Search

PURPOSE To examine the prevalence and dynamics of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) and its association with metastatic recurrence in patients with high-risk early-stage hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) more than 5 years from diagnosis. METHODS We enrolled 103 patients with high-risk stage II-III HR+ BC diagnosed more than 5 years prior without clinical evidence of recurrence. We performed whole-exome sequencing (WES) on primary tumor tissue to identify somatic mutations tracked via a personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA test to detect minimal residual disease (MRD). We collected plasma at the time of consent and at routine visits every 6-12 months. Patients were followed for clinical recurrence. RESULTS In total, 85 of 103 patients had sufficient tumor tissue; of them, 83 of 85 (97.6%) patients had successful whole-exome sequencing. Personalized ctDNA assays were designed targeting a median of 36 variants to test 219 plasma samples. The median time from diagnosis to first sample was 8.4 years. The median follow-up was 10.4 years from diagnosis and 2.0 years from first sample. The median number of plasma samples per patient was two. Eight patients (10%) had positive MRD testing at any time point. Six patients (7.2%) developed distant metastatic recurrence, all of whom were MRD-positive before overt clinical recurrence, with median ctDNA lead time of 12.4 months. MRD was not identified in one patient (1.2%) with local recurrence. Two of eight MRD-positive patients had not had clinical recurrence at last follow-up. CONCLUSION In this prospective study, in patients with high-risk HR+ BC in the late adjuvant setting, ctDNA was identified a median of 1 year before all cases of distant metastasis. Future studies will determine if ctDNA-guided intervention in patients with HR+ BC can alter clinical outcomes.

Supplementary Figure S1. Vistusertib (AZD2014) causes a decrease in RB phosphorylation in the absence of cell cycle arrest. Supplementary Figure S2. Different mTOR inhibitors in combination with palbociclib cause a decrease in cell viability. Supplementary Figure S3. The effects of vistusertib and palbociclib in the CTC-174 model in vivo. Supplementary Figure S4. Analysis of cell cycle and cell morphology. Supplementary Figure S5. The effects of vistusertib (AZD2014) and palbociclib on P21 expression levels. Supplementary Figure S6. Analysis of apoptosis in vitro and in vivo. Supplementary Figure S7. Robust inhibition of mTOR signalling by short-term treatment with RAD001 or vistusertib (AZD2014) does not affect ER binding. Supplementary Table S1. Selected genes and primer IDs. Supplementary Table S2. Supplementary Table S3. Palbociclib resistant cell lines are sensitive to vistusertib (AZD2014).

Tumor cell line panel composition and growth inhibition sensitivity (GI50) to AZD8835.

Details on PK / PD / efficacy modeling in BT474 xenograft model

The cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)–retinoblastoma (RB)–E2F pathway plays a critical role in the control of cell cycle in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors of CDK4/6 have shown promise in this tumor type in combination with hormonal therapies, reflecting the particular dependence of this subtype of cancer on cyclin D1 and E2F transcription factors. mTOR inhibitors have also shown potential in clinical trials in this disease setting. Recent data have suggested cooperation between the PI3K/mTOR pathway and CDK4/6 inhibition in preventing early adaptation and eliciting growth arrest, but the mechanisms of the interplay between these pathways have not been fully elucidated. Here we show that profound and durable inhibition of ER+ breast cancer growth is likely to require multiple hits on E2F-mediated transcription. We demonstrate that inhibition of mTORC1/2 does not affect ER function directly, but does cause a decrease in cyclin D1 protein, RB phosphorylation, and E2F-mediated transcription. Combination of an mTORC1/2 inhibitor with a CDK4/6 inhibitor results in more profound effects on E2F-dependent transcription, which translates into more durable growth arrest and a delay in the onset of resistance. Combined inhibition of mTORC1/2, CDK4/6, and ER delivers even more profound and durable regressions in breast cancer cell lines and xenografts. Furthermore, we show that CDK4/6 inhibitor–resistant cell lines reactivate the CDK–RB–E2F pathway, but remain sensitive to mTORC1/2 inhibition, suggesting that mTORC1/2 inhibitors may represent an option for patients that have relapsed on CDK4/6 therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 908–20. ©2018 AACR.

Pharmacokinetics modelling of AZD2014 intermittent dosing schedule.

HCC1428-eveR and HCC1428-LTED-eveR cell lines resistant to everolimus remain sensitive to dual mTORC1/2 inhibitor AZD2014.

Supplementary data on cell lines

Pharmacokinetics and PK/PD relationships for AZD2014

The PIK3CA gene, encoding the p110α catalytic unit of PI3Kα, is one of the most frequently mutated oncogenes in human cancer. Hence, PI3Kα is a target subject to intensive efforts in identifying inhibitors and evaluating their therapeutic potential. Here, we report studies with a novel PI3K inhibitor, AZD8835, currently in phase I clinical evaluation. AZD8835 is a potent inhibitor of PI3Kα and PI3Kδ with selectivity versus PI3Kβ, PI3Kγ, and other kinases that preferentially inhibited growth in cells with mutant PIK3CA status, such as in estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) breast cancer cell lines BT474, MCF7, and T47D (sub-μmol/L GI50s). Consistent with this, AZD8835 demonstrated antitumor efficacy in corresponding breast cancer xenograft models when dosed continuously. In addition, an alternative approach of intermittent high-dose scheduling (IHDS) was explored given our observations that higher exposures achieved greater pathway inhibition and induced apoptosis. Indeed, using IHDS, monotherapy AZD8835 was able to induce tumor xenograft regression. Furthermore, AZD8835 IHDS in combination with other targeted therapeutic agents further enhanced antitumor activity (up to 92% regression). Combination partners were prioritized on the basis of our mechanistic insights demonstrating signaling pathway cross-talk, with a focus on targeting interdependent ER and/or CDK4/6 pathways or alternatively a node (mTOR) in the PI3K-pathway, approaches with demonstrated clinical benefit in ER+ breast cancer patients. In summary, AZD8835 IHDS delivers strong antitumor efficacy in a range of combination settings and provides a promising alternative to continuous dosing to optimize the therapeutic index in patients. Such schedules merit clinical evaluation. Mol Cancer Ther; 15(5); 877–89. ©2016 AACR.

Supplementary table 1: Biochemical and cellular activity of AZD2014. Supplementary table 2: Biochemical activity of AZD2014. Supplementary table 3: Anti proliferative activity of AZD2014 in a panel of ER+, endocrine resistant and LTED cell lines. Supplementary table 4: Activity of AZD2014 in a number of ER+ breast cancer in vivo models.

PDF file - 35K, Characteristics of the 2 metastatic CRC datasets used for evaluation of prediction of PFS.

PDF file - 32K, PFS analysis within the French cohort.

Supplementary Figure 1. Participant Flow Diagram

PDF file - 33K, Univariate analysis.

