Search

Preclinical studies of 2-chlorodeoxyadenosine (2-CdA) against solid tumors in the human tumor cloning assay and evidence that 2-CdA is active against slow-growing or resting tumor cells have stimulated interest in the clinical activity of this agent against solid tumors. This study sought to estimate the maximum tolerated dose, dose-limiting toxicity, and plasma and urine pharmacokinetics accompanying the intravenous administration of 2-CdA by 120-h continuous infusion in patients with solid tumors. Treated patients were also assessed for other toxicities of therapy and for antitumor response. A total of 23 patients received 35 courses of treatment given at doses of 3.5, 5.3, 6.5 and 8.1 mg/m2 per day by continuous intravenous infusion for 5 days and repeated every 28 days. Blood and urine specimens were collected before, during, and after drug infusion. The dose-limiting toxicity at 8.1 mg/m2 per day manifested as granulocytopenia in 2 of 5 patients (3 of 7 courses of treatment) and as thrombocytopenia in 3 of 5 patients (3 of 7 courses of treatment). At the dose levels of 6.5 and 8.1 mg/m2 per day, recovery from thrombocytopenia was often delayed. Severe lymphocytopenia (< 1,000/microliters) was observed at all dose levels of 2-CdA. Dose-related anemia and leukopenia were observed and were infrequently severe. Non-hematological toxicities were confined to mild-to-moderate nausea, vomiting, fatigue, and anorexia. Fever of 37 degrees-40 degrees C was induced during drug infusion in 19 patients. No antitumor response was observed. Average plasma concentrations at steady-state (Cpss) ranged from 3 ng/ml at the initial dose level to 13 ng/ml at the dose level of 8.1 mg/m2 per day. Both the Cpss and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) were proportional to the dose. A relationship was observed between the percentage of change in absolute neutrophil count and the AUC. Renal excretion accounted for only 18% of the elimination of 2-CdA over the 5-day infusion period. The maximum tolerated dose for 2-CdA given by 5-day continuous infusion was 8.1 mg/m2 per day in this study. The recommended dose on this schedule for phase II studies is 6.5 mg/m2 per day. Granulocytopenia and thrombocytopenia were dose-limiting. No antitumor activity was observed during this study. On the basis of the plasma concentrations of 2-CdA observed, it is unlikely that this schedule of drug administration will permit achievement of the concentrations consistent with antitumor activity observed in preclinical studies. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

The emergence, spread, and persistence of antimicrobial resistance (AMR) remains a pressing global concern. Increased promotion of commercial small-scale agriculture within low-resource settings has facilitated an increased use in antimicrobials as growth promoters globally, creating antimicrobial-resistant animal reservoirs. We conducted a longitudinal field study in rural Ecuador to monitor the AMR of Escherichia coli populations from backyard chickens and children at three sample periods with approximately 2-month intervals (February, April, and June 2017). We assessed AMR to 12 antibiotics using generalized linear mixed effects models (GLMM). We also sampled and assessed AMR to the same 12 antibiotics in one-day-old broiler chickens purchased from local venders. One-day-old broiler chickens showed lower AMR at sample period 1 compared to sample period 2 (for 9 of the 12 antibiotics tested); increases in AMR between sample periods 2 and 3 were minimal. Two months prior to the first sample period (December 2016) there was no broiler farming activity due to a regional collapse followed by a peak in annual farming in February 2017. Between sample periods 1 and 2, we observed significant increases in AMR to 6 of the 12 antibiotics in children and to 4 of the 12 antibiotics in backyard chickens. These findings suggest that the recent increase in farming, and the observed increase of AMR in the one-day old broilers, may have caused the increase in AMR in backyard chickens and children. Small-scale farming dynamics could play an important role in the spread of AMR in low- and middle-income countries., Competing Interests: The authors do not have any conflict of interest regarding this research., (© 2019 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V.)

