Search

Your search keyword '"Rotellar, F."' showing total 550 results
Start Over Author "Rotellar, F."
550 results on '"Rotellar, F."'

3. Recurrent acute pancreatitis due to severe cicatricial pancreatic duct-anastomotic stenosis after laparoscopic ampullectomy: An EUS-guided endoscopic solution

Author

Castillo López, G., primary, Herráiz Bayod, M., additional, Merchán Gómez, B., additional, Alonso Sierra, M., additional, González Vázquez, S., additional, Prieto de Frías, C., additional, Alonso Burgos, A., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, Súbtil Íñigo, J.C., additional, Olid Velilla, M., additional, and Riesco López, J.M., additional

Published
2023
Full Text
View/download PDF

5. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Left and Extended Left Hepatectomy: An International Multicenter Study Propensity Score-Matched Analysis

Author

Sucandy I., Rayman S., Lai E. C., Tang C. -N., Chong Y., Efanov M., Fuks D., Choi G. -H., Chong C. C., Chiow A. K. H., Marino M. V., Prieto M., Lee J. -H., Kingham T. P., D'Hondt M., Troisi R. I., Choi S. H., Sutcliffe R. P., Cheung T. -T., Rotellar F., Park J. O., Scatton O., Han H. -S., Pratschke J., Wang X., Liu R., Goh B. K. P., Chan C. -Y., D'Silva M., Schotte H., De Meyere C., Krenzien F., Schmelzle M., Kadam P., Montalti R., Liu Q., Lee K. -F., Salimgereeva D., Alikhanov R., Lee L. S., Gastaca M., Jang J. Y., Lim C., Labadie K. P., Sucandy, I., Rayman, S., Lai, E. C., Tang, C. -N., Chong, Y., Efanov, M., Fuks, D., Choi, G. -H., Chong, C. C., Chiow, A. K. H., Marino, M. V., Prieto, M., Lee, J. -H., Kingham, T. P., D'Hondt, M., Troisi, R. I., Choi, S. H., Sutcliffe, R. P., Cheung, T. -T., Rotellar, F., Park, J. O., Scatton, O., Han, H. -S., Pratschke, J., Wang, X., Liu, R., Goh, B. K. P., Chan, C. -Y., D'Silva, M., Schotte, H., De Meyere, C., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Kadam, P., Montalti, R., Liu, Q., Lee, K. -F., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Lee, L. S., Gastaca, M., Jang, J. Y., Lim, C., and Labadie, K. P.

Subjects
Oncology, Surgery
Abstract

Background: Controversies exist among liver surgeons regarding clinical outcomes of the laparoscopic versus the robotic approach for major complex hepatectomies. The authors therefore designed a study to examine and compare the perioperative outcomes of laparoscopic left hepatectomy or extended left hepatectomy (L-LH/L-ELH) versus robotic left hepatectomy or extended left hepatectomy (R-LH/R-ELH) using a large international multicenter collaborative database. Methods: An international multicenter retrospective analysis of 580 patients undergoing L-LH/L-ELH or R-LH/R-ELH at 25 specialized hepatobiliary centers worldwide was undertaken. Propensity score-matching (PSM) was used at a 1:1 nearest-neighbor ratio according to 15 perioperative variables, including demographics, tumor characteristics, Child-Pugh score, presence of portal hypertension, multiple resections, histologic diagnosis, and Iwate difficulty grade. Results: Before the PSM, 190 (32 %) patients underwent R-LH/R-ELH, and 390 (68 %) patients underwent L-LH/L-ELH. After the matching, 164 patients were identified in each arm without significant differences in demographics, preoperative variables, medical history, tumor pathology, tumor characteristics, or Iwate score. Regarding intra- and postoperative outcomes, the rebotic approach had significantly less estimated blood loss (EBL) (100 ml [IQR 200 ml] vs 200 ml [IQR 235 ml]; p = 0.029), fewer conversions to open operations (n = 4 [2.4 %] vs n = 13, [7.9 %]; p = 0.043), and a shorter hospital stay (6 days [IQR 3 days] vs 7 days [IQR 3.3 days]; p = 0.009). Conclusion: Both techniques are safe and feasible in major hepatic resections. Compared with L-LH/L-ELH, R-LH/R-ELH is associated with less EBL, fewer conversions to open operations, and a shorter hospital stay.

Published
2022

6. Are the current difficulty scores for laparoscopic liver surgery telling the whole story? An international survey and recommendations for the future

Author

Abu Hilal, M., Aldrighetti, L., Al Saati, H., Alseidi, A., Aroori, S., Belli, G., Besselink, M., Edwin, B., D'Hondt, M., Dagher, I., Dejong, C., Geller, D., Hamady, Z., Hamoui, M., Isaksson, B., Ivanecz, A., Le Roux, G., Lesurtel, M., O'Rouke, N., Prasad, R., Prieto Calvo, M., Reddy, S., Rotellar, F., Santoyo, J., Soonawalla, Z., Soubrane, O., Stavrou, G., Subar, D., Sutcliffe, R., Tanis, P., Troisi, R., Van Dam, Ronald, Wakabayashi, G., White, S., Halls, Mark C., Cherqui, Daniel, Taylor, Mark A., Primrose, John N., and Abu Hilal, Mohammed

Published
2018
Full Text
View/download PDF

8. ASO Author Reflections: The Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Approach to Left and Extended Left Hepatectomy

Author

Rayman S., Jacoby H., Sucandy I., Goh B. K. P., Chan C. -Y., Han H. -S., D'Silva M., D'Hondt M., Schotte H., De Meyere C., Krenzien F., Schmelzle M., Pratschke J., Sutcliffe R. P., Kadam P., Troisi R. I., Giglio M., Montalti R., Liu R., Liu Q., Chong C. C., Lee K. -F., Efanov M., Salimgereeva D., Alikhanov R., Chiow A. K. H., Lee L. S., Prieto M., Gastaca M., Choi S. -H., Jang J. Y., Scatton O., Lim C., Park J. O., Labadie K. P., Lai E. C., Tang C. -N., Wang X., Chong Y., Fuks D., Choi G. -H., Marino M. V., Lee J. H., Kingham T. P., Cheung T. -T., Rotellar F., Rayman, S., Jacoby, H., Sucandy, I., Goh, B. K. P., Chan, C. -Y., Han, H. -S., D'Silva, M., D'Hondt, M., Schotte, H., De Meyere, C., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Pratschke, J., Sutcliffe, R. P., Kadam, P., Troisi, R. I., Giglio, M., Montalti, R., Liu, R., Liu, Q., Chong, C. C., Lee, K. -F., Efanov, M., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Chiow, A. K. H., Lee, L. S., Prieto, M., Gastaca, M., Choi, S. -H., Jang, J. Y., Scatton, O., Lim, C., Park, J. O., Labadie, K. P., Lai, E. C., Tang, C. -N., Wang, X., Chong, Y., Fuks, D., Choi, G. -H., Marino, M. V., Lee, J. H., Kingham, T. P., Cheung, T. -T., and Rotellar, F.

