Search

This article in the European Journal of Nuclear Medicine & Molecular Imaging discusses the use of PET/CT with [68Ga]Ga-TEoS-DAZA to localize a traumatic biliary leak in a patient who suffered liver lacerations after an accident. The study highlights the potential of hepatobiliary PET tracers in evaluating patients with biliary injuries and emphasizes the dynamic imaging capabilities of PET/CT. The research was funded internally by the Clinic of Nuclear Medicine at Jena University Hospital, and ethical standards were followed with informed consent obtained from the patient. [Extracted from the article]

Simple Summary: This research delves into better treatment options for patients with liver cancer (HCC) who fall outside the eligibility criteria of traditional Milan guidelines for liver transplants. By reviewing patient data from Jena University spanning from 2007 to 2023, the study explores whether new patient classification systems and the use of living donor liver transplantation (LDLT) could extend life-saving options to those previously considered unsuitable. Findings indicate that patients not meeting the Milan criteria still benefit significantly from transplantation, showcasing similar survival rates between those undergoing standard transplants and LDLT. Key factors such as tumour grade and vascular invasion emerged as predictors for cancer recurrence, highlighting the importance of pre-transplant treatments in enhancing survival outcomes. The study underscores LDLT as a feasible alternative, particularly for patients undergoing successful bridging therapies, thereby broadening the scope of liver transplantation for liver cancer and offering new therapeutic approaches for advanced liver tumours. Purpose: This study was designed to elucidate the various new classifications and the use of LDLT and bridging therapy for HCC in this context beyond the Milan criteria (MC). Methods: The clinical data of patients with HCC outside the MC who underwent LT at Jena University between January 2007 and August 2023 were retrospectively analysed. Eligible patients were classified according to various classification systems. Clinicopathological features, overall and disease-free survival rates were compared between LT and LDLT within the context of bridging therapy. The Results: Among the 245 patients analysed, 120 patients did not meet the MC, and 125 patients met the MC. Moreover, there were comparable overall survival rates between patients outside the MC for LT versus LDLT (OS 44.3 months vs. 28.3 months; 5-year survival, 56.4% vs. 40%; p = 0.84). G3 tumour differentiation, the presence of angioinvasion and lack of bridging were statistically significant risk factors for tumour recurrence according to univariate and multivariate analyses (HR 6.34; p = 0.0002; HR 8.21; p < 0.0001; HR 7.50; p = 0.0001). Bridging therapy before transplantation provided a significant survival advantage regardless of the transplant procedure (OS: p = 0.008; DFS: p < 0.001). Conclusions: Patients with HCC outside the MC who underwent LT or LDLT had worse outcomes compared to those of patients who met the MC but still had a survival advantage compared to patients without transplantation. Nevertheless, such patients remain disadvantaged on the waiting list, which is why LDLT represents a safe alternative to LT and should be considered in bridged HCC patients because of differences in tumour differentiation, size and tumour marker dynamics. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Introduction: Induction of liver regeneration represents an option to expand the resectability in patients with expected small future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this cohort‐study is to compare the liver regeneration between different surgical procedures, including novel procedures such as two‐stage living donor liver transplantation using small‐for‐size grafts. Methods: Forty‐three patients with colorectal liver metastases were included between 2004 and 2020. They underwent one of the following three procedures: portal vein embolization (PVE), associated liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and living donor two‐stage liver transplantation (LT). The volume gain of the future liver remnant was analyzed in comparison between the three mentioned procedures. Results: The type of surgery performed had a significant correlation with liver regeneration with a strong effect on the benefit of ALPPS and liver transplantation, respectively (r =.6, p =.00003). The type of surgery was the only independent co‐factor in the multiple regression, which showed a significant influence on FLR‐increase favoring two‐stage transplantation compared to the other two related procedures (ß =.12, T = 3.9, p =.0004). The histological and immunohistochemical studies also showed a clear advantage of proliferation to the benefits of two‐stage liver transplantation compared with ALPPS. Conclusion: Two‐stage liver transplantation using small‐for‐size grafts induces better FLR‐increase than portal vein embolization or ALPPS in patients with colorectal liver metastases. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