An E1B 55 kDa gene-deleted adenovirus, Onyx-015, which reportedly selectively replicates in and lyses p53-deficient cells, was administered by a single intratumoral injection to a total of 22 patients with recurrent head and neck cancer. The objectives of this Phase I study were to determine the safety, feasibility, and efficacy of this therapy and determine any correlation to p53 status. Six cohorts were investigated with a dose escalation from 10(7)-10(11) plaque-forming units. Toxicity was assessed using NCIC criteria. Tumor response was assessed by clinical and radiological measurement. Blood samples were taken to detect adenovirus DNA and neutralizing antibody to adenovirus. Tumor biopsies were taken to detect adenovirus by in situ hybridization. Treatment was well tolerated, with the main toxicity being grade 1/2 flu-like symptoms. Dose-limiting toxicity was not reached at the highest dose of 10(11) plaque-forming units. Twenty-one of the 22 patients treated showed an increase in neutralizing antibody to adenovirus. In situ hybridization showed viral replication in 4 of 22 patients treated, all of whom had mutant p53 tumors. Using conventional response criteria, no objective responses were observed. However, magnetic resonance imaging scans were suggestive of tumor necrosis at the site of viral injection in five patients, three of whom were classified using nonconventional criteria as partial responders, and two of whom were classified using nonconventional criteria as minor responders. Of these five cases, four had mutant p53 tumors. The response duration for the three partial responders was 4, 8, and 12 weeks. An additional eight patients had stable disease in the injected tumors lasting from 4-8 weeks. These preliminary results show that intratumoral administration of Onyx-015 is feasible, well tolerated, and associated with biological activity. Further investigation of Onyx-015, particularly with a more frequent injection protocol and in combination with systemic chemotherapy, is warranted.

Purpose: We conducted a phase I dose-escalation trial of orally administered irinotecan (CPT-11) to characterize the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), pharmacokinetic profile, and antitumor effects in patients with refractory malignancies., Patients and Methods: CPT-11 solution for intravenous (IV) use was mixed with CranGrape juice (Ocean Spray, Lakeville-Middleboro, MA) and administered orally once per day for 5 days every 3 weeks to 28 patients. Starting dosages ranged from 20 to 100 mg/m2/d., Results: Grade 4 delayed diarrhea was the DLT at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage in patients younger than 65 years of age and at the 66 mg/m2/d dosage in patients 65 or older. The other most clinically significant toxicity of oral CPT-11 was neutropenia. A linear relationship was found between dose, peak plasma concentration, and area under the concentration-time curve (AUC) for both CPT-11 and SN-38 lactone, implying no saturation in the conversion of irinotecan to SN-38. The mean metabolic ratio ([AUC(SN-38 total) + AUC(SN-38G total)]/AUC(CPT-11 total)) was 0.7 to 0.8, which suggests that oral dosing results in presystemic conversion of CPT-11 to SN-38. An average of 72% of SN-38 was maintained in the lactone form during the first 24 hours after drug administration. One patient with previously treated colorectal cancer and liver metastases who received oral CPT-11 at the 80 mg/m2/d dosage achieved a confirmed partial response., Conclusion: The MTD and recommended phase II dosage for oral CPT-11 is 66 mg/m2/d in patients younger than 65 years of age and 50 mg/m2/d in patients 65 or older, administered daily for 5 days every 3 weeks. The DLT of diarrhea is similar to that observed with IV administration of CPT-11. The biologic activity and favorable pharmacokinetic characteristics make oral administration of CPT-11 an attractive option for further clinical development.

