Search

Extrachromosomal DNAs (ecDNAs) are common in cancer, but many questions about their origin, structural dynamics and impact on intratumor heterogeneity are still unresolved. Here we describe single-cell extrachromosomal circular DNA and transcriptome sequencing (scEC&T-seq), a method for parallel sequencing of circular DNAs and full-length mRNA from single cells. By applying scEC&T-seq to cancer cells, we describe intercellular differences in ecDNA content while investigating their structural heterogeneity and transcriptional impact. Oncogene-containing ecDNAs were clonally present in cancer cells and drove intercellular oncogene expression differences. In contrast, other small circular DNAs were exclusive to individual cells, indicating differences in their selection and propagation. Intercellular differences in ecDNA structure pointed to circular recombination as a mechanism of ecDNA evolution. These results demonstrate scEC&T-seq as an approach to systematically characterize both small and large circular DNA in cancer cells, which will facilitate the analysis of these DNA elements in cancer and beyond.

Neuroblastoma is characterised by extensive inter- and intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity and varying clinical outcomes. One possible driver for this heterogeneity are extrachromosomal DNAs (ecDNA), which segregate independently to the daughter cells during cell division and can lead to rapid amplification of oncogenes. While ecDNA-mediated oncogene amplification has been shown to be associated with poor prognosis in many cancer entities, the effects of ecDNA copy number heterogeneity on intermediate phenotypes are still poorly understood.Here, we leverage DNA and RNA sequencing data from the same single cells in cell lines and neuroblastoma patients to investigate these effects. We utilise ecDNA amplicon structures to determine precise ecDNA copy numbers and reveal extensive intercellular ecDNA copy number heterogeneity. We further provide direct evidence for the effects of this heterogeneity on gene expression of cargo genes, includingMYCNand its downstream targets, and the overall transcriptional state of neuroblastoma cells.These results highlight the potential for rapid adaptability of cellular states within a tumour cell population mediated by ecDNA copy number, emphasising the need for ecDNA-specific treatment strategies to tackle tumour formation and adaptation.

Most computational methods that infer somatic copy number alterations (SCNAs) from bulk sequencing of DNA analyse tumour samples individually. However, the sequencing of multiple tumour samples from a patient’s disease is an increasingly common practice. We introduce Refphase, an algorithm that leverages this multi-sampling approach to infer haplotype-specific copy numbers through multi-sample reference phasing. We demonstrate Refphase’s ability to infer haplotype-specific SCNAs and characterise their intra-tumour heterogeneity, to uncover previously undetected allelic imbalance in low purity samples, and to identify parallel evolution in the context of whole genome doubling in a pan-cancer cohort of 336 samples from 99 tumours.

Telomere maintenance in neuroblastoma is linked to poor outcome and caused by either TERT activation or through alternative lengthening of telomeres (ALT). In contrast to TERT activation, commonly caused by genomic rearrangements or MYCN amplification, ALT is less well understood. Alterations at the ATRX locus are key drivers of ALT but only present in ∼50% of ALT tumors.To identify potential new pathways to telomere maintenance, we investigate allele-specific gene dosage effects from whole genomes and transcriptomes in 115 primary neuroblastomas. We show that copy-number dosage deregulates telomere maintenance, genomic stability, and neuronal pathways and identify upregulation of variants of histone H3 and H2A as a potential alternative pathway to ALT. We investigate the interplay between TERT activation, overexpression and copy-number dosage and reveal loss of imprinting at the RTL1 gene associated with poor clinical outcome.These results highlight the importance of gene dosage in key oncogenic mechanisms in neuroblastoma.

The recent outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has led to a worldwide pandemic. One week after initial symptoms develop, a subset of patients progresses to severe disease, with high mortality and limited treatment options. To design novel interventions aimed at preventing spread of the virus and reducing progression to severe disease, detailed knowledge of the cell types and regulating factors driving cellular entry is urgently needed. Here we assess the expression patterns in genes required for COVID-19 entry into cells and replication, and their regulation by genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors, throughout the respiratory tract using samples collected from the upper (nasal) and lower airways (bronchi). Matched samples from the upper and lower airways show a clear increased expression of these genes in the nose compared to the bronchi and parenchyma. Cellular deconvolution indicates a clear association of these genes with the proportion of secretory epithelial cells. Smoking status was found to increase the majority of COVID-19 related genes including ACE2 and TMPRSS2 but only in the lower airways, which was associated with a significant increase in the predicted proportion of goblet cells in bronchial samples of current smokers. Both acute and second hand smoke were found to increase ACE2 expression in the bronchus. Inhaled corticosteroids decrease ACE2 expression in the lower airways. No significant effect of genetics on ACE2 expression was observed, but a strong association of DNA- methylation with ACE2 and TMPRSS2- mRNA expression was identified in the bronchus.

Extrachromosomal circularization of DNA is an important genomic feature in cancer. The structure, composition and genome-wide frequency of extrachromosomal circular DNA, however, have not yet been extensively profiled. Here, we combined genomic and transcriptomic approaches to describe the landscape of extrachromosomal circular DNA in neuroblastoma, a tumor arising in childhood from primitive cells of the sympathetic nervous system. Our analysis identifies and characterizes a wide catalog of somatically acquired and undescribed extrachromosomal circular DNAs. Moreover, we find that extrachromosomal circular DNAs are an unanticipated major source of somatic rearrangements, contributing to oncogenic remodeling through chimeric circularization and reintegration of circular DNA into the linear genome. Cancer-causing lesions can emerge out of circle-derived rearrangements and are associated with adverse clinical outcome. It is highly probable that circle-derived rearrangements represent an ongoing mutagenic process. Thus, extrachromosomal circular DNAs represent a multi-hit mutagenic process, with important functional and clinical implications for the origins of genomic remodeling in cancer.

Lung cancer is the leading cause of cancer-related death in the world. In contrast to many other cancers, a direct connection to modifiable lifestyle risk in the form of tobacco smoke has long been established. More than 50% of all smoking-related lung cancers occur in former smokers, often many years after smoking cessation. Despite extensive research, the molecular processes for persistent lung cancer risk are unclear.To examine whether risk stratification in the clinic and in the general population can be improved upon by the addition of genetic data, and to explore the mechanisms of the persisting risk in former smokers, we have analysed transcriptomic data from accessible airway tissues of 487 subjects, including healthy volunteers and clinic patients of different smoking status. We developed a model to assess smoking associated gene expression changes and their reversibility after smoking is stopped, comparing healthy subjects to clinic patients with and without lung cancer. We find persistent smoking-associated immune alterations to be a hallmark of the clinic patients. Integrating previous GWAS data using a transcriptional network approach, we demonstrate that the same immune and interferon related pathways are strongly enriched for genes linked to known genetic risk factors, demonstrating a causal relationship between immune alteration and lung cancer risk. Finally, we used accessible airway transcriptomic data to derive a non-invasive lung cancer risk classifier.Our results provide initial evidence for germline-mediated personalised smoke injury response and risk in the general population, with potential implications for managing long-term lung cancer incidence and mortality.

MotivationGenome Architecture Mapping (GAM) was recently introduced as a digestion- and ligation-free method to detect chromatin conformation. Orthogonal to existing approaches based on chromatin conformation capture (3C), GAM’s ability to capture both inter- and intra-chromosomal contacts from low amounts of input data makes it particularly well suited for allele-specific analyses in a clinical setting. Allele-specific analyses are powerful tools to investigate the effects of genetic variants on many cellular phenotypes including chromatin conformation, but require the haplotypes of the individuals under study to be known a-priori. So far however, no algorithm exists for haplotype reconstruction and phasing of genetic variants from GAM data, hindering the allele-specific analysis of chromatin contact points in non-model organisms or individuals with unknown haplotypes.ResultsWe present GAMIBHEAR, a tool for accurate haplotype reconstruction from GAM data. GAMIBHEAR aggregates allelic co-observation frequencies from GAM data and employs a GAM-specific probabilistic model of haplotype capture to optimise phasing accuracy. Using a hybrid mouse embryonic stem cell line with known haplotype structure as a benchmark dataset, we assess correctness and completeness of the reconstructed haplotypes, and demonstrate the power of GAMIBHEAR to infer accurate genome-wide haplotypes from GAM data.AvailabilityGAMIBHEAR is available as an R package under the open source GPL-2 license athttps://bitbucket.org/schwarzlab/gamibhearMaintainer:julia.markowski@mdc-berlin.de

Intra-tumour heterogeneity is a key characteristic of tumours and poses significant clinical challenges. Despite extensive research, the evolutionary processes shaping cancer genomes are not yet fully understood. We here discuss two conflicting theories about the evolution of solid tumours: the Big Bang model and the classical model of continuous evolution. Using chromosomal instability we shed light on the preferred mode of cancer evolution and its implications for personalised treatment.

Extrachromosomal DNA circularization is a common event in cancer cells and frequently serves as a vehicle for cancer oncogene amplification. Random segregation of oncogene-containing extrachromosomal circular DNA promotes rapid intercellular heterogeneity, conferring tumors the ability to rapidly evolve and escape therapy. Smaller, copy-number neutral extrachromosomal circular DNAs are also abundantly identified in both healthy and malignant tissues, but their function in cancer is still unknown. Understanding how extrachromosomal circular DNAs contribute to intercellular heterogeneity in cancer cells remains crucial, however methods for an unbiased characterization of extrachromosomal circular DNAs in single cells are lacking. We introduce scEC&T-seq (single cell extrachromosomal circular DNA and transcriptomic sequencing), a method for parallel detection of extrachromosomal circular DNAs and full-length mRNA in single cells. We demonstrate the ability of our method to isolate and detect extrachromosomal circular DNAs genome-wide from all range of sizes in single cells. We observed that whereas large oncogene-containing circular DNAs are clonally present in most cancer cells, only a very small fraction of small circular DNAs are recurrently identified in single cells, indicating yet unknown prerequisites for maintenance and propagation. Our method was able to capture and recapitulate the structural complexity of oncogene-containing extrachromosomal circular DNAs in single cells, and the matching transcriptomic data allowed us to identify fusion transcripts resulting from the rearranged extrachromosomal structures. In addition, we observed that whereas the main structure of extrachromosomal circular DNAs is mostly stable in single cells, intercellular differences in extrachromosomal circular DNAs’ content can drive differences in oncogene transcription levels in single cells. We envision that by integrating extrachromosomal circular DNA and mRNA sequencing, our method will not only be useful to investigate the impact of intercellular heterogeneity in extrachromosomal circular DNA in tumor evolution, but also to interrogate its function in other biological and pathological processes. Citation Format: Rocio Chamorro Gonzalez, Thomas Conrad, Robin Xu, Madalina Giurgiu, Maja Cwikla, Katharina Kasack, Lotte Brückner, Eric van Leen, Elias Rodriguez-Fos, Konstantin Helmsauer, Heathcliff Dorado Garcia, Yi Bei, Karin Schmelz, Sascha Sauer, Angelika Eggert, Johannes H. Schulte, Roland F. Schwarz, Kerstin Haase, Richard P. Koche, Anton G. Henssen. Dissecting intercellular extrachromosomal circular DNA heterogeneity in single cancer cells with scEC&T-seq [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1693.

