Search

Introduction: The clinical course after lumbar microdiscectomy is heterogenous. The primary aim was to evaluate the variability in long-term recovery and to identify outcome trajectories. The secondary aim was to assess whether factors at baseline could predict poor outcome trajectories. Methods: A latent class trajectory analysis was performed to identify outcome trajectories for leg pain (VAS), back pain (VAS), and disability (RMDQ). The best number of clusters was determined by using the Bayesian Information Criterion, Akaike's information criteria, entropy, and overall interpretability. Prediction models for poor outcome trajectories were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses. Results: We performed a prospective cohort study with 24 months follow-up and included 479 patients who underwent microdiscectomy. A four-class model provided the best fit for the data. Patients were assigned to the 'large improvement trajectory', the 'moderate improvement, the 'minimal improvement trajectory', and the 'relapse trajectory'. In total, 156 patients (32.6%) belonged to one or more than one poor outcome trajectory. Patients with previous treatment and those who had higher baseline pain and disability scores were more likely to belong to the poor outcome trajectories. Discussion: Patients who were classified as a member of the poor outcome trajectory for a specific outcome were not necessarily a member of a poor outcome trajectory for the other outcomes. Clinicians and patients should set appropriate expectations prior to surgery by illustrating the postoperative outcome trajectories that fit the patients' specific goals and expectations. Process evaluation: This study used commonly captured preoperative data. The role of other biomedical, personal and external factors should be further assessed. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Abstract Background Mortality from colorectal cancer is mainly due to metastatic liver disease. Improved understanding of the molecular events underlying metastasis is crucial for the development of new methods for early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer. Loss of chromosome 8p is frequently seen in colorectal cancer and implicated in later stage disease and metastasis, although a single metastasis suppressor gene has yet to be identified. We therefore examined 8p for genes involved in colorectal cancer progression. Methods Loss of heterozygosity analyses were used to map genetic loss in colorectal liver metastases. Candidate genes in the region of loss were investigated in clinical samples from 44 patients, including 6 with matched colon normal, colon tumour and liver metastasis. We investigated gene disruption at the level of DNA, mRNA and protein using a combination of mutation, semi-quantitative real-time PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemical analyses. Results We mapped a 2 Mb region of 8p21-22 with loss of heterozygosity in 73% of samples; 8/11 liver metastasis samples had loss which was not present in the corresponding matched primary colon tumour. 13 candidate genes were identified for further analysis. Both up and down-regulation of 8p21-22 gene expression was associated with metastasis. ADAMDEC1 mRNA and protein expression decreased during both tumourigenesis and tumour progression. Increased STC1 and LOXL2 mRNA expression occurred during tumourigenesis. Liver metastases with low DcR1/TNFRSF10C mRNA expression were more likely to present with extrahepatic metastases (p = 0.005). A novel germline truncating mutation of DR5/TNFRSF10B was identified, and DR4/TNFRSF10A SNP rs4872077 was associated with the development of liver metastases (p = 0.02). Conclusion Our data confirm that genes on 8p21-22 are dysregulated during colorectal cancer progression. Interestingly, however, instead of harbouring a single candidate colorectal metastasis suppressor 8p21-22 appears to be a hot-spot for tumour progression, encoding at least 13 genes with a putative role in carcinoma development. Thus, we propose that this region of 8p comprises a metastatic susceptibility locus involved in tumour progression whose disruption increases metastatic potential.