Supplemtary figures 1-9

(1) Figure S1. Sustained AKT and MAPK pathway signaling following EGFR TKI treatment in EGFR-mutant lung cancer cells. (2) Figure S2. Analysis of cells treated with TKIs after 96 hours. (3) Figure S3. HER3 reactivation after osimertinib treatment. (4) Figure S4. Combination osimertinib plus SFK inhibitor decreases SFK signaling and results in better cell growth inhibition. (5) Figure S5. Upregulation of SFKs and FAK upon EGFR inhibition in EGFR-mutant lung cancer cells. (6) Figure S6. Osimertinib compared to osimertinib plus dasatinib in an osimertinib-sensitive xenograft model. (7) Figure S7. Extracellular interactions may influence osimertinib potency. (8) Figure S8. SFK/FAK pathway inhibition most potently enhances the effects of osimertinib. (9) Figure S9. Analysis of osimertinib (AZD9291) resistant lung cancer cell lines.

Purpose:The activating mutation AKT1E17K occurs in approximately 7% of estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report, from a multipart, first-in-human, phase I study (NCT01226316), tolerability and activity of capivasertib, an oral AKT inhibitor, as monotherapy or combined with fulvestrant in expansion cohorts of patients with AKT1E17K-mutant ER+ MBC.Patients and Methods:Patients with an AKT1E17K mutation, detected by local (next-generation sequencing) or central (plasma-based BEAMing) testing, received capivasertib 480 mg twice daily, 4 days on, 3 days off, weekly or 400 mg twice daily combined with fulvestrant at the labeled dose. Study endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24). Biomarker analyses were conducted in the combination cohort.Results:From October 2013 to August 2018, 63 heavily pretreated patients received capivasertib (20 monotherapy, 43 combination). ORR was 20% with monotherapy, and within the combination cohort was 36% in fulvestrant-pretreated and 20% in fulvestrant-naïve patients, although the latter group may have had more aggressive disease at baseline. AKT1E17K mutations were detectable in plasma by BEAMing (95%, 41/43), droplet digital PCR (80%, 33/41), and next-generation sequencing (76%, 31/41). A ≥50% decrease in AKT1E17K at cycle 2 day 1 was associated with improved PFS. Combination therapy appeared more tolerable than monotherapy [most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events: rash (9% vs. 20%), hyperglycemia (5% vs. 30%), diarrhea (5% vs. 10%)].Conclusions:Capivasertib demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in heavily pretreated patients with AKT1E17K-mutant ER+ MBC, including those with prior disease progression on fulvestrant. Tolerability and activity appeared improved by the combination.

Supplementary Table results

Supplementary Table Methods

Supplementary Figure 3. AKT1E17K Allele Frequency (AF) Distribution and Median AF for patients with available ctDNA NGS data

Supplementary tables

PDF file - 219K, Supplemental Figure 1. A We evaluated 4 "RAS" signatures across 4 CRC data sets to assess their ability to discriminate KRAS mutant samples from KRAS wild-type. Supplemental Figure 2. The lower observed RIS of KRAS codon 13 mutated samples relative to KRAS codon 12 mutated samples may be a result of the imbalanced distribution of these mutations in the training data. Supplemental Figure 3. RIS distribution by mutation of KRAS, BRAF, NRAS mutations, and wild-type. Supplemental Figure 4. RAS index score (RIS) for PIK3CA mutant samples by exon in the TCGA CRC cohort. Supplemental Figure 5. Distribution of RIS for the subset of colorectal samples (n=19) within the Cancer Cell Line Encylopedia (CCLE), separated by KRAS codon, BRAF V600E, PIK3CA (KRAS/BRAF wild-type), or wild-type (no KRAS/BRAF/PIK3CA) mutation. Supplemental Figure 6. In the mouse early passage cohort (n=26), our RAS model outperforms the KRAS/BRAF mutation model (p=0.06 vs p > .1, respectively). Supplemental Figure 7. Association of RIS and cetuximab response for metastatic colorectal patients (Khambata-Ford, et al.) Patients annotated according to treatment response: Progressive Disease (PD), Stable Disease (SD) and Partial Response (PR) as well as KRAS mutation status.

Purpose: PTEN-null tumors become dependent on the PI3Kβ isoform and can be targeted by molecules such as the selective PI3Kβ inhibitor AZD8186. However, beyond the modulation of the canonical PI3K pathway, the consequences of inhibiting PI3Kβ are poorly defined.Experimental Design: To determine the broader impact of AZD8186 in PTEN-null tumors, we performed a genome-wide RNA-seq analysis of PTEN-null triple-negative breast tumor xenografts treated with AZD8186. Mechanistic consequences of AZD8186 treatment were examined across a number of PTEN-null cell lines and tumor models.Results: AZD8186 treatment resulted in modification of transcript and protein biomarkers associated with cell metabolism. We observed downregulation of cholesterol biosynthesis genes and upregulation of markers associated with metabolic stress. Downregulation of cholesterol biosynthesis proteins, such as HMGCS1, occurred in PTEN-null cell lines and tumor xenografts sensitive to AZD8186. Therapeutic inhibition of PI3Kβ also upregulated PDHK4 and increased PDH phosphorylation, indicative of reduced carbon flux into the TCA cycle. Consistent with this, metabolomic analysis revealed a number of changes in key carbon pathways, nucleotide, and amino acid biosynthesis.Conclusions: This study identifies novel mechanistic biomarkers of PI3Kβ inhibition in PTEN-null tumors supporting the concept that targeting PI3Kβ may exploit a metabolic dependency that contributes to therapeutic benefit in inducing cell stress. Considering these additional pathways will guide biomarker and combination strategies for this class of agents. Clin Cancer Res; 23(24); 7584–95. ©2017 AACR.

Purpose: KRAS wild-type status is an imperfect predictor of sensitivity to anti-EGF receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibodies in colorectal cancer, motivating efforts to identify novel molecular aberrations driving RAS. This study aimed to build a quantitative readout of RAS pathway activity to (i) uncover molecular surrogates of RAS activity specific to colorectal cancer, (ii) improve the prediction of cetuximab response in patients, and (iii) suggest new treatment strategies.Experimental Design: A model of RAS pathway activity was trained in a large colorectal cancer dataset and validated in three independent colorectal cancer patient datasets. Novel molecular traits were inferred from The Cancer Genome Atlas colorectal cancer data. The ability of the RAS model to predict resistance to cetuximab was tested in mouse xenografts and three independent patient cohorts. Drug sensitivity correlations between our model and large cell line compendiums were performed.Results: The performance of the RAS model was remarkably robust across three validation datasets. (i) Our model confirmed the heterogeneity of the RAS phenotype in KRAS wild-type patients, and suggests novel molecular traits driving its phenotype (e.g., MED12 loss, FBXW7 mutation, MAP2K4 mutation). (ii) It improved the prediction of response and progression-free survival (HR, 2.0; P < 0.01) to cetuximab compared with KRAS mutation (xenograft and patient cohorts). (iii) Our model consistently predicted sensitivity to MAP–ERK kinase (MEK) inhibitors (P < 0.01) in two cell panel screens.Conclusions: Modeling the RAS phenotype in colorectal cancer allows for the robust interrogation of RAS pathway activity across cell lines, xenografts, and patient cohorts. It demonstrates clinical utility in predicting response to anti-EGFR agents and MEK inhibitors. Clin Cancer Res; 20(1); 265–72. ©2013 AACR.

