From the physiological and anatomical point of view, the lateral visual field of the human operator is approximately 180�. Although a number of visual functions including visual acuity and the ability to detect light decrease in the peripheral regions, a normal observer generally makes discriminations out to 80� on either side of the midline and beyond. Such data as these are obtained primarily from standard experiments in which the subject, seated comfortably in an experimental room reports on the presence and nature of stimuli presented to his peripheral visual field. A different situation arises, however, When similar data are taken under non-standard laboratory conditions. If the subject is under physical or emotional stress, frightened, inexperienced, under the effects of drugs, etc., a decrement in the ability to detect peripheral stimuli is observed, This phenomenon has given rise to the concept of the functional visual field implying that although the anatomical and physiological mechanisms are present, stimuli presented to the periphery cannot be detected, or are detected at a lower level of efficiency, under conditions of stress. In connection with an experiment designed to determine the physiological effects of severe water loss as a result of heat stress, an opportunity was provided to also test the subject's ability to detect peripherally presented stimuli. Eight subjects worked on a standard treadmill according to a 20 minutes on-off duty cycle for six hours. The speed and inclination of the treadmill were adjusted so as to produce, on different days, either 5% or 2.5% weight loss. Half the subjects were male, half female, half lean and half obese. In addition, at the end of the 6 hour session, a maximum performance test was given to each subject. Data were obtained not only on the ability to detect peripheral thresholds, but also on central reaction time. The results indicate no effect whatsoever of any of the conditions of the experiment on any of the measurements taken. These data are in marked contrast to those of previous studies in which even the slightest changes in stimulus conditions produced loss of peripheral discrimination. The discrepancy between this and previous studies is attributed to the fact that the subjects had previous training in the use of the apparatus, that they were highly motivated, and that they were required to respond only for short prearranged duty cycles.