Search

Background The Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) trials demonstrated efficacy/tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA for headache prevention in adults with chronic migraine. This post hoc analysis assessed time of onset of onabotulinumtoxinA after the first treatment in total and responder populations and consistency weekly through five treatment cycles. Methods In the 24-week, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase of PREEMPT, individuals were randomized 1:1 to onabotulinumtoxinA (155-195 U) or placebo every 12 weeks for two cycles. The primary pooled efficacy variable was change in headache days per 28 days at week 24. We assessed change in headache and migraine/probable migraine (hereafter migraine) days/week compared with baseline week 4. Results Baseline mean (SD) headache days/week (week 4 of baseline) for onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 688) and placebo (n = 696) were similar (4.8 [1.6] vs. 4.8 [1.6] days/week, respectively), as were migraine days/week (4.6 [1.7] vs. 4.6 [1.7] days/week). The effect of onabotulinumtoxinA on change in headache and migraine days/week was significantly greater than placebo at week 1, persisting from week 3 after the first treatment (−1.6 [2.2] vs. −1.1 [2.2] headache days/week [ p Conclusions Treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA is associated with significant reductions in headache and migraine days/week at week 1, persisting after week 3, compared with placebo. Combined with earlier reports showing onabotulinumtoxinA treatment results in a persistent and progressive reduction in headache days over 56 weeks, it is suggested peak benefit may require multiple treatments. Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT00156910 and NCT00168428.

ObjectiveEvaluate the impact of onabotulinumtoxinA treatment in adults with chronic migraine.MethodsPost-hoc analysis of pooled data from the 24-week, placebo-controlled, PREEMPT (NCT00156910,NCT00168428) and single-arm, 108-week COMPEL (NCT01516892) studies. Percentages of participants meeting responder status at 24, 48, or 108 weeks for clinically meaningful changes in headache days (≥50% reduction), Headache Impact Test (HIT-6; ≥5-point improvement), Migraine-Specific Quality-of-Life Questionnaire Role Function-Restrictive (MSQ-RFR; ≥10.9-point improvement), and either Average Daily Headache Severity (ADHS; ≥1-point improvement; PREEMPT) or Migraine Disability Assessment Scale (≥5-point improvement) were calculated.ResultsParticipants (N=1384) were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA (n=688) or placebo (n=696) in PREEMPT; 716 participants were enrolled in COMPEL. In PREEMPT, significantly more participants treated with onabotulinumtoxinA than placebo met responder criteria for change in headache days (44.8% vs 34.2%), HIT-6 (40.8% vs 25.3%), MSQ-RFR (59.0% vs 40.2%), and ADHS (35.5% vs 22.4%) scores at 24 weeks (allPConclusionsOnabotulinumtoxinA-treated participants demonstrated clinically meaningful improvements across multiple domains in the PREEMPT studies and up to 2 years in COMPEL.Sommer_Kathrine@Allergan.com

Background Chronic migraine (CM) is associated with high impact and reduced health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Methods Patients with CM from PREEMPT (Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy) were randomized (1:1) to receive onabotulinumtoxinA or placebo for two 12-week cycles in the double-blind (DB) phase, followed by three 12-week cycles of open-label (OL) onabotulinumtoxinA (onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA (O/O) and placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA (P/O) groups, respectively). HRQoL endpoints were assessed over 56 weeks using the Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) and the Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire (MSQ). HIT-6 score reductions ≥2.3 and ≥5 denoted between-group minimally important difference and within-patient clinically meaningful response, respectively. Results A total of 1236 participants (O/O, n = 607; P/O, n = 629) participated in both phases. The DB phase showed significantly reduced HIT-6 and MSQ for onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo (all p Conclusions Benefits of onabotulinumtoxinA on HRQoL versus baseline persisted throughout the OL phase. Statistical superiority in favor of O/O was demonstrated for HIT-6 through 48 weeks and for MSQ (role restrictive) at 56 weeks.

In addition to headache, persons with chronic migraine (CM) experience multiple symptoms, both ictal and interictal, that may contribute to their suffering. Translating clinical trial results into practice requires assessment of the results' clinical meaningfulness. When examining treatment benefit in this disabled patient population, multiple headache-symptom measures should be considered to fully reflect clinical relevance. Currently, only onabotulinumtoxinA is approved specifically for headache prophylaxis in adults with CM. Topiramate is the only other therapeutic agent with double-blind, placebo-controlled evidence in this population. Herein we evaluate the clinical meaningfulness of onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate as headache prophylaxis in CM by comparing primary endpoints from the placebo-controlled, double-blind phase of the Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) clinical program and the topiramate clinical trial (frequency of headache days [primary endpoint in PREEMPT; secondary in topiramate trial] and migraine/migrainous days [primary in topiramate trial, or “migraine/probable-migraine days”; secondary in PREEMPT]). Additionally, outcome measures such as responder rates, health-related quality of life, discontinuation rates, safety, and tolerability profiles are important clinical considerations. The clinical data indicate that statistically significant, clinically relevant treatment benefits exist for both onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate. These data support these treatments as meaningful headache prophylaxis in adults with CM. Perspective CM is a chronic pain condition. We sought to determine the clinical relevance of recent trials in this disabled population. Clinical data indicate that statistically significant, clinically relevant treatment benefits exist for both onabotulinumtoxinA and topiramate, and support use of these treatments as meaningful headache prophylaxis in CM.