PDF file - 35K, Data sets used for evaluation of the colorectal RAS model, and reported AUC in classification of KRAS mutant from wild-type samples.

Supplemental data figure legends

Background: SERENA-1 (NCT03616587) is a Phase 1, multi-part, open-label study of camizestrant in women with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer. Parts A/B and C/D (escalation/expansion) examined camizestrant as monotherapy and in combination with palbociclib respectively and have been presented previously.1,2 Here we present data from parts G/H which examined camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib. Methods: The primary objective was to determine the safety and tolerability of camizestrant 75 mg once daily (QD) in combination with abemaciclib 150 mg twice daily (BID). Secondary objectives included investigation of anti-tumor response and pharmacokinetics (PK). Participants were previously treated women of any menopausal status (pre-menopausal women received this combination alongside ongoing ovarian function suppressors). Prior treatment with ≤2 lines of chemotherapy in the advanced setting was permitted. There was no limit on the number of lines of prior endocrine treatment in the advanced setting; previous treatment with CDK4/6 inhibitors (CDK4/6i) and fulvestrant was permitted. Results: As of 1st June 2022, 24 patients had received camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib with a median 7.7 month follow up. Tolerability of the combination of camizestrant and abemaciclib was consistent with that of each drug individually. No patient required camizestrant dose reduction. All camizestrant-related heart rate decreases were Grade 1 (asymptomatic). PK data for camizestrant in combination with abemaciclib were consistent with camizestrant as monotherapy and published abemaciclib steady-state PK data, indicating no clinically relevant drug-drug interaction. In these heavily pre-treated patients (46% prior chemotherapy, 75% prior CDK4/6i, 54% prior fulvestrant; all in the advanced disease setting) and of whom 67% had visceral metastases, the objective response rate was 5/19 (26.3%), the clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks was 16/24 (66.7%) and the median progression-free survival had not been reached, with 8/24 patients experiencing a progression event. These data support the use of camizestrant 75 mg QD combined with the approved abemaciclib dose. Conclusions: Camizestrant 75 mg QD in combination with abemaciclib 150 mg BID was well tolerated with encouraging clinical activity. The inclusion of this regimen in the ongoing Phase 3, SERENA-6 trial 3, of camizestrant combined with CDK4/6i versus an aromatase inhibitor, will further clarify the role of this combination in the treatment of patients with ER+/HER2− advanced breast cancer with tumors expressing ESR1 mutations. References 1. Baird R, Oliveira M, Ciruelos Gil EM, et al. SABCS 2020 Virtual Meeting. Abstract PS11-05. 2. Oliveira M, Hamilton EP, Incorvati J, et al. J Clin Oncol 40, 2022 (suppl 16; abstr 1032). 3. SERENA-6 trial. Available at https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04964934 We acknowledge Helen Heffron, PhD, from InterComm International who provided medical writing support funded by AstraZeneca. Citation Format: Nicholas Turner, Christos Vaklavas, Emiliano Calvo, Javier Garcia-Corbacho, Jason Incorvati, Manuel Ruiz Borrego, Chris Twelves, Anne Armstrong, Begoña Bermejo, Erika Hamilton, Mafalda Oliveira, Eva Ciruelos, Peter Kabos, Manish R Patel, Maria Borrell, Howard Burris, Bruno de Paula, Alejandro Falcon, Cristina Hernando, Irene Moreno, Ciara S. O’Brien, Elena Shagisultanova, Ivan Victoria Ruiz, Judy S. Wang, Mei Wei, Tim Brier, Danielle Carroll, Carmela Ciardullo, Lisa Gibbons, itziar irurzun-Arana, Tony Jack, bistra kirova, Teresa Klinowska, Justin Lindemann, Julie Maidment, Alastair Mathewson, Rhiannon Maudsley, Robert McEwen, Christopher Morrow, Andy Sykes, Richard D. Baird. SERENA-1: Updated analyses from a Phase 1 study of the next generation oral selective estrogen receptor degrader camizestrant (AZD9833) combined with abemaciclib, in women with ER-positive, HER2-negative advanced breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2022 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2022 Dec 6-10; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2023;83(5 Suppl):Abstract nr P3-07-28.

The PI3K pathway is commonly activated in breast cancer, with PI3K-AKT pathway inhibitors used clinically. However, mechanisms that limit or enhance the therapeutic effects of PI3K-AKT inhibitors are poorly understood at a genome-wide level. Parallel CRISPR screens in 3 PTEN-null breast cancer cell lines identified genes mediating resistance to capivasertib (AKT inhibitor) and AZD8186 (PI3Kβ inhibitor). The dominant mechanism causing resistance is reactivated PI3K-AKT-mTOR signalling, but not other canonical signalling pathways. Deletion of TSC1/2 conferred resistance to PI3Kβi and AKTi through mTORC1. However, deletion of PIK3R2 and INPPL1 drove specific PI3Kβi resistance through AKT. Conversely deletion of PIK3CA, ERBB2, ERBB3 increased PI3Kβi sensitivity while modulation of RRAGC, LAMTOR1, LAMTOR4 increased AKTi sensitivity. Significantly, we found that Mcl-1 loss enhanced response through rapid apoptosis induction with AKTi and PI3Kβi in both sensitive and drug resistant TSC1/2 null cells. The combination effect was BAK but not BAX dependent. The Mcl-1i + PI3Kβ/AKTi combination was effective across a panel of breast cancer cell lines with PIK3CA and PTEN mutations, and delivered increased anti-tumor benefit in vivo. This study demonstrates that different resistance drivers to PI3Kβi and AKTi converge to reactivate PI3K-AKT or mTOR signalling and combined inhibition of Mcl-1 and PI3K-AKT has potential as a treatment strategy for PI3Kβi/AKTi sensitive and resistant breast tumours.