Subjects
Oncology, Surgery
Published
2022

18. An international multicenter propensity-score matched and coarsened-exact matched analysis comparing robotic versus laparoscopic partial liver resections of the anterolateral segments

Author

Kadam P., Sutcliffe R. P., Scatton O., Sucandy I., Kingham T. P., Liu R., Choi G. H., Syn N. L., Gastaca M., Choi S. -H., Chiow A. K. H., Marino M. V., Efanov M., Lee J. -H., Chong C. C., Tang C. -N., Cheung T. -T., Pratschke J., Wang X., Campos R. R., Ivanecz A., Park J. O., Rotellar F., Fuks D., D'Hondt M., Han H. -S., Troisi R. I., Goh B. K. P., Chan C. -Y., Prieto M., Schotte H., De Meyere C., Lai E., Krenzien F., Schmelzle M., Montalti R., Liu Q., Lee K. -F., Salimgereeva D., Alikhanov R., Lee L. -S., Jang J. Y., Lim C., Labadie K. P., Lopez-Lopez V., Kadam, P., Sutcliffe, R. P., Scatton, O., Sucandy, I., Kingham, T. P., Liu, R., Choi, G. H., Syn, N. L., Gastaca, M., Choi, S. -H., Chiow, A. K. H., Marino, M. V., Efanov, M., Lee, J. -H., Chong, C. C., Tang, C. -N., Cheung, T. -T., Pratschke, J., Wang, X., Campos, R. R., Ivanecz, A., Park, J. O., Rotellar, F., Fuks, D., D'Hondt, M., Han, H. -S., Troisi, R. I., Goh, B. K. P., Chan, C. -Y., Prieto, M., Schotte, H., De Meyere, C., Lai, E., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Montalti, R., Liu, Q., Lee, K. -F., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Lee, L. -S., Jang, J. Y., Lim, C., Labadie, K. P., and Lopez-Lopez, V.

Subjects
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, robotic liver resection, Hepatology, Liver Neoplasms, anterolateral segment, laparoscopic liver resection, Length of Stay, Postoperative Complications, Robotic Surgical Procedures, Hepatectomy, Humans, Laparoscopy, Surgery, Propensity Score, Retrospective Studies, minimally invasive liver surgery
Abstract

Background: Robotic liver resections (RLR) may have the ability to address some of the drawbacks of laparoscopic liver resections (LLR) but few studies have done a head-to-head comparison of the outcomes after anterolateral segment resections by the two techniques. Methods: A retrospective study was conducted of 3202 patients who underwent minimally invasive LR of the anterolateral liver segments at 26 international centres from 2005 to 2020. Two thousand six hundred and six cases met study criteria of which there were 358 RLR and 1868 LLR cases. Perioperative outcomes were compared between the two groups using a 1:3 Propensity Score Matched (PSM) and 1:1 Coarsened Exact Matched (CEM) analysis. Results: Patients matched after 1:3 PSM (261 RLR vs 783 LLR) and 1:1 CEM (296 RLR vs 296 LLR) revealed no significant differences in length of stay, readmission rates, morbidity, mortality, and involvement of or close oncological margins. RLR surgeries were associated with significantly less blood loss (50 mL vs 100 ml, P

Published
2022

19. Utility of the Iwate difficulty scoring system for laparoscopic right posterior sectionectomy: do surgical outcomes differ for tumors in segments VI and VII?

Author

Choi S. H., Chen K. -H., Syn N. L., Cipriani F., Cheung T. -T., Chiow A. K. H., Choi G. -H., Siow T. -F., Sucandy I., Marino M. V., Gastaca M., Chong C. C., Lee J. H., Ivanecz A., Mazzaferro V., Lopez-Ben S., Fondevila C., Rotellar F., Campos R. R., Efanov M., Kingham T. P., Sutcliffe R. P., Troisi R. I., Pratschke J., Wang X., D'Hondt M., Yong C. C., Levi Sandri G. B., Tang C. N., Ruzzenente A., Cherqui D., Ferrero A., Wakabayashi G., Scatton O., Aghayan D., Edwin B., Coelho F. F., Giuliante F., Liu R., Sijberden J., Abu Hilal M., Sugioka A., Long T. C. D., Fuks D., Aldrighetti L., Han H. -S., Goh B. K. P., Kang I., Jang J. Y., Chan C. -Y., D'Silva M., Schotte H., De Meyere C., Lai E., Krenzien F., Schmelzle M., Kadam P., Montalti R., Giglio M., Liu Q., Lee K. -F., Salimgereeva D., Alikhanov R., Lee L. -S., Prieto M., Lim C., Nghia P. P., Kojima M., Kato Y., Forchino F., Herman P., Kruger J. A. P., Saleh M., Pascual F., Dalla Valle B., Lopez-Lopez V., Casellas-Robert M., Giustizieri U., Citterio D., Mishima K., Fretland A. A., Ghotbi J., Ettorre G. M., Colasanti M., Guzman Y., Ardito F., Vani S., Wang H. -P., Choi, S. H., Chen, K. -H., Syn, N. L., Cipriani, F., Cheung, T. -T., Chiow, A. K. H., Choi, G. -H., Siow, T. -F., Sucandy, I., Marino, M. V., Gastaca, M., Chong, C. C., Lee, J. H., Ivanecz, A., Mazzaferro, V., Lopez-Ben, S., Fondevila, C., Rotellar, F., Campos, R. R., Efanov, M., Kingham, T. P., Sutcliffe, R. P., Troisi, R. I., Pratschke, J., Wang, X., D'Hondt, M., Yong, C. C., Levi Sandri, G. B., Tang, C. N., Ruzzenente, A., Cherqui, D., Ferrero, A., Wakabayashi, G., Scatton, O., Aghayan, D., Edwin, B., Coelho, F. F., Giuliante, F., Liu, R., Sijberden, J., Abu Hilal, M., Sugioka, A., Long, T. C. D., Fuks, D., Aldrighetti, L., Han, H. -S., Goh, B. K. P., Kang, I., Jang, J. Y., Chan, C. -Y., D'Silva, M., Schotte, H., De Meyere, C., Lai, E., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Kadam, P., Montalti, R., Giglio, M., Liu, Q., Lee, K. -F., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Lee, L. -S., Prieto, M., Lim, C., Nghia, P. P., Kojima, M., Kato, Y., Forchino, F., Herman, P., Kruger, J. A. P., Saleh, M., Pascual, F., Dalla Valle, B., Lopez-Lopez, V., Casellas-Robert, M., Giustizieri, U., Citterio, D., Mishima, K., Fretland, A. A., Ghotbi, J., Ettorre, G. M., Colasanti, M., Guzman, Y., Ardito, F., Vani, S., Wang, H. -P., Choi, Sung Hoon, Chen, Kuo-Hsin, Syn, Nicholas L, Cipriani, Federica, Cheung, Tan-To, Chiow, Adrian K H, Choi, Gi-Hong, Siow, Tiing-Foong, Sucandy, Iswanto, Marino, Marco V, Gastaca, Mikel, Chong, Charing C, Lee, Jae Hoon, Ivanecz, Arpad, Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Lopez-Ben, Santiago, Fondevila, Constantino, Rotellar, Fernando, Campos, Ricardo Roble, Efanov, Mikhail, Kingham, T Peter, Sutcliffe, Robert P, Troisi, Roberto I, Pratschke, Johann, Wang, Xiaoying, D'Hondt, Mathieu, Yong, Chee Chien, Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista, Tang, Chung Ngai, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Cherqui, Daniel, Ferrero, Alessandro, Wakabayashi, Go, Scatton, Olivier, Aghayan, Davit, Edwin, Bjørn, Coelho, Fabricio Ferreira, Giuliante, Felice, Liu, Rong, Sijberden, Jasper, Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Sugioka, Atsushi, Long, Tran Cong Duy, Fuks, David, Aldrighetti, Luca, Han, Ho-Seong, and Goh, Brian K P