Background OnabotulinumtoxinA has been shown to reduce headache-days among patients with chronic migraine (CM). The objective of this analysis was to determine whether onabotulinumtoxinA has an impact on headache-day severity in patients with CM among those patients who were deemed non-responders based on reduction in the frequency of headache days alone. Methods Data from the Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) clinical trial program (a 24-week, 2-treatment cycle, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase, followed by a 32-week, 3-treatment cycle, open-label phase) were pooled for analysis. Patients kept a daily diary to record headache severity on a 4-point scale (from none to severe), and a 6-domain Headache Impact Test (HIT-6) was used to determine the clinical impact of headaches. Analysis was undertaken to assess whether the subset of patients that were headache-day frequency non-responders at week 24 (patients with

Discovery of the neuromuscular effects of botulinum toxin began in the early 19th century and has continued to evolve. Currently, onabotulinumtoxinA is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for two cosmetic and eight medical indications, including chronic migraine (CM). CM is a disabling form of migraine characterized by ≥15 headache days monthly and is believed to result from neuronal hypersensitivity to proinflammatory mediators, upregulation of sensory receptors, and consequent maladaptive pain responses with peripheral and central sensitization. OnabotulinumtoxinA achieves migraine prophylaxis in CM through regulation of vesicular trafficking and exocytosis, inhibition of peripheral release of neuropeptides and inflammatory peptides, and reduced cell surface expression of certain ion channels and receptors. Clinically, efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA for CM has been shown in two phase III, placebo-controlled trials (PREEMPT 1 and PREEMPT 2). OnabotulinumtoxinA significantly reduced the number of headache days per 28-day cycle relative to placebo at week 24 (change from baseline: -8.4 days for onabotulinumtoxinA versus -6.6 days for placebo; P < 0.001, pooled data). OnabotulinumtoxinA improved health-related quality of life and had an acceptable safety profile. OnabotulinumtoxinA is the only approved treatment specifically for CM prevention and represents a safe and effective therapeutic for chronic migraineurs.

Objective: Chronic migraine (CM) is a prevalent and disabling neurological disorder. Phase III REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) clinical program assessed efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX\circledR) for prophylaxis of headaches in adults with CM. This secondary analysis assessed patients who received all five treatment cycles and completed the study. Materials and methods: PREEMPT (two phase III studies: 24-week double-blind, placebo-controlled [DBPC], parallel-group phase, followed by 32-week open-label [OL] phase) evaluated the efficacy and safety of onabotulinumtoxinA in CM ($\geq$15 days/month with headache lasting $\geq$4 h a day). Patients were randomized (1:1) to onabotulinumtoxinA or placebo every 12 weeks for two cycles, followed by onabotulinumtoxinA for three cycles. Multiple headache symptom measures were evaluated. Results for the completer (five cycles) subgroup of patients are reported. Results: Of 1384 total PREEMPT patients, 1005 received all five treatment cycles (513 received onabotulinumtoxinA only [onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA (O/O)] and 492 received two cycles of placebo then three cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA [placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA (P/O)]). Demographics were similar between treatment groups. At Week 56, after all patients were treated with onabotulinumtoxinA, there continued to be significant between-group differences favoring the O/O vs P/O group for the following headache symptom measures: LS mean change from baseline in frequencies of headache days (-12.0 O/O, -11.1 P/O; P = 0.035), migraine days (-11.6 O/O, -10.7 P/O; P = 0.038), and moderate/severe headache days (-11.0 O/O, -10.1 P/O; P = 0.042). For other measures (cumulative hours of headache on headache days, frequency of headache episodes, and percentage with severe Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6 score, and total HIT-6 and Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire scores), there were also large mean improvements from baseline. The percent of patients with a $\geq$50\% reduction from baseline in frequency of headache days was significantly greater for the onabotulinumtoxinA-only group at Week 56 (69.6\% O/O, 62.8\% P/O; P = 0.023). The treatment-related adverse event rate was 28.5\% for onabotulinumtoxinA vs 12.4\% for placebo in the DBPC phase and 34.8\% for patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA for all five cycles throughout the 56-week trials. Conclusions: This subgroup analysis demonstrated improvements with onabotulinumtoxinA treatment (five cycles) vs placebo (two cycles)/onabotulinumtoxinA (three cycles) for multiple headache symptom measures and suggests that at Week 56, patients treated earlier with onabotulinumtoxinA had better outcomes. These findings demonstrate the continued need and cumulative benefit over time with continued prophylaxis, an important and clinically pragmatic observation for clinicians and patients. \copyright 2013 The Authors. Acta Neurologica Scandinavica published by John Wiley \& Sons A/S. Published by John Wiley \& Sons Ltd.