Background: Mortality from colorectal cancer is mainly due to metastatic liver disease. Improved understanding of the molecular events underlying metastasis is crucial for the development of new methods for early detection and treatment of colorectal cancer. Loss of chromosome 8p is frequently seen in colorectal cancer and implicated in later stage disease and metastasis, although a single metastasis suppressor gene has yet to be identified. We therefore examined 8p for genes involved in colorectal cancer progression.Methods: Loss of heterozygosity analyses were used to map genetic loss in colorectal liver metastases. Candidate genes in the region of loss were investigated in clinical samples from 44 patients, including 6 with matched colon normal, colon tumour and liver metastasis. We investigated gene disruption at the level of DNA, mRNA and protein using a combination of mutation, semi-quantitative real-time PCR, western blotting and immunohistochemical analyses.Results: We mapped a 2 Mb region of 8p21-22 with loss of heterozygosity in 73% of samples; 8/11 liver metastasis samples had loss which was not present in the corresponding matched primary colon tumour. 13 candidate genes were identified for further analysis. Both up and down-regulation of 8p21-22 gene expression was associated with metastasis. ADAMDEC1 mRNA and protein expression decreased during both tumourigenesis and tumour progression. Increased STC1 and LOXL2 mRNA expression occurred during tumourigenesis. Liver metastases with low DcR1/TNFRSF10C mRNA expression were more likely to present with extrahepatic metastases (p = 0.005). A novel germline truncating mutation of DR5/TNFRSF10B was identified, and DR4/TNFRSF10A SNP rs4872077 was associated with the development of liver metastases (p = 0.02).Conclusion: Our data confirm that genes on 8p21-22 are dysregulated during colorectal cancer progression. Interestingly, however, instead of harbouring a single candidate colorectal metastasis suppressor 8p21-22 appears to be a hot-spot for tumour progression, encoding at least 13 genes with a putative role in carcinoma development. Thus, we propose that this region of 8p comprises a metastatic susceptibility locus involved in tumour progression whose disruption increases metastatic potential. [ABSTRACT FROM AUTHOR]

Background Context: Mechanical Diagnosis and Treatment (MDT) and epidural steroid injections have the potential to reduce pain and disability in sciatica patients and prevent surgery. However, data on their combined influence in reducing the amount of sciatica surgeries is lacking., Purpose: To assess if a combination therapy (MDT and TESIs), administered while being on the waiting list for lumbar herniated disc surgery, is effective and cost-effective compared to no intervention (i.e., usual care)., Study Design: Multicentre randomized controlled trial with economic evaluation and one-year follow-up., Patient Sample: Seventy-two adult patients on a waiting list for lumbar herniated disc surgery., Outcome Measures: Primary outcome was undergoing lumbar disc surgery during follow-up (yes/no). Secondary outcomes included back and leg pain intensity (NPRS), physical functioning (RMDQ-23), self-perceived recovery (GPE), and health-related quality of life (EQ-5D-5L). Total societal and total healthcare were measured., Methods: Participants were randomly assigned to combination therapy (intervention group, n=34) or no intervention (control group, n=38)., Results: Twenty-nine out of 38 control group patients and 11 out of 34 intervention group patients received surgery. The adjusted odds ratio of receiving surgery in the intervention group compared to the control group was 0.09 (95%CI: 0.02 to 0.35) and the adjusted risk ratio 0.29 (95%CI: 0.08 to 0.69). There were no differences in clinical effects between both groups. Surgical, total societal, and total healthcare costs were on average €1,969, €1,754, and €2,363 lower in the intervention group, respectively. The combination therapy's probability of being cost-effective was moderate (≤0.66) across a range of willingness-to-pay values from €20,000/QALY to €80,000/QALY, from a societal perspective., Conclusion: Patients on the waiting list for lumbar disc surgery and who are open to postpone surgery, may benefit from the combination therapy intervention., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest Nil, (Copyright © 2025. Published by Elsevier Inc.)

