1. Complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area: worldwide expert consensus.
- Author
-
Sotelo R, Sayegh AS, Medina LG, Perez LC, La Riva A, Eppler MB, Gaona J, Tobias-Machado M, Spiess PE, Pettaway CA, Lima Pompeo AC, Lima Mattos PA, Wilson TG, Villoldo GM, Chung E, Samaniego A, Ornellas AA, Pinheiro V, Brazão ES Jr, Subira-Rios D, Koifman L, Zequi SC, Pontillo Z HM, Rodrigues Calixto JR, Campos Silva R, Smithers BM, Garzon S, Haase O, Sommariva A, Fruscio R, Martins F, de Oliveira PS, Levi Sandri GB, Clementi M, Astigueta J, Metwally IH, Bharathan R, Jindal T, Nakamura Y, Abdel Mageed H, Jeevarajan S, Rodriguez Lay R, García-Perdomo HA, Rodríguez González O, Ghodoussipour S, Gill I, and Cacciamani GE
- Subjects
- Humans, Female, Male, Surveys and Questionnaires, Lymph Node Excision adverse effects, Lymph Node Excision methods, Penile Neoplasms surgery, Penile Neoplasms pathology, Postoperative Complications etiology, Postoperative Complications epidemiology, Vulvar Neoplasms surgery, Vulvar Neoplasms pathology, Consensus, Melanoma surgery, Melanoma pathology, Delphi Technique, Inguinal Canal surgery
- Abstract
Background: Inguinal lymph node dissection plays an important role in the management of melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. Inguinal lymph node dissection is associated with various intraoperative and postoperative complications with significant heterogeneity in classification and reporting. This lack of standardization challenges efforts to study and report inguinal lymph node dissection outcomes. The aim of this study was to devise a system to standardize the classification and reporting of inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications by creating a worldwide collaborative, the complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area (CALI) group., Methods: A modified 3-round Delphi consensus approach surveyed a worldwide group of experts in inguinal lymph node dissection for melanoma, penile and vulval cancer. The group of experts included general surgeons, urologists and oncologists (gynaecological and surgical). The survey assessed expert agreement on inguinal lymph node dissection perioperative complications. Panel interrater agreement and consistency were assessed as the overall percentage agreement and Cronbach's α., Results: Forty-seven experienced consultants were enrolled: 26 (55.3%) urologists, 11 (23.4%) surgical oncologists, 6 (12.8%) general surgeons and 4 (8.5%) gynaecology oncologists. Based on their expertise, 31 (66%), 10 (21.3%) and 22 (46.8%) of the participants treat penile cancer, vulval cancer and melanoma using inguinal lymph node dissection respectively; 89.4% (42 of 47) agreed with the definitions and inclusion as part of the inguinal lymph node dissection intraoperative complication group, while 93.6% (44 of 47) agreed that postoperative complications should be subclassified into five macrocategories. Unanimous agreement (100%, 37 of 37) was achieved with the final standardized classification system for reporting inguinal lymph node dissection complications in melanoma, vulval cancer and penile cancer., Conclusion: The complications and adverse events in lymphadenectomy of the inguinal area classification system has been developed as a tool to standardize the assessment and reporting of complications during inguinal lymph node dissection for the treatment of melanoma, vulval and penile cancer., (© The Author(s) 2024. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of BJS Foundation Ltd.)
- Published
- 2024
- Full Text
- View/download PDF