OBJECTIVES: OnabotulinumtoxinA (onabotA) attenuates peripheral nociceptive transduction and consequently neuronal firing. The aim of this mechanistic study was to evaluate the effect of intra-articular (IA) onabotA in patients with painful knee osteoarthritis (OA).METHOD: We conducted a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled, 12-week trial using a single ultrasound-guided IA injection of onabotA (200 U). Patients (N = 121) were randomized to receive onabotA (n = 61) or placebo (n = 60). Mechanistic pain biomarkers and clinical outcomes were used for profiling the effect. The biomarkers were pressure pain thresholds (PPTs) from the knee joint (localized sensitization) and extra-articular sites (widespread sensitization), and wind-up pain (central sensitization). Clinical assessments included the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), average daily pain (ADP), patient global impression of change (GIC), and rescue medication. The painDETECT questionnaire (PD-Q) was used for subgrouping patients (nociceptive, neuropathic, and mixed/uncertain).RESULTS: The nociceptive and non-nociceptive groups were identical with respect to all baseline data. No significant differences in clinical efficacy parameters were found between onabotA and placebo in the entire population. The nociceptive group showed significant improvement after IA onabotA at week 8 for all WOMAC outcomes, ADP at weeks 9 and 10, and patient GIC at week 12, and significant reduction in rescue medication counts within each 14-day period at weeks 9 and 10. After 4, 8, and 12 weeks, significant correlations were obtained in the onabotA group between ADP (both the entire group and the nociceptive group) and various sensitization parameters. The nociceptive group showed pronounced effects on widespread sensitization.CONCLUSIONS: Intra-articular onabotA given to patients with nociceptive knee OA reduced pain sensitization together with improvement in pain and function.

We examined the effects of multiple treatments with low doses of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; BOTOX®, Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA) versus placebo for prophylaxis of episodic migraine. This was a series of 3 sequential, randomized, controlled studies of 418 patients with a history of 4 to 8 moderate to severe migraines per month. In study I, patients were randomized to treatment with placebo or BoNTA (7.5 U, 25 U, or 50 U) in predetermined fixed injection sites on the front and sides of the head only. In study II, patients continued to receive, or were randomized to, 2 consecutive treatments with 25 U or 50 U. In study III, patients were randomized to placebo or continuation of 25 U or 50 U. Injection cycles were each 4 months long. BoNTA and placebo produced comparable decreases from baseline in the frequency of migraines at each time point examined (P ≥ .201). No consistent, statistically significant differences were observed for any efficacy variable. Adverse events were similar among the groups within each study. In these exploratory studies of episodic migraine patients, repeated injections of low doses of BoNTA into fixed frontal, temporal, and glabellar sites were not more effective than placebo. BoNTA was safe and well tolerated. Perspective Beneficial effects of BoNTA in the treatment of migraine have been reported, but positive results are not universal, possibly because the optimal patient population and regimen are not yet definitively established. This study explores the effects of multiple injections of low BoNTA doses into fixed sites for episodic migraine.

OBJECTIVES To identify a treatment-responsive population for botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA) and to evaluate the safety and efficacy of 3 different doses of BoNTA as prophylactic treatment of chronic daily headache (CDH). PATIENTS AND METHODS A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of BoNTA in patients with CDH was conducted from July 6, 2001, through November 7, 2003, at 28 North American study centers. Eligible patients were injected with BoNTA at 225 U, 150 U, 75 U, or placebo and returned for additional masked treatments at day 90 and day 180. Patients were assessed every 30 days for 9 months. The primary efficacy end point was the mean change from baseline in the frequency of headache-free days at day 180 for the placebo nonresponder group. RESULTS For this study, 702 patients were enrolled and randomized. The primary efficacy end point was not met. Mean improvements from baseline at day 180 of 6.0, 7.9, 7.9, and 8.0 headache-free days per month were observed in the placebo nonresponder group treated with BoNTA at 225 U, 150 U, 75 U, or placebo, respectively ( P =.44). An a priori-defined analysis of headache frequency revealed that BoNTA at 225 U or 150 U had significantly greater least squares mean changes from baseline than placebo at day 240 (-8.4, -8.6, and -6.4, respectively; P =.03 analysis of covariance). Only 27 of 702 patients (3.8%) withdrew from the study because of adverse events, which generally were transient and mild to moderate. CONCLUSIONS Although the primary efficacy end point was not met, all groups responded to treatment. The 225 U and 150 U groups experienced a greater decrease in headache frequency than the placebo group at day 240. The placebo response was higher than expected. BoNTA was safe and well tolerated. Further study of BoNTA prophylactic treatment of CDH appears warranted.