The authors evaluated the activity and toxicity of docetaxel given as a 1-hour infusion every 21 days in patients with unresectable cholangiocarcinoma. Seventeen patients with cytologically or histologically confirmed cholangiocarcinoma received intravenous docetaxel over 1 hour, repeated every 21 days. The initial dose of docetaxel was 100 mg/m2, with a subsequent 25% dose reduction for patients experiencing grade 3 or 4 toxicities. Treatment was continued until disease progression or occurrence of intolerable side effects. All patients received premedication with dexamethasone 8 mg by mouth twice daily for 5 days, starting 1 day before docetaxel infusion. Sixteen of the 17 patients were assessable for response and toxicity; one patient was removed from the trial for intercurrent illness. Thirty-eight cycles of docetaxel were delivered (median, two cycles). No complete or partial responses were noted. Fourteen patients had progressive disease, one patient had stable disease, and one patient died of septic shock shortly after starting treatment. Granulocytopenia was the dose-limiting toxicity. Thirteen patients had grade 4 granulocytopenia, 11 of whom required antibiotics for neutropenic fever. Granulocytopenia was the only grade 4 toxicity observed. Grade 3 toxicities included stomatitis, anemia, fatigue, vomiting, and hypotension. Grade 1 or 2 toxicities included alopecia, diarrhea, peripheral edema, myalgias, and anorexia. Administered on this dose and schedule, docetaxel lacked activity in patients with cholangiocarcinoma. The toxicity profile, including dose-limiting granulocytopenia, has been previously described in patients receiving docetaxel.

A Phase I and pharmacological study was performed to evaluate the feasibility, maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), and pharmacokinetics of the anthrapyrazole losoxantrone in combination with paclitaxel in adult patients with advanced solid malignancies. Losoxantrone was administered as a 10-min infusion in combination with paclitaxel on either a 24- or 3-h schedule. The starting dose level was 40 mg/m2 losoxantrone and 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel (as a 24- or 3-h i.v. infusion) without granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF). Administration of these agents at the starting dose level and dose escalation was feasible only with G-CSF support. The following dose levels (losoxantrone/paclitaxel, in mg/m2) of losoxantrone and paclitaxel as a 3-h infusion were also evaluated: 50/135, 50/175, 50/200, 50/225, and 60/225. The sequence-dependent toxicological and pharmacological effects of losoxantrone and paclitaxel on the 24- and 3-h schedules of paclitaxel were also assessed. The MTD was defined as the dose at which >50% of the patients experienced DLT during the first two courses of therapy. DLTs, mainly myelosuppression, occurring during the first course of therapy were noted in four of six and five of eight patients treated with 40 mg/m2 losoxantrone and 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel over 24 and 3 h, respectively, without G-CSF. DLTs during the first two courses of therapy were observed in one of six patients at the 50/175 (losoxantrone/paclitaxel) mg/m2 dose level, two of four patients at the 50/200 mg/m2 dose level, one of four patients at the 50/225 mg/m2 dose level, and two of five patients at the 60/225 mg/m2 dose level. The degree of thrombocytopenia was worse, albeit not statistically significant, when 24-h paclitaxel preceded losoxantrone, with a mean percentage decrement in platelet count during course 1 of 80.7%, compared to 43.8% with the reverse sequence (P = 0.19). Losoxantrone clearance was not significantly altered by the sequence or schedule of paclitaxel. Cardiac toxicity was observed; however, it was not related to total cumulative dose of losoxantrone. An unacceptably high rate of DLTs at the first dose level of 40 mg/m2 losoxantrone and 135 mg/m2 paclitaxel administered as either a 24- or 3-h i.v. infusion precluded dose escalation without G-CSF support. The addition of G-CSF to the regimen permitted further dose escalation without reaching the MTD. Losoxantrone at 50 mg/m2 followed by paclitaxel (3-h i.v. infusion) at 175 mg/m2 with G-CSF support is recommended for further clinical trials.