BackgroundThe recent outbreak of the severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2), which causes coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19), has led to a worldwide pandemic. A subset of COVID-19 patients progresses to severe disease, with high mortality and limited treatment options. Detailed knowledge of the expression regulation of genes required for viral entry into respiratory epithelial cells is urgently needed.MethodsHere we assess the expression patterns of genes required for SARS-CoV-2 entry into cells, and their regulation by genetic, epigenetic and environmental factors, throughout the respiratory tract using samples collected from the upper (nasal) and lower airways (bronchi).FindingsGenes encoding viral receptors and activating protease are increased in the nose compared to the bronchi in matched samples and associated with the proportion of secretory epithelial cells in cellular deconvolution analyses. Current or ex-smoking was found to increase expression of these genes only in lower airways, which was associated with a significant increase in the predicted proportion of goblet cells. Both acute and second hand smoke exposure were found to increase ACE2 expression while inhaled corticosteroids decrease ACE2 expression in the lower airways. A strong association of DNA- methylation with ACE2 and TMPRSS2- mRNA expression was identified.InterpretationGenes associated with SARS-CoV-2 viral entry into cells are high in upper airways, but strongly increased in lower airways by smoke exposure. In contrast, ICS decreases ACE2 expression, indicating that inhaled corticosteroids are unlikely to increase the risk for more severe COVID-19 disease.FundingThis work was supported by a Seed Network grant from the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative to M.C.N. and by the European Union’s H2020 Research and Innovation Program under grant agreement no. 874656 (discovAIR) to M.C.N. U BIOPRED was supported by an Innovative Medicines Initiative Joint Undertaking (No. 115010), resources from the European Union’s Seventh Framework Programme (FP7/2007-2013) and EFPIA companies’ in kind contribution (www.imi.europa.eu). Longfonds Junior Fellowship. We acknowledge the contribution of the whole U-BIOPRED team as listed in the Appendix S1.’ SDB, FM and RFS would like to thank the Helmholtz Association, Germany, for support.” NIH K08HL146943; Parker B. Francis Fellowship; ATS Foundation/Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. Research Fellowship in IPF. RCR is part funded by Cancer Research UK Cambridge Centre and the Cambridge NIHR Biomedical Research Centre. BAP was funded by programme support from Cancer Research UK. The CRUKPAP Study was supported by the CRUK Cambridge Cancer Centre, by the NIHR Cambridge Biomedical Research Centre and by the Cambridge Bioresource. PIAMA was supported by The Netherlands Organization for Health Research and Development; The Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research; The Netherlands Lung Foundation (with methylation studies supported by AF 4.1.14.001); The Netherlands Ministry of Spatial Planning, Housing, and the Environment; and The Netherlands Ministry of Health, Welfare, and Sport. Dr. Qi is supported by a grant from the China Scholarship Council.

Transcript alterations often result from somatic changes in cancer genomes1. Various forms of RNA alterations have been described in cancer, including overexpression2, altered splicing3 and gene fusions4; however, it is difficult to attribute these to underlying genomic changes owing to heterogeneity among patients and tumour types, and the relatively small cohorts of patients for whom samples have been analysed by both transcriptome and whole-genome sequencing. Here we present, to our knowledge, the most comprehensive catalogue of cancer-associated gene alterations to date, obtained by characterizing tumour transcriptomes from 1,188 donors of the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) and The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)5. Using matched whole-genome sequencing data, we associated several categories of RNA alterations with germline and somatic DNA alterations, and identified probable genetic mechanisms. Somatic copy-number alterations were the major drivers of variations in total gene and allele-specific expression. We identified 649 associations of somatic single-nucleotide variants with gene expression in cis, of which 68.4% involved associations with flanking non-coding regions of the gene. We found 1,900 splicing alterations associated with somatic mutations, including the formation of exons within introns in proximity to Alu elements. In addition, 82% of gene fusions were associated with structural variants, including 75 of a new class, termed ‘bridged’ fusions, in which a third genomic location bridges two genes. We observed transcriptomic alteration signatures that differ between cancer types and have associations with variations in DNA mutational signatures. This compendium of RNA alterations in the genomic context provides a rich resource for identifying genes and mechanisms that are functionally implicated in cancer., Integrative analyses of transcriptome and whole-genome sequencing data for 1,188 tumours across 27 types of cancer are used to provide a comprehensive catalogue of RNA-level alterations in cancer.

In colorectal cancer, oncogenic mutations transform a hierarchically organized and homeostatic epithelium into invasive cancer tissue lacking visible organization. We sought to define colorectal cancer cell types and signals controlling their development. More than 30,000 epithelial single cell transcriptomes of tumors and matched non-cancerous tissues of twelve colorectal cancer patients were clustered into six patient-overarching groups defined by differential activities of oncogenic signaling pathways such as mitogen-activated protein kinase and oncogenic traits such as replication stress. RNA metabolic labeling and assessment of RNA velocity in patient-derived organoids revealed developmental trajectories of colorectal cancer cells organized along a mitogen-activated protein kinase activity gradient. This was in contrast to normal colon organoid cells developing along graded Wnt activity. Experimental targeting of EGFR-BRAF-MEK in cancer organoids affected signaling and gene expression contingent on predictive KRAS/BRAF mutations and induced cell plasticity overriding default developmental trajectories, providing a basis for non-genetic resistance to targeted therapies.