Objective The approved use of onabotulinumtoxinA for prophylaxis of headaches in patients with chronic migraine (CM) involves treatment every 12 weeks. It is currently unknown whether patients who fail to respond to the first onabotulinumtoxinA treatment cycle will respond to subsequent treatment cycles. To help inform decisions about treating non-responders, we examined the probability of treatment cycle 1 non-responders responding in cycle 2, and cycle 1 and 2 non-responders responding in cycle 3. Methods Pooled PREEMPT data (two studies: a 24-week, 2-cycle, double-blind, randomised (1:1), placebo-controlled, parallel-group phase, followed by a 32-week, 3-cycle, open-label phase) evaluated onabotulinumtoxinA (155–195 U) for prophylaxis of headaches in persons with CM (≥15 days/month with headache ≥4 h/day). End points of interest included the proportion of study patients who first achieved a ≥50% reduction in headache days, moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, or a ≥5-point improvement in Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6. For treatment cycle 1, all eligible participants were included. For subsequent cycles, responders in a previous cycle were no longer considered first responders. Results Among onabotulinumtoxinA-treated patients (n=688) 49.3% had a ≥50% reduction in headache-day frequency during treatment cycle 1, with 11.3% and 10.3% of patients first responding during cycles 2 and 3, respectively. 54.2%, 11.6% and 7.4% of patients first responded with a ≥50% reduction in cumulative hours of headache, and 56.3%, 14.5% and 7.7% of patients first responded with a ≥5-point improvement in total HIT-6 during treatment cycles 1, 2 and 3, respectively. Conclusions A meaningful proportion of patients with CM treated with onabotulinumtoxinA who did not respond to the first treatment cycle responded in the second and third cycles of treatment. Trial registration number NCT00156910, NCT00168428.

Purpose To compare the efficacy and safety of ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution with its vehicle in the treatment of ocular inflammation after cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation. Design Multicenter clinical study. Participants One hundred four patients were prospectively randomized, 52 patients in treatment group, 52 patients in control group. Methods Patients received either ketorolac or vehicle four times daily in the operated eye for 14 days starting the day after surgery in a prospective, double-masked, randomized, parallel group study. Only patients with moderate or greater postoperative inflammation the day after surgery were enrolled. Main outcome measures The main outcome measures include inflammation (cell, flare, ciliary flush), intraocular pressure and visual acuity. Results Ketorolac was significantly more effective than vehicle in reducing the manifestations of postoperative ocular inflammation, including: anterior chamber cells ( P = 0.002) and flare ( P = 0.009), conjunctival erythema ( P = 0.010), ciliary flush ( P = 0.022), photophobia ( P = 0.027), and pain ( P = 0.043). Five times as many patients were dropped from the study for lack of efficacy from the vehicle group (22/52) than from the ketorolac group (4/52; P = 0.001). Ketorolac was found to be equally as safe as vehicle in terms of adverse events, changes in visual acuity, intraocular pressure, and biomicroscopic and ophthalmoscopic variables. Conclusions Ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution was significantly more effective than vehicle in the treatment of moderate or greater ocular inflammation following routine cataract surgery, while being as safe as vehicle.

PURPOSE: To investigate the efficacy and safety of ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution (Acular; Allergan, Inc, Irvine, California) in the treatment of moderate to severe anterior segment inflammation developing after unilateral cataract surgery with intraocular lens implantation. METHODS: Only patients who exhibited moderate or greater levels of cells and flare 1 day after surgery were included in this multicenter, double-masked, randomly assigned, parallel-group study. Topical ketorolac or vehicle solution (Allergan, Inc) was administered to the treated eye four times daily, starting the day after surgery and continuing for 14 days. RESULTS: Ketorolac was significantly more effective than the vehicle solution in reducing anterior chamber cells ( P ≤ .030) and flare ( P ≤ .025), conjunctival erythema ( P ≤ .046), ciliary flush ( P ≤ .006), tearing ( P ≤ .012), photophobia ( P ≤ .014), and pain ( P ≤ .049). Half as many patients from the ketorolac group (14/51) were discontinued from the study for lack of efficacy, compared with the vehicle group (28/51; P = .005). There was no significant difference between ketorolac and the vehicle solution in changes in visual acuity, intraocular pressure, biomicroscopic or ophthalmoscopic variables, or adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmic solution is safe and provides substantial anti-inflammatory activity in the treatment of moderate to severe anterior segment inflammation developing after cataract surgery and intraocular lens implantation.

Background and purpose OnabotulinumtoxinA was effective and well tolerated for prophylaxis of headache in patients with chronic migraine (CM) in two randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase 3 trials. To further assess the safety and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA in CM prophylaxis in adults, the pooled safety data from four double-blind, placebo-controlled trials were analyzed. Methods The pooled analysis included two phase 2 and two phase 3 double-blind, placebo-controlled trials. The safety population was 2436 patients, 1997 of whom received ≥1 dose of onabotulinumtoxinA. The studies shared similar dosing intervals (approximately 12 weeks) with doses between 75 and 260 U. Safety assessments included adverse events (AEs), physical examination and clinical laboratory tests. Results OnabotulinumtoxinA was safe and well tolerated, with a low discontinuation rate (3.4%) due to AEs. The majority of patients in this pooled analysis received doses between 150 and 200 U, with an average of 163 U per treatment cycle. Of the 1997 patients who received any onabotulinumtoxinA injections, 1455 patients (72.9%) reported at least one AE. Neck pain (12.6%) was the most common onabotulinumtoxinA-associated AE, followed by muscle weakness (8.0%), musculoskeletal stiffness (6.1%) and eyelid ptosis (4.6%). Serious AEs were infrequent, occurring in 5.4% of patients who received any onabotulinumtoxinA treatment and 3.0% of patients receiving placebo. AEs were consistent with the known tolerability profile of onabotulinumtoxinA. Conclusions Multiple treatments with onabotulinumtoxinA at doses of 75–260 U administered every 12 weeks, and up to five treatment cycles, were well tolerated for the prophylaxis of headache in adults with CM.