Subjects
Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Laparoscopic liver, Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE, Operative Time, Liver Neoplasms, Carcinoma, Hepatocellular, Difficulty score, Length of Stay, Iwate, Laparoscopic hepatectomy, Right posterior sectionectomy, Treatment Outcome, Postoperative Complications, Humans, Hepatectomy, Surgery, Laparoscopy, Retrospective Studies
Abstract

Introduction: The Iwate Score (IS) have not been well-validated for specific procedures, especially for right posterior sectionectomy (RPS). In this study, the utility of the IS was determined for laparoscopic (L)RPS and the effect of tumor location on surgical outcomes was investigated. Methods: Post-hoc analysis of 647 L-RPS performed in 40 international centers of which 596L-RPS cases met the inclusion criteria. Baseline characteristics and perioperative outcomes of patients stratified based on the Iwate score were compared to determine whether a correlation with surgical difficulty existed. A 1:1 Mahalanobis distance matching was utilized to investigate the effect of tumor location on L-RPS outcomes. Results: The patients were stratified into 3 levels of difficulty (31 intermediate, 143 advanced, and 422 expert) based on the IS. When using a stepwise increase of the IS excluding the tumor location score, only Pringle’s maneuver was more frequently used in the higher surgical difficulty level (35.5%, 54.6%, and 65.2%, intermediate, advanced, and expert levels, respectively, Z = 3.34, p = 0.001). Other perioperative results were not associated with a statistical gradation toward higher difficulty level. 80 of 85 patients with a segment VI lesion and 511 patients with a segment VII lesion were matched 1:1. There were no significant differences in the perioperative outcomes of the two groups including open conversion, operating time, blood loss, intraoperative blood transfusion, postoperative stay, major morbidity, and mortality. Conclusion: Among patients undergoing L-RPS, the IS did not significantly correlate with most outcome measures associated with intraoperative difficulty and postoperative outcomes. Similarly, tumor location had no effect on L-RPS outcomes.

Published
2022

20. Comparison between the difficulty of laparoscopic limited liver resections of tumors located in segment 7 versus segment 8