MC3 Working Group: Rehan Akbani21, Pavana Anur22, Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Alex Buchanan9, Kami Chiotti9, Kyle Covington12,23, Allison Creason9, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Kyle Ellrott9, Yu Fan21, Steven Foltz1,2, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Walker Hale12, David Haussler24,25, Julian M. Hess8,26, Carolyn M. Hutter27, Cyriac Kandoth28, Katayoon Kasaian29,30, Melpomeni Kasapi27, Dave Larson1 , Ignaty Leshchiner8, John Letaw31, Singer Ma32, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, Yifei Men32, Gordon B. Mills33,34, Beifang Niu35, Myron Peto22, Amie Radenbaugh24, Sheila M. Reynolds36, Gordon Saksena8, Heidi Sofia27, Chip Stewart8, Adam J. Struck31, Joshua M. Stuart24,37, Wenyi Wang21, John N. Weinstein38, David A. Wheeler12,13, Christopher K. Wong24,39, Liu Xi12 & Kai Ye40,41 21Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 22Molecular and Medical Genetics, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 23Castle Biosciences Inc, Friendswood, TX 77546, USA. 24UC Santa Cruz Genomics Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 25Howard Hughes Medical Institute, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 26Massachusetts General Hospital Center for Cancer Research, Charlestown, MA 02114, USA. 27National Human Genome Research Institute, National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, MD 20894, USA. 28Marie-Josée and Henry R. Kravis Center for Molecular Oncology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY 10065, USA. 29Ontario Institute for Cancer Research, Toronto, ON M5G 0A3, Canada. 30Canada’s Michael Smith Genome Sciences Centre, BC Cancer, Vancouver, BC V5Z 4S6, Canada. 31Computational Biology Program, School of Medicine, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 32DNAnexus Inc, Mountain View, CA 94040, USA. 33Department of Systems Biology, UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 34Precision Oncology, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Oregon Health and Science University, Portland, OR 97239, USA. 35Computer Network Information Center, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China. 36Institute for Systems Biology, Seattle, WA 98109, USA. 37Department of Biomolecular Engineering, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 38Department of Bioinformatics and Computational Biology and Department of Systems Biology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA. 39Biomolecular Engineering Department, University of California Santa Cruz, Santa Cruz, CA 95064, USA. 40School of Elect, PCAWG novel somatic mutation calling methods working group: Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Beifang Niu35, Matthias Bieg42,43, Paul C. Boutros6,44,45,46, Ivo Buchhalter43,47,48, Adam P. Butler49, Ken Chen50, Zechen Chong51, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Oliver Drechsel52,53, Lewis Jonathan Dursi6,7, Roland Eils47,48,54,55, Kyle Ellrott9, Shadrielle M. G. Espiritu6, Yu Fan21, Robert S. Fulton1,3,20, Shengjie Gao56, Josep L. l. Gelpi57,58, Mark B. Gerstein5,18,19, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Santiago Gonzalez59,60, Ivo G. Gut52,61, Faraz Hach62,63, Michael C. Heinold47,48, Julian M. Hess8,26, Jonathan Hinton49, Taobo Hu64, Vincent Huang6, Yi Huang65,66, Barbara Hutter43,67,68, David R. Jones49, Jongsun Jung69, Natalie Jäger47, Hyung-Lae Kim70, Kortine Kleinheinz47,48, Sushant Kumar5,19, Yogesh Kumar64, Christopher M. Lalansingh6, Ignaty Leshchiner8, Ivica Letunic71, Dimitri Livitz8, Eric Z. Ma64, Yosef E. Maruvka8,26,72, R. Jay Mashl1,2, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, Andrew Menzies49, Ana Milovanovic57, Morten Muhlig Nielsen73, Stephan Ossowski52,53,74, Nagarajan Paramasivam43,47, Jakob Skou Pedersen73,75, Marc D. Perry76,77, Montserrat Puiggròs57, Keiran M. Raine49, Esther Rheinbay8,14,72, Romina Royo57, S. Cenk Sahinalp62,78,79, Gordon Saksena8, Iman Sarrafi62,78, Matthias Schlesner47,80, Jared T. Simpson6,17, Lucy Stebbings49, Chip Stewart8, Miranda D. Stobbe52,61, Jon W. Teague49, Grace Tiao8, David Torrents57,81, Jeremiah A. Wala8,14,82, Jiayin Wang1,40,66, Wenyi Wang21, Sebastian M. Waszak60, Joachim Weischenfeldt60,83,84, Michael C. Wendl1,10,11, Johannes Werner47,85, Zhenggang Wu64, Hong Xue64, Sergei Yakneen60, Takafumi N. Yamaguchi6, Kai Ye40,41, Venkata D. Yellapantula20,86, Christina K. Yung76 & Junjun Zhang76, PCAWG Consortium: Lauri A. Aaltonen87, Federico Abascal49, Adam Abeshouse88, Hiroyuki Aburatani89, David J. Adams49, Nishant Agrawal90, Keun Soo Ahn91, Sung-Min Ahn92, Hiroshi Aikata93, Rehan Akbani21, Kadir C. Akdemir50, Hikmat Al-Ahmadie88, Sultan T. Al-Sedairy94, Fatima Al-Shahrour95, Malik Alawi96,97, Monique Albert98, Kenneth Aldape99,100, Ludmil B. Alexandrov49,101,102, Adrian Ally30, Kathryn Alsop103, Eva G. Alvarez104,105,106, Fernanda Amary107, Samirkumar B. Amin108,109,110, Brice Aminou76, Ole Ammerpohl111,112, Matthew J. Anderson113, Yeng Ang114, Davide Antonello115, Pavana Anur22, Samuel Aparicio116, Elizabeth L. Appelbaum1,117, Yasuhito Arai118, Axel Aretz119, Koji Arihiro93, Shun-ichi Ariizumi120, Joshua Armenia121, Laurent Arnould122, Sylvia Asa123,124, Yassen Assenov125, Gurnit Atwal6,126,127, Sietse Aukema112,128, J. Todd Auman129, Miriam R. Aure130, Philip Awadalla6,126, Marta Aymerich131, Gary D. Bader126, Adrian Baez-Ortega132, Matthew H. Bailey1,2,3, Peter J. Bailey133, Miruna Balasundaram30, Saianand Balu134, Pratiti Bandopadhayay8,135,136, Rosamonde E. Banks137, Stefano Barbi138, Andrew P. Barbour139,140, Jonathan Barenboim6, Jill Barnholtz-Sloan141,142, Hugh Barr143, Elisabet Barrera59, John Bartlett98,144, Javier Bartolome57, Claudio Bassi115, Oliver F. Bathe145,146, Daniel Baumhoer147, Prashant Bavi148, Stephen B. Baylin149,150, Wojciech Bazant59, Duncan Beardsmore151, Timothy A. Beck152,153, Sam Behjati49, Andreas Behren154, Beifang Niu35, Cindy Bell155, Sergi Beltran52,61, Christopher Benz156, Andrew Berchuck157, Anke K. Bergmann158, Erik N. Bergstrom101,102, Benjamin P. Berman159,160,161, Daniel M. Berney162, Stephan H. Bernhart163,164,165, Rameen Beroukhim8,14,82, Mario Berrios166, Samantha Bersani167, Johanna Bertl73,168, Miguel Betancourt169, Vinayak Bhandari6,44, Shriram G. Bhosle49, Andrew V. Biankin133,170,171,172, Matthias Bieg42,43, Darell Bigner173, Hans Binder163,164, Ewan Birney59, Michael Birrer72, Nidhan K. Biswas174, Bodil Bjerkehagen147,175, Tom Bodenheimer134, Lori Boice176, Giada Bonizzato177, Johann S. De Bono178, Arnoud Boot179,180, Moiz S. Bootwalla166, Ake Borg181, Arndt Borkhardt182, Keith A. Boroevich183,184, Ivan Borozan6, Christoph Borst185, Marcus Bosenberg186, Mattia Bosio52,53,57, Jacqueline Boultwood187, Guillaume Bourque188,189, Paul C. Boutros6,44,45,46, G. Steven Bova190, David T. Bowen49,191, Reanne Bowlby30, David D. L. Bowtell103, Sandrine Boyault192, Rich Boyce59, Jeffrey Boyd193, Alvis Brazma59, Paul Brennan194, Daniel S. Brewer195,196, Arie B. Brinkman197, Robert G. Bristow44,198,199,200,201, Russell R. Broaddus99, Jane E. Brock202, Malcolm Brock203, Annegien Broeks204, Angela N. Brooks8,24,37,82, Denise Brooks30, Benedikt Brors67,205,206, Søren Brunak207,208, Timothy J. C. Bruxner113,209, Alicia L. Bruzos104,105,106, Alex Buchanan9, Ivo Buchhalter43,47,48, Christiane Buchholz210, Susan Bullman8,82, Hazel Burke211, Birgit Burkhardt212, Kathleen H. Burns213,214, John Busanovich8,215, Carlos D. Bustamante216,217, Adam P. Butler49, Atul J. Butte218, Niall J. Byrne76, Anne-Lise Børresen-Dale130,219, Samantha J. Caesar-Johnson220, Andy Cafferkey59, Declan Cahill221, Claudia Calabrese59,60, Carlos Caldas222,223, Fabien Calvo224, Niedzica Camacho178, Peter J. Campbell49,225, Elias Campo226,227, Cinzia Cantù177, Shaolong Cao21, Thomas E. Carey228, Joana Carlevaro-Fita229,230,231, Rebecca Carlsen30, Ivana Cataldo167,177, Mario Cazzola232, Jonathan Cebon154, Robert Cerfolio233, Dianne E. Chadwick234, Dimple Chakravarty235, Don Chalmers236, Calvin Wing Yiu Chan47,237, Kin Chan238, Michelle Chan-Seng-Yue148, Vishal S. Chandan239, David K. Chang133,170, Stephen J. Chanock240, Lorraine A. Chantrill170,241, Aurélien Chateigner76,242, Nilanjan Chatterjee149,243, Kazuaki Chayama93, Hsiao-Wei Chen114,121, Jieming Chen218, Ken Chen50, Yiwen Chen21, Zhaohong Chen244, Andrew D. Cherniack8,82, Jeremy Chien245, Yoke-Eng Chiew246,247, Suet-Feung Chin222,223, Juok Cho8, Sunghoon Cho248, Jung Kyoon Choi249, Wan Choi250, Christine Chomienne251, Zechen Chong51, Su Pin Choo252, Angela Chou170,246, Angelika N. Christ113, Elizabeth L. Christie103, Eric Chuah30, Carrie Cibulskis8, Kristian Cibulskis8, Sara Cingarlini253, Peter Clapham49, Alexander Claviez254, Sean Cleary148,255, Nicole Cloonan256, Marek Cmero257,258,259, Colin C. Collins62, Ashton A. Connor255,260, Susanna L. Cooke133, Colin S. Cooper178,196,261, Leslie Cope149, Vincenzo Corbo138,177, Matthew G. Cordes1,262, Stephen M. Cordner263, Isidro Cortés-Ciriano264,265,266, Kyle Covington12,23, Prue A. Cowin267, Brian Craft24, David Craft8,268, Chad J. Creighton269, Yupeng Cun270, Erin Curley271, Ioana Cutcutache179,180, Karolina Czajka272, Bogdan Czerniak99,273, Rebecca A. Dagg274, Ludmila Danilova149, Maria Vittoria Davi275, Natalie R. Davidson276,277,278,279,280, Helen Davies49,281,282, Ian J. Davis283, Brandi N. Davis-Dusenbery284, Kevin J. Dawson49, Francisco M. De La Vega216,217,285, Ricardo De Paoli-Iseppi211, Timothy Defreitas8, Angelo P. Dei Tos286, Olivier Delaneau287,288,289, John A. Demchok220, Jonas Demeulemeester290,291, German M. Demidov52,53,74, Deniz Demircioğlu292,293, Nening M. Dennis221, Robert E. Denroche148, Stefan C. Dentro49,290,294, Nikita Desai76, Vikram Deshpande72, Amit G. Deshwar295, Christine Desmedt296,297, Jordi Deu-Pons298,299, Noreen Dhalla30, Neesha C. Dhani300, Priyanka Dhingra301,302, Rajiv Dhir303, Anthony DiBiase304, Klev Diamanti305, Li Ding1,2,3,20, Shuai Ding306, Huy Q. Dinh159, Luc Dirix307, HarshaVardhan Doddapaneni12, Nilgun Donmez62,78, Michelle T. Dow244, Ronny Drapkin308, Oliver Drechsel52,53, Ruben M. Drews223, Serge Serge49, Tim Dudderidge150,221, Ana Dueso-Barroso57, Andrew J. Dunford8, Michael Dunn309, Lewis Jonathan Dursi6,7, Fraser R. Duthie133,310, Ken Dutton-Regester311, Jenna Eagles272, Douglas F. Easton312,313, Stuart Edmonds314, Paul A. Edwards223,315, Sandra E. Edwards178, Rosalind A. Eeles178,221, Anna Ehinger316, Juergen Eils54,55, Roland Eils47,48,54,55, Adel El-Naggar99,273, Matthew Eldridge223, Kyle Ellrott9, Serap Erkek60, Georgia Escaramis53,317,318, Shadrielle M. G. Espiritu6, Xavier Estivill53,319, Dariush Etemadmoghadam103, Jorunn E. Eyfjord320, Bishoy M. Faltas280, Daiming Fan321, Yu Fan21, William C. Faquin72, Claudiu Farcas244, Matteo Fassan322, Aquila Fatima323, Francesco Favero324, Nodirjon Fayzullaev76, Ina Felau220, Sian Fereday103, Martin L. Ferguson325, Vincent Ferretti76,326, Lars Feuerbach205, Matthew A. Field327, J. Lynn Fink57,113, Gaetano Finocchiaro328, Cyril Fisher221, Matthew W. Fittall290, Anna Fitzgerald329, Rebecca C. Fitzgerald282, Adrienne M. Flanagan330, Neil E. Fleshner331, Paul Flicek59, John A. Foekens332, Kwun M. Fong333, Nuno A. Fonseca59,334, Christopher S. Foster335,336, Natalie S. Fox6, Michael Fraser6, Scott Frazer8, Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern337, William Friedman338, Joan Frigola298, Catrina C. Fronick1,262, Akihiro Fujimoto184, Masashi Fujita184, Masashi Fukayama339, Lucinda A. Fulton1 , Robert S. Fulton1,3,20, Mayuko Furuta184, P. Andrew Futreal340, Anja Füllgrabe59, Stacey B. Gabriel8, Steven Gallinger148,255,260, Carlo Gambacorti-Passerini341, Jianjiong Gao121, Shengjie Gao56, Levi Garraway82, Øystein Garred342, Erik Garrison49, Dale W. Garsed103, Nils Gehlenborg8,343, Josep L. l. Gelpi57,58, Joshy George110, Daniela S. Gerhard344, Clarissa Gerhauser345, Jeffrey E. Gershenwald346,347, Mark B. Gerstein5,18,19, Moritz Gerstung59,60, Gad Getz8,14,15,16, Mohammed Ghori49, Ronald Ghossein348, Nasra H. Giama349, Richard A. Gibbs12, Anthony J. Gill170,350, Pelvender Gill351, Dilip D. Giri348, Dominik Glodzik49, Vincent J. Gnanapragasam352,353, Maria Elisabeth Goebler354, Mary J. Goldman24, Carmen Gomez355, Santiago Gonzalez59,60, Abel Gonzalez-Perez298,299,356, Dmitry A. Gordenin357, James Gossage358, Kunihito Gotoh359, Ramaswamy Govindan3, Dorthe Grabau360, Janet S. Graham133,361, Robert C. Grant148,260, Anthony R. Green315, Eric Green27, Liliana Greger59, Nicola Grehan282, Sonia Grimaldi177, Sean M. Grimmond362, Robert L. Grossman363, Adam Grundhoff97,364, Gunes Gundem88, Qianyun Guo75, Manaswi Gupta8, Shailja Gupta365, Ivo G. Gut52,61, Marta Gut52,61, Jonathan Göke292,366, Gavin Ha8, Andrea Haake111, David Haan37, Siegfried Haas185, Kerstin Haase290, James E. Haber367, Nina Habermann60, Faraz Hach62,63, Syed Haider6, Natsuko Hama118, Freddie C. Hamdy351, Anne Hamilton267, Mark P. Hamilton368, Leng Han369, George B. Hanna370, Martin Hansmann371, Nicholas J. Haradhvala8,72, Olivier Harismendy102,372, Ivon Harliwong113, Arif O. Harmanci5,373, Eoghan Harrington374, Takanori Hasegawa375, David Haussler24,25, Steve Hawkins223, Shinya Hayami376, Shuto Hayashi375, D. Neil Hayes134,377,378, Stephen J. Hayes379,380, Nicholas K. Hayward211,311, Steven Hazell221, Yao He381, Allison P. Heath382, Simon C. Heath52,61, David Hedley300, Apurva M. Hegde38, David I. Heiman8, Michael C. Heinold47,48, Zachary Heins88, Lawrence E. Heisler152, Eva Hellstrom-Lindberg383, Mohamed Helmy384, Seong Gu Heo385, Austin J. Hepperla134, José María Heredia-Genestar386, Carl Herrmann47,48,387, Peter Hersey211, Julian M. Hess8,26, Holmfridur Hilmarsdottir320, Jonathan Hinton49, Satoshi Hirano388, Nobuyoshi Hiraoka389, Katherine A. Hoadley134,390, Asger Hobolth75,168, Ermin Hodzic78, Jessica I. Hoell182, Steve Hoffmann163,164,165,391, Oliver Hofmann392, Andrea Holbrook166, Aliaksei Z. Holik53, Michael A. Hollingsworth393, Oliver Holmes209,311, Robert A. Holt30, Chen Hong205,237, Eun Pyo Hong385, Jongwhi H. Hong394, Gerrit K. Hooijer395, Henrik Hornshøj73, Fumie Hosoda118, Yong Hou56,396, Volker Hovestadt397, William Howat352, Alan P. Hoyle134, Ralph H. Hruban149, Jianhong Hu12, Taobo Hu64, Xing Hua240, Kuan-lin Huang1,398, Mei Huang176, Mi Ni Huang179,180, Vincent Huang6, Yi Huang65,66, Wolfgang Huber60, Thomas J. Hudson272,399, Michael Hummel400, Jillian A. Hung246,247, David Huntsman401, Ted R. Hupp402, Jason Huse88, Matthew R. Huska403, Barbara Hutter43,67,68, Carolyn M. Hutter27, Daniel Hübschmann48,54,404,405,406, Christine A. Iacobuzio-Donahue348, Charles David Imbusch205, Marcin Imielinski407,408, Seiya Imoto375, William B. Isaacs409, Keren Isaev6,44, Shumpei Ishikawa410, Murat Iskar397, S. M. Ashiqul Islam244, Michael Ittmann411,412,413, Sinisa Ivkovic284, Jose M. G. Izarzugaza414, Jocelyne Jacquemier415, Valerie Jakrot211, Nigel B. Jamieson133,172,416, Gun Ho Jang148, Se Jin Jang417, Joy C. Jayaseelan12, Reyka Jayasinghe1 , Stuart R. Jefferys134, Karine Jegalian418, Jennifer L. Jennings419, Seung-Hyup Jeon250, Lara Jerman60,420, Yuan Ji421,422, Wei Jiao6, Peter A. Johansson311, Amber L. Johns170, Jeremy Johns272, Rory Johnson230,423, Todd A. Johnson183, Clemency Jolly290, Yann Joly424, Jon G. Jonasson320, Corbin D. Jones425, David R. Jones49, David T. W. Jones426,427, Nic Jones428, Steven J. M. Jones30, Jos Jonkers204, Young Seok Ju49,249, Hartmut Juhl429, Jongsun Jung69, Malene Juul73, Randi Istrup Juul73, Sissel Juul374, Natalie Jäger47, Rolf Kabbe47, Andre Kahles276,277,278,279,430, Abdullah Kahraman431,432,433, Vera B. Kaiser434, Hojabr Kakavand211, Sangeetha Kalimuthu148, Christof von Kalle405, Koo Jeong Kang91, Katalin Karaszi351, Beth Karlan435, Rosa Karlić436, Dennis Karsch437, Katayoon Kasaian29,30, Karin S. Kassahn113,438, Hitoshi Katai439, Mamoru Kato440, Hiroto Katoh410, Yoshiiku Kawakami93, Jonathan D. Kay117, Stephen H. Kazakoff209,311, Marat D. Kazanov441,442,443, Maria Keays59, Electron Kebebew444,445, Richard F. Kefford446, Manolis Kellis8,447, James G. Kench170,350,448, Catherine J. Kennedy246,247, Jules N. A. Kerssemakers47, David Khoo273, Vincent Khoo221, Narong Khuntikeo115,449, Ekta Khurana301,302,450,451, Helena Kilpinen117, Hark Kyun Kim452, Hyung-Lae Kim70, Hyung-Yong Kim415, Hyunghwan Kim250, Jaegil Kim8, Jihoon Kim453, Jong K. Kim454, Youngwook Kim455,456, Tari A. King457,458,459, Wolfram Klapper128, Kortine Kleinheinz47,48, Leszek J. Klimczak460, Stian Knappskog49,461, Michael