To compare the bioavailability and pupillary effect of flurbiprofen and indomethacin during phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation.Gimbel Eye Centre, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.In this prospective, randomized, double-masked study, 236 patients had cataract extraction by phacoemulsification and posterior chamber intraocular lens implantation. They received topical flurbiprofen 0.03% solution or indomethacin 1% suspension applied every 15 minutes for 60 to 75 minutes before surgery. An aqueous humor sample (100 microL) was taken immediately before the corneal incision was made. Pupil diameters (horizontal and vertical) were measured before aqueous humor sampling, after phacoemulsification, after irrigation and aspiration (I/A), and after acetylcholine instillation.Mean concentration of flurbiprofen and indomethacin in the aqueous humor was 59.8 ng/mL and 90.2 ng/mL, respectively (P.001). The percentage of dose detected in the aqueous humor was 4.38% in the flurbiprofen group and 0.21% in the indomethacin group (P.001). Pupil diameters were 7.2 and 7.3 mm presurgery and 7.0 and 7.0 mm after I/A in the flurbiprofen and indomethacin groups, respectively (P.05). No adverse events were reported in either group.Although the absolute concentration of indomethacin was higher, the percentage of dose detected in the aqueous humor was 20 times greater in the flurbiprofen than in the indomethacin group. Flurbiprofen is absorbed 20 times more readily than indomethacin. Both drugs were equally effective in preventing miosis during cataract surgery.

Results Pooled analyses demonstrated high responder rates among onabotulinumtoxinA-treated patients (n=688) after Treatment Cycle 1 in frequency of headache days (49.3% of patients), moderate/severe headache days (53.0%), and cumulative hours of headache on headache days (54.2%) and a 21;5-point improvement in HIT-6 (56.3%). After Treatment Cycle 2, an additional 11.314.5% of patients who did not respond to Treatment Cycle 1 became responders. With a third treatment, an additional 7.4-10.3% of patients became responders.

CM is a complex neurological disorder affecting approximately 2% of the general adult population. CM sufferers experience a broad range of debilitating symptoms.

Chronic migraine (CM) is a prevalent, disabling neurological disorder. PREEMPT demonstrated efficacy & safety of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) for prophylaxis of headaches in adults with CM.

Chronic migraine (CM) is a prevalent and disabling neurological disorder. OnabotulinumtoxinA is the only approved therapy specifically for CM. The results from randomized controlled trials often reflect, but rarely define, the spectrum of patient outcomes. The proportion of patients highly responsive to a therapy is an important endpoint and guide for clinicians and patients.

Acute headache medication overuse (MO) is common in patients with chronic migraine (CM). We evaluated safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA as preventive treatment of headache in CM patients with baseline MO (CM+MO) in a planned secondary analysis from two similarly designed, randomized, placebo-controlled, parallel, Phase III trials. Patients were randomized to treatment groups (155-195 U of onabotulinumtoxinA or placebo) using MO (patient-reported and diary-captured frequency of intake) as a stratifying variable. Of 1384 patients, 65.3% (n=904) met MO criteria (onabotulinumtoxinA: n=445, placebo: n=459). For the CM+MO subgroup at Week 24, statistically significant between-treatment group mean changes from baseline favoring onabotulinumtoxinA versus placebo were observed for headache days (primary endpoint: -8.2 vs. -6.2; p

Objective.— To evaluate safety and efficacy of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) as headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine. Background.— Chronic migraine is a prevalent, disabling, and undertreated neurological disorder. OnabotulinumtoxinA is the only approved prophylactic therapy in this highly disabled patient population. Design and Methods.— Two phase III, 24-week, double-blind, parallel-group, placebo-controlled studies, followed by a 32-week, open-label, single-treatment, onabotulinumtoxinA phase, were conducted (January 23, 2006 to August 11, 2008). Qualified subjects were randomized (1:1) to injections of onabotulinumtoxinA (155-195 U) or placebo every 12 weeks for 5 cycles (double-blind: 2, open-label: 3). The pooled primary variable was mean change from baseline in frequency of headache days. Secondary variables included proportion of patients with severe Headache Impact Test-6 score (≥60) and mean changes from baseline in frequencies of migraine days, moderate/severe headache days, and migraine episodes; cumulative hours of headache on headache days; and acute headache medication intakes. The primary time point was week 24. Assessments for the open-label phase (all patients treated with onabotulinumtoxinA) compared double-blind treatment groups (onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA vs placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA) and are summarized to give a descriptive view of consistent study results, with inferences regarding statistical significance only examined for week 56. Results.— A total of 1384 patients were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 688) or placebo (n = 696) in the double-blind phase; 607 (88.2%) onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA and 629 (90.4%) placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA patients continued into the open-label phase. OnabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA treatment statistically significantly reduced headache-day frequency vs placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA in patients with chronic migraine at week 56 (−11.7 onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA, −10.8 placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA; P = .019). Statistically significant reductions also favored onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA for several secondary efficacy variables at week 56, including frequencies of migraine days (−11.2 onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA, −10.3 placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA; P = .018) and moderate/severe headache days (−10.7 onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA, −9.9 placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA; P = .027) and cumulative headache hours on headache days (−169.1 onabotulinumtoxinA/onabotulinumtoxinA, −145.7 placebo/onabotulinumtoxinA; P = .018). After the open-label phase (all treated with onabotulinumtoxinA), statistically significant within-group changes from baseline were observed for all efficacy variables. Most patients (72.6%) completed the open-label phase; few discontinued because of adverse events. No new safety or tolerability issues emerged. Conclusions.— Repeated treatment with ≤5 cycles of onabotulinumtoxinA was effective, safe, and well tolerated in adults with chronic migraine.