Prolonged exposure to topotecan in in vitro and in vivo experiments has yielded the highest antitumor efficacy. An oral formulation of topotecan with a bioavailability of 32-44% in humans enables convenient prolonged administration. Pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationships from four Phase I studies with different schedules of administration of oral topotecan in 99 adult patients with malignant solid tumors refractory to standard forms of chemotherapy were compared. Topotecan was administered as follows: (a) once daily (o.d.) for 5 days every 21 days (29 patients); (b) o.d. for 10 days every 21 days (19 patients); (c) twice daily (b.i.d.) for 10 days every 21 days (20 patients); and (d) b.i.d. for 21 days every 28 days (31 patients). Pharmacokinetic analysis was performed in 55 patients using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Totals of 109, 48, 64, and 59 courses were given, respectively. Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of granulocytopenia for the o.d. x 5-day dosage, a combination of myelosuppression and diarrhea in both of the 10-day schedules, and only diarrhea in the 21-day schedule. Pharmacokinetics revealed a substantial variation of the area under curve (AUC) of topotecan lactone in all of the dose schedules with a mean intrapatient variation of 25.4 +/- 31.0% (o.d. x 5), 34.5 +/- 25.0% (o.d. x 10), 96.5 +/- 70.1% (b.i.d. x 10), and 59.5 +/- 51.0% (b.i.d. x 21). Significant correlations were observed between myelotoxicity parameters and AUC(t) day 1 and AUC(t) per course of topotecan lactone. In all of the studies, similar sigmoidal relationships could be established between AUC(t) per course and the percentage decrease of WBCs. At maximum-tolerated dose level, no significant difference in AUC(t) per course was found [AUC(t) per course was 107.4 +/- 33.7 ng x h/ml (o.d. x 5), 145.3 +/- 23.8 ng x h/ml (o.d. x 10), 100.0 +/- 41.5 ng x h/ml (b.i.d. x 10), and 164.9 +/- 92.2 ng x h/ml (b.i.d. x 21), respectively.] For oral topotecan, the schedule rather than the AUC(t)-per-course seemed to be related to the type of toxicity. Prolonged oral administration resulted in intestinal side effects as a dose-limiting toxicity, and short-term administration resulted in granulocytopenia. On the basis of this pharmacokinetic study, no schedule preference could be expressed, but based on patient convenience, administration once daily for 5 days could be favored.

Purpose: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine possess broad spectra of clinical activity, distinct mechanisms of cytotoxicity, and are differentially affected by mutations in cell-cycle regulatory proteins, such as bcl-2. This phase I trial was designed to identify the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and dose limiting toxicities (DLT) of paclitaxel and gemcitabine when both drugs were given together on a once-every-two-week schedule in patients with solid tumors., Patients and Methods: A total of 37 patients were treated at nine different dose levels ranging from paclitaxel 75-175 mg/m2 administered over three hours followed by gemcitabinc 1500-3500 mg/m2 administered over 30-60 minutes. Both drugs were administered on day 1 of a 14-day cycle. Dose escalation was performed in a stepwise manner in which the dose of one drug was escalated while the dose of the other drug was kept constant., Results: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was observed at dose level 9: paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m2 in the form of grade 4 neutropenia lasting for > or = 5 days (one patient) and grade 3 elevation of alanine aminotransferase (AST/SGPT) (one patient). An analysis of delivered dose intensity (DI) over the first three cycles revealed that higher dosages of both drugs were delivered at dose level 7, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m2 dose level, than at the MTD, dose level 8, paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3500 mg/m2. Partial responses were confirmed in two patients with transitional cell carcinoma (one of the bladder, one of the renal pelvis) and in one patient with adenocarcinoma of unknown primary., Conclusions: Paclitaxel and gemcitabine is a promising drug combination that can be administered safely and repetitively on an every-other-week schedule. Using this drug administration schedule, the recommended phase II dose is paclitaxel 150 mg/m2 and gemcitabine 3000 mg/m2.