Five to ten percent of ER+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC) tumors harbor somatic PTEN mutations. Loss of function of this tumor-suppressor gene defines a highly aggressive, treatment-refractory disease for which new therapies are urgently needed. This Phase I multipart expansion study assessed oral capivasertib with fulvestrant in patients with PTEN-mutant ER+ MBC. Safety and tolerability were assessed by standard methods. Plasma and tumor were collected for NGS and immunohistochemistry analyses of PTEN protein expression. In 31 eligible patients (12 fulvestrant naive; 19 fulvestrant pretreated), the 24-week clinical benefit rate was 17% in fulvestrant-naive and 42% in fulvestrant-pretreated patients, with objective response rate of 8% and 21%, respectively. Non-functional PTEN was centrally confirmed in all cases by NGS or immunohistochemistry. Co­mutations occurred in PIK3CA (32%), with less ESR1 (10% vs 72%) and more TP53 (40% vs 28%) alterations in fulvestrant-naive versus fulvestrant-pretreated patients, respectively. PTEN was clonally dominant in most patients. Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events occurred in 32% of patients, most frequently diarrhea and maculopapular rash (both n = 2). In this clinical study, which selectively targeted the aggressive PTEN-mutant ER+ MBC, capivasertib plus fulvestrant was tolerable and clinically active. Phenotypic and genomic differences were apparent between fulvestrant-naive and -pretreated patients.Trial registration number for the study is NCT01226316.

Background: In the PAKT study, addition of the oral AKT inhibitor capivasertib to 1st-line paclitaxel therapy for metastatic TNBC resulted in significantly longer progression-free survival (PFS; primary endpoint; Schmid, J Clin Oncol 2020). The stratified PFS hazard ratio was 0.74 (95% CI, 0.50-1.08; one-sided P=0.06; predefined significance level of 0.10, one-sided; median PFS 5.9 vs 4.2 months with capivasertib vs placebo). Overall survival (OS) results were immature at the primary analysis with 53% of events but suggested long OS with capivasertib (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37-0.99; two-sided P=0.04). Here we report final results. Methods: This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomised phase II trial, recruited women with untreated, metastatic TNBC. Total of 140 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to paclitaxel 90mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15) with either capivasertib (400mg twice daily) or placebo (days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS. Secondary endpoints included OS in the ITT population and in patients with and without PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-alterations. Results: With a median F/U of 40.0 months, median OS was longer in the capivasertib arm (19.1 vs 13.5 months, stratified HR 0.70, 95% CI 0.47-1.05, p=0.085). In contrast to the earlier analysis, no meaningful differences were seen in terms of benefit with capivasertib between patients with or without alterations of PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN. Median OS numerically favoured capivasertib vs placebo both in the PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered (stratified HR 0.58, 95% CI 0.21-1.58, p=0.290) and PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN non-altered subgroup (stratified HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.47-1.18, p=0.207). The safety profile of capivasertib plus paclitaxel was unchanged. Conclusions: Final OS results show a numerical trend favouring capivasertib; effects were observed regardless of PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations. Consistent with the previously observed PFS benefit, these findings support further evaluation of first-line Capivasertib plus paclitaxel for metastatic TNBC in the ongoing Capitello290 randomised phase III trial in patients with and without PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations. Citation Format: Peter Schmid, Jacinta Abraham, Stephen Chan, Adrian Murray Brunt, Gia Nemsadze, Richard D Baird, Yeon Hee Park, Peter Hall, Timothy Perren, Robert C Stein, László Mangel, Jean-Marc Ferrero, Melissa Phillips, John Conibear, Javier Cortes, Andrew Foxley, Elza de Bruin, Robert McEwen, Myria Nikolaou, Daniel Stetson, Brian Dougherty, Aaron Prendergast, Max McLaughlin-Callan, Matthew Burgess, Cheryl Lawrence, Hayley Cartwright, Kelly Mousa, Nicholas Turner, Duncan Wheatley. Mature survival update of the double-blind placebo-controlled randomised phase II PAKT trial of first-line capivasertib plus paclitaxel for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2020 San Antonio Breast Cancer Virtual Symposium; 2020 Dec 8-11; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(4 Suppl):Abstract nr PD1-11.

Purpose:The activating mutation AKT1E17K occurs in approximately 7% of estrogen receptor–positive (ER+) metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report, from a multipart, first-in-human, phase I study (NCT01226316), tolerability and activity of capivasertib, an oral AKT inhibitor, as monotherapy or combined with fulvestrant in expansion cohorts of patients with AKT1E17K-mutant ER+ MBC.Patients and Methods:Patients with an AKT1E17K mutation, detected by local (next-generation sequencing) or central (plasma-based BEAMing) testing, received capivasertib 480 mg twice daily, 4 days on, 3 days off, weekly or 400 mg twice daily combined with fulvestrant at the labeled dose. Study endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS), and clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR24). Biomarker analyses were conducted in the combination cohort.Results:From October 2013 to August 2018, 63 heavily pretreated patients received capivasertib (20 monotherapy, 43 combination). ORR was 20% with monotherapy, and within the combination cohort was 36% in fulvestrant-pretreated and 20% in fulvestrant-naïve patients, although the latter group may have had more aggressive disease at baseline. AKT1E17K mutations were detectable in plasma by BEAMing (95%, 41/43), droplet digital PCR (80%, 33/41), and next-generation sequencing (76%, 31/41). A ≥50% decrease in AKT1E17K at cycle 2 day 1 was associated with improved PFS. Combination therapy appeared more tolerable than monotherapy [most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events: rash (9% vs. 20%), hyperglycemia (5% vs. 30%), diarrhea (5% vs. 10%)].Conclusions:Capivasertib demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in heavily pretreated patients with AKT1E17K-mutant ER+ MBC, including those with prior disease progression on fulvestrant. Tolerability and activity appeared improved by the combination.

Purpose:There are several agents in early clinical trials targeting components of the adenosine pathway including A2AR and CD73. The identification of cancers with a significant adenosine drive is critical to understand the potential for these molecules. However, it is challenging to measure tumor adenosine levels at scale, thus novel, clinically tractable biomarkers are needed.Experimental Design:We generated a gene expression signature for the adenosine signaling using regulatory networks derived from the literature and validated this in patients. We applied the signature to large cohorts of disease from The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and cohorts of immune checkpoint inhibitor–treated patients.Results:The signature captures baseline adenosine levels in vivo (r2 = 0.92, P = 0.018), is reduced after small-molecule inhibition of A2AR in mice (r2 = −0.62, P = 0.001) and humans (reduction in 5 of 7 patients, 70%), and is abrogated after A2AR knockout. Analysis of TCGA confirms a negative association between adenosine and overall survival (OS, HR = 0.6, P < 2.2e–16) as well as progression-free survival (PFS, HR = 0.77, P = 0.0000006). Further, adenosine signaling is associated with reduced OS (HR = 0.47, P < 2.2e–16) and PFS (HR = 0.65, P = 0.0000002) in CD8+ T-cell–infiltrated tumors. Mutation of TGFβ superfamily members is associated with enhanced adenosine signaling and worse OS (HR = 0.43, P < 2.2e–16). Finally, adenosine signaling is associated with reduced efficacy of anti-PD1 therapy in published cohorts (HR = 0.29, P = 0.00012).Conclusions:These data support the adenosine pathway as a mediator of a successful antitumor immune response, demonstrate the prognostic potential of the signature for immunotherapy, and inform patient selection strategies for adenosine pathway modulators currently in development.