To assess the effects of treatment with onabotulinumtoxinA (Botox, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) on health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and headache impact in adults with chronic migraine (CM).The Phase III Research Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy (PREEMPT) clinical program (PREEMPT 1 and 2) included a 24-week, double-blind phase (2 12-week cycles) followed by a 32-week, open-label phase (3 cycles). Thirty-one injections of 5U each (155 U of onabotulinumtoxinA or placebo) were administered to fixed sites. An additional 40 U could be administered "following the pain." Prespecified analysis of headache impact (Headache Impact Test [HIT]-6) and HRQoL (Migraine-Specific Quality of Life Questionnaire v2.1 [MSQ]) assessments were performed. Because the studies were similar in design and did not notably differ in outcome, pooled results are presented here.A total of 1,384 subjects were included in the pooled analyses (onabotulinumtoxinA, n = 688; placebo, n = 696). Baseline mean total HIT-6 and MSQ v2.1 scores were comparable between groups; 93.1% were severely impacted based on HIT-6 scores ≥60. At 24 weeks, in comparison with placebo, onabotulinumtoxinA treatment significantly reduced HIT-6 scores and the proportion of patients with HIT-6 scores in the severe range at all timepoints including week 24 (p0.001). OnabotulinumtoxinA treatment significantly improved all domains of the MSQ v2.1 at 24 weeks (p0.001).Treatment of CM with onabotulinumtoxinA is associated with significant and clinically meaningful reductions in headache impact and improvements in HRQoL.This study provides Class 1A evidence that onabotulinumtoxinA treatment reduces headache impact and improves HRQoL.

We conducted a double-masked, vehicle-controlled study to evaluate the anti-inflammatory effect of topical flurbiprofen in cataract surgery by phacoemulsification and implantation of a posterior chamber intraocular lens. The 233 patients were randomized to receive either flurbiprofen or vehicle immediately prior to and for two weeks following surgery. No concomitant corticosteroid use was allowed. The flurbiprofen group had significantly less anterior chamber cells and flare at day 7 and significantly less conjunctival erythema, corneal edema, and lid edema at day 14. The investigator's global effectiveness rating was higher in the flurbiprofen group at day 14. Blood-aqueous barrier disruption, as measured by aqueous fluorophotometry, was statistically significantly diminished in the flurbiprofen group. Burning and stinging were rated significantly greater in the flurbiprofen group than in the vehicle group. Foreign-body sensation and photophobia were significantly more severe in the vehicle group than in the flurbiprofen group. Flurbiprofen provided postsurgical anti-inflammatory efficacy in clinical signs of inflammation and in blood-aqueous barrier disruption, and also showed improved subjective signs.

(Headache 2010;50:921-936) Objective.— To assess the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of onabotulinumtoxinA (BOTOX®) as headache prophylaxis in adults with chronic migraine. Background.— Chronic migraine is a prevalent, disabling, and undertreated neurological disorder. Few preventive treatments have been investigated and none is specifically indicated for chronic migraine. Methods.— The 2 multicenter, pivotal trials in the PREEMPT: Phase 3 REsearch Evaluating Migraine Prophylaxis Therapy clinical program each included a 24-week randomized, double-blind phase followed by a 32-week open-label phase (ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers NCT00156910, NCT00168428). Qualified patients were randomized (1:1) to onabotulinumtoxinA (155-195 U) or placebo injections every 12 weeks. Study visits occurred every 4 weeks. These studies were identical in design (eg, inclusion/exclusion criteria, randomization, visits, double-blind phase, open-label phase, safety assessments, treatment), with the only exception being the designation of the primary and secondary endpoints. Therefore, the predefined pooling of the results was justified and performed to provide a complete overview of between-group differences in efficacy, safety, and tolerability that may not have been evident in individual studies. The primary endpoint for the pooled analysis was mean change from baseline in frequency of headache days at 24 weeks. Secondary endpoints were mean change from baseline to week 24 in frequency of migraine/probable migraine days, frequency of moderate/severe headache days, total cumulative hours of headache on headache days, frequency of headache episodes, frequency of migraine/probable migraine episodes, frequency of acute headache pain medication intakes, and the proportion of patients with severe (≥60) Headache Impact Test-6 score at week 24. Results of the pooled analyses of the 2 PREEMPT double-blind phases are presented. Results.— A total of 1384 adults were randomized to onabotulinumtoxinA (n = 688) or placebo (n = 696). Pooled analyses demonstrated a large mean decrease from baseline in frequency of headache days, with statistically significant between-group differences favoring onabotulinumtoxinA over placebo at week 24 (−8.4 vs −6.6; P

