic validation, and rapid clinical progression provide the tools to expedite the development of new drugs.

Aims Intensive glucose control, often involving insulin treatment, failed to improve cardiovascular outcomes in several clinical trials. Observational studies reported an association between insulin use and cardiovascular disease (CVD) risk. It has therefore been suggested that insulin adversely affects CVD risk. To investigate the feasibility of this hypothesis, we studied the association between insulin dose and CVD risk in type 2 diabetes. Methods A case-control study was conducted of new users of oral antidiabetics who were prescribed insulin, using the Dutch Pharmo database. Cases were hospitalized for a cardiovascular event (CVE) and matched 1:2 to patients who were not hospitalized for a CVE, by sex, age, duration of diabetes and type of oral antidiabetic. Patients were divided into tertiles according to mean daily insulin dose. Conditional logistic regression analyses were used to explore the association between insulin exposure and CVE risk. Results We included 836 patients (517 (62%) male, mean age 66 years). After adjusting for available potential confounders, including HbA1c and triglycerides, insulin exposure was positively related to CVE risk (odds ratios for high (≥53.0 U/day) and intermediate (24.3–52.9 U/day) vs. low exposure (≤24.2 U/day): 3.00 [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.70 to 5.28] and 2.03 [95% CI 1.17 to 3.52]. Conclusion Our findings are in line with the suggestion that high-dose insulin therapy adversely affects CVD risk, but need to be interpreted with caution due to the observational nature of the study. The role of particularly high-dose insulin in the progression of CVD warrants further investigation.

Reducing plasma levels of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-c) remains the cornerstone in the primary and secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease. However, a substantial proportion of patients fail to achieve acceptable LDL-c levels with currently available lipid-lowering drugs. Over the last decade, inhibition of Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin type 9 (PCSK9) has emerged as a promising target to reduce residual cardiovascular disease risk. Binding of PCSK9 to the LDL receptor targets the LDL receptor for lysosomal degradation. Inhibition of PCSK9 increases expression of the LDL receptor. This observation has led to the development of a number of approaches to directly target PCSK9. Three monoclonal antibodies against PCSK9 are currently being evaluated in phase 3 trials involving various patient categories on different background lipid lowering therapies. Current evidence shows reductions in LDL cholesterol levels of up to 70%, independent of background statin therapy. The results of phase 3 trials will demonstrate the long-term efficacy and safety of PCSK9 inhibition, and will indicate whether LDL-c lowering induced by this novel approach translates into beneficial effects on CVD outcome.

Wound care is a classic example of a surgical realm with a great variation in care. The diversity in wounds and wound treatments, the limited amount of convincing evidence, and the diverging opinions among doctors and nurses involved in wound care contribute to this undesirable variation in care. For chronic wounds, such as arterial or venous ulcers, pressure sores, and diabetic foot ulcers, but also for acute wounds after surgery or trauma, international and national guidelines provide recommendations on diagnostic procedures and treatment options, but rely mostly on expert opinion. We present the available evidence from Cochrane systematic reviews for the systemic treatment (i.e., not prevention) of patients with wounds, as opposed to topical wound treatments. This evidence shows: - Venous ulcers: High-compression therapy is the classic and evidence-based treatment for treating venous ulcers. Oral pentoxifylline promotes ulcer healing with and without compression therapy. Oral zinc is not effective to heal venous ulcers. - Acute wounds: Recombinant human growth hormone accelerates healing of large burn wounds and donor sites, while high-carbohydrate feeding might reduce the risk of pneumonia. Linezolid is more effective than vancomycin for treating skin and soft tissue infections. Hyperbaric oxygen may help heal crush wounds and skin grafts. Therapeutic touch does not heal acute wounds. - Pressure sores: Air-fluidized and some low-tech devices appear effective for treating existing pressure ulcers. Oral zinc, protein, or vitamin C supplements seem ineffective. Also, evidence is lacking on the effectiveness of repositioning regimes as a treatment option. - Diabetic ulcers: Hyperbaric oxygen therapy and pressure-relieving devices may improve healing rates. - Arterial ulcers: Prostanoids and spinal cord stimulation may be effective in healing ischemic ulcers. Thus, fortunately, some high-level evidence exists for various local and systemic interventions in wound care. Caregivers should be aware of, and apply, the strongest evidence available. Only when all stakeholders (patients, physicians, wound care nurses, but also manufacturers and buyers) implement this available evidence will optimum quality of care for patients with wounds be ensured.

The value of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in the treatment of diabetic ulcers is still under debate. Available evidence suggests that HBOT may improve the healing of diabetic ulcers, but it comes from small trials with heterogeneous populations and interventions. The DAMOCLES-trial will assess the (cost-)effectiveness of HBOT for ischemic diabetic ulcers in addition to standard of care.In a multicenter randomized clinical trial, including 30 hospitals and all 10 HBOT centers in the Netherlands, we plan to enroll 275 patients with Types 1 or 2 diabetes, a Wagner 2, 3 or 4 ulcer of the leg present for at least 4 weeks, and concomitant leg ischemia, defined as an ankle systolic blood pressure of70 mmHg, a toe systolic blood pressure of50 mmHg or a forefoot transcutaneous oxygen tension (TcpO2) of40 mmHg. Eligible patients may be candidates for revascularization. Patients will be randomly assigned to standard care with or without 40 HBOT-sessions.Primary outcome measures are freedom from major amputation after 12 months and achievement of, and time to, complete wound healing. Secondary endpoints include freedom from minor amputations, ulcer recurrence, TcpO2 , quality of life, and safety. In addition, we will assess the cost-effectiveness of HBOT for this indication.The DAMOCLES trial will be the largest trial ever performed in the realm of HBOT for chronic ulcers, and it is unique for addressing patients with ischemic diabetic foot ulcers who may also receive vascular reconstructions. This matches the treatment dilemma in current clinical practice.

Objective A systematic review of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) to assess the additional value of hyperbaric oxygen therapy (HBOT) in promoting the healing of diabetic foot ulcers and preventing amputations was performed. Methods MEDLINE, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched to identify RCTs in patients with diabetic foot ulcers published up to August 2013. Eligible studies reported the effectiveness of adjunctive HBOT with regard to wound healing, amputations, and additional interventions. Results Seven of the 669 identified articles met the inclusion criteria, comprising 376 patients. Three trials included 182 patients with ischaemic ulcers, two trials studied 64 patients with non-ischaemic ulcers, and two trials comprising 130 patients did not specify ulcer type. Two trials were of good methodological quality. Pooling of data was deemed inappropriate because of heterogeneity. Two RCTs in patients with ischaemic ulcers found increased rates of complete healing at 1-year follow-up (number needed to treat (NNT) 1.8 (95% CI: 1.1 to 4.6) and 4.1 (95% CI: 2.3 to 19)), but found no difference in amputation rates. A third trial in ischaemic ulcers found significantly lower major amputation rates in patients with HBOT (NNT 4.2, 95% CI: 2.4 to 17), but did not report on wound healing. None of the RCTs in non-ischaemic ulcers reported differences in wound healing or amputation rates. Two trials with unknown ulcer types reported beneficial effects on amputation rates, although the largest trial used a different definition for both outcomes. HBOT did not influence the need for additional interventions. Conclusion Current evidence shows some evidence of the effectiveness of HBOT in improving the healing of diabetic leg ulcers in patients with concomitant ischaemia. Larger trials of higher quality are needed before implementation of HBOT in routine clinical practice in patients with diabetic foot ulcers can be justified.