Background: Loss of function in the tumor suppressor gene, PTEN, activates PI3K/AKT signaling, driving tumor growth. Somatic mutations in PTEN occur in 5-10% of estrogen-receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer (BC), and PTEN loss/inactivation is associated with an aggressive BC phenotype and poor outcome. Capivasertib, a pan-AKT kinase inhibitor, has shown antitumor activity in solid tumors. In ER+ BC, suppression of PI3K/AKT signaling results in a compensatory increase in ER-dependent transcription, potentially limiting the efficacy of AKT inhibitors when given as monotherapy. We therefore investigated concurrent inhibition of AKT and ER with combination therapy of capivasertib and fulvestrant in PTEN-mutant ER+ metastatic BC (MBC). Methods: In an expansion cohort (part F) of a Phase I study (NCT01226316), oral capivasertib 400 mg twice daily, 4 days on 3 days off, and fulvestrant at labeled dose, was administered to ER+ MBC patients (pts) with tumors harboring a deleterious PTEN alteration (identified in tissue/plasma by local next-generation sequencing [NGS], with central NGS and immunohistochemistry [IHC] performed retrospectively). Pts were enrolled in fulvestrant-naïve (FN) or fulvestrant-resistant (FR) cohorts (max 24 pts/cohort). Key objectives included safety and efficacy based on 24-week clinical benefit rate (CBR). Results: At data cut-off, 31 pts (12 FN; 19 FR) received treatment. Median number of prior metastatic regimens was 7. FN pts had higher rates of visceral disease (100%) and prior chemotherapy receipt (median 4 [range 0-8]) than FR pts (84%; median 2 [1-7]), respectively]. CBR and median progression-free survival (PFS) were 17% and 2.6 months in FN pts, and 37% and 4.1 months in FR pts, respectively (Table). Twenty-four patients (77%) had PTEN mutations and 7 (23%) had PTEN gene deletions determined by local NGS. Central plasma NGS confirmed 79% (19/24) of the PTEN mutations, and IHC confirmed complete loss of the PTENprotein in 85% (22/26) of cases. Treatment-related grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 32%, most frequently diarrhea and maculopapular rash (both n=2 pts). Treatment-related AEs resulted in dose reduction in 2 pts. Table. Clinical efficacyFN, n=12FR, n=19ORR, % (95% CI)8 (0.2, 39)21 (6, 46)CBR, % (95% CI)17 (2, 48)37 (16, 62)Confirmed response, n (%)1 (8)4 (21)Stable disease ≥24 weeks, n (%)2 (17)3 (16)Median PFS, months (95% CI)2.6 (1.2–4.2)4.1 (1.5–6.7)Median duration of response, months (95% CI)5.5 (NC–NC)6.9 (1.4–NC)Data cut-off was 21 March 2019. Median time from last fulvestrant administration to study entry in FR pts (n=19) was 13.8 months (range 0.7–28.2). CBR was defined as confirmed responders and those with stable disease ≥24 weeks. NC, not calculable (because of limited pt numbers); ORR, objective response rate Conclusions: Capivasertib plus fulvestrant is clinically active in heavily pretreated PTEN-mutated ER+ MBC, including in pts with prior resistance to fulvestrant. Efficacy appeared marginally better in FR than FN pts, possibly due to enrichment of pts with more aggressive disease in the FN cohort. Further analyses of the relationship between genomic features, such as concurrent mutations with drug activity, will be reported. Citation Format: Lillian M Smyth, Gerald Batist, Funda Meric-Bernstam, Peter Kabos, Iben Spanggaard, Ana Lluch, Alison Schram, Andrea Varga, Andrea Wong, Helen Ambrose, Alan Barnicle, T. Hedley Carr, Elza C de Bruin, Carolina Salinas-Souza, Andrew Foxley, Joana Hauser, Justin PO Lindemann, Rhiannon Maudsley, Robert McEwen, Michele Moschetta, Martine Roudier, Gaia Schiavon, Pedram Razavi, Udai Banerji, Sarat Chandarlapaty, José Baselga, David M Hyman. Capivasertib (AZD5363) in combination with fulvestrant in PTEN-mutant ER+ metastatic breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 2019 San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium; 2019 Dec 10-14; San Antonio, TX. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2020;80(4 Suppl):Abstract nr P1-19-05.

103 Background: Hormone receptor–positive breast cancer (HR+ BC) is the most common cause of BC-related death. Over half of metastatic recurrences occur ≥ 5 years (y) from diagnosis. Detection of minimal residual disease (MRD) via circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) can identify cancer recurrence months to years in advance and may be an important tool to guide therapy. Little is known about ctDNA in the late adjuvant setting. We investigated ctDNA dynamics and clinical outcomes in pts ≥ 5 y from diagnosis of high-risk early-stage HR+ BC. Methods: Patients with high-risk HR+ BC (T3-4 or N2-3 or T1 with 3+ lymph nodes, or T2N1 [and Oncotype RS ≥ 26; grade 3; or Ki-67 ≥ 20%]) with no evidence of recurrence 5 y after diagnosis were prospectively identified and consented. Plasma samples were collected at time of consent and at routine visits every 6-12 mos. Whole-exome sequencing (WES) was performed on primary tumor tissue to identify somatic mutations and design for each patient a RaDaR assay, a tumor-informed liquid biopsy test to detect plasma ctDNA. Per current practice standards, pts did not undergo regular surveillance imaging. All pts were followed for development of local and/or distant metastatic recurrence, as determined by their clinical provider. Results: Of 103 pts enrolled, 85 had sufficient tumor tissue, and 83 pts had successful WES. Personalized RaDaR assays were designed targeting 12-51 variants (median, 36), and used to test 219 plasma samples from 83 pts. The number of plasma samples per patient ranged from 1-7 (median, 2). 57 pts (68.7%) had stage 3 disease, and most (75, 90.4%) received curative-intent chemotherapy. All pts received endocrine therapy (ET). 39 (47%) remained on adjuvant ET at time of last follow up. Of 44 pts who completed adjuvant ET, 41 (93.2%) received > 5 y of treatment. Time from diagnosis to first sample ranged from 4.9-20 y (median, 8.4 y). Median (range) follow up was 10.2 (6.7-22.3) y from diagnosis and 1.8 (0-3.6) y from first sample. 5 pts (6%) developed distant metastatic recurrence and 2 pts (2.4%) had locoregional recurrence. 4/83 (5%) pts were MRD+ at study entry and 8/83 (10%) pts were MRD+ at any time point. 5/5 (100%) pts with metastatic recurrence were MRD+, with ctDNA lead times up to 37.6 mos. ctDNA was detected at tumor fractions of 0.0027-26.84% (median, 0.396%). 2/8 (25%) MRD+ pts had not had clinical recurrence at latest follow up, one with no follow up since detection and one 15.4 mos from ctDNA detection (with ctDNA levels 0.045% and 26.84%). Conclusions: Here we report—to our knowledge—the first data on ctDNA detection in late adjuvant HR+ BC. 10% of pts had MRD at ≥ 5 y from diagnosis. ctDNA analysis identified MRD in all cases of distant recurrence. ctDNA was detected in 2 pts who have not yet experienced recurrence. Longer follow up is necessary for these pts at high risk. Additional studies will determine if ctDNA-guided intervention can alter clinical outcomes.