Kneba437, Bartha M. Knoppers424, Youngil Koh462,463, Jan Komorowski305,464, Daisuke Komura410, Mitsuhiro Komura375, Gu Kong415, Marcel Kool426,465, Jan O. Korbel59,60, Viktoriya Korchina12, Andrey Korshunov465, Michael Koscher465, Roelof Koster466, Zsofia Kote-Jarai178, Antonios Koures244, Milena Kovacevic284, Barbara Kremeyer49, Helene Kretzmer164,165, Markus Kreuz467, Savitri Krishnamurthy99,468, Dieter Kube469, Kiran Kumar8, Pardeep Kumar221, Sushant Kumar5,19, Yogesh Kumar64, Ritika Kundra114,121, Kirsten Kübler8,14,72, Ralf Küppers470, Jesper Lagergren383,471, Phillip H. Lai166, Peter W. Laird472, Sunil R. Lakhani473, Christopher M. Lalansingh6, Emilie Lalonde6, Fabien C. Lamaze6, Adam Lambert351, Eric Lander8, Pablo Landgraf474,475, Luca Landoni115, Anita Langerød130, Andrés Lanzós230,231,423, Denis Larsimont476, Erik Larsson477, Mark Lathrop189, Loretta M. S. Lau478, Chris Lawerenz55, Rita T. Lawlor177, Michael S. Lawrence8,72,183, Alexander J. Lazar99,108, Xuan Le479, Darlene Lee30, Donghoon Lee5, Eunjung Alice Lee480, Hee Jin Lee417, Jake June-Koo Lee264,266, Jeong-Yeon Lee481, Juhee Lee482, Ming Ta Michael Lee340, Henry Lee-Six49, Kjong-Van Lehmann276,277,278,279,430, Hans Lehrach483, Dido Lenze400, Conrad R. Leonard209,311, Daniel A. Leongamornlert49,178, Ignaty Leshchiner8, Louis Letourneau484, Ivica Letunic71, Douglas A. Levine88,485, Lora Lewis12, Tim Ley486, Chang Li56,396, Constance H. Li6,44, Haiyan Irene Li30, Jun Li21, Lin Li56, Shantao Li5, Siliang Li56,396, Xiaobo Li56,396, Xiaotong Li5, Xinyue Li56, Yilong Li49, Han Liang21, Sheng-Ben Liang234, Peter Lichter68,397, Pei Lin8, Ziao Lin8,487, W. M. Linehan488, Ole Christian Lingjærde489, Dongbing Liu56,396, Eric Minwei Liu88,301,302, Fei-Fei Liu201,490, Fenglin Liu381,491, Jia Liu492, Xingmin Liu56,396, Julie Livingstone6, Dimitri Livitz8, Naomi Livni221, Lucas Lochovsky5,19,110, Markus Loeffler467, Georgina V. Long211, Armando Lopez-Guillermo493, Shaoke Lou5,19, David N. Louis72, Laurence B. Lovat117, Yiling Lu38, Yong-Jie Lu162,494, Youyong Lu495,496,497, Claudio Luchini167, Ilinca Lungu144,148, Xuemei Luo152, Hayley J. Luxton117, Andy G. Lynch223,315,498, Lisa Lype36, Cristina López111,112, Carlos López-Otín499, Eric Z. Ma64, Yussanne Ma30, Gaetan MacGrogan500, Shona MacRae501, Geoff Macintyre223, Tobias Madsen73, Kazuhiro Maejima184, Andrea Mafficini177, Dennis T. Maglinte166,502, Arindam Maitra174, Partha P. Majumder174, Luca Malcovati232, Salem Malikic62,78, Giuseppe Malleo115, Graham J. Mann211,246,503, Luisa Mantovani-Löffler504, Kathleen Marchal505,506, Giovanni Marchegiani115, Elaine R. Mardis1,193,507, Adam A. Margolin31, Maximillian G. Marin37, Florian Markowetz223,315, Julia Markowski403, Jeffrey Marks508, Tomas Marques-Bonet61,81,386,509, Marco A. Marra30, Luke Marsden351, John W. M. Martens332, Sancha Martin49,510, Jose I. Martin-Subero81,511, Iñigo Martincorena49, Alexander Martinez-Fundichely301,302,451 Yosef E. Maruvka8,26,72, R. Jay Mashl1,2, Charlie E. Massie223, Thomas J. Matthew37, Lucy Matthews178, Erik Mayer221,512, Simon Mayes513, Michael Mayo30, Faridah Mbabaali272, Karen McCune514, Ultan McDermott49, Patrick D. McGillivray19, Michael D. McLellan1,3,20, John D. McPherson148,272,515, John R. McPherson179,180, Treasa A. McPherson260, Samuel R. Meier8, Alice Meng516, Shaowu Meng134, Andrew Menzies49, Neil D. Merrett115,517, Sue Merson178, Matthew Meyerson8,14,82, William U. Meyerson4,5, Piotr A. Mieczkowski518, George L. Mihaiescu76, Sanja Mijalkovic284, Ana Mijalkovic Mijalkovic-Lazic284, Tom Mikkelsen519, Michele Milella253, Linda Mileshkin103, Christopher A. Miller1 , David K. Miller113,170, Jessica K. Miller272, Gordon B. Mills33,34, Ana Milovanovic57, Sarah Minner520, Marco Miotto115, Gisela Mir Arnau267, Lisa Mirabello240, Chris Mitchell103, Thomas J. Mitchell49,315,352, Satoru Miyano375, Naoki Miyoshi375, Shinichi Mizuno521, Fruzsina Molnár-Gábor522, Malcolm J. Moore300, Richard A. Moore30, Sandro Morganella49, Quaid D. Morris127,490, Carl Morrison523,524, Lisle E. Mose134, Catherine D. Moser349, Ferran Muiños298,299, Loris Mularoni298,299, Andrew J. Mungall30, Karen Mungall30, Elizabeth A. Musgrove133, Ville Mustonen525,526,527, David Mutch528, Francesc Muyas52,53,74, Donna M. Muzny12, Alfonso Muñoz59, Jerome Myers529, Ola Myklebost461, Peter Möller530, Genta Nagae89, Adnan M. Nagrial170, Hardeep K. Nahal-Bose76, Hitoshi Nakagama531, Hidewaki Nakagawa184, Hiromi Nakamura118, Toru Nakamura388, Kaoru Nakano184, Tannistha Nandi532, Jyoti Nangalia49, Mia Nastic284, Arcadi Navarro61,81,386, Fabio C. P. Navarro19, David E. Neal223,352, Gerd Nettekoven533, Felicity Newell209,311, Steven J. Newhouse59, Yulia Newton37, Alvin Wei Tian Ng534, Anthony Ng535, Jonathan Nicholson49, David Nicol221, Yongzhan Nie321,536, G. Petur Nielsen72, Morten Muhlig Nielsen73, Serena Nik-Zainal49,281,282,537, Michael S. Noble8, Katia Nones209,311, Paul A. Northcott538, Faiyaz Notta148,539, Brian D. O’Connor76,540, Peter O’Donnell541, Maria O’Donovan282, Sarah O’Meara49, Brian Patrick O’Neill542, J. Robert O’Neill543, David Ocana59, Angelica Ochoa88, Layla Oesper544, Christopher Ogden221, Hideki Ohdan93, Kazuhiro Ohi375, Lucila Ohno-Machado244, Karin A. Oien523,545, Akinyemi I. Ojesina546,547,548, Hidenori Ojima549, Takuji Okusaka550, Larsson Omberg551, Choon Kiat Ong552, Stephan Ossowski52,53,74, German Ott553, B. F. Francis Ouellette76,554, Christine P’ng6, Marta Paczkowska6, Salvatore Paiella115, Chawalit Pairojkul523, Marina Pajic170, Qiang Pan-Hammarström56,555, Elli Papaemmanuil49, Irene Papatheodorou59, Nagarajan Paramasivam43,47, Ji Wan Park385, Joong-Won Park556, Keunchil Park557,558, Kiejung Park559, Peter J. Park264,266, Joel S. Parker518, Simon L. Parsons124, Harvey Pass560, Danielle Pasternack272, Alessandro Pastore276, Ann-Marie Patch209,311, Iris Pauporté251, Antonio Pea115, John V. Pearson209,311, Chandra Sekhar Pedamallu8,14,82, Jakob Skou Pedersen73,75, Paolo Pederzoli115, Martin Peifer270, Nathan A. Pennell561, Charles M. Perou129,518, Marc D. Perry76,77, Gloria M. Petersen562, Myron Peto22, Nicholas Petrelli563, Robert Petryszak59, Stefan M. Pfister426,465,564, Mark Phillips424, Oriol Pich298,299, Hilda A. Pickett478, Todd D. Pihl565, Nischalan Pillay566, Sarah Pinder567, Mark Pinese170, Andreia V. Pinho568, Esa Pitkänen60, Xavier Pivot569, Elena Piñeiro-Yáñez95, Laura Planko533, Christoph Plass345, Paz Polak8,14,15, Tirso Pons570, Irinel Popescu571, Olga Potapova572, Aparna Prasad52, Shaun R. Preston573, Manuel Prinz47, Antonia L. Pritchard311, Stephenie D. Prokopec6, Elena Provenzano574, Xose S. Puente499, Sonia Puig176, Montserrat Puiggròs57, Sergio Pulido-Tamayo505,506, Gulietta M. Pupo246, Colin A. Purdie575, Michael C. Quinn209,311, Raquel Rabionet52,53,576, Janet S. Rader577, Bernhard Radlwimmer397, Petar Radovic284, Benjamin Raeder60, Keiran M. Raine49, Manasa Ramakrishna49, Kamna Ramakrishnan49, Suresh Ramalingam578, Benjamin J. Raphael579, W. Kimryn Rathmell580, Tobias Rausch60, Guido Reifenberger475, Jüri Reimand6,44, Jorge Reis-Filho348, Victor Reuter348, Iker Reyes-Salazar298, Matthew A. Reyna579, Sheila M. Reynolds36, Esther Rheinbay8,14,72, Yasser Riazalhosseini189, Andrea L. Richardson323, Julia Richter111,128, Matthew Ringel581, Markus Ringnér181, Yasushi Rino582, Karsten Rippe405, Jeffrey Roach583, Lewis R. Roberts349, Nicola D. Roberts49, Steven A. Roberts584, A. Gordon Robertson30, Alan J. Robertson113, Javier Bartolomé Rodriguez57, Bernardo Rodriguez-Martin104,105,106, F. Germán Rodríguez-González83,332, Michael H. A. Roehrl44,123,148,234,585,586, Marius Rohde587, Hirofumi Rokutan440, Gilles Romieu588, Ilse Rooman170, Tom Roques262, Daniel Rosebrock8, Mara Rosenberg8,72, Philip C. Rosenstiel589, Andreas Rosenwald590, Edward W. Rowe221,591, Romina Royo57, Steven G. Rozen179,180,592, Yulia Rubanova17,127, Mark A. Rubin423,593,594,595,596, Carlota Rubio-Perez298,299,597, Vasilisa A. Rudneva60, Borislav C. Rusev177, Andrea Ruzzenente598, Gunnar Rätsch276,277,278,279,280,430, Radhakrishnan Sabarinathan298,299,599, Veronica Y. Sabelnykova6, Sara Sadeghi30, S. Cenk Sahinalp62,78,79, Natalie Saini357, Mihoko Saito-Adachi440, Gordon Saksena8, Adriana Salcedo6, Roberto Salgado600, Leonidas Salichos5,19, Richard Sallari8, Charles Saller601, Roberto Salvia115, Michelle Sam272, Jaswinder S. Samra115,602, Francisco Sanchez-Vega114,121, Chris Sander276,603,604, Grant Sanders134, Rajiv Sarin605, Iman Sarrafi62,78, Aya Sasaki-Oku184, Torill Sauer489, Guido Sauter520, Robyn P. M. Saw211, Maria Scardoni167, Christopher J. Scarlett170,606, Aldo Scarpa177, Ghislaine Scelo194, Dirk Schadendorf68,607, Jacqueline E. Schein30, Markus B. Schilhabel589, Matthias Schlesner47,80, Thorsten Schlomm84,608, Heather K. Schmidt1 , Sarah-Jane Schramm246, Stefan Schreiber609, Nikolaus Schultz121, Steven E. Schumacher8,323, Roland F. Schwarz59,403,405,610, Richard A. Scolyer211,448,602, David Scott428, Ralph Scully611, Raja Seethala612, Ayellet V. Segre8,613, Iris Selander260, Colin A. Semple434, Yasin Senbabaoglu276, Subhajit Sengupta614, Elisabetta Sereni115, Stefano Serra585, Dennis C. Sgroi72, Mark Shackleton103, Nimish C. Shah352, Sagedeh Shahabi234, Catherine A. Shang329, Ping Shang211, Ofer Shapira8,323, Troy Shelton271, Ciyue Shen603,604, Hui Shen615, Rebecca Shepherd49, Ruian Shi490, Yan Shi134, Yu-Jia Shiah6, Tatsuhiro Shibata118,616, Juliann Shih8,82, Eigo Shimizu375, Kiyo Shimizu617, Seung Jun Shin618, Yuichi Shiraishi375, Tal Shmaya285, Ilya Shmulevich36, Solomon I. Shorser6, Charles Short59, Raunak Shrestha62, Suyash S. Shringarpure217, Craig Shriver619, Shimin Shuai6,126, Nikos Sidiropoulos83, Reiner Siebert112,620, Anieta M. Sieuwerts332, Lina Sieverling205,237, Sabina Signoretti202,621, Katarzyna O. Sikora177, Michele Simbolo138, Ronald Simon520, Janae V. Simons134, Jared T. Simpson6,17, Peter T. Simpson473, Samuel Singer115,458, Nasa Sinnott-Armstrong8,217, Payal Sipahimalani30, Tara J. Skelly390, Marcel Smid332, Jaclyn Smith622, Karen Smith-McCune514, Nicholas D. Socci276, Heidi J. Sofia27, Matthew G. Soloway134, Lei Song240, Anil K. Sood623,624,625, Sharmila Sothi626, Christos Sotiriou244, Cameron M. Soulette37, Paul N. Span627, Paul T. Spellman22, Nicola Sperandio177, Andrew J. Spillane211, Oliver Spiro8, Jonathan Spring628, Johan Staaf181, Peter F. Stadler163,164,165, Peter Staib629, Stefan G. Stark277,279,618,630, Lucy Stebbings49, Ólafur Andri Stefánsson631, Oliver Stegle59,60,632, Lincoln D. Stein6,126, Alasdair Stenhouse633, Chip Stewart8, Stephan Stilgenbauer634, Miranda D. Stobbe52,61, Michael R. Stratton49, Jonathan R. Stretch211, Adam J. Struck31, Joshua M. Stuart24,37, Henk G. Stunnenberg396,635, Hong Su56,396, Xiaoping Su99, Ren X. Sun6, Stephanie Sungalee60, Hana Susak52,53, Akihiro Suzuki89,636, Fred Sweep637, Monika Szczepanowski128, Holger Sültmann67,638, Takashi Yugawa617, Angela Tam30, David Tamborero298,299, Benita Kiat Tee Tan639, Donghui Tan518, Patrick Tan180,532,592,640, Hiroko Tanaka375, Hirokazu Taniguchi616, Tomas J. Tanskanen641, Maxime Tarabichi49,290, Roy Tarnuzzer220, Patrick Tarpey642, Morgan L. Taschuk152, Kenji Tatsuno89, Simon Tavaré223,643, Darrin F. Taylor113, Amaro Taylor-Weiner8, Jon W. Teague49, Bin Tean Teh180,592,640,644,645, Varsha Tembe246, Javier Temes104,105, Kevin Thai76, Sarah P. Thayer393, Nina Thiessen30, Gilles Thomas646, Sarah Thomas221, Alan Thompson221, Alastair M. Thompson633, John F. Thompson211, R. Houston Thompson647, Heather Thorne103, Leigh B. Thorne176, Adrian Thorogood424, Grace Tiao8, Nebojsa Tijanic284, Lee E. Timms272, Roberto Tirabosco648, Marta Tojo106, Stefania Tommasi649, Christopher W. Toon170, Umut H. Toprak48,650, David Torrents57,81, Giampaolo Tortora651,652, Jörg Tost653, Yasushi Totoki118, David Townend654, Nadia Traficante103, Isabelle Treilleux655,656, Jean-Rémi Trotta61, Lorenz H. P. Trümper469, Ming Tsao124,539, Tatsuhiko Tsunoda183,657,658,659, Jose M. C. Tubio104,105,106, Olga Tucker660, Richard Turkington661, Daniel J. Turner513, Andrew Tutt323, Masaki Ueno376, Naoto T. Ueno662, Christopher Umbricht151,213,663, Husen M. Umer305,664, Timothy J. Underwood665, Lara Urban59,60, Tomoko Urushidate616, Tetsuo Ushiku339, Liis Uusküla-Reimand666,667, Alfonso Valencia57,81, David J. Van Den Berg166, Steven Van Laere307, Peter Van Loo290,291, Erwin G. Van Meir668, Gert G. Van den Eynden307, Theodorus Van der Kwast123, Naveen Vasudev137, Miguel Vazquez57,669, Ravikiran Vedururu267, Umadevi Veluvolu518, Shankar Vembu490,670, Lieven P. C. Verbeke506,671, Peter Vermeulen307, Clare Verrill351,672, Alain Viari177, David Vicente57, Caterina Vicentini177, K. Vijay Raghavan365, Juris Viksna673, Ricardo E. Vilain674, Izar Villasante57, Anne Vincent-Salomon635, Tapio Visakorpi190, Douglas Voet8, Paresh Vyas311,351, Ignacio Vázquez-García49,86,675,676, Nick M. Waddell209, Nicola Waddell209,311, Claes Wadelius677, Lina Wadi6, Rabea Wagener111,112, Jeremiah A. Wala8,14,82, Jian Wang56, Jiayin Wang1,40,66, Linghua Wang12, Qi Wang465, Wenyi Wang21, Yumeng Wang21, Zhining Wang220, Paul M. Waring523, Hans-Jörg Warnatz483, Jonathan Warrell5,19, Anne Y. Warren352,678, Sebastian M. Waszak60, David C. Wedge49,294,679, Dieter Weichenhan345, Paul Weinberger680, John N. Weinstein38, Joachim Weischenfeldt60,83,84, Daniel J. Weisenberger166, Ian Welch681, Michael C. Wendl1,10,11, Johannes Werner47,85, Justin P. Whalley61,682, David A. Wheeler12,13, Hayley C. Whitaker117, Dennis Wigle683, Matthew D. Wilkerson518, Ashley Williams244, James S. Wilmott211, Gavin W. Wilson6,148, Julie M. Wilson148, Richard K. Wilson1,684, Boris Winterhoff685, Jeffrey A. Wintersinger17,127,384, Maciej Wiznerowicz686,687, Stephan Wolf688, Bernice H. Wong689, Tina Wong1,30, Winghing Wong690, Youngchoon Woo250, Scott Wood209,311, Bradly G. Wouters44, Adam J. Wright6, Derek W. Wright133,691, Mark H. Wright217, Chin-Lee Wu72, Dai-Ying Wu285, Guanming Wu692, Jianmin Wu170, Kui Wu56,396, Yang Wu179,180, Zhenggang Wu64, Liu Xi12, Tian Xia693, Qian Xiang76, Xiao Xiao66, Rui Xing497, Heng Xiong56,396, Qinying Xu209,311, Yanxun Xu694, Hong Xue64, Shinichi Yachida118,695, Sergei Yakneen60, Rui Yamaguchi375, Takafumi N. Yamaguchi6, Masakazu Yamamoto120, Shogo Yamamoto89, Hiroki Yamaue376, Fan Yang490, Huanming Yang56, Jean Y. Yang696, Liming Yang220, Lixing Yang697, Shanlin Yang306, Tsun-Po Yang270, Yang Yang369, Xiaotong Yao408,698, Marie-Laure Yaspo483, Lucy Yates49, Christina Yau156, Chen Ye56,396, Kai Ye40,41, Venkata D. Yellapantula20,86, Christopher J. Yoon249, Sung-Soo Yoon463, Fouad Yousif6, Jun Yu699, Kaixian Yu700, Willie Yu701, Yingyan Yu702, Ke Yuan223,510,703, Yuan Yuan21, Denis Yuen6, Takashi Yugawa617, Christina K. Yung76, Olga Zaikova704, Jorge Zamora49,104,105,106, Marc Zapatka397, Jean C. Zenklusen220, Thorsten Zenz67, Nikolajs Zeps705,706, Cheng-Zhong Zhang8,707, Fan Zhang381, Hailei Zhang8, Hongwei Zhang494, Hongxin Zhang121, Jiashan Zhang220, Jing Zhang5, Junjun Zhang76, Xiuqing Zhang56, Xuanping Zhang66,369, Yan Zhang5,708,709, Zemin Zhang381,710, Zhongming Zhao711, Liangtao Zheng381, Xiuqing Zheng381, Wanding Zhou615, Yong Zhou56, Bin Zhu240, Hongtu Zhu700,712, Jingchun Zhu24, Shida Zhu56,396, Lihua Zou713, Xueqing Zou49, Anna deFazio246,247,714, Nicholas van As221, Carolien H. M. van Deurzen715, Marc J. van de Vijver523, L. van’t Veer716 & Christian von Mering433,717, The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) and International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC) curated consensus somatic mutation calls using whole exome sequencing (WES) and whole genome sequencing (WGS), respectively. Here, as part of the ICGC/TCGA Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) Consortium, which aggregated whole genome sequencing data from 2,658 cancers across 38 tumour types, we compare WES and WGS side-by-side from 746 TCGA samples, finding that ~80% of mutations overlap in covered exonic regions. We estimate that low variant allele fraction (VAF < 15%) and clonal heterogeneity contribute up to 68% of private WGS mutations and 71% of private WES mutations. We observe that ~30% of private WGS mutations trace to mutations identified by a single variant caller in WES consensus efforts. WGS captures both ~50% more variation in exonic regions and un-observed mutations in loci with variable GC-content. Together, our analysis highlights technological divergences between two reproducible somatic variant detection efforts.