Prolonged exposure to topotecan (TPT) in in vitro experiments and in vivo studies in animals yielded the highest antitumor efficacy. An oral bioavailability of TPT of 32-44% enables convenient prolonged administration. Because of unpredictable diarrhea in the third week of the twice daily (b.i.d.) 21-day schedule of p.o. administered TPT and the finding of optimal down-regulation of topoisomerase I level after 10-14 days in mononuclear peripheral blood cells, a shorter period of administration (10 days) was chosen for Phase I and pharmacological studies of oral administration of TPT. Adult patients with malignant solid tumors that were refractory to standard forms of chemotherapy were entered. Two dose schedules were studied: once daily (o.d.) and b.i.d. administration for 10 days every 3 weeks. TPT o.d. for 10 days was studied at dose levels 1.0, 1.4, and 1.6 mg/m2/day, and dose levels were 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, and 0.8 mg/m2 with the 10-day b.i.d. schedule. Pharmacokinetics were performed on days 1 and 8 of the first course using a validated high-performance liquid chromatographic assay and noncompartmental pharmacokinetic methods. Nineteen patients were entered in the 10-day o.d. schedule, with a total of 48 courses given. Dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) was reached at 1.6 mg/m2/day and consisted of common toxicity criteria (CTC) grade IV thrombocytopenia and CTC grade III diarrhea. The maximum tolerated dose was 1.4 mg/m2/day. In the 10-day b.i.d. administration of TPT, a total of 64 courses were studied in 20 patients. DLT was reached at a dose of 0.8 mg/m2 b.i.d. and consisted of CTC grade IV myelosuppression and CTC grade IV diarrhea. The maximum tolerated dose was 0.7 mg/m2 b.i.d. Nonhematological toxicities with both schedules included mild nausea and vomiting, fatigue, and anorexia. Pharmacokinetics revealed a substantial variation of the area under the plasma concentration-time curve of TPT lactone in both schedules. Significant correlations were observed between the myelotoxicity parameters and the area under the plasma concentration-time curve at day 1 of TPT lactone o.d. and b.i.d. The DLT of 10 daily administrations of oral topotecan every 3 weeks consisted of a combination of myelosuppression and diarrhea for both schedules studied. The recommended doses for Phase II studies are 1.4 mg/m2/day for 10 days for the o.d. administration and 0.7 mg/m2 for the b.i.d. schedule.

Despite the widespread usage of hydroxyurea in the treatment of both malignant and nonmalignant diseases and a recent expansion in the recognition of its potential therapeutic applications, there have been few detailed studies of hydroxyurea's pharmacokinetic (PK) behavior and oral bioavailability. Parenteral administration schedules have been evaluated because of concerns about the possibility for significant interindividual variability in the PK behavior and bioavailability of hydroxyurea after oral administration. In this PK and bioavailability study, 29 patients with advanced solid malignancies were randomized to treatment with 2, 000 mg hydroxyurea administered either orally or as a 30-minute intravenous (IV) infusion accompanied by extensive plasma and urine sampling for PK studies. After 3 weeks of treatment with hydroxyurea (80 mg/kg orally every 3 days followed by a 1-week washout period), patients were crossed over to the alternate route of administration, at which time extensive PK studies were repeated. Three days later, patients continued treatment with 80 mg/kg hydroxyurea orally every 3 days for 3 weeks, followed by a 1-week rest period. Thereafter, 80 mg/kg hydroxyurea was administered orally every 3 days. Twenty-two of 29 patients had extensive plasma and urine sampling performed after treatment with both oral and IV hydroxyurea. Oral bioavailability (F) averaged 108%. Moreover, interindividual variability in F was low, as indicated by 19 of 22 individual F values within a narrow range of 85% to 127% and a modest coefficient of variation of 17%. The time in which maximum plasma concentrations (Cmax) were achieved averaged 1.22 hours with an average lag time of 0.22 hours after oral administration. Except for Cmax, which was 19. 5% higher after IV drug administration, the PK profiles of oral and IV hydroxyurea were very similar. The plasma disposition of hydroxyurea was well described by a linear two-compartment model. The initial harmonic mean half-lives for oral and IV hydroxyurea were 1.78 and 0.63 hours, respectively, and the harmonic mean terminal half-lives were 3.32 and 3.39 hours, respectively. For IV hydroxyurea, systemic clearance averaged 76.16 mL/min/m2 and the mean volume of distribution at steady-state was 19.71 L/m2, whereas Cloral/F and Voral/F averaged 73.16 mL/min/m2 and 19.65 L/m2, respectively, after oral administration. The percentage of the administered dose of hydroxyurea that was excreted unchanged into the urine was nearly identical after oral and IV administration-36. 84% and 35.82%, respectively. Additionally, the acute toxic effects of hydroxyurea after treatment on both routes were similar. Relationships between pertinent PK parameters and the principal toxicity, neutropenia, were sought, but no pharmacodynamic relationships were evident. From PK, bioavailability, and toxicologic standpoints, these results indicate that there are no clear advantages for administering hydroxyurea by the IV route except in situations when oral administration is not possible and/or in the case of severe gastrointestinal impairment.

