Search

Objectives: The objective is to assess the impact of the quality of tissue fixation in surgical pathology on immunohistochemical (IHC) staining and DNA degradation. Materials and methods: Twenty-five non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) resection specimens were analyzed. After resection, all tumors were processed according to the protocols in our center. In haematoxylin and eosin (H&E) stained tissue slides, adequately- and inadequately fixed tumor areas were microscopically demarcated, based on basement membrane detachment. In 10 IHC stains ALK (clone 5A4), PD-L (clone 22C3), CAM5.2, CK7, c-Met, KER-MNF116, NapsinA, p40, ROS1, TTF1) the immunoreactivity in H-scores was determined in adequately- and inadequately fixed, and necrotic tumor areas. From the same areas DNA was isolated, and DNA fragmentation in base pairs (bp) was measured. Results: H-scores were significantly higher in H&E adequately fixed tumor areas in IHC stains KER-MNF116 (H-score 256 vs 15, p=0.001) and p40 (H-score 293 vs 248, p=0.028). All other stains showed a trend towards higher immunoreactivity in H&E adequately fixed areas. Independent of H&E adequatelty- or inadequately fixed areas, all IHC stains showed significant different IHC staining intensity within tumors, suggesting heterogeneous immunoreactivity (H-scores: PD-L1 123 vs 6, p = 0.001; CAM5.2 242 vs 101, p=16 h) and short fixation time (24 h). Conclusions: Impaired tissue fixation of resected lung tumors results in decreased IHC staining intensity in some parts of the tumor. This may impact the reliability of IHC analysis.

OBJECTIVES: Programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) is the only approved predictive biomarker for immunotherapy in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). However, predictive PD-L1 immunohistochemistry is subject to interobserver variability. We hypothesized that a pathologist's personality influences the interobserver variability and diagnostic accuracy of PD-L1 immunoscoring.MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventeen pathologists performed PD-L1 immunoscoring on 50 resected NSCLC tumors in three categories (RESULTS: The overall agreement among pathologists for a series of 47 tumors was substantial (kappa = 0.63). Of these, 23/47 (49%) tumors were entirely negative or largely positive, resulting in a kappa value of 0.93. The remaining 24/47 (51%) tumors had a PD-L1 score around the cutoff value, generating a kappa value of 0.32. Pathologists with high scores for conscientiousness (careful, diligent) had the least interobserver variability (r = 0.6, p = 0.009). Also, they showed a trend towards higher sensitivity (74% vs. 68%, p = 0.4), specificity (86% vs. 82%, p = 0.3) and percent agreement (83% vs. 79%, p = 0.3), although not significant. In contrast, pathologists with high scores for neuroticism (sensitive, anxious) had significantly lower specificity (80% vs. 87%, p = 0.03) and percent agreement (78% vs. 85%, p = 0.03). Also, a trend towards high interobserver variability (r = -0.3, p = 0.2) and lower sensitivity (68% vs. 74%, p = 0.3) was observed, although not significant. Pathologists with relatively high scores for conscientiousness scored fewer tumors PD-L1 positive at the ≥ 1% cut-off (r = -0.5, p = 0.03). In contrast, pathologists with relatively high scores for neuroticism score more tumors PD-L1 positive at ≥ 1% (r = 0.6, p = 0.017) and ≥ 50% cut-offs (r = 0.6, p = 0.009).CONCLUSIONS: This study is the first to demonstrate the impact of a pathologist's personality on the interobserver variability and diagnostic accuracy of immunostaining, in the context of PD-L1 in NSCLC. Larger studies are needed for validation of these findings.

Background Advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) harbours many genetic aberrations that can be targeted with systemic treatments. Whole-genome sequencing (WGS) can simultaneously detect these (and possibly new) molecular targets. However, the exact added clinical value of WGS is unknown. Objective The objective of this study was to determine the early cost effectiveness of using WGS in diagnostic strategies compared with currently used molecular diagnostics for patients with inoperable stage IIIB,C/IV non-squamous NSCLC from a Dutch healthcare perspective. Methods A decision tree represented the diagnostic pathway, and a cohort state transition model represented disease progression. Three diagnostic strategies were modelled: standard of care (SoC) alone, WGS as a diagnostic test, and SoC followed by WGS. Treatment effectiveness was based on a systematic review. Probabilistic cost-effectiveness analyses were performed, and threshold analyses (using €80,000 per quality-adjusted life-year [QALY]) was used to explore the early cost effectiveness of WGS. Results WGS as a diagnostic test resulted in more QALYs (0.002) and costs (€1534 [incremental net monetary benefit –€1349]), and SoC followed by WGS resulted in fewer QALYs (–0.002) and more costs (€1059 [–€1194]) compared with SoC alone. WGS as a diagnostic test was only cost effective if it was priced at €2000 per patient and identified 2.7% more actionable patients than SoC alone. Treating these additional identified patients with new treatments costing >€4069 per month decreased the probability of cost effectiveness. Conclusions Our analysis suggests that providing WGS as a diagnostic test is cost effective compared with SoC followed by WGS and SoC alone if costs for WGS decrease and additional patients with actionable targets are identified. This cost-effectiveness model can be used to incorporate new findings iteratively and to support ongoing decision making regarding the use of WGS in this rapidly evolving field. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40273-021-01073-y.