We describe the genetic properties of two strains isolated from the elusive bile duct microbiome from solid organ transplant patients. Bacterial strains Enterococcus lactis (MS-STENT-08-E-001) and Klebsiella pneumoniae (MS-STENT-01-M-001) were isolated from the biofilms of bile duct catheters., Competing Interests: The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Sarcopenic obesity impairs the outcome after liver transplantation. The effect of this on liver regeneration has not yet been studied. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential effect of body composition changes on liver volume gain after living donor liver transplantation. We observed liver regeneration in 100 patients who underwent living donor liver transplantation using right lobe grafts (Segments V-VIII). Liver volumetry and body composition analysis were performed based on CT images with special software. The gain of liver volume was calculated between 2 points in time considering the absolute and percentage values: before surgery and early after surgery, with a median time of 10 days. Pearson's correlation and multivariate analysis using stepwise multiple regression were used to examine the potential correlation between body composition and liver volume gain. The liver volume increase was significantly negatively correlated with adipose tissue in the body stem ( r = -0.4, p < 0.001) and positively correlated with psoas mass ( r = 0.24, p = 0.02). These results correspond with those of the multiple regression analysis, which indicated adipose tissue (ß = -1.0, p < 0.001) and psoas mass (ß = 0.12, p < 0.001). The presence of malignancy as an indication for liver transplantation was another significant independent factor negatively affecting liver growth (ß = -13.1, p = 0.046). Sarcopenic obesity predicts an impaired liver volume increase after living donation. This could worsen the postoperative outcome. The role of alimentary interventions and exercises in improving body composition and thus postoperative outcome should be evaluated through prospective interventional studies., (Copyright © 2023 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.)

Background: Extrahepatic body fat could be a relevant factor affecting liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy. The aim of this study was to evaluate the potential role of body fatty tissue in liver regeneration capacity after liver resection in a cohort of living donors., Methods: We observed liver regeneration in 120 patients: 70 living donors who underwent right hepatectomy and 50 recipients who got a right graft transplantation. Liver volumetry and body fat analysis were performed based on the computed tomography images with volumetry software. The gain of liver volume was calculated between three points in time considering the absolute and percentage values: before surgery and early (median 10 days, range 4-21 days) and late (median 27 weeks, range 18-40 weeks) after surgery. Pearson's correlation was used to examine the potential correlation between adipose tissue and liver regeneration., Results: Pearson's correlation showed a significant correlation between the subcutaneous fat mass index (sFMI) and early (r=0.173, P=0.030), as well late (r=0.395, P=0.0004) percental liver volume gain in the whole collective. Under stratification in donor's and recipient's collectives, the effect of extrahepatic adipose tissue appears in multiple regression only in the donor's collective: early (β =0.219, T =2.137, P=0.036) and late (β =0.390, T =2.552, P=0.015) percental volume gain., Conclusions: Subcutaneous adipose tissue is a positive predictive factor to estimate the goodness of liver regeneration after partial hepatectomy in normosthenic donors., Competing Interests: Conflicts of Interest: All authors have completed the ICMJE uniform disclosure form (available at https://hbsn.amegroups.com/article/view/10.21037/hbsn-22-442/coif). The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare., (2023 Hepatobiliary Surgery and Nutrition. All rights reserved.)

Introduction: Induction of liver regeneration represents an option to expand the resectability in patients with expected small future liver remnant (FLR). The aim of this cohort-study is to compare the liver regeneration between different surgical procedures, including novel procedures such as two-stage living donor liver transplantation using small-for-size grafts., Methods: Forty-three patients with colorectal liver metastases were included between 2004 and 2020. They underwent one of the following three procedures: portal vein embolization (PVE), associated liver partition with portal vein ligation for staged hepatectomy (ALPPS), and living donor two-stage liver transplantation (LT). The volume gain of the future liver remnant was analyzed in comparison between the three mentioned procedures., Results: The type of surgery performed had a significant correlation with liver regeneration with a strong effect on the benefit of ALPPS and liver transplantation, respectively (r = .6, p = .00003). The type of surgery was the only independent co-factor in the multiple regression, which showed a significant influence on FLR-increase favoring two-stage transplantation compared to the other two related procedures (ß = .12, T = 3.9, p = .0004). The histological and immunohistochemical studies also showed a clear advantage of proliferation to the benefits of two-stage liver transplantation compared with ALPPS., Conclusion: Two-stage liver transplantation using small-for-size grafts induces better FLR-increase than portal vein embolization or ALPPS in patients with colorectal liver metastases., (© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Sciences published by John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd on behalf of Japanese Society of Hepato-Biliary-Pancreatic Surgery.)