Author

Efanov, M., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., A. G. R., Wu, Geller, D., Cipriani, F., Aghayan, D. L., Fretland, A. A., Sijberden, J., Belli, A., Marino, M. V., Mazzaferro, V., Chiow, A. K. H., Sucandy, I., Ivanecz, A., Choi, S. H., Lee, J. H., Prieto, M., Vivarelli, M., Giuliante, Felice, Ruzzenente, A., Yong, C. -C., Fondevila, C., Rotellar, F., Choi, G. -H., Robless Campos, R., Wang, X., Sutcliffe, R. P., Pratschke, J., Lai, E., Chong, C. C., D'Hondt, M., Monden, K., Lopez-Ben, S., Herman, P., Di Benedetto, F., Kingham, T. P., Liu, R., Long, T. C. D., Ferrero, A., Levi Sandri, G. B., Cherqui, D., Scatton, O., Wakabayashi, G., Troisi, R. I., Cheung, T. -T., Sugioka, A., Han, H. -S., Abu Hilal, M., Soubrane, O., Fuks, D., Aldrighetti, L., Edwin, B., Goh, B. K. P., Chan, C. -Y., Syn, N., D'Silva, M., Lee, B., Lim, C., Nghia, P. P., Gastaca, M., Schotte, H., De Meyere, C., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Lee, K. -F., Lee, L. S., Jang, J. Y., Kojima, M., Kato, Y., Ghotbi, J., Kruger, J. A. P., Coelho, F. F., Lopez-Lopez, V., Valle, B. D., Robert, M. C. I., Mishima, K., Montalti, R., Giglio, M., Wang, H. -P., Pascual, F., Saleh, M., Kadam, P., Tang, C. -N., Ardito, Francesco, Vani, S., Giustizieri, U., Citterio, D., Mocchegiani, F., Ettorre, G. M., Colasanti, M., Guzman, Y., Dogeas, E., Magistri, P., Mazzotta, A., Graduate School, Surgery, CCA - Cancer Treatment and Quality of Life, Efanov, M., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Wu, A. G. R., Geller, D., Cipriani, F., Aghayan, D. L., Fretland, A. A., Sijberden, J., Belli, A., Marino, M. V., Mazzaferro, V., Chiow, A. K. H., Sucandy, I., Ivanecz, A., Choi, S. H., Lee, J. H., Prieto, M., Vivarelli, M., Giuliante, F., Ruzzenente, A., Yong, C. -C., Fondevila, C., Rotellar, F., Choi, G. -H., Robless Campos, R., Wang, X., Sutcliffe, R. P., Pratschke, J., Lai, E., Chong, C. C., D'Hondt, M., Monden, K., Lopez-Ben, S., Herman, P., Di Benedetto, F., Kingham, T. P., Liu, R., Long, T. C. D., Ferrero, A., Levi Sandri, G. B., Cherqui, D., Scatton, O., Wakabayashi, G., Troisi, R. I., Cheung, T. -T., Sugioka, A., Han, H. -S., Abu Hilal, M., Soubrane, O., Fuks, D., Aldrighetti, L., Edwin, B., Goh, B. K. P., Chan, C. -Y., Syn, N., D'Silva, M., Lee, B., Lim, C., Nghia, P. P., Gastaca, M., Schotte, H., De Meyere, C., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Lee, K. -F., Lee, L. S., Jang, J. Y., Kojima, M., Kato, Y., Ghotbi, J., Kruger, J. A. P., Coelho, F. F., Lopez-Lopez, V., Valle, B. D., Robert, M. C. I., Mishima, K., Montalti, R., Giglio, M., Wang, H. -P., Pascual, F., Saleh, M., Kadam, P., Tang, C. -N., Ardito, F., Vani, S., Giustizieri, U., Citterio, D., Mocchegiani, F., Ettorre, G. M., Colasanti, M., Guzman, Y., Dogeas, E., Magistri, P., Mazzotta, A., Efanov, Mikhail, Salimgereeva, Diana, Alikhanov, Ruslan, Wu, Andrew G R, Geller, David, Cipriani, Federica, Aghayan, Davit L, Fretland, Asmund Avdem, Sijberden, Jasper, Belli, Andrea, Marino, Marco V, Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Chiow, Adrian K H, Sucandy, Iswanto, Ivanecz, Arpad, Choi, Sung Hoon, Lee, Jae Hoon, Prieto, Mikel, Vivarelli, Marco, Giuliante, Felice, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Yong, Chee-Chien, Fondevila, Constantino, Rotellar, Fernando, Choi, Gi-Hong, Robless Campos, Ricardo, Wang, Xiaoying, Sutcliffe, Robert P, Pratschke, Johann, Lai, Eric, Chong, Charing C, D'Hondt, Mathieu, Monden, Kazuteru, Lopez-Ben, Santiago, Herman, Paulo, Di Benedetto, Fabrizio, Kingham, T Peter, Liu, Rong, Long, Tran Cong Duy, Ferrero, Alessandro, Levi Sandri, Giovanni Battista, Cherqui, Daniel, Scatton, Olivier, Wakabayashi, Go, Troisi, Roberto I, Cheung, Tan-To, Sugioka, Atsushi, Han, Ho-Seong, Abu Hilal, Mohammad, Soubrane, Olivier, Fuks, David, Aldrighetti, Luca, Edwin, Bjorn, and Goh, Brian K P

Subjects
hepatectomy, laparoscopy, liver resection, posterosuperior segments, risk score, Hepatology, Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE, Surgery, posterosuperior segment
Abstract

Background: Presently, according to different difficulty scoring systems, there is no difference in complexity estimation of laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) of segments 7 and 8. However, there is no published data supporting this assumption. To date, no studies have compared the outcomes of laparoscopic parenchyma-sparing resection of the liver segments 7 and 8. Methods: A post hoc analysis of patients undergoing LLR of segments 7 and 8 in 46 centers between 2004 and 2020 was performed. 1:1 Propensity score matching (PSM) was used to compare isolated LLR of segments 7 and 8. Subset analyses were also performed to compare atypical resections and segmentectomies of 7 and 8. Results: A total of 2411 patients were identified, and 1691 patients met the inclusion criteria. Comparison after PSM between the entire cohort of segment 7 and segment 8 resections revealed inferior results for segment 7 resection in terms of increased blood loss, blood transfusions, and conversions to open surgery. Subset analyses of only atypical resections similarly demonstrated poorer outcomes for segment 7 in terms of increased blood loss, operation time, blood transfusions, and conversions to open surgery. Conversely, a subgroup analysis of segmentectomies after PSM found better outcomes for segment 7 in terms of a shorter operation time and hospital stay. Conclusion: Differences in the outcomes of segments 7 and 8 resections suggest a greater difficulty of laparoscopic atypical resection of segment 7 compared to segment 8, and greater difficulty of segmentectomy 8 compared to segmentectomy 7.