Background: \ud Among patients with non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), data on intratumor heterogeneity and cancer genome evolution have been limited to small retrospective cohorts. We wanted to prospectively investigate intratumor heterogeneity in relation to clinical outcome and to determine the clonal nature of driver events and evolutionary processes in early-stage NSCLC.\ud \ud Methods: \ud In this prospective cohort study, we performed multiregion whole-exome sequencing on 100 early-stage NSCLC tumors that had been resected before systemic therapy. We sequenced and analyzed 327 tumor regions to define evolutionary histories, obtain a census of clonal and subclonal events, and assess the relationship between intratumor heterogeneity and recurrence-free survival.\ud \ud Results: \ud We observed widespread intratumor heterogeneity for both somatic copy-number alterations and mutations. Driver mutations in EGFR, MET, BRAF, and TP53 were almost always clonal. However, heterogeneous driver alterations that occurred later in evolution were found in more than 75% of the tumors and were common in PIK3CA and NF1 and in genes that are involved in chromatin modification and DNA damage response and repair. Genome doubling and ongoing dynamic chromosomal instability were associated with intratumor heterogeneity and resulted in parallel evolution of driver somatic copy-number alterations, including amplifications in CDK4, FOXA1, and BCL11A. Elevated copy-number heterogeneity was associated with an increased risk of recurrence or death (hazard ratio, 4.9; P=4.4×10−4), which remained significant in multivariate analysis.\ud \ud Conclusions: \ud Intratumor heterogeneity mediated through chromosome instability was associated with an increased risk of recurrence or death, a finding that supports the potential value of chromosome instability as a prognostic predictor. (Funded by Cancer Research UK and others; TRACERx ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT01888601.)

