Search

INTRODUCTION Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is a condition that affects preterm infants, being the second leading cause of childhood blindness worldwide. The most commonly used treatments are cryotherapy or laser photocoagulation, but over the last few years, anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (anti-VEGF) drugs have gradually gained more adherents, mainly in the treatment of patients with type 1 retinopathy of prematurity (ET- ROP) Therefore, it is important to summarize the existing evidence to evaluate the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF drugs in type 1 retinopathy of prematurity. METHODS We searched in Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, which is maintained by screening multiple information sources, including MEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane, among others. We extracted data from the systematic reviews, reanalyzed data of primary studies, conducted a meta-analysis and generated a summary of findings table using the GRADE approach. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS We identified six systematic reviews including 15 studies overall, of which five were randomized trials. We conclude that the use of anti-VEGF compared to laser photocoagulation, probably reduces the risk of refractive errors. On the other hand, the use of anti-VEGF may result in little or no difference in the mortality at hospital discharge, lens or corneal opacity requiring surgery, and complete or partial retinal detachment, but the certainty of the evidence is low. Finally, it is not possible to clearly establish whether anti-VEGF compared with laser photocoagulation, increases the recurrence of retinopathy of prematurity, because the certainty of the existing evidence has been assessed as very low.

Introduction Polypoidal choroidal vasculopathy is characterized by multiple and recurrent serosanguineous detachments of the retinal pigment epithelium and aneurysmal protrusions in the choroidal vessels. Different therapeutic options have been proposed, including anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs and photodynamic therapy. Controversy exists as to whether combination therapy is superior to anti-vascular endothelial factor drugs alone. Methods We searched Epistemonikos, the largest database of systematic reviews in health, maintained by screening multiple sources of information, including MEDLINE/PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane. We extracted data from the identified reviews, analyzed the data from the primary studies, performed a meta-analysis, and prepared a summary table of the results using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method. Results We identified three systematic reviews that together included twelve primary studies. Of these, two were randomized trials, and only one of them was included in the analysis. Conclusions The addition of photodynamic therapy may result in little or no difference in the incidence of retinal hemorrhage and visual acuity gain at six months (low certainty of evidence). On the other hand, the combination of photodynamic therapy and anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs compared to anti-vascular endothelial growth factor alone is likely to increase polyp regression at three and six months and reduce central retinal thickness at six months.