Published
2022

21. Impact of tumor size on the difficulty of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomies

Author

Arizza, G., Russolillo, N., Ferrero, A., Syn, N. L., Cipriani, F., Aghayan, D., Marino, M. V., Memeo, R., Mazzaferro, V., Chiow, A. K. H., Sucandy, I., Ivanecz, A., Vivarelli, M., Di Benedetto, F., Choi, S. -H., Lee, J. H., Park, J. O., Gastaca, M., Fondevila, C., Efanov, M., Rotellar, F., Choi, G. -H., Robles-Campos, R., Wang, X., Sutcliffe, R. P., Pratschke, J., Tang, C. N., Chong, C. C., D'Hondt, M., Yong, C. C., Ruzzenente, A., Herman, P., Kingham, T. P., Scatton, O., Liu, R., Levi Sandri, G. B., Soubrane, O., Mejia, A., Lopez-Ben, S., Monden, K., Wakabayashi, G., Cherqui, D., Troisi, R. I., Yin, M., Giuliante, Felice, Geller, D., Sugioka, A., Edwin, B., Cheung, T. -T., Long, T. C. D., Hilal, M. A., Fuks, D., Chen, K. -H., Aldrighetti, L., Han, H. -S., Goh, B. K. P., Chan, C. -Y., Prieto, M., Meurs, J., De Meyere, C., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Lee, K. -F., K. K., Ng, Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Lee, L. -S., Jang, J. Y., Labadie, K. P., Kato, Y., Kojima, M., Fretland, A. A., Ghotbi, J., Coelho, F. F., Kruger, J. A. P., Lopez-Lopez, V., Magistri, P., Robert, M. C. I., Mishima, K., Montalti, R., Giglio, M., Mazzotta, A., Lee, B., D'Silva, M., Wang, H. -P., Saleh, M., Pascual, F., Suhool, A., Nghia, P. P., Lim, C., Liu, Q., Kadam, P., Dalla Valle, B., Lai, E. C., Conticchio, M., Giustizieri, U., Citterio, D., Chen, Z., Yu, S., Ardito, Francesco, Vani, S., Dogeas, E., Siow, T. F., Mocchegianni, F., Ettorre, G. M., Colasanti, M., Guzman, Y., Arizza, G., Russolillo, N., Ferrero, A., Syn, N. L., Cipriani, F., Aghayan, D., Marino, M. V., Memeo, R., Mazzaferro, V., Chiow, A. K. H., Sucandy, I., Ivanecz, A., Vivarelli, M., Di Benedetto, F., Choi, S. -H., Lee, J. H., Park, J. O., Gastaca, M., Fondevila, C., Efanov, M., Rotellar, F., Choi, G. -H., Robles-Campos, R., Wang, X., Sutcliffe, R. P., Pratschke, J., Tang, C. N., Chong, C. C., D'Hondt, M., Yong, C. C., Ruzzenente, A., Herman, P., Kingham, T. P., Scatton, O., Liu, R., Levi Sandri, G. B., Soubrane, O., Mejia, A., Lopez-Ben, S., Monden, K., Wakabayashi, G., Cherqui, D., Troisi, R. I., Yin, M., Giuliante, F., Geller, D., Sugioka, A., Edwin, B., Cheung, T. -T., Long, T. C. D., Hilal, M. A., Fuks, D., Chen, K. -H., Aldrighetti, L., Han, H. -S., Goh, B. K. P., Chan, C. -Y., Prieto, M., Meurs, J., De Meyere, C., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Lee, K. -F., Ng, K. K., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Lee, L. -S., Jang, J. Y., Labadie, K. P., Kato, Y., Kojima, M., Fretland, A. A., Ghotbi, J., Coelho, F. F., Kruger, J. A. P., Lopez-Lopez, V., Magistri, P., Robert, M. C. I., Mishima, K., Montalti, R., Giglio, M., Mazzotta, A., Lee, B., D'Silva, M., Wang, H. -P., Saleh, M., Pascual, F., Suhool, A., Nghia, P. P., Lim, C., Liu, Q., Kadam, P., Dalla Valle, B., Lai, E. C., Conticchio, M., Giustizieri, U., Citterio, D., Chen, Z., Yu, S., Ardito, F., Vani, S., Dogeas, E., Siow, T. F., Mocchegianni, F., Ettorre, G. M., Colasanti, M., and Guzman, Y.

Subjects
difficulty, laparoscopic hepatectomy, laparoscopic liver, left lateral sectionectomy, size, Hepatology, Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE, Surgery
Abstract

Background: Tumor size (TS) represents a critical parameter in the risk assessment of laparoscopic liver resections (LLR). Moreover, TS has been rarely related to the extent of liver resection. The aim of this study was to study the relationship between tumor size and difficulty of laparoscopic left lateral sectionectomy (L-LLS). Methods: The impact of TS cutoffs was investigated by stratifying tumor size at each 10 mm-interval. The optimal cutoffs were chosen taking into consideration the number of endpoints which show a statistically significant split around the cut-points of interest and the magnitude of relative risk after correction for multiple risk factors. Results: A total of 1910 L-LLS were included. Overall, open conversion and intraoperative blood transfusion were 3.1 and 3.3%, respectively. The major morbidity rate was 2.7% and 90-days mortality 0.6%. Three optimal TS cutoffs were identified: 40-, 70-, and 100-mm. All the selected cutoffs showed a significant discriminative power for the prediction of open conversion, operative time, blood transfusion and need of Pringle maneuver. Moreover, 70- and 100-mm cutoffs were both discriminative for estimated blood loss and major complications. A stepwise increase in rates of open conversion rate (Z = 3.90, P

Published
2022

22. Defining Global Benchmarks for Laparoscopic Liver Resections: An International Multicenter Study

Author

Goh, B. K. P., Han, H. -S., Chen, K. -H., Chua, D. W., Chan, C. -Y., Cipriani, F., Aghayan, D. L., Fretland, A. A., Sijberden, J., D'Silva, M., Siow, T. F., Kato, Y., Lim, C., Nghia, P. P., Herman, P., Marino, M. V., Mazzaferro, V., Chiow, A. K. H., Sucandy, I., Ivanecz, A., Choi, S. H., Lee, J. H., Gastaca, M., Vivarelli, M., Giuliante, Felice, Ruzzenente, A., Yong, C. -C., Yin, M., Chen, Z., Fondevila, C., Efanov, M., Rotellar, F., Choi, G. -H., Campos, R. R., Wang, X., Sutcliffe, R. P., Pratschke, J., Lai, E., Chong, C. C., D'Hondt, M., Monden, K., Lopez-Ben, S., Coelho, F. F., Kingham, T. P., Liu, R., Long, T. C. D., Ferrero, A., Sandri, G. B. L., Saleh, M., Cherqui, D., Scatton, O., Soubrane, O., Wakabayashi, G., Troisi, R. I., Cheung, T. -T., Sugioka, A., Hilal, M. A., Fuks, D., Edwin, B., Aldrighetti, L., Syn, N., Prieto, M., Schotte, H., De Meyere, C., Krenzien, F., Schmelzle, M., Lee, K. -F., Salimgereeva, D., Alikhanov, R., Lee, L. -S., Jang, J. Y., Kojima, M., Ghotbi, J., Kruger, J. A. P., Lopez-Lopez, V., Valle, B. D., Casellas I Robert, M., Mishima, K., Montalti, R., Giglio, M., Mazzotta, A., Lee, B., Wang, H. -P., Pascual, F., Kadam, P., Tang, C. -N., Yu, S., Ardito, Francesco, Vani, S., Giustizieri, U., Citterio, D., Mocchegiani, F., Ettorre, G. M., Colasanti, M., Guzman, Y., Goh, Brian K P, Han, Ho-Seong, Chen, Kuo-Hsin, Chua, Darren W, Chan, Chung-Yip, Cipriani, Federica, Aghayan, Davit L, Fretland, Asmund A, Sijberden, Jasper, D'Silva, Mizelle, Siow, Tiing Foong, Kato, Yutaro, Lim, Chetana, Nghia, Phan Phuoc, Herman, Paulo, Marino, Marco V, Mazzaferro, Vincenzo, Chiow, Adrian K H, Sucandy, Iswanto, Ivanecz, Arpad, Choi, Sung Hoon, Lee, Jae Hoon, Gastaca, Mikel, Vivarelli, Marco, Giuliante, Felice, Ruzzenente, Andrea, Yong, Chee-Chien, Yin, Mengqui, Chen, Zewei, Fondevila, Constantino, Efanov, Mikhail, Rotellar, Fernando, Choi, Gi-Hong, Campos, Ricardo R, Wang, Xiaoying, Sutcliffe, Robert P, Pratschke, Johann, Lai, Eric, Chong, Charing C, D'Hondt, Mathieu, Monden, Kazuteru, Lopez-Ben, Santiago, Coelho, Fabricio F, Kingham, Thomas Peter, Liu, Rong, Long, Tran Cong Duy, Ferrero, Alessandro, Sandri, Giovanni B Levi, Saleh, Mansour, Cherqui, Daniel, Scatton, Olivier, Soubrane, Olivier, Wakabayashi, Go, Troisi, Roberto I, Cheung, Tan-To, Sugioka, Atsushi, Hilal, Mohammad Abu, Fuks, David, Edwin, Bjørn, and Aldrighetti, Luca