Durvalumab is a programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) inhibitor with clinical activity in advanced urothelial cancer (AUC)1. AUC is characterized by several recurrent targetable genomic alterations2–5. This study ( NCT02546661 , BISCAY) combined durvalumab with relevant targeted therapies in biomarker-selected chemotherapy-refractory AUC populations including: (1) fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors in tumors with FGFR DNA alterations (FGFRm); (2) pharmacological inhibitor of the enzyme poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) in tumors with and without DNA homologous recombination repair deficiency (HRRm); and (3) TORC1/2 inhibitors in tumors with DNA alteration to the mTOR/PI3K pathway3–5.This trial adopted a new, biomarker-driven, multiarm adaptive design. Safety, efficacy and relevant biomarkers were evaluated. Overall, 391 patients were screened of whom 135 were allocated to one of six study arms. Response rates (RRs) ranged 9–36% across the study arms, which did not meet efficacy criteria for further development. Overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) were similar in the combination arms and durvalumab monotherapy arm. Biomarker analysis showed a correlation between circulating plasma-based DNA (ctDNA) and tissue for FGFRm. Sequential circulating tumor DNA analysis showed that changes to FGFRm correlated with clinical outcome. Our data support the clinical activity of FGFR inhibition and durvalumab monotherapy but do not show increased activity for any of the combinations. These findings question the targeted/immune therapy approach in AUC. The adaptive, biomarker-driven BISCAY trial evaluating durvalumab with targeted agents in patients with metastatic urothelial carcinoma based on tumor genomic alterations finds no added clinical benefit over durvalumab monotherapy.

PURPOSE The phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT signaling pathway is frequently activated in triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC). The AKT inhibitor capivasertib has shown preclinical activity in TNBC models, and drug sensitivity has been associated with activation of PI3K or AKT and/or deletions of PTEN. The PAKT trial was designed to evaluate the safety and efficacy of adding capivasertib to paclitaxel as first-line therapy for TNBC. PATIENTS AND METHODS This double-blind, placebo-controlled, randomized phase II trial recruited women with untreated metastatic TNBC. A total of 140 patients were randomly assigned (1:1) to paclitaxel 90 mg/m2 (days 1, 8, 15) with either capivasertib (400 mg twice daily) or placebo (days 2-5, 9-12, 16-19) every 28 days until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Secondary end points included overall survival (OS), PFS and OS in the subgroup with PIK3CA/ AKT1/ PTEN alterations, tumor response, and safety. RESULTS Median PFS was 5.9 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 4.2 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (hazard ratio [HR], 0.74; 95% CI, 0.50 to 1.08; 1-sided P = .06 [predefined significance level, 1-sided P = .10]). Median OS was 19.1 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 12.6 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (HR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.37 to 0.99; 2-sided P = .04). In patients with PIK3CA/ AKT1/ PTEN-altered tumors (n = 28), median PFS was 9.3 months with capivasertib plus paclitaxel and 3.7 months with placebo plus paclitaxel (HR, 0.30; 95% CI, 0.11 to 0.79; 2-sided P = .01). The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events in those treated with capivasertib plus paclitaxel versus placebo plus paclitaxel, respectively, were diarrhea (13% v 1%), infection (4% v 1%), neutropenia (3% v 3%), rash (4% v 0%), and fatigue (4% v 0%). CONCLUSION Addition of the AKT inhibitor capivasertib to first-line paclitaxel therapy for TNBC resulted in significantly longer PFS and OS. Benefits were more pronounced in patients with PIK3CA/ AKT1/ PTEN-altered tumors. Capivasertib warrants further investigation for treatment of TNBC.

PURPOSE: The activating mutation AKT1(E17K) occurs in ~7% of ER+ metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We report, from a multipart, first-in-human, Phase I study (NCT01226316), tolerability and activity of capivasertib, an oral AKT inhibitor, as monotherapy or combined with fulvestrant in expansion cohorts of AKT1(E17K)-mutant ER+ MBC patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with an AKT1(E17K) mutation, detected by local (NGS) or central (plasma-based BEAMing) testing, received capivasertib 480 mg bid, 4 days on, 3 days off, weekly or 400 mg bid combined with fulvestrant at the labeled dose. Study endpoints included safety, objective response rate (ORR; RECIST v1.1), progression-free survival (PFS) and clinical benefit rate at 24 weeks (CBR(24)). Biomarker analyses were conducted in the combination cohort. RESULTS: From October 2013 to August 2018, 63 heavily pretreated patients received capivasertib (20 monotherapy, 43 combination). ORR was 20% with monotherapy, and within the combination cohort was 36% in fulvestrant-pretreated and 20% in fulvestrant-naïve patients, although this latter group may have had more aggressive disease at baseline. AKT1(E17K) mutations were detectable in plasma by BEAMing (95%, 41/43), ddPCR (80%, 33/41) and NGS (76%, 31/41). A ≥50% decrease in AKT1(E17K) at cycle 2 day 1 was associated with improved PFS. Combination therapy appeared more tolerable than monotherapy (most frequent grade ≥3 adverse events: rash [9% vs 20%], hyperglycemia [5% vs 30%], diarrhea [5% vs 10%]). CONCLUSIONS: Capivasertib demonstrated clinically meaningful activity in heavily pretreated AKT1(E17K)-mutant ER+ MBC patients, including those with prior disease progression on fulvestrant. Tolerability and activity appeared improved by the combination.