AimsInvestigate the impact of interlaboratory- and interobserver variability of immunohistochemistry on the assessment of programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1) in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).MethodsTwo tissue microarrays (TMAs) were constructed from 50 (TMA-A) and 51 (TMA-B) resected NSCLC cases, and distributed among eight centres. Immunostaining for PD-L1 was performed using Agilent’s 22C3 pharmDx Assay (pharmDx) and/or a 22C3 laboratory developed test (LDT). The interlaboratory variability of staining- and interobserver variability of scoring for PD-L1 were assessed in selected critical samples (samples at the cut-off of positivity) and non-critical samples. Also, PD-L1 epitope deterioration in time in stored unstained slides was analysed. Krippendorff’s alpha values (0=maximal, 1=no variability) were calculated as measure for variability.ResultsFor interlaboratory variability of immunostaining, the percentage of PD-L1 positive cases among centres ranged 40%–51% (1% cut-off) and 23%–30% (50% cut-off). Alpha values at 1% cut-off were 0.88 (pharmDx) and 0.87 (LDT) and at 50% cut-off 0.82 (pharmDx) and 0.95 (LDT). Interobserver variability of scoring resulted in PD-L1 positive cases ranging 29%–55% (1% cut-off) and 14%–30% (50% cut-off) among pathologists. Alpha values were at 1% cut-off 0.83 (TMA-A) and 0.66 (TMA-B), and at 50% cut-off 0.77 (TMA-A) and 0.78 (TMA-B). Interlaboratory variability of staining was higher (pConclusionsThe results provide insight in factors contributing to variability of immunohistochemical assessment of PD-L1, and contribute to more reliable predictive testing for PD-L1.

Background: It is assumed that DNA methylation plays a key role in both tumour development and therapy resistance. Demethylating agents have been shown to be effective in the treatment of haematological malignancies. Based on encouraging preclinical results, demethylating agents may also be effective in solid tumours. This systematic review summarizes the evidence of the effect of demethylating agents on clinical response, methylation and the immune system in solid tumours. Methods: We conducted a systematic literature search from 1949 to December 2016, according to the PRISMA guidelines. Studies which evaluated treatment with azacitidine, decitabine, guadecitabine, hydralazine, procaine, MG98 and/or zebularine in patients with solid tumours were included. Data on clinical response, effects on methylation and immune response were extracted. Results: Fifty-eight studies were included: in 13 studies complete responses (CR) were observed, 35 studies showed partial responses (PR), 47 studies stable disease (SD) and all studies except two showed progressive disease (PD). Effects on global methylation were observed in 11/15 studies and demethylation/ re-expression of tumour specific genes was seen in 15/17 studies. No clear correlation between (de) methylation and clinical response was observed. In 14 studies immune-related responses were reported, such as re-expression of cancer-testis antigens and upregulation of interferon genes. Conclusion: Demethylating agents are able to improve clinical outcome and alter methylation status in patients with solid tumours. Although beneficial effect has been shown in individual patients, overall response is limited. Further research on biomarker predicting therapy efficacy is indicated, particularly in earlier stage and highly methylated tumours. (C) 2017 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an open access article under the CC BY license

Little evidence is available about survival rates in patients with recurrent disease after potentially curative surgery for esophageal or junctional cancer. Only in limited occasions, potentially curative salvage strategies are available. The aim of this study is to analyze survival rates and patterns of dissemination, and to identify independent prognostic factors in a consecutive series of patients who develop recurrent esophageal or junctional cancer. Between 1994 and 2015, patients who developed disease recurrence after neoadjuvant chemo(radio) therapy followed by radical esophagectomy for esophageal or junctional cancer were retrospectively analyzed. The Kaplan-Meier estimates were performed to calculate and compare overall survival between patients with different patterns of dissemination and to compare between different treatment strategies. Furthermore, univariate and multivariate Cox-regression analyses were performed to identify independent prognostic factors for post recurrence survival. In this study, we included 219 patients. The median overall survival of all included patients was 3.2 months (range: 0.0-101.1 months). The median overall survival in patients with exclusively locoregional recurrence (n = 23, 10.8%) was 4.9 months (range: 0.1-55.6) and 2.9 months (range: 0.0-101.1) in patients who had distant metastases (n = 189, 89.2%), P = 0.003. Patients who received treatment aimed at complete tumor eradication (n = 28, 13.7%) had a median overall survival of 13.6 months (range: 1.1-101.1) and palliative treated patients (n = 94, 46.1%) of 4.7 months (range: 0.3-25.6), P

Presentation of all work packages at the TANGO project mini symposium in 2018, includes milestone achievements and preliminary results., The "Technology Assessment of Next Generation Sequencing in Personalized Oncology" (TANGO) project is funded by the ZonMw Personalised Medicine Programme under Dossier number: 846001002 in collaboration with KWF and Zilveren Kruis. The project period is 31 December 2016 – 31 May 2021.

e15024 Background: Recurrent disease (RD) after potentially curative treatment for esophageal or junctional cancer is common and survival after recurrence is poor. Potentially curative strategies are possible in limited occasions and palliative systemic therapy or supportive care are often the only therapies possible. Little is known about survival after recurrence and factors influencing treatment success. We aimed to assess the recurrence patterns and overall survival (OS) of patients who developed RD after curative treatment. Methods: Patients with RD of esophageal or junctional cancer between 1994 and 2014 after potentially curative esophagectomy preceded by neoadjuvant chemo(radio)therapy were included in this retrospective cohort study. A logistic regression analysis was performed to assess predictive factors for receiving treatment aimed at radical tumor eradication. Results: Recurrence was diagnosed in 219 of 503 patients (43.5%). 212 of 219 patients (96.8%) were evaluable for dissemination patter...