Background. Several randomized, controlled studies have reported benefits of botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; Allergan Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) over placebo in the treatment of migraine. Some studies reported significant benefits at dosages as low as 16 U, while other studies reported safety, tolerability, and efficacy at dosages up to 260 U. However, the optimal treatment paradigm and patient population have yet to be defined. Objective. To compare different injection sites and doses of BoNTA in the prevention of episodic migraine. Design and Methods. This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study of 232 patients with a history of four to eight moderate to severe migraines per month, with or without aura. Patients were randomized to placebo or one of four BoNTA groups that received injections into different muscle regions: frontal (10 U), temporal (6 U), glabellar (9 U), or all three areas (total dose 25 U). For 3 months following a single treatment, patients recorded migraine-related variables in a daily diary. Results. BoNTA and placebo produced comparable decreases from baseline in the frequency of migraines ( P ≥ 0.411). In general, no statistically significant differences were observed for any efficacy variable. The overall rates of adverse events (any type) or treatment-related adverse events were similar among the groups. Conclusions. In this exploratory study of episodic migraine patients, low-dose injections of BoNTA into the frontal, temporal, and/or glabellar muscle regions were not more effective than placebo. BoNTA was safe and well tolerated. Future studies may examine higher BoNTA doses, flexible injection sites, multiple treatments, and disallow concomitant prophylactic medications.

We studied the safety and efficacy of 0 U, 50 U, 100 U, 150 U (five sites), 86 Usub and 100 Usub (three sites) botulinum toxin type A (BoNTA; BOTOX®; Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA, USA) for the prophylaxis of chronic tension-type headache (CTTH). Three hundred patients (62.3± female; mean age 42.6 years) enrolled. For the primary endpoint, the mean change from baseline in the number of TTH-free days per month, there was no statistically significant difference between placebo and four BoNTA groups, but a significant difference favouring placebo vs. BoNTA 150 was observed (4.5 vs. 2.8 tension headache-free days/month; P = 0.007). All treatment groups improved at day 60. Although efficacy was not demonstrated for the primary endpoint, at day 90, more patients in three BoNTA groups had ≥50± decrease in tension headache days than did placebo ( P ≤ 0.024). Most treatment-related adverse events were mild or moderate, and transient. BoNTA was safe and well-tolerated in the study.

Objective To assess the efficacy and safety of botulinum toxin type A (BoNT-A; BOTOX, Allergan, Inc., Irvine, CA) for the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with chronic daily headache (CDH) without the confounding factor of concurrent prophylactic medications. Background Several open-label studies and an 11-month, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study suggest that BoNT-A may be an effective therapy for the prophylaxis of headaches in patients with CDH. Design and methods This was a subgroup analysis of an 11-month, randomized double-blind, placebo-controlled study of BoNT-A for the treatment of adult patients with 16 or more headache days per 30-day periods conducted at 13 North American study centers. All patients had a history of migraine or probable migraine. This analysis involved data for patients who were not receiving concomitant prophylactic headache medication and who constituted 64% of the full study population. Following a 30-day screening period and a 30-day single-blind, placebo injection, eligible patients were injected with BoNT-A or placebo and assessed every 30 days for 9 months The following efficacy measures were analyzed per 30-day periods: change from baseline in number of headache-free days; change from baseline in headache frequency; proportion of patients with at least 30% or at least 50% decrease from baseline in headache frequency; and change from baseline in mean headache severity. Acute medication use was assessed, and adverse events were recorded at each study visit. Results Of the 355 patients randomized in the study, 228 (64%) were not taking prophylactic medication and were included in this analysis (117 received BoNT-A, 111 received placebo injections). Mean age was 42.4+/-10.90 years; the mean frequency of headaches per 30 days at baseline was 14.1 for the BoNT-A group and 12.9 for the placebo group (P=.205). After two injection sessions, the maximum change in the mean frequency of headaches per 30 days was -7.8 in the BoNT-A group compared with only -4.5 in the placebo group (P=.032), a statistically significant between-group difference of 3.3 headaches. The between-group difference favoring BoNT-A treatment continued to improve to 4.2 headaches after a third injection session (P=.023). In addition, BoNT-A treatment at least halved the frequency of baseline headaches in over 50% of patients after three injection sessions compared to baseline. Statistically significant differences between BoNT-A and placebo were evident for the change from baseline in headache frequency and headache severity for most time points from day 180 through day 270. Only 5 patients (4 patients receiving BoNT-A treatment; 1 patient receiving placebo) discontinued the study due to adverse events and most treatment-related events were transient and mild to moderate in severity. Conclusions BoNT-A is an effective and well-tolerated prophylactic treatment in migraine patients with CDH who are not using other prophylactic medications.