The PI3Kα signaling pathway is frequently hyper-activated in breast cancer (BrCa), as a result of mutations/amplifications in oncogenes (e.g. HER2), decreased function in tumor suppressors (e.g. PTEN) or activating mutations in key components of the pathway. In particular, activating mutations of PIK3CA (~45%) are frequently found in luminal A BrCa samples. Genomic studies have uncovered inactivating mutations in MAP3K1 (13-20%) and MAP2K4 (~8%), two upstream kinases of the JNK apoptotic pathway in luminal A BrCa samples. Further, simultaneous mutation of PIK3CA and MAP3K1 are found in ~11% of mutant PIK3CA tumors. How these two alterations may cooperate to elicit tumorigenesis and impact the sensitivity to PI3K and AKT inhibitors is currently unknown. Using CRISPR gene editing we have genetically disrupted MAP3K1 expression in mutant PIK3CA cell lines to specifically create in vitro models reflecting the mutational status of PIK3CA and MAP3K1 in BrCa patients. MAP3K1 deficient cell lines exhibited ~2.4-fold increased proliferation rate and decreased sensitivity to PI3Kα/δ(AZD8835) and AKT (AZD5363) inhibitors (~2.61 and ~5.23-fold IC50 increases, respectively) compared with parental control cell lines. In addition, mechanistic analysis revealed that MAP3K1 disruption enhances AKT phosphorylation and downstream signaling and reduces sensitivity to AZD5363-mediated pathway inhibition. This appears to be a consequence of deficient MAP3K1-JNK signaling increasing IRS1 stability and therefore promoting IRS1 binding to p85, resulting in enhanced PI3Kα activity. Using 3D-MCF10A-PI3KαH1047R models, we found that MAP3K1 depletion increased overall acinar volume and counteracted AZD5363-mediated reduction of acinar growth due to enhanced proliferation and reduced apoptosis. Furthermore, in vivo efficacy studies revealed that MAP3K1-deficient MCF7 tumors were less sensitive to AKT inhibitor treatment, compared with parental MCF7 tumors. Our study provides mechanistic and in vivo evidence indicating a role for MAP3K1 as a tumor suppressor gene at least in the context of PIK3CA-mutant backgrounds. Further, our work predicts that MAP3K1 mutational status may be considered as a predictive biomarker for efficacy in PI3K pathway inhibitor trials.

Purpose: PTEN-null tumors become dependent on the PI3Kβ isoform and can be targeted by molecules such as the selective PI3Kβ inhibitor AZD8186. However, beyond the modulation of the canonical PI3K pathway, the consequences of inhibiting PI3Kβ are poorly defined. Experimental Design: To determine the broader impact of AZD8186 in PTEN-null tumors, we performed a genome-wide RNA-seq analysis of PTEN-null triple-negative breast tumor xenografts treated with AZD8186. Mechanistic consequences of AZD8186 treatment were examined across a number of PTEN-null cell lines and tumor models. Results: AZD8186 treatment resulted in modification of transcript and protein biomarkers associated with cell metabolism. We observed downregulation of cholesterol biosynthesis genes and upregulation of markers associated with metabolic stress. Downregulation of cholesterol biosynthesis proteins, such as HMGCS1, occurred in PTEN-null cell lines and tumor xenografts sensitive to AZD8186. Therapeutic inhibition of PI3Kβ also upregulated PDHK4 and increased PDH phosphorylation, indicative of reduced carbon flux into the TCA cycle. Consistent with this, metabolomic analysis revealed a number of changes in key carbon pathways, nucleotide, and amino acid biosynthesis. Conclusions: This study identifies novel mechanistic biomarkers of PI3Kβ inhibition in PTEN-null tumors supporting the concept that targeting PI3Kβ may exploit a metabolic dependency that contributes to therapeutic benefit in inducing cell stress. Considering these additional pathways will guide biomarker and combination strategies for this class of agents. Clin Cancer Res; 23(24); 7584–95. ©2017 AACR.

Purpose AKT1 E17K mutations are oncogenic and occur in many cancers at a low prevalence. We performed a multihistology basket study of AZD5363, an ATP-competitive pan-AKT kinase inhibitor, to determine the preliminary activity of AKT inhibition in AKT-mutant cancers. Patients and Methods Fifty-eight patients with advanced solid tumors were treated. The primary end point was safety; secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS) and response according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST). Tumor biopsies and plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) were collected in the majority of patients to identify predictive biomarkers of response. Results In patients with AKT1 E17K–mutant tumors (n = 52) and a median of five lines of prior therapy, the median PFS was 5.5 months (95% CI, 2.9 to 6.9 months), 6.6 months (95% CI, 1.5 to 8.3 months), and 4.2 months (95% CI, 2.1 to 12.8 months) in patients with estrogen receptor–positive breast, gynecologic, and other solid tumors, respectively. In an exploratory biomarker analysis, imbalance of the AKT1 E17K–mutant allele, most frequently caused by copy-neutral loss-of-heterozygosity targeting the wild-type allele, was associated with longer PFS (hazard ratio [HR], 0.41; P = .04), as was the presence of coincident PI3K pathway hotspot mutations (HR, 0.21; P = .045). Persistent declines in AKT1 E17K in cfDNA were associated with improved PFS (HR, 0.18; P = .004) and response ( P = .025). Responses were not restricted to patients with detectable AKT1 E17K in pretreatment cfDNA. The most common grade ≥ 3 adverse events were hyperglycemia (24%), diarrhea (17%), and rash (15.5%). Conclusion This study provides the first clinical data that AKT1 E17K is a therapeutic target in human cancer. The genomic context of the AKT1 E17K mutation further conditioned response to AZD5363.

Background Dynamic changes in circulating tumour DNA (ctDNA) levels may predict long-term outcome. We utilised samples from a phase I/II randomised trial (BEECH) to assess ctDNA dynamics as a surrogate for progression-free survival (PFS) and early predictor of drug efficacy. Patients and methods Patients with estrogen receptor-positive advanced metastatic breast cancer (ER+ mBC) in the BEECH study, paclitaxel plus placebo versus paclitaxel plus AKT inhibitor capivasertib, had plasma samples collected for ctDNA analysis at baseline and at multiple time points in the development cohort (safety run-in, part A) and validation cohort (randomised, part B). Baseline sample ctDNA sequencing identified mutations for longitudinal analysis and mutation-specific digital droplet PCR (ddPCR) assays were utilised to assess change in ctDNA abundance (allele fraction) between baseline and 872 on-treatment samples. Primary objective was to assess whether early suppression of ctDNA, based on pre-defined criteria from the development cohort, independently predicted outcome in the validation cohort. Results In the development cohort, suppression of ctDNA was apparent after 8 days of treatment (P = 0.014), with cycle 2 day 1 (4 weeks) identified as the optimal time point to predict PFS from early ctDNA dynamics. In the validation cohort, median PFS was 11.1 months in patients with suppressed ctDNA at 4 weeks and 6.4 months in patients with high ctDNA (hazard ratio = 0.20, 95% confidence interval 0.083–0.50, P

Genomic profiling of tumours in patients in clinical trials enables rapid testing of multiple hypotheses to confirm which genomic events determine likely responder groups for targeted agents. A key challenge of this new capability is defining which specific genomic events should be classified as 'actionable' (that is, potentially responsive to a targeted therapy), especially when looking for early indications of patient subgroups likely to be responsive to new drugs. This Opinion article discusses some of the different approaches being taken in early clinical development to define actionable mutations, and describes our strategy to address this challenge in early-stage exploratory clinical trials.