Bei der bereits veröffentlichten Originalversion des Artikels ist ein Fehler in der Abbildung 2B entstanden: bei der Kennzeichnung der Herkunft des Chromosom 4 wurde die falsche Patienten-ID angeben, korrekt ist die ID „CRUK0009“Anbei finden Sie die korrigierte Version. Wir entschuldigen uns für den Fehler und für alle dadurch eventuell entstandenen Un annehmlichkeiten.

Whole-exome sequencing studies have transformed our understanding of recurrent somatic mutations that contribute to cancer pathogenesis; however, these studies limit our ability to identify cancer-associated mutations to those that cause protein-coding changes. To more comprehensively catalogue cancer-associated gene alterations, we have extensively characterized tumor transcriptomes from 1,220 donors with matched whole-genome sequence data to identify recurrent RNA-level aberrations. Specifically, we created a unified RNA-Seq analysis pipeline including sequence alignment and quality control and subsequently identified gene alterations through outlier detection from estimated gene expression levels, alternative splicing, alternative transcription starts, and allele-specific expression and through identified RNA-edited sites and gene fusions. Our data represent an extensive catalog of RNA aberrations for each gene across 27 cancer types. We have also tested for genetic associations with these RNA phenotypes. Using an integrative analysis approach, we have mapped genome-wide cis and trans effects on individual RNA phenotypes, considering both common germline variants as well as somatic SNVs in gene promoters, enhancers, and intronic and other regions. Many of the regulatory associations we identify are not accessible by exome sequencing, underlining the importance of whole-genome sequence data. Utilizing this RNA-centric view, we have identified genes that are recurrently altered, yet have not been previously characterized as cancer genes or identified through DNA-level driver gene analysis. To identify further supporting evidence that these recurrent alterations are potential drivers, we identified genes with mutually exclusive RNA-level alterations. Our findings reveal new insights into selective advantages of somatic changes and molecular mechanisms of cancer. This work is by the Transcriptome Working Group of the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) consortium and authors are listed in alphabetical order. Citation Format: Samirkumar Amin, Philip Awadalla, Andrew Biankin, Paul Boutros, Alvis Brazma, Angela Norie Brooks, Claudia Calabrese, David Chang, Aurélien Chateigner, Ken Chen, Zechen Chong, Brian Craft, Chad Creighton, Deniz Demircioğlu, Nuno Fonseca, Milana Frenkel-Morgenstern, Gad Getz, Jonathan Göke, Mary Goldman, Liliana Greger, Syed Haider, Yao He, Katherine Hoadley, Yuan Ji, Andre Kahles, Ekta Khurana, Jan Korbel, Kjong Lehmann, Han Liang, Fenglin Liu, Maximillian Marin, Matthew Meyerson, Akinyemi Ojesina, Francis Ouellette, Chandra Pedamallu, Marc Perry, Gunnar Rätsch, Roland Schwarz, Yuichi Shiraishi, Cameron Soulette, Oliver Stegle, Patrick Tan, Alfonso Valencia, Linda Xiang, Christina Yung, Junjun Zhang, Fan Zhang, Zemin Zhang, Jingchun Zhu. Pan-cancer study of recurrent and heterogeneous RNA aberrations and association with whole-genome variants [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr SY10-02. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-SY10-02

The evolutionary features of clear-cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) have not been systematically studied to date. We analyzed 1,206 primary tumor regions from 101 patients recruited into the multi-center prospective study, TRACERx Renal. We observe up to 30 driver events per tumor and show that subclonal diversification is associated with known prognostic parameters. By resolving the patterns of driver event ordering, co-occurrence, and mutual exclusivity at clone level, we show the deterministic nature of clonal evolution. ccRCC can be grouped into seven evolutionary subtypes, ranging from tumors characterized by early fixation of multiple mutational and copy number drivers and rapid metastases to highly branched tumors with > 10 subclonal drivers and extensive parallel evolution associated with attenuated progression. We identify genetic diversity and chromosomal complexity as determinants of patient outcome. Our insights reconcile the variable clinical behavior of ccRCC and suggest evolutionary potential as a biomarker for both intervention and surveillance. We thank Aida Murra, Naheed Shaikh, Justine Korteweg, Jeremy Tai, Eleanor Carlyle, Leonora Conneely, KimEdmonds, Karla Lingard, Karen O'Meara, Helen Breeze, Sarah Sarker, Lesley Cooper, Linda Shephard, Susie Slater, and Catherine Rogers for study support. We thank the patients and their families. S.T. and H.X. are funded by Cancer Research UK (CRUK) (C50947/A18176). S.T., T.C., J.L., and M.G. are funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Biomedical Research Centre (BRC) at the Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research (A109). J.I.L. is funded by the Ministerio de Economia y Competitividad (MINECO, SAF2016-79847-R). M.S., A.S., J. Lynch, R.F., L.A., and L.S. are funded by the Royal Marsden Cancer Charity. K.L. is funded by UK Medical Research Council (MR/P014712/1). T.B.K.W. is funded by the European Union Seventh Framework Programme (FP7-People-2013-ITN). M.J.-H. is funded by the NIHR. N.M.L. is a Winton Group Leader in recognition of the Winton Charitable Foundation's support towards the establishment of The Francis Crick Institute. N.M.L. is additionally funded by a Wellcome Trust Joint Investigator Award (103760/Z/14/Z) and the MRC eMedLab Medical Bioinformatics Infrastructure Award (MR/L016311/1). M.K. is funded by the Danish Cancer Society grant (R90-A6213). P.C. is funded by the Wellcome Trust (WT088340MA). N.M. receives funding from CRUK, Rosetrees, and the NIHR BRC at University College London Hospitals. C.S. is a Royal Society Napier Research Professor. C.S. is funded by Cancer Research UK (TRACERx and CRUK Cancer Immunotherapy Catalyst Network), the CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, Stand Up 2 Cancer (SU2C), the Rosetrees and Stoneygate Trusts, NovoNordisk Foundation (THESEUS), Marie Curie Network PloidyNet, the NIHR BRC at University College London Hospitals, and the CRUK University College London Experimental Cancer Medicine Centre. C.S., O.P., D.R., I.C., and Z.S. are funded by NovoNordisk Foundation (16584). O.P., D.R., and I.C. are funded by the National Research, Development and Innovation Office of Hungary (NVKP_16-1-20160004). This work was supported by CRUK (Clinical Scientist Fellowship to S.T., C50947/A18176), The Francis Crick Institute, which receives its core funding from Cancer Reseach UK (FC010110), the UK Medical Research Council (FC010110), the Wellcome Trust (FC010110), and NIHR BRC at the Royal Marsden Hospital and Institute of Cancer Research (A109). High-performance computing was supported by eMedLab. The results published here are in whole or part based upon data generated by the TCGA Research Network: http://cancergenome.nih.gov/.

We present the most comprehensive catalogue of cancer-associated gene alterations through characterization of tumor transcriptomes from 1,188 donors of the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes project. Using matched whole-genome sequencing data, we attributed RNA alterations to germline and somatic DNA alterations, revealing likely genetic mechanisms. We identified 444 associations of gene expression with somatic non-coding single-nucleotide variants. We found 1,872 splicing alterations associated with somatic mutation in intronic regions, including novel exonization events associated with Alu elements. Somatic copy number alterations were the major driver of total gene and allele-specific expression (ASE) variation. Additionally, 82% of gene fusions had structural variant support, including 75 of a novel class called “bridged” fusions, in which a third genomic location bridged two different genes. Globally, we observe transcriptomic alteration signatures that differ between cancer types and have associations with DNA mutational signatures. Given this unique dataset of RNA alterations, we also identified 1,012 genes significantly altered through both DNA and RNA mechanisms. Our study represents an extensive catalog of RNA alterations and reveals new insights into the heterogeneous molecular mechanisms of cancer gene alterations.

As sequencing efforts continue to reveal the extent of the intratumor heterogeneity (ITH) present in human cancers, the importance of evolutionary studies attempting to trace its etiology has increased. Sequencing multiple samples or tumor regions from the same patient has become affordable and is an effective way of tracing these evolutionary pathways, understanding selection, and detecting clonal expansions in ways impractical with single samples alone. In this article, we discuss and show the benefits of such multisample studies. We describe how multiple samples can guide tree inference through accurate phasing of germline variants and copy-number profiles. We show their relevance in detecting clonal expansions and deriving summary statistics quantifying the overall degree of ITH, and discuss how the relationship of metastatic clades might give us insight into the dominant mode of cancer progression. We further outline how multisample studies might help us better understand selective processes acting on cancer genomes and help to detect neutral evolution and mutator phenotypes.

Regulation of gene expression in response to nutrient availability is fundamental to the genotype-phenotype relationship. The metabolic-genetic make-up of the cell, as reflected in auxotrophy, is hence a likely determinant of gene expression. Here, we addressed the importance of the metabolic-genetic background by monitoring transcriptome, proteome, and metabolome in a repertoire of sixteen Saccharomyces cerevisiae laboratory backgrounds, combinatorially perturbed in histidine, leucine, methionine and uracil biosynthesis. The metabolic background affected up to 85% of the coding genome. Suggesting widespread confounding, these transcriptional changes showed, on average, 83% overlap between unrelated auxotrophs, and 35% with previously published transcriptomes generated for non-metabolic gene knock-outs. Background-dependent gene expression correlated with metabolic flux and acted, predominantly through masking or suppression, on 88% of transcriptional interactions epistatically. As consequence, the deletion of the same metabolic gene in a different background could provoke an entirely different transcriptional response. Propagating to the proteome and scaling up at the metabolome, metabolic background dependencies reveal the prevalence of metabolism-dependent epistasis at all regulatory levels. Urging for a fundamental change of the prevailing laboratory practice of using auxotrophs and nutrient supplemented media, these results reveal epistatic intertwining of metabolism with gene expression on the genomic scale.

It is becoming clear that interconnected functional gene networks, rather than individual genes, govern stem cell self-renewal and differentiation. To identify epigenetic factors that impact on human epidermal stem cells we performed siRNA-based genetic screens for 332 chromatin modifiers. We developed a Bayesian mixture model to predict putative functional interactions between epigenetic modifiers that regulate differentiation. We discovered a network of genetic interactions involving EZH2, UHRF1 (both known to regulate epidermal self-renewal), ING5 (a MORF complex component), BPTF and SMARCA5 (NURF complex components). Genome-wide localization and global mRNA expression analysis revealed that these factors impact two distinct but functionally related gene sets, including integrin extracellular matrix receptors that mediate anchorage of epidermal stem cells to their niche. Using a competitive epidermal reconstitution assay we confirmed that ING5, BPTF, SMARCA5, EZH2 and UHRF1 control differentiation under physiological conditions. Thus, regulation of distinct gene expression programs through the interplay between diverse epigenetic strategies protects epidermal stem cells from differentiation.