Background Context: Lumbar microdiscectomy is an effective treatment for short-term pain relief and improvements in disability in patients with lumbar radiculopathy, however, many patients experience residual pain and long-term disability. The 'people like me' approach seeks to enhance personalized prognosis and treatment effectiveness, utilizing historical data from similar patients to forecast individual outcomes., Purpose: The primary objective was to develop and test the 'people-like-me' approach for leg pain intensity and disability at 12-month follow-up after lumbar microdiscectomy and postoperative physical therapy. The secondary objective was to verify the clinical utility of the prediction tool via case vignettes., Study Design/setting: A 12-month prospective cohort study., Patient Sample: Patients (N=618, mean age: 44.7) with lumbar radiculopathy who undergo a lumbar microdiscectomy and postoperative physical therapy., Outcome Measures: Leg pain intensity (Visual Analogue Scale) and disability (Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire) were measured at 12-months following surgery., Methods: Predictors were selected from data collected in routine practice before and 3-months after lumbar microdiscectomy. Predictive mean matching was used to select matches. Predictions were developed using preoperative data alone or combined with 3-month postoperative data. The prediction performance was evaluated for bias (difference between predicted and actual outcomes), coverage (proportion of actual outcomes within prediction intervals), and precision (accuracy of predictions) using leave-one-out cross-validation., Results: Overall, the 'people-like-me' approach using preoperative data showed accurate coverage and minimal average bias. However, precision based on preoperative data alone was limited. Incorporating 3-month postoperative data alongside preoperative predictors significantly enhanced prognostic precision for both leg pain and disability. Including postoperative data, leg pain prediction accuracy improved by 43% and disability by 23% compared to the sample mean. Adjusted R 2 values improved from 0.04 to 0.21 for leg pain, and from 0.07 to 0.34 for disability, enhancing model precision. The effectiveness of this method was highlighted in two case vignettes, illustrating its application in similar patient scenarios., Conclusion: The 'people-like-me' approach generated an accurate prognosis of 12-months outcomes following lumbar discectomy and physical therapy. Scheduling a 3-month postoperative follow-up to evaluate the course, and refine therapy plans and expectations for patients undergoing lumbar microdiscectomy would be recommended to assist clinicians and patients in more personalized healthcare planning and expectation setting., Competing Interests: Declaration of Competing Interest One or more of the authors declare financial or professional relationships on ICMJE-TSJ disclosure forms., (Copyright © 2024 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Rationale: Cervical radiculopathy is initially typically managed conservatively. Surgery is indicated when conservative management fails or with severe/progressive neurological signs. Personalised multimodal physiotherapy could be a promising conservative strategy. However, aggregated evidence on the (cost-)effectiveness of personalised multimodal physiotherapy compared to surgery with/without post-operative physiotherapy is lacking., Aim/objectives: To systematically summarise the literature on the (cost-)effectiveness of personalised multimodal physiotherapy compared to surgery with or without post-operative physiotherapy in patients with cervical radiculopathy., Methods: PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science were searched from inception to 1st of March 2023. Primary outcomes were effectiveness regarding costs, arm pain intensity and disability. Neck pain intensity, perceived recovery, quality of life, neurological symptoms, range-of-motion, return-to-work, medication use, (re)surgeries and adverse events were considered secondary outcomes. Randomised clinical trials comparing personalised multimodal physiotherapy versus surgical approaches with/without post-operative physiotherapy were included. Two independent reviewers performed study selection, data-extraction, and risk of bias assessment using the Cochrane RoB 2 and Consolidated Health Economic Evaluation Reporting Standards statement. Certainty of the evidence was determined using Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluations., Results: From 2109 records, eight papers from two original trials, with 117 participants in total were included. Low certainty evidence showed there were no significant differences on arm pain intensity and disability, except for the subscale 'heavy work' related disability (12 months) and disability at 5-8 years. Cost-effectiveness was not assessed. There was low certainty evidence that physiotherapy improved significantly less on neck pain intensity, sensory loss and perceived recovery compared to surgery with/without physiotherapy. Low certainty evidence showed there were no significant differences on numbness, range of motion, medication use, and quality of life. No adverse events were reported., Conclusion: Considering the clinical importance of accurate management recommendations and the current low level of certainty, high-quality cost-effectiveness studies are needed., (© 2024 The Author(s). Journal of Evaluation in Clinical Practice published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.)

Background Context: The proportion of patients who undergo lumbar microdiscectomy due to lumbar radiculopathy who are also overweight or obese is high. However, whether high body mass index (BMI) affects clinical outcomes is not well-studied., Purpose: To investigate the difference in the clinical course between normal weight, overweight, and obese patients with radiculopathy who underwent lumbar microdiscectomy followed by physical therapy and to evaluate whether high BMI is associated with poor recovery., Study Design/setting: A prospective cohort study with a 12-month follow-up was conducted in a multidisciplinary clinic., Patient Sample: We included 583 patients (median [IQR] age: 45 [35-52] years; 41% female) with clinical signs and symptoms of lumbar radiculopathy, consistent with magnetic resonance imaging findings, who underwent microdiscectomy followed by postoperative physical therapy., Outcome Measures: Outcomes were leg pain and back pain intensity measured with a visual analogue scale, disability measured with the Roland Morris Disability Questionnaire at 3 and 12-month follow-ups, and complications., Methods: Patients were classified as being normal weight (46.9%), overweight (38.4%), or obese (14.7%). A linear mixed-effects model was used to assess the difference in the clinical course of pain and disability between the three BMI categories. The association between BMI and outcomes was evaluated using univariable and multivariable logistic regression analyses., Results: All three patient groups experienced a significant improvement in leg pain, back pain, and disability over 3 and 12-month follow-up. Patients who were overweight, obese, or normal weight experienced comparable leg pain (p=.14) and disability (p=.06) over the clinical course (p=.14); however, obese patients experienced higher back pain (MD=-6.81 [95%CI: -13.50 to -0.14]; p=.03). The difference in back pain scores was not clinically relevant., Conclusions: In the first year following lumbar microdiscectomy, patients demonstrated clinical improvements and complications that were unrelated to their preoperative BMI., Competing Interests: Declaration of competing interest One or more of the authors declare financial or professional relationships on ICMJE-TSJ disclosure forms., (Copyright © 2023 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.)