chenoid infiltrate of lymphocytes. Immunofluorescence examination of a perivesicular papule was characterized by numerous ovoid bodies scattered in the papillary dermis. These stained for IgM, IgG, and fibrinogen. IgG, C3, and fibrinogen were also deposited linearly along the dermoepidermal junction. Immunofluorescence studies on normal-appearing skin showed a strong linear band of IgG and C3 at the dermoepidermal junction without staining of colloid bodies. Serum and blister fluid were positive at a titer of 1:80 for basement membrane zone (BMZ) antibodies. A diagnosis ofLPP was made. She was initially treated with prednisone, 40 mg daily (1.5 mg/kg/day), with a good response, no new vesicles appeared and the papular lesions cleared. After 2 weeks circulating BMZ antibodies decreased to a titer of 1:20. The dosage of prednisone was reduced to 20 mg daily for 14 days and then discontinued. Topical fluorinated corticoids were administered for an additional month. At that time she had resolution of all lesions. Two months later, she had a relapse of LP, without blistering, on both ankles. At the time of relapse circulating BMZ antibodies were absent.

Purpose: To Investigate the efficacy and safety of nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamine 0.5% ophthalmis solution in relieving pain following radial radial-keratotomy (RK) Setting: Multicenter clinical trial. Methods: Topical ketorolac was compared with its Vehicle in a double-maskedrandomized, parallel-group study involving, 170 RK patients. Patients were treated with nonpreserved ketorolac 0.5% ophthalmic solution or the vehicle 4 times daily beginning immediately after surgery and continuing for 3 days or or until they no longer had ocular pain. Results: At several, intervals, patients treated with ketorolac reported significantly greater pain relief and less pain intensity than patients treated with the vehicle. The time required for patients to first report “complete relief” or “no pain” was shorter in the ketorolac than in the vehicle group (P ≤ .006). Patients in the ketorolac group used less escape medication (acetaminophen), (P ≤ .001) and had fewer sleep difficulties (P ≤ .031), fewer symptoms of ocular discomfort (P ≤ .028), and less difficulty performing activities of daily living (P = .048). Patients treated with ketarolac experienced the same low rate of treatment-related adverse events as those treated with the vehicle and exhibited the same improvement in visual acuity and manifest refraction. Conclusions: Nonpreserved ketorolac tromethamme 0.5% opthalmic solution wassignificantly more effective than, and as safe as the vehicle in alleviating the postoperative pain associated with RK. This resulted in significant improvement in patient quality of life and less need for oral analgesics suggesting that topical ketorolac is an approprnate treatment option for ocular pain following RK.

CM is a prevalent, disabling primary headache disorder. Most patients in CM clinical trials overuse AHM. The efficacy of prophylactic medications in CM patients without overuse of AHM is unclear.

We examined the effect of acute cystoid macular edema (CME) on contrast sensitivity. Eyedrops were instilled into the surgically treated eye four times daily for two days preoperatively and for three months postoperatively. Angiographic and clinical CME were measured, as were contrast sensitivity and Snellen acuity. Jaeger visual acuity equivalents were calculated and digital imaging techniques used to simulate visual function. We found that angiographic CME reduces functional vision as measured by contrast sensitivity and visual acuity over a large range of sizes. In patients treated with the flurbiprofen vehicle, those without CME had higher mean contrast sensitivity scores than those with CME; this increased over time. Those treated with flurbiprofen and indomethacin had slightly higher contrast sensitivity scores than vehicle-treated patients; this also increased over time, most notably in the higher spatial frequencies. Flurbiprofen treatment improved contrast sensitivity in patients with and without CME significantly at 12 cycles per degree. Flurbiprofen-treated patients with CME in general had higher contrast sensitivity scores than vehicle-treated patients. In this population of patients having cataract surgery, treatment with flurbiprofen or indomethacin reduced the loss of functional vision associated with CME.

Seventy patients with tinea cruris or tinea corporis were treated with naftifine cream 1% or vehicle once daily for 4 weeks in this double-blind, randomized study. After two weeks, the patients using naftifine had a significantly higher mycologic cure rate than the vehicle-treated patients (79% vs. 31%, p less than 0.001), and they showed significantly better resolution of signs and symptoms. Statistically significantly differences favoring naftifine over its vehicle were found throughout the treatment period and 2 weeks posttreatment.

In this double-masked clinical trial, 72 patients undergoing cataract extraction surgery received a topical loading dose of 0.03% flurbiprofen or vehicle before surgery and one drop four times daily for 2 weeks after surgery. The severity of conjunctival hyperemia, aqueous humor cells, and aqueous humor flare was lower in the flurbiprofen-treated group than in the vehicle-treated group at all follow-up visits; the differences were significant on day 14. Four patients treated with flurbiprofen and two treated with vehicle exhibited postoperative hyphemas. Treatment with flurbiprofen appeared to decrease the severity of inflammation following cataract extraction surgery.

The Headache Impact Test (HIT)-6 was developed and has been validated in patients with various types of headache. The objective of this study was to report the psychometric properties of the HIT-6 among patients with chronic migraine. Data came from two international, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials of chronic migraine patients (N = 1,384) undergoing prophylaxis therapy. Confirmatory factor analysis and differential item functioning (DIF) analysis were used to test the latent structure and cross-cultural comparability of the HIT-6. Reliability, construct validity, and responsiveness were assessed. Two sets of criterion groups were used: (1) 28-day headache frequency