Subjects
benchmark, hepatectomy, quality assessment, Settore MED/18 - CHIRURGIA GENERALE, minimally invasive, Surgery, laparoscopic liver resection, global
Abstract

To establish global benchmark outcomes indicators after laparoscopic liver resections (L-LR).There is limited published data to date on the best achievable outcomes after L-LR.This is a post hoc analysis of a multicenter database of 11,983 patients undergoing L-LR in 45 international centers in 4 continents between 2015 and 2020. Three specific procedures: left lateral sectionectomy (LLS), left hepatectomy (LH), and right hepatectomy (RH) were selected to represent the 3 difficulty levels of L-LR. Fifteen outcome indicators were selected to establish benchmark cutoffs.There were 3519 L-LR (LLS, LH, RH) of which 1258 L-LR (40.6%) cases performed in 34 benchmark expert centers qualified as low-risk benchmark cases. These included 659 LLS (52.4%), 306 LH (24.3%), and 293 RH (23.3%). The benchmark outcomes established for operation time, open conversion rate, blood loss ≥500 mL, blood transfusion rate, postoperative morbidity, major morbidity, and 90-day mortality after LLS, LH, and RH were 209.5, 302, and 426 minutes; 2.1%, 13.4%, and 13.0%; 3.2%, 20%, and 47.1%; 0%, 7.1%, and 10.5%; 11.1%, 20%, and 50%; 0%, 7.1%, and 20%; and 0%, 0%, and 0%, respectively.This study established the first global benchmark outcomes for L-LR in a large-scale international patient cohort. It provides an up-to-date reference regarding the "best achievable" results for L-LR for which centers adopting L-LR can use as a comparison to enable an objective assessment of performance gaps and learning curves.

Published
2022

26. Recent outcome of liver transplantation for Budd Chiari syndrome - analysis of the european liver transplant registry (ELTR) and affiliated centres

Author

Dongelmans, E., Polak, Wojciech, Adam, R., Karam, Vincent, Pirenne, Jacques, Acarlı, Koray, Hakeem, A., Dhakshinamoorthy, Vignesh, Fedaruk, Dzmitry, Rummo, Oleg, Kılıç, Merve, Nordin, Arno, Fischer, L., Parente, Annalisa, Mirza, Dimitra, Bennet, William, Tokat, Yaman, Faitot, F., Antonelli, Barbara, Muiesan, Paola, Nadalin, Sivio, Berlakovich, Gabrielle, Patch, D., Berrevoet, Frederik, Ribnikar, Mojca, Gerster, Thomas, Savier, E., Gruttadauria, S., Ericzon, B. G., Cuervas-Mons, Valentin, Saborido, B. Perez, Croner, R., Magini, G., Rossi, R., Popescu, I., Razvan, Lazea, Schneeberger, S., Blokzijl, H., Llado, L., Gomez Bravo, Miguel Angel, Duvoux, Christophe, Mezjlik, V., Oniscu, G., Pearson, K., Dayangaç, Murat, Lucidi, Valerio, Detry, Olivier, Rotellar, F., and Murad, S. Darwish

Subjects
European Liver Transplant Registry (ELTR), Budd Chiari Syndrome, Liver Transplant
Published
2022

27. Laparoscopic radical hepatectomy and lymphadenectomy for incidental gallbladder cancer. Surgical technique with ICG fluorescence enhancement

Author

Lujan, J.A. (J.A.), Fusco-Almeida, A.M. (Ana Marisa), Lopez-Olaondo, L. (Luis), and Rotellar, F. (Fernando)

Subjects
Hepatectomy, Lymphadenectomy, Laparoscopic surgery, Gallbladder cancer, Anatomical resection, Indocyanine green
Abstract

Background: Radical re-resection has been demonstrated beneficial in incidental gallbladder cancer (iGBC) stages ≥ pT1b [1]. Anatomical resection (AR) of segments IVb-V is recommended, particularly for iGBC and liver-sided tumors [2]. Laparoscopically, this is a challenging procedure, as well as the regional lymphadenectomy, since inflammation from previous surgery can hinder identification of extrahepatic bile ducts. This difficult minimally invasive procedure, facilitated with indocyanine green (ICG) fluorescence enhancement [3] is herein didactically demonstrated. Methods: A 73 y. o. female patient underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for cholelithiasis. An iGBC -pT2b with positive cystic node-was found. Completion radical surgery was decided. Before surgery, 1.5mg of ICG was intravenously administered. A regional lymphadenectomy (stations 5-8-9-12-13) was safely performed: ICG allowed for bile duct visualization despite scarring from previous procedure. AR (IVb-V) was performed based on a glissonian-pedicle approach. After completing the procedure, a new dose of ICG was administered to discard ischemic areas in the remnant. Results: Total operative time was 359 min. Intermittent Pringle maneuver resulted in