Objectives: The clinical course of lumbar radiculopathy following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy varies substantially. No prior studies assessed this variability by deriving outcome trajectories. The primary aims of this study were to evaluate the variability in long-term recovery after lumbar microdiscectomy followed by post-operative physiotherapy and to identify outcome trajectories. The secondary aim was to assess whether demographic, clinical characteristics and patient-reported outcome measures routinely collected at baseline could predict poor outcome trajectories., Methods: We conducted a prospective cohort study with a 24-month follow-up. We included 479 patients with clinical signs and symptoms of lumbar radiculopathy confirmed by Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings, who underwent microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy. Outcomes were leg pain and back pain measured with Visual Analogue Scales, and disability measured with the Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire. Descriptive statistics were performed to present the average and the individual clinical course. A latent class trajectory analysis was conducted to identify leg pain, back pain, and disability outcome trajectories. The best number of clusters was determined using the Bayesian Information Criterion, Akaike's information criteria, entropy, and overall interpretability. Prediction models for poor outcome trajectories were assessed using multivariable logistic regression analyses., Results: Several outcome trajectories were identified. Most patients were assigned to the 'large improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 79.3%; back pain: 70.2%; disability: 59.5% of patients). Smaller proportions of patients were assigned to the 'moderate improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 7.9%; back pain: 10.6%; disability: 20.7% of patients), the 'minimal improvement' trajectory (leg pain: 4.9%, back pain: 6.7%, disability: 16.3% of patients) and the 'relapse' trajectory (leg pain: 7.9%; back pain: 12.5%; disability: 3.5%). Approximately one-third of patients (32.6%) belonged to one or more than one poor outcome trajectory. Patients with previous treatment (prior back surgery, injection therapy, and medication use) and those who had higher baseline pain and disability scores were more likely to belong to the poor outcome trajectories in comparison to the large improvement trajectories in back pain, leg pain and disability, and the moderate improvement trajectory in disability. The explained variance (Nagelkerke R2) of the prediction models ranged from 0.06 to 0.13 and the discriminative ability (Area Under the Curve) from 0.66 to 0.73., Conclusion: The clinical course of lumbar radiculopathy varied following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy, and several outcome trajectories could be identified. Although most patients were allocated to favorable trajectories, one in three patients was assigned to one or more poor outcome trajectories following microdiscectomy and post-operative physiotherapy for lumbar radiculopathy. Routinely gathered data were unable to predict the poor outcome trajectories accurately. Prior to surgery, clinicians should discuss the high variability and the distinctive subgroups that are present in the clinical course with their patients., (Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Published by Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.)

Objective: To determine the diagnostic accuracy of patient interview items and clinical tests to diagnose cervical radiculopathy., Design: A prospective diagnostic accuracy study., Participants: Consecutive patients (N=134) with a suspicion of cervical radiculopathy were included. A medical specialist made the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy based on the patient's clinical presentation and corresponding Magnetic Resonance Imaging findings. Participants completed a list of patient interview items and the clinical tests were performed by a physiotherapist., Main Outcome Measures: Diagnostic accuracy was determined in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and positive (+LR) and negative likelihood ratios (-LR). Sensitivity and specificity values ≥0.80 were considered high. We considered +LR≥5 and -LR≤0.20 moderate, and +LR≥10 and -LR≤0.10 high., Results: The history items 'arm pain worse than neck pain', 'provocation of symptoms when ironing', 'reduction of symptoms by walking with your hand in your pocket', the Spurling test and the presence of reduced reflexes showed high specificity and are therefore useful to increase the probability of cervical radiculopathy when positive. The presence of 'paraesthesia' and 'paraesthesia and/or numbness' showed high sensitivity, indicating that the absence of these patient interview items decreases the probability of cervical radiculopathy. Although most of these items had potentially relevant likelihood ratios, none showed moderate or high likelihood ratios., Conclusions: Several patient interview items, the Spurling test and reduced reflexes are useful to assist in the diagnosis of cervical radiculopathy. Because there is no gold standard for cervical radiculopathy, caution is required to not over-interpret diagnostic accuracy values., (Copyright © 2020 Chartered Society of Physiotherapy. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.)