In this phase I study, terephthalamidine was administered as a 120-hour continuous infusion repeated every 21 days. Thirteen patients received 27 courses of terephthalamidine at four dose levels ( 14, 28, 46, and 70 mg/m2/day). Dose-limiting toxicity consisted of profound and intractable anorexia, weight loss and prostration in all patients. Toxicity was delayed and accompanied by hyponatremia and hypokalemia. No hematologic or other toxicity was documented. One patient with adenocarcinoma of the lung had a 40% decrease in mediastinal lymph nodes and resolution of a pleural effusion lasting 2 months. Pharmacokinetic analysis by HPLC was performed in all patients during their first course. The harmonic mean terminal half-life for terephthalamidine was 23 hours with a plasma clearance of 1.7 1/hr/m2. Both plasma concentrations achieved during infusion (r2 = 0.9) and area under the curve (AUC) (r2 = 0.8) were proportional to increase in dose (p < 0.002). Renal excretion accounted for 64% of the total cumulative dose, with an average renal clearance of 1.16 1/hr/m2. Due to the unacceptable toxicity seen at all doses with this schedule, no further studies are recommended unless the mechanism of toxicity is better understood and can be prevented.

Vinorelbine (Navelbine) is a unique semi-synthetic vinca-alkaloid with a favorable safety profile that has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in patients with non-small cell lung cancer, advanced breast cancer, advanced ovarian cancer and Hodgkin's disease. The most common dose-limiting toxicity is neutropenia, while other reported toxicities are minimal. Mitoxantrone (Novantrone) is an anthracene derivative that has demonstrated antitumor activity in patients with breast cancer, ovarian cancer, acute leukemia, and lymphoma. Mitoxantrone also has a very favorable toxicity profile with significantly less nausea and vomiting, alopecia, and stomatitis as compared with anthracyclines. The dose-limiting toxicity for mitoxantrone is leukopenia. The study was designed to determine the safety and maximally tolerated dose of IV vinorelbine used in combination with a fixed dose of mitoxantrone for the treatment of patients with refractory solid tumors. Vinorelbine was administered on days 1 and 8 of the treatment regimen as a short IV infusion. The starting dose was 15 mg/m2. Mitoxantrone was administered as a 20-min infusion on day 1 only at a fixed dose of 10 mg/m2. Seventeen patients with solid malignancies were entered in the study. For personal reasons, one patient decided to discontinue the treatment after day 1 of cycle 1. Therefore, 16 patients were evaluable for toxicity. The main toxicity was myelosuppression which was dose-limiting and resulted in dose reductions and delays. The use of G-CSF had a minimal overall impact on this regimen. Stable disease was observed in three cases. In patients previously treated with chemotherapy, the maximally tolerated dose was defined as vinorelbine 20 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and mitoxantrone 10 mg/m2 on day 1 without growth factor support. These doses can be recommended for phase II study of the regimen as salvage treatment.

