Search

Candy provides little nutritional value and contributes to children's energy intake from added sugars. Factors influencing children's candy intake remain largely unknown. This study describes children's total candy intake (kcal) before and after a meal and examines associations of candy intake in both conditions with children's temperament and appetite among a predominantly White, highly educated sample. Children (n = 38, age 5–8 years) were given free access to 11 candies (5 chocolate, 6 non-chocolate) and non-food alternatives during a pre-meal and a post-meal condition. Parents completed the Child Behavior Questionnaire and the Child Eating Behavior Questionnaire. Total candy intake was less when offered after a meal (209.3 kcal; SD = 111.25) than before a meal when still hungry (283.6 kcal; SD = 167.3), but not statistically different. Individual differences in candy intake between conditions was calculated to categorize children into three groups: "Better Regulators" consumed more candy before a meal (39%), "Consistent/Poorer Regulators" consumed similar amounts before and after a meal regardless of hunger (32%), and "Most Disinhibited" children consumed more candy after a meal when not hungry (29%). The "Better Regulators" group was lowest in negative affect and the "Consistent/Poorer Regulators" group was highest in food responsiveness. Children's candy intake was high relative to daily energy needs both before and after a meal. Child negative affect and food responsiveness appear to be child characteristics that predispose children to poor self-regulation of candy intake before and after a meal. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Objective: The aim of this study was to identify longitudinal trajectories of conjoint development of executive function (EF) and obesity among a diverse sample of poor, rural youth and to evaluate individual differences in infant growth, parental BMI, and cumulative risk. Methods: Participants included 948 youth from the Family Life Project. Child anthropometrics were measured at 2 and 6 months and at 2, 3, 4, 5, 7, and 12 years. EF tasks were administered at 3, 4, and 5 years. Mothers reported youth birth weight, parental height and weight, and cumulative risk indicators. Results: Multidimensional growth mixture modeling identified three classes: "High EF – High Obesity Resilience"; "Low EF – Delayed‐Onset Severe Obesity"; and "Low EF – Early‐Onset Severe Obesity." Youth in the low‐EF, early‐onset class displayed higher birth weight and BMI at 6 months, whereas the low‐EF, delayed‐onset class had rapid weight gain during infancy, parents with class II obesity, and greater cumulative risk and was more likely to be Black and female. Conclusions: Despite increased obesity risk among this sample, the majority of youth exhibited higher EF and some degree of obesity resilience. Youth with EF deficits displayed the greatest risk for severe obesity but had differing BMI trajectories and obesity risk profiles, which has implications for obesity intervention. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

A letter to the editor is presented in response to a study that tested the Satter's Division of Responsibility in Feeding (sDOR) interpretation in relation to parents managing the snacks of their children, in a recent issue of the journal.

Background: To examine longitudinal associations of early neighborhood Child Opportunity Index 2.0 (COI) with children's BMI trajectories and identify whether household economic resources moderate relations of COI in infancy/toddlerhood and the preschool years to longitudinal BMI growth between 2 and 12 years. Methods: Family data ( n = 1091) were drawn from the Family Life Project, a longitudinal study of families residing in rural high-poverty areas. Neighborhood COI was obtained for each developmental period: infancy/toddlerhood (2-15 months) and the preschool years (2-5 years). BMIs were created from anthropometrics collected at six time points. Results: Higher neighborhood COIs during the infancy/toddlerhood ( β = -0.0130, p < 0.01) and preschool years ( β = -0.0093, p < 0.05) were associated with lower BMI at 5 years of age; although the latter became nonsignificant after adjusting for infancy/toddlerhood COI. Both household income and time spent in poverty moderated associations of infancy/toddlerhood exposure to neighborhood COI with BMI change. Among children residing in not poor households, higher neighborhood level child opportunity was associated with a slower increase in BMI from 2 to 12 years ( β = -0.0369, p < 0.05), and a lower BMI at 12 years ( β = -0.0395, p < 0.05). Conclusions: Neighborhood COI during the infant and toddler years is longitudinally associated with child growth, and long-term associations are evident among children residing in not poor households. Future work is needed to better understand how family and neighborhood-level resources interact to influence obesity risk, particularly for those at high risk.

Background: The neighborhood-level child opportunity index (COI) has been used in policy-based initiatives to identify and improve low-resource neighborhoods in order to impact child health. Understanding of how changes in COI can impact child growth, however, is lacking. Methods: Participants were 1124 children from the Family Life Project, a longitudinal birth cohort of families in rural, high-poverty areas. Youth anthropometrics were measured at eight assessments (ages 2 months through 12 years). Neighborhood COI was obtained at seven assessments (ages 2 months through 5 years) and used to create seven trajectory groups representing a change in COI: stayed low on all seven assessments, stayed moderate, stayed high, left low, declined from moderate, declined from high, and bounced around. Results: As hypothesized, moving from high COI neighborhoods into lower COI neighborhoods was associated with greater BMI growth and increased risk for obesity and severe obesity at 12 years. As hypothesized, the opposite effect, which approached significance at p = 0.056, was found among children who moved from low COI neighborhoods into higher COI neighborhoods. Specifically, moving into higher COI neighborhoods was associated with reduced BMI growth, and lower risk for severe obesity at 12 years. Conclusions: Moving into higher COI neighborhoods may be associated with healthier BMI growth, while the opposite effect may occur when moving into lower COI neighborhoods. Given the use of the COI in public health initiatives and growing evidence for its potential positive impact on child growth, future work is needed to replicate our findings among larger diverse samples.