Background: Mobile eHealth apps are important tools in personal health care management. The Patient Journey app was developed to inform patients with musculoskeletal disorders during their perioperative period. The app contains timely information, video exercises, and functional tasks. Although the Patient Journey app and other health apps are widely used, little research is available on how patients appreciate these apps., Objective: The primary aim of this study was to evaluate the user-friendliness of the Patient Journey app in terms of its usability and the attitudes of users toward the app. The secondary aim was to evaluate positive and negative user experiences., Methods: A web-based questionnaire was sent to 2114 patients scheduled for surgery for a musculoskeletal disorder. Primary outcomes were usability (measured with the System Usability Scale) and user attitudes regarding the Patient Journey app (assessed with the second part of the eHealth Impact Questionnaire). The secondary outcomes were evaluated with multiple choice questions and open-ended questions, which were analyzed via inductive thematic content analyses., Results: Of the 940 patients who responded, 526 used the Patient Journey app. The usability of the app was high (System Usability Scale: median 85.0, IQR 72.5-92.5), and users had a positive attitude toward the Information and Presentation provided via the app (eHealth Impact Questionnaire: median 78.0, IQR 68.8-84.4). The app did not adequately improve the users' confidence in discussing health with others (eHealth Impact Questionnaire: median 63.9, IQR 50.0-75.0) or motivation to manage health (eHealth Impact Questionnaire: median 61.1, IQR 55.6-72.2). Three core themes emerged regarding positive and negative user experiences: (1) content and information, (2) expectations and experiences, and (3) technical performance. Users experienced timely information and instructions positively and found that the app prepared and guided them optimally through the perioperative period. Negative user experiences were overly optimistic information, scarcely presented information about pain (medication), lack of reference data, insufficient information regarding clinical course deviations and complications, and lack of interaction with clinicians., Conclusions: The Patient Journey app is a usable, informative, and presentable tool to inform patients with musculoskeletal disorders during their perioperative period. The qualitative analyses identified aspects that can further improve the user experiences of the app., (©Stijn J Willems, Michel W Coppieters, Yvette Pronk, Miranda J F Diks, Klaas W A P van der Heijden, Servan Rooker, Gwendolyne G M Scholten-Peeters. Originally published in JMIR Human Factors (http://humanfactors.jmir.org), 08.02.2021.)

Study Design: Prospective cohort study., Objective: To develop and internally validate prognostic models based on commonly collected preoperative data for good and poor outcomes of lumbar microdiscectomy followed by physiotherapy., Summary of Background Data: Lumbar microdiscectomy followed by physiotherapy is a common intervention for lumbar radiculopathy. Postoperatively, a considerable percentage of people continues to experience pain and disability. Prognostic models for recovery are scarce., Methods: We included 298 patients with lumbar radiculopathy who underwent microdiscectomy followed by physiotherapy. Primary outcomes were recovery and secondary outcomes were pain and disability at 12 months follow-up. Potential prognostic factors were selected from sociodemographic and biomedical data commonly captured preoperatively. The association between baseline characteristics and outcomes was evaluated using multivariable logistic regression analyses., Results: At 12 months follow-up, 75.8% of the participants met the criterion for recovery. Variables in the model for good recovery included: younger age, leg pain greater than back pain, high level of disability, and a disc herniation at another level than L3-L4. The model for poor recovery included: lower educational level, prior back surgery, and disc herniation at L3-L4. Following internal validation, the explained variance (Nagelkerke R) and area under the curve for both models were poor (≤0.02 and ≤0.60, respectively). The discriminative ability of the models for disability and pain were also poor., Conclusion: The outcome of microdiscectomy followed by postoperative physiotherapy cannot be predicted accurately by commonly captured preoperative sociodemographic and biomedical factors. The potential value of other biomedical, personal, and external factors should be further investigated., Level of Evidence: 3.