Adozelesin, a synthetic analog of the antitumor antibiotic CC-1065, is a novel cytotoxic agent which inhibits DNA synthesis by binding to the minor groove of the DNA helix. Preclinical studies have shown a broad spectrum of activity against a variety of murine and human tumor xenograft models. We conducted a phase I study of adozelesin to (i) determine a recommended dose for phase II testing using a 10 min i.v. infusion, (ii) characterize the toxic effects of the drug using this schedule and (iii) document any antitumor activity observed. Adozelesin was administered as an i.v. infusion every 6 weeks. CBC and biological parameters were performed weekly. The starting dose of 10 microg/m2, corresponding to 1/30 the mouse equivalent lethal dose, was escalated, according to a modified Fibonacci scheme, until dose-limiting toxicity was encountered. Forty-seven adult patients with solid malignancies were entered in the study. Successive dose levels used were 10, 20, 33, 50, 70, 105, 120, 150 and 180 microg/m2. The main toxic effect was myelosuppression, which was dose limiting. The maximally tolerated dose was defined as 180 microg/m2. A minor response with a 4 month duration was reported in one previously treated patient with melanoma. We conclude that the recommended phase II dose of adozelesin given as a 10 min infusion is 150 microg/m2, repeated every 4 weeks.

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the feasibility of chronic oral administration of etoposide with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) [sargramostim (Immunex)] coadministration or premedication; to estimate and compare the frequency of toxicities accompanying etoposide administration alone, etoposide/GM-CSF coadministration and etoposide with GM-CSF premedication. Thirty-nine patients with advanced treatment-refractory malignancies were enrolled to this study. Eligible patients were randomized to one of three treatment arms: daily oral etoposide alone for 21 days (arm A); daily oral etoposide for 21 days with GM-CSF, 250 micrograms/m2, s.c. twice daily for the first 10 days of etoposide administration (arm B); or daily oral etoposide for 21 days with GM-CSF twice daily for the sixth through second days preceding etoposide administration (arm C). Courses of treatment were repeated every 28 days. Etoposide dosages for each arm were 25, 50, 75 and 100 mg/m2/day. At least three patients were treated at each dosage level until dose-limiting toxicity was observed. Patients had twice weekly blood counts and weekly clinical examinations to assess toxicity. Patients with measurable or evaluable evidence of cancer were assessed for antitumor response after every other course of therapy. Nadir neutrophil counts at each dosage level were compared between treatment arms by non-parametric Wilcoxen rank sum tests. GM-CSF coadministration (arm B) or premedication (arm C) with daily chronic oral etoposide was feasible and did not lead to excessive hematological toxicity. Pairwise comparisons of neutrophil nadirs for the first course of therapy for each treatment arm did not demonstrate any significant differences and, at most, a slight trend favoring improved neutrophil nadirs was shown for arm C compared to arm A (p = 0.07). Dose intensity as measured by mean days of etoposide administered per patient for each arm suggested only slight improvement in etoposide tolerance for treatment arms B and C. The conclusion, GM-CSF can be safely administered to patients receiving chronic daily oral etoposide. It appears that GM-CSF provides no clinically useful improvement in granulocyte tolerance of therapy.

We have conducted a study of ilmofosine (1-hexadecylthio; 2-methoxyethyl-rac-glycero-3-phosphocholine) in non-small cell bronchogenic carcinoma, using a schedule of continuous infusion for 5 days and a dose of 300 mg/m2/day. Toxicities were gastrointestinal (nausea, vomiting, diarrhea), fatigue and liver function abnormalities. These were severe and resulted in the removal of some patients from study. No consistent pattern of bone marrow suppression was seen. No tumor regressions occurred in 14 evaluable patients including 5 with no prior therapy. We conclude that ilmofosine is inactive in this tumor at this dose and schedule.

Twenty-nine patients with persistent, recurrent and/or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck were treated daily for five days at three-week intervals with topotecan 1.5 mg/m2. Four patients received prior chemotherapy, 23 prior surgery and 29 prior radiation therapy. Of the 29 eligible patients, 8 patients were not evaluable for response and were assumed to be non-responders. Of the remaining 21 evaluable patients, there were zero responses (0%, 95% confidence interval [0,.12]). The most common toxicities were myelosuppression, dyspnea and malaise/fatigue/lethargy. Topotecan has limited activity in advanced head and neck cancer with this dose and schedule.