Selective phosphoinositide 3-kinase (PI3K)/AKT/mTOR inhibitors are currently under evaluation in clinical studies. To identify tumor types that are sensitive to PI3K pathway inhibitors we screened compounds targeting PI3Kα/δ (AZD8835), PI3Kβ/δ (AZD8186), AKT (AZD5363) and mTORC1/2 (AZD2014) against a cancer cell line panel (971 cell lines). There was an enrichment of hematological malignancies that were sensitive to AKT and mTOR inhibition, with the greatest degree of sensitivity observed in T-cell acute lymphoblastic leukemia (T-ALL). We found that all NOTCH mutant T-ALL cell lines were sensitive to AKT and mTORC1/2 inhibitors, with only partial sensitivity to agents that target the PI3K α, β or δ isoforms. Induction of apoptosis only occurred following AKTi treatment in cell lines with PTEN protein loss and high levels of active AKT. In summary, we have demonstrated that T-ALL cell lines show differential sensitivity to inhibition at different nodes in the PI3K/AKT/mTOR pathway and inhibiting AKT or mTOR may have a therapeutic benefit in this disease setting.

// James R. Bradford 1 , Mark Wappett 2 , Garry Beran 2 , Armelle Logie 2 , Oona Delpuech 2 , Henry Brown 2 , Joanna Boros 2 , Nicola J. Camp 3 , Robert McEwen 2 , Anne Marie Mazzola 4 , Celina D’Cruz 4 , Simon T. Barry 2 1 Department of Oncology and Metabolism, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, South Yorkshire, UK 2 Oncology iMED, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Alderley Park, Cheshire, UK 3 Department of Internal Medicine and Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, Utah, USA 4 Oncology iMED, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Gatehouse Park, Massachusetts, USA Correspondence to: James R. Bradford, e-mail: J.R.Bradford@sheffield.ac.uk Keywords: patient-derived xenograft, RNA-Seq, tumor stroma, biomarker discovery, pre-clinical research Received: November 09, 2015 Accepted: February 18, 2016 Published: March 09, 2016 ABSTRACT The tumor microenvironment is emerging as a key regulator of cancer growth and progression, however the exact mechanisms of interaction with the tumor are poorly understood. Whilst the majority of genomic profiling efforts thus far have focused on the tumor, here we investigate RNA-Seq as a hypothesis-free tool to generate independent tumor and stromal biomarkers, and explore tumor-stroma interactions by exploiting the human-murine compartment specificity of patient-derived xenografts (PDX). Across a pan-cancer cohort of 79 PDX models, we determine that mouse stroma can be separated into distinct clusters, each corresponding to a specific stromal cell type. This implies heterogeneous recruitment of mouse stroma to the xenograft independent of tumor type. We then generate cross-species expression networks to recapitulate a known association between tumor epithelial cells and fibroblast activation, and propose a potentially novel relationship between two hypoxia-associated genes, human MIF and mouse Ddx6 . Assessment of disease subtype also reveals MMP12 as a putative stromal marker of triple-negative breast cancer. Finally, we establish that our ability to dissect recruited stroma from trans-differentiated tumor cells is crucial to identifying stem-like poor-prognosis signatures in the tumor compartment. In conclusion, RNA-Seq is a powerful, cost-effective solution to global analysis of human tumor and mouse stroma simultaneously, providing new insights into mouse stromal heterogeneity and compartment-specific disease markers that are otherwise overlooked by alternative technologies. The study represents the first comprehensive analysis of its kind across multiple PDX models, and supports adoption of the approach in pre-clinical drug efficacy studies, and compartment-specific biomarker discovery.

BackgroundMutations in STK11 (STK11m) and frequently co-occurring KRAS mutations (KRASm/STK11m) are associated with poor survival in metastatic NSCLC (mNSCLC) immuno-oncology trials. There are limited data regarding the prognostic significance of these mutations in a real-world setting.MethodsThis retrospective cohort study analyzed de-identified electronic medical records from the Flatiron Clinico-Genomic database to identify patients with mNSCLC who had initiated first-line immunotherapy (IO; alone or in combination) or chemotherapy under routine care between January 1, 2013 and June 30, 2017. The primary objectives were to assess the prevalence of STK11m and KRASm/STK11m and to determine associations of these mutations with overall and progression-free survival (OS, PFS).ResultsOf 2407 patients with mNSCLC, STK11m and KRASm/STK11m were present in 13.6% and 6.5% of patients, respectively. Worse OS outcomes were observed in patients with STK11m versus STK11wt mNSCLC receiving IO (first-line, HR [95% CI], 1.4 [0.9-2.3; p = 0.1]; second-line [subset of first-line cohort], HR, 1.6 [1.3-2.0; p = 0.0002]) or chemotherapy (first-line, HR, 1.4 [1.2-1.6; p < 0.0001]); PFS outcomes showed similar trends. KRASm/STK11m double mutations were associated with worse OS and PFS outcomes versus KRASwt/STK11wt with IO and chemotherapy, similar to the single mutation (STK11m vs STK11wt) findings.ConclusionsThis large observational genomic study among patients receiving routine care highlights the negative prognostic impact of STK11m in patients with mNSCLC treated with IO or chemotherapy. These results complement previous clinical trial data and provide further evidence in the real world of a patient population that would benefit from new treatment options.

The cyclin dependent kinase (CDK)-retinoblastoma (RB)-E2F pathway plays a critical role in the control of cell cycle in estrogen receptor-positive (ER+) breast cancer. Small-molecule inhibitors of CDK4/6 have shown promise in this tumor type in combination with hormonal therapies, reflecting the particular dependence of this subtype of cancer on cyclin D1 and E2F transcription factors. mTOR inhibitors have also shown potential in clinical trials in this disease setting. Recent data have suggested cooperation between the PI3K/mTOR pathway and CDK4/6 inhibition in preventing early adaptation and eliciting growth arrest, but the mechanisms of the interplay between these pathways have not been fully elucidated. Here we show that profound and durable inhibition of ER+ breast cancer growth is likely to require multiple hits on E2F-mediated transcription. We demonstrate that inhibition of mTORC1/2 does not affect ER function directly, but does cause a decrease in cyclin D1 protein, RB phosphorylation, and E2F-mediated transcription. Combination of an mTORC1/2 inhibitor with a CDK4/6 inhibitor results in more profound effects on E2F-dependent transcription, which translates into more durable growth arrest and a delay in the onset of resistance. Combined inhibition of mTORC1/2, CDK4/6, and ER delivers even more profound and durable regressions in breast cancer cell lines and xenografts. Furthermore, we show that CDK4/6 inhibitor-resistant cell lines reactivate the CDK-RB-E2F pathway, but remain sensitive to mTORC1/2 inhibition, suggesting that mTORC1/2 inhibitors may represent an option for patients that have relapsed on CDK4/6 therapy. Mol Cancer Ther; 17(5); 908-20. ©2018 AACR., CRUK Cambridge Institute, Cambridge, UK (Jason Carroll, Igor Chernukhin, Rasmus Siersbæk3) Novo Nordisk Fonden (NNF 14136) (Rasmus Siersbæk)