Published
2022

28. Short-term outcomes of minimally invasive retromuscular ventral hernia repair using an enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach: systematic review and meta-analysis

Author

Aliseda, D. (Daniel), Sanchez-Justicia, C. (C.), Zozaya, G. (Gabriel), Luján, J. (Juan), Almeida, A. (Ana), Blanco, N. (N.), Marti-Cruchaga, P. (Pablo), and Rotellar, F. (Fernando)

Subjects
Enhanced view totally extraperitoneal, eTEP, Ventral hernia, Minimally invasive surgery
Abstract

Background The enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach is becoming increasingly more widely accepted as a promising technique in the treatment of ventral hernia. However, evidence is still lacking regarding the perioperative, postoperative and long-term outcomes of this technique. The aim of this meta-analysis is to summarize the current available evidence regarding the perioperative and short-term outcomes of ventral hernia repair using eTEP. Study design A systematic search was performed of PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane Library and Web of Science electronic databases to identify studies on the laparoscopic or robotic-enhanced view totally extraperitoneal (eTEP) approach for the treatment of ventral hernia. A pooled meta-analysis was performed. The primary end point was focused on short-term outcomes regarding perioperative characteristics and postoperative parameters. Results A total of 13 studies were identified involving 918 patients. Minimally invasive eTEP resulted in a rate of surgical site infection of 0% [95% CI 0.0-1.0%], a rate of seroma of 5% [95% CI 2.0-8.0%] and a rate of major complications (Clavien-Dindo III-IV) of 1% [95% CI 0.0-3.0%]. The rate of intraoperative complications was 2% [95% CI 0.0-4.0%] with a conversion rate of 1.0% [95% CI 0.0-3.0%]. Mean hospital length of stay was 1.77 days [95% CI 1.21-2.24]. After a median follow-up of 6.6 months (1-24), the rate of recurrence was 1% [95% CI 0.0-1.0%]. Conclusion Minimally invasive eTEP is a safe and effective approach for ventral hernia repair, with low reported intraoperative complications and good outcomes.

Published
2022

31. Outcome of Major Hepatectomy in Cirrhotic Patients: Does Surgical Approach Matter? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Author

Cacciaguerra, A. Benedetti, primary, Gorgec, B., additional, Lanari, J., additional, Cipriani, F., additional, Russolillo, N., additional, Mocchegiani, F., additional, Alseidi, A., additional, Ruzzenente, A., additional, Edwin, B., additional, D’Hondt, M., additional, Besselink, M., additional, Giuliante, F., additional, Fuks, D., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, López-Ben, S., additional, Ferrero, A., additional, Aldrighetti, L., additional, Cillo, U., additional, Vivarelli, M., additional, and Hilal, M. Abu, additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

32. Minimally Invasive Liver Resections for Hepatocelullar Carcinoma on Metabolic Syndrome: A Western Perspective on a Rising Disease

Author

Berardi, G., primary, Aldrighetti, L., additional, Ferrone, C., additional, Mazzaferro, V., additional, Serrano, P., additional, Cherqui, D., additional, Geller, D., additional, Cillo, U., additional, Ettorre, G., additional, Ferrero, A., additional, Kwon, D., additional, Cescon, M., additional, Sapisochin, G., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, Torzilli, G., additional, Abu-Hilal, M., additional, Corvera, C., additional, Helton, S., additional, Onkendi, E., additional, Ben, S. Lopez, additional, Troisi, R., additional, Simo, K., additional, Conrad, C., additional, and Kingham, P., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

33. A Model to Predict Outcomes Following Liver Resection for Hepatocellular Carcinoma on Metabolic Syndrome: A Western Perspective on a Rising Disease

Author

Berardi, G., primary, Aldrighetti, L., additional, Ferrone, C., additional, Mazzaferro, V., additional, Serrano, P., additional, Cherqui, D., additional, Geller, D., additional, Cillo, U., additional, Ettorre, G., additional, Ferrero, A., additional, Kwon, D., additional, Cescon, M., additional, Sapisochin, G., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, Torzilli, G., additional, Abu-Hilal, M., additional, Corvera, C., additional, Helton, S., additional, Onkendi, E., additional, Ben, S. Lopez, additional, Troisi, R., additional, Simo, K., additional, Conrad, C., additional, and Kingham, P., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

34. Development and Validation of a Decision Tree and CCI-Based Risk-Scoring Model for Iatrogenic Bile Duct Injury after Cholecystectomy: A Nationwide Multicenter Study

Author

Lopez-Lopez, V., primary, Andujar, R. Lopez, additional, Ramos, E., additional, Martinez, P.A., additional, Valdivieso, A., additional, Sabater, L., additional, Valladares, L. Díez, additional, Flores, B., additional, Brusadin, R., additional, Lopez-Conesa, A., additional, Martinez, S., additional, Serrablo, A., additional, Sánchez-Cabús, S., additional, González Gil, A., additional, González Masía, J.A., additional, Lonaiz, C., additional, Lucena, J.L., additional, Pastor, P., additional, García Zamora, C., additional, Calero, A., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, Ramia, J.M., additional, Cutillas, J., additional, Ruiperez-Valiente, J.A., additional, and Robles-Campos, R., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

35. Bile Leakage after Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resection; Incidence and Clinical Impact: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-Matched Study of 13,379 Patients

Author

Gorgec, B., primary, Benedetti Cacciaguerra, A., additional, Cipriani, F., additional, Ratti, F., additional, Russolillo, N., additional, Lanari, J., additional, Al-Jarrah, R., additional, Aghayan, D., additional, Primrose, J.N., additional, Giuliante, F., additional, D’Hondt, M., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, Fuks, D., additional, Lopez-Ben, S., additional, Vivarelli, M., additional, Edwin, B., additional, Cillo, U., additional, Ferrero, A., additional, Aldrighetti, L.A., additional, Besselink, M.G., additional, and Abu Hilal, M., additional

Published
2022
Full Text
View/download PDF

39. Impacto del abordaje mínimamente invasivo en el tratamiento de las metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal

Author

Ocaña-García, S. (Sira), Rotellar, F. (Fernando), and Ciria-Bru, R. (Rubén)

Subjects
MHCCR, Estrategias terapeúticas, Cirugía hepática mínimamente invasiva, Ciencias de la Salud::Cirugía [Materias Investigacion], Cirugía hepática laparoscópica, Metástasis hepáticas de cáncer colorrectal
Abstract

El cáncer colorrectal (CCR) constituye un importante problema de salud siendo uno de los cánceres más comunes a nivel mundial. Se estima una incidencia anual de 1.4 millones de nuevos casos ocasionando 693.900 muertes. En Asia, multitud de países incluyendo China, Japón, Corea del Sur y Singapur, han experimentado un incremento de la incidencia de CCR en las últimas dos décadas. En contraste, la mortalidad se encuentra en descenso en varios países de la Unión Europea, probablemente debido a la introducción de programas de cribado, pero también posiblemente por una mayor eficacia de los tratamientos y del aumento de las tasas de resección. Se ha estimado que el programa de cribado puede reducir la mortalidad en un 40% además de lograr una reducción del coste en el tratamiento. El pronóstico y la supervivencia a largo plazo de estos pacientes están en gran medida limitados por la presencia de metástasis a distancia. El hígado es el órgano más frecuentemente afectado en el CCR.