Comparing proteomics and metabolomics allows insights into Staphylococcus aureus physiological growth. We update genome and proteome information and deliver strain-specific metabolic models for three S. aureus strains (COL, N315, and Newman). We find a number of differences in metabolism and enzymes. Growth experiments (glucose or combined with oxygen limitation) were conducted to measure external metabolites. Fluxes of the central metabolism were calculated from these data with low error. In exponential phase, glycolysis is active and amino acids are used for growth. In later phases, dehydroquinate synthetase is suppressed and acetate metabolism starts. There are strain-specific differences for these phases. A time series of 2-D gel protein expression data on COL strain delivered a second data set (glucose limitation) on which fluxes were calculated. The comparison with the metabolite-predicted fluxes shows, in general, good correlation. Outliers point to different regulated enzymes for S. aureus COL under these limitations. In exponential growth, there is lower activity for some enzymes in upper glycolysis and pentose phosphate pathway and stronger activity for some in lower glycolysis. In transition phase, aspartate kinase is expressed to meet amino acid requirements and in later phases there is high expression of glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase and lysine synthetase. Central metabolite fluxes and protein expression of their enzymes correlate in S. aureus.

Neisseria meningitidis serogroup B strains are responsible for most meningococcal cases in the industrialized countries, and strains belonging to the clonal complex ST-41/44 are among the most prevalent serogroup B strains in carriage and disease. Here, we report the first genome and transcriptome comparison of a serogroup B carriage strain from the clonal complex ST-41/44 to the serogroup B disease strain MC58 from the clonal complex ST-32. Both genomes are highly colinear, with only three major genome rearrangements that are associated with the integration of mobile genetic elements. They further differ in about 10% of their gene content, with the highest variability in gene presence as well as gene sequence found for proteins involved in host cell interactions, including Opc, NadA, TonB-dependent receptors, RTX toxin, and two-partner secretion system proteins. Whereas housekeeping genes coding for metabolic functions were highly conserved, there were considerable differences in their expression pattern upon adhesion to human nasopharyngeal cells between both strains, including differences in energy metabolism and stress response. In line with these genomic and transcriptomic differences, both strains also showed marked differences in their in vitro infectivity and in serum resistance. Taken together, these data support the concept of a polygenic nature of meningococcal virulence comprising differences in the repertoire of adhesins as well as in the regulation of metabolic genes and suggest a prominent role for immune selection and genetic drift in shaping the meningococcal genome.

DNA microarray technology has already revolutionized basic research in infectious diseases, and whole-genome sequencing efforts have allowed for the fabrication of tailor-made spotted microarrays for an increasing number of bacterial pathogens. However, the application of microarrays in diagnostic microbiology is currently hampered by the high costs associated with microarray experiments and the specialized equipment needed. Here, we show that a thorough bioinformatic postprocessing of the microarray design to reduce the amount of unspecific noise also allows the reliable use of spotted gene expression microarrays for gene content analyses. We further demonstrate that the use of only single-color labeling to halve the costs for dye-labeled nucleotides results in only a moderate decrease in overall specificity and sensitivity. Therefore, gene expression microarrays using only single-color labeling can also reliably be used for gene content analyses, thus reducing the costs for potential routine applications such as genome-based pathogen detection or strain typing.

Nature 545, 446–451 (2017); doi:10.1038/nature22364 For 6 of the 96 patients included in this Article (patients CRUK0014, CRUK0030, CRUK0048, CRUK0059, CRUK0096 and CRUK0097) incorrect tumour volumetric data and positron emission tomography (PET) tumour background ratio (TBR) data were analysed. This error occurred because of the incorrect assignment of patient identifiers during the anonymization mandated by the independent review board of pre-operative computed tomography (CT) scans belonging to these patients.

The internal transcribed spacer 2 (ITS2) is a widely used phylogenetic marker. In the past, it has mainly been used for species level classifications. Nowadays, a wider applicability becomes apparent. Here, the conserved structure of the RNA molecule plays a vital role. We have developed the ITS2 Database (http://its2.bioapps.biozentrum.uni-wuerzburg.de) which holds information about sequence, structure and taxonomic classification of all ITS2 in GenBank. In the new version, we use Hidden Markov models (HMMs) for the identification and delineation of the ITS2 resulting in a major redesign of the annotation pipeline. This allowed the identification of more than 160,000 correct full length and more than 50,000 partial structures. In the web interface, these can now be searched with a modified BLAST considering both sequence and structure, enabling rapid taxon sampling. Novel sequences can be annotated using the HMM based approach and modelled according to multiple template structures. Sequences can be searched for known and newly identified motifs. Together, the database and the web server build an exhaustive resource for ITS2 based phylogenetic analyses.

International audience; The pennate planktonic diatom Pseudo-nitzschia delicatissima is very common in temperate marine waters and often responsible for blooms. Due to its surrounding rigid silicate frustrule the diatom undergoes successive size reduction as its vegetative reproduction cycle proceeds. Since a long time the life cycle of diatoms has raised scientific interest and some years ago extensive samples of Pseudo-nitzschia have been taken from coastal waters. Mating and cell size reduction experiments were carried out and served us as a data basis for a probabilistic model of cell size reduction. We applied a homogenous non-stationary continuous-time Markov chain to model the development of individual diatoms from an initial size of about 80 μm until cell death which occured when the size reached its low at about 18μm. In contrast to conventional curve fitting models we are capable of calculating confidence intervals for estimates of the population ages as well as integrate the process of auxospore formation into the model. We thus propose a unique way to describe the stationary size distribution in a diatom population in terms of cell division and auxospore formation probabilities of its individuals.

This review summarizes some of the new trends in the fight against drug resistant bacteria. We review Gram-positive (e.g., S.aureus) and Gram-negative (e.g., Pseudomonas aeruginosa, Helicobacter pylori) bacteria, the current antibiotic resistance situation, as well as resistance spread and some recently discovered resistance mechanisms, such as those based on integrons and complex transposons. We then summarize several current routes to identify new drugs such as cationic antimicrobial peptides, novel acyldepsipeptides, RNA aptamers and lipopeptides. New drug strategies to treat resistant pathogens include eliciting growth in dormant bacteria, or a new way to attack efflux systems. Typical approaches from pharmacogenomics combined with systems biology and bioinformatics support these routes (simulations, metagenomics and metabolic network modeling), as well as the patient treatment (e.g., haplotyping and immune response).

Locomotion is driven by shape changes coordinated by the nervous system through time; thus, enumerating an animal's complete repertoire of shape transitions would provide a basis for a comprehensive understanding of locomotor behaviour. Here we introduce a discrete representation of behaviour in the nematode C. elegans. At each point in time, the worm’s posture is approximated by its closest matching template from a set of 90 postures and locomotion is represented as sequences of postures. The frequency distribution of postural sequences is heavy-tailed with a core of frequent behaviours and a much larger set of rarely used behaviours. Responses to optogenetic and environmental stimuli can be quantified as changes in postural syntax: worms show different preferences for different sequences of postures drawn from the same set of templates. A discrete representation of behaviour will enable the use of methods developed for other kinds of discrete data in bioinformatics and language processing to be harnessed for the study of behaviour., Author Summary Technology for recording neural activity is advancing rapidly and whole-brain imaging with single neuron resolution has already been demonstrated for smaller animals. To interpret such complex neural recordings, we need comprehensive characterizations of behaviour, which is the principal output of the brain. Animal tracking can increasingly be performed automatically but an outstanding challenge is finding ways to represent these behavioural data. We have focused on the movement of the nematode worm C. elegans to develop a quantitative representation of behaviour as a series of distinct postures. Each posture is analogous to a word in a language and so we can directly count the number of phrases that makes up the C. elegans behavioural repertoire. C. elegans has a very small nervous system but we find that its behavioural repertoire is still complex. As with human languages, there is a large number of possible phrases, but most are rarely used. When comparing different populations of worms or worms in different environments, we find that the difference between their behaviour is due to a subset of their entire repertoire. In the language analogy, these would correspond to idiomatic phrases that distinguish groups of speakers. A quantitative understanding of the nature of behavioural variation will inform research on the function and evolution of neural circuits.

The carbon metabolism of Listeria monocytogenes ( Lm ) EGD and the two isogenic mutant strains LmΔ prfA and Lm Δ prfA pPRFA* (showing no or enhanced expression, respectively, of the virulence factor PrfA) was determined by 13 C isotopologue perturbation. After growth of the bacteria in a defined medium containing a mixture of [U- 13 C 6 ]glucose and glucose with natural 13 C abundance (1:25, wt/wt), 14 amino acids were isolated and analyzed by NMR spectroscopy. Multiply 13 C-labeled isotopologues were determined quantitatively by signal deconvolution. The 13 C enrichments and isotopologue patterns allowed the reconstruction of most amino acid biosynthesis pathways and illustrated that overproduced PrfA may strongly influence the synthesis of some amino acids, notably that of the branched amino acids (Val, Ile, and Leu). Retrobiosynthetic analysis of the isotopologue compositions showed that degradation of glucose occurs to a large extent via the pentose phosphate pathway and that the citrate cycle is incomplete because of the absence of 2-oxoglutarate dehydrogenase activity. The reconstructed labeling pattern of oxaloacetate indicated its formation by carboxylation of pyruvate. This metabolic reaction seems to have a strong impact on the growth requirement in defined minimal medium. Bioinformatical steady-state network analyses and flux distribution predictions confirmed the experimental data and predicted metabolite fluxes through the enzymes of the pathways under study.

Introduction: We present a novel method to identify cancer driver genes that jointly examines any number of diverse transcriptomic alterations with the goal to uncover highly recurrent and heterogeneous patterns in 1190 samples across 26 cancer types as part of the PanCancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG) of the International Cancer Genome Consortium (ICGC). Motivation: Previous pan-cancer genomic studies have focused on the analysis of somatic mutations as the driver of phenotypic changes. Here, we propose a method to integrate a wide variety of RNA and DNA changes to redefine the concept of driver events and account for the transcriptome’s role in tumorigenesis. PTK2 provides a motivating example, since it has many RNA alterations that correlate with patient survival, such as overexpression, exon-skips, and alternative promoter usage. In our analysis, we integrate an unprecedented amount of various alterations including gene fusions, RNA editing, alternative splicing, expression outliers, alternative promoters, allele specific expression, and somatic mutations. This enables us to also identify mutually exclusive (MutE) and co-occurring (CoO) patterns between different types of alterations within a gene. Methods: Our method has 3 main strengths: flexibility to handle any number or type of alteration, sensitivity to different frequencies of alterations so rare events are not lost in the recurrence analysis, and diversity of ranking such that genes with multiple alterations are prioritized. Our method is summarized in two steps: 1) Identify genes that are both recurrently and heterogeneously altered across many samples by calculating a rank-based score for each gene. 2) Identify MutE and CoO patterns between alteration types for the genes identified in the previous step. To ensure that alterations were comparable, we applied a thresholding model to binarize all alterations for gene-sample pairs, allowing us to account for the properties of the different modalities involved. Step 1 of our method calculates a score for each gene that takes into account: 1) the number of alterations to a gene across all samples, 2) the rarity of each alteration, and 3) how many types of alterations are observed per gene. The score is then used to rank the genes and top genes are considered for MutE and CoO analyses. Results: Our top 100 ranked genes were highly enriched for cancer census genes (adjusted p-value: 2.06e-9), indicating that we identify cancer relevant genes. Our top five ranked cancer census genes were IGF2, ERBB2, RARA, CREBBP, and ARID1A; all of which had at least 4 of 7 possible alterations, showing our scoring method prioritizes genes with diverse alterations. We also found that alternative promoter usage and alternative splicing were highly co-occurring alterations, with PTK2 having the highest co-occurrence between them. In summary, we propose a new method to analyze various RNA disruptions and show it can yield new insights beyond genomic variation. Citation Format: Natalie R. Davidson, PanCancer Analysis of Whole Genomes 3 (PCAWG-3) for ICGC, Alvis Brazma, Angela N. Brooks, Claudia Calabrese, Nuno A. Fonseca, Jonathan Goke, Yao He, Xueda Hu, Andre Kahles, Kjong-Van Lehmann, Fenglin Liu, Gunnar Rätsch, Siliang Li, Roland F. Schwarz, Mingyu Yang, Zemin Zhang, Fan Zhang, Liangtao Zheng. Integrating diverse transcriptomic alterations to identify cancer-relevant genes [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2017; 2017 Apr 1-5; Washington, DC. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(13 Suppl):Abstract nr 389. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2017-389

Cancer is a somatic evolutionary process characterized by the accumulation of mutations, which contribute to tumor growth, clinical progression, immune escape, and drug resistance development. Evolutionary theory can be used to analyze the dynamics of tumor cell populations and to make inference about the evolutionary history of a tumor from molecular data. We review recent approaches to modeling the evolution of cancer, including population dynamics models of tumor initiation and progression, phylogenetic methods to model the evolutionary relationship between tumor subclones, and probabilistic graphical models to describe dependencies among mutations. Evolutionary modeling helps to understand how tumors arise and will also play an increasingly important prognostic role in predicting disease progression and the outcome of medical interventions, such as targeted therapy.