Published
2021

44. Benefits of Laparoscopy for Major Liver Resection in Cirrhotic Patients: Time for Pushing Indications Beyond the Limits? A Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Author

Benedetti Cacciaguerra, A., primary, Görgec, B., additional, Lanari, J., additional, Cipriani, F., additional, Russolillo, N., additional, Mocchegiani, F., additional, Zimmitti, G., additional, Alseidi, A., additional, Ruzzenente, A., additional, Edwin, B., additional, D’Hondt, M., additional, Besselink, M., additional, Giuliante, F., additional, Fuks, D., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, López-Ben, S., additional, Vivarelli, M., additional, Ferrero, A., additional, Aldrighetti, L., additional, Cillo, U., additional, and Abu Hilal, M., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

45. Bile Leakage after Laparoscopic and Open Liver Resection; Incidence and Clinical Impact: An International Multicenter Propensity Score-matched Study of 13,379 Patients

Author

Görgec, B., primary, Benedetti Cacciaguerra, A., additional, Cipriani, F., additional, Ratti, F., additional, Russolillo, N., additional, Lanari, J., additional, Al-Jarrah, R., additional, Aghayan, D., additional, Primrose, J.N., additional, Giuliante, F., additional, D’Hondt, M., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, Fuks, D., additional, Lopez-Ben, S., additional, Vivarelli, M., additional, Edwin, B., additional, Cillo, U., additional, Ferrero, A., additional, Aldrighetti, L.A., additional, Besselink, M.G., additional, and Abu Hilal, M., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

46. Assessing the Impact of Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery in the Overweight and Obese: An International Multicenter Propensity Score Matched Analysis

Author

Zimmitti, G., primary, Sijberden, J., additional, Ferrero, A., additional, Edwin, B., additional, Cillo, U., additional, Aldrighetti, L., additional, López-Ben, S., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, Fuks, D., additional, D'Hondt, M., additional, Primrose, J., additional, Vivarelli, M., additional, Ruzzenente, A., additional, Besselink, M.G., additional, Alseidi, A., additional, Efanov, M., additional, Giuliante, F., additional, and Abu Hilal, M., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

48. Textbook Outcome in Laparoscopic and Open Liver Surgery (TOLS): An International Multicenter Analysis of 8188 Patients

Author

Görgec, B., primary, Benedetti Cacciaguerra, A., additional, Lanari, J., additional, Russolillo, N., additional, Cipriani, F., additional, Aghayan, D., additional, Zimmitti, G., additional, Efanov, M., additional, Alseidi, A., additional, Mocchegiani, F., additional, Giuliante, F., additional, Ruzzenente, A., additional, Rotellar, F., additional, Fuks, D., additional, D’Hondt, M., additional, Vivarelli, M., additional, Edwin, B., additional, Aldrighetti, L.A., additional, Ferrero, A., additional, Cillo, U., additional, Besselink, M.G., additional, and Abu Hilal, M., additional

Published
2021
Full Text
View/download PDF

50. Precision anatomy for minimally invasive hepatobiliary pancreatic surgery: PAM-HBP surgery project

Author

Nakamura, M., Wakabayashi, G., Tsuchida, A., Nagakawa, Y., Abe, Y., Abu Hilal, M., Alconchel, F., Akahoshi, K., Aoki, T., Ariizumi, S., Asbun, H. J., Ban, D., Benedetti Cacciaguerra, A., Berardi, G., Boggi, U., Chan, A. C. Y., Chanwat, R., Chen, K. -H., Chen, Y., Cherqui, D., Cheung, T. T., Ciria, R., Duran, M., Endo, I., Fuks, D., Garbarino, G. M., Garcia Vazquez, A., Geller, D. A., Goh, B. K. P., Golse, N., Gotohda, N., Han, H. -S., Hasegawa, K., Hatano, E., He, J., Higuchi, R., Honda, G., Ikenaga, N., Ishikawa, Y., Iwashita, Y., Itano, O., Jang, J. -Y., Kaneko, H., Kang, C. M., Kato, Y., Kendrick, M. L., Kim, J. H., Kooby, D. A., Kozono, S., Liu, R., Lopez-Ben, S., Maekawa, A., Miyasaka, Y., Monden, K., Mori, Y., Morimoto, M., Murase, Y., Nakamura, Y., Nakata, K., Nishino, H., Ogiso, S., Ohtsuka, T., Osakabe, H., Palanivelu, C., Rotellar, F., Sakamoto, Y., Sakuma, L., Shirata, C., Shrikhande, S. V., Sugioka, A., Takaori, K., Takishita, C., Tanabe, M., Tang, C. -N., Tomassini, F., Urade, T., Wakabayashi, T., Wang, S. -E., Watanabe, Y., Wolfgang, C. L., Yamamoto, M., Yiengpruksawan, A., Yoon, Y. -S., Yoshizumi, T., and Zimmitt, G.

Subjects
Laparoscopic surgery, medicine.medical_specialty, Hepatology, business.industry, medicine.medical_treatment, MEDLINE, minimally invasive pancreatic surgery, minimally invasive hepatic surgery, laparoscopic surgery, Pancreatic surgery, Surgery, Pancreatectomy, Robotic Surgical Procedures, robotic surgery, medicine, precision anatomy, Humans, Minimally Invasive Surgical Procedures, Robotic surgery, Laparoscopy, business, Pancreas
Published
2020

Catalog

Books, media, physical & digital resources
See catalog results