Background: We introduce Sequence Bundles--a novel data visualisation method for representing multiple sequence alignments (MSAs). We identify and address key limitations of the existing bioinformatics data visualisation methods (i.e. the Sequence Logo) by enabling Sequence Bundles to give salient visual expression to sequence motifs and other data features, which would otherwise remain hidden. Methods: For the development of Sequence Bundles we employed research-led information design methodologies. Sequences are encoded as uninterrupted, semi-opaque lines plotted on a 2-dimensional reconfigurable grid. Each line represents a single sequence. The thickness and opacity of the stack at each residue in each position indicates the level of conservation and the lines' curved paths expose patterns in correlation and functionality. Several MSAs can be visualised in a composite image. The Sequence Bundles method is designed to favour a tangible, continuous and intuitive display of information. RESULTS We have developed a software demonstration application for generating a Sequence Bundles visualisation of MSAs provided for the BioVis 2013 redesign contest. A subsequent exploration of the visualised line patterns allowed for the discovery of a number of interesting features in the dataset. Reported features include the extreme conservation of sequences displaying a specific residue and bifurcations of the consensus sequence. Conclusions: Sequence Bundles is a novel method for visualisation of MSAs and the discovery of sequence motifs. It can aid in generating new insight and hypothesis making. Sequence Bundles is well disposed for future implementation as an interactive visual analytics software, which can complement existing visualisation tools.

Intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity is the result of ongoing evolutionary change within each cancer. The expansion of genetically distinct sub-clonal populations may explain the emergence of drug resistance, and if so, would have prognostic and predictive utility. However, methods for objectively quantifying tumour heterogeneity have been missing and are particularly difficult to establish in cancers where predominant copy number variation prevents accurate phylogenetic reconstruction owing to horizontal dependencies caused by long and cascading genomic rearrangements. To address these challenges, we present MEDICC, a method for phylogenetic reconstruction and heterogeneity quantification based on a Minimum Event Distance for Intra-tumour Copy-number Comparisons. Using a transducer-based pairwise comparison function, we determine optimal phasing of major and minor alleles, as well as evolutionary distances between samples, and are able to reconstruct ancestral genomes. Rigorous simulations and an extensive clinical study show the power of our method, which outperforms state-of-the-art competitors in reconstruction accuracy, and additionally allows unbiased numerical quantification of tumour heterogeneity. Accurate quantification and evolutionary inference are essential to understand the functional consequences of tumour heterogeneity. The MEDICC algorithms are independent of the experimental techniques used and are applicable to both next-generation sequencing and array CGH data., Author Summary Cancer is a disease of random mutation and selection within the cellular genomes of an organism. As a result, when advanced disease is diagnosed, the cells comprising the tumour show a great amount of variability on the genomic level, a phenomenon termed intra-tumour genetic heterogeneity. Heterogeneity is thought to be one of the main reasons why tumors become resistant to therapy, and thus hinders personalised medicine approaches. If we want to understand tumour heterogeneity and its connection to resistance development we need to quantify it, which implies reconstructing the evolutionary history of cancer within the patient. Unfortunately, so far, methods for accurate reconstructions of these particular evolutionary trees and for quantification of heterogeneity have been missing. We here present MEDICC, a method that uses a minimum evolution criterion to compare cancer genomes based on genomic profiles of DNA content (copy-number profiles). It enables accurate reconstruction of the history of the disease and quantifies heterogeneity. It is specifically designed to deal with diploid human genomes, in that it disentangles genomic events on both parental alleles and includes a variety of accompanying algorithms to test for shapes of the evolutionary trees as well as the rate at which the cancer evolves.

Solid tumors are heterogeneous tissues composed of a mixture of cancer and normal cells, which complicates the interpretation of their molecular profiles. Furthermore, tissue architecture is generally not reflected in molecular assays, rendering this rich information underused. To address these challenges, we developed a computational approach based on standard hematoxylin and eosin-stained tissue sections and demonstrated its power in a discovery and validation cohort of 323 and 241 breast tumors, respectively. To deconvolute cellular heterogeneity and detect subtle genomic aberrations, we introduced an algorithm based on tumor cellularity to increase the comparability of copy number profiles between samples. We next devised a predictor for survival in estrogen receptor-negative breast cancer that integrated both image-based and gene expression analyses and significantly outperformed classifiers that use single data types, such as microarray expression signatures. Image processing also allowed us to describe and validate an independent prognostic factor based on quantitative analysis of spatial patterns between stromal cells, which are not detectable by molecular assays. Our quantitative, image-based method could benefit any large-scale cancer study by refining and complementing molecular assays of tumor samples.

Phylogenetic tree reconstruction is traditionally based on multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) and heavily depends on the validity of this information bottleneck. With increasing sequence divergence, the quality of MSAs decays quickly. Alignment-free methods, on the other hand, are based on abstract string comparisons and avoid potential alignment problems. However, in general they are not biologically motivated and ignore our knowledge about the evolution of sequences. Thus, it is still a major open question how to define an evolutionary distance metric between divergent sequences that makes use of indel information and known substitution models without the need for a multiple alignment. Here we propose a new evolutionary distance metric to close this gap. It uses finite-state transducers to create a biologically motivated similarity score which models substitutions and indels, and does not depend on a multiple sequence alignment. The sequence similarity score is defined in analogy to pairwise alignments and additionally has the positive semi-definite property. We describe its derivation and show in simulation studies and real-world examples that it is more accurate in reconstructing phylogenies than competing methods. The result is a new and accurate way of determining evolutionary distances in and beyond the twilight zone of sequence alignments that is suitable for large datasets., Comment: to appear in PLoS ONE

Transcriptional regulators play an important role for the survival of Neisseria meningitidis within its human host. We have recently shown that FarR acts as transcriptional repressor of the adhesin nadA in N. meningitidis. Here, we examined the FarR regulon by microarray analyses, qRT-PCR, and electrophoretic mobility shift assays, revealing that FarR is a highly specific repressor of nadA. We demonstrate by reporter gene fusion assays that alterations of the FarR binding site within the nadA promoter are sufficient to induce transcription of nadA. Furthermore, farR expression is growth phase-dependent. The highest transcription rate was observed in the late-exponential growth phase of meningococci. Upon contact with active components of the complement system in normal human serum, expression of farR is slightly downregulated. Concluding, we present FarR as an exquisitely specialized, growth phase-dependent, possibly complement-responsive transcriptional regulator in N. meningitidis.

Multiple sequence alignments (MSAs) are one of the most important sources of information in sequence analysis. Many methods have been proposed to detect, extract and visualize their most significant properties. To the same extent that site-specific methods like sequence logos successfully visualize site conservations and sequence-based methods like clustering approaches detect relationships between sequences, both types of methods fail at revealing informational elements of MSAs at the level of sequence-site interactions, i.e. finding clusters of sequences and sites responsible for their clustering, which together account for a high fraction of the overall information of the MSA. To fill this gap, we present here a method that combines the Fisher score-based embedding of sequences from a profile hidden Markov model (pHMM) with correspondence analysis. This method is capable of detecting and visualizing group-specific or conflicting signals in an MSA and allows for a detailed explorative investigation of alignments of any size tractable by pHMMs. Applications of our methods are exemplified on an alignment of the Neisseria surface antigen LP2086, where it is used to detect sites of recombinatory horizontal gene transfer and on the vitamin K epoxide reductase family to distinguish between evolutionary and functional signals.

Background: When purified phagosomes are incubated in the presence of actin under appropriate conditions, microfilaments start growing from the membrane in a process that is affected by ATP and the lipid composition of the membrane. Isolated phagosomes are metabolically active organelles that contain enzymes and metabolites necessary for lipid interconversion. Hence, addition of ATP, lipids, and actin to the system alter the steady-state composition of the phagosomal membrane at the same time that the actin nucleation is initiated. Our aim was to model all these processes in parallel. Results: We compiled detailed experimental data on the effects of different lipids and ATP on actin nucleation and we investigated experimentally lipid interconversion and ATP metabolism in phagosomes by using suitable radioactive compounds. In a first step, a complex lipid network interconnected by chemical reactions catalyzed by known enzymes was modelled in COPASI (Complex Pathway Simulator). However, several lines of experimental evidence indicated that only the phosphatidylinositol branch of the network was active, an observation that dramatically reduced the number of parameters in the model. The results also indicated that a lipid network-independent ATP-consuming activity should be included in the model. When this activity was introduced, the set of differential equations satisfactorily reproduced the experimental data. On the other hand, a molecular mechanism connecting membrane lipids, ATP, and the actin nucleation process is still missing. We therefore adopted a phenomenological (black-box) approach to represent the empirical observations. We proposed that lipids and ATP influence the dynamic interconversion between active and inactive actin nucleation sites. With this simple model, all the experimental data were satisfactorily fitted with a single positive parameter per lipid and ATP. Conclusion: By establishing an active 'dialogue' between an initial complex model and experimental observations, we could narrow the set of differential equations and parameters required to characterize the time-dependent changes of metabolites influencing actin nucleation on phagosomes. For this, the global model was dissected into three sub-models: ATP consumption, lipid interconversion, and nucleation of actin on phagosomal membranes. This scheme allowed us to describe this complex system with a relatively small set of differential equations and kinetic parameters that satisfactorily reproduced the experimental data. Fil: Kühnel, Marck. European Molecular Biology Laboratory; Alemania Fil: Mayorga, Luis Segundo. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Histología y Embriología de Mendoza Dr. Mario H. Burgos. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Instituto de Histología y Embriología de Mendoza Dr. Mario H. Burgos; Argentina. European Molecular Biology Laboratory; Alemania Fil: Dandekar, Thomas. Universität Würzburg; Alemania Fil: Thakar, Juilee. State University of Pennsylvania; Estados Unidos Fil: Schwarz, Roland. Universität Würzburg; Alemania Fil: Anes, Elsa. Universidad de Lisboa; Portugal Fil: Griffiths, Gareth. Consejo Nacional de Investigaciones Científicas y Técnicas. Centro Científico Tecnológico Conicet - Mendoza. Instituto de Histología y Embriología de Mendoza Dr. Mario H. Burgos. Universidad Nacional de Cuyo. Facultad de Ciencias Médicas. Instituto de Histología y Embriología de Mendoza Dr. Mario H. Burgos; Argentina. European Molecular Biology Laboratory; Alemania Fil: Reich, Jens. Max-Delbrück-Centrum für Molekulare Medizin; Alemania

Background Modeling of metabolic networks includes tasks such as network assembly, network overview, calculation of metabolic fluxes and testing the robustness of the network. Results YANAsquare provides a software framework for rapid network assembly (flexible pathway browser with local or remote operation mode), network overview (visualization routine and YANAsquare editor) and network performance analysis (calculation of flux modes as well as target and robustness tests). YANAsquare comes as an easy-to-setup program package in Java. It is fully compatible and integrates the programs YANA (translation of gene expression values into flux distributions, metabolite network dissection) and Metatool (elementary mode calculation). As application examples we set-up and model the phospholipid network in the phagosome and genome-scale metabolic maps of S.aureus, S.epidermidis and S.saprophyticus as well as test their robustness against enzyme impairment. Conclusion YANAsquare is an application software for rapid setup, visualization and analysis of small, larger and genome-scale metabolic networks.